cefepime and Febrile-Neutropenia

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are among the most frequent complications in neutropenic cancer patients and, if caused by Gram-negative rods, are associated with high mortality. Thus, fever during neutropenia warrants prompt empirical antibiotic therapy which should be active against the most frequent Gram-negatives. In the last decade, there has been a worldwide increase in multidrug resistant (MDR) strains. In these cases, the traditional choices such as oral therapy, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or even carbapenems, might be ineffective. Therefore novel de-escalation approach has been proposed for patients who are at high risk for infections due to MDR bacteria. It consists of starting antibiotics which cover the most probable resistant strain but it is narrowed down after 72 hours if no MDR pathogen is isolated. With increasing bacterial resistance, the benefit of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during prolonged neutropenia remains to be confirmed. Antibiotic stewardship and infection control programs are mandatory in every cancer center.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Disease Management; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Febrile Neutropenia; Fluoroquinolones; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Risk Factors

Timely administration of appropriate empirical antibiotics in febrile neutropenia is crucial for favourable patient outcomes. There are guidelines in place recommending such antibiotics. However, regional variations and local epidemiological data must be evaluated to tailor the antibiotics for best possible and rational use. In this study, we audited the clinical and microbiological data of febrile neutropenic episodes occurring at a tertiary care haematology institution. Three hundred and ninety-three febrile neutropenic episodes occurring in 123 patients over a 1-year period were analysed for microbial profile, sensitivity and resistance patterns, and finally clinical outcomes. Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) blood stream infections (46.9%) were more prevalent as compared to gram-positive infections (41.9%). Overall mortality due to complicated neutropenic sepsis was 19.5% (24/123 patients). Increased resistance to carbapenems, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and cephalosporins were observed. Cefepime and tigecycline resistance were seen in 20% and 15% GNB isolates, respectively. Chest was the most frequent focus of infection, and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was the most common underlying disorder which correlated with the likelihood of death (p < 0.01). Multidrug-resistant GNB (esp. Klebsiella sp.) are still most worrisome isolates in neutropenic patients. Single-agent cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam/tigecycline combination may be considered empirical agents. Chest infections and AML were independent predictors of poor clinical outcome in neutropenic patients. Regular audit of infections and antibiotic susceptibility data is needed to improve clinical outcomes in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cefepime; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; India; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Middle Aged; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies; Tigecycline

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Empirical Research; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate clinically the efficacy and safety in northern India of cefepime monotherapy versus piperacillin-tazobactam in patients of paediatric age group with febrile neutropenia.. Children aged ≤18 years admitted febrile with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were randomised into two groups comprising 20 cases in each group viz. CEF (receiving cefepime only) and PIP-TAZO (receiving piperacillin-tazobactam). Based on clinical and laboratory tests, patients were classified into: microbiologically documented infections (MDI); clinically documented infections (CDI); and unexplained fever (UF). They were assessed for clinical signs and symptoms as well as laboratory parameters at the time of enrolment and subsequently on days 3 and 7.. Incidence of MDI, CDI and UF were 22.5%, 47.5% and 30%, respectively. The mean duration of neutropenia (in days) was 5.45 ± 2.1 in the PIP-TAZO group and 5.5 ± 1.5 in the CEF group (P = 0.305). The success rate defined as clearing infection effectively and improvement of neutropenia was comparable (P = 0.705). There was a mortality rate of 20% in the PIP-TAZO group as compared to 10% in the CEF group.. We conclude that cefepime monotherapy and piperacillin-tazobactam are equally efficacious and safe in treating patients with febrile neutropenia. Empirical monotherapy with cefepime would prevent an unnecessary extra economic burden as well as avoiding the serious adverse or toxic effects of multi-drug regimes, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Fever; Humans; India; Male; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Tertiary Care Centers; Treatment Outcome

Febrile neutropenia frequently develops after chemotherapy. There is little evidence to indicate the type of antimicrobial agents that should be used in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors. The objective is to determine the efficacy and safety of cefepime (CFPM) and meropenem (MEPM) in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in lung cancer patients in a prospective randomized study. FN patients with lung cancer were randomly divided into CFPM or MEPM groups. The primary end-point was the response rate. The secondary end-points were the defervescence rates at 72 h, 7 days, 14 days and the incidence of adverse events. Twenty-one patients were treated with CFPM and 24 patients were treated with MEPM. One patient died of FN. The CFPM treatment completion rate was 17.65% (95% CI; 0.00-35.77%), while the MEPM treatment completion rate was 38.10% (95% CI; 17.33-58.87%). The defervescence rates at 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days were 70.59%, 86.67%, and 100.00%, respectively in the CFPM group; and 65.00%, 84.21%, and 92.31% in the MEPM group. Adverse events were observed in 33.33% of the CFPM group and 45.83% of the MEPM group. The response rate of the CFPM group was 94.12% (95% CI; 73.02-98.95%), while that of the MEPM group was 85.71% (95% CI; 65.36-95.02%). No differences were found in the efficacy or safety of CFPM and MEPM in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with lung cancer.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) or cefepime (CFPM) monotherapy for febrile neutropenia (FN) in children, a total of 53 patients with 213 febrile episodes were randomly treated with either PIPC/TAZ 337.5 mg/kg/day, or CFPM 100 mg/kg/day. No significant differences were observed in the success rates of the PIPC/TAZ and CFPM treatments (62.1% vs. 59.1%, P = 0.650). Furthermore, no differences were noted in the rates of new infection and mortality, and no serious adverse effects occurred in either of groups. Both PIPC/TAZ and CFPM were effective and safe as an empirical therapy for FN in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:356-358. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Young Adult

While guidelines recommend empirical cefepime therapy in febrile neutropenia, the mortality benefit of cefepime has been controversial. In light of this, recent reports on pharmacokinetic changes for several antibiotics in febrile neutropenia and the consequent suboptimal exposure call for a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of current dosing. This study aimed to assess pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment from a 2-g intravenous (i.v.) every 8 h (q8h) cefepime regimen in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Cefepime plasma concentrations were measured in the 3rd, 6th, and 9th dosing intervals at 60% of the interval and/or trough point. The selected pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets were the proportion of the dosing interval (60% and 100%) for which the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (fT>MIC). Target attainment was assessed in reference to the MIC of isolated organisms if available or empirical breakpoints if not. The percentage of fT>MIC was also estimated by log-linear regression analysis. All patients achieved >60% fT>MIC in the 3rd and 6th dosing intervals. A 100% fT>MIC was not attained in 6/12, 4/10, and 4/9 patients in the 3rd, 6th, and 9th dose intervals, respectively, or in 14/31 (45%) of the dosing intervals investigated. On the other hand, 29/31 (94%) of trough concentrations were at or above 4 mg/liter. In conclusion, for patients with normal renal function, a high-dose 2-g i.v. q8h cefepime regimen appears to provide appropriate exposure if the MIC of the organism is ≤4 mg/liter but may fail to cover less susceptible organisms.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent, serious complication of intensive pediatric chemotherapy regimens. The aim of this trial was to compare quality of life (QOL) between inpatient and outpatient intravenous antibiotic management of children and adolescents with low risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN).. In this randomised non-blinded trial, patients between 1 and 21 years old, receiving low/moderate intensity chemotherapy were pre-consented and, on presentation to emergency (ED) with FN satisfying low risk criteria, randomised to either outpatient or inpatient care with intravenous cefepime 50 mg/kg (12 hourly). All patients continued antibiotics for at least 48 hours, until afebrile for 24 hours and demonstrating a rising absolute neutrophil count ≥200/mm(3). Several domains of QOL were examined by daily questionnaire.. Eighty-one patients presented to ED with 159 episodes of fever. Thirty-seven FN presentations involving 27 patients were randomised to inpatient (18) and outpatient (19) management. Combined QOL mean scores for parents were higher for the outpatient group and scores for three specific parent variables (keeping up with household tasks/time spent with partner/time spent with other children) were higher among outpatients. There was no difference in parent confidence/satisfaction in care between groups. Patients scored better in the outpatient group overall and for sleep and appetite. The mean length of fever was equivalent between groups and there were no serious adverse events attributable to cefepime or outpatient care.. Outpatient cefepime management of LRFN provided significant benefit to parents and patients across several QOL domains and appeared both feasible and safe.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Neoplasms; Outpatients; Quality of Life; Risk Factors

