candesartan has been researched along with Cardiac Failure in 197 studies
candesartan: a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist
candesartan : A benzimidazolecarboxylic acid that is 1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid substituted by an ethoxy group at position 2 and a ({2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl}methyl) group at position 1. It is a angiotensin receptor antagonist used for the treatment of hypertension.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"We use the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) randomized trial." | 9.34 | Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial. ( Claggett, BL; Granger, B; Hernán, MA; Murray, EJ; Solomon, SD, 2020) |
"We tested the hypothesis that candesartan improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction [HFmrEF; ejection fraction (EF) 40-49%]." | 9.27 | Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. ( Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Lam, CS; Liu, J; Lund, LH; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Rosano, GM; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2018) |
"To evaluate the impact of AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) on the response to candesartan in patients with heart failure." | 9.27 | A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure. ( de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Fouodjio, R; Giannetti, N; Guertin, MC; Huynh, T; Langlois, M; Lavoie, J; LeBlanc, MH; Lepage, S; Mansour, A; Mongrain, I; Normand, V; O'Meara, E; Phillips, MS; Provost, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Sheppard, R; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2018) |
"The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks." | 9.27 | Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction ( Abe, Y; Ajioka, M; Anzai, T; Aonuma, K; Asakura, M; Hamasaki, T; Hayashi, T; Hiramitsu, S; Kawai, H; Kimura, K; Kioka, H; Kitakaze, M; Lim, YJ; Matsuoka, K; Motoki, H; Nagata, Y; Nakamura, S; Ohte, N; Ozaki, Y; Sasaoka, T; Takahama, H; Tamaki, S, 2018) |
"Patients enrolled in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) Program were divided into groups by tertiles of baseline heart rate." | 9.16 | Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program. ( Castagno, D; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Takeuchi, M; Yusuf, S, 2012) |
"The long-term effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or their combination have been incompletely studied in a large cohort of patients with heart failure not treated with beta-blockers." | 9.14 | Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker. ( Afzal, R; Floras, J; McKelvie, RS; Rouleau, JL; White, M; Yusuf, S, 2009) |
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)." | 9.14 | Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009) |
"It is unknown whether there is an interaction between aspirin and angiotensin receptor blockers on outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF)." | 9.14 | Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Chang, SM; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; Kosolcharoen, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Murray, DR; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2010) |
"To explore the impact of selected candidate genes on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and antiinflammatory effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure who are already being treated with an ACE inhibitor." | 9.13 | Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan. ( Bélanger, F; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Touyz, RM; Turgeon, J; White, M; Whittom, L; Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M, 2008) |
"We investigated the change in weight over 6 months in 6933 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme, and its association with subsequent mortality (1435 deaths) over a median 32." | 9.13 | Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Anker, SD; Dobson, J; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, KB; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"We analysed outcomes in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme which randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF and a broad range of EF." | 9.13 | Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, CB; MacDonald, MR; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Varyani, F; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"Candesartan has a favorable effect on large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure." | 9.12 | Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program. ( Arnold, JM; Desai, SS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Marchiori, G; Mitchell, GF; O'Brien, TX; Pfeffer, MA; Warner, E, 2006) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme was designed as three parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in three different but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure." | 9.12 | Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Ostergren, JB, 2006) |
"We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs)." | 9.12 | Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Ducharme, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olsson, LG; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2006) |
"We assessed the effects of candesartan in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on N-terminal pro-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress as well as on glucose regulation in patients with heart failure (HF)." | 9.12 | Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure. ( Dabouz, F; De Denus, S; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Touyz, R; White, M; Whittom, L, 2007) |
"We compared outcomes in 2400 women and 5199 men randomized in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program using multivariable regression analyses." | 9.12 | Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Clayton, T; Granger, CB; McEntegart, MB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Piña, IL; Pocock, S; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"We examined the influence of BMI on prognosis using Cox proportional hazards models in 7599 patients (mean age, 65 years; 35% women) with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II to IV) and a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions (mean, 39%) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program." | 9.12 | Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, PV; Granger, CB; Kenchaiah, S; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, LA, 2007) |
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction." | 9.11 | Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004) |
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)." | 9.11 | Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, C; McMurray, J; Michelson, E; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, M; Solomon, S; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2004) |
"We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial." | 9.11 | Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; McMurray, JV; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, J; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and significantly reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions for heart failure." | 9.10 | Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and reduced cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors." | 9.10 | Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"Candesartan has a moderate impact in preventing admissions for CHF among patients who have heart failure and LVEF higher than 40%." | 9.10 | Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"Twenty-eight heart failure patients, who were on stable ACE inhibitor therapy, were randomised to receive adjunctive therapy with candesartan or placebo." | 9.10 | Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress. ( Anderson, RA; Blackman, DJ; Ellis, GR; Frenneaux, MP; Jackson, SK; Lang, D; Lewis, MJ; Morris-Thurgood, J; Mumford, C; Nightingale, AK; Penney, MD; Timmins, G, 2002) |
"We investigated the effects of candesartan (an angiotensin II antagonist) alone, enalapril alone, and their combination on exercise tolerance, ventricular function, quality of life (QOL), neurohormone levels, and tolerability in congestive heart failure (CHF)." | 9.09 | Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. ( Avezum, A; Burns, RJ; Latini, R; Maggioni, A; McKelvie, RS; Pericak, D; Pogue, J; Probstfield, J; Rouleau, J; Tsuyuki, RT; White, M; Young, J; Yusuf, S, 1999) |
"The UK National Health Service (NHS) currently spends in excess of £250 million per annum on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure; with candesartan currently dominating the market." | 8.87 | Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis. ( Bodalia, PN; Grosso, AM; Hingorani, AD; Macallister, RJ; Moon, JC; Scott, MA, 2011) |
"Recent studies have shown candesartan to be an effective therapy for heart failure (HF) patients, producing a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity." | 8.85 | The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure. ( McKelvie, RS, 2009) |
" Candesartan, a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist, has been shown to be an effective, and well-tolerated therapy, in both the early and late phases of cardiovascular disease (prehypertension, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure)." | 8.84 | Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach. ( Barrios, V; Calderon, A; Escobar, C, 2007) |
"The CHARM programme, which recruited 7,601 patients, compared the angiotensin-receptor blocker, candesartan, with a placebo in three different populations with class II-VI heart failure." | 8.82 | [Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme]. ( Matsuzaki, M; Umemoto, S, 2004) |
"Sacubitril/valsartan was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%." | 8.12 | Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective. ( Clark, J; Gandotra, C; Liu, Q; Rose, M; Senatore, FF; Stockbridge, NL; Zhang, J, 2022) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor." | 8.12 | Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme. ( Asselin, G; Barhdadi, A; Carss, K; Chazara, O; Cunningham, JW; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Granger, CB; Haefliger, C; Lemaçon, A; Lemieux Perreault, LP; McMurray, JJV; Mongrain, I; Paul, DS; Provost, S; Rouleau, J; Solomon, SD; Tardif, JC; Wang, Q; Yusuf, S, 2022) |
"To assess the hypothesis that losartan use is associated with increased all-cause mortality in heart failure patients as compared with candesartan." | 7.78 | Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure. ( Hviid, A; Pasternak, B; Svanström, H, 2012) |
"In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP." | 7.74 | Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program. ( Anand, I; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Meredith, PA; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"Rabbits subjected to ventricular tachypacing at 380 to 400 bpm for 4 weeks in the absence and presence of treatment with pioglitazone, candesartan, and combined pioglitazone and candesartan were assessed by electrophysiologic study, atrial fibrosis measurements, and cytokine expression analyses." | 7.74 | Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure. ( Harata, S; Inden, Y; Kitamura, K; Murohara, T; Nattel, S; Shimano, M; Tsuji, Y; Uchikawa, T, 2008) |
"The CHARM program was designed as 3 separate randomized trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who (1) were intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =0." | 7.73 | The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Hennekens, CH; Pocock, S; Wang, D; Wilhelmsen, L, 2005) |
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on patients' perception of symptoms, using the McMaster Overall treatment evaluation (OTE), in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)." | 7.73 | Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, C; Lewis, E; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, J; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"This study was designed to examine the hypothesis that a calcium channel blocker nifedipine (CCB) could enhance the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-ll receptor blocker candesartan (ARB) in the treatment for heart failure." | 7.73 | Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure. ( Hayashi, T; Horimoto, H; Inamoto, S; Kitaura, Y; Mieno, S; Mori, T; Okabe, M; Okuda, N, 2005) |
"To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure." | 7.73 | Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. ( Demers, C; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"The goal of this study was to determine whether an Angiotensin II receptor antagonist, candesartan, prevents myocardial fibrosis more effectively than enalapril in animals with a non-ACE pathway during the progression of congestive heart failure (CHF)." | 7.72 | Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure. ( Dohi, K; Funabiki, K; Imanaka-Yoshida, K; Ito, M; Kitamura, T; Koji, T; Nakano, T; Nobori, T; Onishi, K, 2004) |
"Candesartan has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events when therapy was started 6 months after PCI with bare-metal stents in patients who survived restenosis." | 6.82 | Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial. ( Hokimoto, S; Kikuta, K; Kimura, K; Koide, S; Matsui, K; Matsumura, T; Nakao, K; Ogawa, H; Oka, H; Oshima, S; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, H; Tsujita, K; Yamamoto, N, 2016) |
"HD candesartan was more effective in improving plasma BNP levels and cardiac function than LD in Japanese CHF patients." | 6.78 | Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. ( Matsuzaki, M; Miyata, Y; Nakamura, K; Nakata, E; Sugiura, K; Tsutsui, H; Yamamoto, K; Yano, M, 2013) |
" Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more frequent in the candesartan group: placebo/candesartan risk (%), lowest compared with highest age category: hyperkalemia (0." | 6.73 | Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme. ( Cohen-Solal, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome." | 6.43 | Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006) |
"Candesartan is a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist that is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with insurmountable receptor binding abilities." | 6.43 | Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006) |
"Candesartan cilexetil is a nonpeptide selective blocker of the angiotensin II receptor sub-type 1." | 6.43 | Candesartan in heart failure. ( Chonlahan, JS; Germany, RE; Ripley, TL, 2006) |
"Candesartan is a selective angiotensin II Type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker which binds tightly to, and dissociates slowly from the receptor." | 6.42 | Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. ( Ostergren, J, 2004) |
" Considering these factors, a more individualized approach of candesartan dosing should be investigated in patients with HF." | 5.62 | Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. ( Bonnefois, G; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Kassem, I; Li, J; Nekka, F; Rouleau, JL; Sanche, S; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2021) |
"Candesartan treatment significantly reversed the increases in both AQP2 and p-AQP2 expression and targeting." | 5.35 | Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade. ( Frøkiaer, J; Jonassen, T; Kim, SW; Knepper, MA; Kwon, TH; Lütken, SC; Marples, D; Nielsen, S, 2009) |
"We use the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) randomized trial." | 5.34 | Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial. ( Claggett, BL; Granger, B; Hernán, MA; Murray, EJ; Solomon, SD, 2020) |
"The authors pooled data from 3 trials-CHARM Preserved (Candesartan Cilexietil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity), I-Preserve (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function), and the Americas region of TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) (N = 8,916)-and examined whether MI before or following enrollment independently predicted CV death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization." | 5.34 | Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials. ( Anand, IS; Carson, P; Claggett, BL; Cunningham, JW; Desai, AS; Jhund, PS; John, JE; Kober, L; Lewis, EF; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Pitt, B; Shah, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vaduganathan, M; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2020) |
"We tested the hypothesis that candesartan improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction [HFmrEF; ejection fraction (EF) 40-49%]." | 5.27 | Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. ( Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Lam, CS; Liu, J; Lund, LH; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Rosano, GM; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2018) |
"To evaluate the impact of AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) on the response to candesartan in patients with heart failure." | 5.27 | A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure. ( de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Fouodjio, R; Giannetti, N; Guertin, MC; Huynh, T; Langlois, M; Lavoie, J; LeBlanc, MH; Lepage, S; Mansour, A; Mongrain, I; Normand, V; O'Meara, E; Phillips, MS; Provost, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Sheppard, R; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2018) |
"The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks." | 5.27 | Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction ( Abe, Y; Ajioka, M; Anzai, T; Aonuma, K; Asakura, M; Hamasaki, T; Hayashi, T; Hiramitsu, S; Kawai, H; Kimura, K; Kioka, H; Kitakaze, M; Lim, YJ; Matsuoka, K; Motoki, H; Nagata, Y; Nakamura, S; Ohte, N; Ozaki, Y; Sasaoka, T; Takahama, H; Tamaki, S, 2018) |
"We studied 7599 patients enrolled in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity program." | 5.20 | Prognostic importance of temporal changes in resting heart rate in heart failure patients: an analysis of the CHARM program. ( Castagno, D; Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, P; McMurray, JJ; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vazir, A; Yusuf, S, 2015) |
"We analyzed outcomes by international geographic region in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve), the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Preserved trial, the CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Added HF-REF trials, and the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in HF-REF (CORONA)." | 5.20 | International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. ( Carson, PE; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Kjekshus, J; Komajda, M; Kristensen, SL; Køber, L; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wedel, H; Wikstrand, J; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2015) |
"We used the treatment-arm of the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD-T) as the reference trial for comparison of an ACE inhibitor to placebo and the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity-Alternative trial (CHARM-Alternative) as the reference trial for comparison of an ARB to placebo." | 5.20 | A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure. ( Andersen, K; Arango, JL; Arnold, M; Bayram, E; Bĕlohlávek, J; Böhm, M; Boytsov, S; Burgess, L; Cabrera, W; Chen, CH; Desai, A; Erglis, A; Fu, M; Gomez, E; Gong, J; Gonzalez, A; Greenlaw, N; Hagege, AA; Katova, T; Kiatchoosakun, S; Kim, KS; Lefkowitz, M; Martinez, F; McMurray, J; Mendoza, I; Merkely, B; Mosterd, A; Negrusz-Kawecka, M; Packer, M; Peuhkurinen, K; Ramires, F; Refsgaard, J; Rizkala, A; Rouleau, J; Senni, M; Shi, V; Sibulo, AS; Silva-Cardoso, J; Solomon, S; Squire, I; Starling, RC; Swedberg, K; Teerlink, JR; Vinereanu, D; Wong, R; Zile, MR, 2015) |
"Patients enrolled in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) Program were divided into groups by tertiles of baseline heart rate." | 5.16 | Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program. ( Castagno, D; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Takeuchi, M; Yusuf, S, 2012) |
"The long-term effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or their combination have been incompletely studied in a large cohort of patients with heart failure not treated with beta-blockers." | 5.14 | Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker. ( Afzal, R; Floras, J; McKelvie, RS; Rouleau, JL; White, M; Yusuf, S, 2009) |
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)." | 5.14 | Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009) |
"The addition of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan to a angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure." | 5.14 | Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for heart failure patients: is combination treatment a feasible prospect? ( Dubrey, SW; Grocott-Mason, R; McDonagh, S; Mehta, PA; Phillips, J, 2009) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF to receive candesartan or placebo." | 5.14 | Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure receiving bronchodilators in the CHARM programme. ( Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; Maggioni, AP; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2010) |
"It is unknown whether there is an interaction between aspirin and angiotensin receptor blockers on outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF)." | 5.14 | Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Chang, SM; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; Kosolcharoen, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Murray, DR; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2010) |
"To explore the impact of selected candidate genes on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and antiinflammatory effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure who are already being treated with an ACE inhibitor." | 5.13 | Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan. ( Bélanger, F; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Touyz, RM; Turgeon, J; White, M; Whittom, L; Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M, 2008) |
"We investigated the change in weight over 6 months in 6933 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme, and its association with subsequent mortality (1435 deaths) over a median 32." | 5.13 | Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Anker, SD; Dobson, J; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, KB; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"We analysed outcomes in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme which randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF and a broad range of EF." | 5.13 | Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, CB; MacDonald, MR; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Varyani, F; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"Candesartan has a favorable effect on large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure." | 5.12 | Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program. ( Arnold, JM; Desai, SS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Marchiori, G; Mitchell, GF; O'Brien, TX; Pfeffer, MA; Warner, E, 2006) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme was designed as three parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in three different but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure." | 5.12 | Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Ostergren, JB, 2006) |
"We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs)." | 5.12 | Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Ducharme, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olsson, LG; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2006) |
"We assessed the effects of candesartan in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on N-terminal pro-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress as well as on glucose regulation in patients with heart failure (HF)." | 5.12 | Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure. ( Dabouz, F; De Denus, S; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Touyz, R; White, M; Whittom, L, 2007) |
"We compared outcomes in 2400 women and 5199 men randomized in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program using multivariable regression analyses." | 5.12 | Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Clayton, T; Granger, CB; McEntegart, MB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Piña, IL; Pocock, S; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"We examined the influence of BMI on prognosis using Cox proportional hazards models in 7599 patients (mean age, 65 years; 35% women) with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II to IV) and a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions (mean, 39%) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program." | 5.12 | Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, PV; Granger, CB; Kenchaiah, S; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, LA, 2007) |
"The objective of this study was to determine if adding spironolactone to an angiotensin II receptor blocker improves left ventricular (LV) function, mass, and volumes in chronic heart failure." | 5.12 | Aldosterone receptor antagonism induces reverse remodeling when added to angiotensin receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. ( Chan, AK; Chan, WW; Lam, W; Lam, YY; Sanderson, JE; So, N; Wang, M; Wang, T; Wong, JT; Wu, EB; Yeung, L; Yip, G; Yu, CM; Zhang, Y, 2007) |
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction." | 5.11 | Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004) |
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)." | 5.11 | Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, C; McMurray, J; Michelson, E; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, M; Solomon, S; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2004) |
"We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial." | 5.11 | Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; McMurray, JV; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, J; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"We studied 7599 patients with a broad spectrum of symptomatic heart failure enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program." | 5.11 | Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. ( Anavekar, N; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and significantly reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions for heart failure." | 5.10 | Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and reduced cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors." | 5.10 | Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"Candesartan has a moderate impact in preventing admissions for CHF among patients who have heart failure and LVEF higher than 40%." | 5.10 | Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003) |
"In parallel, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, candesartan (titrated to 32 mg once daily) was compared to placebo in 3 distinct populations: 1) patients with symptomatic heart failure (SHF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40% or less who were not receiving an ACE inhibitor because of previous intolerance (CHARM-Alternative); 2) patients with SHF and LVEF 40% or less who were currently receiving an ACE inhibitor (CHARM-Added); 3) patients with SHF and LVEF higher than 40% (CHARM-Preserved)." | 5.10 | [Clinical study of the month. The CHARM study]. ( Kulbertus, H, 2003) |
"Twenty-eight heart failure patients, who were on stable ACE inhibitor therapy, were randomised to receive adjunctive therapy with candesartan or placebo." | 5.10 | Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress. ( Anderson, RA; Blackman, DJ; Ellis, GR; Frenneaux, MP; Jackson, SK; Lang, D; Lewis, MJ; Morris-Thurgood, J; Mumford, C; Nightingale, AK; Penney, MD; Timmins, G, 2002) |
"We investigated the effects of candesartan (an angiotensin II antagonist) alone, enalapril alone, and their combination on exercise tolerance, ventricular function, quality of life (QOL), neurohormone levels, and tolerability in congestive heart failure (CHF)." | 5.09 | Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. ( Avezum, A; Burns, RJ; Latini, R; Maggioni, A; McKelvie, RS; Pericak, D; Pogue, J; Probstfield, J; Rouleau, J; Tsuyuki, RT; White, M; Young, J; Yusuf, S, 1999) |
"Examination of patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in the DIG (Digitalis Investigation Group) trials and the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) trials provides comparisons of outcomes in each of these types of heart failure." | 4.88 | What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE? ( Campbell, RT; Castagno, D; Hawkins, NM; Jhund, PS; McMurray, JJ; Petrie, MC, 2012) |
"The UK National Health Service (NHS) currently spends in excess of £250 million per annum on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure; with candesartan currently dominating the market." | 4.87 | Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis. ( Bodalia, PN; Grosso, AM; Hingorani, AD; Macallister, RJ; Moon, JC; Scott, MA, 2011) |
"Here, we systematically review and evaluate prospective clinical studies of RAS inhibitors enrolling patients with HF-PEF, including the 3 major trials of RAS inhibition (Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [CHARM-Preserved], Irbesartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction [I-PRESERVE], and Perindopril in Elderly People with Chronic Heart Failure [PEP-CHF])." | 4.86 | The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Desai, AS; Givertz, MM; Shah, RV, 2010) |
"Recent studies have shown candesartan to be an effective therapy for heart failure (HF) patients, producing a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity." | 4.85 | The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure. ( McKelvie, RS, 2009) |
" Candesartan, a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist, has been shown to be an effective, and well-tolerated therapy, in both the early and late phases of cardiovascular disease (prehypertension, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure)." | 4.84 | Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach. ( Barrios, V; Calderon, A; Escobar, C, 2007) |
"The CHARM programme, which recruited 7,601 patients, compared the angiotensin-receptor blocker, candesartan, with a placebo in three different populations with class II-VI heart failure." | 4.82 | [Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme]. ( Matsuzaki, M; Umemoto, S, 2004) |
"CHARM (candesartan in heart failure assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity) is the largest trial program in chronic heart failure." | 4.82 | [CHARM study--new strategy for the treatment of heart failure]. ( Hasegawa, H; Komuro, I, 2004) |
"The introduction of Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in 1995 was another milestone in the pharmacological management of hypertension." | 4.82 | [Angiotensin II receptor blockers--evidence along the cardiovascular continuum]. ( Battegay, E; Zeller, A, 2005) |
"Sacubitril/valsartan was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%." | 4.12 | Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective. ( Clark, J; Gandotra, C; Liu, Q; Rose, M; Senatore, FF; Stockbridge, NL; Zhang, J, 2022) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor." | 4.12 | Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme. ( Asselin, G; Barhdadi, A; Carss, K; Chazara, O; Cunningham, JW; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Granger, CB; Haefliger, C; Lemaçon, A; Lemieux Perreault, LP; McMurray, JJV; Mongrain, I; Paul, DS; Provost, S; Rouleau, J; Solomon, SD; Tardif, JC; Wang, Q; Yusuf, S, 2022) |
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i." | 3.91 | Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019) |
"Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; including candesartan, losartan, olmesartan and valsartan) are widely used to treat hypertension, heart failure and diabetic neuropathy." | 3.88 | Angiotensin receptor blocker use and gastro-oesophageal cancer survival: a population-based cohort study. ( Busby, J; Cardwell, CR; Hughes, C; Johnston, BT; McMenamin, Ú; Spence, A, 2018) |
"National reimbursement policies in Denmark were changed in November 2010 favouring a shift in angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment to generic losartan for heart failure (HF) patients." | 3.80 | Dosage of angiotensin-II receptor blockers in heart failure patients following changes in Danish drug reimbursement policies. ( Gislason, GH; Kristensen, SL; Køber, L; Lamberts, M; Selmer, C; Torp-Pedersen, C; von Kappelgaard, LM, 2014) |
"Compared with other angiotensin-receptor blockers, telmisartan and valsartan were both associated with a lower risk of admission to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure among older adults with diabetes and hypertension." | 3.79 | Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. ( Antoniou, T; Camacho, X; Gomes, T; Juurlink, DN; Mamdani, MM; Yao, Z, 2013) |
"To assess the hypothesis that losartan use is associated with increased all-cause mortality in heart failure patients as compared with candesartan." | 3.78 | Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure. ( Hviid, A; Pasternak, B; Svanström, H, 2012) |
" Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure." | 3.77 | [Remarkable results with candesartan]. ( Groenwold, RH; Rutten, FH, 2011) |
"UACR was measured at baseline and during follow-up of 2310 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Programme." | 3.75 | Albuminuria in chronic heart failure: prevalence and prognostic importance. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; Jackson, CE; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S; Zetterstrand, S, 2009) |
"Animals were randomized to rapid right ventricular-pacing (250 beats/min for 3 weeks) to severe heart failure and treated with candesartan (10 mg/kg daily, n = 8) or placebo (n = 8) from day 3 onwards, or no pacing (sham, n = 7)." | 3.74 | Selective type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates oxidative stress and regulates angiotensin II receptors in the canine failing heart. ( Jugdutt, BI; Konig, A; Liu, P; Moe, G, 2008) |
"In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP." | 3.74 | Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program. ( Anand, I; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Meredith, PA; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"Patients with symptomatic HF (NYHA Class II-IV) enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) HRQL study completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire at randomization." | 3.74 | Characterization of health-related quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved versus low ejection fraction in CHARM. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Halling, K; Lamas, GA; Lewis, EF; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"The Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme randomised 7599 patients with symptomatic HF to receive candesartan or placebo." | 3.74 | Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme. ( Dunn, FG; Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"Elderly patients with heart failure who were prescribed losartan had worse survival rates compared with those prescribed other commonly used ARBs." | 3.74 | Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect? ( Behlouli, H; Hudson, M; Humphries, K; Pilote, L; Sheppard, R; Tu, JV, 2007) |
"All 2,679 symptomatic chronic heart failure patients from the North American CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) program had a wide range of laboratory measures performed at a core facility, enabling us to assess the relationship between routine blood tests and outcomes using a Cox proportional hazards model." | 3.74 | Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank. ( Allen, LA; Felker, GM; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Shaw, LK; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"Participants in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) (n = 7,599) Program were randomized to standard heart failure therapy plus candesartan or placebo, titrated as tolerated to a target of 32 mg once daily with recommended monitoring of serum potassium and creatinine." | 3.74 | Incidence and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure: an analysis of the CHARM Program. ( Desai, AS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Hainer, JW; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"Rabbits subjected to ventricular tachypacing at 380 to 400 bpm for 4 weeks in the absence and presence of treatment with pioglitazone, candesartan, and combined pioglitazone and candesartan were assessed by electrophysiologic study, atrial fibrosis measurements, and cytokine expression analyses." | 3.74 | Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure. ( Harata, S; Inden, Y; Kitamura, K; Murohara, T; Nattel, S; Shimano, M; Tsuji, Y; Uchikawa, T, 2008) |
