cefepime and Pneumonia

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Candida; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Treatment Outcome

We compared the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime and cefepime in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The 148 enrolled patients received 2 g ceftazidime three times daily or 2 g cefepime twice daily. The clinical success rate was the same for both drugs. Even the microbiological effectiveness was similar. Both drug regimens were well tolerated. We conclude that 2 g ceftazidime three times daily were as effective as 2 g cefepime twice daily for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients. The cost of ceftazidime treatment was, however, higher than the cost of cefepime treatment.

Topics: Aged; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Treatment Outcome

Effective empiric treatment of pneumonia requires antibiotic coverage against gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens, including drug-resistant isolates. We compared the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) cefepime (2 g administered every 12 h) to those of i.v. ceftriaxone (1 g administered every 12 h) for the empiric treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Of the 115 patients randomized to the study, 86 (cefepime recipients, n = 40; ceftriaxone recipients, n = 46) were evaluated for clinical efficacy (clinically evaluated patients). Favorable clinical outcomes (cure or improvement) were comparable among clinically evaluated patients in the cefepime and ceftriaxone treatment arms (95.0 versus 97.8%, respectively; 95% confidence interval for treatment difference [data for ceftriaxone group minus data for cefepime group], -5.1 to +10.8%). The most common bacteria isolated from patients in both treatment groups were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus. In clinically evaluated patients with a microbiologic response, all (100%) of the 32 pathogens from cefepime-treated patients and 97.4% (38 of 39) of the pathogens from ceftriaxone-treated patients were eradicated (documented or presumed eradication). The one persistent infection in the ceftriaxone group was caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Both treatments were well tolerated. Our data thus suggest that cefepime and ceftriaxone have comparable safety and efficacy for the treatment of pneumonia in hospitalized patients.

Topics: Cefepime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia

The efficacy, safety and usefulness of cefepime (CFPM), a new cephem antibiotic, in bacterial pneumonia, were evaluated in a comparative study against ceftazidime (CAZ). Each drug was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a dose of 1.0 g (nominal potency) twice daily for 14 days, and the following results were obtained. 1. A total of 183 cases were enrolled in this study. Efficacy rates ("good" or better responses) as evaluated by the subcommittee were 90.3% (65/72) in the CFPM group and 94.0% (63/67) in the CAZ group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. 2. Efficacy rates ("good" or better responses), as evaluated by attending physicians, (in the same bacterial pneumonia cases which were subjected to evaluation by the subcommittee) were 87.5% (63/72) in the CFPM group and 89.6% (60/67) in the CAZ group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. 3. Bacteriologically, eradication rates were 96.9% (31/32) in the CFPM group and 96.7% (29/30) in the CAZ group with no significant difference between the 2 groups. 4. The incidence of side effects was 5.9% (5/85) in the CFPM group and 4.8% (4/84) in the CAZ group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No significant difference was also found between the 2 groups in the incidence of abnormal laboratory findings; 28.4% (23/81) of the case in the CFPM group and 34.1% (28/82) in the CAZ group. 5. As for overall usefulness of the drug in bacterial pneumonia cases, utility rates ("useful" or better evaluations) as evaluated by the subcommittee were 88.9% (64/72) in the CFPM group and 92.5% (62/67) in the CAZ group. The rates as evaluated by investigators (in cases judged as evaluable by the subcommittee) were 87.5% (63/72) and 85.1% (57/67), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups. These results indicated that CFPM is very useful for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Pneumonia

Cefepime is a new cephalosporin with a broad antimicrobial spectrum that includes Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. To study the efficacy and safety of cefepime for treatment of pneumonia, 65 patients were randomized to therapy with either cefepime or ceftazidime at a two to one ratio. Of the 57 evaluable patients, 89% of the cefepime patients and 84% of the ceftazidime patients were cured clinically or improved. Haemophilus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Neisseria spp. were common pathogens. Bacteriological cure was achieved in 31 (91%) of cefepime patients and 17 (100%) ceftazidime patients. Adverse clinical and laboratory reactions possibly due to study drug occurred in 9 (21%) cefepime patients and in 1 (5%) ceftazidime patient. Most reactions were mild and resolved with discontinuation of study drug. In this study, cefepime appeared as effective as ceftazidime for the treatment of pneumonia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bacteria; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Pneumonia

Cefepime/taniborbactam is a cephalosporin/bicyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor combination in clinical development for nosocomial pneumonia due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria. A murine pneumonia model was used to characterize cefepime/taniborbactam in vivo pharmacodynamics against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.. Clinical cefepime-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa strains expressing serine carbapenemases and/or other cefepime-hydrolysing β-lactamases with cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs of 0.12-16 mg/L were used. Cefepime and taniborbactam human-simulated regimens equivalent to clinical doses (i.e. 2/0.5 g q8h) were established in the pneumonia model. The in vivo activity of the cefepime human-simulated regimen given alone or concomitantly with escalating taniborbactam exposures against eight Enterobacterales and four P. aeruginosa strains was assessed. Taniborbactam pharmacokinetics were evaluated to determine systemic exposures of regimens used; taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC values required for efficacy were estimated using the Hill equation. In addition, the in vivo activity of the cefepime/taniborbactam combination human-simulated regimen was assessed against 18 strains.. Among Enterobacterales, median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC values associated with stasis and 1 log kill were 0.96 and 4.03, respectively, while for P. aeruginosa, requirements were 1.35 and 3.02 for stasis and 1 log kill, respectively. The cefepime/taniborbactam human-simulated regimen produced >2 log kill in 14/18 strains and >1 log kill in 18/18 strains.. Cefepime/taniborbactam produced marked in vivo bactericidal activity against cefepime-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates with cefepime/taniborbactam MICs up to and including 16 mg/L in the pneumonia model. Assessments of the probability of clinical attainment of the identified targets should be undertaken to support the selected cefepime/taniborbactam dose for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia; Humans; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pneumonia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Humans; Imipenem; Klebsiella; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Ligands; Meropenem; Metal Nanoparticles; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Monobactams; Nanoparticles; Pneumonia; Porins; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Zinc Oxide

This was a comparative assessment of WCK 5222 (cefepime/zidebactam 2/1 g as a 1 h infusion every 8 h) efficacy using human-simulated plasma and ELF exposures against serine-carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model.. Ten clinical isolates were utilized: eight were serine-carbapenemase-producing (KPC, n = 4; OXA-48-like, n = 4) Enterobacterales with WCK 5222 MICs (1:1) ranging from 1 to 4 mg/L; and two were previously studied MDR isolates serving as quality controls. Lungs of mice were inoculated with 50 μL of 107 cfu/mL. Treatment mice received human-simulated regimens of cefepime, zidebactam or WCK 5222 derived from plasma or epithelial lining fluid (ELF) profiles obtained from healthy subjects. Lung bacterial densities resulting from the humanized exposures in plasma and ELF were compared.. Initial lung bacterial densities ranged from 6.06 to 6.87 log10 cfu/lungs, with a mean bacterial burden increase to 9.06 ± 0.42 after 24 h. Human-simulated plasma and ELF exposures of cefepime and zidebactam monotherapy had no activity. Human-simulated WCK 5222 plasma exposures resulted in a >1 log10 cfu/lungs reduction in bacterial burden for all isolates. Humanized WCK 5222 ELF exposures achieved a >1 log10 cfu/lungs reduction for all isolates. While statistically significant differences in bacterial burden reduction were observed between the plasma and ELF exposures for WCK 5222 in 5/8 isolates, all treatments achieved the translational kill target of a >1 log10 cfu reduction.. Clinically achievable WCK 5222 plasma and ELF exposures produced in vivo killing of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model that is predictive of efficacy in humans.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; beta-Lactamases; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cyclooctanes; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Piperidines; Pneumonia