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common and serious complication of cancer chemotherapy associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Cefozopran (CZOP) is a potential candidate for empirical monotherapy in FN. However, studies on the use of CZOP as empirical treatment for pediatric patients with FN are quite limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CZOP with cefepime (CFPM) empirical monotherapy in pediatric cancer patients with FN.. A total of 64 patients with 224 episodes of FN were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy with either CZOP (100 mg/kg/day) or CFPM (100 mg/kg/day). Of these episodes, 223 were considered eligible for the study. Success was defined as resolution of febrile episodes and clinical signs of infection within 120 hr following the start of antibiotic therapy.. The success rate was not significantly different between the CZOP (64.0%) and CFPM (56.3%) groups (P = 0.275). Duration of fever, duration of antibiotic therapy, and the success rate in patients with blood stream infection did not differ between the two groups. There was no infection-related mortality in the study period.. Both CZOP and CFPM as monotherapy appear to be effective and safe in pediatric patients. This study suggests that CZOP has satisfactory efficacy and is well tolerated as initial empirical therapy for pediatric cancer patients with FN.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cefozopran; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Neoplasms

The potential for cefepime prophylaxis to reduce bloodstream infections (BSIs) in pediatric patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) has been incompletely characterized.. A retrospective quasi-experimental study of patients under 21 years of age admitted with AML from 2010 through 2018 at two affiliated pediatric tertiary-care hospitals before and after the adoption of routine cefepime prophylaxis for afebrile AML patients during profound neutropenia.. The rate of BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group than the baseline group (2.6 vs 15.5, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32). Interrupted time-series analysis showed that a sharp reduction in BSIs coincided with the implementation of prophylaxis. Bacteremia with viridans group streptococci was frequent in the baseline group but not observed after adopting prophylaxis. Despite the increased use of cefepime, the rate of cefepime-nonsusceptible BSIs per 1000 neutropenia days decreased (1.6 vs 4.1, IRR 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.99). The median number of febrile neutropenia episodes per patient also decreased in the prophylaxis group, as did the proportion of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (22/51 (43.1%) vs 26/38 (68.4%); risk difference -25.3%, 95% CI -44.4 to -2.8). A trend was observed toward an increased proportion of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection in the prophylaxis group (10/51 (19.6%) vs 3/38 (7.9%); risk difference 11.7%, 95% CI -3.4 to 29.0).. Cefepime prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in BSIs, febrile neutropenia, and ICU admission among pediatric AML patients.

Topics: Cefepime; Child; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Retrospective Studies; Sepsis

Generally national guidelines for febrile neutropenia recommend treatment with cefepime 2 g every 8 h. Due to beta-lactam's time dependent killing effects, it is hypothesized smaller doses given more frequently might be non-inferior. The objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of cefepime 1 g every 6 h versus 2 g every 8 h in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.. This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included patients with a diagnosis of febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime during an inpatient encounter. Patients were grouped based on receipt of cefepime 2 g every 8 h (high dose cohort) versus cefepime 1 g every 6 h (low dose cohort). The primary outcome compared the time to defervescence after cefepime initiation between the two dosing strategies. A subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint was conducted in patients who received both cefepime and vancomycin.. Ninety-seven patients were included in the high dose cohort, and seventy-six patients were included in the low dose cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the exception of race. The time to defervescence between the high dose cohort and low dose cohort were comparable between groups (49.2 vs. 46.7 h). The time to defervescence in subgroup analysis of patients who received empiric vancomycin and cefepime was 65.7 versus 59.7.. Patients who received cefepime 1 g every 6 h were found to have similar trends in achieving time to defervescence compared to 2 g every 8 h.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cohort Studies; Febrile Neutropenia; Fever; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Vancomycin

