buspirone has been researched along with Depression, Involutional in 32 studies
Buspirone: An anxiolytic agent and serotonin receptor agonist belonging to the azaspirodecanedione class of compounds. Its structure is unrelated to those of the BENZODIAZAPINES, but it has an efficacy comparable to DIAZEPAM.
buspirone : An azaspiro compound that is 8-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7,9-dione substituted at the nitrogen atom by a 4-(piperazin-1-yl)butyl group which in turn is substituted by a pyrimidin-2-yl group at the N(4) position.
Depression, Involutional: Form of depression in those MIDDLE AGE with feelings of ANXIETY.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" Data were derived from an earlier study, designed to compare efficacy and tolerability of fixed dosage of extended-release venlafaxine, mitazapine, paroxetine, and risperidone, sodium valproate, buspirone, trazodone or thyroid hormone augmenting to paroxetine in those patients." | 2.78 | Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: a report of OPERATION study. ( Cao, L; Chen, J; Fang, Y; Hong, W; Peng, D; Wu, Z; Yuan, C; Zhang, C, 2013) |
" There was no statistical significance among treatment arms in remission rates, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events." | 2.76 | A pilot study of the efficacy and safety of paroxetine augmented with risperidone, valproate, buspirone, trazodone, or thyroid hormone in adult Chinese patients with treatment-resistant major depression. ( Calabrese, JR; Cao, L; Chen, J; Cui, X; Fang, Y; Gao, K; Hong, W; Jiang, K; Wang, Y; Wu, Z; Xu, Y; Yi, Z; Yuan, C, 2011) |
"Attrition rates are high during treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), and patients who drop out are less likely to reach remission." | 2.74 | What predicts attrition in second step medication treatments for depression?: a STAR*D Report. ( Balasubramani, GK; Kornstein, SG; Lesser, IM; Nierenberg, AA; Preskorn, SH; Rush, AJ; Shores-Wilson, K; Thase, ME; Trivedi, MH; Warden, D; Wisniewski, SR; Young, EA, 2009) |
"Buspirone plasma levels were not measured." | 2.73 | Interaction between serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and beta-endorphins modulates antidepressant response. ( Gastó, C; Gómez-Gil, E; Martín-Santos, R; Martínez de Osaba, MJ; Navinés, R, 2008) |
"Major depressive disorder is a severe, disabling disorder that affects around 4." | 2.61 | Monoaminergic system and depression. ( Berrocoso, E; González-Saiz, F; Mico, JA; Perez-Caballero, L; Romero-López-Alberca, C; Torres-Sanchez, S, 2019) |
"Augmentation strategies for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) are needed when patients with MDD have not tolerated or responded to antidepressant monotherapies." | 1.34 | Augmentation strategies to increase antidepressant efficacy. ( Shelton, RC, 2007) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (3.13) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 14 (43.75) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 17 (53.13) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Bang-Andersen, B | 1 |
Ruhland, T | 1 |
Jørgensen, M | 1 |
Smith, G | 1 |
Frederiksen, K | 1 |
Jensen, KG | 1 |
Zhong, H | 1 |
Nielsen, SM | 1 |
Hogg, S | 1 |
Mørk, A | 1 |
Stensbøl, TB | 1 |
Perez-Caballero, L | 1 |
Torres-Sanchez, S | 1 |
Romero-López-Alberca, C | 1 |
González-Saiz, F | 1 |
Mico, JA | 1 |
Berrocoso, E | 1 |
Targum, SD | 3 |
Wedel, PC | 3 |
Robinson, J | 1 |
Daniel, DG | 1 |
Busner, J | 1 |
Bleicher, LS | 2 |
Rauh, P | 1 |
Barlow, C | 2 |
Wu, Z | 2 |
Chen, J | 2 |
Yuan, C | 2 |
Hong, W | 2 |
Peng, D | 1 |
Zhang, C | 1 |
Cao, L | 2 |
Fang, Y | 2 |
McAllister-Williams, RH | 1 |
Alhaj, HA | 1 |
Massey, A | 1 |
Pankiv, J | 1 |
Reckermann, U | 1 |
Cubała, WJ | 1 |
Landowski, J | 1 |
Fava, M | 8 |
Damulin, IV | 1 |
Suvorova, IA | 1 |
Kirilly, E | 1 |
Gonda, X | 1 |
Bagdy, G | 1 |
Biard, K | 1 |
Douglass, AB | 1 |
De Koninck, J | 1 |
Preskorn, SH | 2 |
Warden, D | 3 |
Rush, AJ | 5 |
Wisniewski, SR | 4 |
Lesser, IM | 1 |
Kornstein, SG | 1 |
Balasubramani, GK | 1 |
Thase, ME | 4 |
Nierenberg, AA | 4 |
Young, EA | 1 |
Shores-Wilson, K | 2 |
Trivedi, MH | 4 |
Navinés, R | 4 |
Martín-Santos, R | 4 |
Gómez-Gil, E | 4 |
Martínez de Osaba, MJ | 3 |
Gastó, C | 4 |
Kuloglu, M | 1 |
Ekinci, O | 1 |
Caykoylu, A | 1 |
Papakostas, GI | 1 |
Chuzi, SE | 1 |
Sousa, JL | 1 |
Laje, G | 1 |
Perlis, RH | 2 |
McMahon, FJ | 1 |
Xu, Y | 1 |
Yi, Z | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Jiang, K | 1 |
Cui, X | 1 |
Calabrese, JR | 1 |
Gao, K | 1 |
Bech, P | 1 |
Gaynes, BN | 1 |
Dusetzina, SB | 1 |
Ellis, AR | 1 |
Hansen, RA | 1 |
Farley, JF | 1 |
Miller, WC | 1 |
Stürmer, T | 1 |
Carter, TA | 1 |
Hen, R | 1 |
Gage, FH | 1 |
Uher, R | 1 |
Perroud, N | 1 |
Pavlovic, ZM | 1 |
Landén, M | 2 |
Högberg, P | 1 |
Quitkin, F | 1 |
Ritz, L | 1 |
Lebowitz, BD | 1 |
Biggs, MM | 2 |
Luther, JF | 2 |
Williams, SC | 1 |
Imaz, ML | 2 |
Friedman, ES | 1 |
McGrath, PJ | 1 |
Niederehe, G | 1 |
Hollon, SD | 1 |
de Osaba, MJ | 1 |
Escolar, G | 1 |
Shelton, RC | 1 |
Eriksson, E | 1 |
Agren, H | 1 |
Fahlén, T | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vortioxetine Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in Type 2 Diabetes: Role of Inflammation, Kynurenine Pathway, and Structural and Functional Brain Connectivity as Biomarkers[NCT03580967] | Phase 4 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-07-01 | Withdrawn (stopped due to COVID-19 Pandemic interfered with Pt recruitment) | ||
Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Adolescent Depression (STAR-AD) a Multicentre Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol[NCT05814640] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 520 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-02-20 | Recruiting | ||
Vortioxetine for Menopausal Depression and Associated Symptoms[NCT02234362] | Phase 4 | 47 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-12 | Completed | ||
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of add-on Sarcosine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04975100] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-08-26 | Completed | ||
Bipolar Disorder and Oxidative Stress Injury Mechanism - Clinical Big Data Analysis Based on Machine Learning[NCT03949218] | 3,702 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2018-11-20 | Completed | |||
Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression[NCT00021528] | Phase 4 | 4,000 participants | Interventional | 2001-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Investigate Rapid Antidepressant Effects of Leucine[NCT03079297] | Phase 2 | 16 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-03-09 | Terminated (stopped due to Covid-19) | ||
Treating Comorbid Depression During Care Transitions Using Relational Agents[NCT02845102] | 4 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-08-31 | Completed | |||
Conscious Dying/Conscious Living: Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) for Patients at End of Life-A Pilot Study for Palliative and Hospice Care[NCT05214417] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-05-01 | Not yet recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Anxiety was measured by self-report responses to Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). It is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory that is used for measuring the severity of anxiety in children and adults. Several studies have found the Beck Anxiety Inventory to be an accurate measure of anxiety symptoms in children and adults. Higher scores on the BAI indicate more anxiety symptoms. The range of BAI scores is from 0 to 63, with 0-9=Minimal anxiety, 10-16=Mild anxiety, 17-29=Moderate anxiety, and 30-63=Severe anxiety. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -7 |
Fatigue symptoms were assessed by the Clinical Global Impression-Fatigue (CGI-F) scale.The CGI-F is a single item global assessment scales to specifically evaluate symptoms of fatigue. Higher scores indicate more fatigue symptoms. The range of scores is from 0-7. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -1 |
Severity of illness was assessed by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. The range of scores is 0-7. Higher scores indicate greater severity of illness. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -1 |
Cognition and physical functioning was measured by self-report responses to Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ).The range of scores is from 7-42. Higher scores indicate lower cognitive and executive functioning. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -13 |
"Processing speed, working memory, visuospatial processing and attention was assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST).~The DSST test requires the examinee to transcribe a unique geometric symbol with its corresponding Arabic number. The examinee is initially shown a key containing the numbers from 1 to 9. Under each number there is a corresponding geometric symbol. The examinee is then shown a series of boxes containing numbers in the top boxes, and blank boxes below them. After a short practice trial, they are then asked to copy the corresponding geometric symbol under each number. The raw score is the number of correct items completed within the prescribed time limit. Higher scores indicate faster processing speed, working memory, and visuospatial processing and attention. The range of scores is 0-63." (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | 8.5 |
"Menopause related symptoms were assessed using the Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS). The Greene Scale provides a brief measure of menopause symptoms. It can be used to assess changes in different symptoms, before and after menopause treatment. Three main areas are measured:~1. Psychological (items 1-11). 2. Physical (items 12-18). 3. Vasomotor (items 19, 20).~A higher score indicates that menopause symptoms are more bothersome. The range of scores is from 0 to 63." (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -18.5 |
"Quality of life, menopause-specific, is assessed by the Menopause Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL).~The MENQOL is self-administered and consists of a total of 29 items in a Likert-scale format. Each item assesses the impact of one of four domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last month: vasomotor (items 1-3), psychosocial (items 4-10), physical (items 11-26), and sexual (items 27-29). Items pertaining to a specific symptom are rated as present or not present, and if present, how bothersome on a zero (not bothersome) to six (extremely bothersome) scale. Means are computed for each subscale by dividing the sum of the domain's items by the number of items within that domain. Non-endorsement of an item is scored a 1 and endorsement a 2, plus the number of the particular rating, so that the possible score on any item ranges from 1-8. Total score also ranges from 1-8. Higher scores indicate that menopause symptoms are more bothersome." (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -1.74 |
The efficacy of vortioxetine for trea-ting depressive symptoms was measured by mean change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression score from Baseline (Visit 1) to Week 8 (Visit 5). The MADRS score was assessed at every study visit (Visits 1-5). Participants were considered to have responded to vortioxetine if their MADRS score was reduced by 50% or more from baseline to the end of treatment, and to be in remission if their final MADRS score was less than 10. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression. The overall MADRS score ranges from 0 to 60. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -22.8 |
Pain symptoms were assessed by the Pain Assessment (PEG). The PEG is a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. A higher score indicates more pain symptoms. The range of scores is from 0 to 30. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -4 |
Sleep quality and disturbances during the past month were assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI also incorporates daytime functioning into the total score. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. The range of scores is 0-21. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -5 |
Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) were tracked and quantified prospectively using a daily hot flash diary. The hot flash diary was adapted from a 7-day self-report tool for vasomotor symptoms originally developed by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diary asks for the subject to log number of hot flashes during the day and night, severity of hot flashes during day and night, and how bothersome the hot flashes were during day and night. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | hot flashes per day (Mean) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -1.33 |
Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) were tracked and quantified prospectively using a daily hot flash diary. The hot flash diary was adapted from a 7-day self-report tool for vasomotor symptoms originally developed by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diary asks for the subject to log number of hot flashes during the day and night, severity of hot flashes during day and night, and how bothersome the hot flashes were during day and night. (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | hot flashes per night (Mean) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -1.15 |
"Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) were tracked and quantified prospectively using a daily hot flash diary. The hot flash diary was adapted from a 7-day self-report tool for vasomotor symptoms originally developed by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diary asks for the subject to log number of hot flashes during the day and night, severity of hot flashes during day and night, and how bothersome the hot flashes were during day and night.~Severity of VMS:~The range of scores for severity of VMS is 0-2, with higher scores indicating greater severity. 0=mild, 1=moderate, 2=severe" (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -0.28 |
"Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) were tracked and quantified prospectively using a daily hot flash diary. The hot flash diary was adapted from a 7-day self-report tool for vasomotor symptoms originally developed by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diary asks for the subject to log number of hot flashes during the day and night, severity of hot flashes during day and night, and how bothersome the hot flashes were during day and night.~Severity of VMS:~The range of scores for severity of VMS is 0-2, with higher scores indicating greater severity. 0=mild, 1=moderate, 2=severe" (NCT02234362)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8 (Visit 5)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Open-label Vortioxetine | -0.27 |
"The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-report (QIDS-SR), self-report is a 16-item measure of depression severity that includes the 9 criterion symptoms for MDD. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 3 (total score range, 0-27). Totals scores of ≤ 5 indicate no depression; 6-10 indicates mild depression; 11-15 indicates moderate depression; 16-20 indicates severe depression; and ≥ 21 indicates very severe depression. For purposes of this report, severe and very severe categories were combined as severe to very severe depression (≥ 16). The QIDS-A self-report has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 days
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
L-leucine | -6 |
Maltodextrin | -8 |
"Response criteria defined based on QIDS-SR score at baseline and 14 days after treatment initiation.~The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-report (QIDS-SR), self-report is a 16-item measure of depression severity that includes the 9 criterion symptoms for MDD. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 3 (total score range, 0-27). Totals scores of ≤ 5 indicate no depression; 6-10 indicates mild depression; 11-15 indicates moderate depression; 16-20 indicates severe depression; and ≥ 21 indicates very severe depression. For purposes of this report, severe and very severe categories were combined as severe to very severe depression (≥ 16). The QIDS-A self-report has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 14 days
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
L-leucine | 0 |
Maltodextrin | 50 |
"Remission operationalized as QIDS-SR <=5.~The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-report (QIDS-SR), self-report is a 16-item measure of depression severity that includes the 9 criterion symptoms for MDD. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 3 (total score range, 0-27). Totals scores of ≤ 5 indicate no depression; 6-10 indicates mild depression; 11-15 indicates moderate depression; 16-20 indicates severe depression; and ≥ 21 indicates very severe depression. For purposes of this report, severe and very severe categories were combined as severe to very severe depression (≥ 16). The QIDS-A self-report has demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: 14 days
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
L-leucine | 0 |
Maltodextrin | 25 |
"Anhedonia will be measured using Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS).~The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is a 14-item scale that measures anhedonia, the inability to experience pleasure. The items cover the domains of: social interaction, food and drink, sensory experience, and interest/pastimes. A score of 2 or less constitutes a normal score, while an abnormal score is defined as 3 or more. Each item has four possible responses: strongly disagree, disagree, agree, or strongly agree. Either of the disagree responses score one point, and either of the agree responses score 0 points. Thus, the final score ranges from 0 to 14." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Anhedonia 3 days Change | Anhedonia 7 days Change | Anhedonia 14 days Change | |
L-leucine | -0.21 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Maltodextrin | -0.46 | -1.46 | -2.21 |
"Fatigue will be measured with Multidimensional fatigue inventory~The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue. It contains five scales: general fatigue (items 1, 5, 12, 16), mental fatigue (items 7, 11, 13, 19), physical fatigue (items 2, 8, 14, 20), reduced motivation (items 4, 9, 15, 18) and reduced activity (items 3, 6, 10, 17). Items are scored on a 5-point scale on which the participant expressed the degree to which the statement applied to him or her (from agreement yes, that is true to disagreement no, that is not true) in the previous days. Item scores are summed to create a sum score for each scale, ranging between 4 (best condition) and 20 (worst condition). Higher scores indicate more fatigue." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General fatigue 3 days Change | General fatigue 7 days Change | General fatigue 14 days Change | Mental fatigue 3 days Change | Mental fatigue 7 days Change | Mental fatigue 14 days Change | Physical fatigue 3 days Change | Physical fatigue 7 days Change | Physical fatigue 14 days Change | Reduced motivation 3 days Change | Reduced motivation 7 days Change | Reduced motivation 14 days Change | Reduced activity 3 days Change | Reduced activity 7 days Change | Reduced activity 14 days Change | |
L-leucine | -1.59 | -3.59 | -0.74 | -2.36 | -1.02 | -3.46 | -3.58 | 0.09 | -2.55 | -.032 | -0.71 | -5.51 | -2.80 | -4.14 | -4.47 |
Maltodextrin | -0.70 | -3.20 | -3.70 | -0.71 | -4.71 | -3.96 | -0.55 | -1.80 | -3.80 | -0.26 | -1.26 | -2.76 | -0.47 | -3.97 | -8.14 |
"Psychosocial function will be measured using Work and Social Adjustment Scale~The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a 5-item measure for impairment in functioning. Items are scored on an 8-point scale on how much participants' problems impaired their ability to carry out the activity (from Not at all to Very severely). Item scores are summed to create a sum score. The maximum score of the WSAS is 40, lower scores are better. A WSAS score above 20 appears to suggest moderately severe or worse psychopathology. Scores between 10 and 20 are associated with significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology. Scores below 10 appear to be associated with subclinical populations." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Psychosocial function 3 days Change | Psychosocial function7 days Change | Psychosocial function 14 days Change | |
L-leucine | 1.49 | -1.18 | -9.38 |
Maltodextrin | -2.57 | -7.57 | -7.32 |
"Adverse effect burden will be measured with Frequency Intensity and Burden of Side-effect rating scale (FIBSER).~The Frequency, Intensity, Burden of Side Effects Rating (FIBSER) scale was designed by Dr. Stephen Wisniewski for use in the U.S. STAR*D effectiveness study. It is a 3-item scale to assess side effects from antidepressant treatment. To use the FIBSER in measurement-based care, clinicians should consider item 3 (Burden). If the score is 0 to 2 (None to Mild interference with activities), no change in medication is needed. If the score is 3-4 (Moderate to Marked interference with activites), the side effects need to be addressed (i.e., change in dose, side effect antidote, etc). If the score is 5-6 (Severe interference with activities or Unable to Function), the dose needs to be decreased or the medication needs to be switched." (NCT03079297)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Adverse effect burden 3 days Change | Adverse effect burden function 7 days Change | Adverse effect burden function 14 days Change | |
L-leucine | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Maltodextrin | 0 | 0 | -.25 |
3 reviews available for buspirone and Depression, Involutional
Article | Year |
---|---|
Monoaminergic system and depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Biogenic Monoamines; Buspirone; Depressive Disorder, Ma | 2019 |
[The current concept of augmentation of treatment efficiency with antidepressant medication].
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Buspirone; Clinical Trials as Topic; Depressive Disorder | 2015 |
[Antidepressants, stressors and the serotonin 1A receptor].
Topics: Animals; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Buspirone; Depression; Depressive Disorder; Dep | 2015 |
17 trials available for buspirone and Depression, Involutional
Article | Year |
---|---|
A comparative analysis between site-based and centralized ratings and patient self-ratings in a clinical trial of Major Depressive Disorder.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Antidepressive Agents; Buspirone; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Met | 2013 |
Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: a report of OPERATION study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Buspirone; China; Comorbidity; Cy | 2013 |
Prolactin response to buspirone is not impaired in drug-naïve first episode patients with major depressive disorder.
Topics: Adult; Buspirone; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depressive Disorder | 2014 |
Changes in cognitive symptoms after a buspirone-melatonin combination treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.
Topics: Acute Disease; Antioxidants; Buspirone; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blin | 2015 |
What predicts attrition in second step medication treatments for depression?: a STAR*D Report.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; | 2009 |
Interaction between serotonin 5-HT1A receptors and beta-endorphins modulates antidepressant response.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; beta-Endorphin; Buspirone; Case-Control Studies; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, | 2008 |
5HT1A-mediated stimulation of cortisol release in major depression: use of non-invasive cortisol measurements to predict clinical response.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Buspirone; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Female; Follow-Up Studie | 2010 |
Pharmacogenetics studies in STAR*D: strengths, limitations, and results.
Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Comorbidity; Cycl | 2009 |
A pilot study of the efficacy and safety of paroxetine augmented with risperidone, valproate, buspirone, trazodone, or thyroid hormone in adult Chinese patients with treatment-resistant major depression.
Topics: Buspirone; China; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Co | 2011 |
Outcomes on the pharmacopsychometric triangle in bupropion-SR vs. buspirone augmentation of citalopram in the STAR*D trial.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopr | 2012 |
Treating depression after initial treatment failure: directly comparing switch and augmenting strategies in STAR*D.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; | 2012 |
An exploratory study of combination buspirone and melatonin SR in major depressive disorder (MDD): a possible role for neurogenesis in drug discovery.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Buspirone; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major | 2012 |
Incidence of sexual side effects in refractory depression during treatment with citalopram or paroxetine.
Topics: Buspirone; Citalopram; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; F | 2005 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.
Topics: Adult; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Do | 2006 |
Effects of citalopram treatment on hypothermic and hormonal responses to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone in patients with major depression and therapeutic response.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-G | 2007 |
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.
Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behaviora | 2007 |
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.
Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behaviora | 2007 |
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.
Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behaviora | 2007 |
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.
Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Antidepressive Agents; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behaviora | 2007 |
Effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Buspirone; Citalopram; Depressive Dis | 1999 |
12 other studies available for buspirone and Depression, Involutional
Article | Year |
---|---|
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Discovery of 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)phenyl]piperazine (Lu AA21004): a novel multimodal compound for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Cell Line; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Partial Agonism; Drug St | 2011 |
Somatodendritic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) autoreceptor function in major depression as assessed using the shift in electroencephalographic frequency spectrum with buspirone.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Autoreceptors; Buspirone; Cohort Studies; Depressive Disorder, Major; El | 2014 |
The effects of galantamine and buspirone on sleep structure: Implications for understanding sleep abnormalities in major depression.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Buspirone; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Depressive Disorder, | 2015 |
How multiple medication use evolves and the importance of therapeutic trials: the slippery slide.
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Asthma; Broncho | 2008 |
Venlafaxine-associated nocturnal bruxism in a depressive patient successfully treated with buspirone.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Buspirone; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder, Majo | 2010 |
Do suicidal thoughts or behaviors recur during a second antidepressant treatment trial?
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behavio | 2012 |
Buspirone to improve compliance in venlafaxine-induced movement disorder.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Buspirone; Compliance; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder, | 2004 |
Depression--augmentation or switch after initial SSRI treatment.
Topics: Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Ther | 2006 |
An increased hypothermic response to buspirone in patients with major depression.
Topics: Adult; Buspirone; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depressive Disorder, Major; Female; | 2006 |
Hormonal response to buspirone is not impaired in major depression.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Buspirone; Case-Control Studie | 2007 |
The combination of buspirone and bupropion in the treatment of depression.
Topics: Bupropion; Buspirone; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combinat | 2007 |
Augmentation strategies to increase antidepressant efficacy.
Topics: Algorithms; Bupropion; Buspirone; Citalopram; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therap | 2007 |