cabozantinib and Kidney-Neoplasms

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), either alone or in combination, confers a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for metastatic RCC in the first-line setting. However, guidance for optimal treatment selection in elderly patients remains limited.. A database search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line regimens for patients with advanced RCC older than 65 years old. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Indirect comparisons of available regimens were estimated using a random-effects network meta-analysis.. A total of 14 and five RCTs were eligible for PFS and OS analyses. Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) were associated with improved OS. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, and cabozantinib alone each showed improved PFS over sunitinib. Among these, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed better PFS than pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), but no PFS difference compared to nivolumab plus cabozantinib (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.03) and cabozantinib alone (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77). Network ranking showed pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib provided the favored OS and PFS benefit for elderly patients.. The combination of ICB with TKI such as pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib needs to be considered over monotherapy in the elderly population, but further validation using real-world data or prospective trials is necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for the geriatric population with advanced RCC.

Topics: Aged; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Nivolumab; Sunitinib

The first-in-class, small molecule HIF-2α inhibitor, belzutifan, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity in previously treated patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). HIF-2α also regulates VEGF expression and is involved in resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. This study describes the rationale and design for a randomized, phase III study evaluating efficacy and safety of belzutifan plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lenvatinib versus the TKI cabozantinib in patients with advanced RCC progressing after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in the first- or second-line setting or as adjuvant therapy. Considering the unmet need for effective and tolerable treatment of advanced RCC following immune checkpoint inhibitors, belzutifan plus lenvatinib may have a positive benefit/risk profile.

Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Topics: Adult; Axitinib; B7-H1 Antigen; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sunitinib

The purpose of this review is to highlight the most recent changes in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, a complicated and ever-changing field of research.. A recent meta-analysis examining combination therapy favors nivolumab plus cabozantinib as the overall survival leader in doublet therapy. Initial results on the first ever trial of triplet therapy have demonstrated improved progression-free survival over current standard of care. The hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor belzutifan is FDA approved for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and is currently being investigated in patients with nonhereditary renal cell carcinoma. The new glutamate synthesis inhibitor, telaglenastat, perhaps confers synergistic benefit when combined with everolimus, but combination with cabozantinib was not so effective. Dual mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with sapanisertib does not appear to be an effective therapeutic option. New biomarkers and targets are actively being investigated. Four recent trials examining alternative agents to pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting did not demonstrate an improvement in recurrence-free survival. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the combination therapy era is supported by retrospective data; clinical trials are recruiting patients.. The last year ushered in novel approaches of varying success for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma, including triplet therapy, HIF-2α inhibitors, metabolic pathway inhibitors, and dual mTOR inhibitors. Pembrolizumab remains the only modern therapy available in the adjuvant setting, and the waters surrounding cytoreductive nephrectomy are still murky.

Topics: Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies

Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have increased dramatically over the past decade. However, even when novel approaches have proven to be effective as monotherapy, many patients still develop progressive disease, and different strategies are needed to increase clinical response and quality of life. Strategies combining targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO) have emerged as a way to shorten the gap between responders and nonresponders to monotherapy and have reported promising results. In this review, we discuss the current role of cabozantinib in combination with IO agents in the treatment of metastatic RCC and UC and go over future directions in the field.. Lay abstract Treatment options for both advanced kidney and bladder cancers have increased significantly over the last decade. However, even when these new approaches have proven to be effective, many patients still experience disease progression. Therefore, different strategies are needed to increase the response to treatment and quality of life. Strategies combining therapies directed to reduce the tumor's blood supply (targeted therapies) and therapies that increase the ability of the body to recognize and attack tumor cells (immunotherapy) have emerged as a way to increase the effectiveness obtained when using these drugs on their own. In this review, we discuss the current role of cabozantinib, a targeted therapy, in combination with immune-based agents in the treatment of advanced kidney and bladder cancers and go over future directions in the field.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Kidney Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been successfully developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), further advancing treatment. While safety profiles are generally manageable with combination regimens, overlapping adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs can make treatment more complex. The CheckMate 9ER study evaluated the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in combination with the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody nivolumab in patients with previously untreated advanced RCC. Cabozantinib + nivolumab demonstrated superiority over sunitinib for progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. These outcomes supported the approval of cabozantinib + nivolumab as a first-line therapy for advanced RCC. The safety profile was manageable with prophylaxis, supportive care, dose holds and reductions for cabozantinib, and dose holds and immunosuppressive therapy for nivolumab. This review discusses the safety results of CheckMate 9ER and provides guidance on managing some of the more clinically relevant AEs with a focus on overlapping AEs, including diarrhea, elevated amylase/lipase, hepatotoxicity, dermatologic reactions, fatigue, endocrine disorders, and nephrotoxicity. We discuss AE management strategies (prophylaxis, supportive care, dose modification, and immunosuppressive therapy), and provide recommendations for identifying the causative agent of overlapping AEs and for consulting specialists about organ-specific immune-related AEs. Optimizing AE management can maintain tolerability and should be a priority with cabozantinib + nivolumab treatment.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diarrhea; Endocrine System Diseases; Exanthema; Fatigue; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Dual therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and either a programmed death protein/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-. Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a difficult-to-treat disease with a poor prognosis. The introduction of targeted therapy and, subsequently, treatments that boost or restore the patient’s natural immune response to cancer (immunotherapy), however, has led to improved outcomes. In particular, combination treatment with a targeted therapy drug and an immunotherapeutic agent has been shown to significantly improve overall survival compared to targeted therapy alone. Dual therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib (Cabometyx

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Sunitinib

We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for cabozantinib activity in patients with solid tumors after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy.. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021259873). MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 19 May 2021 to identify publications reporting the efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with solid tumors who had received prior CPI-based therapy. Publications were screened by one reviewer with uncertainties resolved by a second and/or the full author group. Risk of bias was assessed using Gradingof Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies.. Of 669 publications screened, 21 were eligible: 18 reported data on renal cell carcinoma, and one each for hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Of six trial publications, three reported moderate-quality evidence and three low-quality evidence. Of 15 observational studies, NOS scores ranged from 3 to 6, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. The studies consistently reported clinical activity for cabozantinib after CPI therapy, across treatment lines and tumor types, with no new safety signals. The findings were limited by the quality and quantity of available data.. Cabozantinib appears to have anti-tumor activity after prior CPI therapy in patients with solid tumors. Our results are driven largely by studies in renal cell carcinoma. Evidence from ongoing phase 3 trials is required to establish further the role of cabozantinib after CPI therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Pyridines; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the survival benefit and safety profile of current available second-line treatment options of metastatic renal cell carcinomav.. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically researched for eligible articles which were published before July 20, 2021. Studies comparing overall/progression free survival (OS/PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and/or adverse events (AEs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomav were included.. Nine trials (with 4911 patients) were finally included for final network meta-analysis. Cabozantinib, lenvatinib, and lenvatinib plus everolimus were associated with significantly better PFS, OS, and ORR compared with everolimus, and lenvatinib plus everolimus emerged as the best option. As for grade 3 to 4 AEs, nivolumab showed significantly lower risk of AEs compared with everolimus. Other included treatments were associated with significantly increased risk of AEs. When comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of included treatments based on the ranking analysis of PFS, ORR, and grade 3 to 4 AEs, lenvatinib plus everolimus, cabozantinib, and nivolumab showed superior efficacy over other treatments, with relatively lower risk of grade 3 to 4 AEs.. Among all included therapies, Lenvatinib plus everolimus was identified as the most effective treatment approach, with the best PFS, OS, and ORR. nivolumab was associated with decreased incidence of grade 3 to 4 AEs among included treatment therapies. When comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of included treatment options, lenvatinib plus everolimus, cabozantinb, and nivolumab were associated with better survival benefits and lower risk of AEs. Future studies should focus on the direct comparison of different second-line treatment in real-world populations.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines

To update the recommendations for the management of kidney cancers.. A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2015 to 2022. The most relevant articles on the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. Therefore, the recommendations were updated while specifying the level of evidence (high or low).. The gold standard for the diagnosis and evaluation of kidney cancer is contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are indicated in special cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where the results will influence the therapeutic decision. Renal tumours should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancer should be classified according to the IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for T1a tumours and can be performed by an open approach, by laparoscopy or by robot-guidance. Active surveillance of tumours less than 2cm in size can be considered regardless of the patient's age. Ablative therapies and active surveillance are options in elderly patients with comorbidity. T1b tumours should be treated by partial or radical nephrectomy depending on the complexity of the tumour. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced cancers. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab should be considered in patients at intermediate and high risk for recurrence after nephrectomy. In metastatic patients: Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to oligometastatic patients in combination with local treatment of metastases if this can be complete and delayed cytoreductive nephrectomy can be proposed for patients with a complete response or a significant partial response. Medical treatment should be proposed as first-line therapy for patients with a poor or intermediate prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed in case of single or oligo-metastases. The recommended first-line drugs for metastatic patients with clear cell renal carcinoma are the combinations axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipililumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Cabozantinib is the recommended first-line treatment for patients with metastatic papillary carcinoma. Cystic tumours should be classified according to the Bosniak classification. Surgical removal should be proposed as a priority for Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended that patient monitoring be adapted to the aggressiveness of the tumour.. These updated recommendations are a reference that will allow French and French-speaking practitioners to improve kidney cancer management.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a challenging oncologic disease to treat despite advancements in therapeutics. Nonetheless, the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy has drastically altered the treatment landscape for advanced RCC over the past decade. The current standard-of-care treatment for advanced RCC involves combination TKI and immunotherapy regimens including cabozantinib and nivolumab as studied in the CheckMate 9ER trial. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence that led to the CheckMate 9ER study, as well as pertinent study aspects such as treatment efficacy, adverse events and patient-related outcomes.. Kidney cancer that has spread to organs and other parts of the body outside of the kidney remains a challenging disease to treat. The treatment of advanced kidney cancer has changed over the past decade with the approval of oral therapies called tyrosine kinase inhibitors and more recently immunotherapy, which utilizes the immune system to treat cancer. A new combination therapy employing cabozantinib and nivolumab has been shown to help patients with advanced kidney cancer live longer and have improvements in quality of life. This new combination therapy is now commonly used to treat advanced kidney cancer.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is the most common type of kidney cancers. Disease-specific survival for mRCC has been significantly improved with the introduction of new targeted agents since 2005. However, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials comparing the efficacy between therapies. This study compared indirectly progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among first-line and second-line therapies in patients with mRCC using network meta-analysis (NMA).. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify phase II or phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of targeted and biological therapies in patients with mRCC published between January 2000 and June 2020. The Bayesian fixed-effect NMA was performed to evaluate relative PFS and OS of first-line and second-line therapies of axitinib, bevacizumab, cabozantinib, everolimus, lenvatinib, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, tivozanib, avelumab and pembrolizumab, which were approved by the Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency. End points were compared using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% credible interval (CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was estimated to assess the probability of being the best treatment.. A total of 26 RCTs (first line: 19, second line: 9) with 13 893 patients were included in the NMA. For the first-line therapy, cabozantinib was associated with the highest improved PFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CrI = 0.14-0.44) followed by avelumab + axitinib and pembrolizumab + axitinib (HR = 0.27, SUCRA = 90%). Pembrolizumab + axitinib had a high likelihood of being the preferred treatment when using OS as the outcome measure (HR = 0.41, 95% CrI = 0.16-0.85). Avelumab + axitinib had the lowest HR compared with placebo + interferon on discontinuations due to AE (HR = 1.04, 95% CrI = 0.54-1.86). For second-line therapy, cabozantinib was identified as the most effective treatment option when assessing PFS (HR = 0.17, 95% CrI = 0.12-0.24). Axitinib had the lowest HR of OS and discontinuation due to AE (HR = 0.54, 95% CrI = 0.40-0.71; HR = 0.98, 95% CrI = 0.42-1.97, respectively). Pazopanib was the second choice in terms of OS (HR = 0.56, 95% CrI = 0.28-1.00; SUCRA = 76%) compared with placebo.. With respect to PFS and OS improvement, cabozantinib, avelumab + axitinib and pembrolizumab + axitinib are likely to be the preferred options for the first-line therapy and cabozantinib and axitinib for the second-line therapy in the management of mRCC. Regarding safety, avelumab + axitinib and temsirolimus were considered preferred treatment options in first-line and second-line therapies. More future research is needed to establish subgroup analyses, allowing evaluation of the impact of some of the differences in patient characteristics, including treatment effect modifiers.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyridines

To estimate the cost-effectiveness and value of information of cabozantinib compared to nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, who previously failed treatment from a societal perspective in South Korea.. A partitioned survival model was used to evaluate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of cabozantinib versus nivolumab. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were obtained from a network meta-analysis that included METEOR and CheckMate 025 trial results. Utility values for health states and adverse events were estimated based on the EQ-5D-5L data of METEOR trial with a Korean-specific tariff. Costs were estimated by a micro-costing approach using healthcare claims data and expert consultation. The impact of uncertainties in the model were explored by scenario analyses, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was estimated to assess the value of future research to decrease decision uncertainty.. Compared to nivolumab, cabozantinib was associated with improved OS, PFS, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at greater cost. The ICUR was $34,445 per QALY. In sensitivity analysis, drug costs had the greatest influence on the ICUR. Cabozantinib had a 68.0% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of 2 times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. The population EVPI was $82.6 million at 2 GDP threshold.. Cabozantinib was found to be cost-effective for advanced RCC patients after failure of prior therapy at a 2 GDP threshold. Future research that costs less than the estimated population EVPI would be worth considering for a comparison of cabozantinib and nivolumab.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Republic of Korea

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Quality of Life

Altered receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling contributes to tumorigenesis and suppression of immune-mediated destruction of cancer cells. Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits several RTKs involved in tumorigenesis, and is approved for the treatment of patients with progressive metastatic medullary thyroid cancer, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma that has been previously treated with sorafenib.. We present an up-to-date evaluation of preclinical evidence for RTK inhibition with cabozantinib, specifically VEGFR, MET, KIT, RET, AXL, FLT3, and associated antitumor effects. Preclinical investigations of cabozantinib in combination with other anticancer drugs are also reviewed.. Preclinical evidence shows that cabozantinib has antitumor activity against various cancer cells and exhibits synergy with other anticancer agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and hormone receptor or metabolic pathway inhibitors. Further optimization of cabozantinib treatment requires the identification of biomarkers of response and resistance, and exploration of complementary drug targets. Investigation of mechanisms of adaptive resistance, such as epithelial to mesenchymal transition (cancer intrinsic) and immunomodulation by the tumor microenvironment (cancer extrinsic), as well as identification of novel drug targets based on characterization of cancer stem cell metabolomic phenotypes, appear to be promising approaches.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Tumor Microenvironment

This network meta-analysis aims to deliver an up-to-date, comprehensive efficacy and toxicity comparison of the approved first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in order to provide support for evidence-based treatment decisions. Previous NMAs of first-line mRCC treatments either predate the approval of all the first-line TKIs currently available or do not include evaluation of safety data for all treatments.. We performed a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of phase II/III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing approved first-line TKI therapies for mRCC. A random effects model with a frequentist approach was computed for progression-free survival (PFS) data and for the proportion of patients experiencing a maximum of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs).. The network meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated no significant differences between cabozantinib and either sunitinib (50 mg 4/2), pazopanib or tivozanib. The network meta-analysis indicated that in terms of grade 3 and 4 AEs, tivozanib had the most favourable safety profile and was associated with significantly less risk of toxicity than the other TKIs.. These network meta-analysis data demonstrate that cabozantinib, sunitinib, pazopanib and tivozanib do not significantly differ in their efficacy, but tivozanib is associated with a more favourable safety profile in terms of grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Consequently, the relative toxicity of these first-line TKIs may play a more significant role than efficacy comparisons in treatment decisions and in planning future RCTs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Network Meta-Analysis; Phenylurea Compounds; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Is it true that cabozantinib should be the preferred option treating patients with bone metastases? Are there any reliable comparisons between this drug and other standard options in this subgroup? To address the issue, we performed a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized trials with cabozantinib, to assess its effectiveness, in terms of overall survival, according to the presence of bone metastases. We included (a) randomized controlled trials; (b) any solid tumors and therapeutic line; and (c) overall survival data available according to the site of disease. Cabozantinib improved overall survival both for the group with bone metastases, with risk of death decreased by 53% (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.87; P=0.02) and for the group without bone metastases, decreasing the risk of death by 44% (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.79; P=0.001) over the standard of care. The difference was not significantly different between the two groups. Despite cabozantinib can be undoubtedly listed as a good therapeutic option for cancer patients with bone metastases, it seems that its preclinical profile against bone remodeling does not translate into an actual clinical relevance, preventing from considering the presence of bone metastases as principal criterion for the choice of this drug.

Topics: Anilides; Bone Neoplasms; Bone Remodeling; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

Anti-angiogenic treatment is an important option that has changed the therapeutic landscape in various tumors, particularly in patients affected by renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Agents that block signaling pathways governing tumor angiogenesis have raised high expectations among clinicians. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) comprise a heterogeneous class of drugs with distinct pharmacological profiles, including potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. Among them, tivozanib is one of the last TKIs introduced in the clinical practice; this drug selectively targets VEGFRs, it is characterized by a favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profile and has been approved as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). In this article, we describe the clinical pharmacology of selected VEGFR-TKIs used for the treatment of mRCC, highlighting the relevant differences; moreover we aim to define the main pharmacologic characteristics of these drug.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Patients diagnosed with non-clear renal cell carcinoma have often been excluded from clinical trials due to the shortage of treatments available, the low incidence of tumours with non-clear histology, and the corresponding diversity of intrinsic molecular features. This approach led to a knowledge gap in finding the optimal treatment for patients diagnosed with non-clear cell renal carcinoma. Cabozantinib, a potent multiple tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, has been recently investigated in patients with non-clear cell histologies of renal cell cancer. In this review, we have summarized available data on the use of cabozantinib in non-clear renal cell carcinoma.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a dose of 60 mg/day. As with other TKIs, cabozantinib is associated with high interpatient variability in drug clearance and exposure that can significantly impact safety and tolerability across a patient population. To optimize cabozantinib exposure (maintaining efficacy and tolerability) for the individual, patients may require treatment interruption with dose reduction (40 mg/day and then 20 mg/day). In the pivotal Phase 3 METEOR trial, cabozantinib significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival and the objective response rate compared with everolimus in patients with advanced RCC who had received previous treatment with a VEGFR TKI. Dose reductions were common for patients receiving cabozantinib (60%) but effective as only 9% discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). In this review, we discuss pharmacometric analyses that evaluated the impact of cabozantinib dose on efficacy and safety outcomes during the METEOR study. Exposure-response models demonstrate that the risk of experiencing adverse events and dose reduction is increased in patients with low cabozantinib clearance versus typical clearance and decreased in patients with high clearance. Dose reduction of cabozantinib to manage AEs is predicted to have minimal impact on efficacy as AEs are more likely to occur in patients with low clearance and higher exposure to cabozantinib. These analyses further support a dose modification strategy to optimize cabozantinib exposure for individual patients.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Models, Statistical; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Nephrectomy is the reference-standard treatment for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). For patients with unresectable disease, tumor may be shrunk by using chemotherapy, thereby permitting surgical resection, which can be curative. We provided neoadjuvant cabozantinib, the preferred tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced RCC of poor and intermediate risk, to two patients with initially unresectable RCCs. In both patients, this led to tumor shrinkage of > 50% after 4 months of therapy, which permitted surgical resection. Both tumor specimens also showed strong pathologic tumor response. The robust responses observed with cabozantinib, even at reduced doses, suggest it to be an effective neoadjuvant option in RCC. Our novel experience with neoadjuvant cabozantinib, combined with our review of the use of cabozantinib in RCC, indicates that providing preoperative cabozantinib to facilitate potentially curative surgical resection has good results and should be further explored.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pyridines

Most contemporary metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients receive first-line immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination or immunotherapy-immunotherapy combination, as first-line standards of care. However, second-line therapy choices are less well established. To address this void, we examined existing evidence supporting second and subsequent-line treatment options after immunotherapy-based combination therapy.. Evidence regarding efficacy of second-line therapy after immunotherapy-based combination is mainly retrospective, except for axitinib, which is the only TKI with prospective efficacy data in this setting. Cabozantinib demonstrated excellent second-line progression-free survival (PFS) that remained in third or later line use, albeit based on small numbers of observations. Moreover, pazopanib demonstrated excellent PFS, but showed wider variability in PFS rates. Sunitinib's PFS rates appeared lower than for axitinib, cabozantinib or pazopanib. Finally, inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway appeared to offer even lower efficacy than any TKI after immunotherapy-based therapy combinations.. All available contemporary evidence about TKI efficacy after immunotherapy-based therapy combinations is based on institutional studies. No major differences in efficacy for the examined TKIs after immunotherapy-based combination therapies were recorded. In general, these showed similar efficacy to their efficacy data recorded in first-line.

Topics: Anilides; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

A 70-year-old man presented with gradually worsening throat discomfort. He had no prior diagnosis of cancer and no travel history of note. Examination revealed a right-sided painless neck lump. He underwent an MRI of the neck, revealing a gadolinium-enhancing tonsillar mass and two brain lesions. Biopsy of the tonsil lesion was in keeping with an epithelial neoplasm, suggesting metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This was confirmed following a staging CT, which revealed a left renal mass and lung metastases. Due to his brain metastases, the patient has been started on the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib. A brief discussion on the diagnostic evaluation of a tonsil mass as a rare presentation of renal cell cancer follows this report.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Palatine Tonsil; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

More than half of patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are age 65 or older. However, older patients are often unable to meet eligibility criteria for clinical trial enrollment due to multiple factors, such as comorbidities and polypharmacy, which leads to under-representation of this population in clinical trials. Given this, efficacy data from the registration trials may not apply to older patients. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of first-line and salvage-line treatment in older patients, and compare efficacy between older and younger patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC).. Pivotal phase three clinical trials for first-line and salvage-line treatments were included if they reported overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) results stratified by age (

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Salvage Therapy

Nivolumab and cabozantinib, two new treatment options for previously-treated advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), have recently been approved.. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Indirect treatment comparisons were carried out by directly assessing HR differences and statistical modeling of Kaplan-Meier curves from these two trials.. Publications identified showed that no head-to-head comparisons had been carried out. Two indirect treatment comparisons used agreed that there was no significant difference in OS between cabozantinib and nivolumab and that cabozantinib significantly improved PFS compared to nivolumab.. The field of aRCC treatments is evolving rapidly, creating opportunities for individualized treatments and challenges for clinicians to keep up with the evidence. In lieu of availability of direct comparisons of all options, advanced modeling results presented herein can help to inform and improve personalized treatments.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Von Hippel-Lindau (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anilides; Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kinase; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome; Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein

Cabozantinib was recently approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor targeting VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 2, mesenchymal-epithelial transition receptor, and "anexelekto" receptor tyrosine kinase. A 60-mg daily dose led to improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus everolimus in advanced RCC patients as a second- or later-line treatment in the METEOR trial. Improved PFS with cabozantinib versus sunitinib has also been demonstrated in the first-line setting in CABOSUN. However, cabozantinib, like other VEGFR inhibitors, is associated with toxicity that may affect the patient's quality of life. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) are diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, weight loss, nausea, and stomatitis. This article summarizes the safety profile of cabozantinib in RCC patients and offers guidance for the management of these AEs. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of these AEs and, based on our experiences with cabozantinib and other multikinase inhibitors, we present approaches to manage toxicity. Prophylactic and therapeutic solutions are available to help with the management of toxicity associated with cabozantinib, and adequate interventions can ensure optimum adherence and maximize patient outcomes.. Cabozantinib leads to improved survival outcomes in renal cell carcinoma patients compared with everolimus. However, management of the adverse event profile is crucial to achieve optimum adherence and outcomes with the use of cabozantinib. This review aims to provide appropriate guidance that will minimize the impact of adverse events and help to maximize the utility of this agent in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Medication Adherence; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials as Topic; CTLA-4 Antigen; Humans; Indazoles; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Nivolumab; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mccRCC) has seen substantial progress over the last 20 years, with many regulatory approvals since 2006 culminating in a substantial increase to overall survival (OS). Six therapies are currently available for first-line use, with additional treatments currently being tested in this setting, some of which are expected to be approved soon based on new data from the CABOSUN and CheckMate-214 trials. Based on the available evidence, we strongly believe that vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI) therapy over mechanistic target or rapamycin (mTOR; formerly known as mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor therapy is the most effective first-line option regardless of risk category assignment. High-dose interleukin-2 (HDIL-2) therapy remains a reasonable treatment option in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and have minimal comorbid conditions. In the near future, these agents are likely to be surpassed by cabozantinib and by combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Independent review has recently confirmed superiority of first-line cabozantinib over sunitinib in a phase 2 trial of 157 patients with intermediate or poor risk mccRCC (progression-free survival [PFS] 8.6 vs 5.3 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, p = 0.0008). In a separate study of 1096 patients treated with either upfront sunitinib or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, those with intermediate and poor risk had significant improvement in both PFS (11.6 vs 8.4 months, HR 0.82, p = 0.0331) and OS (not reached vs 26 months, p < 0.0001). Responses were greater in patients with positive programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor staining, and pending regulatory approval may become standard of care in untreated patients with intermediate to poor risk disease with positive PD-L1 status. This likely represents the beginning of additional novel immunotherapy combinations for the first-line treatment of mccRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sunitinib; Survival Rate; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Several therapies have recently been approved for use in the NHS for pretreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (amRCC), but there is a lack of comparative evidence to guide decisions between them.. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of axitinib (Inlyta. A systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were objective response rates (ORRs), adverse events (AEs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January and June 2016 for RCTs and non-RCTs, respectively. Two reviewers abstracted data and performed critical appraisals.. A fixed-effects MTC was conducted for OS, PFS [hazard ratios (HRs)] and ORR (odds ratios), and all were presented with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The RCT data formed the primary analyses, with non-RCTs and studies rated as being at a high risk of bias included in sensitivity analyses (SAs). HRQoL and AE data were summarised narratively. A partitioned survival model with health states for pre progression, post progression and death was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis. Survival curves were fitted to the PFS and OS results from the MTC. A systematic review of HRQoL was undertaken to identify sources of health state utility values.. Four RCTs (. Treatment comparisons were limited by the small number of RCTs. However, the key limitation of the analysis is the absence of the drug prices paid by the NHS, which was a limitation that could not be avoided owing to the confidentiality of discounts given to the NHS.. The RCT evidence suggests that cabozantinib is likely to be the most effective for PFS and OS, closely followed by nivolumab. All treatments appear to delay disease progression and prolong survival compared with BSC, although the results are heterogeneous. The economic analysis shows that at list price everolimus could be recommended as the other drugs are much more expensive with insufficient incremental benefit. The applicability of these findings to the NHS is somewhat limited because existing confidential patient access schemes could not be used in the analysis. Future work using the discounted prices at which these drugs are provided to the NHS would better inform estimates of their relative cost-effectiveness.. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042384.. The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Models, Econometric; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sunitinib; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

In the last decade, there has been a proliferation of treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, direct comparative data are lacking for most of these agents.. To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in the first-line treatment of mRCC.. Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched using the OvidSP platform for studies indexed from database inception to October 23, 2017. Abstracts of conferences of relevant medical societies were included, and the systematic search was supplemented by hand search. For the systematic review, we identified any parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing first-line systemic therapy. For network meta-analysis, we limited these to a clinically-relevant network based on standard practice patterns. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) were secondary outcomes.. In total, 37 trials reporting on 13 128 patients were included in the systematic review. The network meta-analysis comprised 10 trials reporting on 4819 patients. For PFS (10 trials, 4819 patients), there was a high likelihood (SUCRA 91%) that cabozantinib was the preferred treatment. For OS (5 trials, 3379 patients), there was a 48% chance that nivolumab plus ipilimumab was the preferred option. There was a 67% likelihood that nivolumab plus ipilimumab was the best tolerated regime with respect to AEs.. Cabozantinib and nivolumab plus ipilimumab are likely to be the preferred first-line agents for treating mRCC; however, direct comparative studies are warranted. These findings may provide guidance to patients and clinicians when making treatment decisions and may help inform future direct comparative trials.. There are many treatment options for patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We indirectly compared the available options and found that cabozantinib and nivolumab plus ipilimumab are likely to be preferable choices as the first-line treatment in this situation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

HOW TO CHOOSE THE APPROPRIATE SECOND-LINE TREATMENT?: The treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) has dramatically improved in the past ten years. In the second-line setting, for patients who progressed on prior antiangiogenic therapy (mainly the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) sunitinib or pazopanib), axitinib and everolimus have been recommended. Since 2015, other drugs have proven their efficacy and are currently considered the standard of care: cabozantinib (TKI that targets VEGFR, MET and AXL) and nivolumab (first anti-PD-1 check point inhibitor). Lenvatinib has also demonstrated promising results in association with everolimus, but this combination is not available in France. The optimal treatment choice for a given patient is challenging for the clinician when facing multiple options. In this article, we review the efficacy, safety and quality of life results of the main pivotal clinical studies involving advanced or metastatic RCC in the second-line setting, to help clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment. Beyond that, it is important to define all the sequencing strategy for patients to successively receive all the drugs that have demonstrated an increase in overall survival.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Everolimus; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Bone metastases (BMs) are common and cause morbidity in cancer patients. One third of metastatic renal cancer (mRCC) patients present metastatic disease to the bone. BMs cause severe complications such as fracture, spinal cord compression and pain requiring surgery or radiotherapy. Hypercalcaemia is a common feature in mRCC as well as an established poor prognosis factor. BMs impact negatively on prognosis and affect quality of life. Correct management of BMs from RCC requires a multimodal evaluation to optimize care and quality of life. In this review, we discuss current evidences on the role of systemic treatments in BMs management, bone-targeting agents benefits in skeletal-related events prevention and local therapeutic approaches to BM in mRCC. Define prognosis of systemic disease and identify the main goal of treatment are crucial for the selection of the best strategy.

Topics: Analgesics; Anilides; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Denosumab; Diphosphonates; Humans; Hypercalcemia; Immunotherapy; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quality of Life

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults and is known to be the 10th most common type of cancer in the world. Most of the currently available RCC drugs are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, combination therapies of TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are the focus of most of the final stage clinical trials. Meanwhile, other small molecule therapies for RCC that target indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1), glutaminase, C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), and transglutaminase 2 (TG2) are emerging as the next generation of therapeutics. In this review, these three major streams for the development of small molecule drugs for RCC are described.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Discovery; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Small Molecule Libraries

Cabozantinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that initially showed activity in medullary thyroid cancer and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after progression on first line therapy. Areas covered: In the METEOR trial, cabozantinib demonstrated significantly improved efficacy in all three endpoints; response rates, progression free survival and overall survival in a randomized trial with everolimus as an active comparator. Cabozantinib also showed activity in the front line setting in RCC within the CABOSUN trial. The study randomized untreated metastatic RCC patients to either cabozantinib or sunitinib and the former showed improved progression free survival which was the primary endpoint. The future holds promise for indications in other malignancies, given the preliminary efficacy and unique mechanism of action of cabozantinib. In this review we address the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib, and also review the development pathway of this agent in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. The potential benefit in specific patient populations, such as poor risk patients and bone metastases subgroups is also discussed. Expert commentary: The clinical applications of cabozantinib will be addressed within the context of the current competitive therapeutic landscape of RCC.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate

In the last several years, many new drugs have been approved to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cabozantinib is a novel multikinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase receptor Ret and other kinases that recently joined this impressive list of approved agents. Cabozantinib is an active agent in the preclinical and clinical setting, having recently demonstrated superiority over everolimus in a blinded, randomized phase III study of patients with progressive RCC after at least one prior line of antiangiogenic therapy. This agent's toxicity profile is similar to those of other multikinase inhibitors approved to treat RCC. This review will explore cabozantinib's pharmacologic and safety profile and its preclinical and clinical activity in RCC.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Interactions; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Relative effect of therapies indicated for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after failure of first line treatment is currently not known. The objective of the present study is to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of cabozantinib compared to everolimus, nivolumab, axitinib, sorafenib, and best supportive care (BSC) in aRCC patients who progressed after previous VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.. Systematic literature search identified 5 studies for inclusion in this analysis. The assessment of the proportional hazard (PH) assumption between the survival curves for different treatment arms in the identified studies showed that survival curves in two of the studies did not fulfil the PH assumption, making comparisons of constant hazard ratios (HRs) inappropriate. Consequently, a parametric survival network meta-analysis model was implemented with five families of functions being jointly fitted in a Bayesian framework to PFS, then OS, data on all treatments. The comparison relied on data digitized from the Kaplan-Meier curves of published studies, except for cabozantinib and its comparator everolimus where patient level data were available. This analysis applied a Bayesian fixed-effects network meta-analysis model to compare PFS and OS of cabozantinib versus its comparators. The log-normal fixed-effects model displayed the best fit of data for both PFS and OS, and showed that patients on cabozantinib had a higher probability of longer PFS and OS than patients exposed to comparators. The survival advantage of cabozantinib increased over time for OS. For PFS the survival advantage reached its maximum at the end of the first year's treatment and then decreased over time to zero.. With all five families of distributions, cabozantinib was superior to all its comparators with a higher probability of longer PFS and OS during the analyzed 3 years, except with the Gompertz model, where nivolumab was preferred after 24 months.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Niacinamide; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retreatment; Sorafenib; Treatment Outcome

Treatment in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved tremendously in the last decade. The development of newer targeted agents, like vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and immunotherapy have changed the treatment paradigm in mRCC patients. Axitinib and everolimus have been used extensively in patients who progressed on prior antiangiogenic therapy. The newer agents including nivolumab, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib in combination with everolimus have all demonstrated overall survival benefit over everolimus. However, with multiple treatment options, optimal choice and sequencing becomes challenging. This article provides an overview of different therapeutic options available as second-line treatment in patients with mRCC along with future directions.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Quinolines; Sorafenib

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Thyroid Neoplasms

While vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition are effective strategies in treating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most effective therapeutic approach for patients with non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) is unknown.. To systematically review relevant literature comparing the oncological outcomes and adverse events of different systemic therapies for patients with metastatic non-ccRCC.. Relevant databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 24, 2016. Only comparative studies were included. Risk of bias and confounding assessments were performed. A meta-analysis was planned for and only performed if methodologically appropriate; otherwise, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.. The literature search identified 812 potential titles and abstracts. Five randomized controlled trials, recruiting a total of 365 patients, were included. Three studies compared sunitinib against everolimus, one of which reported the results for non-ccRCC as a subgroup rather than as an entire randomized cohort. Individually, the studies showed a trend towards favoring sunitinib in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS; Everolimus versus Sunitinib in Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41, 80% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.92 and 1.41, 95% CI: 0.88-2.27, Evaluation in Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.67-2.01, Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9-2.8), but this trend did not reach statistical significance in any study. Meta-analysis was performed on two studies which solely recruited patients with non-ccRCC reporting on PFS, the results of which were inconclusive (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.91-1.86). Sunitinib was associated with more Grade 3-4 adverse events than everolimus, although this was not statistically significant.. This systematic review and meta-analysis represent a robust summary of the evidence base for systemic treatment of metastatic non-ccRCC. The results show a trend towards favoring vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for PFS and overall survival compared with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, although statistical significance was not reached. The relative benefits and harms of these treatments remain uncertain. Further research, either in the form of an individual patient data meta-analysis involving all relevant trials, or a randomized controlled trial with sufficient power to detect potential differences between treatments, is needed.. We examined the literature to determine the most effective treatments for advanced kidney cancer patients whose tumors are not of the clear cell subtype. The results suggest that a drug called sunitinib might be more effective than everolimus, but the statistics supporting this statement are not yet entirely reliable. Further research is required to clarify this unmet medical need.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzimidazoles; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Disease-Free Survival; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Everolimus; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferons; Interleukin-2; Kidney Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Pyrrolidinones; Quinolines; Quinolones; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Sequential treatment with targeted agents is the standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although first-line therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended for most patients, eventually all patients become resistant to them. Therefore, optimal selection of second-line therapy is crucial. Areas covered: We have reviewed the recent literature through pubmed search and recent congress presentations to briefly describe the clinical evidence for mTOR inhibition as a valid strategy in the treatment of mRCC after progression during anti-VEGFR therapy. In addition, we outline the management of adverse events associated with these agents, highlighting the importance of switching to an alternative mechanism of action to overcome resistance to TKI and to decrease cumulative toxicity associated with sequential treatments of the same type. Expert commentary: The choice of subsequent therapy after progression to first-line is not clear. Although the new drugs cabozantinib and nivolumab have shown to be superior that everolimus, still it is unknown which patients may benefit from these therapies in second-line, so treatment should be personalized to each patient and should consider approaches with different mechanisms of action.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Cabozantinib was approved by the FDA in April 2016 for the treatment of advanced renal cancer, pretreated with at least one prior antiangiogenic therapy. This is the first agent in the therapy of kidney cancer to show a statistically significant improvement in all three endpoints of clinical efficacy, response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival (OS), in a phase III randomized trial. The reporting of METEOR coincided with that of the Checkmate 025 study which randomized similarly eligible patients to receive nivolumab or everolimus 10 mg daily. As the drug development has occurred in parallel for cabozantinib and nivolumab, no evidence exists for decision making regarding optimal sequencing of these agents. A third option of lenvatinib and everolimus was also rapidly approved based on a phase II randomized trial demonstrating promising magnitude of improvement in response, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. The differences in toxicity profiles, duration and toxicities of prior therapy, presence of brain metastases, concomitant immunosuppressive therapies, or autoimmune conditions are the factors that are taken into account when choosing therapy. The patients who have demonstrated response, prolonged clinical benefit and tolerability, and with anti-VEGF therapy are likely to benefit from continued antiangiogenic activity combined with MET and HGF inhibition with cabozantinib at progression. The patients who have intolerance or poor response to anti-VEGF TKI should be switched to nivolumab as the preferential therapy of choice. Clearly, better predictors are required to aid in guiding therapeutic decisions. The CABOSUN trial will likely shift the entire paradigm. The CABOSUN trial demonstrated superior PFS and response rates favoring cabozantinib as compared to sunitinib in untreated, intermediate, or poor-risk RCC and can be predicted to become the front-line therapy of choice. Immune-based regimens such as the combinations of nivolumab + ipilimumab and bevacizumab + atezolizumab have completed phase III trials, comparing to sunitinib, and results are awaited. In the future, a similar clinical dilemma will be shifted to the front-line therapy and the nuances of trial eligibility, and patient comorbidities will remain important factors. Optimal sequencing and predictive biomarkers are the questions that need to be incorporated in future clinical trials within RCC.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Discovery; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retreatment; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

Second- and third-line treatments are more and more frequently administered to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients.. Here we discuss the various levels of evidence supporting presently available recommendations, trying to address a number of as yet unanswered issues, and also to take a glowing glance at the future. To do this, we interrogated the Medline database, as well as the proceedings of the main Oncological and Urological conferences for relevant studies.. Until recently, with regard to choosing the second line treatment after the failure of therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor receptors-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), the continued inhibition of the VEGF/VEGR pathway, or else the switch to an mTOR inhibitor, is recommended. These two options are characterized by partly different targets, completely different toxicity profiles, but a comparable efficacy. This scenario will change soon, after the publication of two randomized, controlled, phase III trials in which cabozantinib and nivolumab proved to be superior as compared to everolimus. As regards third line treatment, where a sequence of two VEGFR-TKIs has been used beforehand, the choice is represented by the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, whilst if a VEGFR-TKI followed by everolimus has been chosen, a return to VEGF pathway inhibition is suggested.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Not only has the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinomas (mRCC) changed the therapeutic options for this disease significantly, but with the occurrence of typical side effects this therapy also poses a challenge for the treating physician. Fatigue und hypothyroidism are two common side effects of TKI therapy that can often appear simultaneously. By reducing the patients' quality of life these side effects often lead to a discontinuation of therapy. With this review we want to give the treating physician an overview of the classification and the specific treatment of TKI-induced fatigue and hypothyroidism in order to maximize patients' compliance and the therapeutic efficacy of TKI therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fatigue; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Although two phase III trials support the recommendation of nephrectomy followed by interferon alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), this procedure cannot be applied to every patient with this condition. Systemic therapy has changed from interferon alpha to antiangiogenic-targeted therapy, and the clinical impact of nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy has not been proven. The SEER database shows that only 35% of patients with advanced RCC undergo nephrectomy as their initial treatment. Retrospective studies showed improved overall survival (OS) outcomes with nephrectomy and interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy; however, the inherent selection bias of younger and healthier patients receiving IL-2 likely accounts for this finding. Neoadjuvant therapy has demonstrated only modest efficacy in unresectable disease, and if remission is obtained with systemic therapy, it is unclear whether nephrectomy has any incremental benefit. In the absence of proven benefit of nephrectomy in the setting of targeted therapy, it seems advisable for patients with RCC with severely symptomatic disease, competing comorbidities, poor performance status, or unresectable disease to avoid nephrectomy and proceed directly to systemic therapy. The clinical implications of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic RCC are poorly understood, and patient cohorts that do not undergo this procedure are likely to be comprised of patients with unfavorable disease characteristics. Unfortunately, the completed trials of targeted therapy were 90% comprised of patients with prior nephrectomy (the majority of trials incorporate prior nephrectomy as an eligibility requirement) and hence may not reflect the outcomes of the majority of the patients with advanced RCC who have not undergone nephrectomy. Newer therapies such as nivolumab and cabozantinib have also been evaluated for a population in which 90% of the patients underwent nephrectomy. Future clinical trials and registry studies must focus on the therapeutic treatment and overall outcome of patients without nephrectomy and treated with contemporary systemic therapy.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Immunotherapy; Interleukin-2; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nephrectomy; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Survival Analysis

Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) affects over 330,000 new patients every year, of whom 1/3 present with metastatic RCC (mRCC) at diagnosis. Most mRCC patients treated with a first-line agent relapse within 1 year and need second-line therapy. The present study aims to compare overall survival (OS) between nivolumab and cabozantinib from two recent pivotal studies comparing, respectively, each one of the two emerging treatments against everolimus in patients who relapse following first-line treatment. Comparison is traditionally carried out using the Bucher method, which assumes proportional hazard. Since OS curves intersected in one of the pivotal studies, models not assuming proportional hazards were also considered to refine the comparison. Four Bayesian parametric survival network meta-analysis models were implemented on overall survival (OS) data digitized from the Kaplan-Meier curves reported in the studies. Three models allowing hazard ratios (HR) to vary over time were assessed against a fixed-HR model. The Bucher method favored cabozantinib, with a fixed HR for OS vs. nivolumab of 1.09 (95% confidence interval: [0.77, 1.54]). However, all models with time-varying HR showed better fits than the fixed-HR model. The log-logistic model fitted the data best, exhibiting a HR for OS initially favoring cabozantinib, the trend inverting to favor nivolumab after month 5 (95% credible interval <1 from 10 months). The initial probability of cabozantinib conferring superior OS was 54%, falling to 41.5% by month 24. Numerical differences in study-adjusted OS estimates between the two treatments remained small. This study evidences that HR for OS of nivolumab vs. cabozantinib varies over time, favoring cabozantinib in the first months of treatment but nivolumab afterwards, a possible indication that patients with poor prognosis benefit more from cabozantinib in terms of survival, nivolumab benefiting patients with better prognosis. More evidence, including real-world observational data, is needed to compare effectiveness between cabozantinib and nivolumab.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Bayes Theorem; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has markedly improved over the last few years with the introduction of several targeted agents in clinical practice. Nevertheless, either primary or secondary resistance to inhibition of VEGF and mTOR pathways has limited the clinical benefit of these systemic treatments. Recently, a better understanding of the involvement of MET and its ligand HGF in many biological processes made this signaling pathway an attractive therapeutic target in oncology, particularly in mRCC. Herein, we review the development of cabozantinib, a recently approved inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinase receptors, including MET, VEGFRs, and AXL, which has proven to increase progression-free survival and overall survival when compared to everolimus in mRCC patients who had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy. Finally, we discuss the potential role of cabozantinib within the current treatment landscape for mRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Design; Drug Tolerance; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

Multiple agents, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been approved over the past decade for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Here, we focus on nivolumab, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib plus everolimus, agents that have recently emerged with positive clinical data leading to 'Food and Drug Administration approval or pending approval in mRCC. We also review the development of novel agents of interest showing promise in mRCC as part of combination therapy'.. Nivolumab and cabozantinib both offer improved survival over everolimus in the second-line treatment of mRCC. Lenvatinib plus everolimus has similarly shown encouraging survival benefits in a phase II trial for the second-line setting. Novel combinations in mRCC, including dual immune checkpoint blockade, VEGF and programmed death 1 inhibition, VEGF and vaccine therapy, dual angiogenic blockade, and VEGF-directed therapy with nanoparticle-containing camptothecin have shown promising activity in early-phase trials.. Multiple promising agents are available in the treatment of mRCC. The appropriate sequencing of agents in the treatment of mRCC may become further elucidated by future studies that prospectively analyze potential biomarkers to identify patients who will derive the greatest benefit from VEGF, mammalian target of rapamycin, or checkpoint inhibitors.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Management; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Treatment Outcome

Survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved since the advent of targeted therapy. Approved agents include the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib (approved in combination with everolimus), the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus, and the programmed death-1 (PD-1) targeted immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. The identification of predictive and prognostic factors of survival is increasing, and both clinical predictive factors and pathology-related prognostic factors are being evaluated. Serum-based biomarkers and certain histologic subtypes of RCC, as well as clinical factors such as dose intensity and the development of some class effect adverse events, have been identified as predictors of survival. Expression levels of microRNAs, expression of chemokine receptor 4, hypermethylation of certain genes, VEGF polymorphisms, and elevation of plasma fibrinogen or d-dimer have been shown to be prognostic indicators of survival. In the future, prognosis and treatment of patients with mRCC might be based on genomic classification, especially of the 4 most commonly mutated genes in RCC (VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2). Median overall survival has improved for patients treated with a first-line targeted agent compared with survival of patients treated with first-line interferon-α, and results of clinical trials have shown a survival benefit of sequential treatment with targeted agents. Prognosis of patients with mRCC will likely improve with optimization and individualization of current sequential treatment with targeted agents.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; DNA-Binding Proteins; Everolimus; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunologic Factors; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; MicroRNAs; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Niacinamide; Nivolumab; Nuclear Proteins; Phenylurea Compounds; Precision Medicine; Prognosis; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinolines; Receptors, CCR4; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Transcription Factors; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin Thiolesterase; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein

The landscape of systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has dramatically changed with the introduction of targeted agents including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Recently, multiple new agents including growth factor receptor antagonists and a checkpoint inhibitor were approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic RCC based on encouraging benefit shown in clinical trials. Areas covered: The background and biological rationale of existing treatment options including a brief discussion of clinical trials which led to their approval, is presented. This is followed by reviewing the limitations of these therapeutic options, medical need to develop new treatments and major goals of ongoing research. We then discuss two recently approved growth factor receptor antagonists i.e. cabozantinib and lenvatinib, and a recently approved checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, and issues pertaining to drug development, and future directions in treatment of metastatic RCC. Expert opinion: Recently approved growth factor receptor antagonists have shown encouraging survival benefit but associated drug toxicity is a major issue. Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, has similarly shown survival benefit and is well tolerated. With multiple options now available in this patient population, the right sequence of these agents remains to be determined.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Approval; Drug Design; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines; Receptors, Growth Factor

Agents that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway as well as the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab are standard therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recently, cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET, VEGF receptors, and AXL, was approved by the FDA and European Commission based on improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) compared to standard of care treatment with everolimus in a randomized phase 3 trial in advanced RCC after prior VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Areas covered:The preclinical development and scientific rationale, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy and safety of cabozantinib for the treatment of advanced RCC are reviewed. The use of cabozantinib in clinical practice with the growing number of available treatments for advanced RCC is discussed. Expert opinion: Cabozantinib is the only therapy for advanced RCC that has improved PFS, ORR, and OS in a pivotal phase 3 trial after prior antiangiogenic therapy. While no clinical trials have been published comparing cabozantinib with another TKI, available clinical data suggest it could be the most efficacious TKI for second-line therapy. Preliminary encouraging results have also been reported in a phase 2 trial in untreated poor- and intermediate- risk patients with RCC, indicating that treatment with cabozantinib may also be beneficial in the first-line setting.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome

The multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib (Cabometyx™) is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. In the EU, cabozantinib is indicated for the treatment of advanced RCC in adults following prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. In adults with advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC who had previously received VEGF receptor (VEGFR) TKIs, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly prolonged in patients who received oral cabozantinib versus oral everolimus in the pivotal METEOR trial. Objective response was achieved in a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving cabozantinib than those receiving everolimus. Cabozantinib had a manageable adverse events profile in patients with advanced RCC. Thus, cabozantinib is an important new option for use in patients with advanced RCC who have previously received antiangiogenic therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

First-line therapies based on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improved survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Cabozantinib was shown to target kinases involved in immune-escape and to prolong survival in patients pre-treated with tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). The impact of ICIs combinations in first line on subsequent therapies is still unclear.. This is an open label, multicenter, single arm, phase II study designed to assess activity, safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients progressed after an adjuvant or first line anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand (PD-L) 1-based therapy. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.. 31 patients were included in the analysis. After a median (m) follow-up of 11.9 months, mPFS was 8.3 months (90%CI 3.9-17.4) and mOS was 13.8 months (95%CI 7.7-29.0). ORR was 37.9% with an additional 13 patients achieving disease stability. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 47% of patients, including more frequently creatine phosphokinase (CPK) serum level elevation, neutropenia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, hand-food syndrome, oral mucositis and hypertension.. The BREAKPOINT trial met its primary endpoint showing that cabozantinib as second line therapy after ICIs was active in mRCC. Safety profile was manageable.. NCT03463681 - A Study of CaBozantinib in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Renal cEll cArcinoma (BREAKPOINT) - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463681.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Cabozantinib was established as the standard of care for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) whose disease had progressed after vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) therapy in the global randomized trial METEOR. A phase 2 study was conducted to bridge the findings in METEOR to Japanese patients. Here, we report a biomarker analysis and update the efficacy and safety results of cabozantinib treatment.. Japanese patients with RCC who received at least one prior VEGFR-TKI were enrolled and received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory analyses included the relationship between plasma protein hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) levels and treatment responses.. In total, 35 patients were enrolled. The median treatment duration was 58.3 (range 5.1-131.4) weeks. The objective response rate was 25.7% (90% confidence interval [CI] 14.1-40.6). Kaplan-Meier estimate of median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 7.4-18.4). The estimated progression-free survival proportion was 73.1% (95% CI 54.6-85.0) at 6 months. Median overall survival was not reached. Adverse events were consistent with those in METEOR and the safety profile was acceptable. Nonresponders to cabozantinib showed relatively higher HGF levels than responders at baseline.. Updated analyses demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced RCC after at least one VEGFR-TKI therapy. Responders tended to show lower baseline HGF levels ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03339219.

