cannabidiol and Acute-Pain

Neuropathic pain is experienced due to injury to the nerves, underlying disease conditions or toxicity induced by chemotherapeutics. Multiple factors can contribute to neuropathic pain such as central nervous system (CNS)-related autoimmune and metabolic disorders, nerve injury, multiple sclerosis and diabetes. Hence, development of pharmacological interventions to reduce the drawbacks of existing chemotherapeutics and counter neuropathic pain is an urgent unmet clinical need. Cannabinoid treatment has been reported to be beneficial for several disease conditions including neuropathic pain. Cannabinoids act by inhibiting the release of neurotransmitters from presynaptic nerve endings, modulating the excitation of postsynaptic neurons, activating descending inhibitory pain pathways, reducing neural inflammation and oxidative stress and also correcting autophagy defects. This review provides insights on the various preclinical and clinical therapeutic applications of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabinol (CBN) in various diseases and the ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of chronic and acute pain with cannabinoids. Pharmacological and genetic experimental strategies have well demonstrated the potential neuroprotective effects of cannabinoids and also elaborated their mechanism of action for the therapy of neuropathic pain.

Topics: Acute Pain; Cannabidiol; Cannabinoids; Cannabinol; Humans; Neuralgia

Topics: Acute Pain; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Cannabidiol; Cannabinoids; Chronic Pain; Dronabinol; Humans; Marijuana Abuse; Medical Marijuana; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Psychomotor Performance; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Opioids in general and remifentanil in particular can induce hyperalgesia. Preclinical data suggest that cannabidiol might have the capacity to reduce opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Thus, we investigated the effect of oral cannabidiol on OIH in healthy volunteers using an established pain model. Twenty-four healthy participants were included in this randomized, double-blinded, crossover study and received either a 1600-mg single-dose oral cannabidiol or placebo. Hyperalgesia, allodynia, and pain were induced by intracutaneous electrical stimulation. To provoke OIH, participants recieved an infusion of 0.1 µg/kg/min remifentanil over a time frame of 30 minutes, starting 100 minutes after oral cannabidiol ingestion. The primary outcome was the area of hyperalgesia (in square centimetres) up to 60 minutes after remifentanil administration. The area of allodynia (in square centimetres) and pain (numeric rating scale) were also assessed.Cannabidiol had no significant effect on hyperalgesia, allodynia, or pain at any time point of measurement compared with placebo. The area of hyperalgesia after remifentanil administration significantly increased compared with baseline (17.0 cm 2 [8.1-28.7] vs 25.3 cm 2 [15.1-39.6]; P = 0.013). Mean cannabidiol blood levels were 4.1 ± 3.0 µg/L (mean ± SD) at 130 minutes after ingestion and were 8.2 μg/L ± 6.9 µg/L (mean ± SD) at 200 minutes. Cannabidiol was well tolerated. We conclude that a high single-oral dose of 1600-mg cannabidiol is not effective in reducing OIH. Before excluding an effect of cannabidiol on OIH, research should focus on drug formulations enabling higher cannabidiol concentrations.

Topics: Acute Pain; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Cannabidiol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Nociceptive Pain; Piperidines; Remifentanil

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the analgesic potential of cannabidiol (CBD). Those suggesting an effect on pain-processing receptors have brought CBD back into focus. This study assessed the effect of CBD on acute pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia compared with placebo. Twenty healthy volunteers were included in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study assessing pain intensities (using numeric rating scale), secondary hyperalgesia (von Frey filament), and allodynia (dry cotton swab) in a well-established acute pain model with intradermal electrical stimulation. The authors compared the effect of 800-mg orally administered CBD on pain compared with placebo. They further examined the effect on hyperalgesia and allodynia. Cannabidiol whole blood levels were also measured. Pain ratings (mean ± SD) did not differ significantly after CBD application compared with placebo (5.2 ± 0.7 vs 5.3 ± 0.7, P-value 0.928), neither did the areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia differ significantly after CBD application compared with placebo (hyperalgesia 23.9 ± 19.2 cm2 vs 27.4 ± 17.0 cm2, P-value 0.597; allodynia 16.6 ± 13.1 cm2 vs 17.3 ± 14.1 cm2, P-value 0.884). The CBD whole blood level (median, first to third quartile) was 2.0 µg/L (1.5-5.1) 60 minutes and 5.0 µg/L (4.0-10.4) 130 minutes after CBD application. Although the oral application of 800-mg CBD failed to show a significant effect, it is important to focus future research on different dosing, routes of administration, and CBD as a part of multimodal treatment strategies before negating its effects on acute pain.

Topics: Acute Pain; Adult; Cannabidiol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Nociceptive Pain

To assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of single-dose oral cannabidiol (CBD) as an adjunct to standard care for patients presenting to an emergency department with acute low back pain.. Randomised, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.. The tertiary emergency department of Austin Hospital, Melbourne.. Patients who presented with acute, non-traumatic low back pain between 21 May 2018 and 13 June 2019.. One hundred eligible patients were randomised to receiving 400 mg CBD or placebo in addition to standard emergency department analgesic medication.. Pain score two hours after administration of study agent, on a verbal numerical pain scale (range, 0-10). Secondary outcomes were length of stay, need for rescue analgesia, and adverse events.. The median age of the 100 participants was 47 years (IQR, 34-60 years); 44 were women. Mean pain scores at two hours were similar for the CBD (6.2 points; 95% CI, 5.5-6.9 points) and placebo groups (5.8 points; 95% CI, 5.1-6.6 points; absolute difference, -0.3 points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.6 points). The median length of stay was 9.0 hours (IQR, 7.4-12 hours) for the CBD group and 8.5 hours (IQR, 6.5-21 hours) for the placebo group. Oxycodone use during the four hours preceding and the four hours after receiving CBD or placebo was similar for the two groups, as were reported side effects.. CBD was not superior to placebo as an adjunct medication for relieving acute non-traumatic low back pain in the emergency department.. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000487213 (prospective).

Topics: Acetaminophen; Acute Pain; Administration, Oral; Adult; Australia; Cannabidiol; Double-Blind Method; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Ibuprofen; Length of Stay; Low Back Pain; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Placebos; Tertiary Care Centers; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies suggest that cannabidiol (CBD) may potentiate or antagonize Δ. In Experiment 1, CBD (0, 10 or 30mg/kg) was administered 15min before THC (0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6 or 10mg/kg), and rats were tested for antinociception and locomotion 15-360min post-THC injection. In Experiments 2 and 3, CBD (30mg/kg) was administered 13h or 15min before THC (1.8mg/kg); rats were tested for antinociception and locomotion 30-480min post-THC injection (Experiment 2), or serum samples were taken 30-360min post-THC injection to examine CBD modulation of THC metabolism (Experiment 3).. In Experiment 1, CBD alone produced no antinociceptive effects, while enhancing THC-induced paw pressure but not tail withdrawal antinociception 4-6h post-THC injection. CBD alone increased locomotor activity at 6h post-injection, but enhanced THC-induced hypolocomotion 4-6h post-THC injection, at lower THC doses. There were no sex differences in CBD-THC interactions. In Experiments 2 and 3, CBD did not significantly enhance THC's effects when CBD was administered 13h or 15min before THC; however, CBD inhibited THC metabolism, and this effect was greater in females than males.. These results suggest that CBD may enhance THC's antinociceptive and hypolocomotive effects, primarily prolonging THC's duration of action; however, these effects were small and inconsistent across experiments. CBD inhibition of THC metabolism as well other mechanisms likely contribute to CBD-THC interactions on behavior.

Topics: Acute Pain; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Cannabidiol; Dronabinol; Drug Interactions; Female; Locomotion; Male; Rats; Sex Factors

Cannabinoid and opioid agonists can display overlapping behavioral effects and the combination of these agonists is known to produce enhanced antinociception in several rodent models of acute and chronic pain. The present study investigated the antinociceptive effects of the nonpsychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD) and the µ-opioid agonist morphine, both alone and in combination, using three behavioral models in mice, to test the hypothesis that combinations of morphine and CBD would produce synergistic effects. The effects of morphine, CBD, and morphine/CBD combinations were assessed in the following assays: (a) acetic acid-stimulated stretching; (b) acetic acid-decreased operant responding for palatable food; and (c) hot plate thermal nociception. Morphine alone produced antinociceptive effects in all three models of acute nociception, whereas CBD alone produced antinociception only in the acetic acid-stimulated stretching assay. The nature of the interactions between morphine and CBD combinations were assessed quantitatively based on the principle of dose equivalence. Combinations of CBD and morphine produced synergistic effects in reversing acetic acid-stimulated stretching behavior, but subadditive effects in the hot plate thermal nociceptive assay and the acetic acid-decreased operant responding for palatable food assay. These results suggest that distinct mechanisms of action underlie the interactions between CBD and morphine in the three different behavioral assays and that the choice of appropriate combination therapies for the treatment of acute pain conditions may depend on the underlying pain type and stimulus modality.

Topics: Acetic Acid; Acute Pain; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cannabidiol; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Synergism; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Morphine