cefepime and Lymphoma

To check the effectiveness of ticarcillin clavulanate versus cefepime as monotherapy in febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients and also to check tolerability profile of both drugs.. We randomly assigned 107 neutropenic patients to receive either cefepime or ticarcillin/clavulanate. The clinical efficacy and tolerability profile of both drugs were compared using either cefepime or ticarcillin clavulanate (TC) as an empirical treatment for management of febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients only with same characteristics at time of presentation.. A significant difference in efficacy of the two treatment arms was noted. A successful outcome was reported with 28 (51%) out of 55 in cefepime arm compared to 16 (42%) out of 52 patients in ticarcillin/clavulanate group (p = 0.35; 95% Confidence). The distribution of time for defervesence was estimated for each treatment group and a trend to a shorter time for defervesence was found in the CEFEPIME group (48.4 hour for cefepime, 58.28 hour for TC group; p = 0.018). For microbiologically documented infections, the successful eradication rate was 49% (6 of 14 patients) for TC group as compared to 83% (10 of 12 patients) for cefepime group. This difference was statistically significant for microbiologically documented infections. Twenty seven (52%) patients of TC group and 19 (35%) of cefepime group required modifications of antibiotic regimen. The most frequent modifications consisted of the addition of either an amino glycoside (amikacin) or glycopeptides (vancomycin).. CEFEPIME regimen was more effective than TC regimen, with a consistent trend toward a better outcome associated with cefepime compared to Ticarcillin/clavulanate.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Clavulanic Acid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Ticarcillin; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

1998, a consensus meeting was held in Miyazaki, Japan, to develop an approach to management of febrile neutropenia (FN). The K-HOT study group decided to examine whether this proposal was applicable to clinical practice in a multicenter study. Patients who developed fever with neutrophil counts <1,000/microL were randomized to receive either a single antibiotic, cefepime or one of the carbapenems, or a combination of cefepime and an aminoglycoside. Patients who became afebrile within the first 3 days were continued on the same treatment. Patients who remained febrile were switched to a combination regimen if they were randomized to receive a single agent, and patients on combination medication were changed from cefepime to another cephalosporin. A total of 165 patients were entered into the trial. One hundred fifty-three patients were evaluable for response. The average age was 52 years, and 70% of the patients had acute leukemia. Severe neutropenia, defined as <100/microL at the time of FN, was seen in 62% of the patients on entry and during the course of treatment 71% of patients experienced neutrophil counts of <100/microL. Microbiologically documented infection was seen in 6.5% for monotherapy, and 10.5% for a combination treatment, and fever of unknown origin occurred in 75.3% and 59.2% of the patients in each regimen, respectively. Excellent to good response was seen in two-thirds of the patients in all treatment groups. Adverse events were minimal, and three early deaths were observed at days 9, 16, and 16 among patients treated with a single antibiotic and three in the combination regimen group at days 14, 15, and 20. These results indicate that cefepime or a carbapenem alone is as effective as a combination of cefepime and an aminoglycoside for treating FN.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Male; Neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia is one of the most frequent complications in intensively treated hematooncological patients and almost inevitably occurs after high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is indicated in the initial management. Fourth-generation cephalosporins are the option. This retrospective study was initiated to assess efficacy and safety of cefepime as an empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia following high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.. 319 high dose therapy procedures with autologous stem cell transplantation in 287 patients mostly with hematological malignancies were performed at our department between January 2002 and December 2005. We present analysis of 169 out of 229 febrile episodes in 163 patients (median age 53) being treated with cefepime in the initial empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia. 12 episodes (7.1 %) were clinically documented (pneumonia 9, sinusitis 2, acute cholecystitis 1), 60 (35.5 %) were confirmed microbiologically (presented as bacteremia) and 97 (57.4 %) were fever of unknown origin. 50 isolates (83.4 %) out of 60 microbiologically documented infections were G-positive bacteria, 8 isolates (13.3 %) were G-negative bacteria and 2 (3.3 %) were mixed G-positive and G-negative cultures. According to the MASCC score 14 episodes were assessed as high risk. Effect of cefepime as a single agent was observed in 85 episodes (50.3 %) and in 22 (13.0 %) episodes treated with combination therapy due to susceptibility of isolated pathogen in blood culture. Combination therapy of two antibiotics (cefepime + aminoglycoside or glycopeptide) given for persistent fever was effective in 13 patients (7.7 %). Treatment failure was observed in 48 (28.4 %) episodes, we registered 10 death.. Therapy with cefepime represents an appropriate choice for empiric antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia in hematooncological patients. Cefepime demonstrates clinical safety and efficacy and can be used in monotherapy or in combination with other drugs (overall response 72.2 %, as a single agent 50.3 %).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Fever; Humans; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Stem Cell Transplantation

In a prospective observational study of 133 neutropenic episodes, interleukin (IL)-8 serum levels > 2000 pg/mL at the onset of fever had a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 97% as a predictor of gram-negative bacteremia (GNB; positive predictive value, 73%; negative predictive value, 94%). The rates of early death differed significantly between patients with high and those with low IL-8 levels (3/11 vs. 1/122; P< .01). Serum IL-8 levels at the onset of fever define a low-risk subgroup of patients who can safely be treated with monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bacteremia; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Interleukin-8; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies