carbamates and Nausea

carbamates has been researched along with Nausea in 31 studies

Nausea: An unpleasant sensation in the stomach usually accompanied by the urge to vomit. Common causes are early pregnancy, sea and motion sickness, emotional stress, intense pain, food poisoning, and various enteroviruses.

Research

Studies (31)

Authors

Clinical Trials (14)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

16 Wk EBR/GZR With RBV Efficacy on Patients With HCV RASs

"Efficacy of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Treatment with Zepatier (Elbasvir/Grazobevir) with Ribavirin (RBV) for 16 weeks when used in Genotype 1a patients with Baseline RASs (NS5a Resistance Associated Substitutions or RAPs -Resistance Associated Polymorphisms).~Efficacy defined as HCV RNA undetectable 12 weeks post treatment. Table excludes Genotype 1b patients." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post treatment

HCV SVR Durability -No Cirrhosis

Number/Percentage of patients with persistence of viral cure, SVR (SVR = Sustained Virologic Response)- defined as undetectable HCV RNA at least 24 weeks following HCV Treatment. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 24 weeks post-end of treatment up to 153 weeks

HCV SVR Durability-Patients With Cirrhosis

Percentage of Cirrhotic patients with persistence of viral cure, SVR, (SVR= Sustained Virologic Response) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at least 24 weeks following HCV Treatment. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Up to 132 weeks post HCV treatment

Mean Change in Fatigue PRO -EBR/GZR vs SOF/LDV

Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline and Average On-Treatment Score

Mean Change in Fatigue PRO Score -Phase 1

Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-treatment

Mean Change in HCV- PRO- Phase 1

"HCV-PRO, a survey for patients with HCV that measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess 'overall functioning and well-being'. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment

Mean Change in HCV-PRO (Functional Well-being) EBR/GZR vs. SOF/LDV Score-Phase 2

"HCV-PRO, a survey designed to assess functional status of patients with HCV and measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess functional well-being. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered. End of Treatment -Baseline were used to calculate CHANGE in outcome. Number of subjects reflects participants from both Phase 1 and 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: End of Treatment - Baseline

Mean Change in Headache-EBR/GZR and SOF/LDV

Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment

Mean Change in Headache-PRO Scores -Phase 1

Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement in symptom. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment

Mean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PRO Score -Phase 1

"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.~The estimates of mean change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes. The model expressed mean score as a function of DAA regimen, cirrhosis status, HCV genotype, sex, age, race, and previous treatment status." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to On-Treatment

Mean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PROMIS Score -EBR/GZR vs. LDV/SOF

"Participants completed the Patient Reported Outcomes surveys (PROs) 'PROMIS Nausea/Vomiting -4 Short Form' at baseline and during treatment. Raw scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a range of 45.0-80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea/vomiting.~Results presented as mean difference from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores (highest/worst) score during treatment.~A negative (-) PROMIS change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. Estimates of mean change were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline and Average On-Treatment Score

Median Change in Fatigue -Phase 1

Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment

Median Change in Fatigue-Phase 2

Fatigue severity collected from validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs), 'PROMIS Fatigue Short Form'. PROMIS® T-scores were computated to compare difference between baseline value of PROMIS score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Results presented as computated t-score from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores. A positive (+) score suggests improvements in functional well-being. A negative (-) PRO change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline-On Treatment (up to 16 weeks)

Median Change in HCV-PRO (Overall Well Being) -Phase 1

"HCV-PRO, a survey for patients with HCV that measures physical, emotional, and social functioning, productivity, intimacy, and perception of quality of life, was used to assess 'Overall Functioning and Well-being'. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive change (End of treatment to baseline) suggests improvements in functional well-being.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment

Median Change in Headache -Phase 1

Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Baseline and Average On-treatment Score)

Median Change in Headache-Phase 2

Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of median change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline -on Treatment (12-16 weeks)

Median Change in Nausea PRO Score -Phase 1

"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.~The estimates of change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment

Median Change in Nausea PROMIS Score-EBR/GZR SOF/LDV

"Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for change represent improvement.~The estimates of change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline- On Treatment (up to 16 weeks)

Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Caused Treatment Discontinuation-EBR/GZR vs. LDV/SOF

The number of participants with adverse events that led to early treatment discontinuation (defined as duration less than originally prescribed treatment regimen) (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Treatment start date through treatment completion (up to 24 weeks)

Phase 1 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)

"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~Number of subjects reflects participants randomized during Phase 1 only." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 -24 weeks post-treatment

Phase 1-Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation

"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as patients who have undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from Phase 1 only." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post-treatment

Phase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)

"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site).~Number of subjects reflects participants who started EBR/GZR or SOF/LDV- based treatment (with or without RBV) during Phase 1 and 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12-24 weeks post HCV treatment

Post-treatment Progression/Regression of Liver Disease-Fib-4

Mean change (delta) in FIB-4, an indirect non-invasive measure of liver fibrosis, calculated as baseline median -long term follow up median, following SVR after any of the study treatment regimens. Change in FIB-4 where negative values indicate improvement in liver fibrosis score and positive values indicate worsening of fibrosis score. There is no upper or lower limit for change. FIB-4 = age (years) * AST(IU/L)/Platelets (10^3/L) * ALT^.5(IU/L). In general, Score of 0-1.29 is low risk for advanced fibrosis, 1.30-1.67: intermediate risk for advanced liver fibrosis, >2.67: high risk for advanced fibrosis. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 3 years post treatment discontinuation

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDV

"SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation at discretion of provider).~mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from EBR/GZR with or without RBV and SOF/LDV with or without RBV randomized during Phase 1 and Phase 2." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post-treatment

Treatment Non-Adherence Probability Estimates

"The Voils Medication Adherence Survey (VMAS) was used to evaluate medication adherence during HCV treatment. Participants responded to three questions about the extent of adherence during the past seven days of treatment (during early and late on-treatment occasions). Participants responded using a five-point ordinal scale of missed dosing from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). On each occasion participants were coded as being Non-adherent if any response was > 1, otherwise they were coded as Adherent. Probability estimates of percentage of patients reporting non-adherence were calculated per HCV treatment (Direct Acting Antiviral-DAA) regimen: 1)EBR/GZV (elbasvir/grazoprevir, 2)SOF/LDV (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir), 3)PrOD" (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12-16 weeks of HCV treatment

Change in Functional Status (HCV-PRO) Within Treatment

"HCV-PRO score, a validated PROMIS survey used to evaluate overall functioning and well-being in HCV patients, was utilized to compare long-term 'within treatment' changes of functional well-being. In general, lower score is worst outcome and higher scores indicate greater well-being and functioning. However, for ease of interpretation, HCV-PRO scale has been transformed by using '100 - HCV-PRO' ultimately revising the score to mean 0 (lowest score) is best to 100 (worst outcome). A positive estimate (Post treatment to baseline) suggests baseline functional well-being improvement.~Total score = (SUM-N)/(4*N)*100, where N is the number of questions answered." (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: Treatment start date up to 2 years post-treatment

Change in HCV-associated Symptoms (PROMIS Measures) After HCV Treatment Initiation

Change in HCV-associated symptoms was calculated as the mean differences of mean scores from multiple surveys from the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-- Fatigue, nausea, belly pain, sleep disturbance, and diarrhea) and functional status (well-being) when comparing baseline to early post-treatment and late post treatment surveys. Mean change scores were calculated by comparing baseline to early post-treatment (1 yr) and late post-treatment (approximately 3 years) surveys. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement.Negative numbers suggest better symptoms (improvement in HCV-associated symptoms). PROMIS Fatigue Score scale per question: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always with 7 questions for a total maximum score of 35.HCV-PRO positive estimates suggest baseline functional well-being improvement. (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 1 year post treatment discontinuation (Early post-tx)

Impact of Baseline NS5A RASs on Treatment Outcomes-Phase 2

Number of participants who achieved SVR (sustained virologic response), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment with RASs (Resistant Associated Substitutions) after treatment with EBR/GZR or SOF/LDV regimen (NCT02786537)
Timeframe: 12 weeks post HCV treatment

