cardiovascular-agents and Angina--Stable

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Computed Tomography Angiography; Disease Management; Echocardiography; Humans; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Referral and Consultation

Beta-blockers are recommended by the European Society of Cardiology as first-line antianginal therapy for reducing heart rate (HR) and symptoms in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, despite a lack of data showing superiority to other antianginal agents. Most patients with angina pectoris require combination therapy to manage symptoms, with a second-line agent chosen to manage the predominant cardiovascular problem. Ivabradine, a selective sinus node I. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with stable angina pectoris who remained symptomatic despite receiving beta-blockers. Keyword searches of PubMed, The Cochrane Central Library Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Google Scholar identified studies comparing ivabradine plus beta-blockers with placebo or other first- or second-line antianginal agents in patients with stable angina pectoris. No date limits or language restrictions were applied. Outcomes were evaluated after 1 and 4 months of treatment, including changes in HR, angina attacks, use of short-acting nitrates, quality of life and safety. Risk of bias was evaluated on the basis of recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.. Seven relevant studies were identified (N = 6821). Ivabradine plus a beta-blocker consistently reduced HR, anginal symptoms and short-acting nitrate consumption within 1 month of initiating therapy, with continued reductions for up to 4 months. Furthermore, ivabradine plus beta-blocker therapy was well tolerated, with bradycardia rarely reported (0.1% of patients overall). This study is limited by the inclusion of only two randomised studies, which may lead to result interpretation bias.. Ivabradine may be valuable for tailoring early antianginal treatment when used in combination with beta-blockers for chronic stable angina inadequately controlled by beta-blockers.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Nitrates; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and stable angina are a growing clinical burden worldwide. This is of particular concern in the Gulf region given its high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, especially diabetes mellitus and smoking. Despite recommendations on the use of first- and second-line anti-anginal medication, management challenges remain. Current guidelines for pharmacologic treatment are not determined by the range of pathophysiological mechanisms of ischaemia and consequent angina, which may occur either in isolation or co-exist. In this article, we highlight the need to improve knowledge of the epidemiology of chronic coronary syndromes in the Middle East and Gulf region, and the need for studies of stratified pharmacologic approaches to improve symptomatic angina and quality of life in the large and growing number of patients with coronary artery disease from this region. We discuss the role of nicorandil, currently recommended as a second-line anti-anginal drug in CCS patients, and suggest that this may be a particularly useful add-on therapy for patients in the Gulf region.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Nicorandil; Quality of Life; Syndrome; Vasodilator Agents

Nearly 10 million US adults experience stable angina, which occurs when myocardial oxygen supply does not meet demand, resulting in myocardial ischemia. Stable angina is associated with an average annual risk of 3% to 4% for myocardial infarction or death. Diagnostic tests and medical therapies for stable angina have evolved over the last decade with a better understanding of the optimal use of coronary revascularization.. Coronary computed tomographic angiography is a first-line diagnostic test in the evaluation of patients with stable angina due to higher sensitivity and comparable specificity compared with imaging-based stress testing. Moreover, coronary computed tomographic angiography allows detection of nonobstructive atherosclerosis that would not be identified with other noninvasive imaging modalities, improving risk assessment and potentially triggering more appropriate allocation of preventive therapies. Novel therapies treating lipids (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, and icosapent ethyl) and type 2 diabetes (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists) have improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease when added to usual care. Randomized clinical trials showed no improvement in the rates of mortality or myocardial infarction with revascularization (largely by percutaneous coronary intervention) compared with optimal medical therapy alone, even in the setting of moderate to severe ischemia. In contrast, revascularization provides a meaningful benefit on angina and quality of life compared with antianginal therapies. Measures of the effect of angina on a patient's quality of life should be integrated into the clinic encounter to assist with the decision to proceed with revascularization.. For patients with stable angina, emphasis should be placed on optimizing lifestyle factors and preventive medications such as lipid-lowering and antiplatelet agents to reduce the risk for cardiovascular events and death. Antianginal medications, such as β-blockers, nitrates, or calcium channel blockers, should be initiated to improve angina symptoms. Revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention should be reserved for patients in whom angina symptoms negatively influence quality of life, generally after a trial of antianginal medical therapy. Shared decision-making with an informed patient is important for effective treatment of stable angina.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Computed Tomography Angiography; Electrocardiography; Healthy Lifestyle; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Quality of Life

Medical therapies are used to improve stable anginal symptoms and quality of life in clinical practice however the evidence for the use of antianginal medication in women is largely unknown. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the extent of the evidence-base for the medical management of anginal symptoms in women with stable angina.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to the end of December 2019. Retrieved papers were hand searched. Included were randomised controlled trials with at least one week of follow-up that included women with stable angina pectoris, with or without significant coronary atherosclerosis, randomised to conventional antianginal medication or/and a comparator, with a primary or secondary endpoint of angina frequency or glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) consumption.. A total of 397 eligible publications were included in a qualitative analysis, with women comprising up to 20-30% of the study populations. No publication that included women and men reported all data separately for each sex. Twenty-six publications reported any female data separately from male data but only 18 reported angina data for women, 12 of which included fewer than 10 women.. Substantially fewer women than men were included in randomised trials of antianginal medications reporting effects on anginal symptoms, and reporting of data by sex was infrequent. As a result, there is little evidence on which to base treatment recommendations for anginal symptoms in women. Our results provide a platform for future studies to fill this void in the evidence.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Coronary heart disease is a chronic, systemic disease with a wide range of associated symptoms, clinical outcomes, and health care expenditure. Adverse events from coronary heart disease can be mitigated or avoided with lifestyle and risk factor modifications, and medical therapy. These measures are effective in slowing the progression of atherosclerotic disease and in reducing the risk of thrombosis in the setting of plaque disruptions. With increasing effectiveness of prevention and medical therapy, the role of coronary artery revascularization has decreased and is largely confined to subgroups of patients with unacceptable angina, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or high-risk coronary anatomy. There is a compelling need to allocate resources appropriately to improve prevention. Herein, we review the scientific evidence in support of medical therapy and revascularization for the management of patients with stable coronary heart disease and discuss implications for the evaluation of patients with stable angina and public policy.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Disease Management; Healthy Lifestyle; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Review Literature as Topic; Risk Factors; Risk Reduction Behavior; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Stable angina affects a significant number of coronary artery disease patients, impairing their quality of life and worsening their prognosis. It manifests even despite a history of revascularization and is often poorly controlled with drug therapy. Comorbid conditions are frequently encountered in coronary artery disease patients, affecting their prognosis and rendering the diagnosis and management of angina more challenging. In this article, derived by an expert panel meeting, we attempt a practical approach to stable angina, focusing on symptomatic patients subjected to previous coronary revascularization or not suitable for revascularization and providing handy diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms and comorbidity-adjusted therapeutic approaches in accordance with existing evidence, current recommendations, and locally available therapeutic options.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiology; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Decision-Making; Consensus; Decision Support Techniques; Heart Function Tests; Humans; Patient Selection; Predictive Value of Tests

Ischaemic heart disease is a major cause of death and disability worldwide, while angina represents its most common symptom. It is estimated that approximately 9 million patients in the USA suffer from angina and its treatment is challenging, thus the strategy to improve the management of chronic stable angina is a priority. Angina might be the result of different pathologies, ranging from the "classical" obstruction of a large coronary artery to alteration of the microcirculation or coronary artery spasm. Current clinical guidelines recommend antianginal therapy to control symptoms, before considering coronary artery revascularization. In the current guidelines, drugs are classified as being first-choice (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and short-acting nitrates) or second-choice (ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine, trimetazidine) treatment, with the recommendation to reserve second-line modifications for patients who have contraindications to first-choice agents, do not tolerate them, or remain symptomatic. However, such a categorical approach is currently questioned. In addition, current guidelines provide few suggestions to guide the choice of drugs more suitable according to the underlying pathology or the patient comorbidities. Several other questions have recently emerged, such as: is there evidence-based data between first- and second-line treatments in terms of prognosis or symptom relief? Actually, it seems that newer antianginal drugs, which are classified as second choice, have more evidence-based clinical data that are more contemporary to support their use than what is available for the first-choice drugs. It follows that actual guidelines are based more on tradition than on evidence and there is a need for new algorithms that are more individualized to patients, their comorbidities, and pathophysiological mechanism of chronic stable angina.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angina, Stable; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Chest Pain; Humans; Ivabradine; Nicorandil; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome; Trimetazidine

Although there are established drugs for treatment of cardiovascular diseases, due to adverse effects these drugs may not be clinically applicable to all patients. Recent trends have seen the emergence of drugs which act on funny current channels to induce selective heart rate reduction. Ivabradine is one such drug developed for coronary artery disease and heart failure. There is inconsistent evidence about the effect of this selective inhibitor in reduction of cardiovascular related mortality and morbidity. Such an inconsistency warrants the need for a meta-analysis to consider the effectiveness and efficacy of Ivabradine in the treatment of coronary artery disease and heart failure.. Randomized controlled trials with a minimum follow-up period of one year were searched in Pub Med/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published between 1980 and 2016.Each eligible study was assessed for risk of bias by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool. The outcomes assessed in this study included: all cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality, hospitalization for new or worsening heart failure, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis and publication bias were assessed. We used Mantel-Haenszel method for random-effects. Analysis was done using RevMan5.1™.This study was registered in PROSPERO as [PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016035597].. Three trials with a total of 36,577 participants met the meta-analysis criteria. Pooled analysis showed that ivabradine is not effective in reducing cardiovascular deaths (OR: 1.02; CI:0.91-1.15,P = 0.74), all-cause mortality (OR:1.00; CI:0.91-1.10,P = 0.98), coronary revascularization (OR: 0.93, CI: 0.77-1.11, P = 0.41) and hospital admission for worsening of heart failure (OR: 0.94, CI: 0.71-1.25, P = 0.69). However, the drug was found to significantly increase adverse events: phosphenes (OR:7.77, CI: 4.4-14.6,P < 0.00001), blurred vision (OR:3.07,CI:2.18-4.32,P < 0.00001), symptomatic bradycardia (OR: 6.23, CI: 4.2-9.26, P < 0.00001), and atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.35, CI: 1.19-1.53, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis by duration of follow up on cardiovascular outcomes found that there is no difference in effect of ivabradine depending on the duration of follow up. There was no publication bias in reporting of included studies.. This meta-analysis suggests that ivabradine is not effective in reducing cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality unless used for specific conditions. On the contrary, the use of this drug was strongly associated with the onset of untoward and new adverse events. This finding strongly supports previous findings and further informs the rational and evidence-informed clinical use of ivabradine.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Progression; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance.. To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent.. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists.. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion.. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables.. We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence).. We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cause of Death; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ranolazine

Increase in heart rate represents a significant contribution in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and heart failure, by promoting atherosclerotic process and endothelial dysfunction. Thus, it negatively influences cardiovascular risk in the general population. The aim of this review is to analyze the current, controversial, and future role of ivabradine as an anti-anginal agent in the setting of coronary artery disease without heart failure. Ivabradine represents a selective heart rate-lowering agent that increased diastolic perfusion time and improving energetics in the ischemic myocardium.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Among the innovative drugs recently introduced for the management of chronic stable angina, Ranolazine and ivabradine represent two most true innovations. In fact, even if both drugs act by reducing myocardial work and thus oxygen consumption, this happens by a peculiar mechanism unlike that of conventional antischemic drugs. Ranolazine mediates its antianginal effects by the inhibition of cardiac late sodium current. This improves myocardial relaxation favoring myocardial perfusion. Ivabradine is a selective If channel blocker and acts by reducing firing rate of pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node, without affecting the duration of action potential. The reduction of heart rate causes a reduction of left ventricular end diastolic pressure and increases the time useful to coronary flow by a prolongation of the diastole. A body of evidence found that two drugs are useful in ischemic patients whether at rest or during exercise. In addition, they can be used in monotherapy or in association with other conventional anti-ischemic drugs. The two medications could be used with advantage also in microvascular angina when standard therapy is ineffective. Thus, the two drugs represent an adjunctive and powerful therapeutic modality for the treatment of chronic stable angina, especially when conventional antianginal drugs were insufficient or inadequate.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Myocardial Ischemia; Oxygen Consumption; Ranolazine

Topics: Angina, Stable; Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Drug Interactions; Drug Labeling; Humans; Off-Label Use; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ranolazine; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome

To conduct a systematic review of the evidence regarding the economic value of ranolazine relative to standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment of symptomatic chronic stable angina (CSA). Electronic databases were searched using relevant keywords. The identified studies were independently reviewed by two investigators against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Their data were extracted using a relevant form and consequently were synthesized. Studies were also evaluated using the Quality of Health Economic Studies scale. The main outcomes considered were the cost and effectiveness for each comparator and the incremental cost per quality-adjusted-life year (QALY) gained. Six studies were included in the review. Five of these assessed the cost-utility of ranolazine added to SOC, compared to SOC alone, using decision trees or Markov models whereas one was a retrospective cost evaluation study. The analysis was conducted from a payer perspective in five studies and from a societal perspective in one study with the time horizon varying between six months and a year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), ranged from €4000 to €15,000 per QALY gained. Ranolazine appears to be dominant or cost-effective, mainly due to its ability to decrease angina-related hospitalizations and also due to a marginal improvement in quality of life. The acquisition cost of ranolazine was the variable with the greatest impact upon the ICER. The existing evidence, although limited, indicates that ranolazine may be a dominant or cost-effective therapy option, for the treatment of patients with symptomatic CSA. Further research is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranolazine.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome

Many studies show that ivabradine is effective for stable angina.This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of treatment duration and control group type on ivabradine efficacy in stable angina pectoris.Relevant articles in the English language in the PUBMED and EMBASE databases and related websites were identified by using the search terms "ivabradine," "angina," "randomized controlled trials," and "Iva." The final search date was November 2, 2015.Articles were included if they were published randomized controlled trials that related to ivabradine treatment of stable angina pectoris.Patients with stable angina pectoris were included.The patients were classified according to treatment duration (<3 vs ≥3 months) or type of control group (placebo vs beta-receptor blocker). Angina outcomes were heart rate at rest or peak, exercise duration, and time to angina onset.Seven articles were selected. There were 3747 patients: 2100 and 1647 were in the ivabradine and control groups, respectively. The ivabradine group had significantly longer exercise duration when they had been treated for at least 3 months, but not when treatment time was less than 3 months. Ivabradine significantly improved time to angina onset regardless of treatment duration. Control group type did not influence the effect of exercise duration (significant) or time to angina onset (significant).Compared with beta-blocker and placebo, ivabradine improved exercise duration and time to onset of angina in patients with stable angina. However, its ability to improve exercise duration only became significant after at least 3 months of treatment.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Ivabradine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Percutaneous coronary intervention and anti-anginal medications have similar prognostic effectiveness in patients with chronic stable angina. The choice of optimal medical therapy for the management of chronic angina is of pivotal importance in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. The most commonly used anti-anginal agents have demonstrated equivalent efficacy in improving patient reported ischemic symptoms and quantitative exercise parameters. With regards to mortality, beta-blockers are beneficial only in the setting of depressed left ventricular systolic function after a recent myocardial infarction. Recent evidence suggests the lack of any benefit of beta-blockers in patients with preserved systolic function, even in the setting of prior myocardial infarction.Ranolazine is a non-haemodynamic anti-anginal agent. It is effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic stable angina whose symptoms are un-adequately controlled by conventional treatment. The clinical development program of ranolazine has shown that the drug improves exercise performance, decreases angina and use of sublingual nitrates, compared to placebo. Ranolazine is well tolerated with neutral effect on haemodynamics. Besides its role in chronic stable angina, ranolazine has the potential for development in a number of other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions in the future.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Ranolazine

Despite continuous advances in myocardial revascularization procedures and intracoronary devices, patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) still experience worse prognosis and poor quality of life (QoL). Indeed, chronic stable angina (CSA) is a common disease with a large burden on healthcare costs. Traditionally, CSA is interpreted as episodes of reversible myocardial ischemia related to the presence of stable coronary artery plaque causing myocardial demand/supply mismatch when myocardial oxygen consumption increases. Accordingly, revascularization procedures are performed with the aim to remove the flow limiting stenosis, whereas traditional medical therapy (hemodynamic agents) aims at reducing myocardial oxygen demands. However, although effective, none of these treatment strategies or their combination is either able to confer symptomatic relief in all patients, nor to reduce mortality. Failure to significantly improve QoL and prognosis may be attributed at least in part to this "restrictive" understanding of IHD. Despite for many years myocardial metabolic derangement has been overlooked, recently it has gained increased attention with the development of new pharmacological agents (metabolic modulators) able to influence myocardial substrate selection and utilization thus improving cardiac efficiency. Shifting cardiac metabolism from free fatty acids (FA) towards glucose is a promising approach for the treatment of patients with stable angina, independently of the underling disease (macrovascular and/or microvascular disease). In this sense cardiac metabolic modulators open the way to a "revolutionary" understanding of ischemic heart disease and its common clinical manifestations, where myocardial ischemia is no longer considered as the mere oxygen and metabolites demand/supply unbalance, but as an energetic disorder. Keeping in mind such an alternative approach to the disease, development of new pharmacological agents directed toward multiple metabolic targets is mandatory.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Myocardium

Guidelines provide recommendations to improve patient outcomes, but many of the recommendations made for treating patients with stable angina are opinion based rather than evidence based. Risk stratification to predict patients at an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and sudden ischemic death, and selection of patients for possible revascularization, is based on expert opinion. Randomized trials have compared optimal medical therapy to revascularization, after the coronary anatomy was known, and yet routine coronary angiography to exclude left main disease is not recommended. What exactly is optimal antianginal treatment varies considerably from one country's guideline recommendations to another. None of the antianginal drugs reduce mortality or MI and these drugs are equally effective in treating angina pectoris; and yet beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are recommended as first line therapy. Double and triple therapy with different classes of antianginal drugs is also expert opinion based rather than evidence based. Recommendations to reduce the incidence of MI and sudden death are appropriate; however the use of a potent, high dose statin, is recommended by AHA/ACC and NICE guidelines for all patients with ischemic heart disease, while the European guidelines recommend a target LDL goal in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Management of patients with stable angina pectoris with normal coronary arteries remains ambiguous. This short review critically appraises the recommendations for managing patients with stable angina pectoris.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prognosis

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major cause of death and disability among Western countries and angina pectoris is the most prevalent symptomatic manifestation. Strategies to improve management of chronic stable angina are a priority. Areas covered: A comprehensive review was conducted using the Medline and Cochrane databases as well as the clinical trial databases in the United States and Europe. Traditional therapies for angina will be discussed. This review particularly emphasizes investigational therapies for angina (including pharmacological agents, cell and gene based therapies, and herbal medications). Expert opinion: There has been renewed interest in older anti-angina agents (e.g., perhexiline, amiodarone, and phosphodiestrase-5 inhibitors). Other anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., allopurinol and febuxostat) are currently undergoing evaluation for angina therapy. Therapeutic angiogenesis continues to face some challenges. Future trials should evaluate the optimum patient population that would benefit from this form of therapy.

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Drugs, Investigational; Genetic Therapy; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia

Stable angina is the most frequent manifestation of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women as compared to men (65% versus 37%). IHD in women has more favorable clinical course because myocardial infarction develops twice as rare as in men. Coronary angiography of angina patients demonstrates normal coronary arteries more frequently in women than in men. Microvascular angina (MVA) is found to be a rather common form of stable IHD as that particular diagnosis is made later in 20-30% of patients who previously underwent coronary angiography. The disease occurs three times as often in women than in men irrespective of age. Most of these patients are in their perimenopausal age - 45-60 years. The major role in MVA development is considered to be decreased coronary flow reserve resulting from evident endothelial dysfunction of minor coronary arteries. MVA is characterized by great variability of its course and low response to conventional antianginal therapy, particularly in women. In view of this the problem of antianginal drugs which can be used in addition to standard therapy remains to be solved. Ranolazine is a new original antianginal medicine which improves left ventricular diastolic filling by selective inhibition of late Na-flow leading to more effective coronary vessels filling in diastole. The article presents the results of multicenter studies of ranolazine as to its effect on diastolic and systolic functions of the left ventricle, clinical manifestations of angina and heart failure as well as the data on antiarrhythmic action of ranolazine. This article describes the case of successful use of ranolazine as an additional anti-anginal medicine in the 46- year-old female patient diagnosed with microvascular angina. Before taking ranolazine, on the background of conventional treatment of coronary heart disease, the patient developed stable angina and persistent left bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation. After receiving ranolazine, 1000 mg per day for a month, Holter ECG monitoring showed not only significantly reduced number of strokes, the left bundle branch block and atrial fibrillation dissappeared as well. The results indicate a high efficiency of ranolazine as an antianginal, anti-ischemic and anti-arrythmic medicine.

Topics: Adult; Angina, Stable; Atrial Fibrillation; Bundle-Branch Block; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Microvascular Angina; Middle Aged; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome

First-line medical management of stable angina generally involves a beta-blocker (BB) or calcium channel blocker (CCB), with other classes of medication being added if symptom control is inadequate. Evidence supporting the appropriate choice of a second-line agent is currently unclear. The objective of this systematic review was to quantify the clinical benefit of BB, CCBs, long-acting nitrates (LANs), ranolazine, trimetazidine, ivabradine or nicorandil added to first-line monotherapy for stable coronary artery disease.. Randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of antianginal therapies in patients with stable angina refractory to first-line therapy were identified from a literature search. Exercise tolerance test (ETT) data and clinical outcomes were extracted and combined in a series of meta-analyses.. A total of 46 qualifying studies were identified, evaluating 71 treatment comparisons. The combination of ranolazine added to CCB or BB showed positive outcomes across all outcomes assessed. Other combinations of BB, CCB, LAN and trimetazidine showed significant benefits for most but not all outcomes. Ivabradine demonstrated benefits for ETT assessments but these were not matched in clinical domains. No qualifying studies were identified for nicorandil in an add-on role.. Across a range of commonly assessed exercise and clinical outcomes, the effectiveness of BB+CCB used in combination is broadly confirmed. Ranolazine used with BB or CCB showed benefits across all outcomes assessed, while LAN and trimetazidine used with BB or CCB have shown benefits across some outcomes. Ivabradine added to BB shows inconsistent effects from a single study, whilst there is no relevant evidence for nicorandil.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation; Vasodilator Agents

Since the first human catheterization performed by Forssman in 1929 angioplasty equipment and medical therapies have undergone considerable evolution and technical improvement allowing interventionalists to perform more complex procedures and solving most of the percutaneous limitations. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has dramatically changed the outcome in the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) setting, its role in the treatment of chronic stable angina is still debated. Stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) is a major public health issue and its prevalence is still increasing in the industrialized world. The correct treatment sees a multi-strategy approach aimed to a relief of symptoms, prevention of future cardiac events and survival improvement. In so forth, treatment strategies include optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone or combined with percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization. Despite this, angina remains poorly controlled in the vast majority of CAD patients. Traditional agents such Beta-blockers or Calcium channel blockers or short and long acting nitrates have been used as first-line anti-anginal therapy for several years. Nowadays newer and more effective drugs usually used on top of older medical treatment have become available.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Animals; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Ivabradine; Nicorandil; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ranolazine; Trimetazidine

Chronic stable angina is a significant problem in older adults. The goal of therapy is to provide symptomatic relief, improve patient quality of life, and prevent subsequent angina or myocardial infarction that could lead to sudden death. The efficacy and safety of drugs such as beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for managing chronic stable angina in older adults has not been rigorously investigated. Drug selection should be based on physiologic alterations, patient comorbidities, adverse reaction profile, and cost.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Isosorbide Dinitrate; Ivabradine; Nicorandil; Nitroglycerin; Ranolazine; Sodium Channel Blockers; Vasodilator Agents

Current therapy for stable angina includes surgical and percutaneous revascularization, which has been improved tremendously over the last decades. Smoking cessation and regular exercise are the cornerstone for prevention of further cerebrovascular events. Medical treatment includes treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and antithrombotic management, which can be a challenge in some patients. Owing to the fact the coronary revascularization is readily accessible these days in many industrialized countries, the importance of antianginal therapy has decreased over the past years. This article presents a contemporary overview of the management of patients with stable angina in the year 2015.

Topics: Algorithms; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Exercise; Humans; Life Style; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Smoking Cessation

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a well-established risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with CAD and comorbid T2D also have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications, such as silent ischemia and stable angina. In treating the symptoms of stable angina in patients with CAD and comorbid T2D, it is vital to utilize therapies that reduce symptoms and improve outcomes. At the same time, there is significant concern about the preservation of glycometabolic parameters, such as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), particularly because some antianginal therapies, such as β-blockers and calcium channel blockers-although effective at improving the symptoms of stable angina and reducing ischemia-may also worsen glycemic control by increasing HbA1c levels. Available trial data on the efficacy of antianginal agents in patients with stable angina and comorbid T2D are limited. Therefore, in patients with stable angina and T2D, a tailored approach to treatment of stable angina by selecting therapies with a neutral or positive glycometabolic profile may improve outcomes and increase treatment compliance. Additionally, patients with a dual diagnosis may benefit from therapies that have beneficial effects on both stable angina and T2D, thereby reducing polypharmacy. Prospective studies in patients with stable angina and T2D are needed to guide therapy decisions.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Agents; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Polypharmacy; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Life Style; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Revascularization; Patient Education as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Chronic stable angina is the most common manifestation of ischaemic heart disease in the developed world and is associated with impaired quality of life and increased mortality. The pathogenesis of stable angina is complex and often, albeit not always, involves flow-limiting epicardial coronary artery stenoses (atheromatous plaques) that reduce the ability of the coronary circulation to deliver appropriate blood supply to the myocardium. The coronary microcirculation can also play an important role. An imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and metabolic oxygen demand causes the symptoms of angina pectoris and represents a major therapeutic target. Rational treatment requires a multi-faceted approach combining lifestyle changes, aggressive management of modifiable coronary artery disease risk factors, pharmacological therapy and myocardial revascularisation when appropriate. Despite modern therapies, many patients continue to suffer from angina. Several new anti-anginal drugs have been introduced that might allow more effective symptom control. These novel agents have specific mechanisms of action and fewer side effects compared to conventional drugs. The combined use of traditional and novel treatments is likely to increase the proportion of patients who are managed successfully with medical therapy alone. This article briefly reviews recent advances in the pharmacological management of chronic stable angina pectoris, highlighting how an understanding of the prevailing pathogenic mechanisms in the individual patient can aid appropriate selection of therapeutic strategies and improve clinical outcome.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Circulation; Humans

Coronary heart disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, and is responsible for approximately one of every six deaths in the US. Angina pectoris is a clinical syndrome characterized by discomfort, typically in the chest, neck, chin, or left arm, induced by physical exertion, emotional stress, or cold, and relieved by rest or nitroglycerin. The main goals of treatment of stable angina pectoris are to improve quality of life by reducing the severity and/or frequency of symptoms, to increase functional capacity, and to improve prognosis. Ranolazine is a recently developed antianginal with unique methods of action. In this paper, we review the pharmacology of ranolazine, clinical trials supporting its approval for clinical use, and studies of its quality of life benefits. We conclude that ranolazine has been shown to be a reasonable and safe option for patients who have refractory ischemic symptoms despite the use of standard medications (for example, nitrates, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, and calcium channel antagonists) for treatment of anginal symptoms, and also provides a modestly improved quality of life.

Topics: Acetanilides; Angina, Stable; Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome

Stable angina is a form of coronary artery disease. Its potential to progress requires the most appropriate treatment in order to reduce the incapacitating effect of an acute angina attack and to avoid long-term cardiovascular events. With or without revascularization, pharmacological treatment is an essential component of this treatment strategy, which also involves lifestyle and diet. Statins and aspirin have been shown to be effective in preventing different aspects of coronary artery disease overall. The efficacy of other classes of treatment has been demonstrated in contexts such as stable angina (including postmyocardial infarction) and heart failure (under specific conditions of dosing) for beta-blockers and in contexts such as heart failure, postinfarction and following revascularization for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Along with the oldest classes of treatment, such as nitrates (and related derivatives), beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, new classes of treatments with entirely (trimetazidine, ivabradine) or partly (nicorandil) different mechanisms of action have now been added. The latest antianginal to obtain marketing authorization, ranolazine, is not yet available in France. The different levels of evidence of the efficacy of these pharmacological products vary greatly and overall are higher for those developed most recently. None is devoid of side effects, which must be taken into account in these patients, many of whom are elderly and polymedicated.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Multivessel coronary disease is more common in elderly. What to choose as a primary strategy in elderly patients with stable angina: revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or aortocoronary bypass surgery) with intensive pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle intervention (optimal medical therapy) or optimal medical therapy alone? Clinical trials comparing these two approaches have shown that elderly benefit more from revascularization than younger patients. There is no doubt that multivessel disease requires a heart-team to select the optimal management. Age by itself is not a criterion to select the treatment strategies. One need to consider many other factors: medical findings, angiography, the patient's desire, social, cultural factors and other parameters. Patients should be given full and objective information.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Disease Management; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Patient Participation; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Reduction Behavior; Severity of Illness Index

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently performed for stable angina. However, the first blinded trial, ORBITA, did not show a placebo-controlled increment in exercise time in patients with single-vessel disease, at 6 weeks, on maximal antianginal therapy. ORBITA-2 will assess the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI on angina frequency in patients with single- or multivessel disease, at 12 weeks, on no antianginal therapy. ORBITA-2 is a double-blind placebo-controlled trial randomising participants with (i) angina at presentation, (ii) documented angina during the 2-week pre-randomisation symptom assessment phase, (iii) objective evidence of ischaemia, (iv) single- or multivessel disease, and (v) clinical eligibility for PCI. At enrolment, antianginals will be stopped, and angina questionnaires completed. Participants will record their symptoms on a smartphone application daily throughout the trial and will undergo exercise treadmill testing and stress echocardiography at pre-randomisation. They will then undergo coronary angiography with unblinded invasive physiology assessment. Eligible participants will then be sedated to a deep level of conscious sedation and randomised 1:1 between PCI and placebo. After the 12-week blinded follow-up period, they will return for questionnaires, exercise testing and stress echocardiography assessment. If angina becomes intolerable, antianginals will be introduced using a prespecified medication protocol. The primary outcome is an angina symptom score using an ordinal clinical outcome scale for angina. Secondary outcomes include exercise treadmill time, angina frequency, angina severity and quality of life. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03742050.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

It's a challenge for detecting the therapeutic targets of a polypharmacological drug from variations in the responsed networks in the differentiated populations with complex diseases, as stable coronary heart disease. Here, in an adaptive, 31-center, randomized, double-blind trial involving 920 patients with moderate symptomatic stable angina treated by 14-day Danhong injection(DHI), a kind of polypharmacological drug with high quality control, or placebo (0.9% saline), with 76-day following-up, we firstly confirmed that DHI could increase the proportion of patients with clinically significant changes on angina-frequency assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (ΔSAQ-AF ≥ 20) (12.78% at Day 30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.86-19.71%, P = 0.0003, 13.82% at Day 60, 95% CI 6.82-20.82%, P = 0.0001 and 8.95% at Day 90, 95% CI 2.06-15.85%, P = 0.01). We also found that there were no significant differences in new-onset major vascular events (P = 0.8502) and serious adverse events (P = 0.9105) between DHI and placebo. After performing the RNA sequencing in 62 selected patients, we developed a systemic modular approach to identify differentially expressed modules (DEMs) of DHI with the Z

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Salvia Miltiorrhiza Depside Salt (SMDS) was extracted from Salvia miltiorrhiza with high-quality control of active principles. In 2005, China's FDA approved the use of SMDS for stable angina pectoris (SAP), but the evidence of SMDS combined with aspirin remains unclear.. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of SMDS combined with aspirin in patients with SAP.. A multicenter, pragmatic, three-armed parallel group and an individually randomized controlled superiority trial was designed. Participants aged 35 to 75 years old with SAP were recruited from four "Class Ⅲ Grade A" hospitals in China. Participants who were randomized into the SMDS group were treated with SMDS by intravenous drip. Participants in the control group received aspirin enteric-coated tablets (aspirin). Participants who were randomly assigned to the combination group received SMDS combined with aspirin. All participants received standard care from clinicians, without any restrictions. The primary outcome measure was thromboelastography (TEG). Secondary outcome measures included symptom score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), visual analogue scale (VAS) score of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) symptoms, platelet aggregation measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), and fasting blood glucose. Effectiveness evaluation data were collected at baseline and ten days after treatment. Researchers followed up with participants for one month after treatment to determine whether adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as bleeding tendency occurred. All statistical calculations were carried out with R 3.5.3 statistical analysis software.. A total of 135 participants completed follow-up data on the primary outcome after ten days of treatment. Participants in the SMDS combined aspirin group had the highest improvement rate of sensitivity in AA% [p < 0.001, 95% CI (0.00-0.00)], from 30.6% before treatment to 81.6% after treatment. Participants with drug resistance (AA% < 20%) in the SMDS combined with aspirin group also had the highest sensitivity rate [p < 0.001, 95% CI (0.00-0.00)] after treatment (accounting for 81.0% of the combination group and 60.7% of the sensitive participants). The improvement of TCM symptoms in participants treated with SMDS combined with aspirin was significantly better than that of the aspirin group [MD = 1.71, 95% CI (0.15-3.27), p = 0.032]. There were no significant differences in other indexes (R, TPI, MA, K, CI, α value) of TEG, SAQ, platelet aggregation and fasting blood glucose among the three groups. No bleeding tendency or ADRs occurred in all participants.. SMDS combined with aspirin is a clinically effective and safe intervention to treat adults aged 35 and older with SAP. This trial shows that SMDS combined with aspirin can significantly improve the sensitivity rate of AA% in TEG and the VAS score of TCM symptoms. Further large samples and high-quality research are needed to determine if certain participants might benefit more from SMDS combined with aspirin. The study protocol was registered in the Clinical Trials USA registry (registration No. NCT02694848).

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Creatinine; Depsides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Salvia miltiorrhiza; Thrombelastography; Treatment Outcome

The ORBITA trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a placebo procedure for patients with stable angina was conducted across six sites in the United Kingdom via home monitoring and telephone consultations. Patients underwent detailed assessment of medication adherence which allowed us to measure the efficacy of the implementation of the optimization protocol and interpretation of the main trial endpoints.. Prescribing data were collected throughout the trial. Self-reported adherence was assessed, and urine samples collected at pre-randomization and at follow-up for direct assessment of adherence using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC MS/MS).. Self-reported adherence was >96% for all drugs in both treatment groups at both stages. The percentage of samples in which drug was detected at pre-randomization and at follow-up in the PCI versus placebo groups respectively was: clopidogrel, 96% versus 90% and 98% versus 94%; atorvastatin, 95% versus 92% and 92% versus 91%; perindopril, 95% versus 97% and 85% versus 100%; bisoprolol, 98% versus 99% and 96% versus 97%; amlodipine, 99% versus 99% and 94% versus 96%; nicorandil, 98% versus 96% and 94% versus 92%; ivabradine, 100% versus 100% and 100% versus 100%; and ranolazine, 100% versus 100% and 100% versus 100%.. Adherence levels were high throughout the study when quantified by self-reporting methods and similarly high proportions of drug were detected by urinary assay. The results indicate successful implementation of the optimization protocol delivered by telephone, an approach that could serve as a model for treatment of chronic conditions, particularly as consultations are increasingly conducted online.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Self Report; Single-Blind Method; Telemedicine; United Kingdom

There is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with grey zone fractional flow reserve (. We enrolled 104 patients with angina with 1:1 randomisation to PCI or OMT. The artery was interrogated with a Doppler flow/pressure wire. Patients underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with follow-up at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome was angina status at 3 months using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).. 104 patients (age 60±9 years), 79 (76%) males and 79 (76%) Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenoses were randomised. Coronary physiology and SAQ were similar. Of 98 patients with stress perfusion MRI data, 17 (17%) had abnormal perfusion (≥2 segments with ≥25% ischaemia or ≥1 segment with ≥50% ischaemia) in the target. Non-invasive evidence of major ischaemia is uncommon in patients with. NCT02425969.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color; Female; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Symptom Assessment

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral Guanxinshutong (GXST) capsules in Chinese patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) in a prospective, multicenter, double-Blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02280850).. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to the GXST or placebo group. Current standard antianginal treatment except for nitrate drugs was continued in both groups, who received an additional 4-week treatment of GXST capsule or placebo. Primary endpoint was the change from baseline in angina attack frequency after the 4-week treatment. Secondary endpoints included the reduction of nitroglycerin dose, score of Seatntle Agina Questionnaire, exercise tolerance test defined as time to onset of chest pain and ST-segment depression at least 1 mm greater than the resting one.. A total of 300 SAP patients from 12 centers in China were enrolled between January 2013 and October 2015, and they were randomly divided into the GXST group and the placebo group (150 patients in each group). Of whom, 287 patients completed the study (143 patients in the GXST group, 144 patients in the placebo group). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. After 4-week treatment with GXST capsules, the number of angina attacks and the consumption of short-acting nitrates were significantly reduced. In addition, the quality of life of patients were also substantially improved in the GXST group. No significant differences in the time of onset of angina and 1-mm ST segment depression were noted between the two groups. 7 patients (4.1%) in the GXST group and 3 patients (2.1%) in the placebo group reported at least one adverse event, respectively.. GXST capsules are beneficial for the treatment of SAP patients.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; China; Double-Blind Method; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

The ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro, O-SES) exhibits satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, no report to date has documented the intravascular status of artery repair after O-SES implantation. We examined 5 O-SES placed in 4 patients (age 65 ± 12 years, male 75%) presenting with stable angina pectoris due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Coronary angioscopy was performed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 year later. Angioscopic images were analyzed to determine the following: (1) dominant grade of neointimal coverage (NIC) over the stent; (2) maximum yellow plaque grade; and (3) existence of thrombus. Yellow plaque grade was evaluated both immediately after stent implantation and at the time of follow-up observation. The other parameters were evaluated at the time of follow-up examination. NIC was graded as: grade 0, stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. Yellow plaque severity was graded as: grade 0, white; grade 1, light yellow; grade 2, yellow; and grade 3, intensive yellow. Angioscopic findings at 1 year demonstrated the following: dominant NIC grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 in 1, 2, and 2 stents, respectively; all stents were covered to some extent; focal thrombus adhesion was observed in only 1 stent. Yellow plaque grade did not change from immediately after stent implantation to follow-up. O-SES demonstrated satisfactory arterial repair 1 year after implantation.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angioscopy; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (PF-AES) represent a novel elution technology in the current era of drug-eluting stents. The clinical safety and efficacy of PF-AES as compared with latest-generation permanent-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (PP-ZES) have not yet been investigated in a large randomized trial.. In this physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, an all-comers population requiring percutaneous coronary intervention was enrolled across 3 European sites. Randomization (1:1 ratio) to PP-ZES or PF-AES was performed after stratification for troponin status and diabetes mellitus. In both treatment arms, troponin-positive patients were planned for 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas troponin-negative patients were planned for 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. Outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated treatment. The device-oriented primary end point of target-lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 12-months as analyzed by modified intention-to-treat (80% power, and a 3.5% noninferiority margin).. In total, 1502 patients were randomized and 1491 treated with the assigned stent and available for follow-up. The primary end point occurred in 42 (5.6%) of the 744 patients receiving PP-ZES versus 46 (6.2%) of the 747 patients receiving PF-AES. PF-AES were clinically noninferior to PP-ZES (risk difference, 0.5%; upper limit 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.6%; P. PF-AES were noninferior to PP-ZES regarding target-lesion failure at 12 months. Findings regarding the secondary end point and prespecified subgroups were generally consistent with that of the primary end point.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02328898.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Even in the current drug-eluting stent era, revascularization for coronary stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR) between 0.75 and 0.80, the so-called "gray zone," is a matter of debate. Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding outcomes of revascularization versus deferral for coronary stenosis when FFR values are in the gray zone, but these studies have had differing designs and populations. We therefore will investigate whether medical therapy plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to medical therapy alone in reducing major cardiovascular events in patients presenting with coronary stenosis with gray zone FFR values.. This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel group, randomized, controlled, superiority study. A total of 410 eligible participants will be recruited and randomized to either the medical therapy plus PCI group or the medical therapy alone group. The primary endpoint is 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a combined endpoint of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or unplanned target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints include MACE at 2 and 5 years. Moreover, each individual component of the primary endpoint, cardiovascular death, target vessel-related and non-target vessel-related MI, all MI, clinically driven TVR or non-TVR, all revascularization, stent thrombosis, and angina symptom status will be evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 years.. This is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study to investigate the superiority of medical therapy plus PCI over medical therapy by itself in reducing major cardiovascular events in patients presenting with coronary stenosis with "gray zone" FFR values. The results will help interventional cardiologists in making revascularization decisions regarding coronary stenosis with gray zone FFR values.. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000031526 . Registered on 1 March 2018.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiovascular Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Japan; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ranolazine is a novel anti-angina treatment approved in the United States for chronic stable angina. Ranolazine pharmacokinetics have not been studied previously in patients who receive maintenance hemodialysis. This study describes the pharmacokinetics of ranolazine and three major metabolites (CVT-2738, CVT-2512, CVT-2514) in patients receiving thrice weekly hemodialysis.. Eight participants receiving maintenance hemodialysis completed this prospective, open-label study (study identifier NCT01435174 at Clinicaltrials.gov). Three participants received a single tablet of ranolazine 500 mg (followed by an interim analysis), and five received 2 tablets of ranolazine 500 mg. Blood samples were collected over 65 h to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics during and between hemodialysis sessions. Non-compartmental analysis was used to determine the individual pharmacokinetic parameters.. Ranolazine off-hemodialysis elimination phase half-lives were 3.6 and 3.9 h for 500 mg and 1000 mg doses, respectively. The time to maximum concentration ranged from 2 to 18 hours and the average maximum concentration was 0.65 ± 0.27 mcg/mL and 1.18 ± 0.48 mcg/mL for ranolazine 500 mg and 1000 mg dose, respectively. The mean hemodialysis percent reduction ratio for the ranolazine 500 mg dose was 52.3 ± 8.1% and for the ranolazine 1000 mg dose was 69.2 ± 37.6%.. Data on ranolazine dosing in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis is almost non-existent. Given the extent of pharmacokinetic variability observed with the 500 mg and 1000 mg oral doses of ranolazine, neither can be recommended as a starting dose in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Guided by the information gained form this study about the extent of hemodialytic drug clearance, further multi-dose clinical trials of ranolazine are needed to optimize therapeutic outcomes in this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Angina, Stable; Area Under Curve; Biological Variation, Population; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Ranolazine; Renal Dialysis; Tablets; Young Adult

To assess the safety and efficacy of the novel Resolute (R-) Onyx drug-eluting stent (DES).. The R-Onyx DES consists of a composite wire with an outer shell of cobalt chromium alloy and a platinum-iridium inner core to enhance radiopacity, with thinner, swaged struts and modified stent geometry compared with the predicate Resolute DES, resulting in a slightly lower total drug load in most sizes.. This was a prospective, single-arm non-inferiority trial compared with a historical control. Patients with stable angina/ischemia and up to 2 de novo target lesions ≤35 mm long with reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.25-4.2 mm were enrolled. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 8-month follow-up. Propensity-score adjusted outcomes from the single-arm RESOLUTE-US trial served as the control.. Seventy-five patients (85 lesions) were enrolled. Mean patient age was 66 ± 9 years, 73% were male, and 32% had diabetes. Mean lesion length was 14.28 ± 6.68 mm, mean RVD was 2.57 ± 0.48 mm, and 86% of lesions were class B2/C. In-stent late lumen loss at 8 months was 0.24 ± 0.39 mm with R-Onyx DES compared with 0.36 ± 0.52 mm with Resolute DES (P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.029 for superiority). At 8 months, clinically driven target lesion revascularization occurred in 3 patients (4.0%) and target lesion failure occurred in 5 patients (6.7%).. In-stent late lumen loss is non-inferior, and appears to be superior, with the thin-strut novel composite wire R-Onyx DES compared with Resolute DES. Continued evolution of stent design can improve angiographic outcomes in complex lesions, even in the current era of next-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Iridium; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

Heart rate (HR) reduction is an integral part of antianginal therapy, but many patients do not reach the guideline-recommended target of less than 60 bpm despite high use of beta-blockers (BB). Failure to uptitrate BB doses may be partly to blame. To explore other options for lowering HR and improving angina control, CONTROL-2 was initiated to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of BBs with ivabradine versus uptitration of BBs to maximal tolerated dose, in patients with stable angina.. This multicenter, open, randomized study included 1104 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II or III stable angina, in sinus rhythm, and on background stable treatment with non-maximal recommended doses of BBs. Consecutive patients were allocated to ivabradine + BB or BB uptitration in a 4:1 ratio.. At the end of the study (week 16), addition of ivabradine to BB treatment and BB uptitration resulted in reduction in HR (61 ± 6 vs. 63 ± 8 bpm; p = 0.001). At week 16, significantly more patients on ivabradine + BB were in CCS class I than with BB uptitration (37.1% vs. 28%; p = 0.017) and significantly more patients were angina-free (50.6% vs. 34.2%; p < 0.001). Patient health status based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was also better in the ivabradine + BB group. Adverse events (AEs) were significantly more common with BB uptitration than with the ivabradine + BB combination (18.4% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001).. In patients with stable angina, combination therapy with ivabradine + BB demonstrated good tolerability, safety, and more pronounced clinical improvement, compared to BB uptitration.. ISRCTN30654443.. Servier.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Canada; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Despite major advances in managing coronary artery disease and continuous research on alternative techniques to enhance myocardial perfusion and reduce symptoms, coronary artery disease is still one of the leading causes of adult disability worldwide. Cardiac shock-wave therapy (CSWT) has shown promising results in the amelioration of myocardial ischemia in experimental studies; however, clinical results are limited to single-center, mostly uncontrolled and underpowered trials. The current study aimed to evaluate whether CSWT can improve exercise tolerance and relieve angina symptoms in addition to optimal medical treatment in patients with stable angina.. A prospective, randomized, triple blind, sham-procedure-controlled study was carried out. The primary endpoint was total exercise duration in the modified Bruce treadmill test at the 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were changes in ST-segment depression during the treadmill test, angina symptoms during the treadmill test, number of angina attacks per week, number of sublingual nitroglycerin consumption per week, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina functional class, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score at the 6-month follow-up. Patients were randomized at a 1 : 1 ratio to optimal medical plus cardiac shock-wave therapy (OMT+CSWT) and optimal medical therapy with sham procedure (OMT+placebo) groups.. The mean exercise time improved in both study arms - CSWT and placebo treatment - at the 3- and 6-month follow-up, without a significant difference between groups. The magnitude and frequency of peak exercise ST-segment depression reduced significantly in the CSWT+OMT group compared with the OMT+placebo group at the 6-month follow-up (51.4 vs. 90.6%, P=0.001). Percentage of angina-free patients increased progressively in both groups throughout the study. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores improved significantly in both arms for four of five domains at the 3- and the 6-month follow-up. Numerically, although insignificant, the decrease in the number of angina episodes was more prominent in the OMT+CSWT group compared with the OMT+placebo group.. The total exercise duration in the modified Bruce treadmill test at the 6-month follow-up did not differ significantly in patients treated with CSWT compared with optimal medical therapy alone. In addition, CSWT exerted a neutral effect on the quality of life and level of angina.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Electrocardiography; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Female; High-Energy Shock Waves; Humans; Lithuania; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Recovery of Function; Russia; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of a dedicated drug-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary lesions with very small reference vessel diameter (RVD).. Smaller RVD is associated with increased risk for restenosis and target lesion failure (TLF) after stent implantation.. This was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was 12-month TLF, which was compared with a pre-specified performance goal. Subjects with stable or unstable angina or ischemia, target lesions ≤27 mm in length, and RVD ≥2.0 and <2.25 mm were eligible for enrollment. A subset of subjects underwent follow-up angiography at 13 months post-procedure.. A total of 101 subjects with 104 lesions were enrolled. The mean age was 67.3 ± 9.6 years, 47% of subjects had diabetes, the mean lesion length was 12.6 ± 6.3 mm, and the mean RVD was 1.91 ± 0.26 mm. The rate of TLF at 12 months was 5.0%, fulfilling the pre-specified performance goal of 19% (p < 0.001). The rates of target lesion revascularization and target vessel myocardial infarction were 2.0% and 3.0%, respectively. There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. In-stent late lumen loss was 0.26 ± 0.48 mm, and the rate of binary restenosis was 12.0%.. In this first report of a drug-eluting stent with a dedicated size to treat lesions with RVD <2.25 mm, the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent was associated with a low rate of TLF and late lumen loss, without a signal for stent thrombosis. This novel-sized drug-eluting stent appears to be a feasible option for the treatment of coronary lesions in extremely small vessels. (Medtronic Resolute Onyx 2.0 mm Clinical Study; NCT02412501).

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A. This is a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive clinical trial. A total of 156 patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to either the Danshen extract (DanshenDuofensuanyan injection and Danshen drop spill) group or the placebo group in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will then undergo treatment with DanshenDuofensuanyan injection or placebo (glucose) during hospitalization, followed by open-label Danshen drop spill (30 pills/day) in Danshen extract group for 60 days after discharge. Because this is an adaptive trial, two interim analyses are prospectively planned. These will be performed after one-third and two-thirds of the patients, respectively, have completed the trial. On the basis of the results of these interim analyses, a data monitoring committee will determine how to modify aspects of the study without undermining the validity and integrity of the trial. The primary outcome measure is the serum level of Lp-PLA. This study will provide evidence that Danshen extract is beneficial for stable angina and may establish a possible mechanism of Danshen treatment effects on cardiovascular disease. This study may also validate an objective blood test (LP-PLA. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02870764 . Registered on 13 August 2016.

Topics: 1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine Esterase; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angina, Stable; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; China; Clinical Protocols; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Salvia miltiorrhiza; Single-Blind Method; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Elevated heart rate can increase myocardial oxygen demand and reduce myocardial perfusion, provoking myocardial ischemia and angina symptoms. We evaluated adding ivabradine to the therapy of patients on metoprolol.. ADDITIONS (prActical Daily efficacy anD safety of Procoralan® In combinaTION with betablockerS) was a multicenter, 4-month, noninterventional, prospective, open-label trial that involved stable-angina patients. Along with metoprolol, patients received ivabradine (5 or 7.5 mg, b.i.d.). We investigated the effect of ivabradine on heart rate, angina attacks, nitrate consumption, quality of life (QoL) and tolerability as well as the influence of baseline heart rate.. Heart rate fell by 19.7 ± 11.2 bpm, with an 8-fold decrease in weekly angina attacks (1.7 ± 2.2 to 0.2 ± 0.7) and nitrate consumption (2.4 ± 3.4 to 0.3 ± 0.9). Patient numbers in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I more than doubled (i.e. from 29 to 65%) and QoL improved (the EQ-5D index and visual analog scale scores rose from 0.68 ± 0.27 to 0.84 ± 0.20 and 58.1 ± 18.4 to 72.2 ± 15.5 mm, respectively). The effect of ivabradine was greater in patients with a baseline heart rate ≥70 bpm (mean reduction in heart rate -21.2 ± 10.4 bpm, with a relative reduction in angina attacks and short-acting nitrate consumption of 87.1 and 87.2%, respectively).. Ivabradine combined with metoprolol safely and effectively reduces heart rate, angina attacks and nitrate use, and improves QoL in stable-angina patients.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Metoprolol; Middle Aged; Nitrates; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE) may be associated with stable or unstable coronary events despite the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis. Impaired coronary flow dynamics and myocardial perfusion have been demonstrated in stable patients with ectatic coronary arteries. We aimed to assess whether epicardial flow and tissue-level perfusion would be improved by diltiazem in myocardial regions subtended by the ectatic coronary arteries in patients with isolated CAE. A total of 60 patients with isolated CAE were identified of 9,780 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography. Patients were randomized to 5 mg of intracoronary diltiazem or saline. Coronary blood flow of the microvascular network was assessed using myocardial blush grade (MBG) technique. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and TIMI frame count (TFC) were used to assess epicardial coronary flow. MBG (from 2.4 to 2.6, p = 0.02), TIMI flow grades (from 2.4 to 2.8, p <0.001), and TFC (from 35 to 26, p <0.001) were significantly improved after diltiazem, whereas no significant change was noticed after saline (from 2.4 to 2.4, p = 0.86 for MBG; from 2.3 to 2.3, p = 0.71 for TIMI flow grade; and from 35 to 33, p = 0.43 for TFC). Diltiazem provided amelioration of the altered coronary flow dynamics, which was suggested as the pathophysiological influence of CAE. In conclusion, the favorable effects of the diltiazem on myocardial perfusion were observed at both epicardial and tissue levels.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Circulation; Dilatation, Pathologic; Diltiazem; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Reperfusion; Pericardium; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Different classes of glucose-lowering medications have been associated with varying risks of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, but their effect on angina is unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the association of different glucose-lowering medication classes with angina frequency and nitroglycerin (NTG) use.. We performed a secondary, observational analysis of the TERISA multinational trial, which evaluated the antianginal effect of ranolazine versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, documented coronary disease, and a 3-month history of stable angina. Patients recorded angina and NTG use in a daily dairy for 3 weeks prior to randomization, to establish their baseline angina burden for the trial. We then examined the association of different glucose-lowering medication classes with baseline angina and NTG use using multivariable linear regression.. Among 952 patients enrolled, 494 were taking metformin, 504 taking a sulfonylurea, 186 taking insulin, 29 taking DPP-4 inhibitors, 22 taking other glucose-lowering medications, and 68 were diet-controlled only. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, patients taking versus not taking sulfonylureas had 1.02 more episodes of angina and used 0.93 more doses of NTG per week (P = .002 and .011, respectively). The weekly angina burden or NTG use was not different for those taking versus not taking metformin (P > .7 for both). Patients taking versus not taking insulin had 0.83 more episodes of angina and used 1.40 more NTG doses per week, increases evident only in those taking insulin without concomitant metformin (Pinteraction < .05 for both).. Different classes of glucose-lowering medications were associated with varying angina burden in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary disease. Patients taking sulfonylureas or insulin had more angina and used more NTG, while metformin was not associated with angina burden. Given the increasing prevalence of glucose abnormalities in patients with coronary disease, a better understanding of the relationship between glucose-lowering medications and angina is needed.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Ranolazine; Retrospective Studies

Chronic stable angina is a leading cause of death worldwide. Danhong injection, a complementary alternative medicine for chronic stable angina, has been demonstrated to be effective in numerous studies and is widely prescribed to patients. However, the methodological quality of most prior studies was found to be, in general, low. Therefore, we designed this randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Danhong injection to treat chronic stable angina.. This is a randomized multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive clinical trial. A total of 870 patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned into either the Danhong injection or the placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. Participants will then undergo a 2-week treatment regimen and a 76-day follow-up period. Because this is an adaptive trial, two interim analyses are prospectively planned. These will be performed after one-third and two-thirds of the patients, respectively, have completed the trial. Based on the results of these interim analyses, a data monitoring committee will determine how to modify aspects of the study without undermining the validity and integrity of the trial. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who show a clinically significant change, which is defined as at least a 20-point improvement in angina frequency score on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, which will be administered on day 30. Other secondary efficacy and safety outcomes will also be assessed.. This trial will provide high-quality evidence regarding the use of Danhong injection to treat chronic stable angina.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01681316 .

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; China; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Ivabradine has opened up new possibilities for treating stable angina and chronic heart failure by lowering heart rate. Ivabradine lowers heart rate by selectively inhibiting the I f current in the sinoatrial node. This study aimed to determine whether the decrease in heart rate achieved with ivabradine was accompanied by hemodynamic changes that might lead to an enhancement of endothelial function.. Thirty patients with stable angina pectoris were included in the study. Ivabradine (5 mg bid) was added to the recommended standard treatment. Endothelial function was assessed at baseline and after 3 months of ivabradine therapy, with an Endo-PAT 2000 device (Itamar Medical, Israel). This device was recently developed for the noninvasive assessment for endothelial dysfunction. We evaluated reactive hyperemia index (RHI), which reflects endothelial function, and augmentation index (AI), which provides an indication of arterial stiffness.. The study population consisted of 25 (83.3%) men and five (16.7%) women. The mean age of the patients was 65.4 ± 6.7 years. Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients had a history of myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), 23 (76.6%) had undergone revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft), 16 (53.3%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 29 (96.6%) had arterial hypertension. The mean resting heart rate decreased significantly, from 77 ± 7 bpm at the start of the study to 65 ± 6 bpm after treatment (P < 0.0001). Endothelial function was found to have improved significantly after 3 months of ivabradine therapy. Mean RHI before treatment was 1.54 ± 0.30, suggesting probable endothelial dysfunction, whereas mean RHI at the end of the study was 1.83 ± 0.36 (P < 0.0001). AI also improved significantly on treatment, from 21 ± 20% to 10 ± 21% (P < 0.0001).. The addition of ivabradine to the treatment regimen of patients with stable angina pectoris both lowered heart rate and improved endothelial function. However, broader, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Sinoatrial Node

Long-term nitrate treatment of stable angina is associated with side effects that can interfere with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and medication adherence. The aim of the present study was to compare HRQoL and adherence to treatment in patients with stable angina undergoing nitrate withdrawal or maintenance.. This study is a randomized clinical trial. Patients were allocated to an intervention group (nitrate withdrawal followed by introduction of placebo) or a control group (nitrate maintenance). The assessments were made at baseline and 30 and 120 days using the Short Form Health Survey and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Treatment adherence was measured on the basis of the Morisky scale and pill count.. A total of 105 patients with stable angina were randomized for replacement of nitrate with placebo (n=51) and for maintenance of treatment with nitrate (n=54). After 4 months, Short Form Health Survey scores increased for bodily pain (P=0.005) and general health (P=0.004) in the nitrate maintenance group. Decreased Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores were also noted for physical limitations (P=0.039) and angina frequency (P=0.011) in the nitrate maintenance group. However, the effect size was small (≤0.44) when the intervention and control groups were compared. At the end of the study, adherence was significantly higher in the placebo group (P=0.041), but no difference was detected between the groups with the pill count method.. HRQoL was similar in patients with stable angina using nitrate regularly as compared with patients undergoing nitrate withdrawal. However, adherence to treatment was lower in nitrate users according to the Morisky scale.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Nitrates; Pain; Quality of Life; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time; Treatment Outcome

Clinical trials have proven the anti-anginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of the pacemaker current inhibitor ivabradine in combination with beta-blockers in patients with stable angina pectoris (AP). This retrospective subgroup analysis of the ADDITIONS study evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine combined with beta-blockers, and its effects on angina symptoms and quality of life in elderly patients ≥ 75 years in everyday practice.. In the non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, open-label ADDITIONS study 2330 patients with stable AP of different age groups were treated with a flexible dose of ivabradine twice daily in addition to beta-blockers for 4 months. Heart rate (HR), number of angina attacks, nitrate consumption, tolerance, and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated. A subgroup analysis was performed, focusing on 479 patients (21%) ≥ 75 years.. In these 479 patients ≥ 75 years ivabradine (mean dose 11.61 ± 3.18 mg per day) after 4 months of treatment reduced HR by 19.2 ± 11.6 bpm to 65.4 ± 8.3 bpm. The average number of angina attacks per week was decreased by 1.6 ± 1.8 to 0.4 ± 1.3 and the average consumption of short-acting nitrates per week was reduced by 2.2 ± 3.2 to 0.6 ± 1.8 units (both p < 0.0001). There was a marked shift in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grade distribution with most patients (57%) now classified as CCS grade I, and 42% as CCS grades II and III. This was accompanied by an improvement in EQ-5D QoL index to 0.75 ± 0.22 (p < 0.0001). Tolerability of ivabradine treatment was rated by the physicians as “very good/good” for 72%/28% of elderly patients.. In daily clinical practice, addition of ivabradine to beta-blockers was effective in reducing HR, angina attacks and nitrate consumption in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with stable angina pectoris. In addition, a marked improvement of CCS symptom scores and QoL was demonstrated. Treatment was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Nitrates; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies

Stable angina pectoris is experienced as trans-sternal or retro-sternal pressure or pain that may radiate to the left arm, neck or back. Although available evidence relating to its effectiveness and mechanism are weak, traditional Chinese medicine is used as an alternative therapy for stable angina pectoris. We report a protocol of a randomized controlled trial using traditional Chinese medicine to investigate the effectiveness, mechanism and safety for patients with stable angina pectoris.. This is a north-east Chinese, multi-center, multi-blinded, placebo-controlled and superiority randomized trail. A total of 240 patients with stable angina pectoris will be randomly assigned to three groups: two treatment groups and a control group. The treatment groups will receive Chinese herbal medicine consisting of Yi-Qi-Jian-Pi and Qu-Tan-Hua-Zhuo granule and Yi-Qi-Jian-Pi and Qu-Tan-Hua-Yu granule, respectively, and conventional medicine. The control group will receive placebo medicine in addition to conventional medicine. All 3 groups will undergo a 12-week treatment and 2-week follow-up. Four visits in sum will be scheduled for each subject: 1 visit each in week 0, week 4, week 12 and week 14. The primary outcomes include: the frequency of angina pectoris attack; the dosage of nitroglycerin; body limited dimension of Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes include: except for the body limited dimension of SAQ, traditional Chinese medicine pattern questionnaire and so on. Therapeutic mechanism outcomes, safety outcomes and endpoint outcomes will be also assessed.. The primary aim of this trial is to develop a standard protocol to utilize high-quality EBM evidence for assessing the effectiveness and safety of SAP via TCM pattern differentiation as well as exploring the efficacy mechanism and regulation with the molecular biology and systems biology.. ChiCTR-TRC-13003608, registered 18 June 2013.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; China; Clinical Protocols; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Nitroglycerin; Research Design; Surveys and Questionnaires; Systems Biology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents

A growing population of patients lives with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to coronary revascularization and with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy. Percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus is an emerging treatment for myocardial ischemia that increases coronary sinus pressure to promote a transcollateral redistribution of coronary artery in-flow from nonischemic to ischemic subendocardial territories. A first-in-man study has demonstrated that the percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can be performed safely in such patients. The COSIRA trial seeks to assess whether a percutaneous reduction of the coronary sinus can improve the symptoms of refractory angina in patients with limited revascularization options.. The COSIRA trial is a phase II double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized parallel trial comparing the percutaneously implanted coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc, Richmond, BC, Canada) to a sham implantation in 124 patients enrolled in Canada, Belgium, England, Scotland, Sweden and Denmark. All patients need to have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina despite optimal medical therapy, with evidence of reversible ischemia related to disease in the left coronary artery, and a left ventricular ejection fraction >25%. Participants experiencing an improvement in their angina ≥2 CCS classes six months after the randomization will meet the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objective of this trial is to test whether coronary sinus Reducer implantation will improve left ventricular ischemia, as measured by the improvement in dobutamine echocardiogram wall motion score index and in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression from baseline to six-month post-implantation.. Based on previous observations, the COSIRA is expected to provide a significant positive result or an informative null result upon which rational development decisions can be based. Patient safety is a central concern and extensive monitoring should allow an appropriate investigation of the safety related to the coronary sinus Reducer.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT01205893.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Canada; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiac Catheters; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Sinus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Echocardiography, Stress; Equipment Design; Europe; Humans; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Stroke Volume; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

This first-in-human multicenter study sought to examine prospectively the safety and efficacy of a new, cobalt chromium thin-strut, coronary absorbable polymer-coated, sirolimus-eluting stent.. Bioabsorbable polymers on drug-eluting stents may lower the long-term risks of inflammation, delayed healing, and adverse events.. We enrolled patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease with stable or unstable angina pectoris and >50% diameter stenosis, amenable to coverage with a ≤23-mm long stent in a vessel 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation. Patients, in groups of 10, underwent repeat angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography at 4, 6, or 8 months, and all patients were seen or contacted at 18 months of follow-up.. The median (range) in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was 0.03 mm (-0.22 to 0.21 mm), 0.10 mm (-0.03 to 1.2 mm), and 0.08 mm (-0.01 to 0.28 mm), at 4, 6, and 8 months, respectively. At 18 months, the median in-stent LLL was 0.08 mm (-0.30 to 0.46 mm). On optical coherence tomography, the proportion of uncovered stent struts decreased from a median of 7.3% (range 0.4% to 46.3%) at 4 months to 0% (range: 0% to 3.4%) at 18 months. The percentage of neointimal volume obstruction by intravascular ultrasound increased from a median of 5.3% to 9.1% between 4 and 6 months and remained nearly unchanged thereafter through 18 months of follow-up. The only recorded major adverse cardiac event was a myocardial infarction.. At 18 months of follow-up, this absorbable polymer-coated, cobalt chromium sirolimus-eluting stent was associated with a low and stable in-stent LLL, complete strut coverage, and no stent thrombosis. (First-In-Human Trial of the MiStent Drug-Eluting Stent [DES] in Coronary Artery Disease [DESSOLVE-I]; NCT01247428).

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Australia; Belgium; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; New Zealand; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The paper contains results of assessment of clinical efficacy and safety of coenzyme Q10 in patients with ischemic heart disease. Coenzyme Q10 (60 mg/day for 8 weeks) added to basic treatment of patients with stable class II-III angina significantly improved clinical status of these patients without clinically significant side effects.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angina, Stable; Behavioral Symptoms; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Monitoring; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Symptom Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Ubiquinone; Vitamins

To assess the efficacy of various doses of Mildronate in combination with standard therapy for the exercise tolerance of patients with stable angina pectoris. The primary efficacy variable was the change in exercise time in bicycle ergometry from the baseline to 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were the changes in maximum achieved load and time to the onset of angina from the baseline to week 12.. A total of 512 patients with chronic coronary heart disease who had ischemia as the limiting factor in the exercise test from 72 study centers in 4 countries were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled phase 2 study. The patients were assigned to either 4 groups receiving standard therapy plus Mildronate at different daily doses or 1 group receiving standard therapy plus placebo.. The mean change in the total exercise time in the mildronate 100 mg and mildronate 300 mg groups was -2.12±108.45 and 11.48±62.03 seconds, respectively. The mean change for the placebo group was -7.10±81.78 seconds. The difference between Mildronate 100 mg and 300 mg and placebo groups was not significant. Patients in the Mildronate 1000 mg group showed a remarkable increase in the mean change in the total exercise time (35.18±53.29 seconds, P=0.002). Mildronate at a dose of 3000 mg caused a smaller increase as compared with a dose of 1000 mg. Similar changes in the secondary end parameters were observed.. The most effective dose of Mildronate in combination with standard therapy was found to be 500 mg twice a day.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Methylhydrazines; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome; Trimetazidine; Vasodilator Agents

In the Netherlands, the burden of coronary artery disease is higher than that of any other disease. The healthcare costs amount to approximately 2.3 billion per year. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) reduces mortality and prevents myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina pectoris (AP). In patients with stable AP without a left main coronary artery stenosis or heart failure, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not reduce mortality, nor does it prevent myocardial infarction. The effect on AP is questionable. Improvement of treatment of stable AP can be achieved using intensive CVRM and targeted anti-anginal medication and only if optimal medical therapy (OMT) is not sufficient, a PCI. Clear communication and sharing of tasks between general practitioners and cardiologists in the form of network medicine is necessary, making use of multidisciplinary guidelines and unambiguous, jointly applied quality indicators. Financing of the treatment trajectory for stable AP should promote this integral approach.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina, Stable; Attitude of Health Personnel; Cardiologists; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Clinical Competence; Clinical Decision-Making; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Elderly, frail patients are often excluded from clinical trials so there is lack of data regarding optimal management when they present with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate an unselected elderly population with CAD for the occurrence of frailty, and its association with quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes.. Consecutive patients aged ≥80 years presenting with CAD were prospectively assessed for frailty (Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Edmonton frailty scale (EFS)), QoL (Short form survey (SF-12)) and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)). Patients were re-assessed at 4 months to determine any change in frailty and QoL status as well as the clinical outcome.. One hundred fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic CAD were recruited in the study. The mean age was 83.7±3.2 years, 99 (66.0%) were men. The clinical presentation was stable angina in 68 (45.3%), the remainder admitted with an acute coronary syndrome including 21 (14.0%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Frailty was present in 28% and 26% by FFP and EFS, respectively, and was associated with a significantly higher CCI (7.5±2.4 in frail, 6.2±2.2 in prefrail, 5.9±1.6 in those without frailty, p=0.005). FFP was significantly related to the physical composite score for QoL, while EFS was significantly related to the mental composite score for QoL (p=0.003). Treatment was determined by the cardiologist: percutaneous coronary intervention in 51 (34%), coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 15 (10%) and medical therapy in 84 (56%). At 4 months, 14 (9.3%) had died. Frail participants had the lowest survival. Cardiovascular symptom status and the mental composite score of QoL significantly improved (52.7±11.5 at baseline vs 55.1±10.6 at follow-up, p=0.04). However, overall frailty status did not significantly change, nor the physical health composite score of QoL (37.2±11.0 at baseline vs 38.5±11.3 at follow-up, p=0.27).. In patients referred to hospital with CAD, frailty is associated with impaired QoL and a high coexistence of comorbidities. Following cardiac treatment, patients had improvement in cardiovascular symptoms and mental component of QoL.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Frail Elderly; Frailty; Geriatric Assessment; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes mellitus is a risk for increased incidence of adverse clinical events after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the difference in the incidence of adverse clinical events according to stent type in patients with diabetes remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with the biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) and the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) among patients with diabetes.. Among 631 lesions in 510 consecutive patients treated with either BP-SES or DP-EES, 165 lesions in 141 patients with diabetes mellitus and stable angina pectoris were identified and classified into the BP-SES group (48 lesions in 44 patients) and the DP-EES group (117 lesions in 100 patients). The incidence of adverse clinical events after stent implantation was compared between the 2 groups.. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of conventional risk factors, lesion characteristics, and procedural characteristics between the 2 groups. During median 386 [334-472] days follow-up, the incidence of target lesion revascularization (11.4 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003) and device-oriented clinical endpoint (13.6 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.035) in the BP-SES group was significantly greater than that in the DP-EES group. A univariate model demonstrated that the BP-SES usage was significantly associated with the higher incidence of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio, 6.686; 95% confidence interval, 1.234-36.217; p = 0.028).. BP-SES was associated with the greater incidence of TLR than the DP-EES in patients with diabetes mellitus. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are required to confirm the present results.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The territory of the right coronary artery (RCA) is smaller than that of the left anterior descending artery. Previous studies have reported conflicting results when considering whether stable RCA-chronic total occlusion (CTO) should be reopened. The coexistence of diabetic and coronary artery diseases represents a severe situation. Therefore, we aimed to determine if stable RCA-CTO in diabetic patients was necessary to be reopened. To our knowledge, no studies have focused on this topic to date.. We enrolled diabetic patients with RCA-CTO who had clinical presentations of symptomatic stable angina or silent ischemia. RCA-CTO was treated with either successful revascularization (the CTO-SR group) or medical therapy (the CTO-MT group). The primary endpoint was all-cause death. Both Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were used. Sensitivity analysis was performed based on subgroup populations and relevant baseline variables.. A total of 943 patients were included: 443 (46.98%) patients in the CTO-MT group and 500 (53.02%) patients in the CTO-SR group. After a mid-term follow-up (CTO-SR: 48 months; CTO-MT: 42 months), we found that CTO-SR was superior to CTO-MT in terms of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] [model 1]: 0.429, 95% conference interval [CI] 0.269-0.682; adjusted HR [model 2]: 0.445, 95% CI 0.278-0.714). The superiority of CTO-SR was consistent for cardiac death, possible/definite cardiac death, repeat revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and repeat nonfatal myocardial infarction. Subgroup analysis confirmed the mortality benefit of CTO-SR by percutaneous coronary intervention (the successful CTO-PCI subgroup, 309 patients in total). While CTO-SR by coronary artery bypass grafting (the CTO-CABG subgroup, 191 patients in total) offered patients more benefit from repeat revascularization and TVR than that offered by successful CTO-PCI.. For stable RCA-CTO patients with diabetes, successful revascularization offered patients more clinical benefits than medical therapy. CTO-CABG might be a more recommended way to accomplish revascularization. Trial registration This study was not registered in an open access database.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Occlusion; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This drug utilization study of ivabradine evaluated prescriber compliance with the new risk minimization measures (RMMs), communicated starting 2014 following preliminary results from the SIGNIFY study.. This was a multinational (five European countries) chart review study with two study periods: pre-RMM and post-RMM. Patients initiating ivabradine for chronic stable angina pectoris in routine clinical practice were identified across general practitioners and specialists. The primary outcome analysis evaluated the compliance with the new RMMs, ie, use in patients with a heart rate greater than or equal to 70 bpm at initiation, no doses higher than those recommended in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) at initiation and during 6 months of follow-up, and no concomitant use of verapamil or diltiazem.. Overall, 711 and 506 eligible patients were included in the pre-RMM and post-RMM periods, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed ivabradine according to the new RMMs increased significantly in the post-RMM period (70.6% and 78.4% in the pre- and post-RMM periods respectively; P value = .0035). The compliance to RMMs increased for all the criteria assessed independently: the proportions of patients with (a) heart rate ≥ 70 bpm at initiation (79.4% and 85.2%, respectively; P value = .0141), (b) no dose higher than the SmPC doses at initiation and during follow-up (92.8% and 94.1%, respectively; P value = .3957), and (c) no concomitance with verapamil or diltiazem (96.1% and 99.2%, respectively; P value = .0007).. The RMMs for ivabradine were well implemented across the five participating European countries confirming a favorable benefit-risk balance of ivabradine in chronic stable angina pectoris.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cohort Studies; Drug Utilization; Europe; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Management; Young Adult

The goal evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment with the new TMZ OD dosage form in different regions of the Russian Federation and regional differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease included in the observation, the nature of their therapy, the presence and degree of correction of modifiable risk factors in real clinical practice.. Used database research ODA (Evaluation of the effectiveness and therapeutic response to Preductal OD 80 mg in everyday practical use for the treatment of stable angina), which was conducted in 56 cities of the Russian Federation. The analysis was carried out in the Central, North-West, Volga districts and regions united by the territorial principle - Southern + North Caucasian + Crimea + Sevastopol and Ural + Siberian + Far Eastern.. By region, there were no differences in the ratio of men and women included in the observation, the number of smoking patients (about 15%), overweight (about 80% of patients), arterial hypertension (exceeding 85%),dyslipidemia (over 90%), and atrial fibrillation (met at each 8-10 included patient). The proportion of patients older than 65 years was greater in the Central, North-West and Ural regions. Unfavorable heredity in coronary artery disease is more common in the Southern, Central and Ural regions. More than 2/3 of the patients had low physical activity, and in the South - their number reached ¾ of all included in the observation. The largest number of patients with diabetes was in the Central and North-West regions (every fourth patient), in the Ural region every fifth. The lowest frequency of statin prescribing was in the Volga region. The smallest number of those receiving RAS inhibitors was in the North-West, Ural and South regions. Beta blockers took more than 80% of patients. Only 35% of patients had a target systolic blood pressure. The smallest proportion of people with target blood pressure values was in the NorthWest and South regions. Adding TMZ OD to therapy or replacing previous therapy with trimetazidine on TMZ OD in all regions resulted in a significant (p <0.001) decrease in the incidence of angina attacks by as early as 1 month of therapy and the antianginal effect increased by the third month of treatment. By the third month of treatment, the average frequency of angina attacks was the lowest in the North-Western and Ural regions (significantly lower than even in the Central region) and remained higher only in the Volga region compared to the Central, North-Western and Ural regions. During follow-up, treatment compliance increased significantly in all regions.. The fight against major risk factors remains insufficient and efforts should be made to change the situation in all regions of the Russian Federation. The inclusion of trimetazidine in therapy in the new TMZ OD dosage form allows to obtain a pronounced antianginal effect and increase adherence to therapy. Low adherence can be overcome by careful observation and closer contact between doctors and patients.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Russia; Trimetazidine; Vasodilator Agents

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chest Pain; Coronary Angiography; Humans; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Primary Health Care; Referral and Consultation

Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) is reported to be associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes. This study compared the rates of PMI following treatment of de novo coronary lesions using either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) or a newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES).. We compared the incidence of PMI in propensity-matched patients with stable angina pectoris and single-vessel de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a PCB or newer-generation DES. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics.. After propensity matching, the study cohort included 108 patients (PCB: n=54 and DES: n=54). The peak mean values of creatine kinase-myocardial band (13.3±26.3 vs. 2.2±2.8 ng/ml, P=0.003) and high-sensitive troponin T (0.62±1.38 vs. 0.09±0.19 ng/ml, P=0.007) were significantly higher in the DES group compared with the PCB group. The incidence of PMI was significantly higher in the DES group [DES: 11 (20.4%) vs. PCB: one (1.9%); P=0.002]. Total occlusion of the side-branch occurred in two patients treated with DES, but no patients treated with PCB. Treatment with a newer-generation DES was found to be an independent predictor of PMI on multivariable analyses.. In patients with stable angina using a PCB, compared with deployment of a newer-generation DES, is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of PMI.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Cardiac Catheters; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Databases, Factual; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Troponin T

Trimetazidine (TMZ) has been shown to reduce angina symptoms and to increase exercise capacity in randomized clinical trials, but more extensive data would be useful to assess its effects in real-world clinical practice and in patients with different durations of disease.. CHOICE-2 was a Russian, multicenter, 6-month, open-label, prospective observational study that assessed the effect of adding TMZ modified release 35 mg bid to antianginal treatment in a real-world setting. The present analysis of CHOICE-2 results explored the effects of adding TMZ to background antianginal therapies with regard to the duration of stable angina.. A total of 741 patients with known durations of disease were divided into four groups according to stable angina pectoris (AP) duration, ranging from less than 1 year to more than 9 years. Addition of TMZ led to a significant decrease in the frequency of angina attacks and in the use of short-acting nitrates in all groups. In patients with recently diagnosed angina (AP duration < 1 year), the average number of angina attacks per week decreased significantly from 3.75 ± 4.63 to 0.67 ± 1.51 and in those with advanced disease (AP duration > 9 years) from 5.63 ± 5.24 to 1.32 ± 2.07. Angina-free walking distance also improved significantly. Addition of TMZ also improved patient well-being. Results were achieved rapidly (within 2 weeks), were maintained over 6 months, and were obtained in all patient groups regardless of angina duration.. TMZ added to other antianginal therapies proved to be effective for reducing angina attacks and short-acting nitrate use, increasing angina-free walking distance, and improving patient well-being in a real-life setting, irrespective of angina duration, including patients with recently diagnosed angina. This provides an opportunity for intensification of treatment early on in the disease process, with the aim of decreasing angina burden and improving patient quality of life.. Servier.. ISRCTN identifier ISRCTN65209863. Plain language summary available for this article.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrates; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Research Design; Russia; Time Factors; Trimetazidine; Vasodilator Agents; Walk Test

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with a high burden of angina. Ranolazine has been shown to reduce angina frequency versus placebo in patients with T2D and stable angina. We sought to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ranolazine when added to standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone in patients with T2D and stable, but symptomatic coronary disease despite treatment with 1-2 antianginals.. A Markov model was developed and evaluated using cohort simulation. The model utilized a US societal perspective, 1-month cycle length and 1-year time horizon and was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ranolazine versus SoC. Patients entered the model in 1 of 4 angina frequency health states based on baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency scores (100 = no; 61-99 = monthly; 31-60 = weekly; 0-30 = daily) and could transition between health states (first cycle only) or to death (any cycle) based on probabilities derived from the Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects with Chronic Stable Angina trial.. Our model estimated patients treated with ranolazine lived a mean of 0.728 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $16,654. Those not receiving ranolazine lived a mean of 0.702 QALYs and incurred costs of $15,476. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the addition of ranolazine to SoC was $45,308/QALY. Short Form-36 data suggest improvements in patients' bodily pain drove the gain in QALYs associated with ranolazine (2.73 versus 3.96, p = 0.01).. Our model suggests the addition of ranolazine to SoC is likely cost-effective from a US societal perspective for the treatment of patients with T2D and stable, symptomatic coronary disease despite treatment with 1-2 antianginals.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Ranolazine

Real-world outcomes in patients with chronic stable angina treated with ranolazine and other antianginal medications as second- or third-line therapy are limited. In a historical cohort study of veterans with chronic stable angina, we compared time with coronary revascularization procedures, hospitalizations, and 1-year healthcare costs between new-users of ranolazine versus conventional antianginals (i.e., calcium channel blockers, β blockers, or long-acting nitrates) as second- or third-line. Weighted regression models calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) at up to 8-year follow-up, and adjusted incremental costs in the first year. Weighted groups comprised 4,699 ranolazine users and 31,815 conventional antianginal users. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occurred more often in ranolazine users compared with conventional antianginal users (HR 1.16; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.08 to 1.25, p <0.001), and coronary artery bypass grafting occurred less often (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.00, p <0.046). All-cause and atrial fibrillation (AF) hospitalizations were less common with ranolazine users compared with conventional users (all-cause: HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99, p <0.010; AF:HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82, p <0.001), and acute coronary syndrome was more common (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.27, p <0.042). Adjusted 1-year costs were $24,517 in ranolazine users and $24,798 in conventional users (difference, $-280; 95% CI $-1,742 to $1,181, p = 0.71). In conclusion, ranolazine users had lower rates of coronary artery bypass grafting and all-cause and AF hospitalizations, but higher rates of percutaneous coronary intervention and hospitalizations due to acute coronary syndrome compared with conventional antianginal users. Healthcare costs were similar between ranolazine and conventional antianginal users.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Ranolazine; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Veterans

Patients with angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction, without evidence of structural or epicardial coronary disease (Type I CMVD) remain without evidence based treatment options. Previous work has demonstrated that ranolazine can improve angina frequency and stability among patients with Type 1 CMVD; however, the mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this pilot project was to assess the impact of ranolazine on Type I CMVD as measured using an invasive tool to measure global resistance (index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)).. Patients with Type 1 CMVD diagnosed using IMR were enrolled and treated with ranolazine 1000mg BID. Coronary angiography and IMR were performed at baseline and on treatment after four weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in IMR pre- and post-treatment. Secondary outcome measures, improvement in angina and activity level, were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Metabolic equivalent for Task (MET) scores.. A total of 7 patient were enrolled and completed the study. Mean age was 57.6±7.5, 43% were female and 43% were Hispanic. Mean baseline IMR was 37.25±16.27 which decreased to 19.48±5.69 (p=0.02; (-48% Δ) after treatment with ranolazine. Four of the five SAQ domains improved on treatment with significant improvement in physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.04), angina stability (p=0.05) and disease perception (p=0.001). Non-significant improvements in activity were also seen in both the DASI and MET scores.. Among patients with Type 1 CMVD, our pilot data suggest favorable changes in IMR, anginal symptoms and activity status with ranolazine treatment. These findings support further evaluation of the effects of ranolazine on microcirculatory function and angina symptoms in a larger cohort of patients with Type 1 CMVD.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ranolazine; Treatment Outcome

Increase in heart rate triggers most ischemic episodes due to disbalance between myocardial oxygen delivery and consumption. Furthermore, increased heart rate is a modifiable risk factor in patients with chronic heart failure. Ivabradine reduces heart rate by selectively inhibiting the If current of sinoatrial node cells. Recent studies have shown that ivabradine may reduce myocardial ischaemia and its consequences not only through heart rate reduction, but also because of additional pleiotropic effects. This review summarizes last findings that demonstrate variety of ivabradine actions on coronary blood flow and left ventricular function in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemodynamics; Humans; Ivabradine; Myocardial Ischemia; Sinoatrial Node

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiovascular Agents; Compassionate Use Trials; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Sinus; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Preliminary Data; Recovery of Function; Treatment Outcome

Although coronary revascularization procedures are widely performed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), angina is often reported, even after such procedures. This study evaluated the antianginal efficacy and effect of ivabradine treatment on quality of life (QOL) in patients with CAD and history of coronary revascularization. This is a post hoc analysis (926 post-revascularization patients) of a prospective, noninterventional study, which included 2403 patients with CAD and stable angina. The data were recorded at baseline, at 1 month and 4 months after inclusion. After ivabradine administration, mean number of anginal events decreased from 2.2 ± 2.3 (median: 2.0, minimum: 0.0, maximum: 21.0, range: 21.0) to 0.3 ± 0.6 (median: 0.0, minimum: 0.0, maximum: 7.0, range: 7.0) times/week (P < .001), while nitroglycerin consumption decreased from 1.5 ± 2.2 (median: 1.0, minimum: 0.0, maximum: 20.0, range: 20.0) to 0.1 ± 0.4 times/week (median: 0.0, minimum: 0.0, maximum: 5.0, range: 5.0; P < .001). Quality of life improved at study completion compared to baseline (P < .001). Ivabradine addition on top of optimal individualized dose of β-blockers is associated with decreased anginal events and improvement in QOL in patients with stable angina and history of coronary revascularization.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Quality of Life

Limited data are currently available on the performance of everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for treatment of complex coronary lesions representative of daily practice.. This is a prospective, mono-center, single-arm study, reporting data after BVS implantation in patients presenting with stable, unstable angina, or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction caused by de novo stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries. No restrictions were applied to lesion complexity. Procedural results and 12-month clinical outcomes were reported.. A total of 180 patients have been evaluated in the present study, with 249 treated coronary lesions. Device Success per lesion was 99.2%. A total of 119 calcified lesions were treated. Comparable results were observed among severe, moderate and noncalcified lesions in term of %diameter stenosis (%DS) (20.3 ± 10.5%, 17.8 ± 7.7%, 16.8 ± 8.6%; P = 0.112) and acute gain (1.36 ± 0.41 mm, 1.48 ± 0.44 mm, 1.56 ± 0.54 mm; P = 0.109). In bifurcations (54 lesions), side-branch ballooning after main vessel treatment was often performed (33.3%) with low rate of side-branch impairment (9.3%). A total of 29 cases with coronary total occlusions were treated. After BVS implantation %DS was not different from other lesion types (17.2 ± 9.4%, vs. 17.7 ± 8.6%; P = 0.780). At one year, all-cause mortality was reported in three cases. The rate of target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization was 3.3%. The rate of definite scaffold thrombosis was 2.6%.. The implantation of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in an expanded range of coronary lesion types and clinical presentations was observed to be feasible with promising angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Decision-Making; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Everolimus; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vascular Calcification

Primary objectives were to evaluate tolerability, compliance, and perception of ranolazine effectiveness for chronic stable angina in a routine clinical setting. The secondary objective was safety evaluation.. Prospective, multi-centre, observational, study with a 6-month follow-up and study visits at baseline, 3- and 6 months in patients with chronic stable angina. Ranolazine was administered according to the summary of product characteristics and investigator discretion. Data was collected on patient and disease characteristics, concomitant therapy, angina frequency and severity, quality of life (QoL), perception of effectiveness, compliance, and adverse events.. Between July 2010 and July 2012, 189 patients were enrolled at 20 centres. Ranolazine decreased the proportion of patients experiencing angina attacks from 88.4% at baseline to 26.5% at 6 months (p<0.001). Heart rate and blood pressure were not appreciably affected. The proportion of patients without symptoms on normal exertion (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading class I) increased from 22.3% to 75.3% (p<0.001); patients reporting limitations in daily activities decreased from 80.4% to 35.5%. (p<0.001). Patient- and physician-assessed QoL improved (both p<0.001). Therapeutic efficacy was rated "good" or "very good" in 67.7% of cases by physicians, and by 63.5% of the patients. Physicians rated compliance "good" or "very good" in 73.5% of cases. Adverse events were consistent with previous reports, and consisted of 40 events in 24 patients; 12 were serious.. Ranolazine was associated with decreased angina frequency and severity, and improvements in QoL. The benefits provided by ranolazine in controlled clinical trials are maintained in the clinical setting.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Greece; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Ranolazine; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to assess the long-term outcome of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) application in patients with a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of 0.75-0.80.. Scientifically evaluating anatomical structures is vital because structure influences both physiological function and decision-making in moderate coronary lesions, especially for those with an FFR of 0.75-0.80.. Patients (n=128) were divided into three groups based on treatment: the drug control group (n=40), the IVUS-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (n=40) and the IVUS-drug group (n=48). A PCI was performed when a patient had a minimum lumen area less than 4 mm(2) and a plaque burden of 70% or greater. Major adverse clinical events were defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, including PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting, and unstable angina, all of which were also evaluated during follow-up.. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the incidence of major adverse clinical events did not differ between the IVUS-PCI and IVUS-drug groups (5 vs. 6.3%, P=0.810), but the levels in both of these groups significantly decreased compared with the drug control group (5 vs. 22.5%, P=0.024, and 6.5 vs. 22.5%, P=0.026, respectively).. The long-term outcome of the application of IVUS in patients with a grey-zone FFR of 0.75-0.80 was superior to that of patients who were treated only with drugs without IVUS measurement. Patients with a grey-zone FFR should receive an individualized treatment strategy according to their IVUS parameters. Patients with the same FFR values may require different treatment strategies.

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Female; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Compared with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not reduce mortality or myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina. Therefore, PCI should be guided by refractory anginal symptoms and not just lesion characteristics.. We hypothesized that angiographic lesion characteristics and stress test results would have a greater role in the decision to proceed with PCI than would symptom severity.. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization and possible PCI at an academic medical center. Anginal symptoms, optimal medical therapy, antianginal therapy, stress test results, and angiographic lesions (including American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [ACC/AHA] lesion type) were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of medical management among patients not referred for coronary artery bypass surgery.. Of the 207 patients with obstructive lesions amenable to PCI, 163 underwent PCI and 44 were referred to medical therapy. In the multivariable logistic model, the following variables were associated with medical management: advancing age (odds ratio [OR] per 1 year: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.98), chronic kidney disease (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.95), distal location (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.48), and ACC/AHA type C lesion (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.22). There was no association with sex, race, symptoms, optimal medical therapy, maximal antianginal therapy, referral status, or type of interventional cardiologist (academic vs private practice).. For patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for stable angina, the decision to proceed to PCI vs medical management appears to depend largely on patient and angiographic characteristics, but not on symptoms or ischemia. Distal and high-risk lesions (ACC/AHA type C) are more often referred for medical therapy.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Cardiac Catheterization; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Logistic Models; Male; Massachusetts; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Referral and Consultation; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Data on multiple bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) for the treatment of coronary lesions are limited. We compared clinical results after implantation of single or multiple BVS for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease.. We enrolled 236 patients with 311 lesions treated with Absorb BVS. Quantitative coronary angiography before and after scaffold implantation was performed. All lesions were predilated. Absorb was implanted with slow inflation and 81% were postdilated with a high-pressure balloon. Patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months for stable angina pectoris and for 12 months for acute coronary syndrome. Patients were clinically followed for 12 months. Acute gain was 1.39±0.47 mm. Multiple scaffolds per lesion were implanted in 23.8% (N=74/311 lesions). The mean scaffold length was 21 mm for single and 48 mm (range 28-112 mm) for multiple BVS. Periprocedural myocardial infarction (13.5 vs. 4.6%, P<0.013) and target lesion revascularization (6.8 vs. 0.8%; P=0.003) were significantly higher in the multiple-scaffold group compared with the single-scaffold group. There was no definite scaffold thrombosis. (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02162056).. Target lesion revascularization within 12 months and periprocedural myocardial infarction were higher for lesions treated with multiple scaffolds compared with lesions treated with single BVS.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In the prospective, open-label, non-interventional, multicenter RESPONSIfVE study, the effectiveness, response rates and tolerability of ivabradine with or without beta blocker (BB) were evaluated in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (AP) in daily clinical practice.. In patients with AP, ivabradine was given twice daily in flexible doses for 4 months. Resting heart rate (HR), number of angina attacks, short-acting nitrate use, severity of symptoms [by Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score] and tolerability with or without existing BB therapy were documented and analyzed using descriptive statistical methods.. In total, 1250 patients with AP (mean age 66.0 ± 10.9 years, 59.6% male, 31.9% previous myocardial infarction) and an indication for ivabradine were included. Sixty-five percent of all patients received BB. Further concomitant standard medication included aspirin (74.2%), statins (69.3%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (84.2%), diuretics (40.0%), long-acting nitrates (15.7%), and calcium antagonists (21.4%). After 4 months of ivabradine treatment (mean daily dose 11.0 ± 2.7 mg), mean HR was reduced from 82.4 ± 11.8 beats per minute (bpm) to 67.1 ± 8.4 bpm. The average number of angina attacks/week decreased from 1.2 ± 1.9 to 0.1 ± 0.6 and the average use of short-acting nitrates/week from 1.5 ± 2.8 units to 0.2 ± 1.0 units. CCS classification of patients improved from 76% classified in CCS grades II or III and 24% in CCS grade I to 66% classified in CCS grade I and only 35% remaining in CCS grades II or III at study end. Response rate to ivabradine (defined as HR <70 bpm or HR reduction ≥10 bpm) reached 87%. HR reduction, symptomatic improvement and response rates were comparable in patients with or without BB. Adverse drug reactions were reported for 2.2% of patients.. In this prospective study over a four-month period in clinical practice, ivabradine effectively reduced HR, angina attacks, and nitrate consumption in patients with AP with or without concomitant BB therapy. Ivabradine improved CCS scores and achieved a high treatment response rate with good general tolerability.. Servier.. Controlled-trials.com identifier, ISRCTN73861224.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Depression, Chemical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to report on clinical outcomes beyond 1 year of the BVS Expand registry.. Multiple studies have proven feasibility and safety of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California). However, data on medium- to long-term outcomes are limited and available only for simpler lesions.. This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, single-arm study evaluating performance of the BVS in a lesion subset representative of daily clinical practice, including calcified lesions, total occlusions, long lesions, and small vessels. Inclusion criteria were patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, stable/unstable angina, or silent ischemia caused by a de novo stenotic lesion in a native previously untreated coronary artery. Procedural and medium- to long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.. From September 2012 to January 2015, 249 patients with 335 lesions were enrolled. Mean number of scaffolds per patient was 1.79 ± 1.15. Invasive imaging was used in 39%. In 38.1% there were American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification type B2/C lesions. Mean lesion length was 22.16 ± 13.79 mm. Post-procedural acute lumen gain was 1.39 ± 0.59 mm. Median follow-up period was 622 (interquartile range: 376 to 734) days. Using Kaplan-Meier methods, the MACE rate at 18 months was 6.8%. Rates of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 18 months were 1.8%, 5.2%, and 4.0%, respectively. Definite scaffold thrombosis rate was 1.9%.. In our study, BVS implantation in a complex patient and lesion subset was associated with an acceptable rate of adverse events in the longer term, whereas no cases of early thrombosis were observed.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Medical treatment is the main clinical strategy for controlling patients with chronic stable angina and improving their quality of life (QoL). Ivabradine treatment on top of metoprolol decreases angina symptoms and improves QoL in patients with stable angina and coronary artery disease (CAD). This is a post hoc analysis (636 CAD patients given ivabradine/metoprolol free combination) of a prospective, noninterventional study that included 2403 patients with CAD and stable angina. Data were recorded at baseline at 1 and 4 months after inclusion. Patient QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. From baseline to study completion; ivabradine administration on top of metoprolol decreased heart rate (HR) from 80.8 ± 9.6 to 64.2 ± 6.2 bpm (P < 0.001). Mean number of angina attacks decreased from 2.0 ± 2.0/wk to 0.2 ± 0.6/wk (P < 0.001), whereas nitroglycerin consumption decreased from 1.4 ± 1.9 times/wk to 0.1 ± 0.4 times/wk (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class III to IV decreased from 15.4% to 1.9% (P < 0.001). The improvement of symptoms and angina class led to a significant 14.7-point increase in EQ-5D questionnaire score (P < 0.001). Patients with increased HR showed greater improvement (P = 0.001). Adherence to treatment during the entire trial was high (98%). Ivabradine combined with metoprolol significantly decreased angina symptoms and use of nitroglycerin in patients with stable angina and CAD, leading to improved QoL. The benefits observed with this combination explain the high rate of adherence to treatment.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channels; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Metoprolol; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

to demonstrate impact of addition of nicorandil to standard treatment in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) on clinical manifestations of the disease and safety of conducted therapy.. We included in this double-blind placebo controlled study with parallel groups 120 patients with verified IHD and stable effort angina. During the entire study all patients received metoprolol (100 mg/day). Patients of main group were given nicorandil (10 mg twice a day for 2 weeks and 20 mg twice a day thereafter); patients of control group were given placebo. Study duration was 6 weeks.. Addition of nicorandil was associated with significant reduction of number of anginal attacks both compared with control period and addition of placebo. Consumption of short acting nitrates significantly decreased on both nicorandil doses compared with control period. Adverse events were registered in 10 of 61 and 7 of 59 patients (16.4 and 11.9%) taking nicorandil and placebo, respectively (n.s.). Three patients withdrew from the study because of headache.. Addition of nicorandil to standard therapy in patients with chronic IHD and stable effort angina promoted significant reduction of number of angina attacks. Good tolerability of nicorandil was also demonstrated.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Metoprolol; Middle Aged; Nicorandil; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents

The anti-anginal efficacy of ivabradine is well established. We describe a post hoc analysis in the ADDITIONS database to investigate effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in combination with beta-blocker in patients with angina who have had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. ADDITIONS was a non-interventional, multicenter prospective study including 2,330 patients with stable angina. In addition to beta-blocker, patients were treated with ivabradine in approved dosages for 4 months. We divided the population according to whether they had previously had a PCI or not, and explored the effect of ivabradine on heart rate, number of weekly angina attacks, frequency of nitrate consumption, as well as quality of life (QoL) and tolerability.. Data were available for 2,319 patients, of whom 51.4% had previously had a PCI. There was no difference in the effect of ivabradine on mean heart rate between patients with a previous PCI [64.4 ± 7.6 beats per minute (bpm)] than those without (66.8 ± 8.5 bpm) at 4 months (both P < 0.0001). Similarly, the number of angina attacks decreased from 1.9 ± 2.4 to 0.5 ± 1.5 per week in patients with a previous PCI and 1.5 ± 2.0 to 0.3 ± 1.0 per week in patients without a previous PCI (both P < 0.0001). The frequency of nitrate consumption fell from 2.7 ± 3.7 to 1.0 ± 1.9 per week and 1.8 ± 2.8 to 0.6 ± 1.5 per week (both P < 0.0001) in patients with and without a previous PCI, respectively. There was no difference in the improvements in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class of angina, QoL, and physicians' assessment of effectiveness and tolerability between patients with a previous PCI and those without.. Ivabradine is an effective and well-tolerated anti-anginal treatment in patients with stable angina after PCI. Ivabradine reduced the frequency of weekly angina attacks and nitrate consumption, led to an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class and a substantial improvement in the QoL of stable angina patients.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Canada; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrates; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Everolimus; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

The ratio of revascularization to medical therapy (referred to herein as the revascularization ratio) for the initial treatment of stable ischemic heart disease varies considerably across hospitals. We conducted a comprehensive study to identify patient, physician and hospital factors associated with variations in the revascularization ratio across 18 cardiac centres in the province of Ontario. We also explored whether clinical outcomes differed between hospitals with high, medium and low ratios.. We identified all patients in Ontario who had stable ischemic heart disease documented by index angiography performed between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2011, at any of the 18 cardiac centres in the province. We classified patients by initial treatment strategy (medical therapy or revascularization). Hospitals were classified into equal tertiles based on their revascularization ratio. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patient follow-up was until Dec. 31, 2012. Hierarchical logistic regression models identified predictors of revascularization. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with a time-varying covariate for actual treatment received, were used to evaluate the impact of the revascularization ratio on clinical outcomes.. Variation in revascularization ratios was twofold across the hospitals. Patient factors accounted for 67.4% of the variation in revascularization ratios. Physician and hospital factors were not significantly associated with the variation. Significant patient-level predictors of revascularization were history of smoking, multivessel disease, high-risk findings on noninvasive stress testing and more severe symptoms of angina (v. no symptoms). Treatment at hospitals with a high revascularization ratio was associated with increased mortality compared with treatment at hospitals with a low ratio (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.21).. Most of the variation in revascularization ratios across hospitals was warranted, in that it was driven by patient factors. Nonetheless, the variation was associated with potentially important differences in mortality.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus; Exercise Test; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Income; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Revascularization; Ontario; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Smoking

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angina, Stable; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Discovery; Humans; Nitrates; Ranolazine

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, with coronary heart disease as the major contributor to this related mortality. There is a growing trend in the application of Chinese medicine in clinical practice for the treatment of coronary heart disease. However, there is a lack of knowledge surrounding the pharmacological, toxicological, and biological profiles of Chinese medicine. In this case report, we describe the therapeutic effects of Tongguan capsule in a 40-year-old woman diagnosed with stable angina pectoris. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case documented of the therapeutic effect of Tongguan capsule in the treatment of coronary heart disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Angina, Stable; Capsules; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Comparative studies evaluating traditional versus newer antianginal (AA) medications in chronic stable angina pectoris (CSA) on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and utilization are limited, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Claims data (2008 to 2012) were analyzed using a commercial database. Patients with CSA receiving a β blocker (BB), calcium channel blocker (CCB), long-acting nitrate (LAN), or ranolazine were identified and followed for 12 months after a change in AA therapy. Patients on traditional AA medications were required to have concurrent sublingual nitroglycerin. Therapy change was defined as adding or switching to another traditional AA medication or ranolazine to identify patients whose angina was inadequately controlled with previous therapy. Four groups were identified (BB, CCB, LAN, or ranolazine users) and matched on relevant characteristics. A DM subset was identified. Logistic regression compared revascularization at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days. Negative binomial regression compared all-cause, CV-, and DM-related (in the DM cohort) health care utilization. A total of 8,008 patients were identified with 2,002 patients in each matched group. Majority were men (mean age 66 years). A subset of 3,724 patients with DM (BB, n = 933; CCB, n = 940; LAN, n = 937; and ranolazine, n = 914) resulted from this cohort. Compared to ranolazine in the overall cohort, traditional AA medication exhibited greater odds for revascularization and higher rates in all-cause outpatient, emergency room visits, inpatient length of stay, and CV-related emergency room visits. In the DM cohort, ranolazine demonstrated similar benefits over traditional AA medication. In conclusion, ranolazine use in patients with inadequately controlled chronic angina is associated with less revascularization and all-cause and CV-related health care utilization compared to traditional AA medication.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Resources; Humans; Male; Nitroglycerin; Ranolazine; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vasodilator Agents

Few studies have analyzed the cost of treatment of chronic angina pectoris, especially in European countries.. To determine, using a modeling approach, the cost of care in 2012 for 1year of treatment of patients with stable angina, according to four therapeutic options: optimal medical therapy (OMT); percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stent (PCI-BMS); PCI with drug-eluting stent (PCI-DES); and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).. Six different clinical scenarios that could occur over 1year were defined: clinical success; recurrence of symptoms without hospitalization; myocardial infarction (MI); subsequent revascularization; death from non-cardiac cause; and cardiac death. The probability of a patient being in one of the six clinical scenarios, according to the therapeutic options used, was determined from a literature search. A direct medical cost for each of the therapeutic options was calculated from the perspective of French statutory health insurance.. The annual costs per patient for each strategy, according to their efficacy results, were, in our models, €1567 with OMT, €5908 with PCI-BMS, €6623 with PCI-DES and €16,612 with CABG. These costs were significantly different (P<0.05). A part of these costs was related to management of complications (recurrence of symptoms, MI and death) during the year (between 3% and 38% depending on the therapeutic options studied); this part of the expenditure was lowest with the CABG therapeutic option.. OMT appears to be the least costly option, and, if reasonable from a clinical point of view, might achieve appreciable savings in health expenditure.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Cause of Death; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; France; Health Care Costs; Health Expenditures; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; National Health Programs; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of ranolazine when added to standard-of-care (SoC) antianginals compared with SoC alone in patients with stable coronary disease experiencing ≥3 attacks/week.. An economic model utilising a UK health system perspective, a 1-month cycle-length and a 1-year time horizon.. Patients with stable coronary disease experiencing ≥3 attacks/week starting in 1 of 4 angina frequency health states based on Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (SAQAF) scores (100=no; 61-99=monthly; 31-60=weekly; 0-30=daily angina).. Ranolazine added to SoC or SoC alone. Patients were allowed to transition between SAQAF states (first cycle only) or death (any cycle) based on probabilities derived from the randomised, controlled Efficacy of Ranolazine in Chronic Angina trial and other studies. Patients not responding to ranolazine in month 1 (not improving ≥1 SAQAF health state) discontinued ranolazine and were assumed to behave like SoC patients.. Costs (£2014) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients receiving and not receiving ranolazine.. Ranolazine patients lived a mean of 0.701 QALYs at a cost of £5208. Those not receiving ranolazine lived 0.662 QALYs at a cost of £5318. The addition of ranolazine to SoC was therefore a dominant economic strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was sensitive to ranolazine cost; exceeding £20,000/QALY when ranolazine's cost was >£203/month. Ranolazine remained a dominant strategy when indirect costs were included and mortality rates were assumed to increase with worsening severity of SAQAF health states. Monte Carlo simulation found ranolazine to be a dominant strategy in ∼71% of 10,000 iterations.. Although UK-specific data on ranolazine's efficacy and safety are lacking, our analysis suggest ranolazine added to SoC in patients with weekly or daily angina is likely cost-effective from a UK health system perspective.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ranolazine; Sodium Channel Blockers; Surveys and Questionnaires; United Kingdom

Results of the multicenter open observational program NACHALO (evaluation of therapy in patients with combined coronary artery disease and heart failure as part of daily clinical practice), in which 569 doctors in 58 regions of the Russian Federation participated, were presented. The program included 2751 patients with ischemic heart disease, stable angina complicated by heart failure at the age from 25 to 94 years (mean age 62.6 ± 9.3 years). The follow-up period was 3 months, during which two visits were carried out--after 4 weeks and a final visit--12 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Despite treatment, angina attacks (mean 6.7 6.1 per week), increased blood pressure (average 145.1 ± 20.9/87.2 ± 1.8 mm Hg) and heart rate (average 85.8 ± 9.5 beats/min) were noted in patients before the inclusion in the program. The addition of ivabradine therapy resulted in a significant (p < 0.00001) reduction in heart rate to 73.2 ± 8.7 (at visit 1) and down to 65.2 ± 6.1 beats/min (at visit 2), the number of angina attacks per week to 3.8 (at visit 1) and 1.9 (at visit 2). There were significant (p < 0.00001) positive dynamics of the clinical wellness and the severity of symptoms in patients. Adverse effects that, according to doctors, were associated with the agent, were observed in only 0.15% of cases. Thus, in real clinical practice inhibitor of the if channels ivabradine has been shown to be highly effective in treatment of stable angina in patients with coronary artery disease complicated by heart failure.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channels; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Treatment Outcome

In coronary artery disease (CAD), medical treatment is the main clinical strategy for controlling ischemia and angina symptoms while restoring a satisfactory level of usual activities and improving quality of life (QOL). This study's purpose was to evaluate in CAD patients the antianginal efficacy of 4-month treatment with ivabradine plus a β-blocker and to record patient compliance and the effect of treatment on QOL.. In this noninterventional study, 2403 patients with chronic stable angina were prospectively studied from 245 private cardiology offices. Data were recorded at baseline and at 1 and 4 months after inclusion. Patient quality of life was assessed using the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.. From baseline to study completion, mean heart rate decreased from 81.5 ± 9.7 bpm to 63.9 ± 6.0 bpm (P <-0.001), mean number of anginal attacks decreased from 2.0 ± 2.0 times/wk to 0.2 ± 0.6 times/wk (P < 0.001) and nitroglycerin consumption decreased from 1.4 ± 2.0 times/wk to 0.1 ± 0.4 times/wk (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class I increased from approximately 38% (baseline) to 84% (study completion; P < 0.001). The reduction in anginal attacks, nitroglycerin consumption, and angina score was correlated with reduction in heart rate (P < 0.001). The mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale index increased by 16.1 points (P < 0.001), and compliance with treatment was high throughout the trial (96%).. Ivabradine administration on top of optimal individualized dose of β-blockers is associated with decreased anginal events and with improvement of QOL in CAD patients.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Greece; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Cardiologists' approach to angina in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. Therefore, we analysed data from the national multicentre, observational PULSE study to evaluate the frequency of angina, clinical variables affecting angina frequency and the impact of frequent angina on quality of life (QoL) in outpatients with stable CAD managed by cardiologists in secondary and tertiary health-care centres in Turkey.. Adult outpatients with stable CAD in sinus rhythm were included. Data were collected at a single study visit from 83 centres. Patients were divided into five categories according to angina attack frequency. QoL was measured by the MacNew heart disease health-related QoL Questionnaire. The mean (standard deviation; SD) age of all patients (n = 2661) was 61.2 (10.2) years. Of 2,661 patients, 48.7% had no anginal attacks while 16.5% had minimal, 14.5% occasional, 12.2% regular and 8.1% frequent attacks. Angina attack frequency correlated positively with female sex, heart rate, the severity of angina. Emotional, physical, social, and global scores of QoL tended to decrease across angina attack frequency categories. Short- and long-acting nitrates, ivabradine were significantly more preferred in patients with higher frequency of angina attacks rather than beta blockers and calcium channel blockers.. Insufficient angina control in outpatients with stable CAD requires reassessment of medical approach since it has a negative impact on QoL. The social and economic consequences of this burden should be sought on a national basis.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Benzazepines; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Ivabradine; Male; Middle Aged; Nitroglycerin; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Outpatients; Patient Acuity; Patient Preference; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Secondary Care Centers; Sex Factors; Tertiary Care Centers; Turkey

Topics: Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans

The regional variability of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates may be explained by variations in the medical treatment of stable coronary artery disease. We sought to determine whether greater regional use of antianginal medications in PCI patients is associated with lower regional rates of PCI.. Using CathPCI Registry and Dartmouth Atlas data, we examined patients undergoing elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease from January 1, 2009, through March 31, 2011, and calculated rates of providing ≥ 2 antianginal medicines before PCI. We regressed the hospital referral region rates of PCI per 1000 Medicare enrollees in 2007 on the regions' rates of providing ≥ 2 antianginal medications before PCI. Among 300772 PCI procedures, 32.8%, 48.3%, 16.1%, and 2.8% of patients were on 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 antianginal medications, respectively. The median rate of providing ≥ 2 antianginal medications before PCI was 18.9%. Although substantial variability existed across hospital referral regions in providing ≥ 2 antianginal medications and in rates of PCI from the Dartmouth Atlas, there was no association between the rates of PCI in each hospital referral region and the rates of ≥ 2 antianginal medications before PCI (Spearman ρ, 0.0277; P=0.64).. We found no association between the intensity of antianginal therapy and the use of PCI across hospital referral regions, despite the variability of both. Opportunities likely exist in many regions to increase the use of antianginal therapy before proceeding to elective PCI, and more research is needed to explain observed variations in care.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Referral and Consultation; Registries

The biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents have been proposed as an alternative to durable polymer DES, theoretically improving vessel healing and reducing the need for prolonged double anti platelet therapy (DAPT), however clinical significance of this technology is under debate. Therefore, we sought to compare the clinical outcomes of two Paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) containing different polymer-based eluting matrices.. In this multicenter registry of 392 consecutive patients who underwent PCI between June 2006 and September 2008, we included patients with stable angina or NSTE-ACS displaying at least one significant lesion (>50% diameter stenosis) in native coronary arteries.. Biodegradable polymer PES (BP-PES, LUC Chopin(2) , Balton, Poland) was implanted in 206 patients, whereas durable polymer PES (DP-PES, Taxus, Boston Scientific, USA) was implanted in 186 patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups with the exception of increased diabetes and number of lesions for BP-PES. In risk-unadjusted analysis at 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in TLR (BP-PES: 8.4% vs.. 6%; P = 0.36), TVR (BP-PES: 11.1% vs.. 8.4%; P = 0.36) and incidence of stent thromboses (BP-PES: 2.15% vs.. 3.4%; P = 0.42) between groups. There was also no difference in MACCE between groups (17.6% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.49). The mean dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compliance at 1 year was 77% for BP-PES versus 92% for DP-PES (P = 0.03). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher long-term stroke free survival in BP-PES (P = 0.04). After adjustment, this was sustained with an additional tendency toward higher MI free survival for BP-PES (P = 0.059).. In this observational analysis, BP-PES were comparable to DP-PES, with regard to incidence of repeated revascularizations, stent thromboses and MACCE despite earlier DAPT discontinuation.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Poland; Polymers; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angina, Stable; Atorvastatin; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heptanoic Acids; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Middle Aged; Pyrroles; Treatment Outcome

The main purpose of the present study was to analyse the contemporary use of cardiovascular medications and diagnostic coronary angiography in men and women with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Furthermore, we examined the association of outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary angiography, procedural complications) with angiographic findings.. All patients with stable chest pain (n = 12 200) referred for a first-time elective diagnostic coronary angiography during 2006-08 and registered in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Register (SCAAR) were included. Significant CAD was defined as ≥ 50% luminal narrowing in any epicardial coronary artery.. In the youngest age group (≤ 59 years), more women than men (78.8 vs. 42.3%, P< 0.001) had normal/non-significant CAD, whereas more men had either left-main or three-vessel disease (18.2 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001). Event rates were similarly low for men and women with normal/non-significant CAD, except for a higher procedural complication rate in women. Prior to angiography, fewer women than men with high-risk features were prescribed aspirin (83 vs. 86.1%, P = 0.001).. In women, normal/non-significant CAD was highly prevalent, especially among younger women, and associated cardiovascular event rates were low. In men, findings of advanced disease were more common than in women, even younger men. Fewer high-risk women than men were initially prescribed aspirin. The observed sex differences suggest a need for improved identification of women appropriate for investigation with coronary angiography, earlier diagnostics in men, and heightened attention in the evidence-based use of aspirin in risk patients, especially women.

Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Retreatment; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; Sweden; Unnecessary Procedures

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Delivery of Health Care; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male

Topics: Acetanilides; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Health Care Costs; Humans; Piperazines; Ranolazine

To describe the epidemiology, impact, pathogenesis, patient presentation, and treatment of stable angina, including the use of vasculoprotective and antianginal drug therapies and coronary revascularization procedures.. Stable angina is an age-related condition that typically affects men at an earlier age than women, adversely affects quality of life, and increases mortality. Stable angina is the result of an increase in myocardial oxygen demand in the setting of coronary arteries chronically narrowed by large, stable atherosclerotic plaques and a diminished myocardial oxygen supply. The characteristics of the chest pain or discomfort contribute to the clinical presentation. Treatment guidelines call for efforts to modify CHD risk, antianginal drug therapy, and patient education. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and low-dose aspirin or clopidogrel may be used to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and death. A beta-blocker or a nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker may be used as initial antianginal drug therapy, and a long-acting nitrate or dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker may be added. The choice among antianginal drug therapies often hinges on patient characteristics, contraindications, and adverse effects. Revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery is an option for ischemia refractory to maximum tolerated dosages of antianginal therapy.. Various drug therapies may be used to manage stable angina, with coronary revascularization as an option in patients who are refractory to drug therapy. However, antianginal drug therapies may prove inadequate for managing anginal episodes for a variety of reasons, and revascularization is not always effective.

Topics: Age Factors; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Life; Sex Factors