cabazitaxel and Drug-Related-Side-Effects-and-Adverse-Reactions

On March 17, 2011 the European Commission issued a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union for Jevtana® (Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen. The active substance of Jevtana® is cabazitaxel acetone solvate, an antineoplastic agent that acts by disrupting the microtubular network in cells. The recommended dose of cabazitaxel is 25 mg/m2 administered as a 1-hour i.v. infusion every 3 weeks in combination with oral prednisone or prednisolone, 10 mg, administered daily throughout treatment. In the main study submitted for this application, a 2.4-month longer median overall survival time and a 30% lower risk for death were observed for cabazitaxel, compared with mitoxantrone. The most common side effects with cabazitaxel were anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. This paper summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the European Union. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics, are available on the European Medicines Agency Web site (http://www.ema.europa.eu).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; European Union; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.. This prospective multicenter observational study registered all patients with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel following its launch in Japan in September 2014. Patient enrollment continued until at least 500 patients were enrolled. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated according to CTCAE ver. 4.0. Efficacy endpoints were assessed for up to 1 year, and included prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rates (defined as a decrease of ≥30% or ≥50% from baseline), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF).. A total of 660 mCRPC patients were enrolled across 316 centers by June 2016. Frequent ADRs (any grade) were neutropenia (49.1%), febrile neutropenia (18.0%) and anemia (15.0%). Most ADRs occurred in cycle 1. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were significantly less frequent in patients who received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The PSA response rates for decrease of ≥30% or ≥50% from baseline were 28.1% and 17.5%, respectively, in patients with baseline PSA of ≥5 ng/ml. Median OS and TTF were 319 days (95% confidence interval: 293.0-361.0) and 116 days (95% confidence interval: 108.0-135.0), respectively.. This study of cabazitaxel in 660 Japanese patients treated in real-world settings, the largest study of cabazitaxel to date, demonstrated a safety profile that was generally consistent with those of pivotal clinical studies. Cabazitaxel was also effective in terms of the PSA response, OS, and TTF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Docetaxel; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Kallikreins; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Safety; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

With the approval of several new treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), budgetary impact is a concern for health plan decision makers. Budget impact models (BIMs) are becoming a requirement in many countries as part of formulary approval or reimbursement decisions. Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane developed to overcome resistance to docetaxel and is approved for the treatment of patients with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.. To estimate a 1-year projected budget impact of varying utilization rates of cabazitaxel as a second-line treatment for mCRPC following docetaxel, using a hypothetical U.S. private managed care plan with 1 million members.. A BIM was developed to evaluate costs for currently available treatment options for patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel. Treatments included in the model were cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and radium-223, with utilization rates derived from market research data. Medication costs were calculated according to published pricing benchmarks factored by dosing and duration of therapy as stated in the prescribing information for each agent. Published rates and costs of grade 3-4 adverse events were also factored into the model. In addition, the model reports budget impact under 2 scenarios. In the first base-case scenario, patient out-of-pocket costs were subtracted from the total cost of treatment. In the second scenario, all treatment costs were assumed to be paid by the plan.. In a hypothetical 1 million-member health plan population, 100 patients were estimated to receive second-line treatment for mCRPC after treatment with docetaxel. Using current utilization rates for the 4 agents of interest, the base-case scenario estimated the cost of second-line treatment after docetaxel to be $6,331,704, or $0.528 per member per month (PMPM). In a scenario where cabazitaxel use increases from the base-rate case of 24% to a hypothetical rate of 33%, the PMPM cost would decrease to $0.524, reflecting a cost saving of $0.004 PMPM and equating to incremental savings of $49,546, or $497 per patient per year (PPPY). In the second scenario, when out-of-pocket costs were not considered, the cost of second-line treatment after docetaxel was estimated as $6,733,594, or $0.561 PMPM. With a hypothetical increase in cabazitaxel use (24%-33%), the PMPM cost would decrease to $0.554, reflecting savings of $0.007 PMPM and equating to incremental savings of $86,136, or $864 PPPY. The primary driver of cost savings with increased cabazitaxel use was lower acquisition cost. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the model results were robust over a wide range of input values (utilization, prevalence, and population parameters).. In the presented BIM, an increase in cabazitaxel use is expected to result in modest cost savings to the health plan. Patient coinsurance savings may also be realized based on applicable Medicare Part B and Part D calculations. This BIM presents an objective, comprehensive, robust, and user-adaptable tool that health plans and medical decision makers may use to evaluate potential economic impact of formulary and reimbursement decisions.. Research and analysis were funded by Sanofi US. The sponsor had the opportunity to review the final draft; however, the authors were responsible for all content and editorial decisions. Flannery, Drea, Hudspeth, and Miao are employees of Sanofi. Miao is an owner of stock in Sanofi. Corman, Gao, and Xue are employees of Pharmerit International and served as consultants to Sanofi during this study. All authors contributed to study design and data collection and analysis. The manuscript was written by Flannery, along with the other authors, and revised by all the authors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Budgets; Computer Simulation; Cost Savings; Docetaxel; Drug Costs; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Managed Care Programs; Models, Economic; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids

The therapeutic index for chemotherapeutic drugs is determined in part by systemic toxicity, so strategies for dose intensification to improve efficacy must also address tolerability. In addressing this issue, we have investigated a novel combinatorial strategy of reconstructing a drug molecule and using sequential drug-induced nanoassembly to fabricate supramolecular nanomedicines (SNM). Using cabazitaxel as a target agent, we established that individual synthetic prodrugs tethered with polyunsaturated fatty acids were capable of recapitulating self-assembly behavior independent of exogenous excipients. The resulting SNM could be further refined by PEGylation with amphiphilic copolymers suitable for preclinical studies. Among these cabazitaxel derivatives, docosahexaenoic acid-derived compound

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Materials Testing; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Nude; Nanomedicine; Neoplasms; Polymerization; Polymers; Prodrugs; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Taxoids; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

We hypothesized that the adverse event (AE) profile of cabazitaxel with regard to alopecia, nail changes, neuropathy, and dysgeusia differs from docetaxel.. Prospectively collected data on treatment-emergent AEs (frequency and grade [G]) from clinical trial databases of docetaxel every 3 weeks (q3w) (in TAX327 and VENICE) and cabazitaxel q3w (in TROPIC) were analyzed.. The frequency of new or worsening AEs (all G and G3-4) for 1301 patients was significantly less for alopecia, nail changes, neuropathy, and dysgeusia for cabazitaxel compared with docetaxel.. Treatment with cabazitaxel might cause less alopecia, nail changes, neuropathy, and dysgeusia compared with docetaxel.

Topics: Alopecia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Docetaxel; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Dysgeusia; Humans; Male; Nail Diseases; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Taxoids