Page last updated: 2024-10-24

candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden

candesartan has been researched along with Cardiac Arrest, Sudden in 9 studies

candesartan: a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist
candesartan : A benzimidazolecarboxylic acid that is 1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid substituted by an ethoxy group at position 2 and a ({2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl}methyl) group at position 1. It is a angiotensin receptor antagonist used for the treatment of hypertension.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)."9.14Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009)
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction."9.11Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004)
" In this sub-analysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial, we aimed to compare the effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension and to determine their optimal target blood pressures (BPs)."7.74The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial. ( Fujimoto, A; Fukiyama, K; Fukui, T; Matsuoka, H; Nakao, K; Oba, K; Ogihara, T; Saruta, T; Shimamoto, K; Ueshima, K, 2008)
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)."5.14Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009)
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction."5.11Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004)
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i."3.91Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019)
" In this sub-analysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial, we aimed to compare the effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension and to determine their optimal target blood pressures (BPs)."3.74The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial. ( Fujimoto, A; Fukiyama, K; Fukui, T; Matsuoka, H; Nakao, K; Oba, K; Ogihara, T; Saruta, T; Shimamoto, K; Ueshima, K, 2008)
"Candesartan treatment reduced primary end point risk (5."2.71Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. ( Kondo, J; Kono, T; Kosaka, T; Matsui, H; Morishima, I; Mukawa, H; Murohara, T; Numaguchi, Y; Okumura, K; Sone, T; Tsuboi, H; Uesugi, M; Yoshida, T, 2003)

Research

Studies (9)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (11.11)18.2507
2000's6 (66.67)29.6817
2010's1 (11.11)24.3611
2020's1 (11.11)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Shen, L2
Jhund, PS2
Anand, IS2
Carson, PE2
Desai, AS2
Granger, CB4
Køber, L1
Komajda, M2
McKelvie, RS2
Pfeffer, MA4
Solomon, SD4
Swedberg, K4
Zile, MR2
McMurray, JJV2
Docherty, KF1
Petrie, MC1
Ogihara, T1
Nakao, K1
Fukui, T1
Fukiyama, K1
Fujimoto, A1
Ueshima, K1
Oba, K1
Shimamoto, K1
Matsuoka, H1
Saruta, T1
Kasanuki, H1
Hagiwara, N1
Hosoda, S1
Sumiyoshi, T1
Honda, T1
Haze, K1
Nagashima, M1
Yamaguchi, J1
Origasa, H1
Urashima, M1
Ogawa, H1
Kondo, J1
Sone, T1
Tsuboi, H1
Mukawa, H1
Morishima, I1
Uesugi, M1
Kono, T1
Kosaka, T1
Yoshida, T1
Numaguchi, Y1
Matsui, H1
Murohara, T1
Okumura, K1
Wang, D1
Finn, P1
Skali, H2
Zornoff, L1
McMurray, JJ2
Yusuf, S2
Michelson, EL2
Pocock, S2
Momomura, S1
Dobson, J1
Young, JB1
Riegger, GA1

Clinical Trials (9)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634712]Phase 3734 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238]Phase 34,128 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302]Phase 33,445 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) Trial of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients[NCT00125463]Phase 33,200 participants Interventional2001-09-30Active, not recruiting
Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Patients With Hypertension After Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Implantation[NCT00139386]Phase 41,119 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Phase 2/3 Study of Effect of AT1RB Versus ACE Inhibitor in Addition to XO Inhibitor on Progression of LV Remodeling and Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients With Acute MI.[NCT01052272]Phase 2/Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Gender Specific Registry in Subjects Hospitalized With Heart Failure in Santiago( GENESIS Registry): Pilot Heart Failure Registry Looking for Sex Analysis[NCT05960968]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-08-11Recruiting
A Randomized Study of Pocket Ultrasound Derived IVC Diameter for Guided Management of Heart Failure[NCT01962688]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Terminated (stopped due to low enrollment)
A Randomized Study of the MitraClip Device in Heart Failure Patients With Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation[NCT01772108]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated (stopped due to As recruitment rate was lower than anticipated)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 14

Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo - Month 60.98
Irbesartan - Month 60.93
Placebo - Month 141.00
Irbesartan - Month 141.01

Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final Visit

NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - ImprovedMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - WorsenedMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 10 - ImprovedMonth 10 - UnchangedMonth 10 - WorsenedMonth 10 - Major EventMonth 10 - No DataMonth 14 - ImprovedMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - WorsenedMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - ImprovedFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - WorsenedFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined9369664810107948911584110993386661751329286589732460
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II5531041218442945310253828750222942230687511
Irbesartan Class III or IV88165678899046175318489557911531038864282924949
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined88110165114989029397142106902890698011988269410732057
Placebo Baseline Class I or II47338472114231763914393126216164225478665
Placebo Class III or IV83467841287860622833928635787641038404402925452

