cangrelor and Cardiovascular-Diseases

The pharmacological and clinical differences of the three recommended oral P2Y

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Clopidogrel; Drug Substitution; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with several abnormalities in haemostasis predisposing to thrombosis. Moreover, T2D was recently connected with a failure in antiplatelet response to clopidogrel, the most commonly used ADP receptor blocker in clinical practice. Clopidogrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was repeatedly associated with the risk of ischemic adverse events. Patients with T2D show significantly higher residual platelet reactivity on ADP receptor blocker therapy and are more frequently represented in the group of patients with HTPR. This paper reviews the current knowledge about possible interactions between T2D and ADP receptor blocker therapy.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Resistance; Humans; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Factors; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Dual therapy with a P2Y

Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of coronary artery disease and its sequalae is of great significance. Acetil Salycilic Acid (ASA) has continued to dominate the field as a potent antiplatelet agent, due to its ease of use and cost effectiveness. In addition to this, clopidogrel has also been widely used with better long term administration results in patients with atherosclerotic disease. However, interpatient variability and resistance to clopidogrel has opened the doors for further investigative research to find another agent which potentially meets the pharmacokinetic demands whilst having a satisfactory safety profile. Prasugrel and other novel nonthienopyridine derivatives are currently under investigation, with previous trials showing very reassuring outcomes. Patented inventions along with large trials have shown that prasugrel significantly reduces ischemic end points, ultimately resulting in a decrease in Myocardial infarctions, thromboocculusive episodes and death. Further studies are required to support these findings before we are aware of all clinical effects of Prasugrel.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Patents as Topic; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyridines; Receptor, PAR-1; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Receptors, Thrombin; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Aspirin is the foundation antiplatelet therapy for patients at risk of cardiovascular events. The thienopyridine, clopidogrel, is modestly more effective than aspirin and in patients with stroke seems to be as effective as the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin further reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and those who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, but uncertainty remains about whether this combination has incremental efficacy over clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with stroke or peripheral arterial disease. Clopidogrel has pharmacological limitations that have prompted the search for more effective ADP-receptor antagonists. Promising results have been achieved with the thienopyridine, prasugrel, which has been compared with clopidogrel in patients treated with aspirin. The nonthienopyridine P2Y(12) inhibitors AZD6140 and cangrelor are presently being evaluated in phase III, randomized, controlled trials.

Topics: Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Stents; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

There is great interest in assessing the efficacy of treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with cardiovascular disease using procedures that can be used in a remote setting. Here we have established methods to assess the effects of clopidogrel and aspirin on platelets based on measurements of platelet P-selectin. Platelets were stimulated in whole blood by adding the combination of adenosine diphosphate and the TXA(2) mimetic U46619 (ADP/U4, designed to assess P2Y(12) inhibition) or the combination of arachidonic acid and epinephrine (AA/Epi, designed to assess COX-1 inhibition). The stimulated samples were then fixed using a fixative solution that provides stability for at least 9 days, and sent to a central laboratory for analysis of P-selectin by flow cytometry. Measurements were performed in blood from healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease. The inhibitory effects of clopidogrel and aspirin were assessed ex vivo and the effects of the direct acting P2Y(12) antagonist cangrelor and aspirin were assessed in vitro. Measurements of platelet aggregation were also performed for comparison. In healthy volunteers clopidogrel ex vivo and cangrelor in vitro markedly inhibited P-selectin expression induced by ADP/U4. Aspirin did not inhibit and did not interfere with the effects of clopidogrel or cangrelor using this test. There was very little overlap of results obtained in the absence and presence of clopidogrel or cangrelor. In contrast, over half of 42 patients with cardiovascular disease did not respond well to clopidogrel treatment, although cangrelor was still effective. Aspirin markedly inhibited P-selectin expression induced by AA/Epi. Clopidogrel had much less effect and did not interfere with the effects of aspirin. There was no overlap of results obtained in the absence and presence of aspirin. Aspirin provided near-complete inhibition in 29 of 30 patients with cardiovascular disease. Aggregometry measurements agreed well with the P-selectin data obtained ex vivo following both clopidogrel and aspirin treatment. It is concluded that measurements of P-selectin performed on fixed blood samples following platelet stimulation in whole blood in a remote setting can be used effectively to monitor the effects of clopidogrel and aspirin.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Monophosphate; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Drug Monitoring; Female; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Male; P-Selectin; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Ticlopidine; Tissue Fixation