candesartan has been researched along with Cardiac Arrest, Sudden in 9 studies
candesartan: a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist
candesartan : A benzimidazolecarboxylic acid that is 1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid substituted by an ethoxy group at position 2 and a ({2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl}methyl) group at position 1. It is a angiotensin receptor antagonist used for the treatment of hypertension.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)." | 9.14 | Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009) |
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction." | 9.11 | Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004) |
" In this sub-analysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial, we aimed to compare the effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension and to determine their optimal target blood pressures (BPs)." | 7.74 | The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial. ( Fujimoto, A; Fukiyama, K; Fukui, T; Matsuoka, H; Nakao, K; Oba, K; Ogihara, T; Saruta, T; Shimamoto, K; Ueshima, K, 2008) |
"Angiographically documented CAD patients with hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan-based (n= 1024) or non-ARB-based pharmacotherapy including angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (n = 1025)." | 5.14 | Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in ( Hagiwara, N; Haze, K; Honda, T; Hosoda, S; Kasanuki, H; Nagashima, M; Ogawa, H; Origasa, H; Sumiyoshi, T; Urashima, M; Yamaguchi, J, 2009) |
"Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction." | 5.11 | Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. ( Finn, P; Granger, CB; McMurray, JJ; Michelson, EL; Pfeffer, MA; Pocock, S; Skali, H; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wang, D; Yusuf, S; Zornoff, L, 2004) |
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i." | 3.91 | Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019) |
" In this sub-analysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial, we aimed to compare the effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension and to determine their optimal target blood pressures (BPs)." | 3.74 | The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial. ( Fujimoto, A; Fukiyama, K; Fukui, T; Matsuoka, H; Nakao, K; Oba, K; Ogihara, T; Saruta, T; Shimamoto, K; Ueshima, K, 2008) |
"Candesartan treatment reduced primary end point risk (5." | 2.71 | Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. ( Kondo, J; Kono, T; Kosaka, T; Matsui, H; Morishima, I; Mukawa, H; Murohara, T; Numaguchi, Y; Okumura, K; Sone, T; Tsuboi, H; Uesugi, M; Yoshida, T, 2003) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (11.11) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 6 (66.67) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 1 (11.11) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (11.11) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Shen, L | 2 |
Jhund, PS | 2 |
Anand, IS | 2 |
Carson, PE | 2 |
Desai, AS | 2 |
Granger, CB | 4 |
Køber, L | 1 |
Komajda, M | 2 |
McKelvie, RS | 2 |
Pfeffer, MA | 4 |
Solomon, SD | 4 |
Swedberg, K | 4 |
Zile, MR | 2 |
McMurray, JJV | 2 |
Docherty, KF | 1 |
Petrie, MC | 1 |
Ogihara, T | 1 |
Nakao, K | 1 |
Fukui, T | 1 |
Fukiyama, K | 1 |
Fujimoto, A | 1 |
Ueshima, K | 1 |
Oba, K | 1 |
Shimamoto, K | 1 |
Matsuoka, H | 1 |
Saruta, T | 1 |
Kasanuki, H | 1 |
Hagiwara, N | 1 |
Hosoda, S | 1 |
Sumiyoshi, T | 1 |
Honda, T | 1 |
Haze, K | 1 |
Nagashima, M | 1 |
Yamaguchi, J | 1 |
Origasa, H | 1 |
Urashima, M | 1 |
Ogawa, H | 1 |
Kondo, J | 1 |
Sone, T | 1 |
Tsuboi, H | 1 |
Mukawa, H | 1 |
Morishima, I | 1 |
Uesugi, M | 1 |
Kono, T | 1 |
Kosaka, T | 1 |
Yoshida, T | 1 |
Numaguchi, Y | 1 |
Matsui, H | 1 |
Murohara, T | 1 |
Okumura, K | 1 |
Wang, D | 1 |
Finn, P | 1 |
Skali, H | 2 |
Zornoff, L | 1 |
McMurray, JJ | 2 |
Yusuf, S | 2 |
Michelson, EL | 2 |
Pocock, S | 2 |
Momomura, S | 1 |
Dobson, J | 1 |
Young, JB | 1 |
Riegger, GA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634712] | Phase 3 | 734 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 1999-06-30 | Completed | ||
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238] | Phase 3 | 4,128 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-06-30 | Completed | ||
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302] | Phase 3 | 3,445 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-08-31 | Completed | ||
Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) Trial of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients[NCT00125463] | Phase 3 | 3,200 participants | Interventional | 2001-09-30 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Patients With Hypertension After Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Implantation[NCT00139386] | Phase 4 | 1,119 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-10-31 | Completed | ||
Phase 2/3 Study of Effect of AT1RB Versus ACE Inhibitor in Addition to XO Inhibitor on Progression of LV Remodeling and Dysfunction in Diabetic Patients With Acute MI.[NCT01052272] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 72 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-07-31 | Completed | ||
Gender Specific Registry in Subjects Hospitalized With Heart Failure in Santiago( GENESIS Registry): Pilot Heart Failure Registry Looking for Sex Analysis[NCT05960968] | 500 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2023-08-11 | Recruiting | |||
A Randomized Study of Pocket Ultrasound Derived IVC Diameter for Guided Management of Heart Failure[NCT01962688] | 37 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-31 | Terminated (stopped due to low enrollment) | |||
A Randomized Study of the MitraClip Device in Heart Failure Patients With Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation[NCT01772108] | 42 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Terminated (stopped due to As recruitment rate was lower than anticipated) | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | pg/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo - Month 6 | 0.98 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 0.93 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 1.00 |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 1.01 |
NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 10 - Improved | Month 10 - Unchanged | Month 10 - Worsened | Month 10 - Major Event | Month 10 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined | 936 | 966 | 48 | 10 | 107 | 948 | 911 | 58 | 41 | 109 | 933 | 866 | 61 | 75 | 132 | 928 | 658 | 97 | 324 | 60 |
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II | 55 | 310 | 41 | 2 | 18 | 44 | 294 | 53 | 10 | 25 | 38 | 287 | 50 | 22 | 29 | 42 | 230 | 68 | 75 | 11 |
Irbesartan Class III or IV | 881 | 656 | 7 | 8 | 89 | 904 | 617 | 5 | 31 | 84 | 895 | 579 | 11 | 53 | 103 | 886 | 428 | 29 | 249 | 49 |
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined | 881 | 1016 | 51 | 14 | 98 | 902 | 939 | 71 | 42 | 106 | 902 | 890 | 69 | 80 | 119 | 882 | 694 | 107 | 320 | 57 |
Placebo Baseline Class I or II | 47 | 338 | 47 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 317 | 63 | 9 | 14 | 39 | 312 | 62 | 16 | 16 | 42 | 254 | 78 | 66 | 5 |
Placebo Class III or IV | 834 | 678 | 4 | 12 | 87 | 860 | 622 | 8 | 33 | 92 | 863 | 578 | 7 | 64 | 103 | 840 | 440 | 29 | 254 | 52 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 18 | 73.49 | 68.00 | -5.50 |
Irbesartan - Month 30 | 74.37 | 67.05 | -7.12 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 73.13 | 69.21 | -3.91 |
Placebo - Month 18 | 73.58 | 70.88 | -2.69 |
Placebo - Month 30 | 73.34 | 69.51 | -4.02 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 73.02 | 71.97 | -1.07 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 42 | 74.95 | 67.48 | -7.36 |
Irbesartan - Month 54 | 75.17 | 68.24 | -6.93 |
Irbesartan - Month 66 | 71.84 | 64.85 | -5.46 |
Placebo - Month 42 | 74.37 | 71.34 | -3.14 |
Placebo - Month 54 | 75.29 | 72.65 | -2.63 |
Placebo - Month 66 | 63.47 | 60.09 | -4.91 |
Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Final Visit Mean | |
Irbesartan - Final Visit | 38.9 | 38.3 |
Placebo - Final Visit | 42.5 | 42.6 |
Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean Score | Mean Score at Timepoint | Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline | |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 42.8 | 32.1 | -10.6 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 43.0 | 33.2 | -9.8 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 42.7 | 31.6 | -11.2 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 42.7 | 32.9 | -10.0 |
Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG | Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation | |
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use | 366 | 35 |
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use | 1089 | 103 |
Placebo + ACE-I Use | 344 | 29 |
Placebo no ACE-I Use | 1102 | 99 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 255 | 549 | 512 | 508 | 83 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 121 | 247 | 519 | 460 | 476 | 103 | 28 | 13 | 68 | 153 | 213 | 382 | 328 | 460 | 114 | 64 | 35 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 276 | 536 | 501 | 510 | 83 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 116 | 232 | 531 | 430 | 509 | 90 | 39 | 10 | 74 | 146 | 212 | 339 | 335 | 461 | 145 | 75 | 32 | 384 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 193 | 523 | 504 | 579 | 97 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 122 | 195 | 513 | 439 | 525 | 115 | 48 | 11 | 68 | 153 | 157 | 361 | 319 | 479 | 166 | 80 | 34 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 200 | 519 | 471 | 596 | 101 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 116 | 182 | 489 | 443 | 559 | 109 | 43 | 16 | 74 | 146 | 178 | 300 | 337 | 477 | 176 | 90 | 42 | 383 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Event - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 235 | 552 | 529 | 537 | 63 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 122 | 234 | 532 | 461 | 503 | 78 | 30 | 8 | 68 | 153 | 207 | 378 | 332 | 480 | 121 | 52 | 25 | 396 | 76 |
Placebo | 230 | 563 | 519 | 529 | 69 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 116 | 206 | 534 | 450 | 527 | 82 | 35 | 7 | 74 | 146 | 201 | 339 | 352 | 495 | 109 | 76 | 28 | 383 | 78 |
Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 4.1 | 8.1 | 12.8 | 17.9 | 25.0 |
Placebo | 3.8 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 18.5 | 23.6 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage 1 Year | Percentage 2 Years | Percentage 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 3.3 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 13.0 | 18.0 |
Placebo | 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 13.1 | 17.1 |
Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 11.6 | 19.2 | 24.2 | 30.0 | 35.0 |
Placebo | 11.4 | 20.0 | 25.8 | 30.9 | 35.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 5.2 | 8.7 | 12.9 | 17.2 | 23.0 |
Placebo | 4.2 | 9.3 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 22.4 |
Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 7.9 | 12.9 | 15.7 | 19.8 | 23.6 |
Placebo | 8.2 | 13.7 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 23.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 9.7 | 16.3 | 20.5 | 24.8 | 28.5 |
Placebo | 9.8 | 17.1 | 21.7 | 25.9 | 29.0 |
Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 12.3 | 20.7 | 26.4 | 32.9 | 39.2 |
Placebo | 12.1 | 21.3 | 28.4 | 34.2 | 39.5 |
Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 0.7 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 5.2 |
Placebo | 1.2 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 6.2 |
This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 230 | 562 | 533 | 528 | 60 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 129 | 214 | 546 | 442 | 507 | 72 | 21 | 5 | 75 | 185 | 180 | 430 | 344 | 477 | 117 | 41 | 23 | 364 | 91 |
Placebo | 198 | 575 | 529 | 541 | 58 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 132 | 195 | 537 | 435 | 548 | 73 | 19 | 6 | 79 | 169 | 186 | 367 | 361 | 504 | 117 | 56 | 28 | 350 | 92 |
First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.09 |
Spironolactone | 0.05 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 4.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.1 |
Spironolactone | 2.8 |
Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.2 |
Spironolactone | 5.5 |
Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 102.33 |
Spironolactone | 102.26 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.8 |
Spironolactone | 7.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.9 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 5.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.1 |
First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.2 |
Spironolactone | 3.2 |
First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.4 |
Spironolactone | 1.4 |
Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 67.50 |
Spironolactone | 65.20 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 20.0 |
Spironolactone | 18.8 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 3.8 |
First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.7 |
Spironolactone | 0.7 |
Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.32 |
Spironolactone | 4.49 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.2 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 65.9 |
Spironolactone | 66.4 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 63.1 |
Spironolactone | 64.4 |
Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.11 |
Spironolactone | 1.17 |
Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 140.95 |
Spironolactone | 140.33 |
First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 8.3 |
Spironolactone | 6.8 |
LVEF is a calculation of heart pump function determined from the volume after complete filling minus the volume after complete contraction divided by the volume after complete filling. A value of 55% or greater is normal. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 56.36 | 56.82 | 42.62 | 52.37 | 39.88 | 56.33 | NA | 51.70 | 54.17 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 52.68 | 57.28 | NA | 56.11 | 54.46 | 57.82 | 56.17 | 55.79 | 54.40 |
Ramipril | 52.19 | 54.20 | 64.98 | 52.76 | 52.13 | 55.02 | 51.27 | 57.18 | 50.73 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 53.37 | 52.80 | NA | 51.74 | 34.89 | 54.05 | NA | 55.59 | NA |
LVEDV/BSA: As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The relation of heart blood volume to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 78.06 | 78.60 | 93.57 | 85.44 | 90.20 | 82.74 | NA | 84.28 | 76.65 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 79.03 | 78.01 | NA | 79.75 | 63.1 | 84.95 | 75.27 | 79.72 | 75.05 |
Ramipril | 73.03 | 74.10 | 73.23 | 75.34 | 81.19 | 75.28 | 71.99 | 70.46 | 48.68 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 78.52 | 86.13 | NA | 83.95 | 108.25 | 67.96 | NA | 71.63 | NA |
LVESV/BSA: The end systolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of contraction and is an index of the pump function of the heart. This relation to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 35.26 | 35.26 | 53.87 | 42.27 | 54.04 | 37.76 | NA | 41.72 | 35.13 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 39.49 | 34.15 | NA | 36.07 | 28.74 | 37.18 | 32.99 | 35.99 | 34.22 |
Ramipril | 36.20 | 34.77 | 25.64 | 36.82 | 39.42 | 35.30 | 35.23 | 31.17 | 23.98 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 37.91 | 42.88 | NA | 42.34 | 70.48 | 30.39 | NA | 31.56 | NA |
LVED Mass/LVEDV: As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart blood volume, the mass indexed to end diastolic volume determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a three-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | g/ml (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.79 | NA | 0.80 | 0.64 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 0.87 | 0.82 | NA | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
