Page last updated: 2024-10-24

carmustine and Multiple Sclerosis

carmustine has been researched along with Multiple Sclerosis in 10 studies

Carmustine: A cell-cycle phase nonspecific alkylating antineoplastic agent. It is used in the treatment of brain tumors and various other malignant neoplasms. (From Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p462) This substance may reasonably be anticipated to be a carcinogen according to the Fourth Annual Report on Carcinogens (NTP 85-002, 1985). (From Merck Index, 11th ed)
carmustine : A member of the class of N-nitrosoureas that is 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)urea in which one of the nitrogens is substituted by a nitroso group.

Multiple Sclerosis: An autoimmune disorder mainly affecting young adults and characterized by destruction of myelin in the central nervous system. Pathologic findings include multiple sharply demarcated areas of demyelination throughout the white matter of the central nervous system. Clinical manifestations include visual loss, extra-ocular movement disorders, paresthesias, loss of sensation, weakness, dysarthria, spasticity, ataxia, and bladder dysfunction. The usual pattern is one of recurrent attacks followed by partial recovery (see MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, RELAPSING-REMITTING), but acute fulminating and chronic progressive forms (see MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, CHRONIC PROGRESSIVE) also occur. (Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p903)

Research

Studies (10)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19902 (20.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's5 (50.00)29.6817
2010's2 (20.00)24.3611
2020's1 (10.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
von Niederhäusern, V1
Ruder, J1
Ghraichy, M1
Jelcic, I1
Müller, AM1
Schanz, U1
Martin, R2
Trück, J1
Schippling, S1
Hamerschlak, N1
Rodrigues, M1
Moraes, DA1
Oliveira, MC1
Stracieri, AB1
Pieroni, F1
Barros, GM1
Madeira, MI1
Simões, BP1
Barreira, AA1
Brum, DG1
Ribeiro, AA1
Kutner, JM1
Tylberi, CP1
Porto, PP1
Santana, CL1
Neto, JZ1
Barros, JC1
Paes, AT1
Burt, RK1
Oliveira, EA1
Mastropietro, AP1
Santos, AC1
Voltarelli, JC1
Krasulová, E1
Trneny, M1
Kozák, T3
Vacková, B1
Pohlreich, D1
Kemlink, D1
Kobylka, P3
Kovárová, I1
Lhotáková, P1
Havrdová, E3
Saccardi, R1
Mancardi, GL1
Solari, A1
Bosi, A1
Bruzzi, P1
Di Bartolomeo, P1
Donelli, A1
Filippi, M1
Guerrasio, A1
Gualandi, F1
La Nasa, G1
Murialdo, A1
Pagliai, F1
Papineschi, F1
Scappini, B1
Marmont, AM1
Su, L1
Xu, J1
Ji, BX1
Wan, SG1
Lu, CY1
Dong, HQ1
Yu, YY1
Lu, DP1
Jedlicka, P1
Hanzal, F1
Pit'ha, J2
Gregora, E2
Pytlík, R2
Maaloufová, J2
Marecková, H1
Vodvárková, S2
Gola, A1
Niewolna, M1
Weryńska, B1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis in Sweden - a Register-based Retrospective Observational Study[NCT05029206]174 participants (Actual)Observational2021-05-05Completed
A Phase II Study of High-Dose Immunosuppressive Therapy Using Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan, Thymoglobulin and Autologous CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Poor Prognosis Multiple Sclerosis[NCT00288626]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Event-Free Survival Probability During the 3 Years After Transplant

Event-free survival (EFS) is survival without death or disease activity from any one of the following criteria: 1) loss of neurological function, defined as a change in pretransplant Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of > 0.5. 2) Relapse, defined as the development of a new neurological sign and corresponding symptom, or worsening of an existing neurological sign and symptom, localized to central nervous system white matter, resulting in neurological deficit/disability, and lasting over 48 hours. 3) New lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), defined as presence of 2 or more independent multiple sclerosis brain lesions detected on MRI 1 year or more after stem cell transplant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence interval based on Greenwood's formula for standard error. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
HDIT and HCT0.784

Event-Free Survival Probability During the 5 Years After Transplant

Event-free survival (EFS) is survival without death or disease activity from any one of the following criteria: 1) loss of neurological function, defined as a change in pretransplant Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of > 0.5. 2) Relapse, defined as the development of a new neurological sign and corresponding symptom, or worsening of an existing neurological sign and symptom, localized to central nervous system white matter, resulting in neurological deficit/disability, and lasting over 48 hours. 3) New lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), defined as presence of 2 or more independent multiple sclerosis brain lesions detected on MRI 1 year or more after stem cell transplant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence interval based on Greenwood's formula for standard error. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
HDIT and HCT0.692

Percent of Participants Who Experienced All-Cause Morbidity

Morbidity is the occurrence of NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 adverse event grade 3 or higher. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From the time of enrollment until completion of the 5-year follow-up, an average of 6 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HDIT and HCT100

Percent of Participants Who Experienced All-Cause Morbidity Within 12 Months of Post-HCT

Morbidity is the occurrence of NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 adverse event grade 3 or higher. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From the time of Autologous CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) to 1 year after HCT.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HDIT and HCT95.8

Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment, or neutrophil count recovery, is defined as an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) > 500/ μL for 2 consecutive measurements on different days. Normal range is 1500 to 8000/μL. Reference: http://www.medicinenet.com (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From time of graft infusion to time of engraftment, up to 6 years

InterventionDays (Mean)
HDIT and HCT10.8

Time to Platelet Engraftment

Platelet engraftment, or platelet count recovery, is defined as Platelets > 20,000/μL for two consecutive measurements on different days with no platelet transfusions in the preceding 7 days. Normal range is 150,000-450,000/μL. Reference: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/heart_vascular_institute/clinical_services/centers_excellence/womens_cardiovascular_health_center/patient_information/health_topics/platelets.html. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From time of graft infusion to time of engraftment, up to 6 years

InterventionDays (Mean)
HDIT and HCT18.5

Change From Baseline in Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses disability in Multiple Sclerosis patients. Eight functional systems are evaluated: visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel and bladder, cerebral, and ambulation. The overall score ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to MS). Change from baseline was computed as the value at the time point minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening. A change of > 0.5 in EDSS was a treatment-failure criterion. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 6 months to 5 years after HCT

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT-0.3-0.7-0.8-0.8-0.6-0.9

Change From Baseline in Number of Gadolinium-Enhanced Lesions

Multiple sclerosis disease-related lesions were assessed by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Change from baseline was computed as the value at the time point minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 5 years after HCT

InterventionLesions per scan (Mean)
8 Weeks Post Transplant6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT-2.1-2.3-2.5-2.5-1.3-2.2-2.7

Change From Baseline in T1-Weighted Lesion Volume

A T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was used to assess the volume of T1 lesions in the brain. Change from baseline was computed as the value at the time point minus the baseline value. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 5 years after HCT

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
8 Weeks Post Transplant6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT-0.10.00.20.30.40.40.3

Change From Baseline in T2-Weighted Lesion Volume

A T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was used to assess the volume of T2 lesions in the brain. Change from baseline was computed as the value at the time point minus the baseline value. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 5 years after HCT

Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
8 Weeks Post Transplant6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT-0.8-0.7-1.0-1.6-1.9-1.9-2.3

Disease-Modifying Therapy Survival Probability After Transplant

Treatment with disease-modifying therapy was measured by the number of days from transplant to the first treatment with an additional disease-modifying therapy. Examples of therapy include interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, other immunosuppressive medications, or experimental therapies directed against MS activity. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence interval based on Greenwood's formula for standard error. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 1 to 5 years after HCT

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT1.01.01.01.00.950

Event-Free Survival Probability After Transplant

Event-free survival (EFS) is survival without death or disease activity from any one of the following criteria: 1) loss of neurological function, defined as a change in pretransplant Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of > 0.5. 2) Relapse, defined as the development of a new neurological sign and corresponding symptom, or worsening of an existing neurological sign and symptom, localized to central nervous system white matter, resulting in neurological deficit/disability, and lasting over 48 hours. 3) New lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), defined as presence of 2 or more independent multiple sclerosis brain lesions detected on MRI 1 year or more after stem cell transplant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence intervals based on Greenwood's formula for standard error. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 1, 2, and 4 years after HCT

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT0.9580.8280.738

MRI Activity-Free Survival Probability After Transplant

MS disease activity is measured as days from transplant to first occurrence of >= 2 new MS lesions on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relative to baseline. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence intervals based on Greenwood's formula for standard error. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 1 to 5 years after HCT

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT0.9580.9580.9580.9100.863

MS Progression-Free Survival Probability After Transplant

"MS progression is measured as number of days from transplant to first Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase of more than 0.5 relative to the baseline measurement. EDSS assesses disability in Multiple Sclerosis patients. Eight functional systems are evaluated: visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel and bladder, cerebral, and ambulation. The overall score ranges from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to MS).~Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence intervals based on Greenwood's formula for standard error." (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 1 to 5 years after HCT

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT1.00.9130.9130.9130.913

MS Relapse-Free Survival Probability After Transplant

"MS clinical relapse is defined as the development of a new neurological sign and corresponding symptom, or worsening of an existing neurological sign and symptom, localized to central nervous system white matter, resulting in neurological deficit or disability, and lasting over 48 hours. Clinical relapse was determined by the participant's neurologist and was measured as days from transplant to new or worsening neurological symptom relative to baseline.~Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability, with 90% confidence interval based on Greenwood's formula for standard error." (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 1 to 5 years after HCT

