cefepime and Pneumonia--Aspiration

cefepime has been researched along with Pneumonia--Aspiration* in 4 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for cefepime and Pneumonia--Aspiration

ArticleYear
Cefepime vs. meropenem for moderate-to-severe pneumonia in patients at risk for aspiration: An open-label, randomized study.
    Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Treatment of aspiration pneumonia is an important problem due to aging of populations worldwide. However, the effectiveness of cefepime in aspiration pneumonia has not yet been evaluated.. To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cefepime and meropenem in patients with moderate-to-severe aspiration pneumonia.. In this open-label, randomized study, either cefepime 1 g or meropenem 0.5 g was administered intravenously every 8 h to patients with moderate-to-severe community-acquired or nursing-home acquired pneumonia at risk for aspiration for an average of 10.5 days. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate at the end of treatment (EOT) in the validated per-protocol (VPP)-population. Secondary outcomes were clinical response during treatment (days 4 and 7) and at the end of study (EOS) in the VPP-population, and survival at day 30 in the modified intention-to-treat (MITT)-population.. There was no difference between the groups in the primary or secondary outcomes or safety. Significant improvement was observed in each group on day 4.. Cefepime is as effective and safe as meropenem in the treatment of moderate-to-severe aspiration pneumonia.. UMIN000001349.

    Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross Infection; Female; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

2020
Cefepime/clindamycin vs. ceftriaxone/clindamycin for the empiric treatment of poisoned patients with aspiration pneumonia.
    Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2008, Volume: 79, Issue:2

    Different antimicrobial treatments have proved to be effective in patients with aspiration pneumonia. However, resistant bacterial strains are commonly observed in hospital settings challenging the empirical treatment of these patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of cefepime/clindamycin and ceftriaxone/clindamycin for empiric therapy of poisoned patients with aspiration pneumonia. In an open, randomized, prospective design, 140 consecutive patients aged more than 13 years, with radiographic signs of infiltration in chest radiography and dullness on percussion or pulmonary rales or ronchi in combination with at least two of the following clinical criteria were considered as eligible: fever > or = 37 degrees C (axillary), or hypothermia < 35 degrees C (axillary) and leukocytosis (> 10 cells/mm3), or leukopenia (< 3,000 cells/mm3), a left-shift of > 10%, or purulent sputum or secretion from trachea or bronchi. Participants received intravenously either ceftriaxone 1 g q12 h and clindamycin 900 mg q8 h (group 1) or cefepime 1 g q12 h and clindamycin 900 mg q8 h (group 2). On day 5 of treatment, the number of improved/cured patients was not different between groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.24 to 2.90) nor at 14 days of the study (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.12 to 3.29). Six patients died in group 1 and 5 in group 2 (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.28 to 2.46). In conclusion, efficacy of empiric treatment of poisoned patients with aspiration pneumonia with ceftriaxone/clindamycin was comparable to treatment with cefepime/clindamycin.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Clindamycin; Drug Combinations; Empirical Research; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Prospective Studies

2008

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for cefepime and Pneumonia--Aspiration

ArticleYear
Cefepime challenge after piperacillin/tazobactam-induced thrombocytopenia.
    Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019, Volume: 48, Issue:1

    Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) has been described as a sudden and severe hematologic complication of piperacillin/tazobactam. The proposed mechanism by which piperacillin/tazobactam causes DITP involves the formation of a covalent bond to platelet membrane protein thereby inducing a humoral immune response. Given the immunogenic nature of this adverse event and the structural similarities across beta-lactam antibiotics, the potential for cross-reactivity between agents within the class should be considered. However, the structural moiety of piperacillin/tazobactam responsible for this immunogenic response has not been identified-the relationship between structure and activity for this phenomenon remains unknown. Data on the safety and cross-reactivity of other beta-lactam agents in this setting is lacking. We report the first case of piperacillin/tazobactam DITP successfully challenged by the use of cefepime for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. Further studies are needed to determine the structural moiety of piperacillin/tazobactam responsible for this immunogenic response and evaluate the safety of other beta-lactam antibiotics in this clinical setting.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Female; Humans; Immunity, Humoral; Male; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Tazobactam; Thrombocytopenia

2019
Antibiotic use in nursing home-acquired pneumonia.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007, Volume: 55, Issue:11

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftriaxone; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Utilization; Homes for the Aged; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Nursing Homes; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Survival Rate; Treatment Failure

2007