Ramipril | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.93 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 0.86 | 0.71 | NA | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.83 | NA | 0.80 | NA |
LVED Radius/Wall thickness As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart volume chamber diameter, the end-diastolic radius indexed to end diastolic wall thickness determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a two-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. This is a measure of LV Geometry. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | unitless (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 3.14 | 3.39 | 4.14 | 3.68 | 4.10 | 3.71 | NA | 3.58 | 4.04 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 3.45 | 3.63 | NA | 3.42 | 3.90 | 3.56 | 4.24 | 3.56 | 4.29 |
Ramipril | 3.23 | 3.32 | 3.42 | 3.43 | 3.44 | 3.60 | 2.92 | 3.46 | 3.12 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 3.57 | 4.04 | NA | 4.01 | 4.57 | 3.60 | NA | 3.61 | NA |
By identifying three points in three different planes in the heart muscle, the maximum shortening is the average of the difference between the distance between these three points at the end of filling of the heart and the end of contraction divided by the length at the end of filling times 100. The maximum shortening is a three dimensional analysis. The higher values indicate a healthy heart. This is a measure of LV Systolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent of length at end of filling (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,17,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,10,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=11,11,10,10) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,7,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 16.68 | 17.50 | 19.08 | 17.13 | 16.28 | 17.55 | NA | 16.62 | 20.38 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 16.00 | 18.50 | NA | 18.51 | 16.36 | 17.52 | 17.89 | 17.85 | 16.59 |
Ramipril | 15.81 | 16.88 | 18.43 | 14.57 | 17.06 | 17.26 | 16.68 | 15.67 | 13.70 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 15.84 | 18.72 | NA | 17.96 | 14.22 | 17.46 | NA | 17.52 | NA |
The Peak Early Filling Rate Normalized to EDV is calculated from the slope of the volume during the early filling of the heart with respect to time. The higher values indicate a very healthy heart muscle and lower values are indicative of a very stiff muscle. This is a measure of LV Diastolic Function. Since some visits did not occur at the scheduled 6 month intervals, the results have been divided into 3-month visit intervals for reporting purposes. (NCT01052272)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | 1/sec (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=17,17,18,18) | Month 6(n=14,11,11,12) | Month 9(n=1,2,0,0) | Month 12(n=12,11,11,11) | Month 15(n=3,2,1,1) | Month 18(n=10,12,8,8) | Month 21(n=3,0,0,1) | Month 24 (n=11,9,8,10) | Month 27 (n=1,1,0,1) | |
Candesartan Cilexetil | 2.01 | 2.02 | 1.13 | 1.90 | 1.48 | 1.93 | NA | 1.65 | 1.10 |
Candesartan Cilexetil and Allopurinol | 2.0 | 1.98 | NA | 1.77 | 2.28 | 2.05 | 2.50 | 1.82 | 2.15 |
Ramipril | 1.93 | 1.74 | 2.50 | 1.80 | 2.02 | 1.91 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 1.34 |
Ramipril and Allopurinol | 2.11 | 2.03 | NA | 1.93 | 1.56 | 1.89 | NA | 1.88 | NA |
hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the outpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Handheld Ultrasound | 4 |
Clinical Assessment Only | 5 |
hospitalization information will be recorded throughout the length of the study for the inpatient arms (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: up to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Handheld Ultrasound | 6 |
Clinical Assessment Only | 18 |
"New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.~Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity.~Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100m). Comfortable only at rest.~Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients." (NCT01962688)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | visits (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
NYHA Class I | NYHA Class II | NYHA Class III | NYHA Class IV | |
Clinical Assessment Only | 1 | 18 | 39 | 2 |
Handheld Ultrasound | 0 | 9 | 22 | 0 |
2 reviews available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden
Article | Year |
---|---|
[CHARM].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2006 |
[ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonists?].
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme In | 1999 |
3 trials available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden
4 other studies available for candesartan and Cardiac Arrest, Sudden
Article | Year |
---|---|
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2019 |
The optimal target blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment in Japanese elderly patients with high-risk hypertension: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2008 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |
Influence of nonfatal hospitalization for heart failure on subsequent mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny | 2007 |