Cefepime is known to exert bactericidal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity, most likely caused by increased exposure, has recently become a major concern in clinical practice; therefore, appropriate dose reduction of cefepime should be applied with respect to patients with low cefepime clearance (mostly eliminated by the kidneys). Here, we report a case in which Bayesian prediction-based therapeutic drug monitoring (Bayes-TDM) was effectively used to reduce the dose of cefepime in a patient with pneumonia to prevent neurotoxic complications. A woman (age: 59 years, body weight: 32.5 kg, serum creatinine concentration: 1.02 mg/dL) developed pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa while receiving treatment for scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus. She started treatment with a dosing regimen of 1.0 g of cefepime every 8 h (day X). On day X+5, aphasia developed, and the serum cefepime concentration was 71.3 mg/L at trough. This concentration was twice or thrice higher than the reported safe concentration of cefepime (22 or 35 mg/L at trough). Therefore, we reduced the dose of cefepime to 0.5 g every 12 h using Bayes-TDM from day X+7. As a result, the severity of aphasia decreased by day X+10, and this dose was successfully continued up to day X+13 without further adjustment. In conclusion, individualizing doses by Bayes-TDM may be useful in preventing adverse effects associated with cefepime treatment.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aphasia; Bayes Theorem; Cefepime; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Our objective was to systematically study the influence of length of hospital stay on bacterial resistance in relevant respiratory tract isolates.. Using prospective epidemiological data from the National Swiss Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance System, susceptibility testing results for respiratory isolates retrospectively retrieved from patients hospitalised between 2008 and 2014 were compiled. Generalized additive models were used to illustrate resistance rates relative to hospitalisation duration and to adjust for co-variables.. In all, 19 622 isolates of six relevant and predominant species were included. Resistance patterns for the predominant species showed a species-specific and antibiotic-resistance-specific profile in function of hospitalisation duration. The oxacillin resistance profile in Staphylococcus aureus isolates was constantly increasing (monophasic). The pattern of resistance to cefepime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was biphasic with a decreasing resistance rate for the first 5 days of hospitalisation and an increase for days 6-30. A different biphasic pattern occurred in Escherichia coli regarding amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistance: odds/day increased for the first 7 days of hospitalisation and then remained stable for days 8-30. In the adjusted models epidemiological characteristics such as age, ward type, hospital type and linguistic region were identified as relevant co-variables for the resistance rates. The contribution of these confounders was specific to the individual species/antibiotic resistance models.. Resistance rates do not follow a dichotomic pattern (early versus late nosocomial) as suggested by current hospital-acquired pneumonia treatment guidelines. Duration of hospitalisation rather appears to have a more complex and non-linear relationship with bacterial resistance in hospital-acquired pneumonia, also depending on host and environmental factors.

Topics: Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterobacter; Escherichia coli; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Length of Stay; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Oxacillin; Pneumonia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Respiratory System; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antibiotics are commonly administered to hospitalized patients with infiltrates for possible bacterial pneumonia, often leading to unnecessary treatment and increasing the risk for resistance emergence. Therefore, we performed a study to determine if an enhanced antibiotic de-escalation practice could improve antibiotic utilization in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia cared for in an academic closed intensive care unit (ICU).. This was a prospective cross-over trial comparing routine antibiotic management (RAM) and enhanced antimicrobial de-escalation (EAD) performed within two medical ICUs (total 34 beds) at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, an academic referral center. Patients in the EAD group had their antibiotic orders and microbiology results reviewed daily by a dedicated team comprised of a second-year critical care fellow, an ICU attending physician and an ICU pharmacist. Antibiotic de-escalation recommendations were made when appropriate based on microbiologic test results and clinical response to therapy.. There were 283 patients evaluable, with suspected pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: 139 (49.1%) patients in the RAM group and 144 (50.9%) in the EAD group. Early treatment failure based on clinical deterioration occurred in 33 (23.7%) and 40 (27.8%) patients, respectively (P = 0.438). In the remaining patients, antimicrobial de-escalation occurred in 70 (66.0%) and 70 (67.3%), respectively (P = 0.845). There was no difference between groups in total antibiotic days ((median (interquartile range)) 7.0 days (4.0, 9.0) versus 7.0 days (4.0, 8.8) (P = 0.616)); hospital mortality (25.2% versus 35.4% (P = 0.061)); or hospital duration (12.0 days (6.0, 20.0) versus 11.0 days (6.0, 22.0) (P = 0.918).. The addition of an EAD program to a high-intensity daytime staffing model already practicing a high-level of antibiotic stewardship in an academic ICU was not associated with greater antibiotic de-escalation or a reduction in the overall duration of antibiotic therapy.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02685930 . Registered on 26 January 2016.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Monobactams; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Prospective Studies; Quinolones; Respiration, Artificial; Statistics, Nonparametric

Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Sepsis; Tazobactam; Thienamycins; Tobramycin

Minocycline-based combination therapy has been suggested to be a possible choice for the treatment of infections caused by minocycline-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii, but its use for the treatment of infections caused by minocycline-resistant A. baumannii is not well established. In this study, we compared the efficacy of minocycline-based combination therapy (with colistin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, or meropenem) to that of colistin in combination with meropenem for the treatment of minocycline-resistant A. baumannii infection. From 2006 to 2010, 191 (17.6%) of 1,083 A. baumannii complex isolates not susceptible to minocycline from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance program were collected. Four representative A. baumannii isolates resistant to minocycline, amikacin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam were selected on the basis of the diversity of their pulsotypes, collection years, health care setting origins, and geographic areas of origination. All four isolates had tetB and overexpressed adeABC, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Among all minocycline-based regimens, only the combination with colistin produced a fractional inhibitory concentration index comparable to that achieved with meropenem combined with colistin. Minocycline (4 or 16 μg/ml) in combination with colistin (0.5 μg/ml) also synergistically killed minocycline-resistant isolates in time-kill studies. Minocycline (50 mg/kg of body weight) in combination with colistin (10 mg/kg) significantly improved the survival of mice and reduced the number of bacteria present in the lungs of mice compared to the results of monotherapy. However, minocycline (16 μg/ml)-based therapy was not effective at reducing biofilm-associated bacteria at 24 or 48 h when its effectiveness was compared to that of colistin (0.5 μg/ml) and meropenem (8 μg/ml). The clinical use of minocycline in combination with colistin for the treatment of minocycline-resistant A. baumannii may warrant further investigation.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter Infections; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biofilms; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Colistin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gentamicins; Imipenem; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia; Taiwan; Thienamycins

To investigate the spectrum and antimicrobial resistance of major pathogensthat causing nosocomial infections in China, 2013.. Nosocomial cases as well as pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSI), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and intra-abdominal infections (IAI) from 13 teaching hospital around China were collected. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the agar dilution method. The CLSI M100-S23 criteria were used for interpretation.. Of all cases, 1 022 cases were from BSI, 683 from HAP and 674 from IAI.Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most prevalent pathogens causing BSI and IAI while Acinetobacter baumanii (34.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were dominated in HAP. Tigecycline, imipenem and meropenem exhibited high potency against Enterobacteriaceae and the susceptibilities rates were 95.6%, 94.2%and 95.2% respectively. Enterobacteriaceae demonstrated high resistance against cephalosporins (52.3%) and fluoroquinolones (38.9%) but were susceptible to β-lactam+inhibitor. Of all the Enterobacteriaceae, 30.5% were ESBLs positive and 4.3% were carbapenem resistant. Acinetobacter baumanii showed low susceptibilities to the microbial agents except for tigecycline (90.5%) and colistin (100%). The rate of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumanii was 76.6%. Amikacin, ciprofloxacin, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam showed high antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with susceptible rate 88.5%, 77.6%, 72.7% and 64.5% respectively. The resistant rate to imipenem and meropenem were 42.1% and 32.2%. All Staphylococcus aureus (166 strains) were susceptible to tigecycline, linezolid, daptomycin and glycopeptides. MRSA accounted for 46.9% of all the Staphylococcus aureus. The prevalence of MRSA in IAI (55.2%) and HAP (54.4%) were higher that that in BSI (35.0%). No Enterococcus strains were found resistant to tigecycline, linezolid and daptomycin. VRE was found in Enterococcus faecium, accounting for 1.9% of all Enterococcus faecium strains.. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common pathogens causing nosocomial infections. Nosocomial pathogens showed high susceptibilities against tigecycline. For ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains, β-lactam+Inhibitor show high antibacterial activities. Vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid exhibit high potency to Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; China; Cross Infection; Hospitals, Teaching; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Pneumonia; Tigecycline; Vancomycin