Topics: Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; East Asian People; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial, intravenous nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral cabozantinib (40 mg/day) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To support cabozantinib dosing with the combination, this exposure-response analysis characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with clinical endpoints.. Dose modification was allowed with cabozantinib (holds and reductions) to manage adverse events (AEs). The population pharmacokinetics analysis was updated and used to generate individual predicted cabozantinib exposure measures. Kaplan-Meier plots and time-to-event Cox proportional hazard (CPH) exposure-response models characterized the relationship of cabozantinib exposure with PFS, dose modifications, and selected AEs.. Kaplan-Meier plots showed no clear difference in PFS across cabozantinib exposure quartiles. Cabozantinib exposure did not significantly affect the hazard of PFS in the CPH base model nor in the final model. In contrast, baseline albumin and nivolumab clearance had a significant effect on PFS. There was no significant relationship between cabozantinib clearance and risk of dose modification, but a significant relationship was identified between cabozantinib exposure and Grade ≥ 1 palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia and Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea in the exposure-response analysis.. To optimize individual cabozantinib exposure, these data support the dose modification strategies in CheckMate 9ER for cabozantinib in patients with advanced RCC when combined with nivolumab.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Sunitinib

Recently approved agents for post-vascular endothelial growth factor/post-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) inhibitors treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinomas (mRCC), such as axitinib, nivolumab, and cabozantinib were shown to improve prognosis and substituted everolimus in this setting. We studied practice patterns, efficacy, and tolerability of these agents in a real-world series of Greek patients. We included patients with mRCC who received everolimus, axitinib, or nivolumab after progression on first-line anti-VEGF/VEGFRs therapy. Patients were stratified into three groups. Group A received nivolumab with or without cabozantinib at some point in their disease. Group B received axitinib but without nivolumab or cabozantinib. Group C received only everolimus among the four approved agents. Overall, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Everolimus and nivolumab were mainly used in the second line, while axitinib and cabozantinib were mostly used in the third and fourth lines. Median overall survival (OS) from first-line initiation was 8.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4-not reached], 3.6 (95% CI, 2-6), and 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.4-2.6) for Group A, B, and C, respectively ( P  < 0.001). Median OS from the initiation of second-line therapy was 3.5, 2.7, and 1.3 years, respectively ( P  < 0.001). There was no impact of first-line agent or treatment timing on survival. International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk stratification was associated with OS. Toxicities observed were within expected frequencies. Grade ≥3 events were rare. Adoption of modern standards in everyday treatment of mRCC results in prolongation of survival. Real-world datasets are the new landmarks of survival for future research.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

The efficacy and safety of treatment with cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are unknown.. In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had not previously received treatment and had intermediate or poor prognostic risk according to the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium categories. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of cabozantinib daily in addition to nivolumab and ipilimumab (experimental group) or matched placebo in addition to nivolumab and ipilimumab (control group). Nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) and ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) were administered once every 3 weeks for four cycles. Patients then received nivolumab maintenance therapy (480 mg once every 4 weeks) for up to 2 years. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and was assessed in the first 550 patients who had undergone randomization. The secondary end point was overall survival, assessed in all patients who had undergone randomization.. Overall, 855 patients underwent randomization: 428 were assigned to the experimental group and 427 to the control group. Among the first 550 patients who had undergone randomization (276 in the experimental group and 274 in the control group), the probability of progression-free survival at 12 months was 0.57 in the experimental group and 0.49 in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.94; P = 0.01); 43% of the patients in the experimental group and 36% in the control group had a response. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 79% of the patients in the experimental group and in 56% in the control group. Follow-up for overall survival is ongoing.. Among patients with previously untreated, advanced renal-cell carcinoma who had intermediate or poor prognostic risk, treatment with cabozantinib plus nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the experimental group than in the control group. (Funded by Exelixis; COSMIC-313 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03937219.).

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Prognosis; Survival Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, yet optimised treatment of patients whose disease progresses after these therapies is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether adding atezolizumab to cabozantinib delayed disease progression and prolonged survival in patients with disease progression on or after previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.. CONTACT-03 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, done in 135 study sites in 15 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease had progressed with immune checkpoint inhibitors were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cabozantinib (60 mg orally once daily) or cabozantinib alone. Randomisation was done through an interactive voice-response or web-response system in permuted blocks (block size four) and stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk group, line of previous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and renal cell carcinoma histology. The two primary endpoints were progression-free survival per blinded independent central review and overall survival. The primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04338269, and is closed to further accrual.. From July 28, 2020, to Dec 27, 2021, 692 patients were screened for eligibility, 522 of whom were assigned to receive atezolizumab-cabozantinib (263 patients) or cabozantinib (259 patients). 401 (77%) patients were male and 121 (23%) patients were female. At data cutoff (Jan 3, 2023), median follow-up was 15·2 months (IQR 10·7-19·3). 171 (65%) patients receiving atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 166 (64%) patients receiving cabozantinib had disease progression per central review or died. Median progression-free survival was 10·6 months (95% CI 9·8-12·3) with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 10·8 months (10·0-12·5) with cabozantinib (hazard ratio [HR] for disease progression or death 1·03 [95% CI 0·83-1·28]; p=0·78). 89 (34%) patients in the atezolizumab-cabozantinib group and 87 (34%) in the cabozantinib group died. Median overall survival was 25·7 months (95% CI 21·5-not evaluable) with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and was not evaluable (21·1-not evaluable) with cabozantinib (HR for death 0·94 [95% CI 0·70-1·27]; p=0·69). Serious adverse events occurred in 126 (48%) of 262 patients treated with atezolizumab-cabozantinib and 84 (33%) of 256 patients treated with cabozantinib; adverse events leading to death occurred in 17 (6%) patients in the atezolizumab-cabozantinib group and nine (4%) in the cabozantinib group.. The addition of atezolizumab to cabozantinib did not improve clinical outcomes and led to increased toxicity. These results should discourage sequential use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with renal cell carcinoma outside of clinical trials.. F Hoffmann-La Roche and Exelixis.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Male

Immune checkpoint inhibitor and VEGFR inhibitor combinations are effective treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This phase I/II clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab and cabozantinib in patients with mRCC.. Eligible patients had mRCC with clear-cell or non-clear cell histology, adequate organ function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 performance status, and no prior exposure to pembrolizumab or cabozantinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).. Forty-five patients were enrolled. A total of 40 patients were treated at the RP2D of pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks and cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily, 38 of which were evaluable for response. The ORR was 65.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 49.9-78.8] for all evaluable patients [78.6% as first-line therapy, 58.3% as second-line therapy]. The DCR was 97.4% (95% CI, 86.5-99.9). Median DoR was 8.3 months (interquartile range, 4.6-15.1). At a median follow-up of 23.54 months, the median PFS was 10.45 months (95% CI, 6.25-14.63) and median OS was 30.81 months (95% CI, 24.2-not reached). The most common grade 1 and/or 2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were diarrhea, anorexia, dysgeusia, weight loss, and nausea. The most common grade 3 and/or 4 TRAEs were hypertension, hypophosphatemia, alanine transaminase elevation, diarrhea, and fatigue. There was one grade 5 TRAE of reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome related to cabozantinib.. Pembrolizumab and cabozantinib treatment in patients with mRCC demonstrated encouraging preliminary efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile comparable with other available checkpoint inhibitor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03149822 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149822.. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the combination of pembrolizumab and cabozantinib in patients with mRCC. The safety profile was manageable. The combination showed promising activity with an objective response rate of 65.8%, median PFS of 10.45 months, and median OS of 30.81 months.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms

Cabozantinib monotherapy is an option for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, cabozantinib dose modification and discontinuation due to symptomatic adverse events (AEs) remains a challenge. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help manage symptomatic AEs, which is reported to lead to improved quality of life (QOL), avoidance of drug discontinuation and better survival. This study aims to investigate the clinical benefits of PROs in patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib and the most appropriate medium for PRO monitoring (electronic [e]-PRO or paper-PRO).. This study is being conducted at about 35 sites in Japan. Patients aged ≥18 years with unresectable or metastatic RCC initiating treatment with cabozantinib monotherapy are eligible and will be randomised to: (1) e-PRO monitoring, (2) paper-PRO monitoring or (3) usual care without PRO monitoring. Recruitment began in December 2021 (target sample size, 105). Patients start treatment with cabozantinib 60 mg once daily, and in the PRO groups, will record daily medication intake, weight, temperature, blood pressure and AEs. Endpoints include the proportion of patients with a ≥5-point deterioration on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI-19; primary endpoint), progression-free survival, QOL, dose adjustments, relative dose intensity, treatment-emergent AEs and frequency of interventions for AEs outside of the scheduled visits. Patient and physician opinions of the PRO monitoring systems and patient compliance with e-PRO/paper-PRO input are also being measured.. The study is being conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the Clinical Trials Act. Written informed consent is being obtained from all patients, and the protocol has been approved by the Hokkaido University Hospital Certified Review Board (approval number, CRB021-005). The results will be presented at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.. jRCTs011210055.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

METEOR was a phase 3 trial (NCT01865747) of cabozantinib versus everolimus in adults with advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC previously treated with VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This. Adults with advanced/metastatic clear cell RCC who had received ≥ 1 prior VEGFR-TKI treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or everolimus. Patients were categorized by recruitment region: Europe or outside of Europe (rest of world [RoW]). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between regional subgroups.. In the METEOR trial, efficacy outcomes for patients recruited from European and non-European countries favored cabozantinib over everolimus. The efficacy and safety results for the regional subgroups were consistent with those of the overall METEOR population.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including AXL, MET and VEGF receptors. Here, we describe the rationale and design for the phase II CaboPoint trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03945773), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib as a second-line treatment in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease has progressed despite checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Patients will be recruited into two cohorts: prior ipilimumab plus nivolumab (cohort A) or prior checkpoint inhibitor-VEGF-targeted therapy (cohort B). All patients will receive once-daily oral cabozantinib 60 mg for up to 18 months. The primary end point is objective response rate. Secondary end points include overall survival, progression-free survival and safety.. Most patients diagnosed with kidney cancer have a type of tumor called renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most cases of RCC are described as ‘clear cell’ because the tumor cells appear clear when viewed under a microscope. Cabozantinib is an oral treatment approved for use in some patients with advanced RCC, including those with clear cell disease. Cabozantinib slows RCC progression by targeting pathways that help tumors grow, including inhibition of VEGF. The ongoing CaboPoint study will assess the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with clear cell RCC that has progressed despite previous anticancer treatment involving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). CPI therapy helps the body to detect tumors and to launch its own anticancer response. Patients included in CaboPoint must be adults with clear cell RCC that is not suitable for surgery and has either spread within the kidney or to other organs, despite previous CPI-based therapy. In total, 250 patients will be recruited: 125 who received previous combination CPI treatment (ipilimumab plus nivolumab; group A) and 125 who received previous CPI treatment plus anti-VEGF therapy (group B). Patients will start cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg/day and continue treatment for up to 18 months. The main outcome to be studied will be the number of patients with a reduction in tumor size (objective response rate). The length of time patients live with their disease, the effect of treatment on symptoms and patient safety will also be evaluated. Clinical trial registration: NCT03945773 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Antiangiogenic VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors are approved for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) and their efficacy is higher in high angiogenic tumors. As cabozantinib inhibits multiple tyrosine kinase receptors, including VEGFRs, we tested whether markers of angiogenesis, including microvascular density (MVD) and mast cell density (MCD), could predict benefit from cabozantinib versus everolimus, using RCC samples from the METEOR (NCT01865747) trial.. MVD and MCD were studied in 430 patients (cabozantinib = 216, everolimus = 214) by double immunohistochemistry for CD31 (vascular marker) and tryptase (mast cell marker) coupled with automated image analysis. Results from evaluable cases (MVD = 360, MCD = 325) were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).. MVD was positively correlated with MCD. In the whole cohort, high MVD and high MCD were associated with longer PFS; improved PFS was most evident in patients with high levels of both MCD and MVD. Cabozantinib was associated with improved PFS, OS, and ORR compared with everolimus, irrespective of MVD levels. Cabozantinib was also associated with improved ORR compared with everolimus, irrespective of MCD levels. For PFS and OS, the treatment effect for cabozantinib versus everolimus tended to be greater in tumors with low MCD.. High MVD and high MCD are associated with improved outcome in mccRCC but do not predict efficacy to cabozantinib versus everolimus. The high efficacy of cabozantinib in low angiogenic tumors allows us to speculate that its antitumor activity is not exclusively mediated by VEGFR inhibition.

Topics: Anilides; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

In the CheckMate 9ER trial, patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significantly better progression-free survival compared with those given sunitinib. In this study, we aimed to describe the patient-reported outcome (PRO) results from CheckMate 9ER.. In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 125 cancer centres, urology centres, and hospitals across 18 countries, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma with a clear-cell component, a Karnofsky performance status of 70% or more, and available tumour tissue were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology to nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus oral cabozantinib 40 mg per day, or oral sunitinib 50 mg per day monotherapy for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was reported previously. PROs were analysed as prespecified exploratory endpoints at common timepoints (at baseline and every 6 weeks) until week 115. Disease-related symptoms were evaluated using the 19-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19), and global health status was assessed with the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) visual analogue scale (VAS) and UK utility index. PRO analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Change from baseline was assessed using mixed-model repeated measures. A time-to-deterioration analysis was done for first and confirmed deterioration events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141177, and is closed to recruitment.. Between Sept 11, 2017, and May 14, 2019, 323 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 328 to sunitinib. Median follow-up was 23·5 months (IQR 21·0-26·5). At baseline, patients in both groups reported low symptom burden (FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1 mean scores at baseline were 30·24 [SD 5·19] for the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group and 30·06 [5·03] for the sunitinib group). Change from baseline in PRO scores indicated that nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with more favourable outcomes versus sunitinib (treatment difference 2·38 [95% CI 1·20-3·56], nominal p<0·0001, effect size 0·33 [95% CI 0·17-0·50] for FKSI-19 total score; 1·33 [0·84-1·83], nominal p<0·0001, 0·45 [0·28-0·61] for FKSI-19 disease-related symptoms version 1; 3·48 [1·58-5·39], nominal p=0·0004, 0·30 [0·14-0·47] for EQ-5D-3L VAS; and 0·04 [0·01-0·07], nominal p=0·0036, 0·25 [0·08-0·41] for EQ-5D-3L UK utility index), reaching significance at most timepoints. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with decreased risk of clinically meaningful deterioration for FKSI-19 total score compared with sunitinib (first deterioration event hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·56-0·86], nominal p=0·0007; confirmed deterioration event 0·63 [0·50-0·80], nominal p=0·0001).. PROs were maintained or improved with nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib. Compared with sunitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib significantly delayed time to deterioration of patient-reported outcome scores. These results suggest a benefit for nivolumab plus cabozantinib compared with sunitinib in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.. Bristol Myers Squibb.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Health Status; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Sunitinib

Dual inhibition of glucose and glutamine metabolism results in synergistic anticancer effects in solid tumor models. Telaglenastat, an investigational, small-molecule, glutaminase inhibitor, exhibits modest single-agent activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. This phase Ib trial evaluated telaglenastat plus cabozantinib or everolimus, agents known to impair glucose metabolism in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC).. mRCC patients received escalating doses of telaglenastat [400-800 mg per os (p.o.) twice daily] in a 3 + 3 design, plus either everolimus (10 mg daily p.o.; TelaE) or cabozantinib (60 mg daily p.o.; TelaC). Tumor response (RECISTv1.1) was assessed every 8 weeks. Endpoints included safety (primary) and antitumor activity.. Twenty-seven patients received TelaE, 13 received TelaC, with median 2 and 3 prior therapies, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grades 1 to 2, most common including decreased appetite, anemia, elevated transaminases, and diarrhea with TelaE, and diarrhea, decreased appetite, elevated transaminases, and fatigue with TelaC. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred per cohort: grade 3 pruritic rash with TelaE and thrombocytopenia with TelaC. No maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached for either combination, leading to a recommended phase II dose of 800-mg telaglenastat twice daily with standard doses of E or C. TelaE disease control rate (DCR; response rate + stable disease) was 95.2% [20/21, including 1 partial response (PR)] among 21 patients with clear cell histology and 66.7% (2/3) for papillary. TelaC DCR was 100% (12/12) for both histologies [5/10 PRs as best response (3 confirmed) in clear cell].. TelaE and TelaC showed encouraging clinical activity and tolerability in heavily pretreated mRCC patients.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diarrhea; Enzyme Inhibitors; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Transaminases

In the primary analysis of CheckMate 9ER, nivolumab plus cabozantinib showed superior progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response over sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (median follow-up of 18·1 months). Here, we report extended follow-up of overall survival and updated efficacy and safety.. This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was done in 125 hospitals and cancer centres across 18 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, a Karnofsky performance status of 70% or higher, measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 assessed by the investigator, any International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic risk category, and available tumour tissue for PD-L1 testing. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg) intravenously every 2 weeks plus cabozantinib (40 mg) orally once daily or sunitinib (50 mg orally) once daily (4 weeks per 6-week cycle). Randomisation, stratified by IMDC risk status, tumour PD-L1 expression, and geographical region, was done by permuted block within each stratum using a block size of four, via an interactive response system. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint (reported here as the preplanned final analysis according to the protocol). Efficacy was assessed in all randomly assigned patients; safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. This ongoing study, closed to recruitment, is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141177.. Between Sept 11, 2017, and May 14, 2019, 323 patients were randomly assigned to the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group and 328 to the sunitinib group. With an extended follow-up (data cutoff of June 24, 2021; median 32·9 months [IQR 30·4-35·9]), median overall survival was 37·7 months (95% CI 35·5-not estimable) in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group and 34·3 months (29·0-not estimable) in the sunitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·55-0·90], p=0·0043) and updated median progression-free survival was 16·6 months (12·8-19·8) versus 8·3 months (7·0-9·7; HR 0·56 [95% CI 0·46-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 208 (65%) of 320 patients with nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus 172 (54%) of 320 with sunitinib. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (40 [13%] of 320 patients in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group vs 39 [12%] of 320 in the sunitinib group), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (25 [8%] vs 26 [8%]), and diarrhoea (22 [7%] vs 15 [5%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 70 (22%) of 320 patients in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group and 31 (10%) of 320 in the cabozantinib group. One additional treatment-related death occurred with sunitinib (sudden death).. With extended follow-up and preplanned final overall survival analysis per protocol, nivolumab plus cabozantinib demonstrated improved efficacy versus sunitinib, further supporting the combination in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.. Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Sunitinib

The phase III CheckMate 9ER trial originally included a nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib triplet arm, which was discontinued early due to the evolving treatment landscape for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report an exploratory analysis of patients randomised to the triplet regimen before enrolment discontinuation.. Patients with clear-cell aRCC received nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) Q3W for four cycles with once-daily cabozantinib (40 mg), then nivolumab (240 mg) Q2W plus once-daily cabozantinib (40 mg). CheckMate 9ER primary (progression-free survival [PFS] by blinded independent central review [BICR]) and key secondary (overall survival [OS], objective response rate [ORR] by BICR, and safety) endpoints were applied, along with investigator-assessed PFS and ORR.. Fifty patients were randomised to the triplet regimen. After a median follow-up of 39.1 months (range, 33.4-44.5), median PFS (95% CI) was 9.9 (5.7-16.8) months by BICR and 13.9 (7.3-24.7) months by investigator; median OS (95% CI) was 37.0 (31.8-not estimable) months. ORR (95% CI) was 44.0% (30.0-58.7; complete response, 8.0%) by BICR and 48.0% (33.7-62.6; all partial responses) by investigator. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 84.0%, most commonly alanine aminotransferase increased (20.0%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (16.0%), and hepatotoxicity (16.0%). Grade 3-4 hepatic immune-mediated AEs occurred in 40.0%. There were no grade 5 TRAEs.. These results suggest that the nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib triplet combination has clinical activity in patients with previously untreated aRCC, although monitoring of overlapping toxicities will be important in future studies of this regimen.. gov registration: NCT03141177.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Substantial paradigm shifts have been recently registered in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), with combination therapies including immunotherapy showing unprecedented results. We performed number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) analyses to evaluate these approaches in mRCC.. Clinical data of mRCC patients enrolled in four phase III trials were collected. The rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered. At 6 months, the number of patients that should be treated to prevent one death with sunitinib was 20 for both pembrolizumab-lenvatinib or axitinib, 14 for nivolumab-cabozantinib, and 50 for nivolumab-ipilimumab. NNT was 100 (at 6 months) or >100 (at 12 and 18 months) for nivolumab-ipilimumab. The combinations reported peculiar and not superimposable safety profiles at the NNH analysis.. Although our results should be interpreted with caution, the analysis provides useful insight into the increasingly compelling interpretation of clinical trials. Immune combinations present clinically meaningful differences in terms of efficacy, with some treatments reporting different results at the NNT and the NNH analyses.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Numbers Needed To Treat; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Quinolines

COSMIC-021 is evaluating cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in patients with solid tumors. We report results from patients with advanced clear cell (cc) and non-clear cell (ncc) renal cell carcinoma (RCC).. This phase Ib study (NCT03170960) enrolled patients age ≥ 18 years with advanced RCC. A dose-escalation stage was followed by expansion cohorts. For cohort expansion, prior systemic therapy was not permitted for ccRCC but allowed for nccRCC. Patients received oral cabozantinib 40 mg once a day (ccRCC and nccRCC) or 60 mg once a day (ccRCC only) plus atezolizumab (1,200 mg intravenously, once every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1; the secondary end point was safety.. A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 25.8, 15.3, and 13.3 months for the 40-mg ccRCC, 60-mg ccRCC, and nccRCC groups, respectively. ORR was 53% (80% CI, 41 to 65) in the 40-mg ccRCC group (n = 34) and 58% (80% CI, 46 to 70) in the 60-mg ccRCC group (n = 36), 3% and 11%, respectively, with complete response; median progression-free survival (exploratory end point) was 19.5 and 15.1 months, respectively. In nccRCC (n = 32), ORR was 31% (80% CI, 20 to 44), all partial responses; median progression-free survival was 9.5 months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by 71% of patients in the 40-mg ccRCC group, 67% in the 60-mg ccRCC group, and 38% in the nccRCC group; TRAEs leading to discontinuation of both agents occurred in 15%, 6%, and 3% of patients, respectively. There were no grade 5 TRAEs.. The novel combination of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in patients with advanced ccRCC and nccRCC. Disease control was observed across dose levels and histologic subtypes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyridines

MET (also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor) signalling is a key driver of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Given that no optimal therapy for metastatic PRCC exists, we aimed to compare an existing standard of care, sunitinib, with the MET kinase inhibitors cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of patients with PRCC.. We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done in 65 centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic PRCC who had received up to one previous therapy (excluding vascular endothelial growth factor-directed and MET-directed agents). Patients were randomly assigned to receive sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, or savolitinib, with stratification by receipt of previous therapy and PRCC subtype. All drug doses were administered orally: sunitinib 50 mg, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (dose reductions to 37·5 mg and 25 mg allowed); cabozantinib 60 mg daily (reductions to 40 mg and 20 mg allowed); crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (reductions to 200 mg twice daily and 250 mg once daily allowed); and savolitinib 600 mg daily (reductions to 400 mg and 200 mg allowed). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Analyses were done in an intention-to-treat population, with patients who did not receive protocol therapy excluded from safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761057.. Between April 5, 2016, and Dec 15, 2019, 152 patients were randomly assigned to one of four study groups. Five patients were identified as ineligible post-randomisation and were excluded from these analyses, resulting in 147 eligible patients. Assignment to the savolitinib (29 patients) and crizotinib (28 patients) groups was halted after a prespecified futility analysis; planned accrual was completed for both sunitinib (46 patients) and cabozantinib (44 patients) groups. PFS was longer in patients in the cabozantinib group (median 9·0 months, 95% CI 6-12) than in the sunitinib group (5·6 months, 3-7; hazard ratio for progression or death 0·60, 0·37-0·97, one-sided p=0·019). Response rate for cabozantinib was 23% versus 4% for sunitinib (two-sided p=0·010). Savolitinib and crizotinib did not improve PFS compared with sunitinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 31 (69%) of 45 patients receiving sunitinib, 32 (74%) of 43 receiving cabozantinib, ten (37%) of 27 receiving crizotinib, and 11 (39%) of 28 receiving savolitinib; one grade 5 thromboembolic event was recorded in the cabozantinib group.. Cabozantinib treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS compared with sunitinib in patients with metastatic PRCC.. National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Canada; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Crizotinib; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyrazines; Pyridines; Sunitinib; Triazines; United States

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus cabozantinib as compared with those of sunitinib in the treatment of previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are not known.. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated clear-cell, advanced renal-cell carcinoma to receive either nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus cabozantinib (40 mg once daily) or sunitinib (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response as determined by independent review, and safety. Health-related quality of life was an exploratory end point.. Overall, 651 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus cabozantinib (323 patients) or sunitinib (328 patients). At a median follow-up of 18.1 months for overall survival, the median progression-free survival was 16.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5 to 24.9) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 9.7) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.64; P<0.001). The probability of overall survival at 12 months was 85.7% (95% CI, 81.3 to 89.1) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 75.6% (95% CI, 70.5 to 80.0) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 98.89% CI, 0.40 to 0.89; P = 0.001). An objective response occurred in 55.7% of the patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 27.1% of those receiving sunitinib (P<0.001). Efficacy benefits with nivolumab plus cabozantinib were consistent across subgroups. Adverse events of any cause of grade 3 or higher occurred in 75.3% of the 320 patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 70.6% of the 320 patients receiving sunitinib. Overall, 19.7% of the patients in the combination group discontinued at least one of the trial drugs owing to adverse events, and 5.6% discontinued both. Patients reported better health-related quality of life with nivolumab plus cabozantinib than with sunitinib.. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significant benefits over sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival, overall survival, and likelihood of response in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 9ER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141177.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Sunitinib; Survival Analysis

In the phase 3 METEOR trial, cabozantinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus everolimus in patients with advanced RCC after prior antiangiogenic therapy.. In this exploratory analysis, plasma biomarkers from baseline and week 4 from 621 of 658 randomized patients were analyzed for CA9, HGF, MET, GAS6, AXL, VEGF, VEGFR2, and IL-8. PFS and OS were analyzed by baseline biomarker levels as both dichotomized and continuous variables using univariate and multivariable methods. For on-treatment changes, PFS and OS were analyzed using fold change in biomarker levels at week 4. Biomarkers were considered prognostic if p < 0.05 and predictive if p. Hazard ratios for PFS and OS favored cabozantinib versus everolimus for both low and high baseline levels of all biomarkers (hazard ratios ≤0.78). In univariate analyses, low baseline HGF, AXL, and VEGF were prognostic for improvements in both PFS and OS with cabozantinib, and low HGF was prognostic for improvements in both PFS and OS with everolimus. Low AXL was predictive of relative improvement in PFS for cabozantinib versus everolimus. Results were generally consistent when baseline biomarkers were expressed as continuous variables, although none were predictive of benefit with treatment. In multivariable analysis, low baseline HGF was independently prognostic for improved PFS for both cabozantinib and everolimus; low HGF, GAS6, and VEGF were independently prognostic for improved OS with cabozantinib. No biomarkers were independently prognostic for OS with everolimus. On-treatment increases in some biomarkers appeared prognostic for PFS or OS with cabozantinib in univariate analyses; however, none were independently prognostic in multivariable analysis.. PFS and OS were improved with cabozantinib versus everolimus at high and low baseline levels of all biomarkers. Low baseline HGF was consistently identified as a prognostic biomarker for improved PFS or OS with cabozantinib or everolimus, supporting further prospective evaluation of the prognostic significance of HGF in advanced RCC.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01865747 (registered on 05/31/2013).