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious side effect in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy and frequently proves fatal. Since infection control is crucial in the management of FN, the antimicrobial agent cefozopran (CZOP) has been recommended but not approved for routine use in clinical care of FN in Japan. However, few studies of CZOP in the management of FN have used a thrice daily dose schedule. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of CZOP at a dose of 1 g three times daily to those of cefepime (CFPM) in the treatment of FN in our lung cancer patients. The response rates of the CZOP and CFPM groups were 89.5% (17/19 cases) and 83.0% (39/47 cases), respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. The median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 6 days (4-10 days) in the CZOP group and 7 days (3-13 days) in the CFPM group, with no significant difference between groups. The incidence rates of adverse events were 21.1% (4/19 cases) in the CZOP group and 19.1% (9/47 cases) in the CFPM group. No adverse events of Grade 3 or higher were observed in either group. The findings of the present study suggest that CZOP administration at a dose of 1 g three times per day as an antimicrobial treatment alternative against FN.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cefozopran; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurs in up to 80% of patients with hematologic malignancies. Evidence suggests using extended infusions (EI) of beta-lactams can improve outcomes in some populations, but there is limited clinical literature comparing cefepime standard infusion (SI) versus EI for FN. The FDA-approved regimen for FN was used at a large community teaching hospital for patients with FN until a hospital-wide EI beta-lactam protocol was introduced that allowed for EI cefepime in FN at the physicians' discretion. We sought to compare outcomes between patients with FN who received SI and EI cefepime.. Patients with acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia who developed FN between April 2014 and January 2021 were included in this single-center, retrospective study. The primary outcome was to compare mean time to defervescence after the initiation of cefepime SI or EI regimens. SI regimens consisted of IV cefepime 2G q8h/0.5 h, and EI regimens as IV cefepime 1G q8h/4 h. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of cefepime, and need to escalate therapy.. Overall, 193 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Time to defervescence was significantly shorter with EI compared with the SI group (median 48 h [48-100.5] vs. 70 h [48-113], p = 0.005). Cefepime duration of therapy was significantly shorter in the EI compared with the SI group (median 6.0 days vs. 8.0 days, p = 0.002). There was no difference between other secondary outcomes including LOS, mortality, and antibiotic escalation.. Despite reduced total daily dose of cefepime, EI cefepime administered as a 1G/0.5 h LD followed 2 h later by 1G q8h/4 h for FN acutely achieves more rapid defervescence than the FDA-approved SI regimen and ultimately attains comparable patient outcomes.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Retrospective Studies

Drug shortages may negatively impact outcomes in hospitalized patients. A cefepime dosing regimen of 1 gram every 6 hours (1 g q6h) has shown to provide similar exposures above target minimum inhibitory concentrations compared to the regimen of 2 g q8h approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for febrile neutropenia. Our objective was to determine if the dosing regimen of 1 g q6h amidst a cefepime shortage is an appropriate alternative for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.. A retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients who received cefepime for febrile neutropenia over a two-year period was performed. Patients were grouped based on cefepime dosing strategy: 2 g q8h vs. 1 g q6h. The primary objective was to compare time to defervescence after cefepime initiation. Secondary objectives included all-cause 30-day mortality, duration of antibiotic therapy, and inpatient length of stay.. Our study identified no differences in clinical outcomes with cefepime 1 g q6h compared to the traditional FDA-approved 2 g q8h regimen for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Drug Administration Schedule; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Mortality; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors

Topics: Adult; Azithromycin; Cefepime; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Immunocompromised Host; Kidney Transplantation; SARS-CoV-2; Transplant Recipients

Nephrotoxic medication exposure and associated acute kidney injury (AKI) occur commonly in hospitalized children. At Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, there is an initiative to increase awareness of nephrotoxic medication exposure and decrease rates of associated AKI. The oncology service utilized these data in a quality improvement project to drive reductions in AKI rates.. Three interventions were implemented targeted at decreasing the incidence of nephrotoxic exposure, as well as protecting against the conversion of exposures to AKI episodes. Cefepime replaced piperacillin-tazobactam for febrile neutropenia, vancomycin stewardship limited empiric courses to 72 hours, and nephroprotection for intravenous contrast administration was standardized for defined high-risk patients.. The study cohort comprised 42 520 noncritically ill patient days admitted to the oncology service at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. A total of 273 unique patients were exposed to combination nephrotoxic medications, leading to 111 AKI episodes. The rate of nephrotoxic medication exposure within the oncology service decreased by 49% from 16.08 to 8.17 per 1000 patient days. Episodes of AKI associated with nephrotoxic medication exposure decreased by 45% from 3.48 to 1.92 per 1000 patient days.. Interventions to decrease AKI took a three-pronged approach. Collectively, this approach was proven successful with significant reductions in both rates of nephrotoxic medication exposure and associated AKI among hospitalized oncology patients.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adolescent; Cefepime; Child; Child, Preschool; Databases, Factual; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Neoplasms; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies; Vancomycin

Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Sepsis; Tazobactam; Thienamycins; Tobramycin

Infection 'is a common complication in children with hematological malignancies' during febrile neutropenia. '. The aim of this study was to' evaluate common bacterial and fungal pathogens in children with hematological malignancies during febrile neutropenia in single center Egyptian study. '. This study was carried out on 90' children with hematological malignancies during febrile neutropenia including 54 with ALL, 27 with AML and 9 with NHL with their ages ranging from 2.5- 13 years and mean age value of 5.5 ± 3.5. Complete blood count, BM aspiration, and blood and throat cultures were done for all patients.. Positive bacterial growth was found in 54 cultures (30%) including 42 blood cultures and 12 throat cultures with significantly higher Gram negative bacterial growth. Staphylococcus aurous and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most common Gram positive and negative organisms respectively. Cefepime was the most effective antibiotic against isolated bacterial growth where 80% of Gram negative bacterial growth was sensitive to it, 20% showed intermediate response and no Gram negative Cefepime resistance was recorded. On the other hand, 62.5% of Gram positive organisms was sensitive to it, 25% showed intermediate response and Gram positive Cefepime resistance was found in 12.5%. Ampicillin sulbactam 'was the most effective antibiotic against Gram positive' organisms with 100% sensitivity. Positive fungal growth was found in 36 cultures (20%) including 30 throat cultures and 6 blood cultures and all fungal isolates were candida. Amphotericin was active against 100% of fungal isolates, while resistance to Fluconazole and Voriconazole was found in 25% and 33.33% respectively.. 'Gram negative is still more common than gram positive' infections and fungal infection is also a common cause of fever in patients with hematological malignancies during neutropenia and must be taken in consideration in every case of febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antifungal Agents; Bacteremia; Blood Cell Count; Candida; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Egypt; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Fungi; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Pharynx; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus

To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of standard cefepime dosing regimens in a hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant patient population with febrile neutropenia.. Open-label, single-center, prospective pharmacokinetic study.. National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.. Nine adults with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic cell transplants who had febrile neutropenia and were admitted to a hematology-oncology service between January and July 2014.. Patients received empirical cefepime 2 g every 8 hours, administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion, for febrile neutropenia.. Steady-state cefepime serum concentrations were measured after at least 2 days of continuous therapy. Venous blood samples were intensively sampled between 0 and 8 hours after the start of the 30-minute infusion at steady state. Seven of the nine patients had a hematologic malignancy diagnosis of acute leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma, and two patients had a germ cell tumor diagnosis. Noncompartmental analysis revealed mean ± SD parameters as follows at steady state: area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-8 hours 222.9 ± 72.9 mg hour/L, maximum concentration 120.9 ± 21.8 mg/L, clearance 9.7 ± 3.7 L/hour, apparent volume of distribution 19.2 ± 4.65 L, and elimination half-life 1.4 ± 0.3 hours. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model identified a mean ± SD volume of distribution of 20.9 ± 1.3 L and an elimination rate constant of 0.39 ± 0.03 hour(-1) . The mean estimated percentage of time that drug concentration remains above the pathogen minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) in serum was 55%, 77%, and 99% at MICs of 16, 8, and 4 mg/L, respectively.. Patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic cell transplants who had febrile neutropenia demonstrated homogeneous calculated cefepime volumes and clearances. The population parameters presented in this study may aid in the calculation of patient-specific fT>MIC for similar patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Prospective Studies

