Page last updated: 2024-10-16

carbamates and Diabetic Neuropathies

carbamates has been researched along with Diabetic Neuropathies in 7 studies

Diabetic Neuropathies: Peripheral, autonomic, and cranial nerve disorders that are associated with DIABETES MELLITUS. These conditions usually result from diabetic microvascular injury involving small blood vessels that supply nerves (VASA NERVORUM). Relatively common conditions which may be associated with diabetic neuropathy include third nerve palsy (see OCULOMOTOR NERVE DISEASES); MONONEUROPATHY; mononeuropathy multiplex; diabetic amyotrophy; a painful POLYNEUROPATHY; autonomic neuropathy; and thoracoabdominal neuropathy. (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p1325)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To report a case of clinically significant hypoglycemia attributed to the concomitant use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and repaglinide by a diabetic patient."7.76Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient. ( Blondel, E; Fonrose, X; Mallaret, MP; Roustit, M; Villier, C, 2010)
"To report a case of clinically significant hypoglycemia attributed to the concomitant use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and repaglinide by a diabetic patient."3.76Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient. ( Blondel, E; Fonrose, X; Mallaret, MP; Roustit, M; Villier, C, 2010)
" Dizziness was the only treatment-emergent adverse event occurring at ≥10% difference in carisbamate groups versus placebo (study 1: 12% vs."2.79Efficacy and safety of carisbamate in patients with diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: results from 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials. ( Brashear, HR; DiBernardo, A; Ford, LM; Shi, Y; Smith, T; Todd, MJ, 2014)
"Diet or tablet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 256; age 40-75 years, body mass index (BMI) 20-35 kg/m2, HbA1c 4."2.70Comparison between repaglinide and glipizide in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year multicentre study. ( Dejgaard, A; Kilhovd, B; Lager, I; Madsbad, S; Mustajoki, P, 2001)

Research

Studies (7)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (14.29)18.2507
2000's2 (28.57)29.6817
2010's4 (57.14)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Smith, T1
DiBernardo, A1
Shi, Y1
Todd, MJ1
Brashear, HR1
Ford, LM1
Niphakis, MJ1
Cognetta, AB1
Chang, JW1
Buczynski, MW1
Parsons, LH1
Byrne, F1
Burston, JJ1
Chapman, V1
Cravatt, BF1
Roustit, M1
Blondel, E1
Villier, C1
Fonrose, X1
Mallaret, MP1
Rauck, R1
Makumi, CW1
Schwartz, S1
Graff, O1
Meno-Tetang, G1
Bell, CF1
Kavanagh, ST1
McClung, CL1
Schmidt, RE1
Green, KG1
Feng, D1
Dorsey, DA1
Parvin, CA1
Lee, JM1
Xiao, Q1
Brines, M1
Field, MJ1
McCleary, S1
Boden, P1
Suman-Chauhan, N1
Hughes, J1
Singh, L1
Madsbad, S1
Kilhovd, B1
Lager, I1
Mustajoki, P1
Dejgaard, A1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Study PXN110448: A Dose-response Study of XP13512, Compared With Concurrent Placebo Control and LYRICA(Pregabalin), in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated Withdiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)[NCT00643760]Phase 2421 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Pain Score After Taking a 50-foot Walk at EOMT

Baseline and EOMT scores are the pain scores each participant reported after taking a 50-foot walk at the randomization and Week 13/Withdrawal visits, respectively, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with BMI, baseline pain intensity after 50-foot walk, pain intensity prior to 50-foot walk at the visit being assessed, and grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.38
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.32
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.36
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.52
PGB 300 mg/Day-2.17

Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data

Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the Baseline score. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.08
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.43
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.10
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.63
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.65

Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

"Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity right now. Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.19
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.24
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.10
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.66
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.65

Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Morning) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

"Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity right now. Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.90
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.08
GEn 2400 mg/Day-1.95
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.40
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.50

Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionmilligrams (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-261.99
GEn 1200 mg/Day-171.64
GEn 2400 mg/Day-102.51
GEn 3600 mg/Day-228.54
PGB 300 mg/Day-246.07

Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.07
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.35
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.06
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.54
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.50

Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Day-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.33
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.35
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.25
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.88
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.62

Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.99
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.15
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.04
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.71
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.83

Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Night-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.25
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.24
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.25
GEn 3600 mg/Day-3.00
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.86

Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.35
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.54
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.45
GEn 3600 mg/Day-3.01
PGB 300 mg/Day-2.24

Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data

"The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of very much improved or much improved. EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo39
GEn 1200 mg/Day20
GEn 2400 mg/Day22
GEn 3600 mg/Day50
PGB 300 mg/Day17

Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data

"The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of very much improved or much improved. EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit." (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo46
GEn 1200 mg/Day22
GEn 2400 mg/Day24
GEn 3600 mg/Day53
PGB 300 mg/Day62

Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score

Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is >=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as first day of event minus last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Any time post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13)

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo24
GEn 1200 mg/Day25
GEn 2400 mg/Day22
GEn 3600 mg/Day15
PGB 300 mg/Day29

Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data

The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tension/Anxiety Domain ScoreDepression/Rejection Domain ScoreAnger/Hostility Domain ScoreVigor/Activity Domain ScoreFatigue/Inertia Domain ScoreConfusion/Bewilderment Domain Score
GEn 1200 mg/Day-0.6-0.2-0.8-0.1-0.50.2
GEn 2400 mg/Day-0.7-0.6-0.50.1-1.1-0.1
GEn 3600 mg/Day-0.9-0.3-0.30.7-1.10.0
PGB 300 mg/Day-0.30.4-0.3-0.4-0.1-0.2
Placebo-1.0-0.5-0.50.6-0.8-0.3

Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data

The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SF-MPQ Total ScoreSF-MPQ Sensory ScoreSF-MPQ Affective Score
GEn 1200 mg/Day-6.55-4.83-1.65
GEn 2400 mg/Day-6.75-5.31-1.45
GEn 3600 mg/Day-7.56-5.50-2.07
PGB 300 mg/Day-4.01-2.73-1.26
Placebo-5.85-4.25-1.63

Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data

The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
NPS 10 ScoreNPS 8 ScoreNPS Non-Allodynic ScoreNPS 4 Score
GEn 1200 mg/Day-18.43-17.83-18.89-20.90
GEn 2400 mg/Day-22.24-21.84-22.86-25.15
GEn 3600 mg/Day-25.49-25.14-26.35-27.84
PGB 300 mg/Day-16.16-16.19-15.63-16.06
Placebo-18.92-18.73-19.37-20.54

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at EOMT Using LOCF Data

The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SF-36 Physical Component Summary ScoreSF-36 Mental Component Summary Score
GEn 1200 mg/Day3.50.4
GEn 2400 mg/Day3.71.5
GEn 3600 mg/Day4.61.6
PGB 300 mg/Day3.70.7
Placebo3.12.5

Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data

The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT

,,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Brief Pain Inventory Severity of PainBrief Pain Inventory Interference of Pain
GEn 1200 mg/Day-2.3-2.0
GEn 2400 mg/Day-2.4-2.1
GEn 3600 mg/Day-2.8-2.5
PGB 300 mg/Day-1.7-1.9
Placebo-2.1-2.0

Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data

Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity. (NCT00643760)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
>= 0% reduction from baseline>= 10% reduction from baseline>= 20% reduction from baseline>= 30% reduction from baseline>= 40% reduction from baseline>= 50% reduction from baseline>= 60% reduction from baseline>= 70% reduction from baseline>= 80% reduction from baseline>= 90% reduction from baseline100% reduction from baseline
GEn 1200 mg/Day55433631282621171154
GEn 2400 mg/Day504234251915116521
GEn 3600 mg/Day101917866554641251785
PGB 300 mg/Day55423628201495433
Placebo103867357463526151143

Trials

3 trials available for carbamates and Diabetic Neuropathies

ArticleYear
Efficacy and safety of carisbamate in patients with diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: results from 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
    Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2014, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blind Method;

2014
A randomized, controlled trial of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
    Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2013, Volume: 13, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetic Neuropathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug;

2013
Comparison between repaglinide and glipizide in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year multicentre study.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2001, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies

2001

Other Studies

4 other studies available for carbamates and Diabetic Neuropathies

ArticleYear
Evaluation of NHS carbamates as a potent and selective class of endocannabinoid hydrolase inhibitors.
    ACS chemical neuroscience, 2013, Sep-18, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Blood Glucose; Brain; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neur

2013
Symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and repaglinide in a diabetic patient.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2010, Volume: 44, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Me

2010
Erythropoietin and its carbamylated derivative prevent the development of experimental diabetic autonomic neuropathy in STZ-induced diabetic NOD-SCID mice.
    Experimental neurology, 2008, Volume: 209, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Carbamates; Cells, Cultured; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Neuropathies; Erythr

2008
Involvement of the central tachykinin NK1 receptor during maintenance of mechanical hypersensitivity induced by diabetes in the rat.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1998, Volume: 285, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Neuropathies; Electrophy

1998