Topics: Anilides; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Prognosis; Pyridines; Retreatment; Treatment Outcome

Cabozantinib improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after prior antiangiogenic therapy in the phase III METEOR trial (NCT01865747). Limited data are available on the use of targeted therapies in older patients with advanced RCC.. Efficacy and safety in METEOR were retrospectively analysed for three age subgroups: <65 (n = 394), 65-74 (n = 201) and ≥75 years (n = 63).. PFS, OS and ORR were improved with cabozantinib compared with everolimus in all age subgroups. The PFS hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.68), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.77) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.79) for <65, 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively, and the OS HRs were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.95), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.28-1.14). The ORR for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 15% vs 5%, 21% vs 2% and 19% vs 0%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in PFS or OS with age as a categorical or continuous variable. Grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were generally consistent across subgroups, although fatigue, hypertension and hyponatraemia occurred more frequently in older patients treated with cabozantinib. Dose reductions to manage AEs were more frequent in patients receiving cabozantinib than in those receiving everolimus. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuation due to AEs were more frequent in older patients in both treatment groups.. Cabozantinib improved PFS, OS and ORR compared with everolimus in previously treated patients with advanced RCC, irrespective of age group, supporting use in all age categories. Proactive dose modification and supportive care may help to mitigate AEs in older patients while maintaining efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diarrhea; Everolimus; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib, through a bridging study to METEOR, in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.. This phase II, open-label, single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03339219) included adult Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and measurable disease who had received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily while there was clinical benefit, or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end-point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1. Secondary end-points included clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, or ≥8-week stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival and safety.. Of the 35 patients enrolled, 68.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% had previously received one, two and three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. The median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 27.0 weeks (range 5.1-43.0 weeks). The objective response rate was 20.0% (90% confidence interval 9.8-34.3%), and the clinical benefit rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval 69.7-95.2%). The 6-month estimated progression-free survival was 72.3% (95% confidence interval 53.3-84.6%); the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. All patients reported adverse events, which were manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification; two patients (5.7%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events.. The results showed that findings from METEOR can be extrapolated, and that cabozantinib 60 mg/day is a viable treatment option in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Japan; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib as Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial (CABOSUN) was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluating first-line cabozantinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). This post hoc analysis evaluated quality-adjusted survival using Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST).. Survival plots for cabozantinib and sunitinib (650-day follow-up) were partitioned into 3 health states: time spent before disease progression without toxicity (TWiST; toxicity based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0] grade 3/4 adverse events), time spent before disease progression with toxicity (TOX; durations of adverse events based on published literature), and time after disease recurrence (relapse) or progression to death (REL). Q-TWiST was the sum of the mean time spent in each state, with each state weighted to reflect patient preferences (from 0 [worst] to 1 [best]) using utility scores. TWiST was always weighted as 1. Overall survival and time to disease progression were based on all randomized patients (157 patients); TOX was based on all randomized and treated patients (150 patients).. Across all utility combinations tested, Q-TWiST was found to be longer with cabozantinib versus sunitinib (range of differences, +24 days to +137 days). Q-TWiST differences that were found to be statistically significant (+92 days [95% confidence interval, 5-178 days] to +137 days [95% confidence interval, 60-214 days]) were of a clinically meaningful effect size (≥80 days), and were based on utility values that included those considered relevant for patients with aRCC (REL utility weight of 0.355, TOX utility weight of 0-1, and TWiST utility weight of 1).. In patients with aRCC, first-line cabozantinib was found to provide longer quality-adjusted survival compared with sunitinib. These findings may help to inform clinical decision making.. Cabozantinib and sunitinib are drugs that are used to treat patients with advanced kidney cancer. Clinical trials have shown that cabozantinib offers benefits over sunitinib, giving patients more time before their cancer progresses. It is important that this additional time before disease progression does not come at the expense of patients' quality of life, which can be affected by treatment side effects and/or ongoing cancer symptoms. Both quantity and quality of life are central to optimal treatment. In the current analysis of patients with advanced kidney cancer who were initiating treatment for the first time, cabozantinib provided more quality time before cancer progression compared with sunitinib.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sunitinib; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Cabozantinib treatment prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria in the phase II CABOSUN trial (NCT01835158). In the trial, 157 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or sunitinib, stratified by IMDC risk group and presence of bone metastases. Here, PFS and ORR, both determined by independent radiology committee (IRC), were analyzed by subgroups of baseline characteristics. Cabozantinib treatment was generally associated with improved PFS and ORR versus sunitinib across subgroups, including in groups defined by IMDC risk group, bone metastases, age, and tumor burden.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Prognosis; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Sunitinib; Survival Rate

The activity of cabozantinib in nonclear cell histologies has not been evaluated.. Data were collected across 24 Italian hospitals. Patients were aged 18 years and older with advanced nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 to 2, who had relapsed after previous systemic treatments for metastatic disease. Cabozantinib was administered orally at 60 mg once a day in 28 days cycles. Dose reductions to 40 or 20 mg were made due to toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored using CTCAE version 4.0.. Seventeen patients were enrolled. Three (18%) patients were diagnosed type I papillary RCC, 9 (53%) type II papillary, 3 (18%) chromophobe, and 2 (11%) with Bellini duct carcinoma. In total, 11 patients started with 60 mg. Six patients started a lower dose of 40 mg. Median progression-free survival was 7.83 months (0.4 to 13.4 mo), while median overall survival was not reached but 1-year overall survival was about 60%. Six patients (35%) experienced a partial response to treatment and 6 patients (35%) showed a stable disease. In the remaining 5 (30%), we observed a progressive disease. Grade 3 and 4 AEs were observed in 41% of patients. Among 20 patients, only 1 (6%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Asthenia (41%), diarrhea (35%), aminotransferase increasing (35%), mucosal inflammation (35%), hand and foot syndrome (24%), and hypothyroidism (24%) were the most frequently AEs.. Our data showed that, cabozantinib is a active and feasible treatment in patient with nonclear cell RCC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Purpose In the phase III METEOR trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01865747), 658 previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or everolimus. The cabozantinib arm had improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with everolimus. Changes in quality of life (QoL), an exploratory end point, are reported here. Patients and Methods Patients completed the 19-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) and the five-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline and throughout the study. The nine-item FKSI-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS), a subset of FKSI-19, was also investigated. Data were summarized descriptively and by repeated-measures analysis (for which a clinically relevant difference was an effect size ≥ 0.3). Time to deterioration (TTD) was defined as the earlier of date of death, radiographic progressive disease, or ≥ 4-point decrease from baseline in FKSI-DRS. Results The QoL questionnaire completion rates remained ≥ 75% through week 48 in each arm. There was no difference over time for FKSI-19 Total, FKSI-DRS, or EQ-5D data between the cabozantinib and everolimus arms. Among the individual FKSI-19 items, cabozantinib was associated with worse diarrhea and nausea; everolimus was associated with worse shortness of breath. These differences are consistent with the adverse event profile of each drug. Cabozantinib improved TTD overall, with a marked improvement in patients with bone metastases at baseline. Conclusion In patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, relative to everolimus, cabozantinib generally maintained QoL to a similar extent. Compared with everolimus, cabozantinib extended TTD overall and markedly improved TTD in patients with bone metastases.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

The randomised phase 2 CABOSUN trial comparing cabozantinib with sunitinib as initial therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk met the primary end-point of improving progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by investigator. We report PFS by independent radiology review committee (IRC) assessment, ORR per IRC and updated overall survival (OS).. Previously untreated patients with advanced RCC of intermediate or poor risk by IMDC criteria were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib 60 mg daily or sunitinib 50 mg daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Stratification was by risk group and presence of bone metastases.. A total of 157 patients were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib (n = 79) or sunitinib (n = 78). Median PFS per IRC was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-14.0) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.0-8.2) for cabozantinib versus sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.31-0.74]; two-sided p = 0.0008), and ORR per IRC was 20% (95% CI 12.0-30.8) versus 9% (95% CI 3.7-17.6), respectively. Subgroup analyses of PFS by stratification factors and MET tumour expression were consistent with results for the overall population. With a median follow-up of 34.5 months, median OS was 26.6 months (95% CI 14.6-not estimable) with cabozantinib and 21.2 months (95% CI 16.3-27.4) with sunitinib (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.53-1.21]. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 68% for cabozantinib and 65% for sunitinib.. In this phase 2 trial, cabozantinib treatment significantly prolonged PFS per IRC compared with sunitinib as initial systemic therapy for advanced RCC of poor or intermediate risk.. NCT01835158.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Sunitinib

In the phase 3 METEOR trial (NCT01865747), cabozantinib significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after prior antiangiogenic therapy. A statistically significant improvement in overall survival was observed at a second interim analysis with 320 recorded deaths.. 658 patients with advanced RCC who had received at least one prior VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib (60 mg daily) or everolimus (10 mg daily). Survival follow-up continued to reach the 408 deaths that were pre-specified for the final analysis.. With 430 deaths (198 for cabozantinib and 232 for everolimus), median overall survival was 21.4 months with cabozantinib and 17.1 months with everolimus (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85; P = 0.0002). Safety profiles of cabozantinib and everolimus were consistent with those reported previously.. Cabozantinib significantly improved overall survival compared with everolimus in previously treated patients with advanced RCC with consistent results after long-term follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Survival Analysis

In the phase III METEOR trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival compared to everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had received prior VEGFR inhibitor therapy. In METEOR, RCC patients started at a daily 60-mg cabozantinib tablet (Cabometyx™) dose but could reduce to 40- or 20-mg to achieve a tolerated exposure.. Exposure-response (ER) models were developed to characterize the relationship between cabozantinib at clinically relevant exposures in RCC patients enrolled in METEOR and efficacy (PFS and tumor response) and safety endpoints.. Compared to the average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 60-mg dose, exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses were predicted to result in higher risk of disease progression or death [hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.10 and 1.39, respectively], lower maximal median reduction in tumor size (- 11.9 vs - 9.1 and - 4.5%, respectively), and lower ORR (19.1 vs 15.6 and 8.7%, respectively). The 60-mg exposure was also associated with higher risk for selected adverse events (AEs) palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (grade ≥ 1), fatigue/asthenia (grade ≥ 3), diarrhea (grade ≥ 3), and hypertension (predicted HRs of 2.21, 2.01, 1.78, and 1.85, respectively) relative to the predicted average steady-state cabozantinib concentration for a 20-mg starting dose.. ER modeling predicted that cabozantinib exposures in RCC patients at the 60-mg starting dose would provide greater anti-tumor activity relative to exposures at simulated 40- and 20-mg starting doses that were associated with decreased rates of clinically relevant AEs.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Models, Biological; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

In the phase 3 METEOR trial, cabozantinib improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), after prior antiangiogenic therapy.. Outcomes were evaluated for subgroups defined by prior therapy with sunitinib or pazopanib as the only prior VEGFR inhibitor, or prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.. For the prior sunitinib subgroup (N = 267), median PFS for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 9.1 versus 3.7 months (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.59), ORR was 16% versus 3%, and median OS was 21.4 versus 16.5 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93). For the prior pazopanib subgroup (N = 171), median PFS for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 7.4 versus 5.1 months (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99), ORR was 19% versus 4%, and median OS was 22.0 versus 17.5 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42-1.04). For prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (N = 32), median PFS was not reached for cabozantinib versus 4.1 months for everolimus (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.65), ORR was 22% versus 0%, and median OS was not reached versus 16.3 months (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.52).. Cabozantinib was associated with improved clinical outcomes versus everolimus in patients with advanced RCC, irrespective of prior therapy, including checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Treatment Outcome

Purpose Cabozantinib is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, MET, and AXL and is a standard second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This randomized phase II multicenter trial evaluated cabozantinib compared with sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had untreated clear cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and were intermediate or poor risk per International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cabozantinib (60 mg once per day) or sunitinib (50 mg once per day; 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety were secondary end points. Results From July 2013 to April 2015, 157 patients were randomly assigned (cabozantinib, n = 79; sunitinib, n = 78). Compared with sunitinib, cabozantinib treatment significantly increased median PFS (8.2 v 5.6 months) and was associated with a 34% reduction in rate of progression or death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95; one-sided P = .012). ORR was 33% (95% CI, 23 to 44) for cabozantinib versus 12% (95% CI, 5.4 to 21) for sunitinib. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 67% for cabozantinib and 68% for sunitinib and included diarrhea (cabozantinib, 10% v sunitinib, 11%), fatigue (6% v 15%), hypertension (28% v 22%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (8% v 4%), and hematologic adverse events (3% v 22%). Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in PFS and ORR over standard-of-care sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Sunitinib

Cabozantinib is an oral inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, VEGFR, and AXL. The randomised phase 3 METEOR trial compared the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib versus the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed after previous VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. Here, we report the final overall survival results from this study based on an unplanned second interim analysis.. In this open-label, randomised phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years and older with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, measurable disease, and previous treatment with one or more VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors to receive 60 mg cabozantinib once a day or 10 mg everolimus once a day. Randomisation was done with an interactive voice and web response system. Stratification factors were Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group and the number of previous treatments with VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent radiology review committee in the first 375 randomly assigned patients and has been previously reported. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response in all randomly assigned patients assessed by intention-to-treat. Safety was assessed per protocol in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is closed for enrolment but treatment and follow-up of patients is ongoing for long-term safety evaluation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01865747.. Between Aug 8, 2013, and Nov 24, 2014, 658 patients were randomly assigned to receive cabozantinib (n=330) or everolimus (n=328). The median duration of follow-up for overall survival and safety was 18·7 months (IQR 16·1-21·1) in the cabozantinib group and 18·8 months (16·0-21·2) in the everolimus group. Median overall survival was 21·4 months (95% CI 18·7-not estimable) with cabozantinib and 16·5 months (14·7-18·8) with everolimus (hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·53-0·83]; p=0·00026). Cabozantinib treatment also resulted in improved progression-free survival (HR 0·51 [95% CI 0·41-0·62]; p<0·0001) and objective response (17% [13-22] with cabozantinib vs 3% [2-6] with everolimus; p<0·0001) per independent radiology review among all randomised patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (49 [15%] in the cabozantinib group vs 12 [4%] in the everolimus group), diarrhoea (43 [13%] vs 7 [2%]), fatigue (36 [11%] vs 24 [7%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (27 [8%] vs 3 [1%]), anaemia (19 [6%] vs 53 [17%]), hyperglycaemia (3 [1%] vs 16 [5%]), and hypomagnesaemia (16 [5%] vs none). Serious adverse events grade 3 or worse occurred in 130 (39%) patients in the cabozantinib group and in 129 (40%) in the everolimus group. One treatment-related death occurred in the cabozantinib group (death; not otherwise specified) and two occurred in the everolimus group (one aspergillus infection and one pneumonia aspiration).. Treatment with cabozantinib increased overall survival, delayed disease progression, and improved the objective response compared with everolimus. Based on these results, cabozantinib should be considered as a new standard-of-care treatment option for previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients should be monitored for adverse events that might require dose modifications.. Exelixis Inc.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Pyridines; Survival Rate

Cabozantinib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) as well as MET and AXL, each of which has been implicated in the pathobiology of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma or in the development of resistance to antiangiogenic drugs. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib, as compared with everolimus, in patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy.. We randomly assigned 658 patients to receive cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily or everolimus at a dose of 10 mg daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary efficacy end points were overall survival and objective response rate.. Median progression-free survival was 7.4 months with cabozantinib and 3.8 months with everolimus. The rate of progression or death was 42% lower with cabozantinib than with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.75; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 21% with cabozantinib and 5% with everolimus (P<0.001). A planned interim analysis showed that overall survival was longer with cabozantinib than with everolimus (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P=0.005) but did not cross the significance boundary for the interim analysis. Adverse events were managed with dose reductions; doses were reduced in 60% of the patients who received cabozantinib and in 25% of those who received everolimus. Discontinuation of study treatment owing to adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients who received cabozantinib and in 10% of those who received everolimus.. Progression-free survival was longer with cabozantinib than with everolimus among patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy. (Funded by Exelixis; METEOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01865747.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis

Cabozantinib targets tyrosine kinases including the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2, which are important drug targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).. This single-arm open-label phase I trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of cabozantinib in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic clear cell RCC.. The study enrolled 25 RCC patients for whom standard therapy had failed. Patients received a median of two prior systemic agents, and most patients had previously received at least one VEGF pathway inhibiting therapy (22 patients [88%]). Common adverse events included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, proteinuria, appetite decreased, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and vomiting. Partial response was reported in seven patients (28%). Median progression-free survival was 12.9 months, and median overall survival was 15.0 months.. Cabozantinib demonstrates preliminary anti-tumor activity and a safety profile similar to that seen with other multitargeted VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced RCC patients. Further evaluation of cabozantinib in RCC is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01100619.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden

Cabozantinib, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor widely used in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and medullary thyroid carcinoma. To date, no ocular adverse events have been reported by the FDA or on the package label. Here, we described a patient with metastatic RCC who developed bilateral optic disc edema after a 4-month course of cabozantinib.. A 55-year-old ethnic Chinese male with RCC with multiple metastases presented to our department with progressive blurred vision in both eyes for 1 month. He started taking cabozantinib 60 mg once daily 5 months prior to this presentation. Poor visual acuity and bilateral disc edema were then noted. Cabozantinib was discontinued after that, and 3-day pulse steroid therapy with methylprednisolone 1 g/day was given. The optic disc edema subsided gradually with limited improvement in visual acuity.. Bilateral optic edema should be considered as a complication associated with cabozantinib. We propose discontinuation of the treatment in cases such as that, and pulse steroid therapy should be considered if there is no contraindication.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Methylprednisolone; Middle Aged; Papilledema

There are limited data evaluating the activity of cabozantinib (CABO) as second line (2L) therapy post standard of care ipilimumab-nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) or immuno-oncology(IO)/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (VEGFi) combinations (IOVE).. Using the IMDC database, we sought to identify the objective response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) of 2L CABO after IPI-NIVO, IOVE combinations, pazopanib or sunitinib (PAZ/SUN) or other first line (1L) therapies. Multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for underlying differences in IMDC groups, was used to compare differences in OS for 2L CABO based on preceding therapy.. Three hundred and forty-six patients received 2L CABO (78 post IPI NIVO, 46 post IOVE, 161 post PAZ/SUN, 61 post Other). Of the entire cohort, 12.6%, 62.6%, and 24.8% were IMDC favourable, intermediate, and poor risk, respectively. Patients that received 1L IPI-NIVO had a median OS of 21.4 (95% CI, 12.1 - NE [Not evaluable]) months compared to 15.7 (95% CI, 9.3 - NE) months in 1L IOVE and 20.7 (95% CI, 15.6 - 35.6) months in 1L PAZ/SUN, P = .28. Median TTF from the initiation of 2L CABO in the overall population was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.6 - 9.0) months. We were unable to detect a significant difference in 2L CABO OS based on type of 1L therapy received: 1L IPI-NIVO (reference group) vs. 1L IOVE HR 1.73 (95% CI, 0.83 - 3.62 P = .14), 1L PAZ/SUN 1.16 (95% CI, 0.67 - 2.00 P = .60), however given the retrospective observational nature of this work a lack of sufficient power may contribute to this.. In a large real world dataset, we identified clinically meaningful activity of 2L CABO after all evaluated contemporary 1L therapies, irrespective of whether the 1L regimen included a VEGFi. These are real world benchmarks with which to counsel our patients.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Sunitinib; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Despite 4 approved combination regimens in the first-line setting for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), adverse event (AE) costs data are lacking.. A descriptive analysis on 2 AE cost comparisons was conducted using patient-level data for the nivolumab-based therapies and published data for the pembrolizumab-based therapies. First, grade 3/4 AE costs were compared between nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab + cabozantinib vs. pembrolizumab + axitinib using data from the CheckMate 214 (median follow-up [mFU]: 13.1 months), CheckMate 9ER (mFU: 12.8 months), and KEYNOTE-426 (mFU: 12.8 months) trials, respectively. Second, grade 3/4 AE costs were compared between nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab + cabozantinib vs. pembrolizumab + lenvatinib using data from the CheckMate 214 (mFU: 26.7 months), CheckMate 9ER (mFU: 23.5 months), and KEYNOTE-581 (mFU: 26.6 months) trials, respectively. Per-patient costs for all-cause and treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs with corresponding any-grade AE rates ≥ 20% were calculated based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database and inflated to 2020 US dollars.. Per-patient all-cause grade 3/4 AE costs for nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab + cabozantinib vs. pembrolizumab + axitinib were $2703 vs. $4508 vs. $5772, and treatment-related grade 3/4 AE costs were $741 vs. $2722 vs. $4440 over ~12.8 months of FU. For nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab + cabozantinib vs. pembrolizumab + lenvatinib, per-patient all-cause grade 3/4 AE costs were $3120 vs. $5800 vs. $9285, while treatment-related grade 3/4 AE costs were $863 vs. $3162 vs. $5030 over ~26.6 months of FU.. Patients with aRCC treated with first-line nivolumab-based therapies had lower grade 3/4 all-cause and treatment-related AE costs than pembrolizumab-based therapies, suggesting a more favorable cost-benefit profile.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Costs and Cost Analysis; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Sunitinib

Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), is now used to treat many advanced cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cancer. Immune-related adverse events are characteristic side effects of ICIs. Among them, fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening and clinically significant concern. Cabozantinib is known as a multikinase inhibitor. In recent years, combination therapy with nivolumab and cabozantinib has begun to be used to treat renal cell carcinoma. A 74-year-old man with no history of diabetes was treated with nivolumab for 5 years for NSCLC, followed by the combination of nivolumab and cabozantinib for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. He was diagnosed with fulminant type 1 diabetes 5 weeks after starting combination therapy, with symptoms of nausea and dry mouth. He was admitted to the intensive care unit and improved clinically with continuous insulin infusion and saline. The involvement of cabozantinib in the development of fulminant type 1 diabetes with long-term nivolumab use, which has not been reported previously, is unknown, but caution may be necessary in terms of glycemic control in combination therapy with nivolumab and cabozantinib.

Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab

There is a paucity of data on the safety of cabozantinib use in combination with radiotherapy.. To report the practice patterns, safety, and efficacy of cabozantinib with radiotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).. An international multicenter retrospective study was conducted. Patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib at any line of therapy and who received radiotherapy between 30 d prior to the start date of cabozantinib and 30 d following discontinuation of cabozantinib, from 2014 to 2020, were included. Concurrent use was defined as the use of cabozantinib on radiotherapy treatment days during any course of radiotherapy.. The primary outcomes of interest were the rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurring within 90 d of receipt of radiotherapy. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization rate and patterns of cabozantinib and radiotherapy use. Baseline characteristics and AEs were presented descriptively.. A total of 127 consecutive patients were included. Most patients had clear cell histology (88%), had International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate-risk disease (57%), and had received at least one prior line of therapy (93%). Of 127 patients, 67 (53%) received concurrent cabozantinib with radiotherapy, while the remaining held cabozantinib on radiotherapy days. Overall, grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 6.3% (n = 8/127) of patients. No grade 5 events were observed. In patients treated with conventional palliative radiotherapy (n = 88), the rate of grade 3-4 AEs in those who had concurrent versus those who had nonconcurrent cabozantinib was 6.3% (n = 3/48) versus 5.0% (n = 2/40). No patient was hospitalized due to radiotherapy-related toxicity. In patients treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR; n = 50), the rate of grade 3-4 AEs in those who had concurrent versus those who had nonconcurrent cabozantinib was 3.6% (n = 1/28) versus 9.1% (n = 2/22). One patient in the nonconcurrent group was hospitalized due to muscle weakness suspected to be related to associated vasogenic edema 19 d after SABR for multiple brain metastases.. In this real-world study of patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib, 53% of patients received radiotherapy concurrently, with few grade 3-4 AEs reported within 90 d of receiving radiotherapy. The use of radiotherapy and cabozantinib requires a risk-benefit assessment of patient and disease characteristics to optimize therapy regimens.. Our study reports the real-world experience of using radiotherapy in patients receiving cabozantinib for metastatic kidney cancer. Over half of the patients continued taking cabozantinib while receiving radiotherapy, and few patients developed serious side effects. The combined use of radiotherapy and cabozantinib requires a careful risk-benefit assessment to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies

In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on cabozantinib, venous thromboembolism (VTE) management remains challenging due to limited safety data regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use in conjunction with cabozantinib. We investigated the safety of cabozantinib with different anticoagulants in patients with RCC.. In this retrospective multicenter study (9 sites), patients with advanced RCC were allocated into 4 groups: (1) cabozantinib without anticoagulation, cabozantinib with concomitant use of (2) DOACs, (3) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or (4) warfarin. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of major bleeding events (defined per International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of new/recurrent VTE while anticoagulated.. Between 2016 and 2020, 298 patients with RCC received cabozantinib (no anticoagulant = 178, LMWH = 41, DOAC = 64, and warfarin = 15). Most patients had clear cell histology (78.5%) and IMDC intermediate/poor disease (78.2%). Cabozantinib was first, second, or ≥ third line in 21.8%, 31.9%, 43.3% of patients, respectively. Overall, there was no difference in major bleeding events between the no anticoagulant, LMWH, and DOAC groups (P = .088). Rate of new/recurrent VTE was similar among anticoagulant groups. Patients with a VTE had a statistically significantly worse survival than without a VTE (HR 1.48 [CI 95% 1.05-2.08, P = .02]).. This real-world cohort provides first data on bleeding and thrombosis complications in patients with RCC treated with cabozantinib with or without concurrent anticoagulation. DOACs appear safe for VTE treatment for patients with RCC on cabozantinib, but optimized anticoagulation management, including individualized risk-benefit discussion, remains important in clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasms; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The BONSAI phase II trial recently demonstrated the activity of cabozantinib in metastatic collecting duct patients. The outcomes of patients in this setting treated with immunotherapy as second-line is unknown. The aim of the present report was to describe outcomes of patients enrolled in the BONSAI trial that received nivolumab as second-line treatment.. We describe the oncological outcomes in terms of overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. We excluded patients that did not receive any second-line treatment or were treated with agents other than nivolumab.. We identified five patients of whom one was excluded due to lack of data. Three patients obtained clinical benefit (one partial response, two stable disease); the second-line progression-free survival (nivolumab) ranged from 2.8 to 19.9 months to and second-line overall survival ranged from 5.1 to 26.5 months. No new safety signals were observed.. Nivolumab may be considered as second-line therapy option after cabozantinib failure in selected metastatic collecting duct carcinoma patients.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the backbone of the systemic treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). TKIs such as pazopanib and cabozantinib can interact with other drugs concomitantly administered, particularly with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), possibly impacting the effectiveness of the anticancer treatment and patients outcome. Few data are available about this interaction. We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational data collection of patients with mRCC treated with pazopanib or cabozantinib between January 2012 and December 2020 in nine Italian centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The aim was to describe the impact of baseline concomitant PPIs on the outcome of patients to pazopanib and cabozantinib in terms of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), toxicity, and treatment compliance. The use of PPI in our study population (301 patients) significantly influenced the effectiveness of TKIs with worse PFS (16.3 vs. 9.9 months; P < 0.001) and OS (30.6 vs. 18.4 months; P = 0.013) in patients taking PPI at TKI initiation. This detrimental effect was maintained both in the pazopanib and cabozantinib groups. The use of PPI influenced the toxicity and TKI treatment compliance with a reduction of dose or schedule modifications, and treatment interruptions in the population taking PPIs. Our study demonstrates that the use of PPIs can significantly influence the outcome and compliance of patients with mRCC to TKI treatment, suggesting the importance of a more careful selection of patients who need a gastroprotective therapy, avoiding indiscriminate use of PPIs.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has significantly evolved in recent years. Without direct comparator trials, factors such as cost effectiveness (CE) are important to guide decision-making.. To assess the CE of guideline-recommended approved first- and second-line treatment regimens.. A comprehensive Markov model was developed to analyze the CE of the five current National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended first-line therapies with appropriate second-line therapy for patient cohorts with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium favorable and intermediate/poor risk.. Life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and total accumulated costs were estimated using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.. In patients with favorable risk, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib added $32 935 in costs and yielded 0.28 QALYs, resulting in an incremental CE ratio (ICER) of $117 625 per QALY in comparison to pembrolizumab + axitinib followed by cabozantinib. In patients with intermediate/poor risk, nivolumab + ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib added $2252 in costs and yielded 0.60 QALYs compared to cabozantinib followed by nivolumab, yielding an ICER of $4184. Limitations include differences in median follow-up duration between treatments.. Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab + axitinib followed by cabozantinib were cost-effective treatment sequences for patients with favorable-risk mRCC. Nivolumab +ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib was the most cost-effective treatment sequence for patients with intermediate-/poor-risk mRCC, dominating all preferred treatments.. Because new treatments for kidney cancer have not been compared head to head, comparison of their cost and efficacy can help in making decisions about the best treatments to use first. Our model showed that patients with a favorable risk profile are most likely to benefit from pembrolizumab and lenvatinib or axitinib followed by cabozantinib, while patients with an intermediate or poor risk profile will probably benefit most from nivolumab and ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib.

Topics: Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

The comparative efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab plus axitinib as first-line treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) have not been assessed in head-to-head trials.. To assess the efficacy and HRQoL outcomes of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab plus axitinib.. Patient-level data for nivolumab plus cabozantinib from the CheckMate 9ER trial and published data for pembrolizumab plus axitinib from the KEYNOTE-426 trial were used. CheckMate 9ER data were reweighted to match the key baseline characteristics as reported in KEYNOTE-426.. Nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk) plus cabozantinib (40 mg once daily) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 wk) plus axitinib (5 mg twice daily, initially).. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS), and deterioration in HRQoL were assessed using weighted Cox proportional-hazard models, with sunitinib as a common anchor. Objective response rates (ORRs) and changes in HRQoL scores from baseline were assessed as difference-in-differences for the two treatments relative to sunitinib.. After balancing patient characteristics between the trials, nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR [95% confidence interval {CI}] 0.70 [0.53-0.93]; p = 0.01) and a significantly decreased risk of confirmed deterioration in HRQoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-related Symptoms: HR [95% CI] 0.48 [0.34-0.69]) versus pembrolizumab plus axitinib. OS was similar between treatments (HR [95% CI] 0.99 [0.67-1.44]; p = 0.94). Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with numerically greater ORRs (difference-in-difference [95% CI] 8.4% [-1.7 to 18.4]; p = 0.10) and longer duration of response (HR [95% CI] 0.79 [0.47-1.31]; p = 0.36) than pembrolizumab plus axitinib. Comparative studies using data with a longer duration of follow-up are warranted.. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib significantly improved PFS and HRQoL compared with pembrolizumab plus axitinib as first-line treatment for aRCC.. This study was conducted to indirectly compare the results of two immunotherapy-based combinations-nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab plus axitinib-for patients who have not received any treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients who received nivolumab plus cabozantinib had a significant improvement in the length of time without worsening of their disease and in their perceived physical and mental health compared with pembrolizumab plus axitinib; patients remained alive for a similar length of time from the start of either treatment. This analysis further adds to our current knowledge of the relative benefits of these two treatment regimens and will help with physician and patient treatment decisions.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Quality of Life; Sunitinib

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Line; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Sunitinib

The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib therapy initiated between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2022 was evaluated based on a retrospective review of data from 14 renal centers in Hungary. The starting dose was 60 or 40 mg. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were performed every 4 weeks and imaging studies 3-monthly. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity according to NCI CTCAE 4.0. A total of 230 patient records were evaluated, 201 (87.4%) of them had clear cell RCC. Cabozantinib was administered as third, second and first-line treatment in 48.7%, 38.3% and <5% of cases, respectively. Dose reductions occurred in 62.6% and treatment interruption in 6.5%. Duration of therapy was 10.03 months, which was independent of dose reduction. Overall tumor response rate was 39.2% and clinical benefit was 82.8%. The duration of first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment was 11.47, 8.03, 11.57 and 10.13 months, respectively. Overall survival from the start of therapy was 22.0 months. Cabozantinib therapy in daily practice was more beneficial than according to registry study results. Dose reduction did not affect efficacy.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Hungary; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment is still largely based on TKI use. Treatment adjustment due to toxicities is often needed. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of treatment modifications on the outcome of mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib or pazopanib.. This retrospective multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients receiving cabozantinib or pazopanib between January 2012 and December 2020. We evaluated the correlation of TKI treatment modifications with grade 3-4 toxicities and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also performed a landmark analysis excluding patients who did not undergo at least 5 months of therapy.. Among 301 patients, 179 (59%) were treated with pazopanib, 122 (41%) with cabozantinib. Treatment modifications were related to grade 3-4 toxicities (. Tailoring treatment with pazopanib and cabozantinib was associated with better PFS/OS.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Belzutifan plus cabozantinib has antitumor activity in previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immunotherapy; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib therapy initiated between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2022 was evaluated based on a retrospective review of data from 14 renal centers in Hungary. The starting dose was 60 or 40 mg. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were performed every 4 weeks and imaging studies 3-monthly. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity according to NCI CTCAE 4.0. A total of 230 patient records were evaluated, 201 (87.4%) of them had clear cell RCC. Cabozantinib was administered as third, second and first-line treatment in 48.7%, 38.3% and <5% of cases, respectively. Dose reductions occurred in 62.6% and treatment interruption in 6.5%. Duration of therapy was 10.03 months, which was independent of dose reduction. Overall tumor response rate was 39.2% and clinical benefit was 82.8%. The duration of first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment was 11.47, 8.03, 11.57 and 10.13 months, respectively. Overall survival from the start of therapy was 22.0 months. Cabozantinib therapy in daily practice was more beneficial than according to registry study results. Dose reduction did not affect efficacy.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Hungary; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This article describes the main acquisitions of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management presented during the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. In particular, the efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence was confirmed through a subgroup analysis. In the metastatic setting, the updated analysis of the CheckMate 9ER study confirmed the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) of the combination of nivolumab plus cabozantinib; of note, this survival advantage was clear in the subgroup of patients at poor IMDC prognosis, but not in favorable IMDC risk group patients. As concern the triplet therapy (i.e. nivolumab+ipilumumab+cabozantinib), the updated analysis of the COSMIC-313 study confirmed a significant PFS advantage in the subgroup of mRCC patients at intermediate IMDC risk, while the lack of benefit in the poor risk group supports the critical role of immunotherapy (but not of VEGFR-TKIs) in this poor prognosis subgroup of patients. Finally, the activity of cabozantinib as second-line therapy after progression to ICI-based combinations was prospectively assessed. This 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium laid the foundations for further knowledge development necessary for an increasingly personalized management of mRCC.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

We first evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus cabozantinib compared with cabozantinib alone as a first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) from a US healthcare payer perspective. In the present study, we found that nivolumab plus cabozantinib was not cost-effective compared with cabozantinib alone for first-line treatment of mRCC.. This economic evaluation study used a 3-state partitioned survival model to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib alone. The observed Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival and PFS were digitized from the CheckMate 9ER and CABOSUN trials and the long-term survivals (over a lifetime horizon) beyond the end of the trial were extrapolated using the Log-Logistic model. The cost and health preference data were collected from published literature before.. The estimated cost for nivolumab plus cabozantinib group was 654 851.32 USD, which was higher than 312 360.47 USD estimated for cabozantinib alone group, resulting in an incremental cost (IC) of 342 490.85 USD. Compared with cabozantinib alone group, nivolumab plus cabozantinib group gains 1.19 QALYs, resulting the ICER was 288 443.23 USD per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested the cost of nivolumab, the discount rate, and the cost of cabozantinib had a great impact on the ICER. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed the probability of nivolumab plus cabozantinib being cost-effective was 9.9% at a threshold of 150,000 USD per QALY.. The findings of this economic evaluation suggest nivolumab plus cabozantinib is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with cabozantinib alone as first-line treatment for mRCC at WTP thresholds of 150,000 USD per QALY from the perspective of US payers. A substantial price reduction for nivolumab would be needed to achieve favorable cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a major class of targeted cancer therapy drugs. Overcoming the limitations of approved TKIs and the development of new TKIs continues to be an important need. The adoption of higher throughput and accessible animal models to evaluate TKI adverse effects will help in this regard. We exposed zebrafish larvae to a set of 22 Food and Drug Administration-approved TKIs and assessed mortality, early developmental abnormalities, and gross morphological abnormalities posthatching. We found edema posthatching as a consistent and prominent consequence of VEGFR inhibitors, and of cabozantinib in particular. The edema occurred at concentrations that did not cause lethality or any other abnormality, and was independent of the developmental stage. Further experiments identified loss of blood and lymphatic vasculature, and suppression of renal function in larvae exposed to 10 µM cabozantinib. Molecular analysis showed downregulation of the vasculature marker genes vegfr, prox1a, sox18, and the renal function markers nephrin and podocin as the potential molecular basis for the above defects, implicating them in the mechanism of cabozantinib-induced edema. Our findings reveal edema as a previously unreported phenotypic effect of cabozantinib and identify the likely mechanistic basis. These findings also highlight the need for studies investigating edema due to vascular and renal dysfunction as a potential clinical adverse effect of cabozantinib, and possibly other VEGFR inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Zebrafish

Rhabdomyolysis, which is primarily characterized by serum creatine kinase (CK) elevation, is a potentially fatal disease, and it can occur in a variety of etiologies, including drug-induced. Cabozantinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This retrospective case series aimed to investigate the frequency of cabozantinib-induced CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis, and to reveal their detailed clinical features.. To investigate the frequency of cabozantinib-induced serum CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical information and laboratory data of the patients with advanced RCC who received cabozantinib monotherapy at our institution from April 2020 to April 2023. Data were retrieved from the electronic medical records and the RCC database of our institution. Primary endpoint of the current case series was the frequency of CK elevation and rhabdomyolysis.. Sixteen patients were retrieved form the database and 13 were included in the case series (excluded by clinical trial enrollment [n = 2] and short-term administration [n = 1]). Eight (61.5%) patients among them experienced serum CK elevation, including five patients who were classified into grade 1. CK elevation occurred a median of 14 days after initiation of cabozantinib. Two patients with grade 2 or 3 of CK elevation developed rhabdomyolysis with muscle weakness and/or acute kidney injury.. CK elevation may frequently happen during cabozantinib treatment, and in most cases, it may be asymptomatic and may not be clinically problematic. However, medical providers should be aware that symptomatic CK elevations suggestive of rhabdomyolysis may occasionally occur.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Creatine Kinase; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rhabdomyolysis

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Real-world data of cabozantinib after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population are limited. Additionally, prognostic factors of cabozantinib in this setting are still unknown.. We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 patients treated with cabozantinib subsequent to failed immune checkpoint inhibitors at four institutions. Regarding the efficacy profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate were assessed. In terms of the safety profile, rate of adverse events, dose reduction and treatment interruption were assessed. Furthermore, risk factors of progression-free survival were analyzed.. Twenty-nine patients (52%) were treated with cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Most frequent prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy as first-line therapy (n = 30, 54%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.76 and 25.5 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 34%. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 31 patients (55%). Forty-four (79%) and 31 (55%) patients needed dose reduction and treatment interruption, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduced initial dose (i.e. <60 mg) (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0355) and presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0172) were independent factors of shorter progression-free survival.. Cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. These results appear to be similar to those of previous clinical trials.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; East Asian People; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab

Renal cancer is the seventh most common cancer in men and the tenth in women. The aim of this article is to review the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of renal carcinoma accompanied by recommendations with new evidence and treatment algorithms. A new pathologic classification of RCC by the World Health Organization (WHO) was published in 2022 and this classification would be considered a "bridge" to a future molecular classification. For patients with localized disease, surgery is the treatment of choice with nephron-sparing surgery recommended when feasible. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab is an option for intermediate-or high-risk cases, as well as patients after complete resection of metastatic disease. More data are needed in the future, including positive overall survival data. Clinical prognostic classification, preferably IMDC, should be used for treatment decision making in mRCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy should not be deemed mandatory in individuals with intermediate-poor IMDC/MSKCC risk who require systemic therapy. Metastasectomy can be contemplated in selected subjects with a limited number of metastases or long metachronous disease-free interval. For the population of patients with metastatic ccRCC as a whole, the combination of pembrolizumab-axitinib, nivolumab-cabozantinib, or pembrolizumab-lenvatinib can be considered as the first option based on the benefit obtained in OS versus sunitinib. In cases that have an intermediate IMDC and poor prognosis, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has demonstrated superior OS compared to sunitinib. As for individuals with advanced RCC previously treated with one or two antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, nivolumab and cabozantinib are the options of choice. When there is progression following initial immunotherapy-based treatment, we recommend treatment with an antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. While no clear sequence can be advocated, medical oncologists and patients should be aware of the recent advances and new strategies that improve survival and quality of life in the setting of metastatic RC.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab; Quality of Life; Sunitinib; Tyrosine

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) therapeutic landscape. Nevertheless, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) axis still play a key role. The aim of the present study was to explore the prognostic performance of an integrated blood score, based on hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and red cell distribution width (RDW), in mRCC patients treated with anti-VEGF TKIs. The primary endpoint was to correlate Hb, MCV, and RDW with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).. Our multicenter retrospective observational study involved mRCC patients treated with pazopanib or cabozantinib from January 2012 to December 2020 in nine Italian centers. Clinical records and laboratory data, including Hb levels, MCV, and RDW, were collected at baseline. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.. We enrolled 301 mRCC patients of which 179 (59%) underwent pazopanib, and 122 (41%) cabozantinib. We considered baseline Hb ≥12 g/dL, MCV >87 fL, and RDW ≤16% as good prognostic factors; hence, developing a multiparametric score capable of delineating 4 different categories. The number of good prognostic factors was associated with significantly longer PFS and OS (. Our analyses demonstrate the prognostic role of a multiparametric score based on easily exploitable blood parameters, such as Hb concentration, MCV, and RDW. The red blood cell-based score may underlie the upregulation of the HIF-1α pathway and VEGF axis, thereby identifying a selected population who is likely to benefit from TKI therapy.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Erythrocytes; Hemoglobins; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Prognosis; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), c-Met, is overexpressed and hyper active in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most of the therapeutic agents mediate cancer cell death through increased oxidative stress. Induction of c-Met in renal cancer cells promotes the activation of redox-sensitive transcription factor Nrf2 and cytoprotective heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which can mediate therapeutic resistance against oxidative stress. c-Met/RTK inhibitor, Cabozantinib, has been approved for the treatment of advanced RCC. However, acquired drug resistance is a major hurdle in the clinical use of cabozantinib. Honokiol, a naturally occurring phenolic compound, has a great potential to downregulate c-Met-induced pathways. In this study, we found that a novel combination treatment with cabozantinib + Honokiol inhibits the growth of renal cancer cells in a synergistic manner through increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS); and it significantly facilitates apoptosis-and autophagy-mediated cancer cell death. Activation of c-Met can induce Rubicon (a negative regulator of autophagy) and p62 (an autophagy adaptor protein), which can stabilize Nrf2. By utilizing OncoDB online database, we found a positive correlation among c-Met, Rubicon, p62 and Nrf2 in renal cancer. Interestingly, the combination treatment significantly downregulated Rubicon, p62 and Nrf2 in RCC cells. In a tumor xenograft model, this combination treatment markedly inhibited renal tumor growth in vivo; and it is associated with decreased expression of Rubicon, p62, HO-1 and vessel density in the tumor tissues. Together, cabozantinib + Honokiol combination can significantly inhibit c-Met-induced and Nrf2-mediated anti-oxidant pathway in renal cancer cells to promote increased oxidative stress and tumor cell death.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Heme Oxygenase-1; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Reactive Oxygen Species; Signal Transduction

Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapy is utilized as a first-line systemic treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, evidence supporting the use of cabozantinib after IO combination therapy is lacking. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received second-line cabozantinib after IO combination therapy using the Japanese Urological Oncology Group (JUOG) database. In total, 254 patients were enrolled in the JUOG global study, and 118 patients who received second-line cabozantinib comprised the study cohort. The objective response rate, disease control rate, second-line cabozantinib progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival from second-line for overall were 32%, 75%, 10.5 months, and not reached, respectively, for first-line IO-IO therapy were 37%, 77%, 11.1 months, and not reached, respectively, versus 24%, 71%, 8.3 months, and not reached, respectively, for first-line IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. In univariate and multivariate analyses, discontinuation of first-line treatment because of progressive disease and liver metastasis were independent risk factors for PFS. All-grade adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, and grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 28% of patients. Second line-cabozantinib after first-line IO combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma was expected to be effective after either IO-IO or IO-TKI treatment and feasible in real-world practice.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; East Asian People; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies

Cabozantinib, a potent multityrosine kinases inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated overall survival (OS) benefit over everolimus in patients previously treated with VEGFR TKI for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The efficacy of systemic treatments after cabozantinib failure has not been investigated.. We conducted a retrospective study on patients receiving systemic treatment after cabozantinib failure in heavily pretreated patient with mRCC. We assessed Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), OS and objective response rate (ORR).. Among 150 patients treated with cabozantinib in our institution, 56 (37.3%) received subsequent systemic therapy and were eligible for the analysis. IMDC prognostic group was good, intermediate and poor in 11 (19.6%), 24 (42.9%) and 11 (19.6%) patients, respectively. Cabozantinib was administered mainly as a second (41.1%), or third (33.9%) line treatment. axitinib or immune-checkpoint inhibitors were the subsequent treatment in 18 (34.8%) patients for each everolimus (n:16, 28.6%), other angiogenesis inhibitors (n:4, 7.1%) TTF and OS from subsequent systemic therapy after cabozantinib failure were 2.8 months (95%CI 1.9-3.7) and 7.7 months (95%CI 4.4-10.8), respectively. ORR was 8.7% and 2 patients with axitinib and 2 patients treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors achieved a partial response.. Overall, activity of systemic therapies after cabozantinib was limited.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Cabozantinib improves survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after prior antiangiogenics. The best treatment at disease progression (PD) is unknown. Being also a AXL/MET inhibitor, involved in acquired resistance, we hypothesized a prolonged tumor growth control in patients continuing cabozantinib despite PD.. This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients receiving cabozantinib after the first line between 2014 and 2020. We compared patients maintaining cabozantinib after first PD due to clinical benefit and good tolerability with those who changed therapy. The postprogression survival (PPS) of both was our primary endpoint.. We analyzed 89 patients: 45 received cabozantinib beyond PD and 44 switched therapy. 40.4%, 31.5%, and 28.1% of patients received 1, 2, or >2 prior treatment, respectively. 84.3% were intermediate-poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database risk. Patients continuing cabozantinib showed a higher response rate to cabozantinib before PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and were more heavily pretreated. Continuing cabozantinib showed a significantly longer PPS compared with switching therapy (median PPS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.011).. We observed longer PPS in patients continuing cabozantinib beyond PD, suggesting that this could be an effective option.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Cabozantinib monotherapy is approved in the UK for patients with treatment-naïve intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), or patients who received prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy. Data are limited on the real-world use of cabozantinib for aRCC.. CERES (NCT03696407) was a retrospective study of patients with aRCC who received cabozantinib through the UK managed access programme (MAP; August 2016-July 2017), at which time cabozantinib had European regulatory approval for second- or later-line use only. The study objectives were to characterize aRCC treatment patterns and evaluate cabozantinib effectiveness. Outcomes were stratified by cabozantinib treatment line, MAP treatment date (months 0-7 vs. 8-12) and (post hoc) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; ≥ 6 vs. < 6).. Of 100 patients included, 99% had stage IV disease, 63% had a CCI ≥ 6 and 81% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1. Median (range) duration of follow-up was 10.8 (0.4-33.5) months. Cabozantinib was administered as second-line, third-line and fourth- or later-line in 41%, 31% and 28% of patients, respectively. Most patients (84%) initiated cabozantinib at 60 mg. Average (range) cabozantinib dose was 45.5 (19.6-59.8) mg/day; 66% of patients had ≥ 1 dose reduction. Disease progression was the most common reason for discontinuation (65.1%). Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.01 (5.16-7.85) and 10.84 (7.92-16.85) months, respectively. Overall response rate was 34.5%; disease control rate 70.1% and duration of response 6.9 (1.8-26.9) months. No significant differences in survival estimates were observed between treatment line or treatment date subgroups. Total CCI score ≤ 6 (vs. > 6) was associated with prolonged median PFS and OS.. Cabozantinib demonstrated clinical activity in this UK real-world aRCC population. The results provide a benchmark for future real-world studies in aRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; United Kingdom; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Ulcer; Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous

Full dose cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 60 mg, but adverse events (AEs) may require dose reductions. Limited data exist comparing efficacy among cabozantinib doses. We compared AEs and clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with full vs. reduced starting cabozantinib dose.. We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib at Winship Cancer Institute from 2016 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response (OR) rate measured clinical outcomes. AEs were collected from clinic notes and the most common were hypertension, mucositis/hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), or gastrointestinal toxicity. Univariate analysis (UVA) between starting doses and AEs with clinical outcomes was performed using logistic regression model. Multivariable analysis was also performed using Cox proportional hazard model.. Most patients were men (71%) with clear-cell RCC (72%). The majority were IMDC intermediate (58%) or poor (35%) risk. One third received first-line cabozantinib and 64% had ≥3 baseline metastatic sites. Most patients (68%) required dose reduction from 60 mg or started at reduced dose without escalation. Reduced dose patients were more likely to have ≥3 distant metastatic sites (70% vs. 58%) and ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy (50% vs. 40%) compared to full dose patients. UVA revealed a trend towards shorter OS (HR: 1.78, P = .095), PFS (HR: 1.50, P = .107), and lower chance of OR (HR:0.42, P = .149) among reduced dose patients. This trend did not hold in Multivariable analysis (OS HR: 1.20, P = .636; PFS HR: 1.23, P = .4662). Mucositis/HFSR and hypertension were significantly associated with improved outcomes in UVA.. Although we found a trend favoring full dose cabozantinib, this is likely due to worse baseline disease characteristics among patients starting on a reduced dose. Hypertension and mucositis/HFSR may be associated with improved outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Mucositis; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

A benefit:risk assessment for a less-frequent nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks + cabozantinib 40 mg every day dosing regimen was predicted using modeling and simulation of clinical trial data from nivolumab monotherapy studies and from the nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks + cabozantinib 40 mg every day dosing regimen, which demonstrated clinical benefit versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial (NCT03141177).. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted using nivolumab monotherapy data in previously treated aRCC and data from CheckMate 9ER to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥2 immune-mediated adverse events (IMAE).. Nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks + cabozantinib versus nivolumab monotherapy showed improvement in PFS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47), OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.85), and increased risk of grade ≥2 IMAEs (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.79-2.67). Nivolumab exposure was not a predictor of PFS/OS or grade ≥2 IMAEs. Lower nivolumab clearance, male sex, higher baseline bodyweight, and Karnofsky performance (100) were each associated with PFS/OS improvements. Region and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor score were negative OS predictors. Age, baseline albumin, and programmed death ligand 1 status were not significant PFS/OS predictors. Cabozantinib was a significant grade ≥2 IMAE predictor, driven by diarrhea and hepatic events. Model-predicted PFS/OS and grade ≥2 IMAE rates were similar (<2.5% difference) for nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks + cabozantinib and 480 mg every 4 weeks + cabozantinib.. Comparable benefit:risk was predicted for nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks + cabozantinib and nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks + cabozantinib.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Clinical evidence supports the combination of cabozantinib with an immune checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) and suggests a synergistic antitumour activity of this combination. Nevertheless, the biological basis of this synergy is not fully characterized. We studied the mechanisms underpinning the potential synergism of cabozantinib combined with a PD1 inhibitor in mccRCC and delved into cabozantinib monotherapy properties supporting its role to partner these combinations. To model physiological drug action, we used a machine learning-based technology known as Therapeutic Performance Mapping Systems, applying two approaches: Artificial Neural Networks and Sampling Methods. We found that the combined therapy was predicted to exert a wide therapeutic action in the tumour and the microenvironment. Cabozantinib may enhance the effects of PD1 inhibitors on immunosurveillance by modulating the innate and adaptive immune system, through the inhibition of VEGF-VEGFR and Gas6-AXL/TYRO3/MER (TAM) axes, while the PD1 inhibitors may boost the antiangiogenic and pro-apoptotic effects of cabozantinib by modulating angiogenesis and T-cell cytotoxicity. Cabozantinib alone was predicted to restore cellular adhesion and hamper tumour proliferation and invasion. These data provide a biological rationale and further support for cabozantinib plus PD1 inhibitor combination and may guide future nonclinical and clinical research.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Machine Learning; Pyridines; Tumor Microenvironment; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Topics: Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in specific mRCC subpopulations.. We retrospectively collected data from 11 centers from Italy, Spain and US. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses.. We collected data from 343 patients with mRCC, 123 (36%) treated with cabozantinib and 220 (64%) with nivolumab. The median OS resulted longer, but not statistically significant, with nivolumab in patients aged >70 years (21.4 vs. 15.4 months, P = .746), treated with first-line pazopanib (26.8 vs. 11.6 months, P = .450), or with good (47.0 vs. 15.5 months, P = .285) or intermediate-risk criteria (14.4 vs. 11.0 months, P = .357), while it was longer, but even not statistically significant, for cabozantinib in patients who received previous sunitinib (25.7 vs. 21.7 months, P = .638) or with bone metastases (28.4 vs. 24.4 months, P = .871). The median PFS was significantly longer with cabozantinib in patients with clear cell histology (7.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = .026) and in patients with good risk features (12.3 vs. 5.7 months, P = .022).. Nivolumab and cabozantinib resulted active in mRCC patients, showing distinct results when stratified into clinico-pathological features.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Nivolumab and cabozantinib are currently approved agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but there are no data available for patients progressing to both treatments. The aim of this study was to compare active therapeutic options and best supportive care (BSC) after progression to nivolumab and cabozantinib in mRCC.. In this retrospective study, we selected 50 patients from eight Italian centers. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall survival (OS) of patients on active treatment versus BSC. Secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The efficacy of active therapy was also investigated.. After progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib, 57.1% of patients were given active treatment (mainly everolimus and sorafenib) while 42.9% received BSC. The median OS was 13 months (95% CI: 4-NR) in actively treated patients and 3 months (95% CI: 2-4) in BSC patients (p = 0.001). Patients treated with sorafenib had better disease control than those treated with everolimus (stable disease: 71.4% vs. 16.7%, progression disease: 14.3% vs. 58.3%; p = 0.03), with no significant differences in PFS (5 and 3 months, 95% CI: 1-6 vs. 2-5; p = 0.6) and OS (12 and 4 months, 95% CI: 3-NR vs. 2-NR; p = 0.2).. After treatment with both nivolumab and cabozantinib, the choice of a safe active systemic therapy offered better outcomes than BSC.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Sorafenib

Metastatic collecting duct carcinoma (mCDC) is a rare type of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ncRCC) with poor prognosis and no standard treatments. Despite retrospective series that have documented the benefit of cabozantinib in ncRCC, no prospective trials have evaluated this treatment in mCDC.. To determine whether cabozantinib is an active treatment in patients with mCDC.. The caBozantinib in cOllectiNg ductS Renal Cell cArcInoma (BONSAI) trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial carried out between January 2018 and November 2020 at a single academic center with data cut off in September 2021 on behalf of the the Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO 2). Eligible patients had histologic diagnosis of centrally confirmed mCDC with measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). In total, 25 patients were screened.. Patients received cabozantinib, 60 mg orally once daily, until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent.. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1.. At data cut off, of 25 patients enrolled, 23 started treatment because 2 were excluded after failing the screening process at pathologic review. The median follow-up cannot be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator. The median time to censoring was 11 months (95% CI, 0-22 months). Median (range) age was 66 (53-74) years. As best overall response, 3 patients presented stable disease, 1 patient achieved a complete response, and 7 a partial response. The ORR was 35% (95% CI, 16%-57%). The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI, 3-13 months). The median OS was 7 months (95% CI, 3-31 months). All patients reported at least 1 grade (G) 1 to 2 adverse event (AE). The most common G1 to G2 AEs were fatigue (14 [60%]), anorexia (9 [39%]), hand-foot syndrome (7 [30%]), hypothyroidism (7 [30%]), mucositis (7 [30%]), diarrhea (5 [22%]), and hypertension (3 [13%]). Six G3 AEs were reported: 2 arterial hyperthension, 1 pulmonary thromboembolism, 1 bleeding, and 2 fatigue. There were no permanent discontinuations from the study owing to AEs. Four patients (17%) required dose reduction to 40 mg, and 4 (17%) required a transitory interruption to manage toxic effects.. The study met the ORR primary end point, showing encouraging efficacy of cabozantinib in untreated patients with mCDC. Further investigations to advance the molecular understanding of this tumor are ongoing.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03354884.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Fatigue; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Genomics; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Nivolumab and cabozantinib are approved agents in mRCC patients after sunitinib/pazopanib (TKI) failure. However, the optimal sequence, cabozantinib then nivolumab (CN) or nivolumab then cabozantinib (NC), is still unknown. The CABIR study aimed to identify the optimal sequence between CN and NC after frontline VEGFR-TKI. In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected data from mRCC pts receiving CN or NC, after frontline VEGFR-TKI. A propensity score (PrS) was calculated to manage bias selection, and sequence comparisons were carried out with a cox model on a matched sample 1:1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second line to progression in third line (PFS

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

The efficacy of combined immunotherapy for papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) based on prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in several clinical trials remains unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with pRCC and those with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).. This retrospective study included 27 patients with metastatic RCC who received cabozantinib as second-line or later therapy between June 2020 and October 2021. Objective response, PFS, and toxicity were compared between the ccRCC and pRCC groups.. Out of 27 patients, seven and 20 were diagnosed with pRCC and ccRCC, respectively. Out of the seven patients with pRCC, cabozantinib was used as second-line treatment in four patients and as third-line treatment in three patients, and all seven patients had had prior immunotherapy. One and two patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively; four patients had stable disease, and none had progressive disease. The rates of objective response (43% vs. 30%, p=0.65) and disease control (100% vs. 85%, p=0.54) were similarly high in patients with pRCC and ccRCC. Changes in the target lesions were -19% and -10% (p=0.11), respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.1 months, the median PFS tended to be longer in patients with pRCC than in those with ccRCC (not reached vs. 10.7 months, p=0.12). Discontinuation due to toxicity was observed in four (57%) patients with pRCC and 10 (50%) patients with ccRCC.. Cabozantinib is effective for pRCC, similar to ccRCC. This information may help physicians to select treatment options for pRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Novel immunotherapy-based combination treatments have drastically improved clinical outcomes for previously untreated patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). This study aimed to assess the temporal trends in grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) rates and associated costs of nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination therapy versus sunitinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with aRCC.. Individual patient data from the CheckMate 9ER trial (nivolumab plus cabozantinib: N = 320; sunitinib: N = 320) were used to calculate the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs. AE unit costs were obtained from the United States (US) 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and inflated to 2020 US dollars. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause and treatment-related grade 3/4 AE costs over 18-months, temporal trends, and top drivers of AE costs were evaluated in both treatment arms.. Overall, the proportion of patients experiencing grade 3/4 AEs decreased over time, with the highest rates observed in the first 3 months for the nivolumab plus cabozantinib and sunitinib arms. Compared with sunitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with consistently lower average all-cause AE costs PPPM [month 3: $2021 vs. $3097 (p < 0.05); month 6: $1653 vs. $2418 (p < 0.05); month 12: $1450 vs. $1935 (p > 0.05); month 18: $1337 vs. $1755 (p > 0.05)]. Over 18 months, metabolism and nutrition disorders ($244), laboratory abnormalities ($182), and general disorders and administration site conditions ($122) were the costliest all-cause PPPM AE categories in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib arm, and laboratory abnormalities ($443), blood and lymphatic system disorders ($254), and metabolism and nutrition disorders ($177) were the costliest in the sunitinib arm. Trends of treatment-related AE costs were consistent with all-cause AE costs.. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib was associated with lower costs of grade 3/4 AE management PPPM than sunitinib, which accumulated over the 18-month study period.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Nutrition Disorders; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials.. We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system.. We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017-2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region.. We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80.. In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common cancer in the USA. Up to 30% of patients with RCC are in an advanced stage of disease at diagnosis. RCC is difficult to cure, with an 11% chance of survival after 5 years for patients with advanced RCC. A recent clinical study showed that nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NC) had a greater benefit in patients with advanced RCC than sunitinib. The US FDA approved NC for advanced RCC, but NC is relatively expensive. This study explored the cost–effectiveness of NC for advanced RCC versus sunitinib for a US payer using two cost–effectiveness models developed based on the results of the aforementioned clinical study. The results showed that to gain an additional year in perfect health, NC costs an average of US$555,663 or $531,748 more versus sunitinib, which is more than a US payer is willing to pay for an additional year in perfect health ($150,000). Therefore, NC for advanced RCC is not cost-effective versus sunitinib for a US payer at current prices.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have become the first-line standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but their activity on the primary tumor is still one of the most debated issues.. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the primary tumor's response to first-line therapy with cabozantinib or nivolumab+ipilimumab, and its correlation with metastatic response and with patient outcomes.. Sixty-seven mRCC patients met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis (30 treated with cabozantinib and 37 with nivolumab+ipilimumab). In the overall population, the primary tumor control rate (PTCR) was 90.9%; no complete responses (CR) were achieved. A significant correlation was found between the baseline size of the primary tumor's longest diameter and its response according to RECIST v1.1 criteria at the time of the second radiological assessment (rs = -0.351; P = .049). Moreover, a significant correlation between the type of primary tumor response and the response of the metastases was observed in the overall population (rs = 0.50; two-sided P < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between primary tumor response and 1-year survival rate (P = .002), even when adjusted for the IMDC prognostic group and type of therapy (HR = 8.70; 95%CI, 2.52-30.05; P = .001).. Extension of the primary tumor did not affect patient survival, while its response was significantly related to the response on metastatic disease and survival. No significant differences in terms of primary tumor shrinkage were identified between treatment with nivolumab+ipilimumab or cabozantinib in this cohort.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Prognosis; Pyridines

Cabozantinib, a standard of care metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), may be associated with weight and muscle loss. These effects of new generation VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor on muscle mass loss are poorly described.. All cabozantinib-treated mRCC patients from January 2014 to February 2019 in our institution were included. Clinical data including weight were collected during therapy. Computed tomography images were centrally reviewed for response assessment, and axial sections at the third lumbar vertebrae were used to measure the total muscle area. Toxicities and cabozantinib outcomes were evaluated. Co-primary endpoints included skeletal muscle loss and weight loss (WL), longitudinally evaluated during treatment. WL has been classified according to CTCAEv5.0: Grade 1 (loss of 5 to <10% of baseline body weight), Grade 2 (loss of 10% to <20% of baseline body weight), and Grades 3-4 (loss >20% of baseline body weight).. We report a high incidence of grades 3-4 WL, fourth times higher than reported in prior pivotal trials, and half of the patients developed sarcopenia while on cabozantinib treatment. Weight and muscle mass loss with cabozantinib are underreported and may require further investigations and early management.

Topics: Anilides; Body Weight; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Sarcopenia

Kinase activity is frequently altered in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are part of the standard treatment strategy in patients with metastatic disease. However, there are still no established biomarkers to predict clinical benefits of a specific TKI. Here, we performed protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) profiling using PamChip

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Nerve Growth Factors; Phenylurea Compounds; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phosphatidylinositols; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; src-Family Kinases; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

In the Checkmate9ER trial, first-line treatment with nivolumab combined with cabozantinib (NI + CA) has shown efficacy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the health and economic outcomes of NI + CA in China.. Clinical efficacy data were derived from pivotal phase III CheckMate 9ER trial. A three-state partitioned survival model was established based on disease progression. Progression-free survival and overall survival of NI + CA vs. sunitinib were fitted with log-logistic and log-normal distributions, respectively. Mixture cure, non-mixture cure, and Royston/Parmar spline models were used to evaluate model robustness. The results derived the computational cost from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. The primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total cost in US dollars, as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at the willingness-to-pay threshold in China. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also used to assess the robustness of the model.. In the base-case analysis result, 0.86 additional QALYs could be obtained in the NI+CA (3.84 QALYs) versus the sunitinib strategy (2.97 QALYs). The ICER of NI+CA compared with the sunitinib strategy was US$292,945 per QALY. The ICER value in the NI+CA strategy was higher than the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold of US$38,024 per QALY. Although NI+CA can improve long-term patient survival significantly over sunitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, it is unlikely to be cost-effective due to high cost. The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed that drug cost, health utility value at the stage of disease progression, and subsequent treatment proportion had a greater impact on the stability of ICER values.. Nivolumab combined with cabozantinib can prolong the life of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and improve their quality of life, but there is a corresponding increase in medical cost. The NI + CA strategy is unlikely to be considered cost-effective in the treatment of advanced RCC from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Sunitinib

Patients with high-risk non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are at risk of metastatic relapse following nephrectomy. Cabozantinib (CZ), a potent multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, interferes with angiogenesis and immunosuppression associated with surgery-induced metastasis. Here, we explored the therapeutic potential of CZ-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (CZ-PLGA-NPs) as an adjuvant strategy for targeting post-nephrectomy metastasis. A clinically relevant subline recapitulating post-nephrectomy lung metastasis of high-risk human RCC, namely Renca-SRLu5-Luc, was established through in vivo serial selection of luciferase-expressing murine RCC Renca-Luc cells. CZ was encapsulated into PLGA-NPs via the conventional single emulsion technique. The multifaceted preclinical antimetastatic efficacy of CZ-PLGA-NPs was assessed in Renca-SRLu5-Luc cells. CZ-PLGA-NPs with a smooth surface displayed desirable physicochemical properties, good CZ encapsulation efficiency, as well as controlled and sustained CZ release. CZ-PLGA-NPs exhibited remarkable dose-dependent toxicity against Renca-SRLu5-Luc cells by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. CZ-PLGA-NPs attenuated in vitro colony formation, migration, and invasion by abrogating AKT and ERK1/2 activation. An intravenous injection of CZ-PLGA-NPs markedly reduced lung metastatic burden and prolonged lifespan with favorable safety in the Renca-SRLu5-Luc experimental lung metastasis model. The novel CZ-PLGA-NPs system with multifaceted antimetastatic effects and alleviating off-target toxicity potential is a promising adjunctive agent for patients with surgically resected high-risk RCC.

Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Carriers; Emulsions; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lactic Acid; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Nanoparticles; Particle Size; Polyglycolic Acid; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze treatment outcomes and tolerance in patients in whom cabozantinib was used after previous targeted therapy.. Cabozantinib was administered in dose 60 mg/day, a subset of patients received initial dose of 40 mg/day. The treatment was administered until to progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT scans were assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 and toxicity of treatment was assessed based on the CTCAE (version 4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment outcomes (PFS, OS) by Cox regression analysis. All statistics were evaluated at the significance level alpha = 0.05.. 54 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were evaluated. Median PFS in all patients treated with cabozantinib was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.3 - 13.3). One-year survival was 85.2% (95% CI 72.9 - 93.4%). Treatment response was observed in 45.9% of cases, including one complete remission. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that presence of subsequent treatment was the only factor with a significant effect on OS (P=0.008). Adverse events occurred in 88.9% of patients, grade 3 - 4 in 46.3%.. The analysis of our cohort of patients treated with cabozantinib in the second or higher lines of treatment showed that cabozantinib represents an effective and safe therapy and contributes to longer survival of our mRCC patients.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Czech Republic; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Cabozantinib (CAB) is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against MET, VEGFR2, and AXL, among others. This drug is considered to exert excellent antitumor effects by inhibiting these targets simultaneously. Significant improvement in the primary endpoint (overall survival or PFS) were observed in patients on CAB in comparison with controls in a phase-III study in patients with renal cell carcinoma, progressed after treatment with anti-angiogenic agents, and in another phase-III study in patients with previously treated, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. These results led to the approval of CAB in Japan in 2020 as a therapeutic agent for unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma progressed after cancer chemotherapy, under the trade name of CABOMETYX

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Approval; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

In 2 patients with postoperative lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma, we administered cabozantinib at a starting dose of 40 mg. The side effects were proteinuria(Grade 2), hand-foot syndrome(Grade 2), and hypertension(Grade 3), which subsided following dose reduction and drug suspension. We believe that a low starting dose of cabozantinib might be a suitable regimen for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to CheckMate 9ER study.. A Markov model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of nivolumab plus cabozantinib with those of sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced RCC. Primary outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Model uncertainty was assessed in univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. The total cost per patient was $681,425 for nivolumab plus cabozantinib and $256,302 for sunitinib. The incremental QALY for nivolumab plus cabozantinib was 0.49 compared with sunitinib. The ICER for nivolumab plus cabozantinib was $863,720 per QALY gained versus sunitinib. The results remained robust in univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. On the basis of a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000, nivolumab plus cabozantinib was not cost-effective under current drug pricing in the first-line treatment of advanced RCC from a US payer's perspective.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; United States

Determining the most appropriate management strategy for patients with large tumor masses is a very challenging issue. Unconventional radiotherapy modalities, such as spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), are associated with dramatic responses. Recent studies have suggested that systemic immune activation may be triggered by SFRT delivery to primary tumor lesion. This report describes the case of a patient treated with a novel form of immune-sparing partially ablative irradiation (ISPART) for a bulky peritoneal metastasis from renal cell cancer, refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab) as third-line therapy after sequential therapy with sunitinib and cabozantinib. The observed response suggests that there may be a synergistic effect between ISPART and immunotherapy. This case report supports the inclusion of ISPART in patients presenting with bulky lesions treated with checkpoint inhibitors .. Lay abstract Managing large tumor masses is a very challenging issue. In recent years, radiotherapy methods have been linked with good responses, which may be due to the activation of immune mechanisms. We describe the case of a patient with a large tumor mass from renal cell cancer. The patient had already been treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, after treatment with sunitinib and cabozantinib, along with radiotherapy. The results suggest that radiotherapy together with immunotherapy is very effective in enhancing immune response.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been underrepresented in clinical trials, and effective systemic therapy is lacking. Cabozantinib shows robust clinical activity in metastatic RCC, but its effect on brain metastases remains unclear.. To assess the clinical activity and toxic effects of cabozantinib to treat brain metastases in patients with metastatic RCC.. This retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic RCC and brain metastases treated in 15 international institutions (US, Belgium, France, and Spain) between January 2014 and October 2020. Cohort A comprised patients with progressing brain metastases without concomitant brain-directed local therapy, and cohort B comprised patients with stable or progressing brain metastases concomitantly treated by brain-directed local therapy.. Receipt of cabozantinib monotherapy at any line of treatment.. Intracranial radiological response rate by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and toxic effects of cabozantinib.. Of the 88 patients with brain metastases from RCC included in the study, 33 (38%) were in cohort A and 55 (62%) were in cohort B; the majority of patients were men (n = 69; 78%), and the median age at cabozantinib initiation was 61 years (range, 34-81 years). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-74 months). The intracranial response rate was 55% (95% CI, 36%-73%) and 47% (95% CI, 33%-61%) in cohorts A and B, respectively. In cohort A, the extracranial response rate was 48% (95% CI, 31%-66%), median time to treatment failure was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.9-12.3 months), and median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI, 9.0-30.0 months). In cohort B, the extracranial response rate was 38% (95% CI, 25%-52%), time to treatment failure was 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-13.2 months), and median overall survival was 16 months (95% CI, 12.0-21.9 months). Cabozantinib was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxic effects or neurological adverse events reported. No treatment-related deaths were observed.. In this cohort study, cabozantinib showed considerable intracranial activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with RCC and brain metastases. Support of prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of cabozantinib for brain metastases in patients with RCC is critical.

Topics: Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Dysregulated metabolism is a hallmark of cancer that manifests through alterations in bioenergetic and biosynthetic pathways to enable tumor cell proliferation and survival. Tumor cells exhibit high rates of glycolysis, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect, and an increase in glutamine consumption to support the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors express high levels of glutaminase (GLS), the enzyme required for the first step in metabolic conversion of glutamine to glutamate and the entry of glutamine into the TCA cycle. We found that RCC cells are highly dependent on glutamine for proliferation, and this dependence strongly correlated with sensitivity to telaglenstat (CB-839), an investigational, first-in-class, selective, orally bioavailable GLS inhibitor. Metabolic profiling of RCC cell lines treated with telaglenastat revealed a decrease in glutamine consumption, which was concomitant with a decrease in the production of glutamate and other glutamine-derived metabolites, consistent with GLS inhibition. Treatment of RCC cells with signal transduction inhibitors everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) or cabozantinib (VEGFR/MET/AXL inhibitor) in combination with telaglenastat resulted in decreased consumption of both glucose and glutamine and synergistic anti-proliferative effects. Treatment of mice bearing Caki-1 RCC xenograft tumors with cabozantinib plus telaglenastat resulted in reduced tumor growth compared to either agent alone. Enhanced anti-tumor activity was also observed with the combination of everolimus plus telaglenastat. Collectively, our results demonstrate potent, synergistic, anti-tumor activity of telaglenastat plus signal transduction inhibitors cabozantinib or everolimus via a mechanism involving dual inhibition of glucose and glutamine consumption.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Benzeneacetamides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Drug Synergism; Everolimus; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glucose; Glutaminase; Glutamine; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Mice; Pyridines; Signal Transduction; Thiadiazoles; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Current standard treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that inhibit angiogenesis. Cabozantinib is a multi TKI used for the treatment of mRCC in the first- and second-line setting.. The aim of this study was the final analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with cabozantinib after previous targeted therapy.. A total of 54 patients with mRCC from four oncology centers in the Czech Republic were evaluated retrospectively; the median follow-up was 18.5 months. Cabozantinib was administered in a dose of 60mg/day, a subset of patients received an initial dose of 40mg/day. The treatment was administered until the progression. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment outcomes (PFS, OS) by regression analysis. All statistics were evaluated at the significance level α = 0.05.. The median PFS in all patients was 9.3 months (95% CI 7.2 - 11.4). The median OS in all patients was 21.9 months (95% CI 15.5 - 28.4). The median PFS in patients with bone metastases was not statistically significantly different compared with patients without bone metastases (9.3 vs 8.7 months, P = 0.53). The median OS in patients with bone metastases was statistically significantly shorter compared with patients without bone metastases (17.7 vs 26.8 months, P = 0.021). A treatment response was observed in 40.7 % of cases, including one complete remission. The regression analysis demonstrated a significant effect on OS in patients with the presence of subsequent treatment (P = 0.001), patients with treatment duration of first line therapy 6 months (P = 0.019) and 12 months (P = 0.003) and in patients without bone metastases (P = 0.021).. Our final analysis of patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib after previous targeted therapy confirmed its effectiveness.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Cancer Care Facilities; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Czech Republic; Data Analysis; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common genitourinary cancer in the USA. Despite recent advances in the treatment for advanced and metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the 5-year relative survival rate for the distant disease remains at 12%. Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which is one of the first-line therapies approved to treat advanced ccRCC as a single agent, is now being investigated as a combination therapy with newer immunotherapeutic agents. However, not much is known about how cabozantinib modulates the immune system. Here, we present a high throughput tri-culture model that incorporates cancer cells, endothelial cells, and patient-derived immune cells to study the effect of immune cells from patients with ccRCC on angiogenesis and cabozantinib resistance. We show that circulating immune cells from patients with ccRCC induce cabozantinib resistance via increased secretion of a set of pro-angiogenic factors. Using multivariate partial least square regression modeling, we identified CD4+ T cell subsets that are correlated with cabozantinib resistance and report the changes in the frequency of these populations in ccRCC patients who are undergoing cabozantinib therapy. These findings provide a potential set of biomarkers that should be further investigated in the current TKI-immunotherapy combination clinical trials to improve personalized treatments for patients with ccRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Endothelial Cells; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Intratumoral immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) represents a potential mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance in solid tumors. By promoting TAM and MDSC infiltration, IL1β may drive adaptive and innate immune resistance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and in other tumor types.. Using the RENCA model of RCC, we evaluated clinically relevant combinations of anti-IL1β plus either anti-PD-1 or the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), cabozantinib. We performed comprehensive immune profiling of established RENCA tumors via multiparameter flow cytometry, tumor cytokine profiling, and single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Similar analyses were extended to the MC38 tumor model.. Analyses via multiparameter flow cytometry, tumor cytokine profiling, and single-cell RNA-seq showed that anti-IL1β reduces infiltration of polymorphonuclear MDSCs and TAMs. Combination treatment with anti-IL1β plus anti-PD-1 or cabozantinib showed increased antitumor activity that was associated with decreases in immunosuppressive MDSCs and increases in M1-like TAMs.. Single-cell RNA-seq analyses show that IL1β blockade and ICI or TKI remodel the myeloid compartment through nonredundant, relatively T-cell-independent mechanisms. IL1β is an upstream mediator of adaptive myeloid resistance and represents a potential target for kidney cancer immunotherapy.

