cabozantinib has been researched along with Hypertension* in 9 studies
3 review(s) available for cabozantinib and Hypertension
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cabozantinib, Vandetanib, Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib as Treatment for Progressed Medullary Thyroid Cancer with a Main Focus on Hypertension as Adverse Effect.
This manuscript investigates cabozantinib, vandetanib, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, four tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are used to treat advanced and/or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Data on efficacy and safety are presented with the main focus on treatment-related hypertension, a well-known adverse effect (AE) of these TKIs. Taken together, TKI-induced hypertension is rarely a dose-limiting side effect. However, with increasing survival times of patients under treatment, hypertension-associated complications can be expected to be on the rise without proper medication. Topics: Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Humans; Hypertension; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Thyroid Neoplasms | 2023 |
Pazopanib, Cabozantinib, and Vandetanib in the Treatment of Progressive Medullary Thyroid Cancer with a Special Focus on the Adverse Effects on Hypertension.
Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. First line therapy is surgery, which is the only curative method of the disease. However, in non-operable cases or with tumor progression and metastases, a systemic treatment is necessary. This form of cancer is often insensitive to conventional chemotherapy, but the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as pazopanib, cabozantinib, and vandetanib, has shown promising results with an increase in progression-free survival and prolonged lifetime. Therefore, we focused on the pharmacological characteristics of TKIs, their mechanism of action, their application as a secondary treatment option for MTC, their efficacy as a cancer drug treatment, and reviewed the ongoing clinical trials. TKIs also act systemically causing various adverse events (AEs). One common AE of this treatment is hypertension, known to be associated with cardiovascular disease and can therefore potentially worsen the well-being of the treated patients. The available treatment strategies of drug-induced hypertension were discussed. The mechanism behind the development of hypertension is still unclear. Therefore, the treatment of this AE remains symptomatic. Thus, future studies are necessary to investigate the link between tumor growth inhibition and hypertension. In addition, optimized, individual treatment strategies should be implemented. Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Cardiotoxicity; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Sulfonamides; Thyroid Neoplasms | 2018 |
Incidence and risk of hypertension associated with cabozantinib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cabozantinib (XL184) is an oral inhibitor of multiplereceptor tyrosine kinases including mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). Hypertension is one of its major side effects, but the incidence rate and overall risk has not been systematically studied. We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing hypertension in cancer patients treated with cabozantinib.. Pubmed, Embase and oncology conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of cabozantinib in cancer patients with data on hypertension available. A total of 1,514 patients (cabozantinib, 1083; control, 431) with a variety of solid tumors from 8 prospective clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. The use of cabozantinib was associated with significantly increased risk of developing all grade (RR 5.48; 95%CI, 3.76-7.99; p < 0.001) and high grade (5.09; 95% CI: 2.71-9.54, p < 0.001) hypertension in comparison with controls. Additionally, the risk of high grade hypertension with cabozantinib was substantially higher than other four approved VEGFR-TKIs (sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib and pazopanib). Expert commentary: Cancer patients receiving cabozantinib have an increased risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and management of hypertension are recommended. Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Risk | 2016 |
4 trial(s) available for cabozantinib and Hypertension
Article | Year |
---|---|
Outcomes based on age in the phase III METEOR trial of cabozantinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Cabozantinib improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after prior antiangiogenic therapy in the phase III METEOR trial (NCT01865747). Limited data are available on the use of targeted therapies in older patients with advanced RCC.. Efficacy and safety in METEOR were retrospectively analysed for three age subgroups: <65 (n = 394), 65-74 (n = 201) and ≥75 years (n = 63).. PFS, OS and ORR were improved with cabozantinib compared with everolimus in all age subgroups. The PFS hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.68), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.77) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.79) for <65, 65-74 and ≥75 years, respectively, and the OS HRs were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.95), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.28-1.14). The ORR for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 15% vs 5%, 21% vs 2% and 19% vs 0%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in PFS or OS with age as a categorical or continuous variable. Grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were generally consistent across subgroups, although fatigue, hypertension and hyponatraemia occurred more frequently in older patients treated with cabozantinib. Dose reductions to manage AEs were more frequent in patients receiving cabozantinib than in those receiving everolimus. Dose reductions and treatment discontinuation due to AEs were more frequent in older patients in both treatment groups.. Cabozantinib improved PFS, OS and ORR compared with everolimus in previously treated patients with advanced RCC, irrespective of age group, supporting use in all age categories. Proactive dose modification and supportive care may help to mitigate AEs in older patients while maintaining efficacy. Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Diarrhea; Everolimus; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies | 2020 |
Phase I Study of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab Alone or With Ipilimumab for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and Other Genitourinary Tumors.