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT0.9580.9150.8690.8690.869

Number of New T2-Weighted Lesions From Baseline

A T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was used to determine the number of new T2 lesions in the brain relative to Baseline. A value of 0 means that the participant didn't worsen. Values greater than 0 indicate an increase in disease activity from baseline. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 6 Months to 5 years after HCT

InterventionLesions per scan (Mean)
6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT0.20.20.20.10.40.1

Overall Survival

The probability that a participant did not experienced a death estimated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following transplant via the Kaplan-Meier Method. Greenwood's formula for standard error was used to calculate 90% confidence intervals. Participants that did not die were censored at the time of last follow-up. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From study entry to death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study, whichever came first, up to 6 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT1.01.00.9570.9110.863

Percent Change From Screening in Brain Volume

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan techniques measured ventricular volumes and grey and white matter brain volumes. Change from screening was computed as the value at the time point minus the screening value. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 5 years after HCT

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
8 Weeks Post Transplant6 Months Post Transplant1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT-0.8-1.1-1.2-1.6-2.2-2.0-2.3

Survival From MS-Related Mortality

The probability that a participant did not experienced a MS-related death estimated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following transplant via the Kaplan-Meier Method. Greenwood's formula for standard error was used to calculate 90% confidence intervals. Participants that did not experience a MS-related death were censored at the time of last follow-up. A MS-related death was defined as death that occurred at any time after study entry and that was possibly, probably, or definitely related to disease progression. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From study entry to death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study, whichever came first, up to 6 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT1.01.00.9570.9570.906

Survival From Treatment-Related Mortality

The probability that a participant did not experienced a treatment-related death estimated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following transplant via the Kaplan-Meier Method. Greenwood's formula for standard error was used to calculate 90% confidence intervals. Participants that did not experience a treatment-related death were censored at the time of last follow-up. A treatment-related death was defined as death that occurred at any time after study entry and that was possibly, probably, or definitely related to the cellular product or possibly, probably, or definitely related to mobilization of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells with G-CSF and prednisone or to the high-dose immunosuppressive therapy. There were no treatment-related mortality events in the study. (NCT00288626)
Timeframe: From study entry to death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study, whichever came first, up to 6 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
1 Year Post Transplant2 Years Post Transplant3 Years Post Transplant4 Years Post Transplant5 Years Post Transplant
HDIT and HCT1.01.01.01.01.0

Reviews

1 review available for carmustine and Multiple Sclerosis

ArticleYear
[Stem cell therapy in multiple sclerosis: a clinical update].
    Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2009, Volume: 68, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antilymphocyte Serum; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Marrow Purging;

2009

Trials

4 trials available for carmustine and Multiple Sclerosis

ArticleYear
Brazilian experience with two conditioning regimens in patients with multiple sclerosis: BEAM/horse ATG and CY/rabbit ATG.
    Bone marrow transplantation, 2010, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Animals; Antilymphocyte Serum; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cy

2010
High-dose immunosuppressive therapy with PBPC support in the treatment of poor risk multiple sclerosis.
    Bone marrow transplantation, 2000, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; CD4-CD8

2000
Immunoablative therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of poor risk multiple sclerosis.
    Transplantation proceedings, 2001, Volume: 33, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Carmustine; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Cytarabine;

2001
[Results of the combined treatment of advanced multiple myeloma by the M-2 protocol: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, melphalan, nitrosourea and prednisone].
    Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej, 1987, Volume: 77, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopho

1987

Other Studies

5 other studies available for carmustine and Multiple Sclerosis

ArticleYear
B-Cell Reconstitution After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis.
    Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2022, Volume: 9, Issue:6

    Topics: Antilymphocyte Serum; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Etoposide; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Hu

2022
High-dose immunoablation with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aggressive multiple sclerosis: a single centre 10-year experience.
    Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2010, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Combined Modality Th

2010
Autologous HSCT for severe progressive multiple sclerosis in a multicenter trial: impact on disease activity and quality of life.
    Blood, 2005, Mar-15, Volume: 105, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Antilymphocyte Serum; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine;

2005
Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe multiple sclerosis.
    International journal of hematology, 2006, Volume: 84, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Antigens, CD34; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carmustine; Cytarabine; Diarr

2006
[Treatment of multiple sclerosis with a cerebrospinal derivative of nitrosurea, trade name Nitrumon (Simes, Milano)].
    Ceskoslovenska neurologie a neurochirurgie, 1980, Volume: 43, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Carmustine; Humans; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis

1980