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Interleukin-1beta; Kidney Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells; Pyridines; RNA-Seq; Single-Cell Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden; Tumor-Associated Macrophages

Cabozantinib strongly inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in vitro. We aimed to evaluate its effect on bone turnover markers (BTMs) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.. This is a monocentric prospective study on patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib between October 2016 and July 2018. We collected blood samples at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. We compared sets of data obtained from plasma samples in the whole population with unpaired 2-tailed Student. Our analysis included 39 patients. At month 3, the mean C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx) and the mean N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (PINP) levels were significantly decreased in the whole population (. Cabozantinib significantly reduced bone resorption as demonstrated by the decrease of CTx and showed a transient secondary increase of PTH.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Bone and Bones; Bone Neoplasms; Bone Remodeling; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridines

We report a case using combination cabozantinib plus nivolumab to salvage disease control in a patient with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The patient had previously experienced disease progression from high-dose interleukin-2, sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, and nivolumab, all given sequentially. Combination cabozantinib plus nivolumab resulted in 22 months of disease control. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors including cabozantinib have immunomodulatory effects when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, with multiple ongoing phase III trials exploring the cabozantinib plus nivolumab combination in the first-line setting. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of progression on nivolumab and cabozantinib when given as sequential monotherapies but stable disease on combination cabozantinib plus nivolumab.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Eruptions; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous

Longer follow-up and new trial data from phase 3 randomised controlled trials investigating immune checkpoint blockade (PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1) in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have recently become available. The CheckMate 9ER trial demonstrated an improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit for the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab. A Keynote-426 update demonstrated an ongoing OS benefit for pembrolizumab plus axitinib in the intention-to-treat population, with a PFS benefit seen across all International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) subgroups, while an update of CheckMate 214 confirmed the long-term benefit of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in IMDC intermediate and poor risk patients. The RCC Guidelines Panel continues to recommend these tyrosine kinase inhibitors + immunotherapy (IO) combination across IMDC risk groups in advanced first-line RCC and dual immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab in IMDC intermediate and poor risk. PATIENT SUMMARY: New data from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced kidney cancer confirm a survival benefit with the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab and pembrolizumab plus axitinib and ipilimumab plus nivolumab. These combination therapies are recommended as first-line treatment for advanced kidney cancer.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Sunitinib; Urology

Cabozantinib is approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) based on the METEOR and CABOSUN trials. However, real-world effectiveness and dosing patterns of cabozantinib are not well characterized.. Patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib between 2011 and 2019 were identified and stratified using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. First- (1L), second- (2L), third- (3L), and fourth-line (4L) overall response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Dose reduction rates and their association with TTF and OS were determined.. A total of 413 patients were identified. The ORRs across 1L to 4L were 32%, 26%, 25%, and 29%, respectively, and the median TTF rates were 8.3, 7.3, 7.0, and 8.0 months, respectively. The median OS (mOS) rates in 1L to 4L were 30.7, 17.8, 12.6, and 14.9 months, respectively. For patients treated with 1L PD(L)1 combination agent (n = 31), 2L cabozantinib had ORR of 22%, median TTF of 5.4 months, and mOS of 17.4 months. About 50% (129/258) of patients required dose reductions. The TTF and mOS were significantly longer for patients who required dose reduction vs. patients who did not, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.202-0.672, p < 0.01) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.215-0.980, p = 0.04), respectively. Limitations include the retrospective study design and the lack of central radiology review.. The ORR and TTF of cabozantinib were maintained from the 1L to 4L settings. Dose reductions due to toxicity were associated with improved TTF and OS. Cabozantinib has clinical activity after 1L Immuno-oncology combination agents.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 3% of all tumors. Over the last decades, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved owing to the approval of several drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) does not exceed 8 months with the available drugs in pretreated patients with mRCC. We present a case of a patient with a long-term response to fourth-line treatment with cabozantinib. Our patient obtained a PFS of 33 months, which is much higher than that reported in literature.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Survival Rate

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Medical Oncology; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Cabozantinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cabozantinib is a weak base that exhibits a pH-dependent solubility profile in vitro which raises concerns about its bioavailability in patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether PPI use has an impact on the efficacy, safety, and residual concentration (Ctrough) of cabozantinib in patients with mRCC.. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected electronic database of patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib at Gustave Roussy between February 2014 and December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and the Cox proportional-hazard model for uni- and multivariate analysis. In parallel, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study of cabozantinib in a distinct cohort of 50 mRCC patients, in which cabozantinib Ctrough was assayed using a validated tandem mass spectrometry-liquid chromatography method.. We identified 99 patients treated with cabozantinib, including 43 patients being PPI users. With a median follow-up of 30.3 months, PPI users showed similar progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes compared with PPI nonusers. Similarly, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the PPI users and nonusers, although PPI users required dose reductions more often. In the independent pharmacokinetic cohort, of whom 21 received PPI concomitantly, Ctrough was similar between the two groups.. In line with the pharmacologic data, the concomitant use of PPI does not significantly impact the efficacy or safety of cabozantinib in patients with mRCC.. Drug interactions, especially between targeted therapies and proton pump inhibitors (PPI), were shown to potentially impact the outcomes of cancer patients. Cabozantinib, a current therapeutic standard in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), exhibits a pH-dependent solubility profile, which raises concerns about its bioavailability in patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). At the present time, there is no evidence regarding the effect of PPIs on cabozantinib's efficacy and safety in patients with mRCC. This study found that the concomitant use of PPI during cabozantinib treatment in mRCC patients does not appear to impact the residual concentration, efficacy, and safety of cabozantinib in a real-life context.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Patient was a 73-year-old woman with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bone scan showed multifocal bone metastases. The patient received cabozantinib treatment for more than 1 year. On the follow-up bone scan, the previously biopsy-proven left pelvic bone lesion has improved, whereas the right maxillary lesion showed increased extent and intensity of abnormal radiotracer uptake. Given the different change pattern of these lesions, the right maxillary lesion was further evaluated. Biopsy results confirmed devitalized bone with bacterial colonies overgrowth and without tumor cell, suggestive of medication-related osteonecrosis.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Osteonecrosis; Pyridines; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines

The aim of our study was to collect data about of the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to enhance data about efficacy and safety of treatment beyond immune-oncology (IO).. A total of 162 eligible patients, progressing to IO, were enrolled from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro association. Baseline characteristics, outcome data and toxicities were retrospectively collected. Descriptive analysis was made using median values and ranges. Kaplan-Meier method and Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test were performed to compare differences between groups.. A total of 111 patients (68.5%) were treated after IO progression. In all, 51 patients (31.5%) did not receive further treatment for clinical deterioration. Median IO progression free survival (PFS) was 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-4.8). IO-PFS tends to be longer in patients reporting adverse events (AE) of any grade (5.03 [95% CI: 3.8-6.1] vs. 2.99 [95% CI: 2.4-3.5] months P=0.004). Subsequent therapies included cabozantinib (n=79, 48%), everolimus (n=11, 6.7%), and others (n=21, 12.9%).Median PFS post-IO was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1-7.8). Cabozantinib showed longer PFS compared with everolimus (7.6 mo [95% CI: 5.2-10.1] vs. 3.2 mo [95% CI: 1.8-4.5]) (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1026-0.7968) and other drugs (4.3 mo [95% CI: 1.3-7.4]) (hazard ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.35-1.23). All grade AE were reported in 83 patients (74%) and G3 to G4 AE in 39 patients (35%). Target therapies post-IO showed median overall survival of 14.7 months (95% CI: 0.3-21.4).. In our real world experience after progression to IO, vascular endotelial groth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, given to patients, proved to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a better outcome in terms of median PFS.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Italy; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Two separate antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) combinations are FDA-approved as front-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Little is known about off-protocol and post-front-line experience with combination TKI-IO approaches.. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mRCC patients who received combination TKI-IO post-first-line therapy between November 2015 and January 2019 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Chart review detailed patient characteristics, treatments, toxicity, and survival. Independent radiologists, blinded to clinical data, assessed best radiographic response using RECIST v1.1.. We identified 48 mRCC patients for inclusion: median age 65 years, 75.0% clear cell histology, 68.8% IMDC intermediate risk, and median two prior systemic therapies. TKI-IO combinations included nivolumab-cabozantinib (N +C; 24 patients), nivolumab-pazopanib (N+P; 13), nivolumab-axitinib (6), nivolumab-lenvatinib (2), and nivolumab-ipilimumab-cabozantinib (3). The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Response data were available in 45 patients: complete response (CR; n = 3, 6.7%), partial response (PR; 20, 44.4%), stable disease (SD; 19, 42.2%), and progressive disease (3, 6.7%). Overall response rate was 51% and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 93%. Only one patient had a grade ≥3 adverse event.. To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting off-label use of combination TKI-IO for mRCC. TKI-IO combinations, particularly N+P and N+C, are well tolerated and efficacious. Although further prospective research is essential, slow disease progression on IO or TKI monotherapy may be safely controlled with addition of either TKI or IO.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Cabozantinib is an effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) criteria is the gold standard for risk stratification in mRCC. We created a risk scoring system specific for mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib.. We conducted a retrospective review of 87 patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were used to measure clinical outcomes. Upon variable selection in multivariable analysis (MVA), elevated baseline monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), sarcomatoid histologic component, ECOG PS > 1, and absence of bone metastases were each assigned 1 point. A three-group risk scoring system was then created: low (score=0-1), intermediate (score=2), and high risk (score=3-4). The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analyses.. The median age was 62 years-old and the majority were males (71%) with clear-cell RCC (75%). Most (67%) received at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy. High risk and intermediate risk pts had significantly shorter OS (high risk HR: 13.84, p<0.001; intermediate risk HR: 3.50, p = 0.004) and PFS (high risk HR: 7.31, p<0.001; intermediate risk HR: 1.87, p = 0.053) compared to low risk patients in MVA.. RCC patients treated with cabozantinib may benefit from specific risk stratification criteria using RCC histology, ECOG PS, sites of metastatic disease, and MLR. These variables are easily accessible in the clinical setting and may be helpful to determine which mRCC patients may benefit from treatment with cabozantinib.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

The lack of effective treatment options for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (NCCRCC) is a critical unmet clinical need. Applying a high-throughput drug screen to multiple human kidney cancer cells, we identify the combination of the VEGFR-MET inhibitor cabozantinib and the SRC inhibitor dasatinib acts synergistically in cells to markedly reduce cell viability. Importantly, the combination is well tolerated and causes tumor regression

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Dasatinib; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Signal Transduction; src-Family Kinases

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines

Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation is a highly aggressive form of kidney cancer.. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features.. We retrospectively collected data from 16 worldwide centers. Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses.. We collected data from 66 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma receiving cabozantinib as second-line (51%) or third-line (49%) therapy. The median progression-free survival from the start of cabozantinib was 7.59 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.75-17.49) and was longer in male patients (8.81 vs 5.95 months, p = 0.042) and in patients without bone metastases (7.59 vs 5.11 months, p = 0.010); the median overall survival was 9.11 months (95% CI 7.13-23.80). At the multivariate analysis, female sex (hazard ratio = 1.81; 95% CI 1.02-3.37, p = 0.046), bone metastases (hazard ratio = 2.62; 95% CI 1.34-5.10, p = 0.005), and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria (hazard ratio = 3.04; 95% CI 1.54-5.99, p = 0.001) were significant predictors of worse overall survival.. Our data show that cabozantinib is active in pretreated patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Biomarkers are needed in this field to select patients for multi-kinase inhibitors or other options.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Differentiation; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

In the last decade, there have been substantial changes in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with combined regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) replacing targeted therapies. These combined regimens include the combination of cabozantinib plus nivolumab.. Here, we provide an overview of clinical trials evaluating the combination of cabozantinib and nivolumab and the current clinical data on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile.. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab and ipilimumab as well as the combination of a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor have shown to improve outcomes in phase III trials in comparison to sunitinib (axitinib plus pembrolizumab, axitinib plus avelumab, bevacizumab plus atezolizumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab). However, to date, there are no head-to-head trials comparing these new combination therapies and no biomarkers are available to guide the optimal choice of first line therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Despite first-line approval in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib is associated with frequent treatment-limiting side effects. Dose reductions in published trials of the drug and in clinical practice are commonplace. We analyzed our institution's real-world experience with cabozantinib dosing in patients with mRCC to assess strategies to improve tolerability and patient outcomes.. The purpose of our study is to retrospectively analyze dose intensity, tolerability, and duration of exposure in mRCC patients who received cabozantinib at our institution.. In this retrospective, single-center chart review, we identified 35 adult patients who received at least one cycle cabozantinib for mRCC during a two-year period. Dosing patterns were reviewed for each patient to allow calculation of median dose intensity and median duration of exposure.. The median dose intensity for cabozantinib was 55.4% and the median actual daily dose was 33.2 mg. Median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 10.4 months. Several alternative dosing strategies were employed with 60% of patients requiring at least one dose intervention to manage toxicities.. Patients in this analysis received a median actual daily dose of 33.4 mg, less than the reported median doses in the METEOR and CABOSUN trials. However, our median duration of cabozantinib treatment was 10.4 months compared to 8.3 months and 6.5 months in these respective trials. Further investigation is warranted to determine if alternative dosing strategies and lower median actual daily doses produce survival results comparable to published clinical trials.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, cardiac metastases are a rare and often a post-mortem finding. Clinical manifestations of cardiac metastases have a late onset and include pericardial effusions, heart failure and embolic phenomena. Treatment of cardiac metastasis is not yet standardized, and few data are available about the efficacy of TKI on treatment of cardiac metastases in mRCC patients. In this report, we describe the case of a 66-year-old male who presented with mRCC with lung and cardiac metastases treated with cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor that was administered in second line after disease progression with sunitinib. To date, there are no data about the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC with cardiac metastasis. In a real word analysis, cabozantinib demonstrated to be associated to a modest risk of developing left ventricular heart failure. It is unknown if this risk is higher in mRCC population with cardiac metastases. We report the first evidence of efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in cardiac mRCC patients, probably due to its specific inhibition of several molecular intracellular pathways. Additional molecular and clinical studies are needed before well tolerated and efficacy of cabozantinib treatment for these patients can be fully understood.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Heart Neoplasms; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines

Cabozantinib is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor recently approved in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) leading to frequent severe toxicities requiring empirical dose reduction. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could help to predict the risk for severe toxicities by quickly detecting overexposed patients followed by prospective adaptive dosing strategy. To achieve this goal, a simple and rapid assay to monitor cabozantinib plasma concentration was developed and validated. After a single precipitation step with 87% recovery, cabozantinib was assayed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (electrospray ionization interface) over a 25-5000 ng/ml range covering usual plasma levels in clinical setting. For cabozantinib and cabozantinib 2H4 used as internal standard, quantification was performed using the m/z 502 → m/z 323 and m/z 506 → m/z 323 transitions, respectively. Analytical runtime was 5 min. Both inter-days and intra-day accuracy and precision were <15%. When tested in routine clinical practice in a subset of mRCC patients treated with standard 60 mg quaque die (QD) dosing, the method proved to be fully adapted and neither analytical interferences nor matrix effect was observed. Results showed that cabozantinib trough levels were highly variable among patients (i.e., 973 ± 501 ng/ml, CV = 52%), calling for implementing TDM in patients with mRCC to monitor exposure levels and evaluate concentration-response relationship.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Linear Models; Mass Spectrometry; Pyridines; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity

We report a case of rapid evolution of polycystic liver disease in a 76-year-old patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who underwent treatment with numerous antineoplastic agents. The aim was to identify a causative etiology for these hepatic cysts of unclear origin. The cystic lesions of the patient were ultimately innumerable and developed rapidly, more than tripling the total liver volume from complete absence over the course of 24 months. The hepatic lesions continued to grow despite an otherwise moderate tumor response. Prior to patient death, the patient remained relatively asymptomatic from the cyst burden and was without signs of grossly metastatic disease. This rapid development of polycystic liver disease most likely represents a previously unseen medication side-effect of cabozantinib or pazopanib. It is important to identify adverse effects of novel antineoplastic agents in this time of oncological medical discovery.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cysts; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Diseases; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Renal cell carcinoma bone metastases (RCCBM) are typically osteolytic. We previously showed that BIGH3 (beta Ig-h3/TGFBI), secreted by 786-O renal cell carcinoma, plays a role in osteolytic bone lesion in RCCBM through inhibition of osteoblast (OSB) differentiation. To study this interaction, we employed three-dimensional (3D) hydrogels to coculture bone-derived 786-O (Bo-786) renal cell carcinoma cells with MC3T3-E1 pre-OSBs. Culturing pre-OSBs in the 3D hydrogels preserved their ability to differentiate into mature OSB; however, this process was decreased when pre-OSBs were cocultured with Bo-786 cells. Knockdown of BIGH3 in Bo-786 cells recovered OSB differentiation. Furthermore, treatment with bone morphogenetic protein 4, which stimulates OSB differentiation, or cabozantinib (CBZ), which inhibits VEGFR1 and MET tyrosine kinase activities, also increased OSB differentiation in the coculture. CBZ also inhibited pre-osteoclast RAW264.7 cell differentiation. Using RCCBM mouse models, we showed that CBZ inhibited Bo-786 tumor growth in bone. CBZ treatment also increased bone volume and OSB number, and decreased osteoclast number and blood vessel density. When tested in SN12PM6 renal cell carcinoma cells that have been transduced to overexpress BIGH3, CBZ also inhibited SN12PM6 tumor growth in bone. These observations suggest that enhancing OSB differentiation could be one of the therapeutic strategies for treating RCCBM that exhibit OSB inhibition characteristics, and that this 3D coculture system is an effective tool for screening osteoanabolic agents for further

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Apoptosis; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Coculture Techniques; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, SCID; Osteoblasts; Osteolysis; Pyridines; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Cabozantinib is approved for the first and subsequent line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on trials in which most patients were immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) naive. With an expanding role of ICB in earlier lines of therapy, we assessed activity of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic ccRCC after progressing on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based ICBs.. We retrospectively analysed the clinical outcomes of 86 patients from 2 academic centres who received cabozantinib after progression on ICB alone, ICB in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) or ICB in combination with other therapies. Overall response rate (ORR, investigator assessed), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS) and toxicities leading to dose reductions or cessation were evaluated.. Eighty-six patients were included in the analysis; the median age was 63 years (range 33-84) and the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-10). The type of prior ICB therapy was ICBs alone (64%), an ICB in combination with a VEGFi (29%) or ICBs in combination with other therapies (7%). At the time of cabozantinib treatment, 71% of patients were in the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium good- or intermediate-risk groups. Approximately half of patients (52%) were started on cabozantinib at the full 60 mg daily dose. The ORR was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 26-47%) with no complete response and 43% achieving stable disease; 21% had primary progressive disease. The median TTF was 6.5 months (95% CI = 5.3-8.5.). The median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI = 8.7-NR) with 55% (95% CI = 41-66%) OS rate at 12 months. Most common reasons for dose reductions were fatigue (27%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (16%) and diarrhoea (10%).. Cabozantinib is active in patients treated with prior ICB-based therapies, with no new safety signals. This study supports the use of cabozantinib after ICB-based therapies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boston; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Georgia; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Chromosomal rearrangements are common in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and their roles in mediating sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) remain elusive.. We developed an in silico strategy by screening copy number variance (CNV) that was potentially related to TKI or mTORi sensitivity in ccRCC by reproducing the TCGA and GDSC datasets. Candidate genes should be both significantly prognostic and related to drug sensitivity or resistance, and were then validated in vitro.. ADCYAP1 loss and GNAS gain were associated with sensitivity and resistance and to Cabozantinib, respectively. ACRBP gain and CTBP1 loss were associated with sensitivity and resistance and to Pazopanib, respectively. CDKN2A loss and SULT1A3 gain were associated with sensitivity and resistance and to Temsirolimus, respectively. CCNE1 gain was associated with resistance to Axitinib and LRP10 loss was associated with resistance to Sunitinib. Mutivariate analysis showed ADCYAP1, GNAS, and CCNE1 remained independently prognostic when adjusted for the rest.. Here we show CNVs of several genes that are associated with sensitivity and resistance to commonly used TKIs and mTORi in ccRCC. Further validation and functional analyses are therefore needed.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Arylsulfotransferase; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromogranins; Computer Simulation; Cyclin E; DNA Copy Number Variations; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Oncogene Proteins; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sirolimus; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Angiogenesis has been recognized as the most important factor for tumor invasion, proliferation, and progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, few clinical data are available regarding the efficacy of cabozantinib following immunotherapy.. To describe the outcome of cabozantinib in patients previously treated with immunotherapy.. Patients with mRCC who received cabozantinib immediately after nivolumab were included. The primary endpoint was to assess the outcome in terms of efficacy and activity.. Eighty-four mRCC patients met the criteria to be included in the final analysis. After a median follow-up of 9.4 months, median overall survival was 17.3 months. According to the IMDC criteria, the rates of patients alive at 12 months in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups were 100%, 74%, and 33%, respectively (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months (95% CI 8.3-14.7); no difference was found based on duration of previous first-line therapy or nivolumab PFS. The overall response rate was 52%, stable disease was found as the best response in 25.3% and progressive disease in 22.7% of patients. Among the 35 patients with progressive disease on nivolumab, 26 (74.3%) patients showed complete/partial response or stable disease with cabozantinib as best response after nivolumab. The major limitations of this study are the retrospective nature and the short follow-up.. Cabozantinib was shown to be effective and active in patients previously receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, cabozantinib can be considered a valid therapeutic option for previously treated mRCC patients, irrespective of the type and duration of prior therapies.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

First-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients with intermediate and poor-risk features consists of a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab + ipilimumab) or immunotherapy with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) drug (e.g., axitinib). The subsequent line of therapy should be determined on the basis of previous treatments and approved drugs available, based on the results of randomized clinical trials. Unfortunately, no phase 3 trial has compared the safety and efficacy of drugs after immunotherapy; thus, drug choice is more empirical than evidence-based. As the tumor may still be anti-VEGFR drug-naïve, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for first line treatment (e.g., sunitinib or pazopanib) may be beneficial. Because this is a second-line treatment, patients could also receive axitinib, cabozantinib, or a combination of lenvatinib and everolimus. The treating physician should choose an appropriate treatment according to the patient's age, comorbidities, and tolerability of previous checkpoint inhibitors, among other considerations. Cases of patients with renal cell carcinoma refractory to checkpoint inhibitor treatment are growing, warranting a review of the activity and safety of target therapies after immunotherapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Patient Selection; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

A 61-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on cabozantinib developed hand-foot skin reaction with predominantly dorsal involvement including painful violaceous plaques over the joints and keratotic yellow plaques on the palmar fingers. The medication was discontinued with resolution of the plaques and later reinitiated at a lower dose uneventfully.

Topics: Anilides; Biopsy; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Foot Dermatoses; Hand Dermatoses; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Skin

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Fever, as an adverse event, is well documented in a wide array of drugs including multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors however, it is not a previously well described consequence of the novel multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, cabozantinib.. In this paper we document the first detailed review of high-grade fevers in a 54 year old male (Caucasian) with a background of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma recently commenced on cabozantinib. After detailed investigation, we exclude infection and other common causes of fever as the causative agent and further, definitively resolve the recurrent fever by ceasing cabozantinib and starting a short course of oral corticosteroids.. We have demonstrated that cabozantinib should always be considered in the aetiology of high-grade fever in relevant patients. Further, we demonstrate that temporary cessation of cabozantinib and a course of short-term steroids can induce resolution of fever and allow for recommencement of cabozantinib safely thereafter.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Fever; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

The transcription factor SOX18, which was initially discovered as an activator of genetic transcription during embryogenesis, is now implicated in many diseases, including cancer, and is associated with the malignant tumor phenotype, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis. However, the role of SOX18 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not well understood. In the current study, SOX18 expression was evaluated in a 250 case-cohort of primary ccRCC tissues that included 103 cases of matched normal kidney tissues and 21 cases of metastatic tissues. Functional and mechanistic analyses were performed in cells that had SOX18 either overexpressed or silenced to evaluate the effects of SOX18 on cell function, the cellular response to cabozantinib, and SOX18-mediated molecular mechanisms. Our data revealed that upregulation and nuclear translocation of SOX18 promoted ccRCC carcinogenesis and metastasis. Elevated SOX18 expression was associated with advanced pathologic grades and TNM stages, as well as poor patient survival. SOX18 also regulated the cell cycle and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition to promote the malignant phenotype in ccRCC cells. The activation of EGF/EGFR and HGF/c-MET signaling

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Nude; Pyridines; SOXF Transcription Factors

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Approval; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Pyridines; Thyroid Neoplasms; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

To assess the pharmacologic costs of second-line treatments for metastatic renal-cell cancer (mRCC).. The present evaluation was restricted to pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled trials in second-line for mRCC. We calculated the pharmacologic costs necessary to get the benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) for each trial. The costs of drugs are at the pharmacy of our hospital and are expressed in euros.. Our analysis evaluated 5 phase 3 randomized controlled trials including 3112 patients. The lowest cost per month of progression-free survival and OS gained was associated with the use of cabozantinib (€2006 and €1473, respectively), while everolimus had the highest cost per month of OS gained (€28,590).. Combining pharmacologic costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by OS, cabozantinib is a cost-effective second-line treatments for patients with mRCC.

