cefamandole and Rupture--Spontaneous

cefamandole has been researched along with Rupture--Spontaneous* in 3 studies

Trials

2 trial(s) available for cefamandole and Rupture--Spontaneous

ArticleYear
Cost analysis of antibiotics in the management of perforated or gangrenous appendicitis.
    American journal of surgery, 1986, Volume: 151, Issue:2

    Costs associated with treating patients for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were compared. Patients received single agent therapy with cefoperazone or cefamandole or combination antibiotics consisting of clindamycin and serum level-adjusted gentamicin. Forty-eight patients received cefamandole, 47 received cefoperazone, and 52 received combination clindamycin and gentamicin. Costs to the pharmacy for drugs were greater for the combination therapy; however, the higher failure rate associated with the cephalosporins created greater expenses for the single agent therapy than for combination therapy.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendicitis; Cefamandole; Cefoperazone; Clindamycin; Costs and Cost Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gangrene; Gentamicins; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rupture, Spontaneous

1986
Effect of prophylactic antibiotics in acute nonperforated appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study.
    Annals of surgery, 1981, Volume: 194, Issue:4

    A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed to determined the efficacy of short-term (24 hr) perioperative antibiotics in preventing septic complications after emergency appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis. The patients were stratified into three clinical arms: Group I (placebo, n = 45), Group II (cefamandole, n = 46) and Group III (cefamandole plus carbenicillin, n = 45). The three groups of patients were similar in regard to age, sex, duration of operation and pathologic classification of the appendix. The overall incidence of infection in the study was 5.1%. The infection rates in Groups II (2.2%) and III (0%) were significantly lower than Group I (placebo) (13.3%), (p less than 0.05). No difference was observed between cefamandole alone and cefamandole plus carbenicillin. Average postoperative hospital days per patient for each group was: Group I - 3.8 days; Group II - 2.9 days; Group III - 3.1 days. Cost analysis of hospitalization including cost of prophylactic antibiotics revealed a $247.99 per patient saving for Group II versus Group I and $95.53 for Group III versus Group I. Systemic prophylactic antibiotics can successfully reduce septic complications after appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis, and a single drug (cefamandole) directed at the facultative pathogens is as effective as double drug therapy, which includes specific anaerobic coverage.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appendicitis; Bacterial Infections; Carbenicillin; Cefamandole; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Premedication; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Rupture, Spontaneous

1981

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for cefamandole and Rupture--Spontaneous

ArticleYear
Perforated and gangrenous appendicitis: an analysis of antibiotic failures.
    The Journal of infectious diseases, 1983, Volume: 148, Issue:2

    The relationships between resistant pathogens, serum levels of gentamicin, and the outcomes of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were analyzed in 147 patients. Failure to cure the infection occurred significantly more frequently among patients treated with cefoperazone or cefamandole than among those treated with clindamycin and gentamicin in combination. The failures were associated with recovery of resistant Bacteroides fragilis from intraoperative cultures. Pseudomonas species were also associated with failures, their in vitro susceptibility not correlating with clinical cure. Patients with gentamicin peak serum levels of less than 6 micrograms/ml in the first three days were not more likely to be associated with failure than were patients with higher levels. These clinical observations indicate that antibiotic therapy of intra-abdominal sepsis should include antibiotics with in vitro activity against B fragilis and that precise adjustments of gentamicin levels may not improve outcome. In addition, Pseudomonas species may play a significant role in some of these infections.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendicitis; Bacteroides fragilis; Bacteroides Infections; Cefamandole; Cefoperazone; Cephalosporins; Clindamycin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gangrene; Gentamicins; Humans; Male; Pseudomonas; Pseudomonas Infections; Rupture, Spontaneous

1983