cangrelor and Hemorrhage

In patients who received a cardiac stent, practice guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, an urgent procedure may be required necessitating interruption of DAPT. Intravenous cangrelor was previously shown to be an alternative due its short-half life and quick onset/offset.. To determine the safety and effectiveness of cangrelor bridging for patients undergoing invasive procedures in a veteran population.. Retrospective cohort of patients from Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the VA North Texas Health Care Systems who underwent perioperative cangrelor bridging. The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. The secondary outcome was a composite of nonfatal stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), mortality, and unplanned revascularization within 30 days. A narrative review was also performed to summarize cangrelor bridging for noncardiac invasive procedure.. There were 41 patients that met the eligibility criteria. Patients were predominantly Caucasian (57.5%) men with a median age of 70 years. The median duration on cangrelor bridging was 2.6 days with 11 and 30 patients undergoing cardiac and noncardiac invasive procedures, respectively. Nine patients (22%) had a bleeding event of which 8 were minor. One was severe due to significant iliopsoas hematoma following drain placement. All bleeding events occurred postoperatively except for 2 perioperative events that occurred during orthopedic procedures. Ischemic events up to 30 days occurred in 3 patients (7.3%) which consisted of 1 (2.4%) nonfatal MI requiring revascularization and 2 (4.9%) deaths, 1 of which was sudden cardiac.. This study suggests that cangrelor bridging may be a reasonable alternative to holding oral P2Y12 inhibitors in patients requiring interruption of antiplatelet therapy for an urgent surgery/invasive procedure.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticlopidine

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitors prevents ischemic events in patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). However, oral administration of antiplatelet drugs cause delay of onset of platelet inhibition in P2Y12-inhibitor naïve patients. Cangrelor is a novel P2Y12-receptor inhibitor which is administrated intravenously and thus allows immediate antiplatelet inhibition during PCI. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics with fast onset of platelet inhibition and very short plasma half-life it allows effective and controllable periprocedural platelet inhibition. It could reduce short-term ischemic events in large randomized clinical trials. The present article reviews the available evidence and application on cangrelor use in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

It is estimated that in the United States, each year, approximately 620,000 persons will experience an acute coronary syndrome and approximately 70% of these will have non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular disease still accounts for 1 of every 3 deaths in the United States, and there is an urgent need to improve the prognosis of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular mortality and ischemic complications are common after acute coronary syndrome, and the advent of newer antithrombotic therapies has reduced ischemic complications, but at the expense of greater bleeding. The new antithrombotic agents also raise the challenge of choosing between multiple potential therapeutic combinations to minimize recurrent ischemia without a concomitant increase in bleeding, a decision that often varies according to an individual patient's relative propensity for ischemia versus hemorrhage. In this review, we will synthesize the available information to arm health care providers with the contemporary knowledge on antithrombotic therapy and individualize treatment decisions.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Polymorphism, Genetic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes or with recent coronary stents implantation. P2Y12 receptor antagonists have shown to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events among these patients, at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding. Cangrelor is a novel, intravenous, short-acting, reversible platelet P2Y12 inhibitor, which has been evaluated for the treatment of arterial thrombosis.. Studies on the pharmacological characteristics of cangrelor and clinical trials were retrieved by a PubMed literature search.. Cangrelor has been tested in patients with coronary artery diseases undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and as bridging therapy for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. The rapid peak of action allows a fast and complete inhibition of platelet aggregation; the rapid offset is advantageous in case of bleeding complications; and finally, the intravenous administration also makes this drug suitable for patients unable to consume oral medications. Unfortunately, the large clinical trials evaluating cangrelor in percutaneous coronary intervention did not show superiority to the standard antiplatelet therapy, and its future use in this setting still needs to be better assessed. Conversely, when used as bridging therapy to coronary artery bypass graft, cangrelor showed promising results.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Thrombosis

Cangrelor (Kengrexal(®), Kengreal(™)) is an intravenously administered P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. It is direct-acting and reversible, with a very rapid onset and offset of action. The randomized, double-blind, multinational, phase III CHAMPION PHOENIX trial compared the efficacy of intravenous cangrelor with that of oral clopidogrel in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable angina pectoris, a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). The primary composite efficacy endpoint of death from any cause, MI, ischaemia-drive revascularization or stent thrombosis in the 48 h following randomization occurred in significantly fewer cangrelor than clopidogrel recipients. The rate of severe or life-threatening non-coronary artery bypass graft-related, GUSTO-defined bleeding at 48 h did not significantly differ between cangrelor and clopidogrel recipients. In conclusion, intravenous cangrelor is an important new option for use in patients undergoing PCI who have not been treated with oral P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Blood Platelets; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Cangrelor is a new parenteral adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor inhibitor with rapid, profound and reversible inhibition of platelet activity. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of this new agent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases from the inception through April 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cangrelor with control (clopidogrel/placebo) were selected. We used the random-effects models to calculate the risk ratio. The primary efficacy outcome was risk of myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding at 48 h. Three RCTs included a total of 25,107 participants. Effects of Cangrelor were not different against comparators for myocardial infarction (MI) (Risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.13) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36-1.43). However, cangrelor significantly reduced the risk of ischemia-driven revascularization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.98), stent thrombosis (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.82) and Q wave MI (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.92) without causing extra major bleeding (Thrombolysis in Myocardial infarction criteria) and severe or life-threatening bleeding (Global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries criteria). Separate analysis against only clopidogrel also showed similar findings except Q wave MI outcome. Use of cangrelor during PCI might reduce the risk of ischemia-driven revascularization and stent thrombosis, without causing extra major bleeding.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Models, Biological; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; PubMed; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thrombosis

The dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel has been the mainstay of both acute and chronic phase coronary artery disease, reducing importantly the risk of adverse events. Despite a correct compliance, a non-negligible rate of adverse events still happens. New compounds, with improved properties, are now clinically available (such as prasugrel or ticagrelor) or under advanced development. The aim of the present review is the description of these new compounds, particularly prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Proteinase-Activated; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

New P2Y12 inhibitors can be classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous drugs (cangrelor and elinogrel). These P2Y12 inhibitors might be superior to clopidogrel for reducing ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new oral or intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients.. Twelve randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two subgroup analyses of included studies on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included. The database consisted of 82,784 patients, with 43,875 (53%) on new oral P2Y12 inhibitors and 38909 (47%) on intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACEs (odds ratio: 0.85, p<0.0001 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.04 for STEMI) and all-cause death (OR: 0.88, p=0.04 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.01 for STEMI). Among new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors, only cangrelor significantly decreased the risk of MACEs. An increase in TIMI major bleeding was observed only by prasugrel among the new P2Y12 inhibitors.. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors reduce ischemic events, but there is no obvious increase in major bleeding in patients with CAD, and the risk/benefit ratio is particularly favorable for STEMI patients. Moreover, only cangrelor is beneficial for ischemic events in patients on new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Effective antagonism of the P2Y12 platelet receptor is central to the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, especially in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting. According to consensus guidelines, early revascularization and intensive antiplatelet therapy are key to reducing the complications that arise from myocardial ischaemia and the recurrence of cardiovascular events. Until recently, clopidogrel was the key P2Y12 antagonist advocated, but due to several limitations as an antiplatelet agent, newer drugs with more predictable, rapid and potent effects have been developed. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are now the recommended first-line agents in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation ACS and ST-segment elevation ACS, due to large-scale randomized trials that demonstrated net clinical benefit of these agents over clopidogrel, as stated in the European guidelines. Although no study has directly compared the two agents, analysis of the data to date suggests that certain patient types, such as diabetics, those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or renal failure and the elderly may have a better outcome with one agent over the other. Further studies are needed to confirm these differences and answer pending questions regarding the use of these drugs to optimize efficacy while minimizing adverse events, such as bleeding. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current P2Y12 receptor antagonists in the treatment of ACS, with a focus on issues of appropriate agent selection, timing of treatment, bleeding risk and the future role of personalized treatment using platelet function and genetic testing.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Complications; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Renal Insufficiency; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The activation and aggregation of platelets at sites of vascular injury or near to implanted stent are pivotal in the development of thrombotic events during and after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). For that reason, an exclusively oral dual antiplatelet treatment regimen with platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonists in addition to the cyclooxygenase inhibitor aspirin has become the cornerstone of treatment in that contest. However, every trial underlines the same problem: if maximizing antiplatelet therapy significantly attenuates ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, on the other side it may also increase bleeding phenomena. These limitations have prompted a search for novel antiplatelet agents with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio. Moreover, an early onset of action is desirable during PCI and an early offset after bleeding events. Two novel antiplatelet agents, Cangrelor and Elinogrel, are available in intravenous form (Elinogrel also in oral form) and expand this context. Recent trials have tested them against Clopidogrel regarding efficacy and safety outcomes.This review aimed at providing an overview on intravenous emerging compounds and recent patents in the setting of ACS and PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patents as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Sulfonamides

Cangrelor is a potent, rapid-acting, reversible intravenous platelet inhibitor that was tested for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in three large, double-blind, randomised trials. We did a pooled analysis of data from three trials that assessed the effectiveness of cangrelor against either clopidogrel or placebo in PCI.. This prespecified, pooled analysis of patient-level data from three trials (CHAMPION-PCI, CHAMPION-PLATFORM, and CHAMPION-PHOENIX) compared cangrelor with control (clopidogrel or placebo) for prevention of thrombotic complications during and after PCI. Trial participants were patients undergoing PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (11.6%), non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (57.4%), and stable coronary artery disease (31.0%). Efficacy was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population of 24,910 patients, with a prespecified primary efficacy composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven revascularisation, or stent thrombosis at 48 h. The primary safety outcome was non-coronary artery bypass graft-related GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) severe or life-threatening bleeding at 48 h.. Cangrelor reduced the odds of the primary outcome by 19% (3.8% for cangrelor vs 4.7% for control; odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.91, p=0.0007), and stent thrombosis by 41% (0.5% vs 0.8%, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80, p=0.0008). Cangrelor reduced the odds of the secondary triple composite (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven revascularisation at 48 h) by 19% (3.6% vs 4.4%, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p=0.0014). Efficacy outcomes were consistent across the trials and main patient subsets. These benefits were maintained at 30 days. There was no difference in the primary safety outcome (0.2% in both groups), in GUSTO moderate bleeding (0.6% vs 0.4%), or in transfusion (0.7% vs 0.6%), but cangrelor increased GUSTO mild bleeding (16.8% vs 13.0%, p<0.0001).. Compared with control (clopidogrel or placebo), cangrelor reduced PCI periprocedural thrombotic complications, at the expense of increased bleeding.. The Medicines Company.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Cause of Death; Coronary Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Aggressive antiplatelet strategies unquestionably cause extra hemorrhagic risks. Bleeding episodes are associated with poor outcomes including increased mortality. However, lack of uniform reporting and adjudication of bleeding events might prevent objective evaluation of the efficacy/safety profile of antithrombotic agents.. We analyzed the bleeding rates by several previously used bleeding scales (TIMI, GUSTO, ACUITY, and BARC) after cangrelor in recent head-to-head randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs).. Data for meta-analyses were pooled from 3 RCTs (CHAMPION-PLATFORM, CHAMPION-PCI and CHAMPION-PHOENIX) including 25,106 patients. In addition, the bleeding risks were also assessed from the small (n=210) BRIDGE RCT. Cangrelor caused a significantly increased risk for major bleeding at 48 h according to the ACUITY scale (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.32-1.72, p<0.00001); however, this impact was less prominent according to less sensitive bleeding scales (GUSTO severe: RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.70-2.11, p=0.49; TIMI major: RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.59-1.68, p=0.99). There was also an obvious trend towards an increased risk for any transfusions (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.97-1.77, p=0.08) and TIMI major+minor bleeding events (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.96-1.76, p=0.09).. Cangrelor on top of aspirin or/and clopidogrel increases the risk for early bleeding events after PCI; however, it largely depends on the bleeding definition used, and how this excess risk of bleeding was captured. The bleeding hazard needs to be verified in the ongoing FDA secondary cangrelor review.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

Inhibiting platelet function is a key therapeutic principle in cardiology because platelets play a pivotal role in triggering cardiovascular events. In addition to acetylsalicylic acid, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, ADP-receptor blockers are frequently used for anti-platelet therapy. This therapy does not abolish platelet activation and aggregation. Platelets may still be activated by alternative routes such as the thrombin receptor-mediated pathway. New, more potent inhibitors of platelet function continue to lower the risk of ischaemic events but several trials and clinical registries have also shown that this advantage was frequently offset by an increased risk of bleeding complications. As a consequence, the individual risk of ischaemia and bleeding of a patient must be taken into consideration to select the platelet inhibitor offering the best benefit-risk ratio. Modern laboratory diagnostics may help to achieve this goal by complementing functional platelet tests with pharmacogenomic analyses consistent with the idea of "personalized medicine".

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

P2Y12, one of the two platelet receptors for adenosine diphosphate (ADP), plays a central role in platelet function. Defects of P2Y12 should be suspected when ADP, even at high concentrations (≥10 µM), is unable to induce full, irreversible platelet aggregation. Patients with congenital P2Y12 defects display a mild-to-moderate bleeding diathesis of variable severity, characterised by mucocutaneous bleeding and excessive post-surgical and post-traumatic blood loss. Drugs that inhibit P2Y12 are potent antithrombotic drugs, attesting the central role played by P2Y12 in platelet thrombus formation. Clopidogrel, the most widely used drug that inhibits P2Y12, is effective both in monotherapy and in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Its most important drawback is the inability to inhibit adequately P2Y12-dependent platelet function in about 1/3 of patients, at the recommended therapeutic doses. The incidence of bleeding events is similar in ASA-treated and clopidogrel-treated patients; however, the combination of ASA and clopidogrel causes more bleeding than each drug in monotherapy. Compared to clopidogrel, new drugs inhibiting P2Y12, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, decrease the risk of cardiovascular events and increase the risk of bleeding complications, because they adequately inhibit P2Y12-dependent platelet function in the vast majority of treated patients.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Monophosphate; Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Quinazolinones; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Thienopyridines have become the cornerstone of treatment of percutaneous coronary intervention although no survival benefit has ever been shown with clopidogrel despite increasing loading doses. Newly developed P2Y(12) inhibitors are more potent, more predictable and have a faster onset of action than clopidogrel, characteristics that make them particularly attractive for high-risk PCI. Four new P2Y(12) inhibitors have been tested each of them having particular individual properties. Prasugrel is an oral prodrug leading to irreversible blockade of the P2Y(12) receptor and is approved worldwide for ACS PCI. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y(12) receptor with potentially more pleiotropic effects. Cangrelor is an intravenous direct and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y(12) receptor providing the highest level of inhibition and elinogrel is an intravenous and oral P2Y(12) antagonist with a direct and reversible action. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor, opposed to clopidogrel, have shown that stronger P2Y(12) inhibition led respectively to significant 19 % and 16 % relative risk reduction of a similar primary endpoint combining cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Both drugs showed a significant 0.6 % absolute excess of TIMI major bleeding not related to CABG surgery. The effect of these new compounds is prompt, predictable and powerful as compared to clopidogrel. Their net benefit is particularly marked in PCI for STEMI patients, in which there is no significant increase in major bleeding when compared with clopidogrel. However, because in clinical trials patients perceived to be at higher risk for bleeding usually are excluded, the risk of major and even fatal bleeding might even be higher in a "real-world" setting i.e. in the elderly patient with comorbidities.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Management; Drug Resistance; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Reperfusion; Myocardial Revascularization; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Antiplatelet agents play an essential role in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines are a class of drugs that function via inhibition of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 platelet receptors. Currently, clopidogrel, a second generation thienopyridine, is the main drug of choice and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is administered orally for the treatment of ACS. Clopidogrel, is a pro-drug that needs to be metabolized in the liver and intestines to form active metabolites. Prasugrel, a third generation thienopyridine, was approved for use in Europe in February 2009, and is currently available in the United Kingdom. All thienopyridines however, have pharmacological limitations that lead to a search for more effective non-thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitors. Promising results have been reported with ticagrelor, an oral first reversible, direct-acting inhibitor of the P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor is the first oral P2Y12 receptor binding antagonist that does not require metabolic activation. Furthermore, ticagrelor has at last 1 active metabolite, which has very similar pharmacokinetics to the parent compound. Therefore, ticagrelor has more rapid onset and more pronounced platelet inhibition than other antiplatelet agents. The safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in ACS patient has been recently evaluated by the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel had a significantly greater reduction in the death rate from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke without major bleeding. There was however, an increase in non-procedure related bleeding, dyspnoea and ventricular pauses in the first week of treatment. Further studies on new antiplatelet agents are needed to establish a new "gold standard" antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Biotransformation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lactones; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

In randomized trials, cangrelor reduced periprocedural ischemic events related to percutaneous coronary intervention without increasing GUSTO severe bleeding. However, some antiplatelet agents have shown a differential treatment effect by body mass index (BMI).. Patients from the 3 CHAMPION trials (Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition) who were randomized to cangrelor versus clopidogrel during percutaneous coronary intervention were stratified by BMI. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 48 hours. The principal safety outcome was GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding at 48 hours, although more sensitive bleeding measures such as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding were also assessed. We examined obese patients (defined as BMI≥30) versus nonobese patients.. Cangrelor at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention is effective and safe in obese and nonobese patients. There was no difference in short-term efficacy between obese and nonobese patients. Periprocedural cangrelor is an effective and safe antiplatelet agent, irrespective of BMI.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01156571, NCT00385138, NCT00305162.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Obesity; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Despite improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) and bleeding complications occur and are prognostically important. These have not been included in prior economic studies.. PHOENIX ECONOMICS was a substudy of the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial, evaluating cangrelor during PCI. Hospital bills were reviewed from 1,171 patients enrolled at 22 of 63 US sites. Costs were estimated using standard methods including resource-based accounting, hospital billing data, and the Medicare fee schedule. Bleeding and IPTE, defined as abrupt vessel closure (transient or sustained), new/suspected thrombus, new clot on wire/catheter, no reflow, side-branch occlusion, procedural stent thrombosis or urgent need for CABG were identified. Costs were calculated according to whether a complication occurred and type of event. Multivariate analyses were used to estimate the incremental costs of IPTE and postprocedural events.. IPTE occurred in 4.3% and were associated with higher catheterization laboratory and overall index hospitalization costs by $2,734 (95%CI $1,117, $4,351; P = 0.001) and $6,354 (95% CI $4,122, $8,586; P < 0.001), respectively. IPTE were associated with MI (35.4% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.001), out-of-laboratory stent thrombosis (4.2% vs. 0.1%; 0 = 0.005), ischemia driven revascularization (12.5% vs. 0.3%; P < 0.001), but not mortality (2.1% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.12) vs. no procedural thrombotic complication. By comparison, ACUITY minor bleeding increased hospitalization cost by $1,416 (95%CI = 312, $2,519; P = 0.012). ACUITY major bleeding increased cost of hospitalization by $7,894 (95%CI $4,154, $11,635; P < 0.001).. IPTE and bleeding complications, though infrequent, are associated with substantial increased cost. These complications should be collected in economic assessments of PCI.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Costs; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Costs; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

In the context of contemporary pharmacotherapy, optimal antiplatelet management with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well established.. To compare the ischemic and bleeding risks associated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) and a potent P2Y12 antagonist, cangrelor, in patients undergoing PCI.. An exploratory analysis of pooled patient-level data from the 3 phase 3 Cangrelor vs Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION PCI, CHAMPION PLATFORM, and CHAMPION PHOENIX) trials of patients undergoing elective or nonelective PCI. The participants included 10 929 patients assigned to cangrelor but not receiving GPIs (cangrelor alone) and 1211 patients assigned to clopidogrel (or placebo) and receiving routine GPIs (clopidogrel-GPI). Patients requiring bailout or rescue GPI therapy were excluded. To account for risk imbalances, 1:1 propensity score matching based on 16 baseline clinical variables yielded 1021 unique matched pairs. The present study's data analysis was conducted from October 28, 2015, to August 6, 2016.. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 hours. Safety was assessed by 3 validated bleeding scales (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries [GUSTO], Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI], and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage) and requirement for blood transfusions.. Of the 12 140 patients included in the analysis, 8779 were men (72.3%), and the mean (SD) age was 63.2 (11.3) years. Patients in the clopidogrel-GPI group were more likely to be male (75.6% vs 71.9%), younger (median, 60 [range, 23-91] years vs 64 [range, 26-95] years), enrolled from the United States (77.9% vs 40.0%), and present with an acute coronary syndrome, but they had lower comorbid disease burden and were less likely to receive bivalirudin (8.8% vs 27.3%). In the matched cohorts, the rates of the primary efficacy end point were not significantly different between the cangrelor alone and clopidogrel-GPI groups (2.6% vs 3.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.32). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower rates of GUSTO-defined severe/life-threatening bleeding with cangrelor alone compared with clopidogrel-GPI (0.3% vs 0.7%; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.11-1.66). Rates of TIMI-defined major or minor bleeding were significantly lower in patients treated with cangrelor alone (0.7% vs 2.4%; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.68).. Based on a pooled analysis from the 3 phase 3 CHAMPION trials, cangrelor alone was associated with similar ischemic risk and lower risk-adjusted bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel-GPIs.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00305162, NCT00385138, and NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; United States

To assess whether the use of the femoral or radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) interacted with the efficacy and safety of cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor, in CHAMPION PHOENIX.. A total of 11 145 patients were randomly assigned in a double-dummy, double-blind manner either to a cangrelor bolus and 2-h infusion or to clopidogrel at the time of PCI. The primary endpoint, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis, and the primary safety endpoint, Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) defined severe bleeding, were evaluated at 48 h. Of the patients undergoing PCI and receiving study drug treatment, a total of 8064 (74%) and 2855 (26%) patients underwent femoral or radial PCI, respectively. Among the femoral cohort, the primary endpoint rate was 4.8% with cangrelor vs. 6.0% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.79 [0.65-0.96]); among the radial cohort, the primary endpoint was 4.4% with cangrelor vs. 5.7% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 0.76 [0.54-1.06]), P-interaction 0.83. The rate of GUSTO severe bleeding in the femoral cohort was 0.2% with cangrelor vs. 0.1% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 1.73 [0.51-5.93]). Among the radial cohort, the rate of GUSTO severe bleeding was 0.1% with cangrelor vs. 0.1% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 1.02 [0.14-7.28]), P-interaction 0.65. The evaluation of safety endpoints with the more sensitive ACUITY-defined bleeding found major bleeding in the femoral cohort to be 5.2% with cangrelor vs. 3.1% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 1.69 [1.35-2.12]); among the radial cohort the rate of ACUITY major bleeding was 1.5% with cangrelor vs. 0.7% with clopidogrel (OR [95% CI] = 2.17 [1.02-4.62], P-interaction 0.54).. In CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor reduced ischaemic events with no significant increase in GUSTO-defined severe bleeding. The absolute rates of bleeding, regardless of the definition, tended to be lower when PCI was performed via the radial artery.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Femoral Artery; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Radial Artery; Stents; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Cangrelor is an intravenous ADP receptor antagonist that leads to potent and reversible inhibition of platelet aggregation. The relative safety and efficacy of some antiplatelet drugs in women has been disputed.. The Cangrelor versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION PHOENIX) trial randomized 11,145 patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention to cangrelor or clopidogrel. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 hours; the key secondary end point was stent thrombosis at 48 hours. The primary safety end point was GUSTO severe bleeding at 48 hours. Of subjects analyzed, 3051 (28%) were female. Cangrelor reduced the odds of the primary end point by 35% in women (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.89) and by 14% in men (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.05; P interaction=0.23) compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor reduced the odds of stent thrombosis by 61% in women (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77) and 16% in men (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.33; P interaction=0.11). The odds of severe bleeding were similar in both women and men treated with cangrelor (0.3% versus 0.2%, P=0.30 [women]; 0.1% versus 0.1%, P=0.41 [men]; P interaction=0.88) versus clopidogrel. Cangrelor increased the odds of moderate bleeding in women (0.9% versus 0.3%, P=0.02), but not in men (0.2% versus 0.2%, P=0.68; P interaction=0.040). The net clinical benefit (primary efficacy and safety end point) favored cangrelor in both women (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92) and men (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06; P interaction=0.26).. In CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor reduced the odds of major adverse cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis in women and men and appeared to offer greater net clinical benefit than clopidogrel.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease Management; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sex Characteristics; Treatment Outcome

The Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX trial demonstrated superiority of cangrelor in reducing ischemic events at 48 hours in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with clopidogrel.. We analyzed all patients included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis in US (n=4097; 37.4%) and non-US subgroups (n=6845; 62.6%). The US cohort was older, had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, and had more frequently undergone prior cardiovascular procedures. US patients more frequently underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina (77.9% versus 46.2%). Almost all US patients (99.1%) received clopidogrel loading doses of 600 mg, whereas 40.5% of non-US patients received 300 mg. Bivalirudin was more frequently used in US patients (56.7% versus 2.9%). At 48 hours, rates of the primary composite end point were comparable in the US and non-US cohorts (5.5% versus 5.2%; P=0.53). Cangrelor reduced rates of the primary composite end point compared with clopidogrel in US (4.5% versus 6.4%; odds ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.53-0.92]) and in non-US patients (4.8% versus 5.6%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.69-1.05]; interaction P=0.26). Similarly, rates of the key secondary end point, stent thrombosis, were reduced by cangrelor in both regions. Rates of Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO)-defined severe bleeding were low and not significantly increased by cangrelor in either region.. Despite broad differences in clinical profiles and indications for percutaneous coronary intervention by region in a large global cardiovascular clinical trial, cangrelor consistently reduced rates of ischemic end points compared with clopidogrel without an excess in severe bleeding in both the US and non-US subgroups.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Brazil; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thailand; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of cangrelor in patients with stable angina (SA) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. The CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial demonstrated that cangrelor significantly reduced periprocedural ischemic events in all-comer percutaneous coronary intervention with a modest increase in mild and moderate bleeding. Whether this benefit is consistent across SA and ACS has not been explored fully.. The CHAMPION PHOENIX trial compared periprocedural administration of cangrelor or clopidogrel, with either a 300- or 600-mg loading dose for the prevention of periprocedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the 10,942 patients in the modified intention to treat population, 6,358 patients were classified as having SA, and 4,584 patients had ACS (including unstable angina, non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) at randomization. The primary composite endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 h. A key secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis, and the primary safety endpoint was GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) severe bleeding.. Cangrelor consistently reduced the primary endpoint in SA and ACS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67 to 1.01] and OR: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.96], respectively; interaction p = 0.41). Cangrelor also consistently reduced stent thrombosis in SA and ACS (OR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.30 to 1.01] and OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.42 to 1.06], respectively; interaction p = 0.62). The impact of cangrelor on GUSTO severe/moderate bleeding was also similar for SA and ACS (OR: 1.49 [95% CI: 0.67 to 3.33] and OR: 1.79 [95% CI: 0.79 to 4.07], respectively; interaction p = 0.75).. The benefits and risks of cangrelor were consistent in patients with SA and ACS. (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [CHAMPION PHOENIX] [CHAMPION]; NCT01156571).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Angina, Stable; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and bleeding outcomes of cangrelor in patients in the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin.. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor with rapid onset and offset. In the CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced 48-h ischemic events including stent thrombosis, without increasing major bleeding. Bivalirudin has demonstrated ischemic outcomes similar to those with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, with reduced bleeding but increased early stent thrombosis.. In the modified intent-to-treat population, 2,059 patients (18.8%) received bivalirudin, with 1,014 patients in the cangrelor treatment arm and 1,045 in the clopidogrel treatment arm.. At 48 h, the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis was lower with cangrelor versus clopidogrel (48 [4.7%] vs. 70 [6.7%]; odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, p = 0.047). Death was similar in both arms (2 [0.2%] vs. 2 [0.2%]). Myocardial infarction was reduced by cangrelor (37 [3.6%] vs. 59 [5.6%]; OR: 0.63, p = 0.03), as was death/myocardial infarction (39 [3.8%] vs. 61 [5.8%]; OR: 0.65, p = 0.04). Cangrelor was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward less stent thrombosis (7 [0.7%] vs. 15 [1.4%]; OR: 0.48, p = 0.10), which was evident within 2 h after percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.057). GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries) severe bleeding was similar in both arms (2 of 1,021 [0.2%] vs. 2 of 1,055 [0.2%]) as were other bleeding definitions and transfusions. Efficacy and safety results were consistent in patients with stable angina, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (p for interaction: 0.62 and 0.29).. Cangrelor may offer an attractive benefit risk profile when used in combination with bivalirudin.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Anticoagulants; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Hirudins; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Factors; Stents; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Overdosing of parenteral antithrombotic therapies can increase the risk of bleeding. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist with rapid onset and offset of action. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), compared with control, cangrelor (30 µg/kg bolus, followed immediately by a 4 µg/kg per minute infusion for 2-4 h or until the conclusion of the index PCI, whichever was longer) reduces periprocedural thrombotic complications without an increase in major bleeding complications, although minor bleeding is increased. The impact of cangrelor overdosing on bleeding is unknown and represented the aim of this analysis. Patients with cangrelor overdosing were identified among safety population patients enrolled in the CHAMPION program (n = 25,107). Overdose was defined as administration of an excess >20 % of the bolus dose (30 μg/kg) and/or infusion rate (4 μg/kg per min). Bleeding complications were assessed. Among the safety analysis population in the CHAMPION program, 12,565 patients received cangrelor. A total of 36 overdosed cangrelor patients (0.29 %) were identified in this pooled analysis (20 with both bolus and infusion, 5 with bolus only, and 11 with infusion only). In the majority of patients, the dose did not exceed 2.5 times the recommended dose. Bleeding events were balanced between treatment arms and were consistent with those in the overall CHAMPION program. Only one overdosed patient experienced a serious bleed. There was no correlation between bleeding and magnitude of cangrelor overdose. In a large clinical trial program of patients undergoing PCI, cangrelor overdosing was rare and not associated with an increase in bleeding complications, an observation that may be attributed to its very short-half life and rapid offset of action.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Drug Overdose; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The intensity of antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important determinant of PCI-related ischemic complications. Cangrelor is a potent intravenous adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor antagonist that acts rapidly and has quickly reversible effects.. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 11,145 patients who were undergoing either urgent or elective PCI and were receiving guideline-recommended therapy to receive a bolus and infusion of cangrelor or to receive a loading dose of 600 mg or 300 mg of clopidogrel. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 hours after randomization; the key secondary end point was stent thrombosis at 48 hours. The primary safety end point was severe bleeding at 48 hours.. The rate of the primary efficacy end point was 4.7% in the cangrelor group and 5.9% in the clopidogrel group (adjusted odds ratio with cangrelor, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.005). The rate of the primary safety end point was 0.16% in the cangrelor group and 0.11% in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.53 to 4.22; P=0.44). Stent thrombosis developed in 0.8% of the patients in the cangrelor group and in 1.4% in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.90; P=0.01). The rates of adverse events related to the study treatment were low in both groups, though transient dyspnea occurred significantly more frequently with cangrelor than with clopidogrel (1.2% vs. 0.3%). The benefit from cangrelor with respect to the primary end point was consistent across multiple prespecified subgroups.. Cangrelor significantly reduced the rate of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, during PCI, with no significant increase in severe bleeding. (Funded by the Medicines Company; CHAMPION PHOENIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01156571.).

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stents; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

Cangrelor, a nonthienopyridine adenosine triphosphate analogue, is an intravenous blocker of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y(12). This agent might have a role in the treatment of patients who require rapid, predictable, and profound but reversible platelet inhibition.. We performed a large-scale international trial comparing cangrelor with 600 mg of oral clopidogrel administered before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 48 hours.. We enrolled 8877 patients, and 8716 underwent PCI. At 48 hours, cangrelor was not superior to clopidogrel with respect to the primary composite end point, which occurred in 7.5% of patients in the cangrelor group and 7.1% of patients in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.24; P=0.59). Likewise, cangrelor was not superior at 30 days. The rate of major bleeding (according to Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy criteria) was higher with cangrelor, a difference that approached statistical significance (3.6% vs. 2.9%; odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.60; P=0.06), but this was not the case with major bleeding (according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria) or severe or life-threatening bleeding (according to Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries criteria). A secondary exploratory end point of death from any cause, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization showed a trend toward a reduction with cangrelor, but it was not significant (0.6% vs. 0.9%; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.14; P=0.14).. Cangrelor, when administered intravenously 30 minutes before PCI and continued for 2 hours after PCI, was not superior to an oral loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel, administered 30 minutes before PCI, in reducing the composite end point of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 48 hours. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00305162.)

