carbamates has been researched along with Hepatic Insufficiency in 7 studies
Hepatic Insufficiency: Conditions in which the LIVER functions fall below the normal ranges. Severe hepatic insufficiency may cause LIVER FAILURE or DEATH. Treatment may include LIVER TRANSPLANTATION.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" Pharmacokinetics and safety assessments were performed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics and compared statistically by geometric least-squares mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals." | 2.87 | Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Velpatasvir and Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment. ( Brainard, DM; Curtis, C; Lasseter, K; Lawitz, E; Ling, KHJ; Marbury, T; Mathias, A; Mogalian, E; Moorehead, L; Murray, B; Osinusi, A; Perry, R, 2018) |
" Participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI and controls (aged 18 to 65 years) matched for race, age, sex, and body mass index were enrolled in a 3-part, open-label, sequential-panel pharmacokinetic study." | 2.84 | Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Grazoprevir, a Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitor. ( Angus, P; Butterton, JR; Caro, L; Fandozzi, C; Fraser, IP; Gane, E; Guo, Z; Ho, M; Iwamoto, M; Marbury, T; Panebianco, D; Reitmann, C; Smith, WB; Talaty, J; Uemura, N; Wenning, L; Yeh, WW, 2017) |
" Adverse events included eye stye, insomnia, and pain from an infiltrated intravenous line." | 2.80 | Pharmacokinetics and safety of co-administered paritaprevir plus ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in hepatic impairment. ( Awni, WM; Bernstein, BM; Ding, B; Dutta, S; Khatri, A; Lawitz, EJ; Marbury, TC; Menon, RM; Mullally, VM; Podsadecki, TJ, 2015) |
" Here we report pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety results from two multicenter, open-label, single-dose trials evaluating revefenacin in subjects with severe renal impairment (NCT02578082) and moderate hepatic impairment (NCT02581592)." | 1.51 | Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function. ( Barnes, CN; Borin, MT; Bourdet, DL; Lo, A; Pendyala, S, 2019) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 7 (100.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Borin, MT | 1 |
Lo, A | 1 |
Barnes, CN | 1 |
Pendyala, S | 1 |
Bourdet, DL | 1 |
Caro, L | 1 |
Wenning, L | 1 |
Guo, Z | 1 |
Fraser, IP | 1 |
Fandozzi, C | 1 |
Talaty, J | 1 |
Panebianco, D | 1 |
Ho, M | 1 |
Uemura, N | 1 |
Reitmann, C | 1 |
Angus, P | 1 |
Gane, E | 1 |
Marbury, T | 2 |
Smith, WB | 1 |
Iwamoto, M | 1 |
Butterton, JR | 1 |
Yeh, WW | 1 |
Mogalian, E | 1 |
Brainard, DM | 1 |
Osinusi, A | 1 |
Moorehead, L | 1 |
Murray, B | 1 |
Ling, KHJ | 1 |
Perry, R | 1 |
Curtis, C | 1 |
Lawitz, E | 2 |
Lasseter, K | 1 |
Mathias, A | 1 |
Khatri, A | 2 |
Menon, RM | 1 |
Marbury, TC | 1 |
Lawitz, EJ | 1 |
Podsadecki, TJ | 1 |
Mullally, VM | 1 |
Ding, B | 1 |
Awni, WM | 1 |
Bernstein, BM | 1 |
Dutta, S | 1 |
Chtioui, H | 1 |
Buclin, T | 1 |
Menon, R | 1 |
Poordad, F | 1 |
Gutierrez, JA | 1 |
Kakuda, TN | 1 |
Picchio, G | 1 |
Beets, G | 1 |
Vandevoorde, A | 1 |
Van Remoortere, P | 1 |
Jacquemyn, B | 1 |
Luo, D | 1 |
Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, S | 1 |
Vijgen, L | 1 |
Van Eygen, V | 1 |
Beumont, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Effect of Moderate Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics Following Single-Dose Inhaled Administration of TD-4208[NCT02581592] | Phase 1 | 16 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-11-30 | Completed | ||
The Effect of Severe Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics Following Single-Dose Inhaled Administration of TD 4208[NCT02578082] | Phase 1 | 16 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-12-31 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, 3-Part, Multiple Dose Study to Investigate the Influence of Hepatic Insufficiency on the Pharmacokinetics of Grazoprevir (MK-5172)[NCT01390428] | Phase 1 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-07-28 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2 Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 12 Weeks of Treatment With Simeprevir, Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir, Followed by a 5-Year Post-treatment Long-term Follow-up, in Treatment-naïve and Treatment-experienced[NCT02262728] | Phase 2 | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-09-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, and from 0.5 to 24 hours post-dose on Day 10 in order to determine the plasma t1/2 of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Day 10 at the following timepoints: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | hr. (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Part 1-Mild HI | 54.24 |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 35.85 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 39.59 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 39.80 |
Part 3-Severe HI | 42.00 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 31.02 |
Blood samples were collected at 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in order to determine the plasma C24 of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Day 1 at 24 hours postdose
Intervention | nM (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Part 1-Mild HI | 21.4 |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 11.5 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 17.7 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 5.90 |
Blood samples were collected at 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 in order to determine the plasma C24 of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Day 1 at 24 hours postdose
Intervention | nM (Median) |
---|---|
Part 3-Severe HI | 15.6 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 1.86 |
Blood samples were collected at 24 hours post-dose on Day 10 in order to determine the plasma C24 of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Days 10 at 24 hours postdose
Intervention | nM (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Part 1-Mild HI | 32.6 |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 17.0 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 48.9 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 13.6 |
Part 3-Severe HI | 55.0 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 5.89 |
Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, and from 0.5 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 in order to determine the plasma AUC0-24 of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 10 at the following timepoints: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | uM*hr (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 10 | |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 1.42 | 3.74 |
Part 1-Mild HI | 1.71 | 6.20 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 0.321 | 0.874 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 1.61 | 4.21 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 0.0592 | 0.257 |
Part 3-Severe HI | 1.17 | 3.00 |
Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, and from 0.5 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 in order to determine the plasma Cmax of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 10 at the following timepoints: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | uM (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 10 | |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 0.305 | 1.02 |
Part 1-Mild HI | 0.257 | 1.40 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 0.0580 | 0.106 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 0.433 | 0.631 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 0.0157 | 0.0304 |
Part 3-Severe HI | 0.238 | 0.396 |
Blood samples were collected at pre-dose, and from 0.5 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 in order to determine the plasma Tmax of Grazoprevir. Classification of HI based on the Child-Pugh scale, where a score of 5-6 = Mild HI; a score of 7-9 = Moderate HI; and a score of 10-15 = Severe HI. (NCT01390428)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 10 at the following timepoints: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | hr. (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 10 | |
Part 1-Healthy Matched to Mild HI | 2.50 | 3.01 |
Part 1-Mild HI | 3.50 | 3.00 |
Part 2-Healthy Matched to Moderate HI | 1.75 | 2.00 |
Part 2-Moderate HI | 2.00 | 3.00 |
Part 3-Healthy Matched to Severe HI | 1.50 | 1.00 |
Part 3-Severe HI | 1.75 | 1.75 |
On-treatment failure is defined as participants who do not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 0 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 0 |
Participants were considered to have achieved SVR12 if the hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) was less than (<) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 15 international unit per milliliter [IU/mL]) detectable or undetectable at 12 weeks after the end of study drug treatment. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 100 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 100 |
Percentage of participants with SVR12 who maintained to have HCV RNA
Timeframe: Week 24 post treatment until the end of 3-year follow-up
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 78.9 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 85.7 |
(NCT02262728)
Timeframe: Follow-up Week 24 (Week 36)
Intervention | Units per Liter (U/L) (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline : ALT | Baseline : AST | Follow-Up Week 24 : ALT | Follow-Up Week 24 : AST | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 137.8 | 119.1 | 34.8 | 39.2 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 60.9 | 83.5 | 32.3 | 35.0 |
The AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng.h/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simeprevir : Week 2 | Simeprevir : Week 8 | Daclatasvir : Week 2 | Daclatasvir : Week 8 | Sofosbuvir : Week 2 | Sofosbuvir : Week 8 | GS-331007 : Week 2 | GS-331007 : Week 8 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 113835 | 98568 | 16487 | 15574 | 2870 | 2746 | 17900 | 18132 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 142162 | 207221 | 17858 | 20787 | 3915 | 3933 | 21118 | 22829 |
The Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simeprevir : Week 2 (reference) | Simeprevir : Week 8 (test) | Daclatasvir : Week 2 | Daclatasvir : Week 8 | Sofosbuvir : Week 2 | Sofosbuvir : Week 8 | GS-331007 : Week 2 | GS-331007 : Week 8 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 6976 | 6029 | 1187 | 1072 | 1571 | 1276 | 1403 | 1404 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 7726 | 10498 | 1145 | 1210 | 1615 | 1527 | 1561 | 1594 |
The Cmin is the minimum observed plasma concentration. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simeprevir : Week 2 | Simeprevir : Week 8 | Daclatasvir : Week 2 | Daclatasvir : Week 8 | Sofosbuvir : Week 2 | Sofosbuvir : Week 8 | GS-331007 : Week 2 | GS-331007 : Week 8 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 3133 | 2639 | 414 | 442 | NA | NA | 419 | 443 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 4363 | 6955 | 519 | 660 | NA | NA | 441 | 523 |
On-treatment virologic response was determined by HCV RNA results satisfying a specified threshold. The following thresholds were considered at any time point:
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 1 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 1: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 1 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 1 : < 15 IU/mL Undetectable | Week 2 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 2 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 2: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 2 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 2: < 15 IU/mL undetectable (vRVR) | Week 4 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 4 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 4: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 4 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 4 : < 15 IU/mL undetectable (RVR) | Week 6 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 6 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 6: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 6 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 6 : < 15 IU/mL undetectable | Week 8 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 8 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 8: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 8 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 8 : < 15 IU/mL undetectable | Week 10 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 10 : < 100 IU/mL | Week 10: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 10 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 10 : < 15 IU/mL undetectable | Week 12 : >= 15 IU/mL | Week 12 :< 100 IU/mL | Week 12: < 15 IU/mL undetect/detectable | Week 12 : < 15 IU/mL detectable | Week 12 : < 15 IU/mL undetectable | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 72.2 | 61.1 | 27.8 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 10.5 | 94.7 | 89.5 | 36.8 | 52.6 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 5.6 | 94.4 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 5.3 | 94.7 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 76.2 | 38.1 | 23.8 | 19.0 | 4.8 | 47.6 | 71.4 | 52.4 | 19.0 | 33.3 | 9.5 | 100.0 | 90.5 | 28.6 | 61.9 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 4.8 | 95.2 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 |
Participants were considered to have achieved SVR4 and SVR24 if the HCV RNA was
Timeframe: Week 16 and Week 36
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
SVR 4 | SVR 24 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 100 | 100 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 100 | 100 |
The C0h is the pre-dose plasma concentration. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simeprevir : Week 2 | Simeprevir : Week 8 | Daclatasvir : Week 2 | Daclatasvir : Week 8 | Sofosbuvir : Week 2 | Sofosbuvir : Week 8 | GS-331007 : Week 2 | GS-331007 : Week 8 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 3577 | 3160 | 494 | 492 | NA | NA | 484 | 478 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 5218 | 8577 | 646 | 824 | NA | NA | 490 | 572 |
Tmax is the time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT02262728)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-dose on Weeks 2 and 8
Intervention | Hours (Median) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simeprevir: Week 2 | Simeprevir: Week 8 | Daclatasvir: Week 2 | Daclatasvir: Week 8 | Sofosbuvir: Week 2 | Sofosbuvir: Week 8 | GS-331007: Week 2 | GS-331007: Week 8 | |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh A | 6.00 | 6.00 | 3.00 | 2.50 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
SMV 150mg/DCV 60mg/SOF 400mg - Child-Pugh B | 8.00 | 8.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
4 trials available for carbamates and Hepatic Insufficiency
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Grazoprevir, a Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitor.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amides; Antiviral Agents; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Ther | 2017 |
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Velpatasvir and Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; | 2018 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of co-administered paritaprevir plus ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in hepatic impairment.
Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhib | 2015 |
Simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus-infected patients with decompensated liver disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; | 2017 |
3 other studies available for carbamates and Hepatic Insufficiency
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; H | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; H | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; H | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; H | 2019 |
Pharmacokinetics in hepatic impairment: Mind the protein binding.
Topics: Anilides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Macrocyclic Compo | 2015 |
Reply to "Pharmacokinetics in hepatic impairment: Mind the protein binding".
Topics: Anilides; Carbamates; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Macrocyclic Compo | 2015 |