Page last updated: 2024-10-24

candesartan and Cardiac Failure

candesartan has been researched along with Cardiac Failure in 197 studies

candesartan: a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist
candesartan : A benzimidazolecarboxylic acid that is 1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid substituted by an ethoxy group at position 2 and a ({2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl}methyl) group at position 1. It is a angiotensin receptor antagonist used for the treatment of hypertension.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"We use the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) randomized trial."9.34Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial. ( Claggett, BL; Granger, B; Hernán, MA; Murray, EJ; Solomon, SD, 2020)
"We tested the hypothesis that candesartan improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction [HFmrEF; ejection fraction (EF) 40-49%]."9.27Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. ( Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Lam, CS; Liu, J; Lund, LH; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Rosano, GM; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2018)
"To evaluate the impact of AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) on the response to candesartan in patients with heart failure."9.27A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure. ( de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Fouodjio, R; Giannetti, N; Guertin, MC; Huynh, T; Langlois, M; Lavoie, J; LeBlanc, MH; Lepage, S; Mansour, A; Mongrain, I; Normand, V; O'Meara, E; Phillips, MS; Provost, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Sheppard, R; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2018)
"The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks."9.27Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction ( Abe, Y; Ajioka, M; Anzai, T; Aonuma, K; Asakura, M; Hamasaki, T; Hayashi, T; Hiramitsu, S; Kawai, H; Kimura, K; Kioka, H; Kitakaze, M; Lim, YJ; Matsuoka, K; Motoki, H; Nagata, Y; Nakamura, S; Ohte, N; Ozaki, Y; Sasaoka, T; Takahama, H; Tamaki, S, 2018)
"Patients enrolled in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) Program were divided into groups by tertiles of baseline heart rate."9.16Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program. ( Castagno, D; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Takeuchi, M; Yusuf, S, 2012)
"The long-term effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or their combination have been incompletely studied in a large cohort of patients with heart failure not treated with beta-blockers."9.14Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker. ( Afzal, R; Floras, J; McKelvie, RS; Rouleau, JL; White, M; Yusuf, S, 2009)
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)."9.14Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009)
"It is unknown whether there is an interaction between aspirin and angiotensin receptor blockers on outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF)."9.14Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Chang, SM; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; Kosolcharoen, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Murray, DR; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2010)
"To explore the impact of selected candidate genes on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and antiinflammatory effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure who are already being treated with an ACE inhibitor."9.13Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan. ( Bélanger, F; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Touyz, RM; Turgeon, J; White, M; Whittom, L; Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M, 2008)
"We investigated the change in weight over 6 months in 6933 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme, and its association with subsequent mortality (1435 deaths) over a median 32."9.13Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Anker, SD; Dobson, J; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, KB; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"We analysed outcomes in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme which randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF and a broad range of EF."9.13Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, CB; MacDonald, MR; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Varyani, F; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"Candesartan has a favorable effect on large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure."9.12Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program. ( Arnold, JM; Desai, SS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Marchiori, G; Mitchell, GF; O'Brien, TX; Pfeffer, MA; Warner, E, 2006)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme was designed as three parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in three different but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure."9.12Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Ostergren, JB, 2006)
"We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs)."9.12Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Ducharme, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olsson, LG; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2006)
"We assessed the effects of candesartan in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on N-terminal pro-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress as well as on glucose regulation in patients with heart failure (HF)."9.12Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure. ( Dabouz, F; De Denus, S; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Touyz, R; White, M; Whittom, L, 2007)
"We compared outcomes in 2400 women and 5199 men randomized in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program using multivariable regression analyses."9.12Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Clayton, T; Granger, CB; McEntegart, MB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Piña, IL; Pocock, S; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"We examined the influence of BMI on prognosis using Cox proportional hazards models in 7599 patients (mean age, 65 years; 35% women) with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II to IV) and a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions (mean, 39%) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program."9.12Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, PV; Granger, CB; Kenchaiah, S; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, LA, 2007)
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction."9.11Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004)
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)."9.11Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, C; McMurray, J; Michelson, E; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, M; Solomon, S; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2004)
"We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial."9.11Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; McMurray, JV; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, J; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and significantly reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions for heart failure."9.10Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and reduced cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors."9.10Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"Candesartan has a moderate impact in preventing admissions for CHF among patients who have heart failure and LVEF higher than 40%."9.10Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"Twenty-eight heart failure patients, who were on stable ACE inhibitor therapy, were randomised to receive adjunctive therapy with candesartan or placebo."9.10Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress. ( Anderson, RA; Blackman, DJ; Ellis, GR; Frenneaux, MP; Jackson, SK; Lang, D; Lewis, MJ; Morris-Thurgood, J; Mumford, C; Nightingale, AK; Penney, MD; Timmins, G, 2002)
"We investigated the effects of candesartan (an angiotensin II antagonist) alone, enalapril alone, and their combination on exercise tolerance, ventricular function, quality of life (QOL), neurohormone levels, and tolerability in congestive heart failure (CHF)."9.09Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. ( Avezum, A; Burns, RJ; Latini, R; Maggioni, A; McKelvie, RS; Pericak, D; Pogue, J; Probstfield, J; Rouleau, J; Tsuyuki, RT; White, M; Young, J; Yusuf, S, 1999)
"The UK National Health Service (NHS) currently spends in excess of £250 million per annum on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure; with candesartan currently dominating the market."8.87Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis. ( Bodalia, PN; Grosso, AM; Hingorani, AD; Macallister, RJ; Moon, JC; Scott, MA, 2011)
"Recent studies have shown candesartan to be an effective therapy for heart failure (HF) patients, producing a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity."8.85The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure. ( McKelvie, RS, 2009)
" Candesartan, a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist, has been shown to be an effective, and well-tolerated therapy, in both the early and late phases of cardiovascular disease (prehypertension, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure)."8.84Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach. ( Barrios, V; Calderon, A; Escobar, C, 2007)
"The CHARM programme, which recruited 7,601 patients, compared the angiotensin-receptor blocker, candesartan, with a placebo in three different populations with class II-VI heart failure."8.82[Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme]. ( Matsuzaki, M; Umemoto, S, 2004)
"Sacubitril/valsartan was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%."8.12Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective. ( Clark, J; Gandotra, C; Liu, Q; Rose, M; Senatore, FF; Stockbridge, NL; Zhang, J, 2022)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor."8.12Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme. ( Asselin, G; Barhdadi, A; Carss, K; Chazara, O; Cunningham, JW; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Granger, CB; Haefliger, C; Lemaçon, A; Lemieux Perreault, LP; McMurray, JJV; Mongrain, I; Paul, DS; Provost, S; Rouleau, J; Solomon, SD; Tardif, JC; Wang, Q; Yusuf, S, 2022)
"To assess the hypothesis that losartan use is associated with increased all-cause mortality in heart failure patients as compared with candesartan."7.78Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure. ( Hviid, A; Pasternak, B; Svanström, H, 2012)
"In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP."7.74Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program. ( Anand, I; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Meredith, PA; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"Rabbits subjected to ventricular tachypacing at 380 to 400 bpm for 4 weeks in the absence and presence of treatment with pioglitazone, candesartan, and combined pioglitazone and candesartan were assessed by electrophysiologic study, atrial fibrosis measurements, and cytokine expression analyses."7.74Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure. ( Harata, S; Inden, Y; Kitamura, K; Murohara, T; Nattel, S; Shimano, M; Tsuji, Y; Uchikawa, T, 2008)
"The CHARM program was designed as 3 separate randomized trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who (1) were intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =0."7.73The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Hennekens, CH; Pocock, S; Wang, D; Wilhelmsen, L, 2005)
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on patients' perception of symptoms, using the McMaster Overall treatment evaluation (OTE), in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)."7.73Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, C; Lewis, E; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, J; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"This study was designed to examine the hypothesis that a calcium channel blocker nifedipine (CCB) could enhance the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-ll receptor blocker candesartan (ARB) in the treatment for heart failure."7.73Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure. ( Hayashi, T; Horimoto, H; Inamoto, S; Kitaura, Y; Mieno, S; Mori, T; Okabe, M; Okuda, N, 2005)
"To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure."7.73Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. ( Demers, C; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"The goal of this study was to determine whether an Angiotensin II receptor antagonist, candesartan, prevents myocardial fibrosis more effectively than enalapril in animals with a non-ACE pathway during the progression of congestive heart failure (CHF)."7.72Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure. ( Dohi, K; Funabiki, K; Imanaka-Yoshida, K; Ito, M; Kitamura, T; Koji, T; Nakano, T; Nobori, T; Onishi, K, 2004)
"Candesartan has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events when therapy was started 6 months after PCI with bare-metal stents in patients who survived restenosis."6.82Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial. ( Hokimoto, S; Kikuta, K; Kimura, K; Koide, S; Matsui, K; Matsumura, T; Nakao, K; Ogawa, H; Oka, H; Oshima, S; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, H; Tsujita, K; Yamamoto, N, 2016)
"HD candesartan was more effective in improving plasma BNP levels and cardiac function than LD in Japanese CHF patients."6.78Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. ( Matsuzaki, M; Miyata, Y; Nakamura, K; Nakata, E; Sugiura, K; Tsutsui, H; Yamamoto, K; Yano, M, 2013)
" Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more frequent in the candesartan group: placebo/candesartan risk (%), lowest compared with highest age category: hyperkalemia (0."6.73Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme. ( Cohen-Solal, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome."6.43Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006)
"Candesartan is a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist that is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with insurmountable receptor binding abilities."6.43Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006)
"Candesartan cilexetil is a nonpeptide selective blocker of the angiotensin II receptor sub-type 1."6.43Candesartan in heart failure. ( Chonlahan, JS; Germany, RE; Ripley, TL, 2006)
"Candesartan is a selective angiotensin II Type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker which binds tightly to, and dissociates slowly from the receptor."6.42Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. ( Ostergren, J, 2004)
" Considering these factors, a more individualized approach of candesartan dosing should be investigated in patients with HF."5.62Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. ( Bonnefois, G; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Kassem, I; Li, J; Nekka, F; Rouleau, JL; Sanche, S; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2021)
"Candesartan treatment significantly reversed the increases in both AQP2 and p-AQP2 expression and targeting."5.35Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade. ( Frøkiaer, J; Jonassen, T; Kim, SW; Knepper, MA; Kwon, TH; Lütken, SC; Marples, D; Nielsen, S, 2009)
"We use the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) randomized trial."5.34Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial. ( Claggett, BL; Granger, B; Hernán, MA; Murray, EJ; Solomon, SD, 2020)
"The authors pooled data from 3 trials-CHARM Preserved (Candesartan Cilexietil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity), I-Preserve (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function), and the Americas region of TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) (N = 8,916)-and examined whether MI before or following enrollment independently predicted CV death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization."5.34Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials. ( Anand, IS; Carson, P; Claggett, BL; Cunningham, JW; Desai, AS; Jhund, PS; John, JE; Kober, L; Lewis, EF; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Pitt, B; Shah, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vaduganathan, M; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2020)
"We tested the hypothesis that candesartan improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction [HFmrEF; ejection fraction (EF) 40-49%]."5.27Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. ( Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Lam, CS; Liu, J; Lund, LH; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Rosano, GM; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2018)
"To evaluate the impact of AGTR1 A1166C (rs5186) on the response to candesartan in patients with heart failure."5.27A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure. ( de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Fouodjio, R; Giannetti, N; Guertin, MC; Huynh, T; Langlois, M; Lavoie, J; LeBlanc, MH; Lepage, S; Mansour, A; Mongrain, I; Normand, V; O'Meara, E; Phillips, MS; Provost, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Sheppard, R; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2018)
"The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks."5.27Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction ( Abe, Y; Ajioka, M; Anzai, T; Aonuma, K; Asakura, M; Hamasaki, T; Hayashi, T; Hiramitsu, S; Kawai, H; Kimura, K; Kioka, H; Kitakaze, M; Lim, YJ; Matsuoka, K; Motoki, H; Nagata, Y; Nakamura, S; Ohte, N; Ozaki, Y; Sasaoka, T; Takahama, H; Tamaki, S, 2018)
"We studied 7599 patients enrolled in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity program."5.20Prognostic importance of temporal changes in resting heart rate in heart failure patients: an analysis of the CHARM program. ( Castagno, D; Claggett, B; Granger, CB; Jhund, P; McMurray, JJ; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vazir, A; Yusuf, S, 2015)
"We analyzed outcomes by international geographic region in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve), the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Preserved trial, the CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Added HF-REF trials, and the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in HF-REF (CORONA)."5.20International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. ( Carson, PE; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Kjekshus, J; Komajda, M; Kristensen, SL; Køber, L; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wedel, H; Wikstrand, J; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2015)
"We used the treatment-arm of the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD-T) as the reference trial for comparison of an ACE inhibitor to placebo and the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity-Alternative trial (CHARM-Alternative) as the reference trial for comparison of an ARB to placebo."5.20A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure. ( Andersen, K; Arango, JL; Arnold, M; Bayram, E; Bĕlohlávek, J; Böhm, M; Boytsov, S; Burgess, L; Cabrera, W; Chen, CH; Desai, A; Erglis, A; Fu, M; Gomez, E; Gong, J; Gonzalez, A; Greenlaw, N; Hagege, AA; Katova, T; Kiatchoosakun, S; Kim, KS; Lefkowitz, M; Martinez, F; McMurray, J; Mendoza, I; Merkely, B; Mosterd, A; Negrusz-Kawecka, M; Packer, M; Peuhkurinen, K; Ramires, F; Refsgaard, J; Rizkala, A; Rouleau, J; Senni, M; Shi, V; Sibulo, AS; Silva-Cardoso, J; Solomon, S; Squire, I; Starling, RC; Swedberg, K; Teerlink, JR; Vinereanu, D; Wong, R; Zile, MR, 2015)
"Patients enrolled in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) Program were divided into groups by tertiles of baseline heart rate."5.16Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program. ( Castagno, D; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Takeuchi, M; Yusuf, S, 2012)
"The long-term effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or their combination have been incompletely studied in a large cohort of patients with heart failure not treated with beta-blockers."5.14Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker. ( Afzal, R; Floras, J; McKelvie, RS; Rouleau, JL; White, M; Yusuf, S, 2009)
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)."5.14Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009)
"The addition of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan to a angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure."5.14Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for heart failure patients: is combination treatment a feasible prospect? ( Dubrey, SW; Grocott-Mason, R; McDonagh, S; Mehta, PA; Phillips, J, 2009)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF to receive candesartan or placebo."5.14Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure receiving bronchodilators in the CHARM programme. ( Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; Maggioni, AP; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2010)
"It is unknown whether there is an interaction between aspirin and angiotensin receptor blockers on outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF)."5.14Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Chang, SM; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; Kosolcharoen, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Murray, DR; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2010)
"To explore the impact of selected candidate genes on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and antiinflammatory effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure who are already being treated with an ACE inhibitor."5.13Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan. ( Bélanger, F; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Touyz, RM; Turgeon, J; White, M; Whittom, L; Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M, 2008)
"We investigated the change in weight over 6 months in 6933 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme, and its association with subsequent mortality (1435 deaths) over a median 32."5.13Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Anker, SD; Dobson, J; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, KB; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"We analysed outcomes in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme which randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF and a broad range of EF."5.13Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, CB; MacDonald, MR; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Varyani, F; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"Candesartan has a favorable effect on large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure."5.12Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program. ( Arnold, JM; Desai, SS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Marchiori, G; Mitchell, GF; O'Brien, TX; Pfeffer, MA; Warner, E, 2006)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme was designed as three parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in three different but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure."5.12Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Ostergren, JB, 2006)
"We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs)."5.12Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Ducharme, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olsson, LG; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2006)
"We assessed the effects of candesartan in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on N-terminal pro-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP), systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress as well as on glucose regulation in patients with heart failure (HF)."5.12Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure. ( Dabouz, F; De Denus, S; Ducharme, A; Gossard, D; Lavoie, J; Leblanc, MH; Lepage, S; Racine, N; Rouleau, JL; Touyz, R; White, M; Whittom, L, 2007)
"We compared outcomes in 2400 women and 5199 men randomized in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program using multivariable regression analyses."5.12Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Clayton, T; Granger, CB; McEntegart, MB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Piña, IL; Pocock, S; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"We examined the influence of BMI on prognosis using Cox proportional hazards models in 7599 patients (mean age, 65 years; 35% women) with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II to IV) and a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions (mean, 39%) in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program."5.12Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, PV; Granger, CB; Kenchaiah, S; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, LA, 2007)
"The objective of this study was to determine if adding spironolactone to an angiotensin II receptor blocker improves left ventricular (LV) function, mass, and volumes in chronic heart failure."5.12Aldosterone receptor antagonism induces reverse remodeling when added to angiotensin receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. ( Chan, AK; Chan, WW; Lam, W; Lam, YY; Sanderson, JE; So, N; Wang, M; Wang, T; Wong, JT; Wu, EB; Yeung, L; Yip, G; Yu, CM; Zhang, Y, 2007)
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction."5.11Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004)
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)."5.11Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Granger, C; McMurray, J; Michelson, E; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, M; Solomon, S; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2004)
"We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial."5.11Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; McMurray, JV; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, J; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"We studied 7599 patients with a broad spectrum of symptomatic heart failure enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program."5.11Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. ( Anavekar, N; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and significantly reduced cardiovascular deaths and hospital admissions for heart failure."5.10Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"Candesartan was generally well tolerated and reduced cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors."5.10Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"Candesartan has a moderate impact in preventing admissions for CHF among patients who have heart failure and LVEF higher than 40%."5.10Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. ( Granger, CB; Held, P; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2003)
"In parallel, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, candesartan (titrated to 32 mg once daily) was compared to placebo in 3 distinct populations: 1) patients with symptomatic heart failure (SHF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40% or less who were not receiving an ACE inhibitor because of previous intolerance (CHARM-Alternative); 2) patients with SHF and LVEF 40% or less who were currently receiving an ACE inhibitor (CHARM-Added); 3) patients with SHF and LVEF higher than 40% (CHARM-Preserved)."5.10[Clinical study of the month. The CHARM study]. ( Kulbertus, H, 2003)
"Twenty-eight heart failure patients, who were on stable ACE inhibitor therapy, were randomised to receive adjunctive therapy with candesartan or placebo."5.10Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress. ( Anderson, RA; Blackman, DJ; Ellis, GR; Frenneaux, MP; Jackson, SK; Lang, D; Lewis, MJ; Morris-Thurgood, J; Mumford, C; Nightingale, AK; Penney, MD; Timmins, G, 2002)
"We investigated the effects of candesartan (an angiotensin II antagonist) alone, enalapril alone, and their combination on exercise tolerance, ventricular function, quality of life (QOL), neurohormone levels, and tolerability in congestive heart failure (CHF)."5.09Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. ( Avezum, A; Burns, RJ; Latini, R; Maggioni, A; McKelvie, RS; Pericak, D; Pogue, J; Probstfield, J; Rouleau, J; Tsuyuki, RT; White, M; Young, J; Yusuf, S, 1999)
"Examination of patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in the DIG (Digitalis Investigation Group) trials and the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) trials provides comparisons of outcomes in each of these types of heart failure."4.88What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE? ( Campbell, RT; Castagno, D; Hawkins, NM; Jhund, PS; McMurray, JJ; Petrie, MC, 2012)
"The UK National Health Service (NHS) currently spends in excess of £250 million per annum on angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure; with candesartan currently dominating the market."4.87Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis. ( Bodalia, PN; Grosso, AM; Hingorani, AD; Macallister, RJ; Moon, JC; Scott, MA, 2011)
"Here, we systematically review and evaluate prospective clinical studies of RAS inhibitors enrolling patients with HF-PEF, including the 3 major trials of RAS inhibition (Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [CHARM-Preserved], Irbesartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction [I-PRESERVE], and Perindopril in Elderly People with Chronic Heart Failure [PEP-CHF])."4.86The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Desai, AS; Givertz, MM; Shah, RV, 2010)
"Recent studies have shown candesartan to be an effective therapy for heart failure (HF) patients, producing a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity."4.85The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure. ( McKelvie, RS, 2009)
" Candesartan, a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist, has been shown to be an effective, and well-tolerated therapy, in both the early and late phases of cardiovascular disease (prehypertension, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure)."4.84Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach. ( Barrios, V; Calderon, A; Escobar, C, 2007)
"The CHARM programme, which recruited 7,601 patients, compared the angiotensin-receptor blocker, candesartan, with a placebo in three different populations with class II-VI heart failure."4.82[Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme]. ( Matsuzaki, M; Umemoto, S, 2004)
"CHARM (candesartan in heart failure assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity) is the largest trial program in chronic heart failure."4.82[CHARM study--new strategy for the treatment of heart failure]. ( Hasegawa, H; Komuro, I, 2004)
"The introduction of Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in 1995 was another milestone in the pharmacological management of hypertension."4.82[Angiotensin II receptor blockers--evidence along the cardiovascular continuum]. ( Battegay, E; Zeller, A, 2005)
"Sacubitril/valsartan was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%."4.12Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective. ( Clark, J; Gandotra, C; Liu, Q; Rose, M; Senatore, FF; Stockbridge, NL; Zhang, J, 2022)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor."4.12Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme. ( Asselin, G; Barhdadi, A; Carss, K; Chazara, O; Cunningham, JW; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Granger, CB; Haefliger, C; Lemaçon, A; Lemieux Perreault, LP; McMurray, JJV; Mongrain, I; Paul, DS; Provost, S; Rouleau, J; Solomon, SD; Tardif, JC; Wang, Q; Yusuf, S, 2022)
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i."3.91Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019)
"Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; including candesartan, losartan, olmesartan and valsartan) are widely used to treat hypertension, heart failure and diabetic neuropathy."3.88Angiotensin receptor blocker use and gastro-oesophageal cancer survival: a population-based cohort study. ( Busby, J; Cardwell, CR; Hughes, C; Johnston, BT; McMenamin, Ú; Spence, A, 2018)
"National reimbursement policies in Denmark were changed in November 2010 favouring a shift in angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment to generic losartan for heart failure (HF) patients."3.80Dosage of angiotensin-II receptor blockers in heart failure patients following changes in Danish drug reimbursement policies. ( Gislason, GH; Kristensen, SL; Køber, L; Lamberts, M; Selmer, C; Torp-Pedersen, C; von Kappelgaard, LM, 2014)
"Compared with other angiotensin-receptor blockers, telmisartan and valsartan were both associated with a lower risk of admission to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure among older adults with diabetes and hypertension."3.79Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. ( Antoniou, T; Camacho, X; Gomes, T; Juurlink, DN; Mamdani, MM; Yao, Z, 2013)
"To assess the hypothesis that losartan use is associated with increased all-cause mortality in heart failure patients as compared with candesartan."3.78Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure. ( Hviid, A; Pasternak, B; Svanström, H, 2012)
" Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure."3.77[Remarkable results with candesartan]. ( Groenwold, RH; Rutten, FH, 2011)
"UACR was measured at baseline and during follow-up of 2310 patients in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Programme."3.75Albuminuria in chronic heart failure: prevalence and prognostic importance. ( Gerstein, HC; Granger, CB; Jackson, CE; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S; Zetterstrand, S, 2009)
"Animals were randomized to rapid right ventricular-pacing (250 beats/min for 3 weeks) to severe heart failure and treated with candesartan (10 mg/kg daily, n = 8) or placebo (n = 8) from day 3 onwards, or no pacing (sham, n = 7)."3.74Selective type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates oxidative stress and regulates angiotensin II receptors in the canine failing heart. ( Jugdutt, BI; Konig, A; Liu, P; Moe, G, 2008)
"In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP."3.74Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program. ( Anand, I; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Meredith, PA; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"Patients with symptomatic HF (NYHA Class II-IV) enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) HRQL study completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire at randomization."3.74Characterization of health-related quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved versus low ejection fraction in CHARM. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Halling, K; Lamas, GA; Lewis, EF; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"The Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme randomised 7599 patients with symptomatic HF to receive candesartan or placebo."3.74Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme. ( Dunn, FG; Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"Elderly patients with heart failure who were prescribed losartan had worse survival rates compared with those prescribed other commonly used ARBs."3.74Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect? ( Behlouli, H; Hudson, M; Humphries, K; Pilote, L; Sheppard, R; Tu, JV, 2007)
"All 2,679 symptomatic chronic heart failure patients from the North American CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) program had a wide range of laboratory measures performed at a core facility, enabling us to assess the relationship between routine blood tests and outcomes using a Cox proportional hazards model."3.74Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank. ( Allen, LA; Felker, GM; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Shaw, LK; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"Participants in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) (n = 7,599) Program were randomized to standard heart failure therapy plus candesartan or placebo, titrated as tolerated to a target of 32 mg once daily with recommended monitoring of serum potassium and creatinine."3.74Incidence and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure: an analysis of the CHARM Program. ( Desai, AS; Dunlap, ME; Granger, CB; Hainer, JW; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"Rabbits subjected to ventricular tachypacing at 380 to 400 bpm for 4 weeks in the absence and presence of treatment with pioglitazone, candesartan, and combined pioglitazone and candesartan were assessed by electrophysiologic study, atrial fibrosis measurements, and cytokine expression analyses."3.74Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure. ( Harata, S; Inden, Y; Kitamura, K; Murohara, T; Nattel, S; Shimano, M; Tsuji, Y; Uchikawa, T, 2008)
" We found in a previous study that some types of DRP were degraded and that calpain content was increased in rats with non-genetically induced heart failure."3.73Effects of ACE inhibitor and AT1 blocker on dystrophin-related proteins and calpain in failing heart. ( Daicho, T; Koshimizu, M; Oikawa, R; Takahashi, M; Takeo, S; Tanonaka, K; Toyo-Oka, T; Yoshida, H, 2005)
"The CHARM program was designed as 3 separate randomized trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who (1) were intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =0."3.73The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Hennekens, CH; Pocock, S; Wang, D; Wilhelmsen, L, 2005)
"To evaluate the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on patients' perception of symptoms, using the McMaster Overall treatment evaluation (OTE), in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)."3.73Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( Carlsson, J; Dunlap, ME; Granger, C; Lewis, E; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, J; Michelson, EL; O'Meara, E; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Probstfield, JL; Swedberg, K; Young, JB; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"This study was designed to examine the hypothesis that a calcium channel blocker nifedipine (CCB) could enhance the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-ll receptor blocker candesartan (ARB) in the treatment for heart failure."3.73Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure. ( Hayashi, T; Horimoto, H; Inamoto, S; Kitaura, Y; Mieno, S; Mori, T; Okabe, M; Okuda, N, 2005)
"To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure."3.73Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. ( Demers, C; Granger, CB; Johansson, PA; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Olofsson, B; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2005)
"The Candesartan in Heart Failure:Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program consisted of three component trials that enrolled patients with symptomatic CHF, based on use of ACE inhibitors and reduced (< or =40%) or preserved LVEF (>40%)."3.73Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure. ( Cornel, JH; de Zeeuw, D; Granger, CB; Hillege, HL; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Nitsch, D; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Swedberg, K; van Veldhuisen, DJ; Yusuf, S, 2006)
"To determine whether angiotensin receptor blockade decreases vascular tone in heart failure by improving endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation and increasing nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, we treated infarcted adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with candesartan for 7 days or 8 weeks (10 mg/kg/day in drinking water)."3.72Angiotensin subtype 1 rReceptor (AT1) blockade improves vasorelaxation in heart failure by up-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase via activation of the AT2 receptor. ( Gaballa, M; Goldman, S; Thai, H; Wollmuth, J, 2003)
"An 89-year-old man with severe hypertension (190/82 mm Hg) and chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II) despite treatment with benidipine, doxazosin mesylate (INN, doxazosin), and furosemide was given oral candesartan cilexetil (4 mg/d), an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker metabolized via cytochrome p450 (CYP) 2C9."3.72Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype. ( Hashimoto, H; Hayashi, H; Nishio, S; Ohashi, K; Uchida, S; Watanabe, H; Yamazaki, K, 2003)
"The goal of this study was to determine whether an Angiotensin II receptor antagonist, candesartan, prevents myocardial fibrosis more effectively than enalapril in animals with a non-ACE pathway during the progression of congestive heart failure (CHF)."3.72Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure. ( Dohi, K; Funabiki, K; Imanaka-Yoshida, K; Ito, M; Kitamura, T; Koji, T; Nakano, T; Nobori, T; Onishi, K, 2004)
"The large Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) trial recently found that in patients with heart failure who were similar to those whom clinicians see in everyday practice, the angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan was not only an acceptable alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, but also was beneficial when added to regimens that already included ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers."3.72Angiotensin-receptor blockers in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM trial. ( Bhakta, S; Dunlap, ME, 2004)
"Candesartan has been reported to reduce cardiovascular events when therapy was started 6 months after PCI with bare-metal stents in patients who survived restenosis."2.82Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial. ( Hokimoto, S; Kikuta, K; Kimura, K; Koide, S; Matsui, K; Matsumura, T; Nakao, K; Ogawa, H; Oka, H; Oshima, S; Sakamoto, T; Shimomura, H; Tsujita, K; Yamamoto, N, 2016)
"HD candesartan was more effective in improving plasma BNP levels and cardiac function than LD in Japanese CHF patients."2.78Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. ( Matsuzaki, M; Miyata, Y; Nakamura, K; Nakata, E; Sugiura, K; Tsutsui, H; Yamamoto, K; Yano, M, 2013)
" Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were more frequent in the candesartan group: placebo/candesartan risk (%), lowest compared with highest age category: hyperkalemia (0."2.73Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme. ( Cohen-Solal, A; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Puu, M; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Yusuf, S, 2008)
"Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG LVH) is a powerful independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension."2.73Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme. ( Dunn, FG; Granger, CB; Hawkins, NM; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Ostergren, J; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, SJ; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S, 2007)
"Candesartan treatment reduced primary end point risk (5."2.71Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. ( Kondo, J; Kono, T; Kosaka, T; Matsui, H; Morishima, I; Mukawa, H; Murohara, T; Numaguchi, Y; Okumura, K; Sone, T; Tsuboi, H; Uesugi, M; Yoshida, T, 2003)
"The therapies developed to treat heart failure over the years have resulted in a significant improvement in clinical outcome."2.43Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006)
"Candesartan is a long-acting angiotensin receptor antagonist that is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with insurmountable receptor binding abilities."2.43Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative. ( McKelvie, RS, 2006)
"Candesartan cilexetil is a nonpeptide selective blocker of the angiotensin II receptor sub-type 1."2.43Candesartan in heart failure. ( Chonlahan, JS; Germany, RE; Ripley, TL, 2006)
"Candesartan is a selective angiotensin II Type I (AT(1)) receptor blocker which binds tightly to, and dissociates slowly from the receptor."2.42Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. ( Ostergren, J, 2004)
" Data are reviewed to demonstrate that ACE escape reflects inadequate ACE dosage rather than a decrease in ACE inhibition occurring with time."2.41Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure. ( Berlowitz, M; Ennezat, PV; Le Jemtel, TH; Sonnenblick, EH, 2000)
"Their use in congestive heart failure and renal disease is under investigation."2.40Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy. ( Kirk, JK, 1999)
" Considering these factors, a more individualized approach of candesartan dosing should be investigated in patients with HF."1.62Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. ( Bonnefois, G; de Denus, S; Dubé, MP; Kassem, I; Li, J; Nekka, F; Rouleau, JL; Sanche, S; Tardif, JC; Turgeon, J; White, M, 2021)
"Chronic isoproterenol (ISO)-induced cardiac hypertrophy was inhibited in wild-type mice and AT1aR(-/-) mice treated with the ARB Candesartan (CV11974)."1.36Effects of angiotensin type I receptor blockade on the cardiac Raf/MEK/ERK cascade activated via adrenergic receptors. ( Kimura, S; Matsuyoshi, H; Murao, K; Obata, K; Takaki, M; Yu, X; Zhang, GX, 2010)
"Candesartan treatment significantly reversed the increases in both AQP2 and p-AQP2 expression and targeting."1.35Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade. ( Frøkiaer, J; Jonassen, T; Kim, SW; Knepper, MA; Kwon, TH; Lütken, SC; Marples, D; Nielsen, S, 2009)

