Page last updated: 2024-10-16

carbamates and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

carbamates has been researched along with Becker Muscular Dystrophy in 9 studies

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, including seven clinical studies, was developed to explore the effect of covariates on givinostat PK."3.30Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of givinostat. ( Bettica, P; Cazzaniga, S; Del Bene, F; Fiorentini, F; Germani, M; Pellizzoni, C; Rocchetti, M, 2023)
"Treatment with Givinostat significantly increased the fraction of muscle tissue in the biopsies and reduced the amount of fibrotic tissue."2.82Histological effects of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. ( Bertini, E; Bettica, P; Brajkovic, S; Catteruccia, M; Comi, GP; D'Amico, A; D'Oria, V; De Nicolao, G; Gatti, B; Magri, F; Mercuri, E; Messina, S; Moggio, M; Pane, M; Petrini, S; Puri, PL; Rocchetti, M; Sivo, S; Vita, G; Vita, GL, 2016)
"Givinostat treatment increased maximal normalized strength to levels that were comparable to those of healthy mice in both DMD models."1.62The pan HDAC inhibitor Givinostat improves muscle function and histological parameters in two Duchenne muscular dystrophy murine models expressing different haplotypes of the LTBP4 gene. ( Crippa, L; Fossati, G; Leoni, F; Licandro, SA; Perego, R; Pomarico, R; Steinkühler, C, 2021)

Research

Studies (9)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's4 (44.44)24.3611
2020's5 (55.56)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Sandonà, M1
Cavioli, G1
Renzini, A1
Cedola, A1
Gigli, G1
Coletti, D1
McKinsey, TA1
Moresi, V1
Saccone, V3
Fiorentini, F2
Germani, M2
Del Bene, F2
Pellizzoni, C1
Cazzaniga, S1
Rocchetti, M4
Bettica, P4
Lavezzi, SM1
Petrini, S2
De Nicolao, G2
Xuan, W1
Khan, M1
Ashraf, M1
Giovarelli, M1
Zecchini, S1
Catarinella, G1
Moscheni, C1
Sartori, P1
Barbieri, C1
Roux-Biejat, P1
Napoli, A1
Vantaggiato, C1
Cervia, D1
Perrotta, C1
Clementi, E1
Latella, L1
De Palma, C1
Licandro, SA1
Crippa, L1
Pomarico, R1
Perego, R1
Fossati, G1
Leoni, F2
Steinkühler, C1
Consalvi, S2
Mozzetta, C2
Monzani, V1
Mascagni, P1
Puri, PL2
D'Oria, V1
D'Amico, A1
Catteruccia, M1
Pane, M1
Sivo, S1
Magri, F1
Brajkovic, S1
Messina, S1
Vita, GL1
Gatti, B1
Moggio, M1
Vita, G1
Comi, GP1
Bertini, E1
Mercuri, E1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Two-Part Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Effects on Histology and Different Clinical Parameters of Givinostat in Ambulant Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy[NCT01761292]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After 12 Months of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the 6-Minute Walk Test

"This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.~The 6-Minute Walk Test is a useful measure of functional capacity targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment.~The longer the walked distance the better the outcome." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Overall-24.6

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After 12 Months of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA)

"The NSAA, which is composed by 17 items, was graded, for each item, using the standard scorecard with each assessment rated as 0 - unable to achieve independently, 1 - modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 - normal with no obvious modification of activity.~The subscales scores are summed up to compute a total score, ranging from 0 to 34. The higher the total score, the better the outcome.~The mean Change From Baseline to EoS in NSAA total score is reported hereunder." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Overall-2.8

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After 12 Months of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL)

"The PUL (version 1.2) was used to assess the change in motor performance of the upper limb over time in patients with Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, from when they are still ambulant, until they loose all arm function when non-ambulant.~The revised version of the PUL included 22 items. These include one entry item to define the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into:~shoulder level (Question B to E; minimum score 0 and maximum score 16)~elbow level (Question F to N; minimum score 0 and maximum score 34)~distal level dimension (Question O to V; minimum score 0 and maximum score 24) The total score is calculated by the sum of all the scores of the three subscales (total score range: 0-74) (scores from Question A entry item did not contribute). For all items, the higher the score, the better the outcome." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Overall-0.2

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Cross Sectional Area (CSA)

This histological parameter was evaluated on the brachial biceps biopsies taken prior to the first dose of study drug and after 12 months of treatment with givinostat. (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionμm2 (Mean)
Overall865.269

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Number of Hypercontracted Fibers

This histological parameter was evaluated on the brachial biceps biopsies taken prior to the first dose of study drug and after 12 months of treatment with givinostat. The number of fibers is calculated per microscopic field (20x). (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 12 months

Interventionnumber of fibers (Mean)
Overall-1.204

Change From Baseline to Part 2 in the Value of Muscle Fiber Area (MFA) % Comparing the Histology Biopsies Before and After 12 Months of Treatment With Givinostat.

