cariprazine and Acute-Disease

Early treatment of psychotic illness improves outcomes, reduces relapse rates and should not be delayed. Cariprazine is a promising antipsychotic drug and may be a valuable resource when clinicians are in doubt if psychotic symptoms are due to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included seven studies (n = 2896) analyzing the effect of cariprazine in psychotic symptoms assessed by the positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS).. We found cariprazine to be significantly superior to placebo (Hedges' g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.32-0.49) for acute psychosis independently of primary psychiatric diagnosis and also to be superior to placebo for both schizophrenia (Hedges' g = 0.39; 95% CI 0.29-0.50) and bipolar patients (Hedges' g = 0.43; 95% CI 0.27-0.58).. We propose that cariprazine may be useful in treating psychosis independently of nosological differentiation at the beginning of the treatment Key pointsEarly treatment of psychotic illness with antipsychotic medications improves outcomes and reduces relapse rates.Cariprazine was found to be significantly superior to placebo for acute psychosis independently of primary psychiatric diagnosis.Cariprazine may be useful in treating psychosis independently of nosological differentiation between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder at the beginning of the treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Piperazines; Psychotic Disorders; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians. The authors sought to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.. A search of multiple electronic databases (through November 2018) was conducted for all placebo-controlled dose-finding studies for 20 second-generation antipsychotic drugs and haloperidol (oral and long-acting injectable, LAI) in people with acute schizophrenia symptoms. Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model. The outcome measure was total score reduction from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The authors identified 95% effective doses, explored whether higher or lower doses than the currently licensed ones might be more appropriate, and derived dose equivalencies from the 95% effective doses.. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The 95% effective doses and the doses equivalent to 1 mg of oral risperidone, respectively, were as follows: amisulpride for patients with positive symptoms, 537 mg/day and 85.8 mg; aripiprazole, 11.5 mg/day and 1.8 mg; aripiprazole LAI (lauroxil), 463 mg every 4 weeks and 264 mg; asenapine, 15.0 mg/day and 2.4 mg; brexpiprazole, 3.36 mg/day and 0.54 mg; haloperidol, 6.3 mg/day and 1.01 mg; iloperidone, 20.13 mg/day and 3.2 mg; lurasidone, 147 mg/day and 23.5 mg; olanzapine, 15.2 mg/day and 2.4 mg; olanzapine LAI, 277 mg every 2 weeks and 3.2 mg; paliperidone, 13.4 mg/day and 2.1 mg; paliperidone LAI, 120 mg every 4 weeks and 1.53 mg; quetiapine, 482 mg/day and 77 mg; risperidone, 6.3 mg/day and 1 mg; risperidone LAI, 36.6 mg every 2 weeks and 0.42 mg; sertindole, 22.5 mg/day and 3.6 mg; and ziprasidone, 186 mg/day and 30 mg. For amisulpride and olanzapine, specific data for patients with predominant negative symptoms were available. The authors have made available on their web site a spreadsheet with this method and other updated methods that can be used to estimate dose equivalencies in practice.. In chronic schizophrenia patients with acute exacerbations, doses higher than the identified 95% effective doses may on average not provide more efficacy. For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Clozapine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haloperidol; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Isoxazoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Piperazines; Piperidines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of cariprazine treatment in acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.. This review included randomized controlled trials of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia in relation to efficacy and acceptability. The efficacy outcomes were assessed by pooling standardized mean differences (SMDs) calculated from the difference in the reduction in the mean of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, PANSS positive and negative scores, and response rate. The primary acceptability outcomes were determined by pooling the risk ratios (RRs) of discontinuation for any reason, the incidence of serious adverse events, and treatment emergent events.. Four randomized controlled trials consisting of 1843 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Efficacy analysis showed significant positive effects in relation to cariprazine therapy (SMD: -0.37, P < 0.00001 for PANSS total score change; SMD: -0.32, P < 0.00001 for PANSS positive score change; SMD: -0.32, P < 0.0001 for PANSS negative score change; RR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.67; P < 0.0001 for response rate). For primary acceptability outcomes, less patients taking cariprazine discontinued treatment for any reason compared with patients receiving placebo (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.04; P = 0.16). Significantly less patients on cariprazine had serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment period compared with patients taking placebo (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89; P = 0.01). Significantly more patients on cariprazine had treatment emergent events compared with those receiving placebo (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P = 0.006).. Results suggest that cariprazine may be an effective and acceptable treatment for schizophrenia and future research is warranted.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Cariprazine, a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic with preferential binding to D3 receptors, is Food and Drug Administration approved for treating schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. A post-hoc safety/tolerability analysis of data from the four acute trials in the cariprazine schizophrenia clinical development program (NCT00404573; NCT00694707; NCT01104766; NCT01104779) was carried out using the overall safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug) and modal daily dose subgroups (1.5-3, 4.5-6, and 9-12 mg/day). These exploratory findings were summarized using descriptive statistics. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events versus placebo was similar for cariprazine 1.5-3 mg/day and higher for cariprazine 4.5-6 and 9-12 mg/day; a dose-response relationship was observed for akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms, and diastolic blood pressure. The mean changes in metabolic parameters were generally similar in cariprazine-treated and placebo-treated patients. There was no prolactin level increase or QTc value greater than 500 ms; small increases in mean body weight (∼1to2 kg) versus placebo were observed. Within the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose range (1.5-6 mg/day), cariprazine was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Double-Blind Method; Headache; Humans; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Cariprazine is a new dopamine D2 and D3 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic. Meta-analytic evidence of efficacy in acute schizophrenia and specific groups of patients is lacking. We carried out a meta-analysis in patients with acute schizophrenia to evaluate the efficacy of cariprazine over placebo and active comparators in overall symptoms, positive and negative symptoms and quality of life. Low and high (≥6 mg/day) doses were tested separately. The possible effect of clinical-demographic modulators was also tested. Four studies (2144 patients) were included. Both high and low cariprazine doses proved superior to placebo in all symptom domains. The standardized mean difference (SMD) to placebo showed a modest impact on overall symptoms compared with meta-analytic results for other antipsychotics (SMD was similar to lurasidone, asenapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole, but lower than risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine). The SMD to placebo on negative symptoms was superior to many antipsychotics including aripiprazole, with a slightly more relevant effect of cariprazine low doses. This effect was probably on secondary negative symptoms since the short-term follow-up of the studies included. Meta-regression data further refined the compound clinical profile, suggesting that cariprazine may be particularly useful in young patients with a relatively short duration of disease.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

Cariprazine (RGH-188, trans-4-{2-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-piperazine-1-yl]-ethyl}-N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl-cyclohexyl-amine hydrochloride), is a novel antipsychotic with dopamine D2 and D3 receptors antagonist-partial agonist properties. Cariprazine has also moderate affinity for serotonin 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) 1A receptors, high affinity for 5-HT1B receptors with pure antagonism and low affinity for 5-HT2A receptors. Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose (3-12 mg/day) studies have demonstrated cariprazine is effective in both schizophrenia and acute manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder. The incidence of serious adverse events in cariprazine arm was no different than in placebo arm in these studies. The most common adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms, headache, akathisia, constipation, nausea, and dyspepsia which can be explained with cariprazine's partial dopamine agonism. Although cariprazine treatment was associated with a higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, particularly akathisia and tremor, common side effects of marketed second generation antipsychotics such as weight gain, metabolic disturbances, prolactin increase or QTc prolongation were not associated with cariprazine, probably due to its moderate to low binding affinity for histamine H1 and 5-HT2C receptors. Animal studies show that cariprazine may have additional therapeutic benefit on impaired cognitive functioning with D3 receptor activity, however clinical data is still scarce. The aim of this article is to review the potential use of cariprazine for the treatment of acute manic episodes in the light of the preclinical and clinical trials reported to date.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Piperazines

Although currently approved antipsychotics exert efficacy on positive symptoms of schizophrenia, treatments for negative symptoms remain a major unmet need. Post hoc analyses were used to investigate the possible efficacy of cariprazine in patients with moderate/severe negative symptoms of schizophrenia and no predominance of positive symptoms. Data were pooled from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled cariprazine studies in patients with acute schizophrenia (NCT00694707, NCT01104766). Analyses included data from a subset of patients with a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factor score for negative symptoms (PANSS-FSNS) ≥24, PANSS factor score for positive symptoms (PANSS-FSPS) ≤19, and scores of ≥4 on ≥2 of 3 PANSS items (blunted affect [N1], passive/apathetic social withdrawal [N4], lack of spontaneity/flow of conversation [N6]). Changes from baseline to week 6 in PANSS-FSNS were evaluated in the following treatment groups: placebo (n = 79), cariprazine 1.5-3 (n = 94) and 4.5-6 mg/d (n = 66), risperidone 4 mg/d (n = 34), or aripiprazole 10 mg/d (n = 44). Significant differences were observed versus placebo for cariprazine (1.5-3 mg/d, P = .0179; 4.5-6 mg/d, P = .0002) and risperidone (P = .0149), but not aripiprazole (P = .3265), and versus aripiprazole for cariprazine 4.5-6 mg/d (P = .0197). After adjusting for positive symptom changes, differences versus placebo remained statistically significant for cariprazine (1.5-3 mg/d, P = .0322; 4.5-6 mg/d, P = .0038) but not for risperidone (P = .2204). PANSS-FSNS response (≥20% reduction from baseline) rates were significantly higher with cariprazine (1.5-3 mg/d = 54.3%, P = .0194; 4.5-6 mg/d = 69.7%, P = .0001) than placebo (35.4%). In patients with acute schizophrenia and moderate/severe negative symptoms, cariprazine was associated with significantly greater improvement in negative symptoms compared with placebo and aripiprazole, warranting further exploration of the efficacy of cariprazine on negative symptoms.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piperazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Young Adult

This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of flexibly-dosed cariprazine in patients with acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.. Patients were randomized to 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with cariprazine 3-12mg/day (n=158) or placebo (n=154). The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to Week 3 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score. The secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to Week 3 in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score.. Mean change from baseline to Week 3 in YMRS total score was significantly greater for patients receiving cariprazine 3-12mg/day versus placebo (P=0.0004). Significant differences between groups in YMRS total score mean change were observed by Day 4 (first postbaseline assessment) and maintained throughout double-blind treatment (all assessments, P<0.01). Cariprazine also demonstrated statistically significant superiority over placebo on YMRS response (≥50% improvement: cariprazine, 58.9%; placebo, 44.1%; P=0.0097) and remission (YMRS total score≤12: cariprazine, 51.9%; placebo, 34.9%; P=0.0025) and mean change in CGI-S (P=0.0027) score and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (P=0.0035) total score. The most common cariprazine-related (≥10% and twice placebo) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, tremor, dyspepsia, and vomiting. Mean change from baseline in metabolic parameters were generally small and similar between groups.. Lack of active comparator arm; short duration of study.. In this study, cariprazine 3-12mg/day was effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyspepsia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Tremor; Vomiting

This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cariprazine, a dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist with preferential binding to D3 receptors, in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to 6-week double-blind treatment with placebo, cariprazine 3 to 6 mg/d, or cariprazine 6 to 9 mg/d. Primary and secondary efficacy: change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores, respectively, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures adjusting for multiple comparisons. Safety included treatment-emergent adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, electrocardiograms, ophthalmologic examination, Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and extrapyramidal symptom scales. In the Safety Population (placebo, n = 147; cariprazine 3-6 mg/d, n = 151; cariprazine 6-9 mg/d, n = 148), 60.5% of patients completed the study. At week 6, statistically significant least squares mean differences in favor of cariprazine versus placebo were observed for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (3-6 mg/d: -6.8, P = 0.003; 6-9 mg/d: -9.9, P < 0.001) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (3-6 mg/d: -0.3, P = 0.012; 6-9 mg/d: -0.5, P < 0.001). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5% and twice the rate of placebo) in both cariprazine groups were akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, and tremor; most were mild to moderate in severity. Mean changes in metabolic parameters were generally small and similar between groups. Prolactin levels decreased in all groups. In conclusion, cariprazine 3 to 6 and 6 to 9 mg/d versus placebo demonstrated significant improvement on primary and secondary efficacy parameters. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. These results suggest that cariprazine may be a new and effective treatment for schizophrenia.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome

This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study was conducted from April 2010 to December 2011. Patients who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia were randomized to placebo (n = 153), cariprazine 3 mg/d (n = 155), cariprazine 6 mg/d (n = 157), or aripiprazole 10 mg/d (n = 152) for 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. The primary and secondary efficacy parameters were mean change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score, respectively.. Least squares mean differences (LSMDs) in PANSS total score change at week 6 significantly favored cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d versus placebo (LSMD [95% CI]: 3 mg/d, -6.0 [-10.1 to -1.9], adjusted P = .0044; 6 mg/d, -8.8 [-12.9 to -4.7], adjusted P < .0001). Cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d were also associated with significant improvements relative to placebo in CGI-S scores (LSMD [95% CI]: 3 mg/d, -0.4 [-0.6 to -0.2], adjusted P = .0044; 6 mg/d, -0.5 [-0.7 to -0.3], adjusted P < .0001). Significant differences from placebo were also observed with aripiprazole on the PANSS (LSMD [95% CI]: -7.0 [-11.0 to -2.9], P = .0008) and CGI-S (LSMD [95% CI]: -0.4 [-0.6 to -0.2], P = .0001). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 10%) were insomnia (all groups), akathisia (cariprazine 6 mg/d), and headache (placebo, cariprazine 6 mg/d).. This study supports the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01104766.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piperazines; Schizophrenia