" We found in a previous study that some types of DRP were degraded and that calpain content was increased in rats with non-genetically induced heart failure." | 3.73 | Effects of ACE inhibitor and AT1 blocker on dystrophin-related proteins and calpain in failing heart. ( Daicho, T; Koshimizu, M; Oikawa, R; Takahashi, M; Takeo, S; Tanonaka, K; Toyo-Oka, T; Yoshida, H, 2005) |
"The CHARM program was designed as 3 separate randomized trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who (1) were intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =0." | 3.73 | The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Hennekens, CH; Pocock, S; Wang, D; Wilhelmsen, L, 2005) |
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on patients' perception of symptoms, using the McMaster Overall treatment evaluation (OTE), in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)." | 3.73 | Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, C; Lewis, E; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, J; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"This study was designed to examine the hypothesis that a calcium channel blocker nifedipine (CCB) could enhance the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-ll receptor blocker candesartan (ARB) in the treatment for heart failure." | 3.73 | Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure. ( Hayashi, T; Horimoto, H; Inamoto, S; Kitaura, Y; Mieno, S; Mori, T; Okabe, M; Okuda, N, 2005) |
"To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure." | 3.73 | Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. ( Demers, C; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005) |
"The Candesartan in Heart Failure:Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program consisted of three component trials that enrolled patients with symptomatic CHF, based on use of ACE inhibitors and reduced (< or =40%) or preserved LVEF (>40%)." | 3.73 | Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure. ( Cornel, JH; de Zeeuw, D; Granger, CB; Hillege, HL; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Nitsch, D; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; van Veldhuisen, DJ; Yusuf, S, 2006) |
"To determine whether angiotensin receptor blockade decreases vascular tone in heart failure by improving endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation and increasing nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, we treated infarcted adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with candesartan for 7 days or 8 weeks (10 mg/kg/day in drinking water)." | 3.72 | Angiotensin subtype 1 rReceptor (AT1) blockade improves vasorelaxation in heart failure by up-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase via activation of the AT2 receptor. ( Gaballa, M; Goldman, S; Thai, H; Wollmuth, J, 2003) |
"An 89-year-old man with severe hypertension (190/82 mm Hg) and chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II) despite treatment with benidipine, doxazosin mesylate (INN, doxazosin), and furosemide was given oral candesartan cilexetil (4 mg/d), an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker metabolized via cytochrome p450 (CYP) 2C9." | 3.72 | Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype. ( Hashimoto, H; Hayashi, H; Nishio, S; Ohashi, K; Uchida, S; Watanabe, H; Yamazaki, K, 2003) |
"The goal of this study was to determine whether an Angiotensin II receptor antagonist, candesartan, prevents myocardial fibrosis more effectively than enalapril in animals with a non-ACE pathway during the progression of congestive heart failure (CHF)." | 3.72 | Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure. ( Dohi, K; Funabiki, K; Imanaka-Yoshida, K; Ito, M; Kitamura, T; Koji, T; Nakano, T; Nobori, T; Onishi, K, 2004) |
"The large Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) trial recently found that in patients with heart failure who were similar to those whom clinicians see in everyday practice, the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan was not only an acceptable alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, but also was beneficial when added to regimens that already included ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers." | 3.72 | Angiotensin-receptor blockers in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM trial. ( Bhakta, S; Dunlap, ME, 2004) |
"Candesartan has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events when therapy was started 6 months after PCI with bare-metal stents in patients who survived restenosis." | 2.82 | Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial. ( Hokimoto, S; Kikuta, K; Kimura, K; Koide, S; Matsui, K; Matsumura, T; Nakao, K; Ogawa, H; Oka, H; Oshima, S; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, H; Tsujita, K; Yamamoto, N, 2016) |
"HD candesartan was more effective in improving plasma BNP levels and cardiac function than LD in Japanese CHF patients." | 2.78 | Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. ( Matsuzaki, M; Miyata, Y; Nakamura, K; Nakata, E; Sugiura, K; Tsutsui, H; Yamamoto, K; Yano, M, 2013) |
" Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more frequent in the candesartan group: placebo/candesartan risk (%), lowest compared with highest age category: hyperkalemia (0." | 2.73 | Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme. ( Cohen-Solal, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008) |
"Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG LVH) is a powerful independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension." | 2.73 | Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme. ( Dunn, FG; Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007) |
"Candesartan treatment reduced primary end point risk (5." | 2.71 | Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. ( Kondo, J; Kono, T; Kosaka, T; Matsui, H; Morishima, I; Mukawa, H; Murohara, T; Numaguchi, Y; Okumura, K; Sone, T; Tsuboi, H; Uesugi, M; Yoshida, T, 2003) |
"The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome." | 2.43 | Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006) |
"Candesartan is a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist that is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with insurmountable receptor binding abilities." | 2.43 | Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006) |
"Candesartan cilexetil is a nonpeptide selective blocker of the angiotensin II receptor sub-type 1." | 2.43 | Candesartan in heart failure. ( Chonlahan, JS; Germany, RE; Ripley, TL, 2006) |
"Candesartan is a selective angiotensin II Type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker which binds tightly to, and dissociates slowly from the receptor." | 2.42 | Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. ( Ostergren, J, 2004) |
" Data are reviewed to demonstrate that ACE escape reflects inadequate ACE dosage rather than a decrease in ACE inhibition occurring with time." | 2.41 | Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure. ( Berlowitz, M; Ennezat, PV; Le Jemtel, TH; Sonnenblick, EH, 2000) |
"Their use in congestive heart failure and renal disease is under investigation." | 2.40 | Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy. ( Kirk, JK, 1999) |
" Considering these factors, a more individualized approach of candesartan dosing should be investigated in patients with HF." | 1.62 | Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. ( Bonnefois, G; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Kassem, I; Li, J; Nekka, F; Rouleau, JL; Sanche, S; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2021) |
"Chronic isoproterenol (ISO)-induced cardiac hypertrophy was inhibited in wild-type mice and AT1aR(-/-) mice treated with the ARB Candesartan (CV11974)." | 1.36 | Effects of angiotensin type I receptor blockade on the cardiac Raf/MEK/ERK cascade activated via adrenergic receptors. ( Kimura, S; Matsuyoshi, H; Murao, K; Obata, K; Takaki, M; Yu, X; Zhang, GX, 2010) |
"Candesartan treatment significantly reversed the increases in both AQP2 and p-AQP2 expression and targeting." | 1.35 | Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade. ( Frøkiaer, J; Jonassen, T; Kim, SW; Knepper, MA; Kwon, TH; Lütken, SC; Marples, D; Nielsen, S, 2009) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 3 (1.52) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 138 (70.05) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 49 (24.87) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 7 (3.55) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Gandotra, C | 1 |
Clark, J | 1 |
Liu, Q | 1 |
Senatore, FF | 1 |
Rose, M | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Stockbridge, NL | 1 |
Dubé, MP | 4 |
Chazara, O | 1 |
Lemaçon, A | 1 |
Asselin, G | 1 |
Provost, S | 2 |
Barhdadi, A | 1 |
Lemieux Perreault, LP | 1 |
Mongrain, I | 2 |
Wang, Q | 1 |
Carss, K | 1 |
Paul, DS | 1 |
Cunningham, JW | 2 |
Rouleau, J | 3 |
Solomon, SD | 30 |
McMurray, JJV | 6 |
Yusuf, S | 51 |
Granger, CB | 46 |
Haefliger, C | 1 |
de Denus, S | 5 |
Tardif, JC | 3 |
Murray, EJ | 1 |
Claggett, BL | 2 |
Granger, B | 1 |
Hernán, MA | 1 |
Kuno, T | 1 |
Ueyama, H | 1 |
Fujisaki, T | 1 |
Briasouli, A | 1 |
Takagi, H | 1 |
Briasoulis, A | 1 |
Vaduganathan, M | 1 |
John, JE | 1 |
Desai, AS | 6 |
Lewis, EF | 2 |
Zile, MR | 5 |
Carson, P | 1 |
Jhund, PS | 9 |
Kober, L | 1 |
Pitt, B | 3 |
Shah, SJ | 1 |
Swedberg, K | 51 |
Anand, IS | 3 |
Pfeffer, MA | 46 |
Kassem, I | 1 |
Sanche, S | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Bonnefois, G | 1 |
Rouleau, JL | 9 |
White, M | 8 |
Turgeon, J | 3 |
Nekka, F | 1 |
Shen, L | 2 |
Carson, PE | 3 |
Køber, L | 4 |
Komajda, M | 4 |
McKelvie, RS | 15 |
Bramblett, T | 1 |
Teleb, M | 1 |
Albaghdadi, A | 1 |
Agrawal, H | 1 |
Mukherjee, D | 1 |
Busby, J | 1 |
McMenamin, Ú | 1 |
Spence, A | 1 |
Johnston, BT | 1 |
Hughes, C | 1 |
Cardwell, CR | 1 |
Wolsk, E | 1 |
Claggett, B | 4 |
Pocock, S | 10 |
Lund, LH | 2 |
Liu, J | 2 |
Lam, CS | 1 |
Rosano, GM | 1 |
Fouodjio, R | 1 |
Huynh, T | 1 |
LeBlanc, MH | 3 |
Lepage, S | 3 |
Sheppard, R | 2 |
Giannetti, N | 1 |
Lavoie, J | 3 |
Mansour, A | 1 |
Normand, V | 1 |
Langlois, M | 1 |
O'Meara, E | 6 |
Ducharme, A | 6 |
Racine, N | 3 |
Guertin, MC | 1 |
Phillips, MS | 1 |
Konstam, MA | 1 |
Takahama, H | 1 |
Asakura, M | 1 |
Abe, Y | 1 |
Ajioka, M | 1 |
Aonuma, K | 1 |
Anzai, T | 2 |
Hayashi, T | 2 |
Hiramitsu, S | 2 |
Kawai, H | 1 |
Kioka, H | 1 |
Kimura, K | 2 |
Lim, YJ | 1 |
Matsuoka, K | 1 |
Motoki, H | 1 |
Nagata, Y | 1 |
Nakamura, S | 1 |
Ohte, N | 1 |
Ozaki, Y | 1 |
Sasaoka, T | 1 |
Tamaki, S | 1 |
Hamasaki, T | 1 |
Kitakaze, M | 3 |
Rickenbacher, P | 1 |
Docherty, KF | 1 |
Petrie, MC | 6 |
Matsuzaki, M | 4 |
Yamamoto, K | 1 |
Yano, M | 2 |
Nakamura, K | 1 |
Miyata, Y | 1 |
Sugiura, K | 1 |
Nakata, E | 1 |
Tsutsui, H | 3 |
Sato, Y | 2 |
Antoniou, T | 1 |
Camacho, X | 1 |
Yao, Z | 1 |
Gomes, T | 1 |
Juurlink, DN | 1 |
Mamdani, MM | 1 |
Wong, CM | 2 |
Hawkins, NM | 6 |
MacDonald, MR | 2 |
McMurray, JJ | 45 |
Bello, NA | 1 |
Selmer, C | 1 |
Lamberts, M | 1 |
Kristensen, SL | 2 |
von Kappelgaard, LM | 1 |
Gislason, GH | 1 |
Torp-Pedersen, C | 1 |
Vazir, A | 1 |
Jhund, P | 1 |
Castagno, D | 3 |
Skali, H | 6 |
Kjekshus, J | 2 |
Wikstrand, J | 2 |
Wedel, H | 1 |
Rossignol, P | 1 |
Zannad, F | 1 |
McMurray, J | 5 |
Packer, M | 1 |
Desai, A | 1 |
Gong, J | 1 |
Greenlaw, N | 1 |
Lefkowitz, M | 1 |
Rizkala, A | 1 |
Shi, V | 1 |
Solomon, S | 2 |
Andersen, K | 1 |
Arango, JL | 1 |
Arnold, M | 1 |
Bĕlohlávek, J | 1 |
Böhm, M | 1 |
Boytsov, S | 1 |
Burgess, L | 1 |
Cabrera, W | 1 |
Chen, CH | 1 |
Erglis, A | 1 |
Fu, M | 1 |
Gomez, E | 1 |
Gonzalez, A | 1 |
Hagege, AA | 1 |
Katova, T | 1 |
Kiatchoosakun, S | 1 |
Kim, KS | 1 |
Bayram, E | 1 |
Martinez, F | 1 |
Merkely, B | 1 |
Mendoza, I | 1 |
Mosterd, A | 1 |
Negrusz-Kawecka, M | 1 |
Peuhkurinen, K | 1 |
Ramires, F | 1 |
Refsgaard, J | 1 |
Senni, M | 1 |
Sibulo, AS | 1 |
Silva-Cardoso, J | 1 |
Squire, I | 1 |
Starling, RC | 1 |
Vinereanu, D | 1 |
Teerlink, JR | 1 |
Wong, R | 1 |
Badar, AA | 1 |
Perez-Moreno, AC | 1 |
Brunton, AP | 1 |
Gardner, RS | 1 |
Abdul-Rahim, AH | 1 |
Perez, AC | 1 |
Fulton, RL | 1 |
Latini, R | 4 |
Tognoni, G | 1 |
Lip, GY | 1 |
Maggioni, AP | 8 |
Tavazzi, L | 1 |
Lees, KR | 1 |
Sakamoto, T | 1 |
Ogawa, H | 2 |
Nakao, K | 1 |
Hokimoto, S | 1 |
Tsujita, K | 1 |
Koide, S | 1 |
Yamamoto, N | 1 |
Shimomura, H | 1 |
Matsumura, T | 1 |
Oshima, S | 1 |
Kikuta, K | 1 |
Oka, H | 1 |
Matsui, K | 1 |
Takahashi, F | 1 |
Goto, M | 1 |
Wada, Y | 2 |
Hasebe, N | 1 |
Damman, K | 1 |
Young, JB | 12 |
Moe, G | 1 |
Konig, A | 1 |
Liu, P | 1 |
Jugdutt, BI | 1 |
Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M | 1 |
Bélanger, F | 1 |
Gossard, D | 2 |
Whittom, L | 2 |
Touyz, RM | 1 |
Colombo, GL | 1 |
Caruggi, M | 1 |
Ottolini, C | 1 |
Pocock, SJ | 8 |
Dobson, J | 3 |
Michelson, EL | 33 |
Ostergren, J | 19 |
Anker, SD | 1 |
Swedberg, KB | 1 |
Cohen-Solal, A | 4 |
Puu, M | 5 |
Abrahamsson, P | 1 |
Pfeffer, M | 2 |
Meredith, PA | 1 |
Anand, I | 1 |
Olofsson, B | 17 |
Clodi, M | 1 |
Resl, M | 1 |
Stelzeneder, D | 1 |
Pacini, G | 1 |
Tura, A | 1 |
Mörtl, D | 1 |
Struck, J | 1 |
Morgenthaler, NG | 1 |
Bergmann, A | 1 |
Riedl, M | 1 |
Anderwald-Stadler, M | 1 |
Luger, A | 1 |
Pacher, R | 1 |
Hülsmann, M | 1 |
Mills, RM | 1 |
Afzal, R | 3 |
Floras, J | 2 |
Kasanuki, H | 1 |
Hagiwara, N | 1 |
Hosoda, S | 1 |
Sumiyoshi, T | 1 |
Honda, T | 1 |
Haze, K | 1 |
Nagashima, M | 1 |
Yamaguchi, J | 1 |
Origasa, H | 1 |
Urashima, M | 1 |
Jackson, CE | 1 |
Gerstein, HC | 2 |
Zetterstrand, S | 1 |
Mehta, PA | 1 |
McDonagh, S | 1 |
Phillips, J | 1 |
Grocott-Mason, R | 1 |
Dubrey, SW | 1 |
Lütken, SC | 1 |
Kim, SW | 1 |
Jonassen, T | 1 |
Marples, D | 1 |
Knepper, MA | 1 |
Kwon, TH | 1 |
Frøkiaer, J | 1 |
Nielsen, S | 1 |
Shah, RV | 1 |
Givertz, MM | 1 |
Wang, D | 10 |
Chang, SM | 1 |
Johansson, PA | 2 |
Kosolcharoen, P | 1 |
Murray, DR | 1 |
Dunlap, ME | 7 |
Zhang, GX | 1 |
Kimura, S | 1 |
Murao, K | 1 |
Yu, X | 1 |
Obata, K | 1 |
Matsuyoshi, H | 1 |
Takaki, M | 1 |
Suzuki, H | 3 |
Araki, R | 1 |
Massie, BM | 1 |
Eklind-Cervenka, M | 1 |
Benson, L | 1 |
Dahlström, U | 2 |
Edner, M | 1 |
Rosenqvist, M | 1 |
Grosso, AM | 1 |
Bodalia, PN | 1 |
Macallister, RJ | 1 |
Hingorani, AD | 1 |
Moon, JC | 1 |
Scott, MA | 1 |
Minhas, R | 1 |
Julius, S | 1 |
Rutten, FH | 1 |
Groenwold, RH | 1 |
Fruhwald, F | 1 |
Pieske, B | 1 |
Kaplan, N | 1 |
Oghlakian, GO | 1 |
Sipahi, I | 1 |
Fang, JC | 1 |
Kobayashi, D | 1 |
Murakami, S | 1 |
Oda, M | 1 |
Hanawa, H | 1 |
Kuroda, T | 1 |
Nakano, M | 1 |
Narita, I | 1 |
Desai, RJ | 1 |
Ashton, CM | 1 |
Deswal, A | 1 |
Morgan, RO | 1 |
Mehta, HB | 1 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Aparasu, RR | 1 |
Johnson, ML | 1 |
Ariti, CA | 2 |
Collier, TJ | 1 |
Suzuki, O | 1 |
Ishii, H | 1 |
Kobayashi, S | 1 |
Cleland, JG | 1 |
Svanström, H | 1 |
Pasternak, B | 1 |
Hviid, A | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Joffe, MM | 1 |
Takeuchi, M | 1 |
Howlett, JG | 1 |
Campbell, RT | 1 |
Shimizu, T | 1 |
Komuro, I | 5 |
Hirayama, H | 1 |
Shimizu, K | 1 |
Yoshida, O | 1 |
Shinohara, H | 2 |
Fukuda, N | 1 |
Soeki, T | 1 |
Sakabe, K | 1 |
Onose, Y | 1 |
Tamura, Y | 1 |
Kinugawa, K | 1 |
Takahashi, T | 1 |
Nagai, R | 1 |
Terra, SG | 1 |
Gschwend, S | 1 |
Henning, RH | 1 |
Pinto, YM | 2 |
de Zeeuw, D | 2 |
van Gilst, WH | 2 |
Buikema, H | 1 |
White, HD | 1 |
Held, P | 5 |
Umemoto, S | 2 |
Kawahara, S | 1 |
Hashimoto, R | 1 |
Thai, H | 1 |
Wollmuth, J | 1 |
Goldman, S | 1 |
Gaballa, M | 1 |
Uchida, S | 1 |
Watanabe, H | 1 |
Nishio, S | 1 |
Hashimoto, H | 1 |
Yamazaki, K | 1 |
Hayashi, H | 1 |
Ohashi, K | 1 |
Winkler, G | 1 |
Jermendy, G | 1 |
Matos, L | 1 |
Stergren, J | 1 |
Owen, OG | 1 |
Pechlaner, C | 1 |
Gama, MG | 1 |
Rocha, G | 1 |
Mansour, J | 1 |
Peltier, M | 1 |
Oprisiu, R | 1 |
Achard, JM | 1 |
Fournier, A | 1 |
Möller, BH | 1 |
Penston, J | 1 |
Kondo, J | 1 |
Sone, T | 1 |
Tsuboi, H | 1 |
Mukawa, H | 1 |
Morishima, I | 1 |
Uesugi, M | 1 |
Kono, T | 1 |
Kosaka, T | 1 |
Yoshida, T | 1 |
Numaguchi, Y | 1 |
Matsui, H | 1 |
Murohara, T | 2 |
Okumura, K | 1 |
Kulbertus, H | 1 |
Masson, S | 2 |
Staszewsky, L | 1 |
Matsumori, A | 1 |
Fujita, T | 1 |
Mizukami, M | 1 |
Hasegawa, H | 2 |
Kohro, T | 1 |
Toko, H | 1 |
Kudoh, S | 1 |
Zou, Y | 1 |
Aburatani, H | 1 |
Füessl, HS | 1 |
Persson, H | 1 |
Yasumura, Y | 1 |
Miyatake, K | 1 |
Okamoto, H | 1 |
Miyauchi, T | 1 |
Kawana, M | 1 |
Tsutamoto, T | 1 |
Matsubara, H | 1 |
Takaoka, H | 1 |
Himeno, H | 1 |
Yokoyama, H | 1 |
Yokoya, K | 1 |
Shintani, U | 1 |
Hashimoto, K | 1 |
Koretsune, Y | 1 |
Nakamura, Y | 1 |
Imai, K | 1 |
Maruyama, S | 1 |
Masaoka, Y | 1 |
Sekiya, M | 1 |
Shiraki, T | 1 |
Ozono, K | 1 |
Matsuoka, T | 1 |
Miyao, Y | 1 |
Nomura, F | 1 |
Onishi, K | 1 |
Dohi, K | 1 |
Koji, T | 1 |
Funabiki, K | 1 |
Kitamura, T | 1 |
Imanaka-Yoshida, K | 1 |
Ito, M | 1 |
Nobori, T | 1 |
Nakano, T | 1 |
Kumagai, H | 1 |
Onami, T | 1 |
Takimoto, C | 1 |
Iigaya, K | 1 |
Saruta, T | 1 |
Tambara, K | 1 |
Fujita, M | 1 |
Sumita, Y | 1 |
Miyamoto, S | 1 |
Sekiguchi, H | 1 |
Eiho, S | 1 |
Komeda, M | 1 |
Kochsiek, K | 1 |
de Boer, RA | 1 |
Pokharel, S | 1 |
Flesch, M | 1 |
van Kampen, DA | 1 |
Suurmeijer, AJ | 1 |
Boomsma, F | 1 |
van Veldhuisen, DJ | 4 |
Dietz, R | 4 |
Fuchs, SA | 1 |
Meyboom, RH | 1 |
van Puijenbroek, EP | 1 |
Guchelaar, HJ | 1 |
Bhakta, S | 1 |
Stehlik, J | 1 |
Taylor, DO | 1 |
Finn, P | 1 |
Zornoff, L | 1 |
Michelson, E | 1 |
Granger, C | 2 |
Takahashi, M | 1 |
Tanonaka, K | 1 |
Yoshida, H | 1 |
Oikawa, R | 1 |
Koshimizu, M | 1 |
Daicho, T | 1 |
Toyo-Oka, T | 1 |
Takeo, S | 1 |
Kasama, S | 2 |
Toyama, T | 2 |
Kumakura, H | 2 |
Takayama, Y | 2 |
Ichikawa, S | 2 |
Suzuki, T | 2 |
Kurabayashi, M | 2 |
Kuwabara, Y | 1 |
Doggrell, SA | 1 |
Mitrovic, V | 2 |
Erhardt, LR | 1 |
Zeller, A | 1 |
Battegay, E | 1 |
Wilhelmsen, L | 1 |
Hennekens, CH | 2 |
Lewis, E | 1 |
Probstfield, JL | 2 |
Carlsson, J | 2 |
Ostergren, JB | 2 |
Probstfield, J | 2 |
McMurray, JV | 1 |
Wake, R | 1 |
Kim-Mitsuyama, S | 1 |
Izumi, Y | 1 |
Yoshida, K | 1 |
Izumiya, Y | 1 |
Yukimura, T | 1 |
Shiota, M | 1 |
Yoshiyama, M | 1 |
Yoshikawa, J | 1 |
Iwao, H | 1 |
Eichhorn, E | 1 |
Erhardt, L | 1 |
Hobbs, FD | 1 |
Krum, H | 1 |
Maggioni, A | 2 |
Piña, IL | 2 |
Soler-Soler, J | 1 |
Yan, RT | 1 |
Yan, AT | 1 |
Hall, C | 1 |
Kanno, Y | 2 |
Nakamura, T | 1 |
Takenaka, T | 1 |
Okuda, N | 1 |
Mori, T | 1 |
Inamoto, S | 1 |
Okabe, M | 1 |
Mieno, S | 1 |
Horimoto, H | 1 |
Kitaura, Y | 1 |
Mitchell, GF | 1 |
Arnold, JM | 1 |
O'Brien, TX | 1 |
Marchiori, G | 1 |
Warner, E | 1 |
Desai, SS | 1 |
Demers, C | 2 |
Barrios Alonso, V | 1 |
Escobar Cervantes, C | 1 |
Calderón Montero, A | 1 |
Anavekar, N | 1 |
Hillege, HL | 1 |
Nitsch, D | 1 |
Cornel, JH | 1 |
Clayton, T | 2 |
McEntegart, MB | 2 |
Lang, CC | 1 |
Roger, SD | 1 |
Wuerzner, G | 1 |
Burnier, M | 1 |
Olsson, L | 2 |
Hainer, J | 1 |
Earle, S | 1 |
Olsson, LG | 1 |
Tokuhisa, T | 1 |
Obayashi, M | 1 |
Noma, T | 1 |
Mochizuki, M | 1 |
Oda, T | 1 |
Okuda, S | 1 |
Doi, M | 1 |
Ikeda, Y | 1 |
Yamamoto, T | 1 |
Ohkusa, T | 1 |
Andersson, FL | 1 |
Stewart, S | 1 |
Svensson, K | 1 |
Solal, AC | 1 |
Vanhaecke, J | 1 |
Kowalczykowski, M | 1 |
Hollar, D | 1 |
Dunn, FG | 2 |
Momomura, S | 1 |
Tschöpe, C | 1 |
Schultheiss, HP | 1 |
Lamas, GA | 1 |
Halling, K | 1 |
Hudson, M | 1 |
Humphries, K | 1 |
Tu, JV | 1 |
Behlouli, H | 1 |
Pilote, L | 1 |
Dabouz, F | 1 |
Touyz, R | 1 |
Kudo, Y | 1 |
Akazawa, H | 1 |
Kinugawa, S | 2 |
Matsushima, S | 1 |
Ide, T | 1 |
Inoue, N | 1 |
Ohta, Y | 1 |
Yokota, T | 1 |
Hamaguchi, S | 1 |
Sunagawa, K | 1 |
Felker, GM | 1 |
Allen, LA | 1 |
Shaw, LK | 1 |
Kenchaiah, S | 1 |
Finn, PV | 1 |
Zornoff, LA | 1 |
Chan, AK | 1 |
Sanderson, JE | 1 |
Wang, T | 1 |
Lam, W | 1 |
Yip, G | 1 |
Wang, M | 1 |
Lam, YY | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Yeung, L | 1 |
Wu, EB | 1 |
Chan, WW | 1 |
Wong, JT | 1 |
So, N | 1 |
Yu, CM | 1 |
Gremmler, B | 1 |
Kisters, K | 1 |
Kunert, M | 1 |
Schleiting, H | 1 |
Ulbricht, LJ | 1 |
Barrios, V | 1 |
Escobar, C | 1 |
Calderon, A | 1 |
Hainer, JW | 1 |
Sumino, H | 1 |
Matsumoto, N | 1 |
Ripley, TL | 1 |
Chonlahan, JS | 1 |
Germany, RE | 1 |
Weir, RA | 1 |
Shimano, M | 1 |
Tsuji, Y | 1 |
Inden, Y | 1 |
Kitamura, K | 1 |
Uchikawa, T | 1 |
Harata, S | 1 |
Nattel, S | 1 |
Wilson, LD | 1 |
Tsai, CT | 1 |
Varyani, F | 1 |
Kageyama, S | 1 |
Kirk, JK | 1 |
Pericak, D | 1 |
Avezum, A | 1 |
Burns, RJ | 1 |
Tsuyuki, RT | 1 |
Young, J | 1 |
Pogue, J | 1 |
Riegger, GA | 1 |
Voors, AA | 1 |
Rapezzi, C | 1 |
Ennezat, PV | 1 |
Berlowitz, M | 1 |
Sonnenblick, EH | 1 |
Le Jemtel, TH | 1 |
Martineau, P | 1 |
Goulet, J | 1 |
DiBona, GF | 1 |
Jones, SY | 1 |
Fruhwald, FM | 1 |
Kickenweiz, E | 1 |
Zweiker, R | 1 |
Klein, W | 1 |
Negassa, A | 1 |
Vaile, JC | 1 |
Chowdhary, S | 1 |
Osman, F | 1 |
Ross, HF | 1 |
Fletcher, J | 1 |
Littler, WA | 1 |
Coote, JH | 1 |
Townend, JN | 1 |
Ellis, GR | 1 |
Nightingale, AK | 1 |
Blackman, DJ | 1 |
Anderson, RA | 1 |
Mumford, C | 1 |
Timmins, G | 1 |
Lang, D | 1 |
Jackson, SK | 1 |
Penney, MD | 1 |
Lewis, MJ | 1 |
Frenneaux, MP | 1 |
Morris-Thurgood, J | 1 |
Willenbrock, R | 1 |
Philipp, S | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candesartan in Heart Fail. Assess. of Reduction in Mortality & Morbidity. Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure Who Are ACE Inhibitor Intolerant and Have Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634400] | Phase 3 | 6,268 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 1999-03-31 | Completed | ||
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302] | Phase 3 | 3,445 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-08-31 | Completed | ||
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634712] | Phase 3 | 734 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 1999-06-30 | Completed | ||
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238] | Phase 3 | 4,128 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-06-30 | Completed | ||
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634309] | Phase 3 | 597 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 1999-06-30 | Completed | ||
Effect of ACE Inhibitor Plus High Dose Candesartan on BNP and Inflammation in Patients With LV Dysfunction: Impact of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System Genetic Polymorphisms[NCT00400582] | Phase 4 | 300 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2006-11-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction[NCT01035255] | Phase 3 | 8,442 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-12-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Early termination was approved due to compelling efficacy of LCZ696 in patients with HF & reduced EF after final pre-specified interim analysis 28-Mar-2014.) | ||
Effects of APIXaban on BRAIN Protection in Patients With Sinus Rhythm and Heart Failure: APIXBRAIN-HF Trial[NCT04696120] | Phase 2 | 200 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-03-02 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Patients With Hypertension After Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Implantation[NCT00139386] | Phase 4 | 1,119 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-10-31 | Completed | ||
PRospectIve Study of Sacubitril/ValsarTan on MyocardIal OxygenatioN and Fibrosis in PatiEnts With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT04128891] | Phase 3 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-02-01 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not approved) | ||
Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03837470] | Early Phase 1 | 14 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-05-06 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Convalescent Plasma for Adults With COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Double-blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Placebo-controlled Trial[NCT04345289] | Phase 3 | 147 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-05-01 | Terminated (stopped due to DSMB advise due to high probability of futility) | ||
An Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Novel Mobile Health Monitoring Platform to Capture Patient-centered Outcomes Measures Among Patients With Heart Failure (HF)[NCT04191356] | 67 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2020-10-17 | Terminated (stopped due to Collected enough data to support the Endpoints) | |||
Phase 2/3 Study of Effect of AT1RB Versus ACE Inhibitor in Addition to XO Inhibitor on Progression of LV Remodeling and Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients With Acute MI.[NCT01052272] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 72 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Study of the MitraClip Device in Heart Failure Patients With Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation[NCT01772108] | 42 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Terminated (stopped due to As recruitment rate was lower than anticipated) | |||
Mechanisms and Management of Exercise Intolerance in Older Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03111017] | 12 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-04-17 | Completed | |||
Randomized Clinical Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction for Reduced Healthcare Utilization[NCT04327596] | 2 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-01-25 | Terminated (stopped due to lack of enrollment) | |||
Effect of Dapagliflozin on Metabolomics and Cardiac Mechanics in Chronic Kidney Disease[NCT05719714] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-11-01 | Recruiting | ||
Efficacy of Intravenous Levosimendan Compared With Dobutamine on Renal Hemodynamics and Function in Chronic Heart Failure[NCT02133105] | Phase 3 | 33 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-04-30 | Completed | ||
Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure: Etiology, Comparisons With Renal Disease, and Relationships With Biomarkers and Left Ventricular Remodeling.[NCT00834691] | 180 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2008-01-31 | Completed | |||
Confirm Rx Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Primary Atrial Fibrillation Detection in High Risk Heart Failure Patients[NCT04818645] | 477 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-01-31 | Recruiting | |||
Prognostic Value of Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Neonatal Sepsis in Patients Admitted at Assiut University Children Hospital.[NCT03403062] | 100 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2019-02-28 | Not yet recruiting | |||
Gender Specific Registry in Subjects Hospitalized With Heart Failure in Santiago( GENESIS Registry): Pilot Heart Failure Registry Looking for Sex Analysis[NCT05960968] | 500 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2023-08-11 | Recruiting | |||
A Randomized Study of Pocket Ultrasound Derived IVC Diameter for Guided Management of Heart Failure[NCT01962688] | 37 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-31 | Terminated (stopped due to low enrollment) | |||
Effects of a Physical Therapist-driven Individualized Hybrid Model of the Exercise Component of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes: a Prospective Cohort Study[NCT06030115] | 100 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2019-07-01 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.09 |
Spironolactone | 0.05 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 4.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.1 |
Spironolactone | 2.8 |
Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.2 |
Spironolactone | 5.5 |
Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 102.33 |
Spironolactone | 102.26 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.8 |
Spironolactone | 7.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.9 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 5.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.1 |
First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.2 |
Spironolactone | 3.2 |
First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.4 |
Spironolactone | 1.4 |
Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 67.50 |
Spironolactone | 65.20 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 20.0 |
Spironolactone | 18.8 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 3.8 |
First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.7 |
Spironolactone | 0.7 |
Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.32 |
Spironolactone | 4.49 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.2 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 65.9 |
Spironolactone | 66.4 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 63.1 |
Spironolactone | 64.4 |
Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.11 |
Spironolactone | 1.17 |
Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 140.95 |
Spironolactone | 140.33 |
First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 8.3 |
Spironolactone | 6.8 |
Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | pg/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo - Month 6 | 0.98 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 0.93 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 1.00 |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 1.01 |
NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 10 - Improved | Month 10 - Unchanged | Month 10 - Worsened | Month 10 - Major Event | Month 10 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined | 936 | 966 | 48 | 10 | 107 | 948 | 911 | 58 | 41 | 109 | 933 | 866 | 61 | 75 | 132 | 928 | 658 | 97 | 324 | 60 |
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II | 55 | 310 | 41 | 2 | 18 | 44 | 294 | 53 | 10 | 25 | 38 | 287 | 50 | 22 | 29 | 42 | 230 | 68 | 75 | 11 |
Irbesartan Class III or IV | 881 | 656 | 7 | 8 | 89 | 904 | 617 | 5 | 31 | 84 | 895 | 579 | 11 | 53 | 103 | 886 | 428 | 29 | 249 | 49 |
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined | 881 | 1016 | 51 | 14 | 98 | 902 | 939 | 71 | 42 | 106 | 902 | 890 | 69 | 80 | 119 | 882 | 694 | 107 | 320 | 57 |
Placebo Baseline Class I or II | 47 | 338 | 47 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 317 | 63 | 9 | 14 | 39 | 312 | 62 | 16 | 16 | 42 | 254 | 78 | 66 | 5 |
Placebo Class III or IV | 834 | 678 | 4 | 12 | 87 | 860 | 622 | 8 | 33 | 92 | 863 | 578 | 7 | 64 | 103 | 840 | 440 | 29 | 254 | 52 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 18 | 73.49 | 68.00 | -5.50 |
Irbesartan - Month 30 | 74.37 | 67.05 | -7.12 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 73.13 | 69.21 | -3.91 |
Placebo - Month 18 | 73.58 | 70.88 | -2.69 |
Placebo - Month 30 | 73.34 | 69.51 | -4.02 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 73.02 | 71.97 | -1.07 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 42 | 74.95 | 67.48 | -7.36 |
Irbesartan - Month 54 | 75.17 | 68.24 | -6.93 |
Irbesartan - Month 66 | 71.84 | 64.85 | -5.46 |
Placebo - Month 42 | 74.37 | 71.34 | -3.14 |
Placebo - Month 54 | 75.29 | 72.65 | -2.63 |
Placebo - Month 66 | 63.47 | 60.09 | -4.91 |
Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Final Visit Mean | |
Irbesartan - Final Visit | 38.9 | 38.3 |
Placebo - Final Visit | 42.5 | 42.6 |
Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean Score | Mean Score at Timepoint | Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline | |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 42.8 | 32.1 | -10.6 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 43.0 | 33.2 | -9.8 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 42.7 | 31.6 | -11.2 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 42.7 | 32.9 | -10.0 |
Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG | Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation | |
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use | 366 | 35 |
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use | 1089 | 103 |
Placebo + ACE-I Use | 344 | 29 |
Placebo no ACE-I Use | 1102 | 99 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 255 | 549 | 512 | 508 | 83 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 121 | 247 | 519 | 460 | 476 | 103 | 28 | 13 | 68 | 153 | 213 | 382 | 328 | 460 | 114 | 64 | 35 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 276 | 536 | 501 | 510 | 83 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 116 | 232 | 531 | 430 | 509 | 90 | 39 | 10 | 74 | 146 | 212 | 339 | 335 | 461 | 145 | 75 | 32 | 384 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 193 | 523 | 504 | 579 | 97 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 122 | 195 | 513 | 439 | 525 | 115 | 48 | 11 | 68 | 153 | 157 | 361 | 319 | 479 | 166 | 80 | 34 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 200 | 519 | 471 | 596 | 101 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 116 | 182 | 489 | 443 | 559 | 109 | 43 | 16 | 74 | 146 | 178 | 300 | 337 | 477 | 176 | 90 | 42 | 383 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Event - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 235 | 552 | 529 | 537 | 63 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 122 | 234 | 532 | 461 | 503 | 78 | 30 | 8 | 68 | 153 | 207 | 378 | 332 | 480 | 121 | 52 | 25 | 396 | 76 |
Placebo | 230 | 563 | 519 | 529 | 69 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 116 | 206 | 534 | 450 | 527 | 82 | 35 | 7 | 74 | 146 | 201 | 339 | 352 | 495 | 109 | 76 | 28 | 383 | 78 |
Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 4.1 | 8.1 | 12.8 | 17.9 | 25.0 |
Placebo | 3.8 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 18.5 | 23.6 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage 1 Year | Percentage 2 Years | Percentage 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 3.3 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 13.0 | 18.0 |
Placebo | 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 13.1 | 17.1 |
Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 11.6 | 19.2 | 24.2 | 30.0 | 35.0 |
Placebo | 11.4 | 20.0 | 25.8 | 30.9 | 35.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 5.2 | 8.7 | 12.9 | 17.2 | 23.0 |
Placebo | 4.2 | 9.3 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 22.4 |
Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 7.9 | 12.9 | 15.7 | 19.8 | 23.6 |
Placebo | 8.2 | 13.7 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 23.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 9.7 | 16.3 | 20.5 | 24.8 | 28.5 |
Placebo | 9.8 | 17.1 | 21.7 | 25.9 | 29.0 |
Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 12.3 | 20.7 | 26.4 | 32.9 | 39.2 |
Placebo | 12.1 | 21.3 | 28.4 | 34.2 | 39.5 |
Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 0.7 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 5.2 |
Placebo | 1.2 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 6.2 |
This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 230 | 562 | 533 | 528 | 60 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 129 | 214 | 546 | 442 | 507 | 72 | 21 | 5 | 75 | 185 | 180 | 430 | 344 | 477 | 117 | 41 | 23 | 364 | 91 |
Placebo | 198 | 575 | 529 | 541 | 58 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 132 | 195 | 537 | 435 | 548 | 73 | 19 | 6 | 79 | 169 | 186 | 367 | 361 | 504 | 117 | 56 | 28 | 350 | 92 |
Change from baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score. KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. KCCQ clinical summary score is a composite assessment of physical limitations and total symptom scores. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 8
Intervention | KCCQ Score (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
LCZ696 | -2.99 |
Enalapril | -4.63 |
Number of patients - All-cause mortality. All-cause mortality is common in Heart Failure HF patients this measures how many patients had this event. The data is on FAS population up to March 31, 2014 (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
LCZ696 | 711 |
Enalapril | 835 |
Number of patients with first confirmed renal dysfunction (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
LCZ696 | 94 |
Enalapril | 108 |
Percentage of participants with New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation The new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) analysis was based on a subset of FAS: i.e., for patients without a history of AF at baseline (patients with a history of AF were excluded from this analysis). (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LCZ696 | 3.15 |
Enalapril | 3.15 |
Number of participants that had first occurrence of the composite endpoint, which is defined as either CV death or HF hospitalization due to HF. (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Primary Composite | CV death | 1st HF Hospitalization | |
Enalapril | 1117 | 693 | 658 |
LCZ696 | 914 | 558 | 537 |
Number of patients reported with adjudicated primary causes of death. The data is on Randomization population up to March 31, 2014 (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of patients who died | CV Death - Fatal MI | CV Death - Pump Failure | CV Death - Sudden Death | CV Death - Presumed Sudden Death | CV Death - Presumed CV Death | CV Death - Fatal Stroke | CV Death - Pulmonary Embolism | CV Death - CV procedural | Other CV Death | Non-CV death - Infection | Non-CV death - Malignancy | Non-CV death - Renal | Non-CV death - Accidental | Non-CV death - Pulmonary | Non-CV death - Suicide | Non-CV death - GI | Other Non-CV death | Unknown Death | |