The efficacy of cefepime (CFPM) is known to depend on the ratio of the time that the serum levels exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to the dosing interval (%T>MIC). The objective of this study was to clarify the relation between %T>MIC and clinical outcome of CFPM, and to identify the optimal dosage regimen. We investigated the outcome of CFPM treatment for febrile neutropenia (FN) patients with normal renal function. Treatment success was defined as the completion of FN therapy with CFPM only. And we calculated %T>MIC for each case based on population pharmacokinetic parameters. The MIC value for simulation was set as 8 μg/mL. In logistic regression analysis, treatment success was significantly associated with the elevation of %T>MIC in the group with persistent neutropenia, yielding a receiver operating characteristic curve with an optimal cutoff value of 73.1%. Next, we simulated %T>MIC for each case under various dosing regimens. For patients whose creatinine clearance (CLcr) exceeded 100 mL/min, it was found to be difficult to attain the objective under the current regimen. In contrast, it was calculated that treatment with 2 g three times a day (t.i.d.) could attain the objective for most of the patients with 3 h of infusion. These results suggest that CFPM treatment under the current regimen is ineffective for FN patients with normal or augmented renal function, and that 2 g t.i.d. is necessary in quite a lot cases, although such use is off-label.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes of bacteremia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and their antibiotic susceptibilities in febrile neutropenic children. Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and antibiotic susceptibilities were reviewed and compared between febrile neutropenic children with bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae. A total of 61 episodes of E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia, including 21 episodes (34.4%) due to ESBL-producing strains, were diagnosed. There was no significant factor associated with bacteremia by ESBL-producing strains. Empirical antibiotics were appropriate in 85.7% of the ESBL group and 95.0% of the non-ESBL group. In the entire study population, seven deaths (11.5%), including three deaths (4.9%) due to E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia, occurred. The complication and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Antibiotic susceptibility rates were significantly lower in the ESBL group than in the non-ESBL group in most antibiotics. Although 52.4% and 66.7% of the ESBL-producing isolates were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, respectively, 96.7% of all the isolates and 90.5% of the ESBL-producing isolates were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime in combination with aminoglycoside. In conclusion, the ESBL group did not show a significantly unfavorable outcome, and empirical therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime in combination with aminoglycoside might be more useful for febrile neutropenic children, instead of β-lactam monotherapy in institutions with high prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; beta-Lactamases; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies

This study was performed to compare the clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibilities of viridans streptococcal bacteremia (VSB) between febrile neutropenic adults and children with hematologic malignancies.. The consecutive medical records of neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies who were admitted to the Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center between April 2009 and July 2012, and who were subsequently diagnosed with VSB were reviewed retrospectively. A comparison was made between the clinical and laboratory characteristics of adults and pediatric patients and also between patients with cefepime susceptible or not susceptible VSB.. A total of 202 episodes (141 in adults, 61 in children) of VSB were identified. Among them, 26 (12.9%) cases had severe complications including four (2.0%) cases of death attributable to VSB. For antibacterial prophylaxis, most adults received ciprofloxacin (97.1%), but children more frequently received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (86.9%). Oral mucositis (p = 0.005) and abdominal pain (p = 0.001) were found more frequently in adults, and cough was found more frequently in children (p = 0.004). The occurrence rates of severe complications and death attributable to VSB were not significantly different between adults and children. Susceptibility rate to cefepime was significantly higher in adults than children (85.7% vs. 66.1%, p = 0.002). However, in multivariate analysis, cefepime susceptibility had no impact on clinical outcome.. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome between adults and children with VSB despite a difference in cefepime susceptibility. Hence, different antibiotic treatment strategies may not be necessary.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Streptococcal Infections; Viridans Streptococci

Cefepime efficacy for treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer adult patients is a controversial issue.. To describe the demographic characteristics and general mortality of patients suffering from febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime in a fourth-level Latin American hospital.. A cross-sectional observational study was performed. Study settled at San Ignacio of Bogotá, Colombia. University Hospital from January 2004 to December 2008.. A total of 333 patients were treated with cefepime, of whom 125 had suffered FN and met pre established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The general mortality was 14.4%, which was similar to the overall mortality in FN in other reports.. Although there is still no clarity regarding the efficacy of cefepime in FN, its use has not been restricted. This study did not identify an excess risk of mortality in patients treated with cefepime.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Colombia; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demography; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged