carbamates and Daytime Sleepiness

carbamates has been researched along with Daytime Sleepiness in 26 studies

Research

Studies (26)

Authors

Clinical Trials (6)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score

"Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness.~The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. This analysis included treatment group and randomization stratification factor (narcolepsy vs. OSA) as fixed effects. The ESS score at the beginning of the randomized withdrawal period was used as the covariate. The response variable was the change in ESS score from the beginning to the end of 2- week randomized withdrawal period." (NCT02348632)
Timeframe: Start of randomized withdrawal phase to end of randomized withdrawal (2 weeks)

Subjects Reported as Worse on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc)

Subjects reported as worse (very much worse, much worse, and minimally worse) on the CGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline. (NCT02348632)
Timeframe: Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)

Subjects Reported as Worse on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc)

Percentage of subjects reported as worse (minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse) on the PGIc during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period. The beginning of the randomized withdrawal period represents efficacy baseline. (NCT02348632)
Timeframe: Beginning of randomized withdrawal phase to end of the randomized withdrawal phase (2 weeks)

Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12

"Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from Baseline to Week 12. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness.~The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. The response variable was the change in ESS score from baseline." (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12

Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from baseline to Week 12. MWT sleep latency ranges from 0 to 40 minutes, with higher scores indicating greater ability to stay awake; a positive change from baseline represents improvement in the sleep latency time. Mean sleep latency defined as the average of the first 4 MWT trials, if 3 or 4 of them are non-missing. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Change in Sleep Latency Time on MWT Trial 1 at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at Week 12. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Change from baseline for sleep latency in MWT during trial 1 at week 12

Change in Sleep Latency Time on MWT Trial 2 at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at Week 12. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Change from baseline for sleep latency in MWT during trial 2 at week 12

Change in Sleep Latency Time on MWT Trial 3 at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at Week 12. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Change from baseline for sleep latency in MWT during trial 3 at week 12

Change in Sleep Latency Time on MWT Trial 4 at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at Week 12. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Change from baseline for sleep latency in MWT during trial 4 at week 12

Change in Sleep Latency Time on MWT Trial 5 at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at Week 12. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Change from baseline for sleep latency in MWT during trial 5 at week 12

Change in the Mean Sleep Latency Time as Determined From the First 4 Trials of a 40-Minute MWT From Baseline to Week 4

Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Subjects Reported Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc) at Week 12

Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the PGIc at Week 12. PGIc was rated by subjects and measures the change in their condition since treatment starts on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very much improved to 7= very much worse (NCT02348593)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12

"Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from Baseline to Week 12. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness.~The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. The response variable was the change in ESS score from baseline." (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12

Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from baseline to Week 12. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Change in the Mean Sleep Latency Time as Determined From the First 4 Trials of a 40-minute MWT From Baseline to Week 4

Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from baseline to week 4. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Percentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc) at Week 12

Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the CGIc at Week 12. CGIc was rated by clinicians and measures the change in the subject's condition since treatment starts on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very much improved to 7= very much worse. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Week 12

Subjects Reported Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc) at Week 12

"Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the PGIc at Week 12. PGIc was rated by subjects and measures the change in their condition since start of treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse.~This is the key secondary endpoint." (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8

"Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, and 8. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness.~The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. The response variable was the change in ESS score from baseline." (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, and 8

Change in Sleep Latency Time on Each of the 5 MWT Trials at Week 12

Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at week 12. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Percentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the CGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8

Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the CGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8. CGIc was rated by clinicians and measures the change in the subject's condition since treatment starts on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very much improved to 7= very much worse. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 4, and 8

Percentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the PGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8

Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the PGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8. PGIc was rated by subjects and measures the change in their condition since treatment start on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. (NCT02348606)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 4, and 8

Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score

"Change from Baseline ESS defined in terms of change from study baseline (prior to first dose in Period 1) to the end of each Treatment Period (Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4).~The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions, asking subjects how likely they would be to doze off or fall asleep in different situations. Responses range from 0 = would never doze to 3 = high chance of dozing. Higher scores represent greater severity of excessive sleepiness. The total score ranges from 0 - 24, with higher scores representing greater severity of excessive sleepiness." (NCT03037203)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT)

"Change from Baseline mean sleep latency (in minutes) on the MWT defined in terms of change from study baseline (prior to first dose in Period 1) to the end of each Treatment Period (Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4).~The MWT is the standard objective measure of an individual's ability to remain awake during the daytime in a darkened, quiet environment. MWT sleep latency ranges from 0 to 40 minutes, with higher scores indicated greater ability to stay awake." (NCT03037203)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Early Discontinuation

(NCT03037203)
Timeframe: Up to Day 35

"Number of Participants With a Score of Much Improved or Very Much Improved on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale (Response) at (Week 12) Using LOCF"

"The investigator -rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale is an assessment designed to allow investigators to rate the change of a participant's disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved, a score of 2 being much improved, a score of 3 being minimally improved, a score of 4 being no change, a score of 5 being minimally improved,a score of 6 being much worse, and a score of 7 being very much worse. Participants with a response of much improved or very much improved were classified as responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Change From Baseline in IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Sleep Adequacy, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep adequacy domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater adequacy. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Basline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Sleep Quantity, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep quantity domain were measured in time (number of hours of sleep each night). The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score at the End of Treatment (Week 12) for Participants With Pain at Baseline or the End of Week 12 Using LOCF

The Daily RLS pain score was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined study visits. The change from baseline was calculated as the End of Treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline (Day 1) value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score to Week 12 for Participants With a Baseline Pain Score of at Least 4 Using LOCF

The Average Daily RLS pain was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined visits. The change from baseline was calculated as the End of Treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline (Day 1) value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Daytime Somnolence Score, an Item on the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the daytime somnolence domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater daytime somnolence. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Overall Life-Impact Score of the RLS Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire at Week 12 Using LOCF

The Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific, participant-rated questionnaire that assesses the impact of RLS on daily life, emotional well-being, social life, and work life of the participants. The RLS-QoL Questionnaire is presented on a 0 (lowest possible score) to 100 (highest possible score) scale. It was completed at Day 1 and at the end of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Early Termination). (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Scale at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The Profile of Mood States (POMS) Brief Form contains 30 adjectives; each participant is asked to rate the degree to which each adjective describes themselves based on how they felt during the past week including the date on which the adjective was rated. The possible ratings range from 0 (Not all all) to 4 (Extremely). The Total Mood Disturbance Score (range of 0 to 120) is obtained by summing the values of six domains. Higher scores indicate a more negative mood disturbance. The POMS was completed at Baseline (Day 1), and at the end of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Early Termination)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disturbance Score, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep disturbance domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater impairment of sleep. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment (Week 12) in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment in Average Daily Total Sleep Time (Hours) Using LOCF

Average daily total sleep time was derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD; an instrument with separate components to be completed [self-reported] at bedtime and waketime) as the mean of non-missing total sleep time over the 7 days before each visit, where total sleep time = [(wake up time - lights out time) - time to fall asleep - time awake during the night] in hours. The change was calculated as the end of treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment in Average Daily Wake Time (Minutes) After Sleep Onset Using LOCF

Average daily wake time after sleep onset was derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) as the mean of non-missing total hours awake during the night after falling asleep over the 7 days before each visit. The change was calculated as the end of treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Week 1 in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and the End of Week 1

Number of Participants Classsified as Responders on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants Who Had an Onset of Response to Treatment at the End of Week 1 Based Upon the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I Using LOCF

"The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. Response was defined by an IRLS Rating Scale total score at the end of Week 1 < 15 and at least a 6-point reduction from the participant's Baseline score and an investigator-rated CGI-I response of much improved or very much improved." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Week 1

Number of Participants Who Indicated on the Mood Assessment That Their Mood Was Much Improved or Very Much Improved at Week 12 (End of Treatment) Using LOCF

The Mood Assessment is a non-disease-specific question surveying global change in a participant's overall mood. Participants were asked to rate their overall change in mood since the start of the study by choosing a score in a range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). The assessment was completed at Day 1 and the ends of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 or (Early Termination). (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants With a Rating of Excellent for the Overall Quality of Sleep in Past Week Measured by the Post-Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at the End of Treatment (Week 12) Using LOCF

"The Post-Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) was designed to evaluate overall sleep quality, ability to function, and RLS symptoms' interference with sleep over the past week. Participants were asked to rate overall sleep quality (as either Excellent, Reasonable, or Poor), ability to function, number of nights with RLS symptoms, number of nights awakened by RLS symptoms, and the number of hours spent awake due to RLS symptoms over the past week." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (Week 12)

Number of Total Responders to Treatment Based on the Investigator-Rated CGI of Improvement at the End of One Week of Treatment

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Week 1

The Time to Onset of the First Response to Treatment on the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I

The Response was defined by an IRLS Rating Scale total score at the end of Week 1 < 15 and at least a 6-point reduction from the participant's Baseline score and an investigator-rated CGI-I response of much improved or very much improved. The median time to onset is estimated using the product-limit estimation method. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Time to Onset of the First RLS Symptom From the 24-hour RLS Record Obtained at the End of Treatment (Week 12)

The time to onset of the first RLS symptoms from the 24-hour RLS Record is defined as the length of time from the start of the 24-hour assessment period (8:00 AM) to the time when 50% of participants experienced their first symptom. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Change From Baseline in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 by Baseline RLS Rating Scale Total Score Category (Baseline RLS Severity) Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Mean Change in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline at Week 12 by RLS Treatment History Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale Responders at Week 12 by RLS Treatment History Using LOCF

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Basline and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Responders to Treatment Based on the Participant-Rated CGI of Improvement at Week 1 and Week 12 (End of Treatment)

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 1 and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Responders With at Least 30% and 50% Improvement in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score Using LOCF

"The Mean Daily RLS pain was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined visits A Responder is a participant with a score of much improved or very much improved on the investigator rated CGI I Scale at the end of treatment (Week 12 using LOCF)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants Experiencing No RLS Symptoms in Each of the Seven 4-hour Periods From the 24-hour RLS Record at Week 12 (End of Treatment)

RLS severity ratings were summarized in 6 non-overlapping 4-hour periods beginning at 8 AM. A 4-hour period from 6 PM to 10 PM was also prospectively included to reflect the time frame when the most participants would experience their first symptoms of the day. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Reviews

9 reviews available for carbamates and Daytime Sleepiness

Trials

13 trials available for carbamates and Daytime Sleepiness

Other Studies

4 other studies available for carbamates and Daytime Sleepiness