Part 1 and Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Two sets of DCR were considered, one for confirmed and one for unconfirmed responses. Results are reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses combined. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. DCR was based on central review. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was calculated, as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. DOR was estimated for responders (i.e. participants achieving at least once CR or PR) only using a Kaplan-Meier method. CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. If a participant with a CR or PR had no progression or death due to underlying disease, the participant was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Results are based on confirmed BIRC response. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR, calculated as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Results are reported for confirmed BIRC response. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)

ECOG: participant's performance status was measured on a 6-point scale: 0= fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light and sedentary nature; 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care, but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50 percent (%) of waking hours; 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4= completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair: 5= dead. Definitive deterioration was defined as death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score with no subsequent improvement. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale

FACT-M:melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life. Melanoma specific subscale consists of 16 items related to signs,symptoms,physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma. Other items include physical, functional and social/family well-being (7 items each),emotional well-being (6 items),surgery specific concerns related to melanoma(8 items,not included in this study). Each item range from 0(not at all) to 4(very much), combined to produce subscale scores.Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to 172,higher scores represent better quality of life.Melanoma subscale score range from 0(worst response) to 64(best response),higher score indicated better quality of life. Time to definitive 10% deterioration:time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

"EORTC QLQ-C30 is 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social functioning), 3 multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), global health/quality of life (QOL) subscale and 6 single items assessing other cancer related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite, diarrhea, constipation and financial impact of cancer). It employed twenty-eight 4 point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7 point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Global health status scale score ranged from 0 to 100. Higher score represented better level of functioning. Time to definitive 10% deterioration: time from date of randomization to date of event with at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of corresponding scale score with no later improvement or death due to any cause." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Date of randomization to date of event or death due to any cause, which ever occurred first (maximum up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Objective Response (TTR)

TTR was the time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. Participants who did not achieve a PR or CR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have a PFS event or at maximum follow-up (i.e. first patient first visit [FPFV] to last patient last visit [LPLV] used for the analysis) when they had a PFS event. CR was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. TTR was estimated in the treatment arms using a Kaplan-Meier method. TTR was based on central review. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months for Part 1, excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 2 and Part 1 LGX 300 mg group)

Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) in Combo 450 Group as Compared to LGX818 Group

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm^2. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until documented disease progression (PD), initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 35 months for Part 1: LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) in Combo 450 Group as Compared to Vemurafenib Group

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC/central review and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 square millimeter (mm^2). (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until documented disease progression (PD), initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 29 months)

Part 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BIRC in Combo 300 Group as Compared to LGX818 Group

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) as per BIRC and survival information. If a participant did not had an event at the time of the analysis cut-off or at the start of any new anti-cancer therapy, data was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm^2. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: From randomization until documented disease progression (PD), initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, censoring date or death, whichever occurred first (up to 35 months)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consisted of two components: a health state profile (descriptive system) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in which participants rate their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), where higher scores indicated better health status. EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L health status index score range between 0 to 1. Higher score indicated better health status. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consisted of two components: a health state profile (descriptive system) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) in which participants rate their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), where higher scores indicated better health status. EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L health status index score range between 0 to 1. Higher score indicated better health status. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

"EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of multi-item and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items converted to 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represented a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represented more severe symptoms." (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

FACT-M: melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life. Melanoma specific subscale consists of 16 items related to signs, symptoms, physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma. Other items include physical, functional and social/family well-being (7 items each),emotional well-being (6 items),surgery specific concerns related to melanoma(8 items, not included in this study). Each item range from 0(not at all) to 4(very much), combined to produce subscale scores. Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to 172,higher scores represented better quality of life. Melanoma subscale score range from 0(worst response) to 64(best response),higher score indicated better quality of life. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Subscale at Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and End of Treatment Visit

FACT-M: melanoma specific questionnaire to assess participant health-related quality of life. Melanoma specific subscale consists of 16 items related to signs, symptoms, physical/social activities most relevant to participants with advanced-stage melanoma. Other items include physical, functional and social/family well-being (7 items each),emotional well-being (6 items),surgery specific concerns related to melanoma(8 items, not included in this study). Each item range from 0(not at all) to 4(very much), combined to produce subscale scores. Total score range for FACT-M excluding surgery specific items is 0 to 172,higher scores represented better quality of life. Melanoma subscale score range from 0(worst response) to 64(best response),higher score indicated better quality of life. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 and end of treatment visit (within14 days after the last dose of study drug)

Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)

ECOG: participant's performance status was measured on a 6-point scale: 0= fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light and sedentary nature; 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care, but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4= completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair: 5= dead. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Part 1 and Part 2: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 2 to Cycle 31)

Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shift From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03

Number of participants with clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter values based on national cancer institute common terminology criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grade, Version 4.03 were graded from Grades 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter = worsening by at least 2 grades or to >=grade 3. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Number of Participants With Dermatologic-related Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03

AESI consisted of events for which there was a specific clinical interest with regard to LGX818 and/or MEK162 treatment. Dermatologic-related AESI included rash, photosensitivity, nail disorders, skin infections, severe cutaneous adverse reactions and Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE) syndrome. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. AEs of grade 3 or 4 are reported in this outcome measure. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Newly occurring notable ECG values were reported for QT (millisecond [ms]), QTcF (millisecond), QTcB (millisecond) and heart rate (beats per minute). Newly occurring was defined as participants not meeting criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. Ranges for newly occurring notable ECG values (QT, QTcF, QTcB) are New greater than (>) 450, New >480, New >500, Increase from baseline >30, Increase from baseline >60. Heart rate: New <60, New >100 was considered as newly occurring notable value. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Notably Abnormal Vital Signs

Notably abnormal vital signs were: Low/high systolic blood pressure (SBP) (millimeter of mercury [mmHg]): less than or equal to (<=) 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 20 mmHg/>= 160 mmHg with increase from baseline of >=20 mmHg. Low/high diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [mmHg]: <= 50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of >=15 mmHg/>=100 mmHg with increase from baseline of >=15 mmHg. Low/high Pulse rate: <=50 beats per minute (bpm) with decrease from baseline of >=15 bpm/>= 120 bpm with increase from baseline of >=15 bpm. Low/high Weight [kilogram]: >=20 percent (%) decrease from baseline/>= 10% increase from baseline. Low/high Body temperature degree Celsius (C): <= 36 degree C/>= 37.5 degree C. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Number of Participants With Ocular-related Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03

AESI consisted of events for which there was a specific clinical interest with regard to LGX818 and/or MEK162 treatment. Ocular-related AESI included retinopathy excluding retinal vein occlusion (RVO), RVO and uveitis-type events. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. AEs of grade 3 or 4 are reported in this outcome measure. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Number of Participants With Worst Post-baseline Left Ventricular Dysfunction Events (LVEF) Values by Multigated Acquisition (MUGA) Scans or Transthoracic Echocardiograms (ECHO), by CTCAE Grade

Participants with worst post-baseline LVEF Values were graded as Grade 0: Non missing value below Grade 2; Grade 2: LVEF between 40% and 50% or absolute reduction from baseline >=10% and < 20%; Grade 3: LVEF between 20% and 39% or absolute reduction from baseline >=20%; Grade 4: LVEF lower than 20%. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first dose of study treatment. Missing data were due to participants who died or withdrew consent prior to the first scheduled evaluation or missed evaluations as protocol deviations. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; results in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that is considered to be important medical event. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence; Grade 5: death. AEs of all grades were reported. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days from last dose of study drug (up to 30 months), excluding Part 1: LGX818 300 mg group; up to 36 months for Part 1 LGX 300 mg group

Part 1: Plasma Concentrations of LGX 818

(NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1.5, 4 to 8 hours post dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose; Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose

Part 1: Plasma Concentrations of MEK162

(NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1.5, 4 to 8, hours post dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose; Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose

Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shift From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.0

Number of participants with clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter values based on national cancer institute common terminology criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grade, Version 4.0 were graded from Grades 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter = worsening by at least 2 grades or to >=grade 3. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Number of Participants With Dermatologic-related Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03

AESI consisted of events for which there was a specific clinical interest with regard to LGX818 and/or MEK162 treatment. Dermatologic-related AESI included rash, photosensitivity, nail disorders, skin infections, severe cutaneous adverse reactions and PPE syndrome. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. AEs of grade 3 or 4 are reported are reported in this outcome measure. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Notable ECG Values

Newly occurring notable ECG values were reported for QT (ms), QTcF (ms), QTcB (ms) and heart rate (bpm). Newly occurring was defined as participants not meeting criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. Ranges for newly occurring notable ECG values (QT, QTcF, QTcB) are New >450, New >480, New >500, increase from baseline >30, Increase from baseline >60. Heart rate: New < 60, New >100 was considered as newly occurring notable value. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Notably Abnormal Vital Signs

Notably abnormal vital signs were: Low/high systolic blood pressure (SBP) in millimeter of mercury (mmHg): less than or equal to (<=) 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of greater than or equal to (>=) 20 mmHg/>= 160 mmHg with increase from baseline of >=20 mmHg, Low/high diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [mmHg]: <=50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of >=15 mmHg/>=100 mmHg with increase from baseline of >=15 mmHg, Low/high pulse rate [bpm]: <=50 bpm with decrease from baseline of >=15 bpm/>=120 bpm with increase from baseline of >=15 bpm, Low/high weight (kg): >=20 % decrease from baseline/>= 10% increase from baseline Low/high Body temperature degree C): <= 36°C/>= 37.5 degree C. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Number of Participants With Ocular-related Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03

AESI consisted of events for which there was a specific clinical interest with regard to LGX818 and/or MEK162 treatment. Ocular-related AESI included retinopathy excluding RVO, RVO and uveitis-type events. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. AEs of grade 3 or 4 are reported in this outcome measure. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Number of Participants With Worst Post-baseline Left Ventricular Dysfunction Events (LVEF) Values by Multigated Acquisition (MUGA) Scans or Transthoracic Echocardiograms (ECHO), by CTCAE Grade

Participants with worst post-baseline LVEF Values were graded as Grade 0: Non missing value below Grade 2; Grade 2: LVEF between 40% and 50% or absolute reduction from baseline >=10% and < 20%;Grade 3: LVEF between 20% and 39% or absolute reduction from baseline >=20%; Grade 4: LVEF lower than 20%. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the first dose of study treatment. Missing data were due to participants who died or withdrew consent prior to the first scheduled evaluation or missed evaluations as protocol deviations. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; results in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that is considered to be important medical event. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical/diagnostic observations only; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence; Grade 5: death. AEs of all grades were reported. (NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 36 months)

Part 2: Plasma Concentrations of LGX 818

(NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1.5, 4 to 8 hours post dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose; Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose

Part 2: Plasma Concentrations of MEK162

(NCT01909453)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1.5, 4 to 8, hours post dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose; Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 144

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 144

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 48

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 96

(NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip BMD at Week 144

Hip BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip BMD at Week 96

Hip BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Hip BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 144

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2-microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio at Week 144

Urine Beta-2-microglobulin is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2-microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio at Week 48

Urine Beta-2-microglobulin is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2-microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio at Week 96

Urine Beta-2-microglobulin is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine RBP to Creatinine Ratio at Week 144

Urine RBP is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 144

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine RBP to Creatinine Ratio at Week 96

Urine RBP is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) to Creatinine Ratio at Week 48

Urine RBP is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Week 48

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Proteinuria Through Week 144

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method. The worst postbaseline value is presented for each participant. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Up to 144 weeks

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Proteinuria Through Week 48

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method. The worst postbaseline value is presented for each participant. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Proteinuria Through Week 96

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method. The worst postbaseline value is presented for each participant. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Up to 96 weeks

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 20 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, and 144

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, and 144 were analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Weeks 48, 96. and 144

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Weeks 96 and 144

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Weeks 96 and 144 were analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01780506)
Timeframe: Weeks 96 and 144

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48

(NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96

(NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 48

(NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 96

(NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip BMD at Week 96

Hip BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Hip BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 48

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96

Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2-microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio at Week 48

Urine Beta-2-microglobulin is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2-microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio at Week 96

Urine Beta-2-microglobulin is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine RBP to Creatinine Ratio at Week 96

Urine RBP is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) to Creatinine Ratio at Week 48