We assessed the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) and CaboNivo plus ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) malignances.. Patients received escalating doses of CaboNivo or CaboNivoIpi. The primary objective was to establish a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (OS).. Fifty-four patients were enrolled at eight dose levels with a median follow-up time of 44.6 months; data cutoff was January 20, 2020. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75% and 87% of patients treated with CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi, respectively, and included fatigue (17% and 10%, respectively), diarrhea (4% and 7%, respectively), and hypertension (21% and 10%, respectively); grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs included hepatitis (0% and 13%, respectively) and colitis (0% and 7%, respectively). The RP2D was cabozantinib 40 mg/d plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg for CaboNivo and cabozantinib 40 mg/d, nivolumab 3 mg/kg, and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg for CaboNivoIpi. ORR was 30.6% (95% CI, 20.0% to 47.5%) for all patients and 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9% to 68.4%) for patients with mUC. Median DoR was 21.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 24.1 months) for all patients and not reached for patients with mUC. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.9 months) for all patients and 12.8 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 24.1 months) for patients with mUC. Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 18.8 months) for all patients and 25.4 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 41.6 months) for patients with mUC.. CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated manageable toxicities with durable responses and encouraging survival in patients with mUC and other GU tumors. Multiple phase II and III trials are ongoing for these combinations. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Colitis; Diarrhea; Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule; Fatigue; Female; Hepatitis; Humans; Hypertension; Ipilimumab; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating; Nivolumab; Progression-Free Survival; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyridines; Receptors, CXCR4; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Survival Rate; Urogenital Neoplasms; Young Adult | 2020 |
A phase 2 and biomarker study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma.
Advanced cholangiocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis, and no standard treatment exists beyond first-line gemcitabine/platinum-based chemotherapy. A single-arm, phase 2 and biomarker study of cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and MET, was performed for patients with advanced refractory cholangiocarcinoma.. Previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma received cabozantinib (60 mg orally and daily on a continuous schedule). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor MET expression and plasma biomarkers were evaluated.. The study enrolled 19 patients with cholangiocarcinoma (female, 68%; median age, 67 years; intrahepatic vs extrahepatic, 84% vs 16%). The median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.6-5.4 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.7-10.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 89% of the patients and included neutropenia (5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), epistaxis (5%), bowel perforation (5%), enterocutaneous fistulas (5%), and hypertension (11%). One patient with 3 + MET expression in the tumor stayed on treatment for 278 days, but the MET expression did not correlate with the outcomes in the overall study population. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, and stromal cell-derived factor 1α increased and soluble VEGFR2 and angiopoietin 2 decreased after treatment (all P values < .01). Plasma tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 was inversely correlated with PFS, and soluble MET (sMET) and interleukin 6 were inversely correlated with OS.. In unselected patients with cholangiocarcinoma, cabozantinib demonstrated limited activity and significant toxicity. In the first clinical trial to assess the role of MET inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma, 1 patient with a MET-high tumor had a prolonged benefit from treatment. Baseline plasma soluble MET was associated with OS. Any further development of this drug in cholangiocarcinoma should include a dose reduction and a biomarker-driven approach. Cancer 2017;123:1979-1988. © 2017 American Cancer Society. Topics: Aged; Angiopoietin-2; Anilides; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Chemokine CXCL12; Cholangiocarcinoma; Disease-Free Survival; Epistaxis; Female; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Hypertension; Interleukin-6; Intestinal Fistula; Intestinal Perforation; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 1; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Placenta Growth Factor; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Pyridines; Survival Rate; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 | 2017 |
Phase 1 dose escalation trial of the safety and pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib concurrent with temozolomide and radiotherapy or temozolomide after radiotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with high-grade gliomas.