Research

Studies (197)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's3 (1.52)18.2507
2000's138 (70.05)29.6817
2010's49 (24.87)24.3611
2020's7 (3.55)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Gandotra, C1
Clark, J1
Liu, Q1
Senatore, FF1
Rose, M1
Zhang, J1
Stockbridge, NL1
Dubé, MP4
Chazara, O1
Lemaçon, A1
Asselin, G1
Provost, S2
Barhdadi, A1
Lemieux Perreault, LP1
Mongrain, I2
Wang, Q1
Carss, K1
Paul, DS1
Cunningham, JW2
Rouleau, J3
Solomon, SD30
McMurray, JJV6
Yusuf, S51
Granger, CB46
Haefliger, C1
de Denus, S5
Tardif, JC3
Murray, EJ1
Claggett, BL2
Granger, B1
Hernán, MA1
Kuno, T1
Ueyama, H1
Fujisaki, T1
Briasouli, A1
Takagi, H1
Briasoulis, A1
Vaduganathan, M1
John, JE1
Desai, AS6
Lewis, EF2
Zile, MR5
Carson, P1
Jhund, PS9
Kober, L1
Pitt, B3
Shah, SJ1
Swedberg, K51
Anand, IS3
Pfeffer, MA46
Kassem, I1
Sanche, S1
Li, J1
Bonnefois, G1
Rouleau, JL9
White, M8
Turgeon, J3
Nekka, F1
Shen, L2
Carson, PE3
Køber, L4
Komajda, M4
McKelvie, RS15
Bramblett, T1
Teleb, M1
Albaghdadi, A1
Agrawal, H1
Mukherjee, D1
Busby, J1
McMenamin, Ú1
Spence, A1
Johnston, BT1
Hughes, C1
Cardwell, CR1
Wolsk, E1
Claggett, B4
Pocock, S10
Lund, LH2
Liu, J2
Lam, CS1
Rosano, GM1
Fouodjio, R1
Huynh, T1
LeBlanc, MH3
Lepage, S3
Sheppard, R2
Giannetti, N1
Lavoie, J3
Mansour, A1
Normand, V1
Langlois, M1
O'Meara, E6
Ducharme, A6
Racine, N3
Guertin, MC1
Phillips, MS1
Konstam, MA1
Takahama, H1
Asakura, M1
Abe, Y1
Ajioka, M1
Aonuma, K1
Anzai, T2
Hayashi, T2
Hiramitsu, S2
Kawai, H1
Kioka, H1
Kimura, K2
Lim, YJ1
Matsuoka, K1
Motoki, H1
Nagata, Y1
Nakamura, S1
Ohte, N1
Ozaki, Y1
Sasaoka, T1
Tamaki, S1
Hamasaki, T1
Kitakaze, M3
Rickenbacher, P1
Docherty, KF1
Petrie, MC6
Matsuzaki, M4
Yamamoto, K1
Yano, M2
Nakamura, K1
Miyata, Y1
Sugiura, K1
Nakata, E1
Tsutsui, H3
Sato, Y2
Antoniou, T1
Camacho, X1
Yao, Z1
Gomes, T1
Juurlink, DN1
Mamdani, MM1
Wong, CM2
Hawkins, NM6
MacDonald, MR2
McMurray, JJ45
Bello, NA1
Selmer, C1
Lamberts, M1
Kristensen, SL2
von Kappelgaard, LM1
Gislason, GH1
Torp-Pedersen, C1
Vazir, A1
Jhund, P1
Castagno, D3
Skali, H6
Kjekshus, J2
Wikstrand, J2
Wedel, H1
Rossignol, P1
Zannad, F1
McMurray, J5
Packer, M1
Desai, A1
Gong, J1
Greenlaw, N1
Lefkowitz, M1
Rizkala, A1
Shi, V1
Solomon, S2
Andersen, K1
Arango, JL1
Arnold, M1
Bĕlohlávek, J1
Böhm, M1
Boytsov, S1
Burgess, L1
Cabrera, W1
Chen, CH1
Erglis, A1
Fu, M1
Gomez, E1
Gonzalez, A1
Hagege, AA1
Katova, T1
Kiatchoosakun, S1
Kim, KS1
Bayram, E1
Martinez, F1
Merkely, B1
Mendoza, I1
Mosterd, A1
Negrusz-Kawecka, M1
Peuhkurinen, K1
Ramires, F1
Refsgaard, J1
Senni, M1
Sibulo, AS1
Silva-Cardoso, J1
Squire, I1
Starling, RC1
Vinereanu, D1
Teerlink, JR1
Wong, R1
Badar, AA1
Perez-Moreno, AC1
Brunton, AP1
Gardner, RS1
Abdul-Rahim, AH1
Perez, AC1
Fulton, RL1
Latini, R4
Tognoni, G1
Lip, GY1
Maggioni, AP8
Tavazzi, L1
Lees, KR1
Sakamoto, T1
Ogawa, H2
Nakao, K1
Hokimoto, S1
Tsujita, K1
Koide, S1
Yamamoto, N1
Shimomura, H1
Matsumura, T1
Oshima, S1
Kikuta, K1
Oka, H1
Matsui, K1
Takahashi, F1
Goto, M1
Wada, Y2
Hasebe, N1
Damman, K1
Young, JB12
Moe, G1
Konig, A1
Liu, P1
Jugdutt, BI1
Zakrzewski-Jakubiak, M1
Bélanger, F1
Gossard, D2
Whittom, L2
Touyz, RM1
Colombo, GL1
Caruggi, M1
Ottolini, C1
Pocock, SJ8
Dobson, J3
Michelson, EL33
Ostergren, J19
Anker, SD1
Swedberg, KB1
Cohen-Solal, A4
Puu, M5
Abrahamsson, P1
Pfeffer, M2
Meredith, PA1
Anand, I1
Olofsson, B17
Clodi, M1
Resl, M1
Stelzeneder, D1
Pacini, G1
Tura, A1
Mörtl, D1
Struck, J1
Morgenthaler, NG1
Bergmann, A1
Riedl, M1
Anderwald-Stadler, M1
Luger, A1
Pacher, R1
Hülsmann, M1
Mills, RM1
Afzal, R3
Floras, J2
Kasanuki, H1
Hagiwara, N1
Hosoda, S1
Sumiyoshi, T1
Honda, T1
Haze, K1
Nagashima, M1
Yamaguchi, J1
Origasa, H1
Urashima, M1
Jackson, CE1
Gerstein, HC2
Zetterstrand, S1
Mehta, PA1
McDonagh, S1
Phillips, J1
Grocott-Mason, R1
Dubrey, SW1
Lütken, SC1
Kim, SW1
Jonassen, T1
Marples, D1
Knepper, MA1
Kwon, TH1
Frøkiaer, J1
Nielsen, S1
Shah, RV1
Givertz, MM1
Wang, D10
Chang, SM1
Johansson, PA2
Kosolcharoen, P1
Murray, DR1
Dunlap, ME7
Zhang, GX1
Kimura, S1
Murao, K1
Yu, X1
Obata, K1
Matsuyoshi, H1
Takaki, M1
Suzuki, H3
Araki, R1
Massie, BM1
Eklind-Cervenka, M1
Benson, L1
Dahlström, U2
Edner, M1
Rosenqvist, M1
Grosso, AM1
Bodalia, PN1
Macallister, RJ1
Hingorani, AD1
Moon, JC1
Scott, MA1
Minhas, R1
Julius, S1
Rutten, FH1
Groenwold, RH1
Fruhwald, F1
Pieske, B1
Kaplan, N1
Oghlakian, GO1
Sipahi, I1
Fang, JC1
Kobayashi, D1
Murakami, S1
Oda, M1
Hanawa, H1
Kuroda, T1
Nakano, M1
Narita, I1
Desai, RJ1
Ashton, CM1
Deswal, A1
Morgan, RO1
Mehta, HB1
Chen, H1
Aparasu, RR1
Johnson, ML1
Ariti, CA2
Collier, TJ1
Suzuki, O1
Ishii, H1
Kobayashi, S1
Cleland, JG1
Svanström, H1
Pasternak, B1
Hviid, A1
Yang, W1
Joffe, MM1
Takeuchi, M1
Howlett, JG1
Campbell, RT1
Shimizu, T1
Komuro, I5
Hirayama, H1
Shimizu, K1
Yoshida, O1
Shinohara, H2
Fukuda, N1
Soeki, T1
Sakabe, K1
Onose, Y1
Tamura, Y1
Kinugawa, K1
Takahashi, T1
Nagai, R1
Terra, SG1
Gschwend, S1
Henning, RH1
Pinto, YM2
de Zeeuw, D2
van Gilst, WH2
Buikema, H1
White, HD1
Held, P5
Umemoto, S2
Kawahara, S1
Hashimoto, R1
Thai, H1
Wollmuth, J1
Goldman, S1
Gaballa, M1
Uchida, S1
Watanabe, H1
Nishio, S1
Hashimoto, H1
Yamazaki, K1
Hayashi, H1
Ohashi, K1
Winkler, G1
Jermendy, G1
Matos, L1
Stergren, J1
Owen, OG1
Pechlaner, C1
Gama, MG1
Rocha, G1
Mansour, J1
Peltier, M1
Oprisiu, R1
Achard, JM1
Fournier, A1
Möller, BH1
Penston, J1
Kondo, J1
Sone, T1
Tsuboi, H1
Mukawa, H1
Morishima, I1
Uesugi, M1
Kono, T1
Kosaka, T1
Yoshida, T1
Numaguchi, Y1
Matsui, H1
Murohara, T2
Okumura, K1
Kulbertus, H1
Masson, S2
Staszewsky, L1
Matsumori, A1
Fujita, T1
Mizukami, M1
Hasegawa, H2
Kohro, T1
Toko, H1
Kudoh, S1
Zou, Y1
Aburatani, H1
Füessl, HS1
Persson, H1
Yasumura, Y1
Miyatake, K1
Okamoto, H1
Miyauchi, T1
Kawana, M1
Tsutamoto, T1
Matsubara, H1
Takaoka, H1
Himeno, H1
Yokoyama, H1
Yokoya, K1
Shintani, U1
Hashimoto, K1
Koretsune, Y1
Nakamura, Y1
Imai, K1
Maruyama, S1
Masaoka, Y1
Sekiya, M1
Shiraki, T1
Ozono, K1
Matsuoka, T1
Miyao, Y1
Nomura, F1
Onishi, K1
Dohi, K1
Koji, T1
Funabiki, K1
Kitamura, T1
Imanaka-Yoshida, K1
Ito, M1
Nobori, T1
Nakano, T1
Kumagai, H1
Onami, T1
Takimoto, C1
Iigaya, K1
Saruta, T1
Tambara, K1
Fujita, M1
Sumita, Y1
Miyamoto, S1
Sekiguchi, H1
Eiho, S1
Komeda, M1
Kochsiek, K1
de Boer, RA1
Pokharel, S1
Flesch, M1
van Kampen, DA1
Suurmeijer, AJ1
Boomsma, F1
van Veldhuisen, DJ4
Dietz, R4
Fuchs, SA1
Meyboom, RH1
van Puijenbroek, EP1
Guchelaar, HJ1
Bhakta, S1
Stehlik, J1
Taylor, DO1
Finn, P1
Zornoff, L1
Michelson, E1
Granger, C2
Takahashi, M1
Tanonaka, K1
Yoshida, H1
Oikawa, R1
Koshimizu, M1
Daicho, T1
Toyo-Oka, T1
Takeo, S1
Kasama, S2
Toyama, T2
Kumakura, H2
Takayama, Y2
Ichikawa, S2
Suzuki, T2
Kurabayashi, M2
Kuwabara, Y1
Doggrell, SA1
Mitrovic, V2
Erhardt, LR1
Zeller, A1
Battegay, E1
Wilhelmsen, L1
Hennekens, CH2
Lewis, E1
Probstfield, JL2
Carlsson, J2
Ostergren, JB2
Probstfield, J2
McMurray, JV1
Wake, R1
Kim-Mitsuyama, S1
Izumi, Y1
Yoshida, K1
Izumiya, Y1
Yukimura, T1
Shiota, M1
Yoshiyama, M1
Yoshikawa, J1
Iwao, H1
Eichhorn, E1
Erhardt, L1
Hobbs, FD1
Krum, H1
Maggioni, A2
Piña, IL2
Soler-Soler, J1
Yan, RT1
Yan, AT1
Hall, C1
Kanno, Y2
Nakamura, T1
Takenaka, T1
Okuda, N1
Mori, T1
Inamoto, S1
Okabe, M1
Mieno, S1
Horimoto, H1
Kitaura, Y1
Mitchell, GF1
Arnold, JM1
O'Brien, TX1
Marchiori, G1
Warner, E1
Desai, SS1
Demers, C2
Barrios Alonso, V1
Escobar Cervantes, C1
Calderón Montero, A1
Anavekar, N1
Hillege, HL1
Nitsch, D1
Cornel, JH1
Clayton, T2
McEntegart, MB2
Lang, CC1
Roger, SD1
Wuerzner, G1
Burnier, M1
Olsson, L2
Hainer, J1
Earle, S1
Olsson, LG1
Tokuhisa, T1
Obayashi, M1
Noma, T1
Mochizuki, M1
Oda, T1
Okuda, S1
Doi, M1
Ikeda, Y1
Yamamoto, T1
Ohkusa, T1
Andersson, FL1
Stewart, S1
Svensson, K1
Solal, AC1
Vanhaecke, J1
Kowalczykowski, M1
Hollar, D1
Dunn, FG2
Momomura, S1
Tschöpe, C1
Schultheiss, HP1
Lamas, GA1
Halling, K1
Hudson, M1
Humphries, K1
Tu, JV1
Behlouli, H1
Pilote, L1
Dabouz, F1
Touyz, R1
Kudo, Y1
Akazawa, H1
Kinugawa, S2
Matsushima, S1
Ide, T1
Inoue, N1
Ohta, Y1
Yokota, T1
Hamaguchi, S1
Sunagawa, K1
Felker, GM1
Allen, LA1
Shaw, LK1
Kenchaiah, S1
Finn, PV1
Zornoff, LA1
Chan, AK1
Sanderson, JE1
Wang, T1
Lam, W1
Yip, G1
Wang, M1
Lam, YY1
Zhang, Y1
Yeung, L1
Wu, EB1
Chan, WW1
Wong, JT1
So, N1
Yu, CM1
Gremmler, B1
Kisters, K1
Kunert, M1
Schleiting, H1
Ulbricht, LJ1
Barrios, V1
Escobar, C1
Calderon, A1
Hainer, JW1
Sumino, H1
Matsumoto, N1
Ripley, TL1
Chonlahan, JS1
Germany, RE1
Weir, RA1
Shimano, M1
Tsuji, Y1
Inden, Y1
Kitamura, K1
Uchikawa, T1
Harata, S1
Nattel, S1
Wilson, LD1
Tsai, CT1
Varyani, F1
Kageyama, S1
Kirk, JK1
Pericak, D1
Avezum, A1
Burns, RJ1
Tsuyuki, RT1
Young, J1
Pogue, J1
Riegger, GA1
Voors, AA1
Rapezzi, C1
Ennezat, PV1
Berlowitz, M1
Sonnenblick, EH1
Le Jemtel, TH1
Martineau, P1
Goulet, J1
DiBona, GF1
Jones, SY1
Fruhwald, FM1
Kickenweiz, E1
Zweiker, R1
Klein, W1
Negassa, A1
Vaile, JC1
Chowdhary, S1
Osman, F1
Ross, HF1
Fletcher, J1
Littler, WA1
Coote, JH1
Townend, JN1
Ellis, GR1
Nightingale, AK1
Blackman, DJ1
Anderson, RA1
Mumford, C1
Timmins, G1
Lang, D1
Jackson, SK1
Penney, MD1
Lewis, MJ1
Frenneaux, MP1
Morris-Thurgood, J1
Willenbrock, R1
Philipp, S1

