cefdinir and Bronchitis

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of three antibiotic regimens in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.. In this double-blind, randomized, multicentered, parallel-group study, patients received once-daily cefdinir 600 mg, twice-daily cefdinir 300 mg, or twice-daily cefuroxime axetil 250 mg for 10 days. Primary efficacy measures were microbiologic eradication rate, by pathogen and by patient, and clinical response rate, by patient.. Of 1045 patients, 589 were evaluable for efficacy. At baseline, most patients had moderate or severe cough and sputum production as well as rhonchi, wheezing, and dyspnea. The microbiologic eradication rates by pathogen were 90% with once-daily cefdinir, 85% with twice-daily cefdinir, and 88% with twice-daily cefuroxime. The corresponding values for microbiologic eradication rate by patient were 90% (once-daily cefdinir), 85% (twice-daily cefdinir), and 86% (twice-daily cefuroxime). The respective clinical response rates by patient were 81%, 74%, and 80%. There were no significant differences in the incidence of drug-related adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Diarrhea was the most frequent complaint.. The results indicate that the efficacy and tolerability of cefdinir, once or twice daily, and cefuroxime were comparable with no significant differences between the regimens used.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Cefdinir; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were treated with cefdinir 300 mg bd for 5 days or cefprozil 500 mg bd for 10 days in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. Of the 548 patients enrolled, 281 (51%) were evaluable. The clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 80% (114/142) and 72% (100/139) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefprozil, respectively. Respiratory tract pathogens were isolated from 409 (75%) of 548 admission sputum specimens, with the predominant pathogens being Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus and Moraxella catarrhalis. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 81% (157 of 193 pathogens) and 84% (166 of 198 pathogens) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and cefprozil, respectively. Adverse event rates while on treatment were equivalent between the two treatment groups. The incidence of diarrhoea during therapy was higher for patients treated with cefdinir (17%) than for patients treated with cefprozil (6%) (P < 0.01), but most cases were mild and did not lead to discontinuation of treatment. These results indicate that a 5 day regimen of cefdinir is as effective and safe in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis as a 10 day regimen of cefprozil.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Cefdinir; Cefprozil; Cephalosporins; Child; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pharyngitis; Prospective Studies; Tonsillitis

To compare the efficacy and safety of five-day cefdinir treatment with seven-day loracarbef treatment in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, 586 patients were enrolled in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Patients received either five days of treatment with cefdinir (n = 291) at 300 mg twice daily or seven days of treatment with loracarbef (n = 295) at 400 mg twice daily. Microbiological assessments were done on sputum specimens obtained at admission and at the two post-therapy visits, if available. The clinical cure rates were 86% (138/160) and 85% (141/166) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and loracarbef, respectively. Respiratory tract pathogens were isolated from 457 (78%) of 586 admission sputum specimens, with the predominant pathogens being Haemophilus parainfluenzae, H. influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 88% (193/219 pathogens) and 90% (227/251 pathogens) for the evaluable patients treated with cefdinir and loracarbef, respectively. Adverse event rates while on treatment were 30% and 21% for cefdinir- and loracarbef-treated patients, respectively. These results indicate that a five-day regimen of cefdinir is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sputum; Treatment Outcome

A 58-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of renal dysfunction that continued to progress even after withdrawal of cefdinir, the presumed cause of acute renal failure. Renal histologic findings included interstitial fibrosis accompanied by moderate lymphocytic infiltration, and tubular atrophy with reduced numbers of epithelial cells. Mesangial cells and glomerular basement membranes were nearly normal. Scintigraphy with 67gallium disclosed diffuse abnormal accumulation in both kidneys. A lymphocyte stimulation test with cefdinir was positive. The patient was diagnosed with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by cefdinir. Serum creatinine concentrations continued to rise after withdrawal of the drug, but steroid therapy was effective in normalizing renal function.

Topics: Acute Disease; Acute Kidney Injury; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Bronchitis; C-Reactive Protein; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Creatinine; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Famotidine; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Methylprednisolone; Middle Aged; Nephritis, Interstitial; Ofloxacin; Prednisolone; Radionuclide Imaging

Cefdinir (CFDN) was evaluated for its efficacy and safety. The following results were obtained. 1. Pharmacokinetic study: CFDN was evaluated pharmacokinetically in 4 male children aged 9 to 13. CFDN was given orally to 3 children at a dose of 3 mg/kg. Peak plasma levels of 0.71 microgram/ml, 0.78 microgram/ml and 0.45 microgram/ml were attained in the 3 children, respectively, at 4 hours after dosing. Half-lives of CFDN in serum were 1.78 hours, 1.48 hours and 2.23 hours, respectively. The 12-hour urinary recovery rates of CFDN were 17.4%, 28.1% and 6.2%. When CFDN was given orally to the remaining child at a dose of 6 mg/kg, the peak plasma level was attained at 4 hours after dosing with a level of 1.16 micrograms/ml. T 1/2 was 1.78 hours. The 12-hour urinary recovery rate of CFDN was 15.0%. 2. Clinical study: CFDN 5 percent fine granules were given to 26 patients with infections; 2 with pneumonia, 4 with acute bronchitis, 1 with chronic bronchitis, 12 with pharyngitis, 4 with scarlet fever, 1 with otitis media and 2 with skin and soft tissue infections. Therapeutic responses were "excellent" in 15, "good" in 8, "fair" in 1 and "poor" in 2, with an efficacy rate of 88.5%. 3. Adverse reactions: As for adverse reactions, diarrhea was noted in 1 patient. It was concluded that CFDN is a useful drug for the treatment of the bacterial infections in pediatrics.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Age Factors; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Cefdinir; Cephalosporins; Child; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis