cefepime and Seizures

Cefepime is a widely used antibiotic with neurotoxicity attributed to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and exhibit concentration-dependent ϒ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) antagonism. Neurotoxic symptoms include depressed consciousness, encephalopathy, aphasia, myoclonus, seizures, and coma. Data suggest that up to 15% of ICU patients treated with cefepime may experience these adverse effects. Risk factors include renal dysfunction, excessive dosing, preexisting brain injury, and elevated serum cefepime concentrations. We aimed to characterize the clinical course of cefepime neurotoxicity and response to interventions.. A librarian-assisted search identified publications describing cefepime-associated neurotoxicity from January 1980 to February 2016 using the CINAHL and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included cefepime, neurotoxicity, encephalopathy, seizures, delirium, coma, non-convulsive status epilepticus, myoclonus, confusion, aphasia, agitation, and death. Two reviewers independently assessed identified articles for eligibility and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for data reporting.. Of the 123 citations identified, 37 (representing 135 patient cases) were included. Patients had a median age of 69 years, commonly had renal dysfunction (80%) and required intensive care (81% of patients with a reported location). All patients exhibited altered mental status, with reduced consciousness (47%), myoclonus (42%), and confusion (42%) being the most common symptoms. All 98 patients (73% of cohort) with electroencephalography had abnormalities, including non-convulsive status epilepticus (25%), myoclonic status epilepticus (7%), triphasic waves (40%), and focal sharp waves (39%). As per Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dosing guidance, 48% of patients were overdosed; however, 26% experienced neurotoxicity despite appropriate dosing. Median cefepime serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were 45 mg/L (n = 21) and 13 mg/L (n = 4), respectively. Symptom improvement occurred in 89% of patients, and 87% survived to hospital discharge. The median delay from starting the drug to symptom onset was 4 days, and resolution occurred a median of 2 days after the intervention, which included cefepime discontinuation, antiepileptic administration, or hemodialysis.. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity is challenging to recognize in the critically ill due to widely varying symptoms that are common in ICU patients. This adverse reaction can occur despite appropriate dosing, usually resolves with drug interruption, but may require additional interventions such as antiepileptic drug administration or dialysis.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Consciousness Disorders; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Seizures

Despite the availability of more than 20 clinical antiepileptic drugs, approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not respond to antiepileptic drug treatment. Therefore, it is important to develop antiepileptic products that function via novel mechanisms. In the present study, we evaluated data from one of the largest global databases to identify drugs with antiepileptic effects, and subsequently attempted to understand the effect of the combination of antiepileptic drugs and valacyclovir in epileptic seizures using a kindling model. To induce kindling in mice, pentylenetetrazol at a dose of 40 mg/kg was administered once every 48 h. Valacyclovir was orally administered 30 min before antiepileptic drug injection in kindled mice, and behavioral seizures were monitored for 20 min following pentylenetetrazol administration. Additionally, c-Fos expression in the hippocampal dentate gyrus was measured in kindled mice. Valacyclovir showed inhibitory effects on pentylenetetrazol-induced kindled seizures. In addition, simultaneous use of levetiracetam and valacyclovir caused more potent inhibition of seizure activity, and neither valproic acid nor diazepam augmented the anti-seizure effect in kindled mice. Furthermore, kindled mice showed increased c-Fos levels in the dentate gyrus. The increase in c-Fos expression was significantly inhibited by the simultaneous use of levetiracetam and valacyclovir. The findings of the present study indicate that a combination of levetiracetam and valacyclovir had possible anticonvulsive effects on pentylenetetrazol-induced kindled epileptic seizures. These results suggest that valacyclovir may have an antiseizure effect in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Cefepime; Databases, Factual; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Repositioning; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hippocampus; Humans; Kindling, Neurologic; Levetiracetam; Male; Mice; Pentylenetetrazole; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos; Seizures; Valacyclovir

The antibiotics cefepime and meropenem are recommended for the treatment of neutropenia. However, cefepime has been found to be associated with both peripheral and central adverse events such as renal impairment and seizures, respectively. Previous studies showed that cefepime exacerbated convulsions in corneal kindled mouse models of epilepsy. However, its involvement in chemotherapy-induced side effects is unknown.. In this study, we examined the convulsive potential of cefepime (500 mg/kg) and meropenem (500 mg/kg) in pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-kindled mice using an electroconvulsive shock test with low-intensity stimulus currents. Then, the effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 200 and 400 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment, a model of chemotherapy-induced side effects, were investigated in the PTZ-kindled mouse model.. In fully PTZ-kindled mice, intravenous administration of cefepime (500 mg/kg) or meropenem (500 mg/kg) did not elicit any convulsions in the electroconvulsive shock test with low-intensity stimulus currents. In the PTZ-kindled mice treated with 5-FU (200 mg/kg), intravenous administration of cefepime (500 mg/kg) exacerbated the convulsions that occurred within 1 min in the electroconvulsive shock test, and the mice subsequently developed convulsive status epilepticus. However, intravenous administration of meropenem (500 mg/kg) did not produce such effects.. These findings suggest that the combination of 5-FU and cefepime exacerbates early-onset convulsive seizures and elicits delayed-onset convulsive status epilepticus. Additionally, 5-FU treatment increases the risk of induction of neurotoxic side effects by cefepime.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Convulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Fluorouracil; Kindling, Neurologic; Male; Meropenem; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Pentylenetetrazole; Seizures

The incidence of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) has been previously underestimated, and there have only been sporadic reports from critical neurological settings. The present study aimed to investigate the potential factors associated with disease development, electroencephalography (EEG) sub-classification, and outcome measures.. The 10-year medical records of patients who underwent EEG between 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, and developed encephalopathy after cefepime therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Age- and sex-matched controls were included for further analysis. Demographic data, the occurrence of clinical seizures, non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), receiving maintenance or urgent hemodialysis, EEG findings, and functional outcomes were analyzed. The Chi-square test and a logistic regression model were applied to survey significant prognostic factors relating to mortality.. A total of 42 CIN patients were identified, including 25 patients from wards and 17 from intensive care units; their mean age was 75.8 ± 11.8 years. Twenty-one patients (50%) had chronic kidney disease, and 18 (43%) had acute kidney injury. Among these patients, 32 (76%) received appropriate cefepime dose adjustment. Three patients had a normal renal function at the time of CIN onset. The logistic regression model suggested that maintenance hemodialysis and longer duration of cefepime use were independently associated with the development of CIN, with odds ratios of 3.8 and 1.2, respectively. NCSE was frequently noted in the CIN patients (64%). Generalized periodic discharge with or without triphasic morphology was the most common EEG pattern (38%), followed by generalized rhythmic delta activity and generalized spike-and-waves. AEDs were administered to 86% of the patients. A total of 17 patients (40%) did not survive to hospital discharge. Adequate cefepime dose adjustment and early cefepime discontinuation led to a better prognosis.. CIN was associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Neurotoxic symptoms could still occur when the cefepime dose was adjusted, or in patients with normal renal function. Patients with maintenance hemodialysis or a longer duration of cefepime therapy tended to develop CIN. Early recognition of abnormal EEG findings allowed for the withdrawal of the offending agent, resulting in clinical improvements and a better prognosis at discharge.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Duration of Therapy; Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Taiwan

Metabolic encephalopathy and Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE) have been reported with cephalosporin use, particularly cefepime. We aimed to analyze the clinical and EEG findings in patients with cephalosporin-related neurotoxicity (CRN) at our hospital identified via the hospital EEG database, and to critically review CRN case reports in the literature. A Medline search was performed to identify CRN cases where a representative sample of EEG was provided. EEGs were analyzed using published criteria differentiating NCSE from triphasic waves (TW). Eleven patients at our hospital were identified with CRN (9 cefepime, 2 ceftriaxone): all had an encephalopathy with decreased consciousness and/or confusion. One patient had clinical seizures and 6 had multifocal myoclonus. All patients had abnormal EEGs, all with moderate to severe generalized slowing and 10 also with TW. Recovery was related to cephalosporin withdrawal rather than antiepileptic therapy. Analysis of 37 EEG samples of CRN patients reported in the literature as NCSE (30) or TW (7) revealed that most did not meet criteria for NCSE, with 33 showing TW, 1 showing generalised epileptiform discharges and 3 being uninterpretable. CRN usually produces a toxic encephalopathy rather than NCSE, and is commonly associated with triphasic waves on EEG. In most patients anti-epileptic and/or sedative drugs do not hasten clinical improvement.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Confusion; Consciousness Disorders; Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Male; Myoclonus; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Seizures; Status Epilepticus

Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), such as New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) have spread world-wide and present a serious threat. Expression of MBLs confers resistance in Gram-negative bacteria to all classes of β-lactam antibiotics, with the exception of monobactams, which are intrinsically stable to MBLs. However, existing first generation monobactam drugs like aztreonam have limited clinical utility against MBL-expressing strains because they are impacted by serine β-lactamases (SBLs), which are often co-expressed in clinical isolates. Here, we optimized novel monobactams for stability against SBLs, which led to the identification of LYS228 (compound 31). LYS228 is potent in the presence of all classes of β-lactamases and shows potent activity against carbapenem-resistant isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; CHO Cells; Cricetulus; Drug Stability; Escherichia coli; Female; Humans; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Structure; Monobactams; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Receptors, GABA-A; Seizures; Structure-Activity Relationship; Thienamycins

Cefepime and ceftazidime are cephalosporins used for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. These cephalosporins are used off-label in the setting of minimal safety data for young infants.. We identified all infants discharged from 348 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group between 1997 and 2012 who were exposed to either cefepime or ceftazidime in the first 120 days of life. We reported clinical and laboratory adverse events occurring in infants exposed to cefepime or ceftazidime and used multivariable logistic regression to compare the odds of seizures and death between the 2 groups.. A total of 1761 infants received 13,293 days of ceftazidime, and 594 infants received 4628 days of cefepime. Laboratory adverse events occurred more frequently on days of therapy with ceftazidime than with cefepime (373 vs. 341 per 1000 infant days, P < 0.001). Seizure was the most commonly observed clinical adverse event, occurring in 3% of ceftazidime-treated infants and 4% of cefepime-treated infants (P = 0.52). Mortality was similar between the ceftazidime and cefepime groups (5% vs. 3%, P = 0.07). There was no difference in the adjusted odds of seizure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.03)] or the combined outcome of mortality or seizures [OR = 1.00 (0.96-1.04)] in infants exposed to ceftazidime versus those exposed to cefepime.. In this cohort of infants, cefepime was associated with fewer laboratory adverse events than ceftazidime, although this may have been due to a significant difference in clinical exposures and severity of illness between the 2 groups. There was no difference in seizure risk or mortality between the 2 drugs.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Hospitalization; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Seizures; Survival Analysis

We have reported significantly higher convulsion prevalence in patients treated with cefepime than in those treated with meropenem. Additionally, cefepime-associated convulsions were found only in patients with brain disorders, not renal failure. Here, we compared the convulsive liability of cefepime and meropenem administered intravenously in normal and corneal kindled mice with low seizure thresholds. We used the proconvulsive test in normal mice following pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) injection and electroconvulsive shock at low-stimulus currents and in corneal kindled mice. We also measured electroencephalogram (EEG) activity 1 min after antibiotic injections. Intravenous injection of cefepime and meropenem at 250 or 500 mg/kg of body weight had no effect on PTZ-induced convulsions in normal mice. However, in convulsions induced by electroconvulsive shock at low-stimulus currents, mean seizure stage following cefepime administration at 500 mg/kg was significantly higher than that following saline injection. Additionally, EEG spikes were recorded for mice that were given cefepime (500 mg/kg). In corneal kindled mice following cefepime injection, mean seizure stage was significantly higher than that following meropenem injection. The convulsive liability of cefepime is significantly higher than that of meropenem in normal and corneal kindled mice. In patients with low seizure thresholds, convulsive liability of cefepime may be assumed.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Convulsants; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Administration Schedule; Electroencephalography; Electroshock; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Meropenem; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Pentylenetetrazole; Seizures; Severity of Illness Index; Species Specificity; Thienamycins

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Electroencephalography; Humans; Periodicity; Seizures

The US Food and Drug Administration reported seizures associated with the use of cefepime (primarily in patients with renal impairment who did not receive appropriate dose adjustments of cefepime).. The maximum dose of cefepime in the USA (6 g per day) is higher than that in Japan (4 g per day). We investigated the prevalence of convulsions associated with the use of cefepime by comparing it with that of meropenem.. A retrospective study was undertaken in 183 patients treated with cefepime and 745 patients treated with meropenem over 2 years at Ehime University Hospital. Cefepime or meropenem-associated convulsions were defined according to the following criteria: (1) administration or dose escalation of diazepam, phenytoin, phenobarbital and thiamylal given via the intravenous route (2) convulsions recorded in medical records during administration of cefepime or meropenem.. The prevalence of convulsions was significantly greater in the cefepime treated group than in the meropenem-treated group. Among the patients who had cefepime-associated convulsions, none had renal failure. Cefepime-associated convulsions occurred only in patients with brain disorders.. Cefepime-associated convulsions should be recognized as potential complications even in patients with normal renal function. Brain disorders may increase the risk of cefepime-associated convulsions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Brain Diseases; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Female; Hospitals, University; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Japan; Male; Meropenem; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Prevalence; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Seizures; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Thienamycins

Ensuring effective, safe drug dosing in critically ill patients can be difficult, due to variable and dynamic organ function. An 82-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit with severe community-acquired pneumonia, septic shock and progressive organ failure. He required ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy. He developed seizures which we believe were due to cefepime toxicity. Following the first seizure, we took serial measurements of plasma cefepime levels, and a single measurement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cefepime level. The peak plasma cefepime concentration was 73.8 µg/mL (minimum inhibitory concentration of target enterobacteriaceae is 8 µg/mL) and the CSF level was 6.1 µg/mL. The patient had four seizures during the period of high plasma cefepime concentration, but no more episodes once the drug level decreased to non-toxic levels. This case highlights the difficulty in predicting pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, particularly those receiving renal replacement therapy. We suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients may be a useful intervention to avoid antibiotic-related toxicities.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Drug Monitoring; Hemofiltration; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pneumonia; Seizures; Shock, Septic

To compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving an alternative dosage of meropenem with those of patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin or the traditional dosage of meropenem after failure of or intolerance to cefepime for treatment of febrile neutropenia.. Retrospective, single-center cohort study.. 1250-bed urban academic medical center.. One hundred twenty-seven adults with neutropenic fever who received either imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem; imipenem-cilastatin was the preferred carbapenem until September 1, 2006, after which meropenem became the formulary carbapenem.. Of the 127 patients, 40 received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006; 87 patients received meropenem between September 1, 2006, and August 31, 2007: 29 received a traditional dosage of meropenem 1 g every 8 hours, and 58 received an alternative dosage of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours. Primary outcomes of time to defervescence (median 3 vs 2 vs 3 days), need for additional antibiotics (20% vs 17% vs 14%), and time to receipt of additional antibiotics (median 5 vs 2 vs 1 days) were not significantly different among the imipenem-cilastatin, traditionally dosed meropenem, and alternatively dosed meropenem groups, respectively. In addition, significant differences in secondary outcomes, which were treatment duration (median 10 vs 8 vs 8 days), seizure rate (0% vs 0% vs 0%), in-hospital mortality (5% vs 7% vs 7%), and 30-day mortality (13% vs 7% vs 14%), were not identified among the three groups, respectively.. The alternative meropenem dosage of 500 mg every 6 hours yielded similar patient outcomes, including time to defervescence, need for additional antibiotics, duration of therapy, and mortality, when compared with the traditional meropenem dosage and imipenem-cilastatin in adults with febrile neutropenia. In addition, no adverse effects on clinical outcomes were observed with the alternative dosage of meropenem.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cilastatin; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Fever; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Retreatment; Seizures; Thienamycins; Time Factors