"The primary endpoint was the change in histology comparing the brachial biceps biopsies before and after ≥12 months of treatment with Givinostat.~Muscle biopsies: A first brachial biceps biopsy (baseline) was taken prior to the first dose of study drug. A second brachial biceps biopsy was taken at Visit 10 (12 months) from the opposite arm.~The muscle biopsy samples from the biceps muscle were collected by open biopsy. The minimum amount of muscle tissue required was a piece of muscle of at least 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: After12 months of treatment

Interventionpercentage change (Median)
Overall12.76

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After 24 (Extension 1), 36 (Extension 2), and 52 Months (Extension 3) of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA)

"The NSAA, which is composed by 17 items, was graded, for each item, using the standard scorecard with each assessment rated as 0 - unable to achieve independently, 1 - modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 - normal with no obvious modification of activity.~The subscales scores are summed up to compute a total score, ranging from 0 to 34. The higher the total score, the better the outcome.~The mean Change From Baseline to EoS in NSAA total score is reported hereunder." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 24, 36, and 52 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Extension 1Extension 2Extension 3
Overall-5.2-7.4-15.2

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After 24 (Extension 1), 36 (Extension 2), and 52 Months (Extension 3) of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL)

"The PUL (version 1.2) was used to assess the change in motor performance of the upper limb over time in patients with Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, from when they are still ambulant, until they loose all arm function when non-ambulant.~The revised version of the PUL included 22 items taking. These include one entry item to define the starting functional level, and 21 items subdivided into:~shoulder level (Question B to E; minimum score 0 and maximum score 16)~elbow level (Question F to N; minimum score 0 and maximum score 34)~distal level dimension (Question O to V; minimum score 0 and maximum score 24) The total score is calculated by the sum of all the scores of the three subscales (total score range: 0-74) (scores from Question A entry item did not contribute). For all items, the higher the score, the better the outcome." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 24, 36, and 52 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Extension 1Extension 2Extension 3
Overall-0.2-0.2-4.4

Change From Baseline in Muscular Function After After 24 (Extension 1), 36 (Extension 2), and 52 Months (Extension 3) of Treatment With Givinostat at the Selected Daily Dose Based on the 6-Minute Walk Test

"This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.~The 6-Minute Walk Test is a useful measure of functional capacity targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment.~The longer the walked distance the better the outcome." (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: At 24, 36, and 52 months

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Extension 1Extension 2Extension 3
Overall-80.0-127.0-287.8

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Fibrosis, Necrosis, Fatty Replacement

These histological parameters were evaluated on the brachial biceps biopsies taken prior to the first dose of study drug and after 12 months of treatment with givinostat. (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: After 12 months

Interventionpercentage of total area (Mean)
Total fibrosisPerimysial fibrosisEndomysial fibrosisFatty replacementNecrosis
Baseline-12.640-7.585-5.056-0.302-0.964

Number of Children Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Type and Severity of TEAEs

Summary of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Reporting from Baseline to the End of Extension 3 (Month 52). In the analysis were included: Any TEAE, Any treatment-related TEAE, Any mild or moderate or severe TEAE, Any life-threatening or disabling TEAE, Any TEAE resulting in death, any serious adverse event, and Any TEAE resulting in study discontinuation. (NCT01761292)
Timeframe: Part 1, Part 2, and Extensions 1, 2, and 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsAny treatment-related TEAEAny mild TEAEAny moderate TEAEAny severe TEAEAny life-threatening or disabling TEAEAnt TEAE resulting in deathAny SAEAny TEAE resulting in study discontinuation
Overall2020201691081

Reviews

2 reviews available for carbamates and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

ArticleYear
Histone Deacetylases: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications for Muscular Dystrophies.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2023, Feb-21, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Carbamates; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Histone Deacetylases; Humans; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscular

2023
Histone deacetylase inhibitors: a potential epigenetic treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
    Epigenomics, 2014, Volume: 6, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetylation; Animals; Carbamates; Cell Differentiation; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical

2014

Trials

3 trials available for carbamates and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

ArticleYear
Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of givinostat.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2023, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Carbamates; Child; Humans; Male; Models, Biological; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Weight Gain

2023
Assessing drug effect from distributional data: A population approach with application to Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy treatment.
    Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2019, Volume: 178

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Algorithms; Biopsy; Carbamates; Child; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Da

2019
Histological effects of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
    Neuromuscular disorders : NMD, 2016, Volume: 26, Issue:10

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Carbamates; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Histone Deacetylase In

2016

Other Studies

4 other studies available for carbamates and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

ArticleYear
Pluripotent stem cell-induced skeletal muscle progenitor cells with givinostat promote myoangiogenesis and restore dystrophin in injured Duchenne dystrophic muscle.
    Stem cell research & therapy, 2021, 02-12, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Carbamates; Dystrophin; Humans; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Mice; Mice, Inbred mdx; Mic

2021
Givinostat as metabolic enhancer reverting mitochondrial biogenesis deficit in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
    Pharmacological research, 2021, Volume: 170

    Topics: Acetylation; Animals; Carbamates; Disease Models, Animal; Energy Metabolism; Epigenesis, Genetic; Hi

2021
The pan HDAC inhibitor Givinostat improves muscle function and histological parameters in two Duchenne muscular dystrophy murine models expressing different haplotypes of the LTBP4 gene.
    Skeletal muscle, 2021, 07-22, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Carbamates; Disease Models, Animal; Haplotypes; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Lat

2021
Preclinical studies in the mdx mouse model of duchenne muscular dystrophy with the histone deacetylase inhibitor givinostat.
    Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2013, May-20, Volume: 19

    Topics: Animals; Carbamates; Cells, Cultured; Exercise Test; Fibrosis; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Human

2013