Acinetobacter baumannii is characterized by strictly aerobic, gram-negative, nonmotile, nonlactose-fermenting, oxidase-negative, catalase-positive coccobacilli, and the combination of its environmental resilience and its rapid development of resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials renders it a successful nosocomial pathogen.. The aim of this study was to identify specific risk factors and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia because of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB).. The retrospective study, set in a 1,500-bed referral and tertiary care hospital, was conducted to analyze the clinical and microbiologic data of patients with nosocomial pneumonia because of Acinetobacter baumannii (A baumannii) from January 2006 to December 2011. Comparisons were made between patients with CRAB pneumonia and patients with carbapenem-susceptible A baumannii (CSAB) pneumonia. Only the first isolation of A baumannii was considered.. A total of 145 patients with CSAB pneumonia and 97 patients with CRAB pneumonia was included. Among these patients, the independent risk factors for acquiring CRAB pneumonia were Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (>20) at admission, systemic illnesses (chronic respiratory disease and cerebrovascular accident), presence of excess noninvasive or invasive devices (mechanical ventilation), and ever used antibiotics within 28 days (carbapenem and cefepime). The patients with CRAB pneumonia had higher mortality rate than CSAB pneumonia. Multivariate analysis showed that, among patients with A baumannii pneumonia, APACHE II score (>20) at pneumonia onset, infections with other microorganisms, and inappropriate therapy were independently associated with 28-day mortality.. Patients with CRAB pneumonia have a higher mortality rate than those with CSAB pneumonia. The nosocomial occurrence of CRAB pneumonia is strongly related to systemic illnesses, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, and ever used antibiotics within 28 days.

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter Infections; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactam Resistance; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cohort Studies; Cross Infection; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Ensuring effective, safe drug dosing in critically ill patients can be difficult, due to variable and dynamic organ function. An 82-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit with severe community-acquired pneumonia, septic shock and progressive organ failure. He required ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy. He developed seizures which we believe were due to cefepime toxicity. Following the first seizure, we took serial measurements of plasma cefepime levels, and a single measurement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cefepime level. The peak plasma cefepime concentration was 73.8 µg/mL (minimum inhibitory concentration of target enterobacteriaceae is 8 µg/mL) and the CSF level was 6.1 µg/mL. The patient had four seizures during the period of high plasma cefepime concentration, but no more episodes once the drug level decreased to non-toxic levels. This case highlights the difficulty in predicting pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, particularly those receiving renal replacement therapy. We suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients may be a useful intervention to avoid antibiotic-related toxicities.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Drug Monitoring; Hemofiltration; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pneumonia; Seizures; Shock, Septic