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 1873.4968.00-5.50
Irbesartan - Month 3074.3767.05-7.12
Irbesartan - Month 673.1369.21-3.91
Placebo - Month 1873.5870.88-2.69
Placebo - Month 3073.3469.51-4.02
Placebo - Month 673.0271.97-1.07

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 4274.9567.48-7.36
Irbesartan - Month 5475.1768.24-6.93
Irbesartan - Month 6671.8464.85-5.46
Placebo - Month 4274.3771.34-3.14
Placebo - Month 5475.2972.65-2.63
Placebo - Month 6663.4760.09-4.91

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final Visit

Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline MeanFinal Visit Mean
Irbesartan - Final Visit38.938.3
Placebo - Final Visit42.542.6

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14

Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Mean ScoreMean Score at TimepointAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Irbesartan - Month 1442.832.1-10.6
Irbesartan - Month 643.033.2-9.8
Placebo - Month 1442.731.6-11.2
Placebo - Month 642.732.9-10.0

Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)

Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECGParticipants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use36635
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use1089103
Placebo + ACE-I Use34429
Placebo no ACE-I Use110299

Participant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan255549512508832298121247519460476103281368153213382328460114643539576
Placebo276536501510832210711623253143050990391074146212339335461145753238478

Participant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan1935235045799728138122195513439525115481168153157361319479166803439576
Placebo20051947159610138137116182489443559109431674146178300337477176904238378

Participant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Event - No Data
Irbesartan2355525295376313881222345324615037830868153207378332480121522539676
Placebo2305635195296920871162065344505278235774146201339352495109762838378

Percentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan4.18.112.817.925.0
Placebo3.88.613.818.523.6

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage 1 YearPercentage 2 YearsPercentage 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan3.36.29.613.018.0
Placebo3.06.510.013.117.1

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan11.619.224.230.035.0
Placebo11.420.025.830.935.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan5.28.712.917.223.0
Placebo4.29.313.617.622.4

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan7.912.915.719.823.6
Placebo8.213.717.220.323.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan9.716.320.524.828.5
Placebo9.817.121.725.929.0

Percentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan12.320.726.432.939.2
Placebo12.121.328.434.239.5

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan0.72.13.14.65.2
Placebo1.22.83.95.46.2

Physician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan2305625335286017081292145464425077221575185180430344477117412336491
Placebo1985755295415816481321955374355487319679169186367361504117562835092

Aborted Cardiac Arrest

First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo0.09
Spironolactone0.05

All-cause Mortality

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo4.6
Spironolactone4.2

Cardiovascular Mortality

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo3.1
Spironolactone2.8

Cardiovascular-related Hospitalization

Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo6.2
Spironolactone5.5

Chloride

Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo102.33
Spironolactone102.26

Composite Outcome of Cardiovascular Mortality or Cardiovascular-related Hospitalization (i.e., Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction(MI), Stroke, or the Management of Heart Failure), Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo7.8
Spironolactone7.2

Composite Outcome of Cardiovascular Mortality, Aborted Cardiac Arrest, or Hospitalization for the Management of Heart Failure, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo6.6
Spironolactone5.9

Composite Outcome of Sudden Death or Aborted Cardiac Arrest, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Composite Outcome of Sudden Death, Aborted Cardiac Arrest, or Hospitalization for the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia, Whichever Occurred First

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Depression Symptoms, as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.6
Spironolactone5.1

Deterioration of Renal Function

First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo2.2
Spironolactone3.2

Development of Atrial Fibrillation, Among Subjects Without a History of Atrial Fibrillation at Baseline.

First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.4
Spironolactone1.4

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo67.50
Spironolactone65.20

Hospitalization for Any Reason

First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo20.0
Spironolactone18.8

Hospitalization for the Management of Heart Failure

First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo4.6
Spironolactone3.8

Myocardial Infarction

First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.2

New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Among Subjects Without a History of Diabetes Mellitus at Baseline.

First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo0.7
Spironolactone0.7

Potassium

Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.32
Spironolactone4.49

Quality of Life, as Measured by McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.2
Spironolactone1.2

Quality of Life, as Measured by the EuroQOL Visual Analog Scale.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo65.9
Spironolactone66.4

Quality of Life, as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo63.1
Spironolactone64.4

Serum Creatinine

Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.11
Spironolactone1.17

Sodium

Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionmEq/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo140.95
Spironolactone140.33

Stroke

First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo1.1
Spironolactone1.0

Total Hospitalizations (Including Repeat Hospitalizations) for the Management of Heart Failure

(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.

InterventionEvents per 100 person-years (Number)
Placebo8.3
Spironolactone6.8

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

LVEF is a calculation of heart pump function determined from the volume after complete filling minus the volume after complete contraction divided by the volume after complete filling. A value of 55% or greater is normal. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil56.3656.8242.6252.3739.8856.33NA51.7054.17
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol52.6857.28NA56.1154.4657.8256.1755.7954.40
Ramipril52.1954.2064.9852.7652.1355.0251.2757.1850.73
Ramipril and Allopurinol53.3752.80NA51.7434.8954.05NA55.59NA

Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area (LVEDV/BSA)

LVEDV/BSA: As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The relation of heart blood volume to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionml/m^2 (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil78.0678.6093.5785.4490.2082.74NA84.2876.65
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol79.0378.01NA79.7563.184.9575.2779.7275.05
Ramipril73.0374.1073.2375.3481.1975.2871.9970.4648.68
Ramipril and Allopurinol78.5286.13NA83.95108.2567.96NA71.63NA

Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area (LVESV/BSA)

LVESV/BSA: The end systolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of contraction and is an index of the pump function of the heart. This relation to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionml/m^2 (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil35.2635.2653.8742.2754.0437.76NA41.7235.13
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol39.4934.15NA36.0728.7437.1832.9935.9934.22
Ramipril36.2034.7725.6436.8239.4235.3035.2331.1723.98
Ramipril and Allopurinol37.9142.88NA42.3470.4830.39NA31.56NA

Left Ventricular End-diastolic Mass Indexed to Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVED Mass/LVEDV)

LVED Mass/LVEDV: As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart blood volume, the mass indexed to end diastolic volume determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a three-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventiong/ml (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil0.950.830.670.780.700.79NA0.800.64
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol0.870.82NA0.860.680.800.690.820.69
Ramipril0.920.870.750.840.810.790.950.840.93
Ramipril and Allopurinol0.860.71NA0.720.570.83NA0.80NA

Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Radius to Wall Thickness (LVED Radius/Wall Thickness)

LVED Radius/Wall thickness As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart volume chamber diameter, the end-diastolic radius indexed to end diastolic wall thickness determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a two-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionunitless (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil3.143.394.143.684.103.71NA3.584.04
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol3.453.63NA3.423.903.564.243.564.29
Ramipril3.233.323.423.433.443.602.923.463.12
Ramipril and Allopurinol3.574.04NA4.014.573.60NA3.61NA

LV End Systolic Maximum Shortening (LVES Max Shortening)

By identifying three points in three different planes in the heart muscle, the maximum shortening is the average of the difference between the distance between these three points at the end of filling of the heart and the end of contraction divided by the length at the end of filling times 100. The maximum shortening is a three dimensional analysis. The higher values indicate a healthy heart. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Interventionpercent of length at end of filling (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,17,18)Month 6(n=14,11,10,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=11,11,10,10)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,7,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil16.6817.5019.0817.1316.2817.55NA16.6220.38
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol16.0018.50NA18.5116.3617.5217.8917.8516.59
Ramipril15.8116.8818.4314.5717.0617.2616.6815.6713.70
Ramipril and Allopurinol15.8418.72NA17.9614.2217.46NA17.52NA

Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV

The Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV is calculated from the slope of the volume during the early filling of the heart with respect to time. The higher values indicate a very healthy heart muscle and lower values are indicative of a very stiff muscle. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)

,,,
Intervention1/sec (Mean)
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18)Month 6(n=14,11,11,12)Month 9(n=1,2,0,0)Month 12(n=12,11,11,11)Month 15(n=3,2,1,1)Month 18(n=10,12,8,8)Month 21(n=3,0,0,1)Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10)Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1)
Candesartan Cilexetil2.012.021.131.901.481.93NA1.651.10
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol2.01.98NA1.772.282.052.501.822.15
Ramipril1.931.742.501.802.021.911.692.051.34
Ramipril and Allopurinol2.112.03NA1.931.561.89NA1.88NA

Number of Participants Hospitalized for Cardiovascular Reasons

hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the outpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Handheld Ultrasound4
Clinical Assessment Only5

Number of Participants Hospitalized for Non-cardiac Reasons

hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the inpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Handheld Ultrasound6
Clinical Assessment Only18

Number of Participants in Each New York Heart Association Class

"New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.~Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity.~Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100m). Comfortable only at rest.~Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients." (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionvisits (Number)
NYHA Class INYHA Class IINYHA Class IIINYHA Class IV
Clinical Assessment Only118392
Handheld Ultrasound09220

Reviews

2 reviews available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden

ArticleYear
[CHARM].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2006, Volume: 64 Suppl 6

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive

2006
[ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonists?].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1999, Sep-24, Volume: 124 Suppl 2

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme In

1999

Trials

3 trials available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden

ArticleYear
Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in
    European heart journal, 2009, Volume: 30, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidaz

2009
Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease.
    American heart journal, 2003, Volume: 146, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronar

2003
Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
    Circulation, 2004, Oct-12, Volume: 110, Issue:15

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Canada; Cardiovas

2004

Other Studies

4 other studies available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden

ArticleYear
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
    Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2021, Volume: 110, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death

2021
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
    JACC. Heart failure, 2019, Volume: 7, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2019
The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl

2008
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
    Circulation, 2007, Sep-25, Volume: 116, Issue:13

    Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2007