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Nivolumab-ipilimumab demonstrated a survival benefit over sunitinib in first-line setting for metastatic renal cell carcinomas (mRCCs) and is becoming a new standard of care for naïve patients with intermediate or poor risk prognosis (International mRCC Database Consortium). The efficacy of subsequent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after nivolumab-ipilimumab failure remains unclear.. Medical records of mRCC patients treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab, who received subsequent TKI, as part of Checkmate 214 study were reviewed in 13 institutions. Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS), response, overall survival (OS) and toxicities were retrospectively collected.. Overall 33 patients received subsequent TKI after nivolumab-ipilimumab failure. Median follow-up from start of subsequent TKI is 22 months (19-NR). Best response was assessed in 30 patients: 12 partial responses (36%), 13 stable diseases (39%) and five progressive diseases (15%). Median PFS from start of TKI was 8 months [5-13]. Median PFS with first-generation (sunitinib/pazopanib) and second-generation TKI (axitinib/cabozantinib) was 8 months [5-16] and 7 months (5-NA), respectively. PFS in second line was significantly longer in patients with a long first-line duration of response to the double immune checkpoint blockade (≥6 months) with 8 versus 5 months for short responder (<6 months) (p = 0.03). OS rate was 54% at 12 months. Toxicity was as expected: 42% developed at least one toxicity grade ≥3.. This is the first report of outcomes with TKI, after first-line nivolumab-ipilimumab failure. Median PFS suggests a sustained benefit of TKI and supports trials investigating the optimal sequence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Treatment Failure

Clinical practice shows significant differences in treatment outcomes across patients treated with cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). It is not known whether cabozantinib-induced adverse events are predictive factors of survival as in case of drugs such as sunitinib or axitinib. The study participants were 30 adult patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib as a second- or further line setting. All adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) values were calculated by taking the beginning of cabozantinib treatment as the start date and either disease progression or death as the end date. PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the log-rank test. We identified independent PFS predictors using multiple Cox proportional hazards models and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. The median observation time cabozantinib treatment was 7.5 months, with a range of 2-15 months. During that time, 11 (37%) of the patients had mRCC progression. Median PFS on cabozantinib was not reached, and lower quartile was 6 months. All patients developed at least one adverse event in the course of cabozantinib therapy. Hypertension, hypothyroidism and HFS were observed most frequently, in about two-thirds of the patients. The co-incidence of multiple adverse events was common. Hypertension, hypothyroidism, diarrhea and liver toxicity were significantly associated with longer PFS values. Patients with three or more side effects had significantly longer PFS than those with two or fewer. Even though this study was conducted in a small patient sample and the observation time was relatively short our results confirm the predictive value of the incidence of adverse events during cabozantinib treatment in mRCC patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this kind conducted in this group of patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pneumothorax; Pyridines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Data regarding the cardiac toxicity of cabozantinib lacks. The aim of our study was to assess the risk of cabozantinib-related cardiotoxicity in mRCC patients.. We performed a multicentre prospective study on mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib between October 2016 and November 2017. Transthoracic echocardiogram and plasma biomarkers assay were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months after cabozantinib initiation.. The study population included 22 mRCC patients. At baseline, 9.1% had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but none had a left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients with baseline reduced LVEF did not show further significant LVEF modification after 3 months. After 6 months, only 1 had an LVEF decline >10% compared to baseline, resulting in LV systolic dysfunction. At baseline, 64.7% and 27.3% of patients had elevated precursor brain natriuretic peptide (proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), respectively. Among patients with basal normal proBNP and hsTnI, none had elevated values at 3 and 6 months. No correlation was found between basal elevated proBNP and basal reduced LVEF (P = .29), and between elevated proBNP and reduced LVEF after 6 months (P = .37). Similarly, we found no correlations between elevated hsTnI and reduced LVEF or elevated proBNP at baseline (P = .47; P = .38), at 3 (P = .059; P = .45) and after 6 months (P = .72; P = 1.0).. This prospective study revealed a modest risk of developing left ventricular systolic dysfunction related to cabozantinib. A lack of correlation between elevated cardiac biomarkers and reduced LVEF at different time-points was detected. Assessments of the cardiac function should be reserved at the occurrence of clinical symptoms.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiotoxicity; Female; Humans; Incidence; Italy; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Time Factors; Troponin I; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cohort Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies

Cabozantinib is approved for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on the basis of studies done in clear-cell histology. The activity of cabozantinib in patients with non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma is poorly characterised. We sought to analyse the antitumour activity and toxicity of cabozantinib in advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.. We did a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with oral cabozantinib during any treatment line at 22 centres: 21 in the USA and one in Belgium. Eligibility required patients with histologically confirmed non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who received cabozantinib for metastatic disease during any treatment line roughly between 2015 and 2018. Mixed tumours with a clear-cell histology component were excluded. No other restrictive inclusion criteria were applied. Data were obtained from retrospective chart review by investigators at each institution. Demographic, surgical, pathological, and systemic therapy data were captured with uniform database templates to ensure consistent data collection. The main objectives were to estimate the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival after treatment.. Of 112 identified patients with non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated at the participating centres, 66 (59%) had papillary histology, 17 (15%) had Xp11.2 translocation histology, 15 (13%) had unclassified histology, ten (9%) had chromophobe histology, and four (4%) had collecting duct histology. The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response across all histologies was 30 (27%, 95% CI 19-36) of 112 patients. At a median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 6-18), median time to treatment failure was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·5-8·6), median progression-free survival was 7·0 months (5·7-9·0), and median overall survival was 12·0 months (9·2-17·0). The most common adverse events of any grade were fatigue (58 [52%]), and diarrhoea (38 [34%]). The most common grade 3 events were skin toxicity (rash and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia; five [4%]) and hypertension (four [4%]). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Across 54 patients with available next-generation sequencing data, the most frequently altered somatic genes were CDKN2A (12 [22%]) and MET (11 [20%]) with responses seen irrespective of mutational status.. While we await results from prospective studies, this real-world study provides evidence supporting the antitumour activity and safety of cabozantinib across non-clear-cell renal cell carcinomas. Continued support of international collaborations and prospective ongoing studies targeting non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes and specific molecular alterations are warranted to improve outcomes across these rare diseases with few evidence-based treatment options.. None.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Retrospective Studies

Cabozantinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, as well as MET, RET, and AXL. It is currently approved for treating advanced thyroid and kidney cancers, and is being investigated in other cancers. We present a case of reversible heart failure due to cabozantinib use in a 70-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This is, to our knowledge, one of the first reported cases of cardiomyopathy associated with cabozantinib use.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Heart Failure; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Cabozantinib is an approved treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This report presents an analysis of the safety profile and efficacy of cabozantinib in an unselected population from Poland.. Patients with mRCC, who had been treated with at least 1 previous agent targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, were eligible to receive cabozantinib at a once-daily dose of 60 mg orally, according to the Managed Access Program (MAP). Data were collected in 4 Polish centers. Patients who had received ≥ 1 dose of cabozantinib were monitored for adverse events (AEs) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0.. A total of 115 patients were enrolled between October 2016 and March 2018, including 50% with bone metastases, 10% with brain metastases and 4.3% with non-clear-cell RCC; 76% had received ≥ 2 lines of therapy. The median time of follow-up was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-14.1 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 AEs were fatigue (23%), hand-foot syndrome (12%), and diarrhea (10%). Only 4% of patients discontinued treatment owing to AEs, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Partial response was observed in 19% of patients, whereas 56% had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-14.2 months), with a 12-month overall survival rate of 70.4% (95% CI, 60.2%-78.5%).. Cabozantinib demonstrated acceptable tolerability and activity in a large unselected population of patients with mRCC under clinical conditions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Poland; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

In the present study, we explored the real-world efficacy of the immuno-oncology checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in the second-line setting.. Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (imdc) dataset, a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc) treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in the second line after prior therapy targeted to the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (vegfr) was performed. Baseline characteristics and imdc risk factors were collected. Overall survival (os) and time to treatment failure (ttf) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Overall response rates (orrs) were determined for each therapy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine survival differences between cabozantinib and nivolumab treatment.. The analysis included 225 patients treated with nivolumab and 53 treated with cabozantinib. No significant difference in median os was observed: 22.10 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 17.18 months to not reached] with nivolumab and 23.70 months (95% ci: 15.52 months to not reached) with cabozantinib (. Real-world imdc data indicate comparable os and ttf for nivolumab and cabozantinib. Both agents are reasonable therapeutic options for patients progressing after initial first-line vegfr-targeted therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Asymptomatic Diseases; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroimaging; Pyridines; Stroke

Cabozantinib showed efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study we aimed to describe the safety and to collect evidence on the potential efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients with brain metastases (BM) in a real-world experience.. We retrospectively collected data of patients treated with cabozantinib within the Italian Managed Access Program. Patients were selected for the presence of BM before the start of treatment and for at least 1 previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment regimen for metastatic disease. Safety data were reported, and overall response rate (ORR), brain-specific response, progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed.. Overall, 12 patients treated with cabozantinib were evaluated. Any grade adverse events (AEs) accounted for 92%, Grade 3/4 AEs rated at 36% with no major neurological side effects. The most common AEs included hypertension (33%), fatigue (24%), aminotransferase elevation (25%), hypothyroidism (16%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (16%). The ORR was 50% with a disease control rate of 75%. All 5 patients treated with a combined systemic and brain-directed approach obtained intracranial disease control, without increased toxicity. Median PFS and median OS were 5.8 and 8.8 months, respectively. Comparable safety and tolerability results for other TKI regimens were reported from the literature.. Cabozantinib showed safety, acceptable tolerability, and promising antitumor activity in a population of mRCC patients with BM from a real-world experience. A combined modality approach for renal cell carcinoma with BM, whenever feasible, could be recommended to improve oncological outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anilides; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status by IHC is prognostic in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and its role as a potential predictive biomarker is under investigation. Using tumor tissue from the METEOR (NCT01865747) and CABOSUN (NCT01835158) clinical trials, we explored whether PD-L1 expression and the extent of the immune cell infiltrate can serve as prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers for cabozantinib and other targeted agents.. IHC double staining for PD-L1 and CD45/CD163 (immune cell markers) was performed on tumor tissue from METEOR (. Tumor cell (TC) PD-L1 expression (≥1% cutoff) was detected in 29% and 23% of tumors from patients in the METEOR and CABOSUN trials, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with PD-L1-positive TC had poorer PFS and OS than patients with PD-L1-negative TC on both trials, independent of therapy. On multivariable analysis and when combining the two trials, the association between TC PD-L1 expression and OS was statistically significant for all patients (. Higher PD-L1 expression results in worse clinical outcomes in mRCC treated with targeted therapy. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression is not predictive of response to cabozantinib therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anilides; B7-H1 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nephrectomy; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sunitinib

To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT).. We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or without prior CN. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between groups, we used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We conducted OS analyses, including IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression models, interaction term, and landmark and sensitivity analyses.. Of the 261 patients, 97 (37.2%) received CN and 164 (62.8%) did not. IPTW-adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant OS benefit for patients treated with CN (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.83, P = 0.0015). While there was no statistically significant difference in OS at 3 months (P = 0.97), 6 months (P = 0.67), and 12 months (P = 0.11) from diagnosis, a benefit for the CN group was noted at 18 months (P = 0.005) and 24 months (P = 0.004). On interaction term analyses, the beneficial effect of CN increased with better performance status (P = 0.06), in women (P = 0.03), and in patients with thrombocytosis (P = 0.01).. IPTW-adjusted analysis of our patient cohort suggests that CN improves OS of patients with synchronous mRCC treated with TT. On the whole, the survival difference appears after 12 months. Specific subgroups may particularly benefit from CN, and these subgroups warrant further investigation in prospective trials.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nephrectomy; Nivolumab; Probability; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Survival Rate; Thrombocytosis

Purpose Cabozantinib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and AXL, increased progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in the phase III METEOR trial. Because bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity in patients with RCC, bone-related outcomes were analyzed in METEOR. Patients and Methods Six hundred fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 60 mg cabozantinib or 10 mg everolimus. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS, OS, and ORR were conducted in patients grouped by baseline bone metastases status per independent radiology committee (IRC). Additional end points included bone scan response per IRC, skeletal-related events, and changes in bone biomarkers. Results For patients with bone metastases at baseline (cabozantinib [n = 77]; everolimus [n = 65]), median PFS was 7.4 months for cabozantinib versus 2.7 months for everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.51]). Median OS was also longer with cabozantinib (20.1 months v 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.84]), and ORR per IRC was higher (17% v 0%). The rate of skeletal-related events was 23% with cabozantinib and 29% with everolimus, and bone scan response per IRC was 20% versus 10%, respectively. PFS, OS, and ORR were also improved with cabozantinib in patients without bone metastases. Changes in bone biomarkers were greater with cabozantinib than with everolimus. The overall safety profiles of cabozantinib and everolimus in patients with bone metastases were consistent with those observed in patients without bone metastases. Conclusion Cabozantinib treatment was associated with improved PFS, OS, and ORR when compared with everolimus treatment in patients with advanced RCC and bone metastases and represents a good treatment option for these patients.

Topics: Anilides; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Standard of Care; Survival Analysis

When considering optimal second-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), clinicians and payers seek to understand the relative clinical benefits and costs of treatment.. To use an economic model to compare the additional cost per month of overall survival (OS) and of progression-free survival (PFS) for cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib with everolimus for the second-line treatment of mRCC from a third-party U.S. payer perspective.. The model evaluated mean OS and PFS and costs associated with drug acquisition/administration; adverse event (AE) treatment; monitoring; and postprogression (third-line treatment, monitoring, and end-of-life costs) over 1- and 2-year horizons. Efficacy, safety, and treatment duration inputs were estimated from regimens' pivotal clinical trials; for everolimus, results were weighted across trials. Mean 1- and 2-year OS and mean 1-year PFS were estimated using regimens' reported OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Dosing and administration inputs were consistent with approved prescribing information and the clinical trials used to estimate efficacy and safety inputs. Cost inputs came from published literature and public data. Additional cost per additional month of OS or PFS was calculated using the ratio of the cost difference per treated patient and the corresponding difference in mean OS or PFS between everolimus and each comparator. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying efficacy and cost inputs.. Compared with everolimus, cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib were associated with 1.6, 0.3, and 0.5 additional months of PFS, respectively, over 1 year. Cabozantinib and nivolumab were associated with additional months of OS compared with everolimus (1 year: 0.7 and 0.8 months; 2 years: 1.6 and 2.3 months; respectively); axitinib was associated with fewer months (1 year: -0.2 months; 2 years: -0.7 months). The additional costs of treatment with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus over 1 year were $34,141, $19,371, and $17,506 higher, respectively. Everolimus had similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib. The additional cost per month of OS was $48,773 for cabozantinib and $24,214 for nivolumab versus everolimus. The additional treatment cost with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus for each additional month of PFS was estimated at $21,338, $64,570, and $35,012, respectively. Over 2 years, the additional costs per additional month of OS for nivolumab and axitinib versus everolimus were similar to the 1-year analysis; for cabozantinib, the cost was lower. Results were sensitive to changes in mean OS, mean PFS, therapy duration, and drug costs estimates.. Everolimus for second-line mRCC was associated with similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib over 1- and 2-year horizons. The additional cost per additional month of OS and PFS associated with cabozantinib or nivolumab versus everolimus creates a metric for evaluating the cost of second-line therapies in relation to their respective treatment effects.. Funding for this research was provided by Novartis, which was involved in all stages of study research and manuscript preparation. Ghate and Perez are employees of Novartis and own stock/stock options. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau are employees of Analysis Group, which has received consultancy fees from Novartis. Study concept and design were contributed by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez, along with McDonald and Duchesneau. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau collected the data, and all authors participated in data interpretation. The manuscript was written by Swallow, Messali, and Ghate, along with the other authors, and revised by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez. A synopsis of the current research was presented in poster format at the 15th International Kidney Cancer Symposium on November 4-5, 2016, in Miami, Florida.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Costs; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Axitinib; Biomarkers, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Approval; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

The randomized phase 3 METEOR study confirmed a survival benefit of cabozantinib over everolimus in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) with disease that progressed after treatment with at least one previous antiangiogenic inhibitor. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and activity of cabozantinib in an unselected population.. Data were collected across 24 Italian centers. Cabozantinib therapy was initiated at physician request between September and December 2016. Patients with mRCC with disease that progressed after one or more prior systemic treatment were evaluated. Cabozantinib 60 mg was administered orally once daily. Doses were reduced to 40 mg or 20 mg in patients experiencing grade 3 or intolerable grade 2 adverse events (AEs).. Data from 96 patients were evaluated. Cabozantinib was administered as second-line therapy in 28 patients (29%) and as third-line therapy in 18 patients (19%), while the remaining 50 patients (52%) received cabozantinib in further treatment lines. Sixty-six patients began therapy with the full dose of 60 mg. Because of poor performance status, 29 patients began therapy with a reduced dose of 40 mg and 1 patient with 20 mg. At the time of our analysis, grade 3/4 AEs were observed in 35 patients (36%). Only 5 patients discontinued treatment as a result of AEs. Partial response was observed in 35 patients (36%), whereas 33 (34%) had stable disease and 28 (30%) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months.. Cabozantinib showed acceptable tolerability and activity in a large unselected population treated according to everyday clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Italy; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Patient Selection; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Cabozantinib prolongs overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that progressed on first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI). The role of cabozantinib has not been established in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC).. This is a retrospective study of 30 patients with nccRCC who received cabozantinib from January 2013 to January 2017. Information collected included baseline characteristics, toxicity, dose reductions, PFS and OS. A fellowship trained abdominal radiologist, blinded to patient history and clinical data, assessed radiographic response using RECIST, v1.1.. With a median follow-up of 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4-28.8), median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.1-14.7), and median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI: 15.5-35.4). Of the 28 patients with measurable disease, 4 had partial responses (2 papillary, 1 chromophobe and 1 unclassified RCC), 18 had stable disease (64.2%) and 6 had progressive disease (21.4%), resulting in a 14.3% objective response rate and a 78.6% disease control rate. Two patients with papillary RCC who had experienced disease progression on savolitinib achieved durable partial response and stable disease, respectively, following treatment with cabozantinib. Of the 21 patients who started cabozantinib at 60 mg/d, 12 (57.1%) required dose reduction due to toxicity.. In this retrospective study, cabozantinib produced a clinically meaningful benefit in patients with metastatic nccRCC, the majority of whom had disease progression on prior VEGFR-TKIs. Prospective trials of cabozantinib in nccRCC are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diarrhea; Fatigue; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Proteins; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy

Renal cell carcinoma represents 3-5% of adult malignant tumors. Metastases are found in 30-40% of patients and brain metastases occurred in more than 10% of them. Despite significant progress in medical treatment, patients with brain metastases still have a limited survival. Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, was recently registered for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Almost no data are, however, available on patients with brain metastases.. Case 1 is a 51-year-old man of North African origin; Case 2 is a 55-year-old European man. Case 1 and Case 2 had metastases of renal carcinoma at initial diagnosis and were treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptors tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Case 1 had clear cell renal carcinoma and underwent nephrectomy; he then received several lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitor directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and the mTor complex. During the second treatment a brain metastasis was diagnosed and treated with radiosurgery with rapid efficacy. Two years later he received nivolumab, an antibody directed against the programmed death-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 complex, but disease progression was observed with the reappearance of the brain metastasis together with neurologic symptoms. Cabozantinib was administered and induced a rapid clinical improvement as well as tumor regression in all sites including his brain. Sequencing of his tumor evidenced a mutation of the MET gene. Case 2 had a papillary renal carcinoma with brain metastases at time of diagnosis. After radiation of the brain tumors, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor was administered for 3 years. The disease was under control in all sites except in his brain; several new brain metastases requiring new radiation treatments developed. The disease finally progressed at all metastatic sites including his brain and he had several neurological symptoms. Cabozantinib was administered and rapidly induced a clinical improvement; a further computed tomography scan and brain magnetic resonance imaging showed significant tumor regressions. No MET gene mutation or amplification was observed in the tumor analysis.. These case reports indicate that cabozantinib was able, first, to reach brain tumors and second, to induce significant regressions in renal carcinoma brain metastases that were resistant to radiation as well as to previous systemic vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Treatment Outcome

Advanced-stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carries a dismal prognosis for pediatric patients with few studied therapeutic options. Cabozantinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor against the oncoprotein MET. It is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug administration for second-line treatment of RCC in adults. There is no published data on its use in children with RCC. We report here two pediatric patients with recurrent metastatic RCC whose tumors expressed MET and were treated with cabozantinib. Both patients had significant disease regression and symptomatic improvement for over 15 months with tolerable adverse effects. Cabozantinib can maintain prolonged disease control in pediatric RCC and warrants further study.

Topics: Adolescent; Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Child; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Cabozantinib is an oral multiple tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor (ITK): VEGFR2, c-MET and RET. Inhibition of VEGFR and c-MET decrease resistance of VEGFR inhibitor via c-MET axis. Cabozantinib improve progression-free survival (PFS) in progressive metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC): 4 months in the placebo group and 11.2 months in the cabozantinib group (P<0.001) in all patient subgroups including those with or without prior ITK and RET mutation status. Cabozantinib increased overall survival (OS) compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed after previous VEGFR ITK treatment: 21.4 months in cabozantinib group and 16.5 months in everolimus group (P<0.0003). Cabozantinib obtained the AMM for the treatment of progressive metastatic MTC and advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib is a new option in the treatment of MTC by inclusion in therapeutic trials (no payment in this indication) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (hospital delivery). Its tolerance is similar to anti-angiogenic therapies and justifies an optimal management of the secondary effect.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Thyroid Neoplasms; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Sunitinib

Previous research has identified disparities between urban and rural cancer care, including clinical trial access. Therefore, we addressed three different questions in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer managed according to national guidelines in a rural Norwegian standard practice setting. (1) How many patients would have been eligible for three recent landmark randomized clinical trials? (2) Is survival different between eligible and non-eligible patients receiving first-line systemic therapy? (3) Is survival different between eligible patients and published trial results? We performed a retrospective analysis of 101 consecutive patients (2006-2016). Only 52% of the patients were eligible for the first-line study of pazopanib versus sunitinib. The main reasons for violating inclusion or exclusion criteria were presence of brain metastases, absence of clear cell histology, and poor performance status. Even fewer patients were eligible for trials of nivolumab and cabozantinib in pre-treated patients. Eligible patients had significantly better survival than non-eligible patients, median 29.2 versus 8.5 months (p = 0.0001). These results confirm that many patients from rural practices do not fulfill all mandatory trial eligibility criteria. However, eligible patients managed according to national guidelines had survival outcomes in line with published first-line trial results.

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Rural Population; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Costs; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; State Medicine; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

The chimeric antigen receptor-modified immune effector cell (CAR-T and CAR-NK) therapies are newly developed adoptive treatments of cancers. However, their therapeutic efficacy against solid tumors is limited. Combining CAR-T or CAR-NK cells with chemotherapeutic drugs to treat solid tumor may be a promising strategy. We developed an epidermal growth factor- (EGFR-) specific third-generation CAR. NK-92 cells were modified with the CAR by lentivirus infection. The specific killing ability of the CAR-modified NK-92 cells (CAR-NK-92) against renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines was confirmed

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cell Line; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Kidney Neoplasms; Killer Cells, Natural; Mice; Mice, SCID; Pyridines; Receptors, Antigen; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Second-line systemic treatment options for metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer (mccRCC) are diverse and treatment strategies are variable among experts. Our aim was to investigate the approach for the second-line treatment after first-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Recently two phase III trials have demonstrated a potential role for nivolumab (NIV) and cabozantinib (CAB) in this setting. We aimed to estimate the impact of these trials on clinical decision making.. Eleven international experts were asked to provide their treatment strategies for second-line systemic therapy for mccRCC in the current setting and once NIV and CAB will be approved and available. The treatment strategies were analyzed with the objective consensus approach.. The analysis of the decision trees revealed everolimus (EVE), axitinib (AXI), NIV and TKI switch (sTKI) as therapeutic options after first-line TKI therapy in the current situation and mostly NIV and CAB in the future setting. The most commonly used criteria for treatment decisions were duration of response, TKI tolerance and zugzwang a composite of several related criteria.. In contrast to the first-line setting, recommendations for second-line systemic treatment of mccRCC among experts were not as heterogeneous. The agents mostly used after disease progression on a first-line TKI included: EVE, AXI, NIV and sTKI. In the future setting of NIV and CAB availability, NIV was the most commonly chosen drug, whereas several experts identified situations where CAB would be preferred.

Topics: Algorithms; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Consensus; Decision Support Techniques; Decision Trees; Everolimus; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Failure

MET plays an important role in the development and progression of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). Evaluation of efficacy of MET inhibitors against pRCC has been hampered by limited preclinical models depicting MET abnormalities. We established a new patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of pRCC carrying an activating mutation of MET and tested the ability of cabozantinib, an inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases including MET, to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis. Precision-cut, thin tissue slices from a pRCC specimen obtained by nephrectomy were implanted under the renal capsule of RAG2

Topics: Anilides; Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Mice; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Development; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Sunitinib

The European Association of Urology renal cancer guidelines have been updated to recommend nivolumab and cabozantinib over the previous standard of care in patients who have failed one or more lines of VEGF targeted therapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Everolimus; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Retreatment; Treatment Failure; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Topics: Anilides; Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Incompatibility; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kidney Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

The FDA has approved cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior antiangiogenic therapy. In a randomized phase III trial, participants who received cabozantinib did better across three efficacy endpoints-progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate-than those given the mTOR inhibitor everolimus.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome

N/A (Letter to the Editor).

Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Cabozantinib/XL184 (Exelexis, Inc.) has demonstrated remarkable responses in kidney cancer. Preclinical results revealed VEGF, KIT and MET inhibition in a variety of solid tumors such as thyroid, ovarian, renal, lung, liver and prostate cancers. A phase II trial demonstrated efficacy in renal cancer with a 28 % objective response rate, stable disease rate of 62 % and median progression free survival of 14.7 months. Predominant toxicities of fatigue and diarrhea were noted. Dramatic responses in bone metastases (three of four patients) make the agent especially valuable for palliation in a disease, where presence of bone metastases is a predictor of worse survival. Cabozantinib is an emerging novel agent with promising activity in advanced kidney cancer. Randomized trials are planned in comparison with standard VEGF inhibitor therapy. Defining the role of MET overexpression would help patient selection and enrich and enhance the future evaluation of this targeted novel agent.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyridines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases