cefamandole has been researched along with Pelvic-Inflammatory-Disease* in 3 studies
2 trial(s) available for cefamandole and Pelvic-Inflammatory-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pelvic inflammatory disease: findings during inpatient treatment of clinically severe, laparoscopy-documented disease.
We evaluated the relationship between clinically severe pelvic inflammatory disease and laparoscopic diagnosis and grading, comparative treatment with clindamycin plus cefamandole or doxycycline, and a management protocol for inpatient pelvic inflammatory disease treatment.. Thirty-three patients who met our clinical criteria for severe pelvic inflammatory disease underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. Pelvic inflammatory disease patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with clindamycin plus cefamandole or doxycycline within our management protocol; postdischarge oral antibiotics were omitted.. Laparoscopy confirmed pelvic inflammatory disease in 23 (70%) patients; 10 (44%) had mild pelvic inflammatory disease by laparoscopic grading. Laparoscopic grade alone predicted necessary duration of therapy to response: mild pelvic inflammatory disease, 2.3 +/- 0.5 days; moderate pelvic inflammatory disease, 2.7 +/- 1.5 days; and severe pelvic inflammatory disease, 3.9 +/- 1.5 days (p less than 0.05). Using the management plan presented, response rates for both antibiotic regimens were 100%.. Clinical diagnosis and grading of severe pelvic inflammatory disease has poor specificity. Laparoscopic grading of severity of pelvic inflammatory disease seems accurate. Both clindamycin plus cefamandole and clindamycin plus doxycycline are equally effective regimens for treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease and did not require supplementation after discharge. Our management plan is objective and practical; daily bimanual examination is the most sensitive indicator of persistent disease. Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Cefamandole; Chi-Square Distribution; Clindamycin; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Doxycycline; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome | 1992 |
Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis at abdominal hysterectomy. Cefamandole vs. cefotaxime.
Two hundred twenty-three women were given a single, 1-g, intravenous dose of cefamandole or cefotaxime at elective abdominal hysterectomy in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blind clinical trial of efficacy and safety. The demographic, surgical, efficacy and safety variables were statistically similar. Prior to discharge from the hospital, 12 women (5.3%) developed major postoperative pelvic infections that required parenteral antimicrobial therapy; no wound infections occurred. There was no correlation between a depressed antimicrobial development of significant postoperative infection. An expanded spectrum of antibacterial activity and a longer serum half-life did not improve clinical efficacy, and single-dose intravenous cephalosporin prophylaxis before abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a low incidence of pelvic infection. Topics: Adult; Cefamandole; Cefotaxime; Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Middle Aged; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Wound Infection | 1988 |
1 other study(ies) available for cefamandole and Pelvic-Inflammatory-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
High-dose cefamandole therapy in obstetric and gynecologic infections.
Increased understanding of bacterial infections of the pelvis has led to the frequent administration of double and triple antimicrobial chemotherapy for polymicrobial infections in hospitalized patients. This study evaluated the use of high-dose cefamandole as a single agent in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections. Cefamandole was administered by intravenous infusion of 2 gm every 4 hours or, less often, every 3 hours. Twenty patients were entered into the study, 11 with postpartum endometritis and nine with pelvic inflammatory disease. Seventeen of the 20 patients (85%) were successfully treated; all failures were in the endometritis group. The aerobic organisms and the gram-positive anaerobic organisms isolated from these infections were susceptible in vitro to cefamandole at attainable serum concentrations. The bacteroides isolated were more resistant. The data suggest that high-dose cefamandole therapy is effective as a single agent for the majority of moderate obstetric and gynecologic infections. Topics: Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Bacteroides Infections; Cefamandole; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease | 1980 |