Cefepime has been associated with a greater risk of mortality than other beta-lactams in patients treated for severe sepsis. Hypotheses for this failure include possible hidden side-effects (for example, neurological) or inappropriate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters for bacteria with cefepime minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) at the highest limits of susceptibility (8 mg/l) or intermediate-resistance (16 mg/l) for pathogens such as Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. We examined these issues in a prospective non-interventional study of 21 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) adult patients treated with cefepime for nosocomial pneumonia.. Patients (median age 55.1 years, range 21.8 to 81.2) received intravenous cefepime at 2 g every 12 hours for creatinine clearance (CLCr) >or= 50 ml/min, and 2 g every 24 hours or 36 hours for CLCr < 50 ml/minute. Cefepime plasma concentrations were determined at several time-points before and after drug administration by high-pressure liquid chromatography. PK/PD parameters were computed by standard non-compartmental analysis.. Seventeen first-doses and 11 steady states (that is, four to six days after the first dose) were measured. Plasma levels varied greatly between individuals, from two- to three-fold at peak-concentrations to up to 40-fold at trough-concentrations. Nineteen out of 21 (90%) patients had PK/PD parameters comparable to literature values. Twenty-one of 21 (100%) patients had appropriate duration of cefepime concentrations above the MIC (T>MIC >or= 50%) for the pathogens recovered in this study (MIC or= 8 mg/l. Moreover, 2/21 (10%) patients with renal impairment (CLCr < 30 ml/minute) demonstrated accumulation of cefepime in the plasma (trough concentrations of 20 to 30 mg/l) in spite of dosage adjustment. Both had symptoms compatible with non-convulsive epilepsy (confusion and muscle jerks) that were not attributed to cefepime-toxicity until plasma levels were disclosed to the caretakers and symptoms resolved promptly after drug arrest.. These empirical results confirm the suspected risks of hidden side-effects and inappropriate PK/PD parameters (for pathogens with upper-limit MICs) in a population of ICU adult patients. Moreover, it identifies a safety and efficacy window for cefepime doses of 2 g every 12 hours in patients with a CLCr >or= 50 ml/minute infected by pathogens with cefepime MICs

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Europe; Female; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Pneumonia; Prospective Studies; Young Adult

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Betamethasone; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Humans; Male; Pneumonia; Radiography, Thoracic; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of bacterial and fungal pneumonia in lung transplant (LT) recipients and to assess donor-to-host transmission of these microorganisms.. We retrospectively studied all positive cultures from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of 49 lung transplant recipients and their donors from August 2003 to April 2007.. There were 108 episodes of pneumonia during a medium follow-up of 412 days (range, 1-1328 days). The most frequent microorganisms were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 36; 33.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 29; 26.8%), and Aspergillus spp. (n = 18; 16%). Other fungal infections were due to Fusarium spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Of the 31 donors with positive BAL, 15 had S. aureus. There were 21 pretransplant colonized recipients (43%) and 16 of them had suppurative underlying lung disease. P. aeruginosa was the most frequent colonizing organism (59% of pretransplant positive cultures). There were 11 episodes of bacteremia and lungs were the source in 5 cases. Sixteen deaths occurred and 6 (37.5%) were due to infection. Statistical analyses showed association between pretransplant colonizing microorganisms from suppurative lung disease patients and pneumonias after lung transplantation (RR = 4.76; P = .04; 95% CI = 1.02-22.10). No other analyzed factor was significant.. Bacterial and fungal infections are frequent and contribute to higher mortality in lung transplant recipients. P. aeruginosa is the most frequent agent of respiratory infections. This study did not observe any impact of donor lung organisms on pneumonia after lung transplantation. Nevertheless, we demonstrated an association between pretransplant colonizing microorganisms and early pneumonias in suppurative lung transplant recipients.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antiviral Agents; Candidiasis; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Humans; Lung Transplantation; Mycoses; Patient Selection; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Female; Geriatric Assessment; Humans; Male; Pneumonia; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of antimicrobial agents against pulmonary infections depends on their local concentrations in the lung. The aims of the present study were to: 1) compare technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) and urea as markers of epithelial lining fluid (ELF) dilution for measuring ELF concentrations of pharmaceuticals; 2) quantify ELF cefepime concentrations in normal and injured lung; and 3) measure the increase in permeability to cefepime following oleic acid-induced acute lung injury. A modified bronchoalveolar lavage technique, based on equilibration of infused 99mTc-DTPA, was used to measure ELF volume. Cefepime was administered intravenously at steady plasma levels. Six serial bronchoalveolar lavages were performed 5 h after the beginning of infusion. ELF to plasma cefepime concentration ratios were 95 +/- 17 and 100 +/- 14.5% in normal and injured lung respectively. When urea was used as marker, cefepime concentration ratios were underestimated at 16.4 +/- 2.7 and 73.9 +/- 8.4% respectively. Cefepime blood/ airspace clearance increased from 3.8 +/- 0.7 micro x min(-1) in controls to 39.8 +/- 4.9 microL x min(-1) in acute lung injury. It was concluded that: 1) cefepime concentrations in epithelial lining fluid were in equilibrium with those in plasma in both normal and injured lung after 5 h at steady plasma concentrations; 2) epithelial lining fluid cefepime concentration by the urea method was much less underestimated in injured versus normal lung; and 3) acute lung injury induces a 10-fold elevation of cefepime blood/airspace clearance.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Biological Availability; Biological Transport, Active; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Epithelium; Female; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Pneumonia; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity; Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate; Urea

Neurotoxicity is an unusual complication of cephalosporin therapy. Only few cases of neurotoxicity induced by Cefepime have been described and probably the frequency of Cefepime-induced status epilepticus is underestimated. We report a case of an 82 year-old male, ESRD patient on chronic hemodialysis program affected by pneumonia, who received a treatment with intravenous Cefepime (1 g/day) and developed a seizure 4 days after the starting antibiotic therapy. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity was suspected and its administration was immediately discontinued. In order to increase Cefepime clearance a hemodialysis session was urgently started and an improvement of his conscious level was observed. On the following day, after a second hemodialysis session his clinical condition and the status of neurotoxicity were completely recovered. The patient was discharged from the hospital in stable clinical condition one week later. At variance with the cases previously reported, the daily dose of Cefepime administrated to our patient was 50% lower and respected drug prescription dosage. Thus, we speculate on the hypothesis that advanced age of our patient and metabolic encephalopathy induced by chronic uremia made him more sensitive to the neurotoxicity induced by the drug. In conclusion, our case suggests that, in very old patients on long-term hemodialysis, it should be considered, to avoid neurotoxicity, to monitor the clinical neurological status, to use Cefepime at lower dosage than that allowed in patients with severe renal impairment (1 g/day) and, when possible, to evaluate Cefepime plasma levels. However, in these patients, other agents of the same class should be considered such as Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone which are characterized by both an hepatic and renal excretion. In alternative to cephalosporins, antibiotics with the same action spectrum in the absence of neurological toxicity (i.e. Meropenem) should be recommended.

Topics: Aged; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Confusion; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Pneumonia; Renal Dialysis

Topics: Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia

Topics: Cefepime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Community-Acquired Infections; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pneumonia

The antibacterial activities of human regimens of cefepime, ceftazidime, and imipenem alone or in combination with amikacin against an isogenic pair of Enterobacter cloacae strains (wild type and its corresponding derepressed cephalosporinase mutant) were compared by using our nonlethal model of pneumonia with 180 immunocompetent rats. Compared with untreated animals, all beta-lactam-treated rats, except those inoculated with the mutant isolate and receiving ceftazidime, had significantly lower bacterial counts in their lungs 60 h after the onset of therapy. Although the combination of a beta-lactam and amikacin was more bactericidal than each corresponding antimicrobial agent alone, true synergy was noted only with cefepime and imipenem against the constitutive derepressed strain.

Topics: Amikacin; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterobacter cloacae; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Imipenem; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pneumonia; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Thienamycins