cefdinir and Skin-Diseases--Bacterial

Uncomplicated skin and skin-structure infections (uSSSIs) are common community-acquired infections which are often caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, although other pathogens are often involved. A recent treatment algorithm has recommended the use of cephalosporins as an appropriate antibiotic therapy for uSSSIs and, in particular, highlighted cefdinir as an extended-spectrum, third-generation cephalosporin with good antimicrobial activity and favourable tolerability. This case report briefly reviews the rationale for the use of cefdinir in the treatment of uSSSIs and presents two case studies to highlight the clinical use of this agent.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Skin Diseases, Bacterial

Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections commonly are caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Cefdinir, an extended spectrum, third-generation cephalosporin is a safe and effective means of treating skin infections caused by these organisms, as well as many gram-negative pathogens. This article summarizes the pharmacokinetics, dosing schedule, adverse event profile, and efficacy data for cefdinir in adult and pediatric, populations in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Child; Humans; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections

To compare the efficacy and safety of cefdinir to that of cephalexin in adolescents and adults with mild to moderate uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (USSSI).. This was an investigator-blinded, multicenter study in which patients at least 13 years of age with USSSI were randomized to receive 10 days of cefdinir 300 mg twice daily (BID) or cephalexin 250 mg four times daily (QID). Patients were evaluated at baseline, by telephone on Days 3-5, and during office visits on Days 12-14 (end-of-therapy [EOT] visit) and Days 17-24 (test-of-cure [TOC] visit).. Clinical response was evaluated at the TOC visit. Patient reported outcomes, including a usefulness questionnaire, were also assessed.. Three hundred and ninety-one patients were treated. The treatment groups were well matched with regard to demographic characteristics and types of infection. Abscess(es) (26%), wound infection (24%), and cellulitis (21%) were the most common infections. At the TOC visit, the clinical cure rate for both treatment groups was 89% (151/170 for cefdinir and 154/174 for cephalexin) in clinically evaluable patients (95% CI for difference in cure rates [-6.7 to 7.3]). In the intent-to-treat analysis, cure rates were 83% for cefdinir vs. 82% for cephalexin. Clinical cure rates for infections caused by methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus were 93% (37/40) and 92% (35/38) for cefdinir vs. 91% (29/32) and 90% (37/41) for cephalexin (p > 0.999 comparing treatment groups for MSSA; p > 0.999 for MRSA). The usefulness questionnaire demonstrated that cefdinir was more highly rated in the mean composite score (87.4 vs. 83.6, p = 0.04), with the difference primarily due to the respondents' preference for the convenience of taking the study medication (mean score 93.5 vs. 74.1 for cephalexin, p < 0.001). The study had the following limitations: the requirement for culture at baseline likely skewed the enrollment of patients towards those with abscesses; the results of culture in patients with USSSIs are often nonspecific; in some patients entering the study with a diagnosis of cellulitis, the cellulitis was associated with an abscess; and, incision and drainage (I&D), spontaneous drainage, and needle aspiration are likely to have contributed to clinical response for purulent infections, and in particular MRSA-associated infections. Both study drugs were well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (10% cefdinir, 4% cephalexin, p = 0.017), nausea (3% and 6%, respectively, p = 0.203), and vaginal mycosis (3% and 6% of females, respectively, p = 0.500).. This study demonstrated that empiric coverage of USSSIs with cephalosporin therapy remains an appropriate clinical strategy. MRSA infections responded well in both arms of the study, suggesting that the choice of a cephalosporin did not adversely affect patient outcome. However, cephalosporins do not have accepted, clinically relevant in vitro activity against MRSA. Hence, the clinical response rates seen in this study against MRSA infections must be interpreted with caution. Cefdinir was more highly rated than cephalexin in a composite usefulness assessment.

Topics: Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cefdinir; Cellulitis; Cephalexin; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Wound Infection

The spectrum and potency of cefdinir, an orally administered cephalosporin, was reevaluated for the uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection (uSSTI) indication using contemporary isolates from 2004 to 2005. Cefdinir continues to have high rates of susceptibility against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (100.0%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (groups A and B; 100.0%), viridans group streptococci (88.9%), Escherichia coli (93.2%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (90.0%). No diminished activity was detected since the last evaluation (1997-2002 isolates), and cefdinir remains significantly more potent (4- to 16-fold) than cephalexin, even when using surrogate agents of cephalexin susceptibility that were suspect for estimating true clinical utility. Activity greater than cephalexin (4-fold) was also noted for cefdinir against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Cefdinir should be considered as a viable option for the therapy uSSTI caused by indicated species.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Infective Agents; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Gram-Positive Cocci; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections

Cefdinir is a widely used orally administered cephalosporin for community-acquired respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). A total of 415 nonduplicate isolates of community-acquired SSTI (CA-SSTI) were collected from medical centers in North America and susceptibility tested against cefdinir and various compounds indicated for the treatment of CA-SSTI. The cefdinir MIC(50/90) in microg/mL/% susceptible for strains of the 7 principal CA-SSTI pathogens were: oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (0.5/0.5/100%), oxacillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.06/0.12/100%), group A streptococci (< or =0.03/< or =0.03/100%), group B streptococci (< or =0.03/0.06/100%), viridans group streptococci (0.25/2/88%), Klebsiella spp. (0.12/1/95%), and Escherichia coli (0.25/0.5/95%). Cefdinir was the most potent oral cephalosporin tested against staphylococci and the Enterobacteriaceae species, and 8-fold to 64-fold more potent than cephalexin against these pathogens. Beta-Hemolytic streptococci was highly susceptible to cefdinir (MIC(90), < or =0.03-0.06 microg/mL), while viridans group streptococci showed slightly elevated MIC results. Cephalexin MIC values for streptococcal strains (MIC(90), 1-32 microg/mL) were 32-fold to 64-fold higher than those of cefdinir or other oral cephalosporins evaluated. Only 0.5% of all 415 recent CA-SSTI pathogens were resistant to cefdinir (MIC, > or = 4 mg/L). Cefdinir showed a spectrum and potency comparable or superior to other orally administered beta-lactams (cephalexin).

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteria; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Gram-Positive Cocci; Humans; Klebsiella; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; North America; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections