c-peptide and Tremor

c-peptide has been researched along with Tremor* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for c-peptide and Tremor

ArticleYear
Comparing hormonal and symptomatic responses to experimental hypoglycaemia in insulin- and sulphonylurea-treated Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:7

    Patients with diabetes rely on symptoms to identify hypoglycaemia. Previous data suggest patients with Type 2 diabetes develop greater symptomatic and hormonal responses to hypoglycaemia at higher glucose concentrations than non-diabetic controls and these responses are lowered by insulin treatment. It is unclear if this is as a result of insulin therapy itself or improved glucose control. We compared physiological responses to hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes patients treated with sulphonylureas (SUs) or insulin (INS) with non-diabetic controls (CON).. Stepped hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemic clamps were performed on 20 subjects with Type 2 diabetes, 10 SU-treated and 10 treated with twice-daily premixed insulin, and 10 age- and weight-matched non-diabetic controls. Diabetic subjects were matched for diabetes duration, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and hypoglycaemia experience. We measured symptoms, counterregulatory hormones and cognitive function at glucose plateaux of 5, 4, 3.5, 3 and 2.5 mmol/l.. Symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia occurred at higher blood glucose concentrations in SU-treated than INS-treated patients [3.5 (0.4) vs. 2.6 (0.5) mmol/l SU vs. INS; P = 0.001] or controls [SU vs. CON 3.5 (0.4) vs. 3.0 (0.6) mmol/l; P = 0.05]. They also had a greater increase in symptom scores at hypoglycaemia [13.6 (11.3) vs. 3.6 (6.1) vs. 5.1 (4.3) SU vs. INS vs. CON; P = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in counterregulatory hormone responses or impairment of cognitive function among groups.. Sulphonylurea-treated subjects are more symptomatic of hypoglycaemia at a higher glucose level than insulin-treated subjects. This may protect them from severe hypoglycaemia but hinder attainment of glycaemic goals.

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Case-Control Studies; Cognition; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Epinephrine; Fasting; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Middle Aged; Norepinephrine; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Tremor

2009
Similar physiological and symptomatic responses to sulphonylurea and insulin induced hypoglycaemia in normal subjects.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 1996, Volume: 13, Issue:7

    There is little information concerning the physiological response to hypoglycaemia induced by sulphonylureas. We compared the physiological and symptomatic responses to insulin and tolbutamide induced hypoglycaemia in 8 normal subjects. While infusing either insulin or tolbutamide, we used a glucose clamp to maintain blood glucose at 4.5 mmol l-1 for 30 min and lowered it to 2.9 mmol l-1 for a further 30 min. Mean peripheral insulin levels during the insulin infusion arm in comparison with the tolbutamide infusion were not significantly different during the euglycaemic plateau: 106 +/- 4 vs 77 +/- 15 mU l-1 (mean +/- SEM) (mean difference 29 mU l-1, 95% CI -22 to 80; p = NS) but were greater during the hypoglycaemic plateau: 106 +/- 3.5 vs 21.0 +/- 4.0 mU l-1 (mean difference 85 mU l-1, 95% CI 72 to 98; p < 0.0001). Portal insulin concentrations, calculated from C-peptide data were not significantly different during the euglycaemic plateau with insulin as compared to tolbutamide. However, during hypoglycaemia portal insulin concentrations were significantly higher 15 min from the start of the plateau, during insulin infusion. During hypoglycaemia induced by either insulin or tolbutamide there were similar peak responses of glucagon: 124 +/- 14 vs 128 +/- 7 ng l-1 (mean difference -4, 95% CI -39 to 31; p = NS) and adrenaline: 2.9 +/- 0.4 vs 2.8 +/- 0.3 nmol l-1, (mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.9 to 1.0; p = NS). Increases in tremor and sweating and deterioration in reaction time were similar during both periods of hypoglycaemia as were increases in total: 18.5 +/- 1.4 vs 19.6 +/- 2.2 (mean difference -1.0, 95% CI -3.8 to 1.8; p = NS) and autonomic: 8.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.3 (mean difference -1.1, 95% CI -5.9 to 3.6; p = NS) symptom scores. We conclude that there is no difference in the glucagon, sympathoadrenal, cognitive or symptomatic response during hypoglycaemia induced by either insulin or tolbutamide. This suggests that the different insulin concentrations produced by these contrasting models of hypoglycaemia had no effect on the physiological response and patients taking sulphonylureas can be expected to develop similar warning symptoms to those on insulin.

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cognition; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epinephrine; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Insulin, Regular, Pork; Male; Reaction Time; Recombinant Proteins; Sweating; Tolbutamide; Tremor

1996