Clinical Trials (25)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Candesartan in Heart Fail. Assess. of Reduction in Mortality & Morbidity. Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure Who Are ACE Inhibitor Intolerant and Have Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634400]Phase 36,268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302]Phase 33,445 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634712]Phase 3734 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238]Phase 34,128 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634309]Phase 3597 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Effect of ACE Inhibitor Plus High Dose Candesartan on BNP and Inflammation in Patients With LV Dysfunction: Impact of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System Genetic Polymorphisms[NCT00400582]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction[NCT01035255]Phase 38,442 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated (stopped due to Early termination was approved due to compelling efficacy of LCZ696 in patients with HF & reduced EF after final pre-specified interim analysis 28-Mar-2014.)
Effects of APIXaban on BRAIN Protection in Patients With Sinus Rhythm and Heart Failure: APIXBRAIN-HF Trial[NCT04696120]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-02Not yet recruiting
Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Patients With Hypertension After Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Implantation[NCT00139386]Phase 41,119 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
PRospectIve Study of Sacubitril/ValsarTan on MyocardIal OxygenatioN and Fibrosis in PatiEnts With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT04128891]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not approved)
Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03837470]Early Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-06Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Convalescent Plasma for Adults With COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Double-blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Placebo-controlled Trial[NCT04345289]Phase 3147 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-01Terminated (stopped due to DSMB advise due to high probability of futility)
An Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Novel Mobile Health Monitoring Platform to Capture Patient-centered Outcomes Measures Among Patients With Heart Failure (HF)[NCT04191356]67 participants (Actual)Observational2020-10-17Terminated (stopped due to Collected enough data to support the Endpoints)
Phase 2/3 Study of Effect of AT1RB Versus ACE Inhibitor in Addition to XO Inhibitor on Progression of LV Remodeling and Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients With Acute MI.[NCT01052272]Phase 2/Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Randomized Study of the MitraClip Device in Heart Failure Patients With Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation[NCT01772108]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated (stopped due to As recruitment rate was lower than anticipated)
Mechanisms and Management of Exercise Intolerance in Older Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03111017]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-17Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction for Reduced Healthcare Utilization[NCT04327596]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-25Terminated (stopped due to lack of enrollment)
Effect of Dapagliflozin on Metabolomics and Cardiac Mechanics in Chronic Kidney Disease[NCT05719714]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Intravenous Levosimendan Compared With Dobutamine on Renal Hemodynamics and Function in Chronic Heart Failure[NCT02133105]Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure: Etiology, Comparisons With Renal Disease, and Relationships With Biomarkers and Left Ventricular Remodeling.[NCT00834691]180 participants (Anticipated)Observational2008-01-31Completed
Confirm Rx Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Primary Atrial Fibrillation Detection in High Risk Heart Failure Patients[NCT04818645]477 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-31Recruiting
Prognostic Value of Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Neonatal Sepsis in Patients Admitted at Assiut University Children Hospital.[NCT03403062]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-02-28Not yet recruiting
Gender Specific Registry in Subjects Hospitalized With Heart Failure in Santiago( GENESIS Registry): Pilot Heart Failure Registry Looking for Sex Analysis[NCT05960968]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-08-11Recruiting
A Randomized Study of Pocket Ultrasound Derived IVC Diameter for Guided Management of Heart Failure[NCT01962688]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Terminated (stopped due to low enrollment)
Effects of a Physical Therapist-driven Individualized Hybrid Model of the Exercise Component of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes: a Prospective Cohort Study[NCT06030115]100 participants (Actual)Observational2019-07-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Aborted Cardiac Arrest

First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo0.09
Spironolactone0.05

All-cause Mortality

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo4.6
Spironolactone4.2

Cardiovascular Mortality

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo3.1
Spironolactone2.8

Cardiovascular-related Hospitalization

Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo6.2
Spironolactone5.5

Chloride

Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo102.33
Spironolactone102.26

Composite Outcome of Cardiovascular Mortality or Cardiovascular-related Hospitalization (i.e., Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction(MI), Stroke, or the Management of Heart Failure), Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo7.8
Spironolactone7.2

Composite Outcome of Cardiovascular Mortality, Aborted Cardiac Arrest, or Hospitalization for the Management of Heart Failure, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo6.6
Spironolactone5.9

Composite Outcome of Sudden Death or Aborted Cardiac Arrest, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Composite Outcome of Sudden Death, Aborted Cardiac Arrest, or Hospitalization for the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Depression Symptoms, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.6
Spironolactone5.1

Deterioration of Renal Function

First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo2.2
Spironolactone3.2

Development of Atrial Fibrillation, Among Subjects Without a History of Atrial Fibrillation at Baseline.

First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.4
Spironolactone1.4

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo67.50
Spironolactone65.20

Hospitalization for Any Reason

First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo20.0
Spironolactone18.8

Hospitalization for the Management of Heart Failure

First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo4.6
Spironolactone3.8

Myocardial Infarction

First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.2

New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Among Subjects Without a History of Diabetes Mellitus at Baseline.

First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo0.7
Spironolactone0.7

Potassium

Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.32
Spironolactone4.49

Quality of Life, as Measured by McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.2
Spironolactone1.2

Quality of Life, as Measured by the EuroQOL Visual Analog Scale.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo65.9
Spironolactone66.4

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo63.1
Spironolactone64.4

Serum Creatinine

Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.11
Spironolactone1.17

Sodium

Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo140.95
Spironolactone140.33

Stroke

First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Total Hospitalizations (Including Repeat Hospitalizations) for the Management of Heart Failure

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo8.3
Spironolactone6.8

Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 14

Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo - Month 60.98
Irbesartan - Month 60.93
Placebo - Month 141.00
Irbesartan - Month 141.01

Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final Visit

NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - ImprovedMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - WorsenedMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 10 - ImprovedMonth 10 - UnchangedMonth 10 - WorsenedMonth 10 - Major EventMonth 10 - No DataMonth 14 - ImprovedMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - WorsenedMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - ImprovedFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - WorsenedFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined9369664810107948911584110993386661751329286589732460
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II5531041218442945310253828750222942230687511
Irbesartan Class III or IV88165678899046175318489557911531038864282924949
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined88110165114989029397142106902890698011988269410732057
Placebo Baseline Class I or II47338472114231763914393126216164225478665
Placebo Class III or IV83467841287860622833928635787641038404402925452

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 1873.4968.00-5.50
Irbesartan - Month 3074.3767.05-7.12
Irbesartan - Month 673.1369.21-3.91
Placebo - Month 1873.5870.88-2.69
Placebo - Month 3073.3469.51-4.02
Placebo - Month 673.0271.97-1.07

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 4274.9567.48-7.36
Irbesartan - Month 5475.1768.24-6.93
Irbesartan - Month 6671.8464.85-5.46
Placebo - Month 4274.3771.34-3.14
Placebo - Month 5475.2972.65-2.63
Placebo - Month 6663.4760.09-4.91

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final Visit

Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline MeanFinal Visit Mean
Irbesartan - Final Visit38.938.3
Placebo - Final Visit42.542.6

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14

Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Mean ScoreMean Score at TimepointAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Irbesartan - Month 1442.832.1-10.6
Irbesartan - Month 643.033.2-9.8
Placebo - Month 1442.731.6-11.2
Placebo - Month 642.732.9-10.0

Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)

Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECGParticipants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use36635
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use1089103
Placebo + ACE-I Use34429
Placebo no ACE-I Use110299

Participant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan255549512508832298121247519460476103281368153213382328460114643539576
Placebo276536501510832210711623253143050990391074146212339335461145753238478

Participant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan1935235045799728138122195513439525115481168153157361319479166803439576
Placebo20051947159610138137116182489443559109431674146178300337477176904238378

Participant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Event - No Data
Irbesartan2355525295376313881222345324615037830868153207378332480121522539676
Placebo2305635195296920871162065344505278235774146201339352495109762838378

Percentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan4.18.112.817.925.0
Placebo3.88.613.818.523.6

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage 1 YearPercentage 2 YearsPercentage 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan3.36.29.613.018.0
Placebo3.06.510.013.117.1

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan11.619.224.230.035.0
Placebo11.420.025.830.935.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan5.28.712.917.223.0
Placebo4.29.313.617.622.4

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan7.912.915.719.823.6
Placebo8.213.717.220.323.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan9.716.320.524.828.5
Placebo9.817.121.725.929.0

Percentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan12.320.726.432.939.2
Placebo12.121.328.434.239.5

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan0.72.13.14.65.2
Placebo1.22.83.95.46.2

Physician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan2305625335286017081292145464425077221575185180430344477117412336491
Placebo1985755295415816481321955374355487319679169186367361504117562835092

Change From Baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score

Change from baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score. KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. KCCQ clinical summary score is a composite assessment of physical limitations and total symptom scores. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 8

InterventionKCCQ Score (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696-2.99
Enalapril-4.63

Number of Patients - All-cause Mortality

Number of patients - All-cause mortality. All-cause mortality is common in Heart Failure HF patients this measures how many patients had this event. The data is on FAS population up to March 31, 2014 (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LCZ696711
Enalapril835

Number of Patients With First Confirmed Renal Dysfunction

Number of patients with first confirmed renal dysfunction (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LCZ69694
Enalapril108

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Percentage of participants with New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation The new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) analysis was based on a subset of FAS: i.e., for patients without a history of AF at baseline (patients with a history of AF were excluded from this analysis). (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LCZ6963.15
Enalapril3.15

Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization

Number of participants that had first occurrence of the composite endpoint, which is defined as either CV death or HF hospitalization due to HF. (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Primary CompositeCV death1st HF Hospitalization
Enalapril1117693658
LCZ696914558537

Number of Patients Reported With Adjudicated Primary Causes of Death

Number of patients reported with adjudicated primary causes of death. The data is on Randomization population up to March 31, 2014 (NCT01035255)
Timeframe: up to 51 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients who diedCV Death - Fatal MICV Death - Pump FailureCV Death - Sudden DeathCV Death - Presumed Sudden DeathCV Death - Presumed CV DeathCV Death - Fatal StrokeCV Death - Pulmonary EmbolismCV Death - CV proceduralOther CV DeathNon-CV death - InfectionNon-CV death - MalignancyNon-CV death - RenalNon-CV death - AccidentalNon-CV death - PulmonaryNon-CV death - SuicideNon-CV death - GIOther Non-CV deathUnknown Death
Enalapril8373318531123953434634411613110433
LCZ6967142514725126673043736411137416234

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

LVEF is a calculation of heart pump function determined from the volume after complete filling minus the volume after complete contraction divided by the volume after complete filling. A value of 55% or greater is normal. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil56.3656.8242.6252.3739.8856.33NA51.7054.17
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol52.6857.28NA56.1154.4657.8256.1755.7954.40
Ramipril52.1954.2064.9852.7652.1355.0251.2757.1850.73
Ramipril and Allopurinol53.3752.80NA51.7434.8954.05NA55.59NA

Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area (LVEDV/BSA)

LVEDV/BSA: As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The relation of heart blood volume to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionml/m^2 (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil78.0678.6093.5785.4490.2082.74NA84.2876.65
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol79.0378.01NA79.7563.184.9575.2779.7275.05
Ramipril73.0374.1073.2375.3481.1975.2871.9970.4648.68
Ramipril and Allopurinol78.5286.13NA83.95108.2567.96NA71.63NA

Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area (LVESV/BSA)

LVESV/BSA: The end systolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of contraction and is an index of the pump function of the heart. This relation to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionml/m^2 (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil35.2635.2653.8742.2754.0437.76NA41.7235.13
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol39.4934.15NA36.0728.7437.1832.9935.9934.22
Ramipril36.2034.7725.6436.8239.4235.3035.2331.1723.98
Ramipril and Allopurinol37.9142.88NA42.3470.4830.39NA31.56NA

Left Ventricular End-diastolic Mass Indexed to Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVED Mass/LVEDV)

LVED Mass/LVEDV: As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart blood volume, the mass indexed to end diastolic volume determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a three-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventiong/ml (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil0.950.830.670.780.700.79NA0.800.64
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol0.870.82NA0.860.680.800.690.820.69
Ramipril0.920.870.750.840.810.790.950.840.93
Ramipril and Allopurinol0.860.71NA0.720.570.83NA0.80NA

Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Radius to Wall Thickness (LVED Radius/Wall Thickness)

LVED Radius/Wall thickness As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart volume chamber diameter, the end-diastolic radius indexed to end diastolic wall thickness determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a two-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionunitless (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil3.143.394.143.684.103.71NA3.584.04
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol3.453.63NA3.423.903.564.243.564.29
Ramipril3.233.323.423.433.443.602.923.463.12
Ramipril and Allopurinol3.574.04NA4.014.573.60NA3.61NA

LV End Systolic Maximum Shortening (LVES Max Shortening)

By identifying three points in three different planes in the heart muscle, the maximum shortening is the average of the difference between the distance between these three points at the end of filling of the heart and the end of contraction divided by the length at the end of filling times 100. The maximum shortening is a three dimensional analysis. The higher values indicate a healthy heart. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionpercent of length at end of filling (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,17,18)Month 6(n=14,11,10,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=11,11,10,10)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,7,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil16.6817.5019.0817.1316.2817.55NA16.6220.38
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol16.0018.50NA18.5116.3617.5217.8917.8516.59
Ramipril15.8116.8818.4314.5717.0617.2616.6815.6713.70
Ramipril and Allopurinol15.8418.72NA17.9614.2217.46NA17.52NA

Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV

The Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV is calculated from the slope of the volume during the early filling of the heart with respect to time. The higher values indicate a very healthy heart muscle and lower values are indicative of a very stiff muscle. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Intervention1/sec (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil2.012.021.131.901.481.93NA1.651.10
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol2.01.98NA1.772.282.052.501.822.15
Ramipril1.931.742.501.802.021.911.692.051.34
Ramipril and Allopurinol2.112.03NA1.931.561.89NA1.88NA

Number of Participants Hospitalized for Cardiovascular Reasons

hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the outpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Handheld Ultrasound4
Clinical Assessment Only5

Number of Participants Hospitalized for Non-cardiac Reasons

hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the inpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Handheld Ultrasound6
Clinical Assessment Only18

Number of Participants in Each New York Heart Association Class

"New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.~Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity.~Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100m). Comfortable only at rest.~Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients." (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionvisits (Number)
NYHA Class INYHA Class IINYHA Class IIINYHA Class IV
Clinical Assessment Only118392
Handheld Ultrasound09220

Reviews

43 reviews available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure

ArticleYear
Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2020, 04-15, Volume: 125, Issue:8

    Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotens

2020
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Entresto a Possible Option.
    Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets, 2017, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals;

2017
[Heart failure with "mid-range" ejection fraction: a new clinical entity?]
    Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique, 2018, Volume: 75, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Comorbidity; Coronary Disease;

2018
Risk of Stroke in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart
    Circulation, 2015, Apr-28, Volume: 131, Issue:17

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds;

2015
The CHARM program: the effects of candesartan for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.
    Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 2009, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Female

2009
The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Journal of cardiac failure, 2010, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe

2010
Cardiovascular outcome of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, candesartan, in Japan.
    Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2010, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2010
Comparative clinical- and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 65, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2011
Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: have we been pursuing the wrong paradigm?
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011, Volume: 86, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2011
What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE?
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012, Dec-11, Volume: 60, Issue:23

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agents; Cli

2012
[Treatment for diastolic failure].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2003, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphe

2003
[Angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic heart failure].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2003, Volume: 61, Issue:9

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Heart Fai

2003
[Cardiologic and diabetologic aspects of therapy with angiotensin receptor blocking agents].
    Orvosi hetilap, 2003, Sep-21, Volume: 144, Issue:38

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents;

2003
Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure.
    Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2003, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart

2003
Valsartan for the treatment of heart failure.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2004, Volume: 5, Issue:1

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2004
[Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist on heart failure].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clini

2004
[Benefits of candesartan in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure--CHARM programme].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Failure

2004
[New treatment of heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockaders show promising results in an extensive study].
    Lakartidningen, 2004, Feb-26, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2004
[CHARM study--new strategy for the treatment of heart failure].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2004
[Organ protection by angiotensin II receptor blockers].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62 Suppl 3

    Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals;

2004
Candesartan for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2004, Volume: 5, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2004
[Ace inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for therapy of chronic heart failure].
    Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, 2005, Feb-10, Volume: 94, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimid

2005
A review of the current evidence for the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers in chronic heart failure.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2005, Volume: 59, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2005
[Angiotensin II receptor blockers--evidence along the cardiovascular continuum].
    Praxis, 2005, Apr-13, Volume: 94, Issue:15

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Ty

2005
[ARB II in chronic heart failure. Coincidences and divergences. Class effect?].
    Revista clinica espanola, 2005, Volume: 205, Issue:10

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart

2005
Effects of selective angiotensin II and beta1-receptor blockade on renal haemodynamics and sodium handling during orthostatic stress in healthy individuals.
    Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension, 2006, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

2006
Initial data supporting the design of the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension, 2006, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive

2006
[CHARM].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2006, Volume: 64 Suppl 6

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive

2006
Candesartan for the management of heart failure: more than an alternative.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2006, Volume: 7, Issue:14

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topi

2006
Improving outcomes in chronic heart failure.
    Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2006, Volume: 42 Suppl C

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Agents;

2006
[Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2007, Apr-28, Volume: 65 Suppl 4

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topi

2007
[Pharmocological therapeutics for chronic heart failure--how to use ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2007, May-28, Volume: 65 Suppl 5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2007
[Diabetic heart disease].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2007, May-28, Volume: 65 Suppl 5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2007
Candesartan: from left ventricular hypertrophy to heart failure, a global approach.
    Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 2007, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2007
Candesartan in heart failure.
    Clinical interventions in aging, 2006, Volume: 1, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Death, Sudden; Heart Fa

2006
[Clinical trials of ACE inhibitors and ARB for treatment of patients with hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy in Japan--special reference to the dosage schedule and adverse effects].
    Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica, 2008, Volume: 131, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2008
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy.
    American family physician, 1999, Volume: 59, Issue:11

    Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihype

1999
[ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonists?].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1999, Sep-24, Volume: 124 Suppl 2

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme In

1999
Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Current cardiology reports, 2000, Volume: 2, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl

2000
New competition in the realm of renin-angiotensin axis inhibition; the angiotensin II receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2001, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents;

2001
Angiotensin receptor blockers for chronic heart failure and acute myocardial infarction.
    Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2001, Volume: 86, Issue:1

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Convertin

2001
[Angiotensin I receptor blockers for heart failure].
    Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2001, Volume: 151, Issue:7-8

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents;

2001
Neurohumoral blockade in CHF management.
    Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2000, Volume: 1 Suppl 1

    Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazo

2000

Trials

64 trials available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure

ArticleYear
Adherence-adjustment in placebo-controlled randomized trials: An application to the candesartan in heart failure randomized trial.
    Contemporary clinical trials, 2020, Volume: 90

    Topics: Age Factors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heal

2020
Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
    JACC. Heart failure, 2020, Volume: 8, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Double

2020
Contribution of cardiac and extra-cardiac disease burden to risk of cardiovascular outcomes varies by ejection fraction in heart failure.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; C

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; E

2018
A prospective study of the impact of AGTR1 A1166C on the effects of candesartan in patients with heart failure.
    Pharmacogenomics, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood

2018
Rationale and Design of the Multicenter Trial on Japan Working Group on the Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Selection (Azilsartan vs. Candesartan) on Diastolic Function in the Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2018
Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure.
    Journal of cardiology, 2013, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Asian People; Benzimidazole

2013
Influence of previous heart failure hospitalization on cardiovascular events in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.
    Circulation. Heart failure, 2014, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Echocardiography

2014
Prognostic importance of temporal changes in resting heart rate in heart failure patients: an analysis of the CHARM program.
    European heart journal, 2015, Mar-14, Volume: 36, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease;

2015
International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
    Circulation, 2015, Jan-06, Volume: 131, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2015
A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure.
    European heart journal, 2015, Feb-14, Volume: 36, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Ang

2015
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with angina and heart failure in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds;

2015
Impact of candesartan on cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease: The 4C trial.
    Journal of cardiology, 2016, Volume: 67, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular

2016
Effects of AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism in patients with heart failure treated with candesartan.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2008, Volume: 42, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme I

2008
Weight loss and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure in the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European heart journal, 2008, Volume: 29, Issue:21

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphe

2008
Benefits and safety of candesartan treatment in heart failure are independent of age: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity programme.
    European heart journal, 2008, Volume: 29, Issue:24

    Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blocke

2008
Impact of hospitalization for acute coronary events on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    European heart journal, 2009, Volume: 30, Issue:3

    Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina, Unstable; Angiotensin II

2009
Interactions of glucose metabolism and chronic heart failure.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2009, Volume: 117, Issue:3

    Topics: Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Chronic Di

2009
Effects of enalapril, candesartan or both on neurohumoral activation and LV volumes and function in patients with heart failure not treated with a beta-blocker.
    Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease, 2009, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E

2009
Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in
    European heart journal, 2009, Volume: 30, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidaz

2009
Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for heart failure patients: is combination treatment a feasible prospect?
    Clinical cardiology, 2009, Volume: 32, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzy

2009
Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with heart failure receiving bronchodilators in the CHARM programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Bronchodilator Agents; Comorbidity; Female; Heart Failure;

2010
Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockade are not modified by aspirin in patients with chronic heart failure: a cohort study from the Candesartan in Heart failure--Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Benzimida

2010
Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012, May-15, Volume: 59, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2012
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2003
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2003
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2003
Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive A

2003
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles;

2003
Comparative impact of enalapril, candesartan or metoprolol alone or in combination on ventricular remodelling in patients with congestive heart failure.
    European heart journal, 2003, Volume: 24, Issue:19

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents;

2003
Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease.
    American heart journal, 2003, Volume: 146, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronar

2003
[Clinical study of the month. The CHARM study].
    Revue medicale de Liege, 2003, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2003
[Effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist on heart failure].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clini

2004
Rationale for the use of combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in heart failure.
    Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 2004, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2004
Beneficial effect of candesartan treatment on cardiac autonomic nervous activity in patients with chronic heart failure: simultaneous recording of ambulatory electrocardiogram and posture.
    Clinical cardiology, 2004, Volume: 27, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Autonomic Nervous System; Benzimid

2004
[Angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure. CHARM Study].
    Der Internist, 2004, Volume: 45, Issue:9

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2004
Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    Circulation, 2004, Oct-12, Volume: 110, Issue:15

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Canada; Cardiovas

2004
Effect of candesartan on New York Heart Association functional class. Results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European heart journal, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:21

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; H

2004
Effects of candesartan on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with congestive heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, Mar-01, Volume: 45, Issue:5

    Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihyperte

2005
CHARMed - the effects of candesartan in heart failure.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2005, Volume: 6, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl

2005
Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure.
    Circulation, 2005, Jul-05, Volume: 112, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2005
Usefulness of temporal changes in neurohormones as markers of ventricular remodeling and prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure receiving either candesartan or enalapril or both.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2005, Sep-01, Volume: 96, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2005
Effects of candesartan on cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese hypertensive patients.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pres

2005
An angiotensin receptor blocker reduces the risk of congestive heart failure in elderly hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; C

2005
Pulsatile hemodynamic effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM Program.
    European journal of heart failure, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Aorta; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2006
Should chronic heart failure patients with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction receive angiotensin-receptor blockers?
    Nature clinical practice. Cardiovascular medicine, 2005, Volume: 2, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; D

2005
Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients.
    Circulation, 2005, Dec-13, Volume: 112, Issue:24

    Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Female; Heart Fai

2005
Angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan in heart failure: findings from the Candesartan in Heart failure--assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension, 2006, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihyperte

2006
Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006, May-16, Volume: 47, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun

2006
Resource utilization and costs in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European heart journal, 2006, Volume: 27, Issue:12

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Pacing, Artific

2006
Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme.
    Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007, Volume: 93, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com

2007
[Cardioprotection by means of Candesartan in cardiac insufficiency. CHARM overall partial evaluation (Candesartan in heart failure assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity)].
    Der Internist, 2006, Volume: 47, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agent

2006
Effects of combined candesartan and ACE inhibitors on BNP, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, and glucose regulation in patients with symptomatic heart failure.
    Journal of cardiac failure, 2007, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2007
Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    Circulation, 2007, Jun-19, Volume: 115, Issue:24

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; Female; Follow-Up

2007
Body mass index and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    Circulation, 2007, Aug-07, Volume: 116, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies; Double

2007
Aldosterone receptor antagonism induces reverse remodeling when added to angiotensin receptor blockade in chronic heart failure.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007, Aug-14, Volume: 50, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Meth

2007
Effects of different AT1-receptor antagonists in the therapy of severe heart failure pretreated with ACE inhibitors.
    Acta cardiologica, 2007, Volume: 62, Issue:4

    Topics: Acrylates; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-C

2007
Additive effects of spironolactone and candesartan on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and left ventricular remodeling in patients with congestive heart failure.
    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2007, Volume: 48, Issue:12

    Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compo

2007
Efficacy and tolerability of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with heart failure already receiving an angiotensin-converting inhibitor plus aldosterone antagonist, with or without a beta blocker. Findings from the Candesartan in Heart fa
    European journal of heart failure, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2008
Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European heart journal, 2008, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetic Angiopat

2008
Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators.
    Circulation, 1999, Sep-07, Volume: 100, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure;

1999
[Comparison of candesartan, enalapril and their combination in congestive heart failure].
    Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology, 2000, Volume: 1, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents;

2000
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure.
    American heart journal, 2001, Volume: 142, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound

2001
Effects of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockade on cardiac vagal control in heart failure.
    Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2001, Volume: 101, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Baroreflex; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2001
Addition of candesartan to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure does not reduce levels of oxidative stress.
    European journal of heart failure, 2002, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biph

2002

Other Studies

91 other studies available for candesartan and Cardiac Failure

ArticleYear
Heart Failure Population with Therapeutic Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan, Spironolactone and Candesartan: FDA Perspective.
    Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure;

2022
Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme.
    ESC heart failure, 2022, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Genome-Wide Association Study; Heart Failure; Humans; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Randomized Controlled

2022
Population Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
    Clinical and translational science, 2021, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biological Vari

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Angiotensin receptor blocker use and gastro-oesophageal cancer survival: a population-based cohort study.
    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2018, Volume: 47, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphen

2018
Seeking therapeutic precision in heart failure: is ejection fraction really the way? Deconstructing the CHARM of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.
    European journal of heart failure, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles

2018
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
    JACC. Heart failure, 2019, Volume: 7, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2019
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for patients with chronic heart failure: the next step forward.
    Journal of cardiology, 2013, Volume: 61, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure

2013
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2013, Sep-03, Volume: 185, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compo

2013
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of young and very young adults with heart failure: The CHARM programme (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity).
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, Nov-12, Volume: 62, Issue:20

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; E

2013
Dosage of angiotensin-II receptor blockers in heart failure patients following changes in Danish drug reimbursement policies.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2014, Volume: 23, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Denmark; Female; Heart F

2014
Regional differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction trials: when nephrology meets cardiology but east does not meet west.
    Circulation, 2015, Jan-06, Volume: 131, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Fluorobenzenes; Geography; Heart Failure; Humans; Intern

2015
Successful Treatment with an Antihypertensive Drug Regimen Including Eplerenone in a Patient with Malignant Phase Hypertension with Renal Failure.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2015, Volume: 54, Issue:19

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cal

2015
Worsening renal function and outcome in heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and the impact of angiotensin receptor blocker treatment: data from the CHARM-study programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Disease Prog

2016
Selective type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates oxidative stress and regulates angiotensin II receptors in the canine failing heart.
    Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2008, Volume: 317, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Aldehydes; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2008
Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) and resource utilization and costs in Italy.
    Vascular health and risk management, 2008, Volume: 4, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis;

2008
Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008, Dec-09, Volume: 52, Issue:24

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Diastole; Female;

2008
The heart failure frequent flyer: an urban legend.
    Clinical cardiology, 2009, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2009
Albuminuria in chronic heart failure: prevalence and prognostic importance.
    Lancet (London, England), 2009, Aug-15, Volume: 374, Issue:9689

    Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphen

2009
Changes of renal AQP2, ENaC, and NHE3 in experimentally induced heart failure: response to angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade.
    American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2009, Volume: 297, Issue:6

    Topics: 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

2009
HEAAL: the final chapter in the story of angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure--lessons learnt from a decade of trials.
    European journal of heart failure, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2010
Effects of angiotensin type I receptor blockade on the cardiac Raf/MEK/ERK cascade activated via adrenergic receptors.
    Journal of pharmacological sciences, 2010, Volume: 113, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents;

2010
Is the effect of angiotensin receptor blockade in patients with heart failure modified by treatment with aspirin? The answer is not so clear!
    European journal of heart failure, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Benzimida

2010
Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure.
    JAMA, 2011, Jan-12, Volume: 305, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause

2011
Waste not, want not: free money, moral hazard and value-based prescribing.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 65, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure;

2011
Easy money? Health cost savings resulting from the switch from a branded drug to a low-cost generic drug in the same class.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 65, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure;

2011
[Remarkable results with candesartan].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2011, Volume: 155

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relations

2011
Candesartan vs losartan and mortality in patients with heart failure.
    JAMA, 2011, Apr-20, Volume: 305, Issue:15

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Europe; Guideline Adherence; H

2011
Candesartan vs losartan and mortality in patients with heart failure.
    JAMA, 2011, Apr-20, Volume: 305, Issue:15

    Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heart Failure; Humans; Losarta

2011
Cardiac AA amyloidosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: the therapeutic potential of biological reagents.
    Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 2011, Volume: 40, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amyloidosis; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Benzimidazo

2011
Comparative effectiveness of individual angiotensin receptor blockers on risk of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Confoun

2012
The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities.
    European heart journal, 2012, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds;

2012
Effects of an angiotensin 2 receptor blocker plus diuretic combination drug in chronic heart failure complicated by hypertension.
    The Journal of international medical research, 2011, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds;

2011
Days alive and out of hospital and the patient journey in patients with heart failure: Insights from the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    American heart journal, 2011, Volume: 162, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2011
Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan and mortality among patients with heart failure.
    JAMA, 2012, Apr-11, Volume: 307, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2012
Subtle issues in model specification and estimation of marginal structural models.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans;

2012
Does slow and steady win the race?
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012, May-15, Volume: 59, Issue:20

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure;

2012
[Drug therapies following heart failure and myocardial infarction(discussion)].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2002, Volume: 60, Issue:6

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimidazoles;

2002
Effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on [(123)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial imaging findings and neurohumoral factors in chronic heart failure.
    Heart and vessels, 2002, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: 3-Iodobenzylguanidine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angio

2002
Cardiology patient page. Angiotensin receptor blockers.
    Circulation, 2003, Jun-24, Volume: 107, Issue:24

    Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Bip

2003
Myogenic constriction is increased in mesenteric resistance arteries from rats with chronic heart failure: instantaneous counteraction by acute AT1 receptor blockade.
    British journal of pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 139, Issue:7

    Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2003
Candesartan and heart failure: the allure of CHARM.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Sep-06, Volume: 362, Issue:9386

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound

2003
Angiotensin subtype 1 rReceptor (AT1) blockade improves vasorelaxation in heart failure by up-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase via activation of the AT2 receptor.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2003, Volume: 307, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Arteries; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blot

2003
Altered pharmacokinetics and excessive hypotensive effect of candesartan in a patient with the CYP2C91/3 genotype.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2003, Volume: 74, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Area Unde

2003
[AT1 blockers against heart failure. The charm of polypharmacy].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, Sep-18, Volume: 145, Issue:38

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2003
ARBs reduce heart-failure deaths, hospitalizations.
    Health news (Waltham, Mass.), 2003, Volume: 9, Issue:11

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Agents; Heart F

2003
EUROPA shows role for ACE inhibition in low-risk CHD.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2003, Volume: 57, Issue:8

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compound

2003
The CHARM programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 362, Issue:9396

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2003
The CHARM programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 362, Issue:9396

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2003
The CHARM programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 362, Issue:9396

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2003
The CHARM programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 362, Issue:9396

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2003
The CHARM programme.
    Lancet (London, England), 2003, Nov-15, Volume: 362, Issue:9396

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2003
[Treatment of heart failure in the 21st century--the position of ARB in view of therapy and preventive medicine: discussion].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2004, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Tetrazoles

2004
Gene expression profile revealed different effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on heart failure.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 42 Suppl 1

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzazepines; B

2003
Implications of recent clinical trials for heart failure performance measures.
    Journal of cardiac failure, 2004, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents;

2004
Angiotensin receptor blockers and heart failure: still CHARMing after VALIANT?
    European heart journal, 2004, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive

2004
[Acute coronary syndrome you can hear the prognosis].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, Feb-05, Volume: 146, Issue:6

    Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Arte

2004
[Candesartan reduces the risk of mortality and recurrence of chronic heart failure. Important results from the CHARM study].
    Lakartidningen, 2004, Feb-26, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2004
Candesartan prevents myocardial fibrosis during progression of congestive heart failure.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2004, Volume: 43, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Disease Progression; Dogs; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Mal

2004
Extracellular signal regulated kinase and SMAD signaling both mediate the angiotensin II driven progression towards overt heart failure in homozygous TGR(mRen2)27.
    Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2004, Volume: 82, Issue:10

    Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Atr

2004
[AT 1-blocker can be given in addition to ACE inhibitor and beta blocker. "Triple therapy decidedly well tolerated even in severe heart failure"].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2004, May-27, Volume: 146, Issue:22

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2004
Use of angiotensin receptor antagonists in patients with ACE inhibitor induced angioedema.
    Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2004, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Angioedema; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-C

2004
Angiotensin-receptor blockers in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM trial.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2004, Volume: 71, Issue:8

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive

2004
And an ARB makes nine: polypharmacy in patients with heart failure.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2004, Volume: 71, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com

2004
Effects of ACE inhibitor and AT1 blocker on dystrophin-related proteins and calpain in failing heart.
    Cardiovascular research, 2005, Feb-01, Volume: 65, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blotting, Wes

2005
[Conclusions from CHARM interview with Prof. Veselin Mitrovich, Bad Nauheim. Strong evidence: more help for weak hearts].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2005, Mar-31, Volume: 147, Issue:13

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2005
The data monitoring experience in the Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    American heart journal, 2005, Volume: 149, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; B

2005
Patient perception of the effect of treatment with candesartan in heart failure. Results of the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2005, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Health St

2005
Beneficial effect of candesartan on rat diastolic heart failure.
    Journal of pharmacological sciences, 2005, Volume: 98, Issue:4

    Topics: Aldehydes; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Com

2005
Practical recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: putting guidelines into practice.
    European journal of heart failure, 2005, Volume: 7, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibit

2005
Nifedipine enhances the cardioprotective effect of an angiotensin-II receptor blocker in an experimental animal model of heart failure.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Weight; C

2005
Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure.
    JAMA, 2005, Oct-12, Volume: 294, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds;

2005
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
    Circulation, 2006, Feb-07, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2006
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
    Circulation, 2006, Feb-07, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2006
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
    Circulation, 2006, Feb-07, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2006
Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure.
    Circulation, 2006, Feb-07, Volume: 113, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Fai

2006
Clinical correlates and consequences of anemia in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Program.
    Circulation, 2006, Feb-21, Volume: 113, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Anemia; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure;

2006
Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    American heart journal, 2006, Volume: 151, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun

2006
Relationship of dose of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to the benefits of candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Added trial.
    American heart journal, 2006, Volume: 151, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazo

2006
AT1 receptor antagonist restores cardiac ryanodine receptor function, rendering isoproterenol-induced failing heart less susceptible to Ca2+ -leak induced by oxidative stress.
    Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 2006, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium; Calci

2006
Prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure by candesartan in the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    American heart journal, 2006, Volume: 152, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compoun

2006
Lack of deleterious interaction between angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers in the treatment of patients with heart failure.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2006
Characterization of health-related quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved versus low ejection fraction in CHARM.
    European journal of heart failure, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Co

2007
Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme.
    European journal of heart failure, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Bundle-Branch Blo

2007
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect?
    Pharmacotherapy, 2007, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles;

2007
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker attenuates myocardial remodeling and preserves diastolic function in diabetic heart.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2007, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blo

2007
Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007, Jul-03, Volume: 50, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Databases as T

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Incidence and predictors of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure: an analysis of the CHARM Program.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007, Nov-13, Volume: 50, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2007
Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator, attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation promotion in rabbits with congestive heart failure.
    Heart rhythm, 2008, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimi

2008
Heart failure-related atrial fibrillation: a new model for a new prevention strategy?
    Heart rhythm, 2008, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Comp

2008
Blockade of the renin angiotensin system in heart failure: the potential place of angiotensin II receptor blockers.
    European heart journal, 2000, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl

2000
AT(1) receptor antagonists-beyond blood pressure control: possible place in heart failure treatment.
    Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2000, Volume: 84 Suppl 1

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Bi

2000
Sodium intake influences hemodynamic and neural responses to angiotensin receptor blockade in rostral ventrolateral medulla.
    Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2001, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals;

2001