Cabozantinib inhibits mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and has demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, warranting evaluation of the addition of cabozantinib to radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.. Cabozantinib doses of 40 mg and 60 mg were explored. Patients on the concurrent treatment arm received cabozantinib daily with standard TMZ and after RT continued cabozantinib daily with adjuvant TMZ. In the maintenance arm, patients who completed RT and ≥1 adjuvant cycle of TMZ continued adjuvant TMZ with added cabozantinib (3 schedules: days 1-28, days 1-14, or days 8-21).. A total of 26 patients (25 with recurrent glioblastoma and 1 patient with anaplastic astrocytoma) aged 30 to 72 years were enrolled (10 to the concurrent arm and 16 to the maintenance arm). The median number of post-RT TMZ cycles was 4.5 (range, 0-14 cycles) in the concurrent arm and 5.5 (range, 1-12 cycles) in the maintenance arm. Cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily was the maximum administered dose and a dose of 40 mg daily was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose for both treatment arms (schedule of days 1-28). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31% of patients), leukopenia (27% of patients, including 5 patients with neutropenia), and deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (23% of patients) (adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]).. Cabozantinib at a dose of 40 mg daily with RT plus TMZ and post-RT TMZ for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma was generally well tolerated, and demonstrated no pharmacokinetic interactions with concurrent TMZ. Given the strong theoretical rationale for combining anti-VEGF and anti-MET activity with standard therapy, cabozantinib at a dose of 40 mg daily warrants evaluation in combination with standard therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Astrocytoma; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Constipation; Dacarbazine; Diarrhea; Fatigue; Female; Glioblastoma; Humans; Hypertension; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Leukopenia; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Grading; Neurosurgical Procedures; Neutropenia; Pyridines; Temozolomide; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome | 2016 |
2 other study(ies) available for cabozantinib and Hypertension
Article | Year |
---|---|
Analysis of Toxicity and Clinical Outcomes in Full Versus Reduced Starting Dose Cabozantinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.
Full dose cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 60 mg, but adverse events (AEs) may require dose reductions. Limited data exist comparing efficacy among cabozantinib doses. We compared AEs and clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with full vs. reduced starting cabozantinib dose.. We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib at Winship Cancer Institute from 2016 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response (OR) rate measured clinical outcomes. AEs were collected from clinic notes and the most common were hypertension, mucositis/hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), or gastrointestinal toxicity. Univariate analysis (UVA) between starting doses and AEs with clinical outcomes was performed using logistic regression model. Multivariable analysis was also performed using Cox proportional hazard model.. Most patients were men (71%) with clear-cell RCC (72%). The majority were IMDC intermediate (58%) or poor (35%) risk. One third received first-line cabozantinib and 64% had ≥3 baseline metastatic sites. Most patients (68%) required dose reduction from 60 mg or started at reduced dose without escalation. Reduced dose patients were more likely to have ≥3 distant metastatic sites (70% vs. 58%) and ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy (50% vs. 40%) compared to full dose patients. UVA revealed a trend towards shorter OS (HR: 1.78, P = .095), PFS (HR: 1.50, P = .107), and lower chance of OR (HR:0.42, P = .149) among reduced dose patients. This trend did not hold in Multivariable analysis (OS HR: 1.20, P = .636; PFS HR: 1.23, P = .4662). Mucositis/HFSR and hypertension were significantly associated with improved outcomes in UVA.. Although we found a trend favoring full dose cabozantinib, this is likely due to worse baseline disease characteristics among patients starting on a reduced dose. Hypertension and mucositis/HFSR may be associated with improved outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings. Topics: Anilides; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Mucositis; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies | 2022 |
Cabozantinib-induced hand-foot skin reaction with subungual splinter hemorrhages and hypertension: a possible association with inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway.
Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Hand-Foot Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Nail Diseases; Pyridines | 2013 |