carbamates has been researched along with Diabetic Neuropathies in 7 studies
Diabetic Neuropathies: Peripheral, autonomic, and cranial nerve disorders that are associated with DIABETES MELLITUS. These conditions usually result from diabetic microvascular injury involving small blood vessels that supply nerves (VASA NERVORUM). Relatively common conditions which may be associated with diabetic neuropathy include third nerve palsy (see OCULOMOTOR NERVE DISEASES); MONONEUROPATHY; mononeuropathy multiplex; diabetic amyotrophy; a painful POLYNEUROPATHY; autonomic neuropathy; and thoracoabdominal neuropathy. (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p1325)
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"To report a case of clinically significant hypoglycemia attributed to the concomitant use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and repaglinide by a diabetic patient." | 7.76 | Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient. ( Blondel, E; Fonrose, X; Mallaret, MP; Roustit, M; Villier, C, 2010) |
"To report a case of clinically significant hypoglycemia attributed to the concomitant use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and repaglinide by a diabetic patient." | 3.76 | Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient. ( Blondel, E; Fonrose, X; Mallaret, MP; Roustit, M; Villier, C, 2010) |
" Dizziness was the only treatment-emergent adverse event occurring at ≥10% difference in carisbamate groups versus placebo (study 1: 12% vs." | 2.79 | Efficacy and safety of carisbamate in patients with diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: results from 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials. ( Brashear, HR; DiBernardo, A; Ford, LM; Shi, Y; Smith, T; Todd, MJ, 2014) |
"Diet or tablet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 256; age 40-75 years, body mass index (BMI) 20-35 kg/m2, HbA1c 4." | 2.70 | Comparison between repaglinide and glipizide in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year multicentre study. ( Dejgaard, A; Kilhovd, B; Lager, I; Madsbad, S; Mustajoki, P, 2001) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (14.29) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 2 (28.57) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (57.14) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Smith, T | 1 |
DiBernardo, A | 1 |
Shi, Y | 1 |
Todd, MJ | 1 |
Brashear, HR | 1 |
Ford, LM | 1 |
Niphakis, MJ | 1 |
Cognetta, AB | 1 |
Chang, JW | 1 |
Buczynski, MW | 1 |
Parsons, LH | 1 |
Byrne, F | 1 |
Burston, JJ | 1 |
Chapman, V | 1 |
Cravatt, BF | 1 |
Roustit, M | 1 |
Blondel, E | 1 |
Villier, C | 1 |
Fonrose, X | 1 |
Mallaret, MP | 1 |
Rauck, R | 1 |
Makumi, CW | 1 |
Schwartz, S | 1 |
Graff, O | 1 |
Meno-Tetang, G | 1 |
Bell, CF | 1 |
Kavanagh, ST | 1 |
McClung, CL | 1 |
Schmidt, RE | 1 |
Green, KG | 1 |
Feng, D | 1 |
Dorsey, DA | 1 |
Parvin, CA | 1 |
Lee, JM | 1 |
Xiao, Q | 1 |
Brines, M | 1 |
Field, MJ | 1 |
McCleary, S | 1 |
Boden, P | 1 |
Suman-Chauhan, N | 1 |
Hughes, J | 1 |
Singh, L | 1 |
Madsbad, S | 1 |
Kilhovd, B | 1 |
Lager, I | 1 |
Mustajoki, P | 1 |
Dejgaard, A | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study PXN110448: A Dose-response Study of XP13512, Compared With Concurrent Placebo Control and LYRICA(Pregabalin), in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated Withdiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)[NCT00643760] | Phase 2 | 421 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-03-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Baseline and EOMT scores are the pain scores each participant reported after taking a 50-foot walk at the randomization and Week 13/Withdrawal visits, respectively, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with BMI, baseline pain intensity after 50-foot walk, pain intensity prior to 50-foot walk at the visit being assessed, and grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.38 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.32 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.36 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.52 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -2.17 |
Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the Baseline score. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.08 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.43 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.10 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.63 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.65 |
"Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity right now. Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.19 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.24 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.10 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.66 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.65 |
"Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity right now. Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.90 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.08 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -1.95 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.40 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.50 |
Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | milligrams (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -261.99 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -171.64 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -102.51 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -228.54 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -246.07 |
Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.07 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.35 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.06 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.54 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.50 |
Day-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.33 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.35 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.25 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.88 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.62 |
Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.99 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.15 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.04 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.71 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.83 |
Night-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.25 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.24 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.25 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -3.00 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.86 |
Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.35 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.54 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.45 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -3.01 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -2.24 |
"The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of very much improved or much improved. EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 39 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | 20 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | 22 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | 50 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | 17 |
"The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of very much improved or much improved. EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 46 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | 22 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | 24 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | 53 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | 62 |
Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is >=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as first day of event minus last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Any time post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13)
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 24 |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | 25 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | 22 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | 15 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | 29 |
The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tension/Anxiety Domain Score | Depression/Rejection Domain Score | Anger/Hostility Domain Score | Vigor/Activity Domain Score | Fatigue/Inertia Domain Score | Confusion/Bewilderment Domain Score | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -0.6 | -0.2 | -0.8 | -0.1 | -0.5 | 0.2 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.5 | 0.1 | -1.1 | -0.1 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -0.9 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 0.7 | -1.1 | 0.0 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -0.3 | 0.4 | -0.3 | -0.4 | -0.1 | -0.2 |
Placebo | -1.0 | -0.5 | -0.5 | 0.6 | -0.8 | -0.3 |
The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
SF-MPQ Total Score | SF-MPQ Sensory Score | SF-MPQ Affective Score | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -6.55 | -4.83 | -1.65 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -6.75 | -5.31 | -1.45 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -7.56 | -5.50 | -2.07 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -4.01 | -2.73 | -1.26 |
Placebo | -5.85 | -4.25 | -1.63 |
The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPS 10 Score | NPS 8 Score | NPS Non-Allodynic Score | NPS 4 Score | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -18.43 | -17.83 | -18.89 | -20.90 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -22.24 | -21.84 | -22.86 | -25.15 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -25.49 | -25.14 | -26.35 | -27.84 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -16.16 | -16.19 | -15.63 | -16.06 |
Placebo | -18.92 | -18.73 | -19.37 | -20.54 |
The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score | SF-36 Mental Component Summary Score | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | 3.5 | 0.4 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | 3.7 | 1.5 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | 4.6 | 1.6 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | 3.7 | 0.7 |
Placebo | 3.1 | 2.5 |
The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Brief Pain Inventory Severity of Pain | Brief Pain Inventory Interference of Pain | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | -2.3 | -2.0 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | -2.4 | -2.1 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | -2.8 | -2.5 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | -1.7 | -1.9 |
Placebo | -2.1 | -2.0 |
Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>= 0% reduction from baseline | >= 10% reduction from baseline | >= 20% reduction from baseline | >= 30% reduction from baseline | >= 40% reduction from baseline | >= 50% reduction from baseline | >= 60% reduction from baseline | >= 70% reduction from baseline | >= 80% reduction from baseline | >= 90% reduction from baseline | 100% reduction from baseline | |
GEn 1200 mg/Day | 55 | 43 | 36 | 31 | 28 | 26 | 21 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 4 |
GEn 2400 mg/Day | 50 | 42 | 34 | 25 | 19 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
GEn 3600 mg/Day | 101 | 91 | 78 | 66 | 55 | 46 | 41 | 25 | 17 | 8 | 5 |
PGB 300 mg/Day | 55 | 42 | 36 | 28 | 20 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Placebo | 103 | 86 | 73 | 57 | 46 | 35 | 26 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 3 |
3 trials available for carbamates and Diabetic Neuropathies
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of carisbamate in patients with diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: results from 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method; | 2014 |
A randomized, controlled trial of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetic Neuropathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; | 2013 |
Comparison between repaglinide and glipizide in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year multicentre study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies | 2001 |
4 other studies available for carbamates and Diabetic Neuropathies
Article | Year |
---|---|
Evaluation of NHS carbamates as a potent and selective class of endocannabinoid hydrolase inhibitors.
Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Blood Glucose; Brain; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neur | 2013 |
Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Me | 2010 |
Erythropoietin and its carbamylated derivative prevent the development of experimental diabetic autonomic neuropathy in STZ-induced diabetic NOD-SCID mice.
Topics: Animals; Carbamates; Cells, Cultured; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Neuropathies; Erythr | 2008 |
Involvement of the central tachykinin NK1 receptor during maintenance of mechanical hypersensitivity induced by diabetes in the rat.
Topics: Animals; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Neuropathies; Electrophy | 1998 |