Enalapril | 837 | 33 | 185 | 311 | 23 | 95 | 34 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 34 | 41 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 33 |
LCZ696 | 714 | 25 | 147 | 251 | 26 | 67 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 36 | 41 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 34 |
LVEF is a calculation of heart pump function determined from the volume after complete filling minus the volume after complete contraction divided by the volume after complete filling. A value of 55% or greater is normal. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 56.36 | 56.82 | 42.62 | 52.37 | 39.88 | 56.33 | NA | 51.70 | 54.17 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 52.68 | 57.28 | NA | 56.11 | 54.46 | 57.82 | 56.17 | 55.79 | 54.40 |
Ramipril | 52.19 | 54.20 | 64.98 | 52.76 | 52.13 | 55.02 | 51.27 | 57.18 | 50.73 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 53.37 | 52.80 | NA | 51.74 | 34.89 | 54.05 | NA | 55.59 | NA |
LVEDV/BSA: As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The relation of heart blood volume to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 78.06 | 78.60 | 93.57 | 85.44 | 90.20 | 82.74 | NA | 84.28 | 76.65 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 79.03 | 78.01 | NA | 79.75 | 63.1 | 84.95 | 75.27 | 79.72 | 75.05 |
Ramipril | 73.03 | 74.10 | 73.23 | 75.34 | 81.19 | 75.28 | 71.99 | 70.46 | 48.68 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 78.52 | 86.13 | NA | 83.95 | 108.25 | 67.96 | NA | 71.63 | NA |
LVESV/BSA: The end systolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of contraction and is an index of the pump function of the heart. This relation to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 35.26 | 35.26 | 53.87 | 42.27 | 54.04 | 37.76 | NA | 41.72 | 35.13 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 39.49 | 34.15 | NA | 36.07 | 28.74 | 37.18 | 32.99 | 35.99 | 34.22 |
Ramipril | 36.20 | 34.77 | 25.64 | 36.82 | 39.42 | 35.30 | 35.23 | 31.17 | 23.98 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 37.91 | 42.88 | NA | 42.34 | 70.48 | 30.39 | NA | 31.56 | NA |
LVED Mass/LVEDV: As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart blood volume, the mass indexed to end diastolic volume determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a three-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | g/ml (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.79 | NA | 0.80 | 0.64 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 0.87 | 0.82 | NA | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
Ramipril | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.93 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 0.86 | 0.71 | NA | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.83 | NA | 0.80 | NA |
LVED Radius/Wall thickness As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart volume chamber diameter, the end-diastolic radius indexed to end diastolic wall thickness determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a two-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | unitless (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 3.14 | 3.39 | 4.14 | 3.68 | 4.10 | 3.71 | NA | 3.58 | 4.04 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 3.45 | 3.63 | NA | 3.42 | 3.90 | 3.56 | 4.24 | 3.56 | 4.29 |
Ramipril | 3.23 | 3.32 | 3.42 | 3.43 | 3.44 | 3.60 | 2.92 | 3.46 | 3.12 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 3.57 | 4.04 | NA | 4.01 | 4.57 | 3.60 | NA | 3.61 | NA |
By identifying three points in three different planes in the heart muscle, the maximum shortening is the average of the difference between the distance between these three points at the end of filling of the heart and the end of contraction divided by the length at the end of filling times 100. The maximum shortening is a three dimensional analysis. The higher values indicate a healthy heart. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent of length at end of filling (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,17,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,10,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=11,11,10,10) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,7,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 16.68 | 17.50 | 19.08 | 17.13 | 16.28 | 17.55 | NA | 16.62 | 20.38 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 16.00 | 18.50 | NA | 18.51 | 16.36 | 17.52 | 17.89 | 17.85 | 16.59 |
Ramipril | 15.81 | 16.88 | 18.43 | 14.57 | 17.06 | 17.26 | 16.68 | 15.67 | 13.70 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 15.84 | 18.72 | NA | 17.96 | 14.22 | 17.46 | NA | 17.52 | NA |
The Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV is calculated from the slope of the volume during the early filling of the heart with respect to time. The higher values indicate a very healthy heart muscle and lower values are indicative of a very stiff muscle. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | 1/sec (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 2.01 | 2.02 | 1.13 | 1.90 | 1.48 | 1.93 | NA | 1.65 | 1.10 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 2.0 | 1.98 | NA | 1.77 | 2.28 | 2.05 | 2.50 | 1.82 | 2.15 |
Ramipril | 1.93 | 1.74 | 2.50 | 1.80 | 2.02 | 1.91 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 1.34 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 2.11 | 2.03 | NA | 1.93 | 1.56 | 1.89 | NA | 1.88 | NA |
hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the outpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Handheld Ultrasound | 4 |
Clinical Assessment Only | 5 |
hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the inpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Handheld Ultrasound | 6 |
Clinical Assessment Only | 18 |
"New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.~Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity.~Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100m). Comfortable only at rest.~Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients." (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | visits (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
NYHA Class I | NYHA Class II | NYHA Class III | NYHA Class IV | |
Clinical Assessment Only | 1 | 18 | 39 | 2 |
Handheld Ultrasound | 0 | 9 | 22 | 0 |
43 reviews available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotens | 2020 |
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Entresto a Possible Option.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; | 2017 |
[Heart failure with "mid-range" ejection fraction: a new clinical entity?]
Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Comorbidity; Coronary Disease; | 2018 |
Risk of Stroke in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; | 2015 |
The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Female | 2009 |
The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2010 |
Cardiovascular outcome of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, candesartan, in Japan.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2010 |
Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2011 |
Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: have we been pursuing the wrong paradigm?
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2011 |
What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE?
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agents; Cli | 2012 |
[Treatment for diastolic failure].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2003 |
[Angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Heart Fai | 2003 |
[Cardiologic and diabetologic aspects of therapy with angiotensin receptor blocking agents].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2003 |
Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart | 2003 |
Valsartan for the treatment of heart failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2004 |
[Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist on heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clini | 2004 |
[Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme].
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Failure | 2004 |
[New treatment of heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockaders show promising results in an extensive study].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2004 |
[CHARM study--new strategy for the treatment of heart failure].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2004 |
[Organ protection by angiotensin II receptor blockers].
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; | 2004 |
Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Dr | 2004 |
[Ace inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for therapy of chronic heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimid | 2005 |
A review of the current evidence for the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2005 |
[Angiotensin II receptor blockers--evidence along the cardiovascular continuum].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Ty | 2005 |
[ARB II in chronic heart failure. Coincidences and divergences. Class effect?].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart | 2005 |
Effects of selective angiotensin II and beta1-receptor blockade on renal haemodynamics and sodium handling during orthostatic stress in healthy individuals.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor | 2006 |
Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2006 |
[CHARM].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2006 |
Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topi | 2006 |
Improving outcomes in chronic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Agents; | 2006 |
[Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topi | 2007 |
[Pharmocological therapeutics for chronic heart failure--how to use ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2007 |
[Diabetic heart disease].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2007 |
Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2007 |
Candesartan in heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Death, Sudden; Heart Fa | 2006 |
[Clinical trials of ACE inhibitors and ARB for treatment of patients with hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy in Japan--special reference to the dosage schedule and adverse effects].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2008 |
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihype | 1999 |
[ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonists?].
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme In | 1999 |
Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2000 |
New competition in the realm of renin-angiotensin axis inhibition; the angiotensin II receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2001 |
Angiotensin receptor blockers for chronic heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Convertin | 2001 |
[Angiotensin I receptor blockers for heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2001 |
Neurohumoral blockade in CHF management.
Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazo | 2000 |
64 trials available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial.
Topics: Age Factors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heal | 2020 |
Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Double | 2020 |
Contribution of cardiac and extra-cardiac disease burden to risk of cardiovascular outcomes varies by ejection fraction in heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; C | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E | 2018 |
A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood | 2018 |
Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2018 |
Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Asian People; Benzimidazole | 2013 |
Influence of previous heart failure hospitalization on cardiovascular events in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Echocardiography | 2014 |
Prognostic importance of temporal changes in resting heart rate in heart failure patients: an analysis of the CHARM program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; | 2015 |
International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2015 |
A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Ang | 2015 |
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with angina and heart failure in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Programme.
Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; | 2015 |
Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial.
Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular | 2016 |
Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan.
Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme I | 2008 |
Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2008 |
Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme.
Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blocke | 2008 |
Impact of hospitalization for acute coronary events on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Unstable; Angiotensin II | 2009 |
Interactions of glucose metabolism and chronic heart failure.
Topics: Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Chronic Di | 2009 |
Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker.
Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2009 |
Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidaz | 2009 |
Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for heart failure patients: is combination treatment a feasible prospect?
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzy | 2009 |
Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure receiving bronchodilators in the CHARM programme.
Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Bronchodilator Agents; Comorbidity; Female; Heart Failure; | 2010 |
Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Benzimida | 2010 |
Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2012 |
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A | 2003 |
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; | 2003 |
Comparative impact of enalapril, candesartan or metoprolol alone or in combination on ventricular remodelling in patients with congestive heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2003 |
Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease.
Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronar | 2003 |
[Clinical study of the month. The CHARM study].
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2003 |
[Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist on heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clini | 2004 |
Rationale for the use of combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in heart failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2004 |
Beneficial effect of candesartan treatment on cardiac autonomic nervous activity in patients with chronic heart failure: simultaneous recording of ambulatory electrocardiogram and posture.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Autonomic Nervous System; Benzimid | 2004 |
[Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure. CHARM Study].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2004 |
Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Canada; Cardiovas | 2004 |
Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; H | 2004 |
Effects of candesartan on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with congestive heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihyperte | 2005 |
CHARMed - the effects of candesartan in heart failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2005 |
Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2005 |
Usefulness of temporal changes in neurohormones as markers of ventricular remodeling and prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure receiving either candesartan or enalapril or both.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2005 |
Effects of candesartan on cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese hypertensive patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pres | 2005 |
An angiotensin receptor blocker reduces the risk of congestive heart failure in elderly hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; C | 2005 |
Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Aorta; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2006 |
Should chronic heart failure patients with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction receive angiotensin-receptor blockers?
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; D | 2005 |
Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients.
Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Female; Heart Fai | 2005 |
Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihyperte | 2006 |
Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun | 2006 |
Resource utilization and costs in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Pacing, Artific | 2006 |
Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com | 2007 |
[Cardioprotection by means of Candesartan in cardiac insufficiency. CHARM overall partial evaluation (Candesartan in heart failure assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity)].
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agent | 2006 |
Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2007 |
Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; Female; Follow-Up | 2007 |
Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies; Double | 2007 |
Aldosterone receptor antagonism induces reverse remodeling when added to angiotensin receptor blockade in chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Meth | 2007 |
Effects of different AT1-receptor antagonists in the therapy of severe heart failure pretreated with ACE inhibitors.
Topics: Acrylates; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-C | 2007 |
Additive effects of spironolactone and candesartan on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and left ventricular remodeling in patients with congestive heart failure.
Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compo | 2007 |
Efficacy and tolerability of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with heart failure already receiving an angiotensin-converting inhibitor plus aldosterone antagonist, with or without a beta blocker. Findings from the Candesartan in Heart fa
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2008 |
Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetic Angiopat | 2008 |
Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; | 1999 |
[Comparison of candesartan, enalapril and their combination in congestive heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2000 |
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound | 2001 |
Effects of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockade on cardiac vagal control in heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Baroreflex; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2001 |
Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biph | 2002 |
91 other studies available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; | 2022 |
Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme.
Topics: Genome-Wide Association Study; Heart Failure; Humans; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Randomized Controlled | 2022 |
Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biological Vari | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Angiotensin receptor blocker use and gastro-oesophageal cancer survival: a population-based cohort study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphen | 2018 |
Seeking therapeutic precision in heart failure: is ejection fraction really the way? Deconstructing the CHARM of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.
Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles | 2018 |
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2019 |
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for patients with chronic heart failure: the next step forward.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure | 2013 |
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compo | 2013 |
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of young and very young adults with heart failure: The CHARM programme (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; E | 2013 |
Dosage of angiotensin-II receptor blockers in heart failure patients following changes in Danish drug reimbursement policies.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Denmark; Female; Heart F | 2014 |
Regional differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction trials: when nephrology meets cardiology but east does not meet west.
Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Fluorobenzenes; Geography; Heart Failure; Humans; Intern | 2015 |
Successful Treatment with an Antihypertensive Drug Regimen Including Eplerenone in a Patient with Malignant Phase Hypertension with Renal Failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cal | 2015 |
Worsening renal function and outcome in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and the impact of angiotensin receptor blocker treatment: data from the CHARM-study programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Disease Prog | 2016 |
Selective type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates oxidative stress and regulates angiotensin II receptors in the canine failing heart.
Topics: Aldehydes; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2008 |
Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) and resource utilization and costs in Italy.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; | 2008 |
Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Diastole; Female; | 2008 |
The heart failure frequent flyer: an urban legend.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2009 |
Albuminuria in chronic heart failure: prevalence and prognostic importance.
Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphen | 2009 |
Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade.
Topics: 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers | 2009 |
HEAAL: the final chapter in the story of angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure--lessons learnt from a decade of trials.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2010 |
Effects of angiotensin type I receptor blockade on the cardiac Raf/MEK/ERK cascade activated via adrenergic receptors.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2010 |
Is the effect of angiotensin receptor blockade in patients with heart failure modified by treatment with aspirin? The answer is not so clear!
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Benzimida | 2010 |
Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause | 2011 |
Waste not, want not: free money, moral hazard and value-based prescribing.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; | 2011 |
Easy money? Health cost savings resulting from the switch from a branded drug to a low-cost generic drug in the same class.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; | 2011 |
[Remarkable results with candesartan].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relations | 2011 |
Candesartan vs losartan and mortality in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Europe; Guideline Adherence; H | 2011 |
Candesartan vs losartan and mortality in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heart Failure; Humans; Losarta | 2011 |
Cardiac AA amyloidosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: the therapeutic potential of biological reagents.
Topics: Aged; Amyloidosis; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzimidazo | 2011 |
Comparative effectiveness of individual angiotensin receptor blockers on risk of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Confoun | 2012 |
The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; | 2012 |
Effects of an angiotensin 2 receptor blocker plus diuretic combination drug in chronic heart failure complicated by hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; | 2011 |
Days alive and out of hospital and the patient journey in patients with heart failure: Insights from the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2011 |
Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2012 |
Subtle issues in model specification and estimation of marginal structural models.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; | 2012 |
Does slow and steady win the race?
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; | 2012 |
[Drug therapies following heart failure and myocardial infarction(discussion)].
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimidazoles; | 2002 |
Effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on [(123)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial imaging findings and neurohumoral factors in chronic heart failure.
Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angio | 2002 |
Cardiology patient page. Angiotensin receptor blockers.
Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Bip | 2003 |
Myogenic constriction is increased in mesenteric resistance arteries from rats with chronic heart failure: instantaneous counteraction by acute AT1 receptor blockade.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2003 |
Candesartan and heart failure: the allure of CHARM.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound | 2003 |
Angiotensin subtype 1 rReceptor (AT1) blockade improves vasorelaxation in heart failure by up-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase via activation of the AT2 receptor.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Arteries; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blot | 2003 |
Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Area Unde | 2003 |
[AT1 blockers against heart failure. The charm of polypharmacy].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2003 |
ARBs reduce heart-failure deaths, hospitalizations.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Agents; Heart F | 2003 |
EUROPA shows role for ACE inhibition in low-risk CHD.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound | 2003 |
The CHARM programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2003 |
The CHARM programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2003 |
The CHARM programme.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2003 |
The CHARM programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2003 |
The CHARM programme.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2003 |
[Treatment of heart failure in the 21st century--the position of ARB in view of therapy and preventive medicine: discussion].
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Tetrazoles | 2004 |
Gene expression profile revealed different effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzazepines; B | 2003 |
Implications of recent clinical trials for heart failure performance measures.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; | 2004 |
Angiotensin receptor blockers and heart failure: still CHARMing after VALIANT?
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2004 |
[Acute coronary syndrome you can hear the prognosis].
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Arte | 2004 |
[Candesartan reduces the risk of mortality and recurrence of chronic heart failure. Important results from the CHARM study].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2004 |
Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure.
Topics: Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Disease Progression; Dogs; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Mal | 2004 |
Extracellular signal regulated kinase and SMAD signaling both mediate the angiotensin II driven progression towards overt heart failure in homozygous TGR(mRen2)27.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Atr | 2004 |
[AT 1-blocker can be given in addition to ACE inhibitor and beta blocker. "Triple therapy decidedly well tolerated even in severe heart failure"].
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2004 |
Use of angiotensin receptor antagonists in patients with ACE inhibitor induced angioedema.
Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Angioedema; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-C | 2004 |
Angiotensin-receptor blockers in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM trial.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2004 |
And an ARB makes nine: polypharmacy in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com | 2004 |
Effects of ACE inhibitor and AT1 blocker on dystrophin-related proteins and calpain in failing heart.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blotting, Wes | 2005 |
[Conclusions from CHARM interview with Prof. Veselin Mitrovich, Bad Nauheim. Strong evidence: more help for weak hearts].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2005 |
The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B | 2005 |
Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Health St | 2005 |
Beneficial effect of candesartan on rat diastolic heart failure.
Topics: Aldehydes; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com | 2005 |
Practical recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: putting guidelines into practice.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibit | 2005 |
Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Weight; C | 2005 |
Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; | 2005 |
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2006 |
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2006 |
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2006 |
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai | 2006 |
Clinical correlates and consequences of anemia in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program.
Topics: Aged; Anemia; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; | 2006 |
Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun | 2006 |
Relationship of dose of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to the benefits of candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Added trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazo | 2006 |
AT1 receptor antagonist restores cardiac ryanodine receptor function, rendering isoproterenol-induced failing heart less susceptible to Ca2+ -leak induced by oxidative stress.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium; Calci | 2006 |
Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun | 2006 |
Lack of deleterious interaction between angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers in the treatment of patients with heart failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2006 |
Characterization of health-related quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved versus low ejection fraction in CHARM.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co | 2007 |
Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Bundle-Branch Blo | 2007 |
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect?
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; | 2007 |
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker attenuates myocardial remodeling and preserves diastolic function in diabetic heart.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blo | 2007 |
Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank.
Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Databases as T | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Incidence and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure: an analysis of the CHARM Program.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2007 |
Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimi | 2008 |
Heart failure-related atrial fibrillation: a new model for a new prevention strategy?
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Comp | 2008 |
Blockade of the renin angiotensin system in heart failure: the potential place of angiotensin II receptor blockers.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2000 |
AT(1) receptor antagonists-beyond blood pressure control: possible place in heart failure treatment.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Bi | 2000 |
Sodium intake influences hemodynamic and neural responses to angiotensin receptor blockade in rostral ventrolateral medulla.
Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; | 2001 |