Urine RBP is a renal biomarker which is used to detect drug-induced kidney injury. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48

Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Week 48

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Week 96

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 20 Copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96

The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Weeks 48 and 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Weeks 48 and 96

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria Through Week 48

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method. The worst postbaseline value is presented for each participant. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Proteinuria Through Week 96

Grades 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) were the highest treatment-emergent postbaseline grades for urine protein using the dipstick method. The worst postbaseline value is presented for each participant. (NCT01797445)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96

Number of Subjects Cured

Subjects with post-treatment sustained virologic response (SVR) = Number of subjects with negative HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing therapy / number of subjects treated post-kidney transplantation (NCT02743897)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Number of Subjects With SAE Attributable to HCV Therapy

Number of subjects with major adverse events attributable to HCV therapy in post-kidney transplant (NCT02743897)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 weeks

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

The primary analysis will be based on a calculation of SVR rates (number of subjects with SVR; negative HCV RNA after completing Zepatier therapy) / (number of subjects treated with Zepatier post-heart transplantation) (NCT03146741)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Number of Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Attributable to HCV Therapy Post-heart Transplant

(NCT03146741)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 weeks

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR12)

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) was measured using the Roche COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test, v2.0 assay. SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA NCT02105467)
Timeframe: Week 24 (12 weeks after the end of treatment)

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR24)

Hepatitis C Virus RNA was measured using the Roche COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test, v2.0 assay. SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA NCT02105467)
Timeframe: Week 36 (24 weeks after the end of treatment)

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 4 Weeks After the End of Treatment (SVR4)

Hepatitis C Virus RNA was measured using the Roche COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test, v2.0 assay. SVR4 was defined as HCV RNA NCT02105467)
Timeframe: Week 16 (4 weeks after the end of treatment)

Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Study Treatment Because of an Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. (NCT02105467)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12 (end of Blinded Treatment)

Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. (NCT02105467)
Timeframe: Up to Week 14 (14 days after the Blinded Treatment was completed)

CD4+ Cell Count 2 Years Post-study

(NCT00110812)
Timeframe: two years following close of main study

Change in CD4 T Lymphocyte Count

change from baseline to month 12 in CD4 T lymphocyte count (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: At Month 12

Change in HIV-RNA Copies/ml (log10) From Baseline to Month 12

(NCT00110812)
Timeframe: month 12

Commencement of Continuous Antiretroviral Treatment

Number of patients commencing continuous antiretroviral treatment. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: from randomization through February 28, 2011, the end of the extension phase

Discontinuation of IL-2

Patients receiving fewer than 3 cycles of IL-2 by week 32 (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: week 32

Disease Progression or Death

occurrence of an opportunistic event (AIDS-defining infection or malignancy) or death (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: throughout study, through Feb 28 2009 (median followup of 19 months)

Fasting Lipid Profile

total fasting cholesterol (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: week 32

HIV-1 Genotype Changes

Patients who developed mutations associated with antiretroviral drugs. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: after 3rd cycle of IL-2

Initiation of Continuous ART

While patients were not taking ART at baseline or while undergoing IL-2 cycles (other than use of pericycle ART in one of the three groups), some chose to start an ART regimen during the study. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: from randomization through February 28, 2009

Mean Change in CD4+ T Lymphocyte Count

Change in CD4 count from baseline to week 32. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: Week 32

Opportunistic Disease or Death During the Trial Extension Phase

Incidence of an opportunistic event (AIDS-defining infection or malignancy) or death between February 28, 2009, when the main study ended, and February 28, 2011, when the extended phase was completed. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: two years following close of main study

Plasma HIV RNA

change from baseline in HIV-RNA copies/ml (log10) (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: At Week 32

SGOT

Number of participants with aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: week 32

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone

Number of participants with thyroid stimulating hormone greater than the upper limit of normal (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: week 32

Undetectable HIV-RNA

Patients with undetectable HIV-RNA levels measured at 24 months after the close of the main study, at the end of the extension phase. (NCT00110812)
Timeframe: 24 months post-trial

Reviews

5 reviews available for carbamates and Nausea

Trials

13 trials available for carbamates and Nausea

Other Studies

13 other studies available for carbamates and Nausea