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retreatment; Ticlopidine; Treatment Failure

Intravenous cangrelor, a rapid-acting, reversible adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, might reduce ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 5362 patients who had not been treated with clopidogrel to receive either cangrelor or placebo at the time of PCI, followed by 600 mg of clopidogrel. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 48 hours. Enrollment was stopped when an interim analysis concluded that the trial would be unlikely to show superiority for the primary end point.. The primary end point occurred in 185 of 2654 patients receiving cangrelor (7.0%) and in 210 of 2641 patients receiving placebo (8.0%) (odds ratio in the cangrelor group, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.07; P=0.17) (modified intention-to-treat population adjusted for missing data). In the cangrelor group, as compared with the placebo group, two prespecified secondary end points were significantly reduced at 48 hours: the rate of stent thrombosis, from 0.6% to 0.2% (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.85; P=0.02), and the rate of death from any cause, from 0.7% to 0.2% (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.83; P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of blood transfusion (1.0% in the cangrelor group and 0.6% in the placebo group, P=0.13), though major bleeding on one scale was increased in the cangrelor group, from 3.5% to 5.5% (P<0.001), because of more groin hematomas.. The use of periprocedural cangrelor during PCI was not superior to placebo in reducing the primary end point. The prespecified secondary end points of stent thrombosis and death were lower in the cangrelor group, with no significant increase in the rate of transfusion. Further study of intravenous ADP blockade with cangrelor may be warranted. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00385138.)

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retreatment; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Myocardial reperfusion is the main target of treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The intracoronary administration of cangrelor bolus could favor a higher local drug concentration, favoring an earlier thrombotic resolution and a reduced distal micro-embolization.. Seventy-one patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI: 37 treated with intracoronary and 34 with intravenous bolus administration of cangrelor. The primary endpoint was ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) ≥ 50% after 30 min from the end of the PCI. Other explorative reperfusion indices investigated were: STR ≥ 50% at 24 hours, STR ≥ 70% at 30 min, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and the QT dispersion. Moreover, acute and subacute stent thrombosis, bleeding events and 30-day mortality have been evaluated.. More frequent STR ≥ 50% was observed in the intravenous cangrelor bolus group as compared to the intracoronary administration at 30 min (71.9% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.033), the difference was maintained 24 hours after PCI (87.1% vs. 63.6%; p = 0.030). STR ≥ 70% at 30 min was statistically more frequent in the intravenous bolus administration cohort (66.7% vs. 28.6% p = 0.02). At multivariable analysis, intravenous cangrelor administration was significantly related to STR ≥ 50% (odds ratio: 3.586; 95% confidence interval: 1.134-11.335; p = 0.030). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5 bleedings was 15.5% and mortality was 4.2% without any significant difference between the two groups.. In conclusion the results of the study do not show any advantages in the administration of intracoronary bolus of cangrelor in patients affected by STEMI and treated with primary PCI.

Topics: Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Reperfusion; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

VA-ECMO is commonly used for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory cardiac arrest (CA) undergoing PCI for ACS. In this setting at high risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, optimal anti-thrombotic therapy remains ill-defined. We hypothesized that an anti-thrombotic therapy comprising a parenteral anticoagulant (bivalirudin) and a parenteral anti-platelet agent (cangrelor) may prove safe and effective in this scenario. From November 2019 to December 2021, 14 patients received at least one dose of cangrelor (starting dose: 0.125 μg/kg/min) plus bivalirudin, without background aspirin, in the context of PCI and VA-ECMO for ACS-related CS/CA, and were included in this study. Efficacy endpoint was occurrence of thrombotic events and safety endpoint was major bleeding occurrence. Median age was 58 years. The majority (64%) presented with refractory CA. A thrombotic event occurred in 14%, while major bleeding occurred in 21% patients. One patient experienced arterial thrombosis after VA-ECMO arterial cannula removal, another experienced ischemic cerebellar stroke without functional sequelae. Bleeding events were: 29% BARC 3a, 14% BARC 3b, and 7% BARC 5b. Overall in-hospital mortality was 50%. Cangrelor was continued for 5 (4-10) days; temporary discontinuation was necessary in 36%, either for VA-ECMO cannula removal or for bleeding events. A low dose of cangrelor, associated with standard-intensity anticoagulation with bivalirudin was a feasible anti-thrombotic strategy in patients undergoing PCI during VA-ECMO support for ACS-related CS/CA. Bleeding events rates outweighed thrombotic events rates in this critically-ill population, although the observed rates were lowest among available studies.

Topics: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Shock, Cardiogenic; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Patients with refractory cardiogenic shock from an acute myocardial infarction may receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and require the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The purpose of this study was to compare bleeding and thrombotic events in patients treated with cangrelor plus aspirin versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) while supported with VA-ECMO.. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received PCI, were supported with VA-ECMO, and were treated with either cangrelor plus aspirin or oral DAPT from February 2016 through May 2021 at Allegheny General Hospital. The primary objective was the incidence of major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or greater. The incidence of thrombotic events was a secondary objective.. Thirty-seven patients were included, 19 in the cangrelor plus aspirin group, and 18 in the oral DAPT group. All the patients in the cangrelor group received a dose of 0.75 mcg/kg/min. Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (36.8%) in the cangrelor group compared to 7 patients (38.9%) in the oral DAPT group (p = 0.90). No patient developed stent thrombosis. Two patients (10.5%) in the cangrelor group had a thrombotic event versus 3 patients (16.7%) in the oral DAPT group (p = 0.66).. Bleeding and thrombotic events were comparable between patients receiving cangrelor plus aspirin versus oral DAPT while on VA-ECMO.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To describe cangrelor use in patients on concurrent mechanical circulatory support who underwent postpercutaneous coronary intervention.. A single-center, retrospective, cohort study.. At a quaternary teaching hospital.. Included patients were ≥18 years old, admitted to the intensive care unit, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement, initiated on mechanical circulatory support, and received cangrelor in the postpercutaneous coronary intervention period.. Retrospectively analyzed cangrelor use in patients on mechanical circulatory support.. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombosis and bleeding events during cangrelor administration. Additional outcomes included initial cangrelor dose, number of cangrelor dose adjustments per patient, survival from mechanical circulatory support, and mortality within 30 days. Overall, 19 patients were included in this study. In total, 14 patients (74%) experienced a bleeding event; however, 93% were classified as a minor bleed. There was 1 major bleeding event. There were no thrombotic events observed during cangrelor administration. The median initial cangrelor dose was 0.5 µg/kg/min. There were 10 patients who underwent dose adjustment, with the majority being dose reductions based on antiplatelet monitoring (VerifyNow assay). Survival from mechanical circulatory support occurred in 17 patients (89%), and 30-day mortality occurred in 8 patients (42%).. For patients receiving cangrelor as a bridge to oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy on mechanical circulatory support, the authors observed a low rate of major bleeding and no episodes of thrombosis. Lower starting doses appear feasible with no observed increased risk of thrombotic complications. Future studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Adolescent; Cohort Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Patients with percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing procedures often require interruptions in their dual antiplatelet therapy. Periprocedural bridging is considered for patients at high thrombotic risk using intravenous cangrelor, a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor with a short half-life, or eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, with a slightly longer half-life but less costly alternative. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cangrelor compared with eptifibatide when used in a periprocedural setting. The primary outcome of this retrospective cohort study was the incidence of bleeding events defined by the global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria, and the secondary outcomes include the transfusion requirements, inpatient major cardiac adverse events, and cost savings per patient. A total of 75 patients were included who were bridged to procedures (cangrelor, n = 50; eptifibatide, n = 25). There were no significant differences in overall bleeding events defined by global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria: mild bleeding [8% (n= 4) vs. 8% (n= 2); P = 0.68], moderate bleeding [28% (n = 14) vs. 48% (n = 12); P = 0.07), and severe bleeding [8% (n = 4) vs. 8% (n = 2); P = 0.25] between cangrelor and eptifibatide. The composite inpatient major cardiac adverse events were also similar between cangrelor and eptifibatide [10% (n = 10) vs. 8% (n = 8); P = 0.78]. The average cost savings per each cangrelor patient on the equivalent duration of eptifibatide was calculated out to be $5824 per patient. Cangrelor and eptifibatide were similar in terms of safety and efficacy when used as a bridge in patients with recent coronary stents, but considerable cost savings could be made if cangrelor was substituted for by eptifibatide in select patients. Further studies are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Eptifibatide; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The itAlian pRospective Study on CANGrELOr (ARCANGELO) was aimed to assess the safety of using cangrelor during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the daily practice.. The safety of cangrelor after the transition to oral P2Y12 inhibitors was evaluated as the incidence of bleeding outcomes in the 30 days following PCI according to postauthorization safety study guidelines.. Adults with ACS who were treated with cangrelor in one of the 28 centers involved in the study. Patients who consented to participate were followed in the 30 days following their PCI. Bleedings (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] classification), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and adverse events were recorded. The interim results at two-thirds of the enrollment period are presented.. A total of 17 bleedings were observed in the 320 patients who completed the study at this stage. All bleedings were classified as BARC Type 1-2, except for one case of Type 3a (vessel puncture site hematoma). Four patients experienced MACEs (2 acute myocardial infarctions, 1 sudden cardiac death, 1 noncardiovascular death due to respiratory distress, and multiorgan failure). None of the bleedings was rated as related to cangrelor.. The interim results of the ARCANGELO study provide a preliminary confirmation that the use of cangrelor on patients with ACS undergoing PCI is not associated with severe bleedings.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Adult; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Treatment Outcome

To date, there are no real-world studies comparing cangrelor to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thus, we performed this study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cangrelor compared to GPI during PCI.. We identified patients who underwent PCI at our institution who received either cangrelor or GPI during PCI. Patients already on GPI or cangrelor prior to PCI or who received both cangrelor and GPI were excluded. Baseline demographics and clinical outcomes were extracted. Major bleeding is defined as a composite of major hematoma >4 cm, hematocrit drop >15, and gastrointestinal bleeding.. A total of 2072 patients received adjunctive antiplatelet therapy during PCI (cangrelor [n=478]; GPI [n=1594]). Patients' mean age was 61±12 years. Most (66%) presented with acute coronary syndrome. Patients who received cangrelor were older and had a higher percentage of acute coronary syndrome and lower baseline hematocrit in comparison with patients who received GPI. Procedural success was achieved in 94% of patients, with no difference between groups. Major bleeding events (1.7% vs. 5.1%, P=.001), any vascular complication rates, and hospital length of stay were significantly lower in the cangrelor group. In-hospital ischemic events did not differ between groups. On regression analysis, patients on cangrelor were noted to have significantly lower major bleeding events (OR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.59).. Balancing ischemic and bleeding risks with adjunctive antiplatelet drugs is of prime importance during PCI. Our real-world analysis shows that cangrelor is safe and effective when compared to GPI during PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hematocrit; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Although premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic complications, patients may present with an urgent need for surgery that would require interruption of DAPT. Antiplatelet bridge therapy using cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Aspirin; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Perioperative Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Ticagrelor

The effect of perioperative bridging therapy on risks of ischemic cardiac events and major bleeding complications in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains undefined.. We report on 60 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2017 who required cardiac (CS; n = 15) or non-cardiac (NCS; n = 45) surgeries following PCI at our institution. Short-acting intravenous (IV) antiplatelet (APT) bridging with eptifibatide, tirofiban and cangrelor were instituted after DAPT interruption.. All patients were men with multiple atherosclerosis risk factors. An acute coronary syndrome indication (56.7%) was the most common PCI indication in the CS and NCS groups. Drug-eluting stents were used in 93.33% and 95.56% of the above groups, respectively. The median duration from PCI to CS and NCS were 11.17 and 18.25 months, respectively and 38.33% of all surgeries were performed within 6 months of the index PCI. Most patients were on background aspirin (83.33%) and clopidogrel (81.67%) and median duration of DAPT interruption was 7 days. Median duration of perioperative IV APT bridging was 3 days for CS and 5 days for NCS groups. In the CS group, two patients (13.33%) had non-fata myocardial infarction (MI), and four (26.67%) had clinically significant bleeding. No patients had perioperative stent thrombosis. In the NCS group, one patient (2.22%) had stent thrombosis; four (6.67%) had myocardial infarction, and five (11.11%) clinically significant bleeding.. Despite using IV APT as bridging therapy during perioperative DAPT interruption in post-PCI patients, postoperative cardiac events and bleeding complications can still occur.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aspirin; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Eptifibatide; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Perioperative Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Tirofiban; Treatment Outcome

This nationwide study aimed to analyse the first 2 years of routine clinical use of cangrelor in all Swedish patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This observational Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) study identified 915 cangrelor-treated patients. As 899 were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-patients undergoing primary PCI, we decided to exclude all non-STEMI patients (n = 16) from the following analysis. We then identified all primary PCI patients, January 2016 to January 2018 (n = 10 816). Excluding hospitals without cangrelor use, tailoring time frames from first cangrelor use per hospital, patients treated with cangrelor (n = 899) were compared with those without cangrelor treatment (n = 4614). A separate analysis was performed for cardiac arrest STEMI patients (n = 273). Cangrelor-use in primary PCI varied greatly between hospitals (4-36%, mean 16%). At variance with randomized trials, cangrelor was used nearly exclusively in STEMI, often with cardiac arrest (19%). Cangrelor was combined with ticagrelor in two-thirds of patients, among which >50% was prehospital. Cangrelor was used more frequently in high-risk patients: left main PCI, thrombus aspiration, and cardiac arrest. Despite cangrelor being used in more high-risk patients, crude definite stent thrombosis rates at 30 days were low and similar in cangrelor (0.7%) and non-cangrelor treated patients (0.8%).. Cangrelor was used nearly exclusively in primary PCI STEMI patients, predominantly with ticagrelor. Despite being used in very high-risk patients, often with cardiac arrest, cangrelor treatment was associated with low stent thrombosis rates.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Utilization; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Sweden; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), who did not receive P2Y. The CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) double-blind randomized trial compared cangrelor with clopidogrel loading dose at the time of PCI. Pretreatment with clopidogrel before randomization was not permitted per protocol. In the clopidogrel-only group (n=5438), a loading dose was given before (early load [EL]) or after the start of PCI (late load [LL]) according to physician choice. Overall, 3442 (63.3%) patients had EL and 1997 LL (36.7%). Median times were 5 minutes before and 20 minutes after the start of PCI, respectively. EL was more frequently used among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (84.4%) and non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes (71.5%) than in stable patients (53.7%). At 48 hours, rates of the primary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis were similar (6.0% versus 5.4%) for EL versus LL, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.87-1.41]; P=0.41), and remained so after adjustment for potential confounders, including clinical presentation (OR [95% CI], 1.39 [0.90-2.15]; P=0.14). Compared with clopidogrel, cangrelor consistently reduced the primary outcome in both EL (4.8% versus 6.0%; OR [95% CI], 0.80 [0.64-0.98]) and LL (4.3% versus 5.4%; OR [95% CI], 0.79 [0.59-1.06]; interaction P=0.99). Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries severe/moderate bleeding rates were similar between treatment arms for both EL (OR [95% CI], 1.24 [0.58-2.66]) and LL (OR [95% CI], 2.53 [0.98-6.54]; interaction P=0.25).. In a nonrandomized comparison of patients with clopidogrel loading before or after the start of PCI, the rates of periprocedural PCI complications, including bleeding, were similar, as were the benefits of cangrelor, regardless of the timing.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The influence of cangrelor on the incidence and outcomes of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) thrombocytopenia is not defined. We aimed to explore the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of thrombocytopenia after PCI in cangrelor-treated patients.. This was a pooled, patient-level analysis of the CHAMPION trials (Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition), which compared cangrelor with clopidogrel for prevention of thrombotic complications during and after PCI. Acquired thrombocytopenia was defined as either a drop in platelet count to <100 000 after PCI or a drop of >50% between baseline and a follow-up. The main efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac events. The primary safety outcome was noncoronary artery bypass grafting-related Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries-defined severe bleeding at 48 hours. Patients (23 783) were enrolled, and 3009 (12.7%) received a GPI (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor). Acquired thrombocytopenia occurred in 200 patients (0.8%). The adjusted rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 48 hours was significantly higher in patients who developed thrombocytopenia compared with those who did not (odds ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.89-4.69;. Acquired thrombocytopenia after PCI is strongly associated with substantial early morbidity and mortality, as well as major bleeding. GPI use is a significant predictor of thrombocytopenia. Cangrelor is not associated with acquired thrombocytopenia, and its clinical efficacy and safety is consistent irrespective of thrombocytopenia occurrence.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00305162, NCT00385138, and NCT01156571.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Count; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Bleeding frequently occurs in patients undergoing placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Clinical factors that have been identified as contributing to peri-procedural bleeding include LVAD implantation after an acute myocardial infarction and preoperative use of antiplatelet agents. In this report, we describe the use of cangrelor for preoperative antiplatelet bridging to LVAD in five post myocardial infarction patients with cardiogenic shock that had recently undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. During the cangrelor bridging period, no cases of thrombotic or major bleeding events occurred. During the first week following LVAD implantation, two patients experienced a major bleeding (each case required chest exploration for suspected hemorrhage). To our knowledge, this is the first series describing cangrelor use for antiplatelet bridging in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. While this series suggest cangrelor could possibly be a safe and effective antiplatelet bridging strategy, further research is needed to identify the optimal antithrombotic strategy in cardiogenic shock patients undergoing LVAD implantation who have recently undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures; Female; Heart Ventricles; Heart-Assist Devices; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Shock, Cardiogenic

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pulmonary Edema

Cangrelor is a potent intravenous adenosine diphosphate-receptor antagonist that in the CHAMPION trials reduced the 48-hour and 30-day rates of ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention without an increase in severe bleeding.. CHAMPION PCI (A Clinical Trial to Demonstrate the Efficacy of Cangrelor), CHAMPION PLATFORM (Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition), and CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trials in which cangrelor was compared with clopidogrel during percutaneous coronary intervention. The effect of cangrelor on ischemic events and bleeding was analyzed in the subgroup of patients with a history of cerebrovascular events at least 1 year prior to randomization; the Breslow-Day test was used to test for interaction of treatment effect in subgroups with and without such a history. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 48 hours. Among 24 910 randomized patients, 1270 patients (5.1%) had a cerebrovascular event >1 year old, including 650 assigned to cangrelor and 620 assigned to clopidogrel. Consistent with the overall trial results, the rate of the primary efficacy end point was 4.3% in the cangrelor group versus 5.3% in the clopidogrel group (odds ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.34; P=0.40; P for interaction =0.97), and the rate of GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) severe bleeding was 0.3% in both groups (P=0.97; P for interaction =0.81).. Among patients in the CHAMPION trials with a prior cerebrovascular event at least 1 year before the percutaneous coronary intervention, the efficacy and bleeding profile of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel was similar to that in the overall trial.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In three comparative trials in a total of about 25,000 patients requiring coronary angioplasty, IV cangrelor was not more effective in reducing mortality than oral clopidogrel, and it only improved cardiovascular morbidity in a biased trial. Cangrelor can provoke bleeding, kidney failure and dyspnea.

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design

Ibrutinib is an irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and mantle cell lymphoma that increases the risk of bleeding among patients. Platelets from ibrutinib-treated patients exhibit deficiencies in collagen-evoked signaling in suspension; however, the significance of this observation and how it relates to bleeding risk is unclear, as platelets encounter immobile collagen in vivo. We sought to clarify the effects of ibrutinib on platelet function to better understand the mechanism underlying bleeding risk.. By comparing signaling in suspension and during adhesion to immobilized ligands, we found that the collagen signaling deficiency caused by ibrutinib is milder during adhesion to immobilized collagen. We also found that platelets in whole blood treated with ibrutinib adhered to collagen under arterial shear but formed unstable thrombi, suggesting that the collagen signaling deficiency caused by ibrutinib may not be the predominant cause of bleeding in vivo. However, clot retraction and signaling evoked by platelet adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen were also inhibited by ibrutinib, indicating that integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling is also effected in addition to GPVI signaling. When ibrutinib was combined with the P2Y12 inhibitor, cangrelor, thrombus formation under arterial shear was inhibited additively.. These findings suggest that (1) ibrutinib causes GPVI and integrin αIIbβ3 platelet signaling deficiencies that result in formation of unstable thrombi and may contribute toward bleeding observed in vivo and (2) combining ibrutinib with P2Y12 antagonists, which also inhibit thrombus stability, may have a detrimental effect on hemostasis.

Topics: Adenine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Blood Platelets; Calcium Signaling; Collagen; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fibrinogen; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Piperidines; Platelet Adhesiveness; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Drug Approval; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retreatment; Stents; Treatment Outcome