buprenorphine has been researched along with Osteoarthritis--Knee* in 5 studies
4 trial(s) available for buprenorphine and Osteoarthritis--Knee
Article | Year |
---|---|
Transdermal buprenorphine plus oral paracetamol vs an oral codeine-paracetamol combination for osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee: a randomised trial.
Low-dose transdermal opioids offer a new therapeutic option for osteoarthritis (OA). This study compared symptom relief obtained with buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol with that obtained with an oral codeine-paracetamol combination tablet (co-codamol) in older adults with OA.. Two hundred and twenty people (aged ≥60 years) with OA hip and/or knee pain were randomised to treatment with 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol (5-25 μg/h buprenorphine patches plus 1000 mg oral paracetamol q.i.d. (4 times daily); n=110) or co-codamol tablets (two 8/500-two 30/500 mg tablets q.i.d.; n=110). They entered a titration period of up to 10 weeks, during which their dose of study medication was adjusted until they reached optimum pain control. Patients who achieved optimum pain control entered a 12-week assessment period. The primary outcome was average daily pain scores recorded using the box scale-11 (BS-11) pain scale.. Both treatments significantly reduced patient pain scores. The estimated treatment difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] was -0.02 (-0.64, 0.60) for the per protocol (PP) population. The results were similar for the full analysis population. Patients receiving 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol needed significantly less escape medication (ibuprofen) than those receiving co-codamol tablets (P=0.002; PP population). Less than 10% of patients in the 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol group were receiving the highest dose level at the end of the study, compared with 34% in the co-codamol group. Withdrawal rates were high in both groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the groups (86.4% of patients in the 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol group; 81.7% in the co-codamol group). Six serious AEs were reported in three patients (2.7%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol group and one (0.9%) in the co-codamol group.. 7-day buprenorphine patches plus oral paracetamol were non-inferior to co-codamol tablets with respect to analgesic efficacy in older adults with OA pain in the hip/knee. Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Codeine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Measurement; Treatment Outcome | 2011 |
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine (BuTrans seven-day patches) with buprenorphine sublingual tablets (Temgesic) in patients with osteoarthritis pain.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain, particularly in the older population. Modern approaches to the management of OA pain recommend tailoring treatment to the individual. This study examines treatment options for OA pain in the form of low-dose transdermal and sublingual opioid analgesia.. The aims of this trial were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (BuTrans, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited UK) with sublingual buprenorphine (Temgesic, Schering-Plough Limited UK) in patients with moderate to severe pain caused by OA of the hip(s) and/or knee(s), and to establish analgesic equivalence of the two products.. Two hundred forty-six patients with OA pain in the hip(s) and/or knee(s) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study; 110 completed the study. Patients were randomized to receive transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/hour) or sublingual buprenorphine (200 and 400 microg tablets). Their medication was titrated to pain control and they were treated for up to seven weeks. The main outcome measures were pain intensity (primary outcome), sleep disturbance, quality of life, and safety assessments.. Patients' Box Scale-11 pain scores decreased between entry and assessment in both treatment groups. During the 28-day assessment period, the estimated mean treatment differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.00 (-0.68,0.69), -0.11 (-0.85,0.63), and -0.13 (-0.95,0.68), for the morning, midday, and evening scores, respectively. All the confidence intervals were within the prespecified limits for equivalence (-1.5, 1.5). Use of escape medication was low. In both treatment groups, sleep disturbance caused by pain decreased between entry and assessment. Patients' quality of life improved during the study. Significantly fewer patients receiving the transdermal buprenorphine patches reported nausea (P=0.035), dizziness (P=0.026), and vomiting (P=0.039).. In conclusion, seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches are as effective as sublingual buprenorphine, with a better tolerability profile. Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Sublingual; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain; Pain Measurement; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome | 2010 |
Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, pa
This study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches and prolonged-release tramadol tablets in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain of the hip and/or knee.. Eligible patients were adults with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, as confirmed by a mean Box Scale 11 (BS-11) score >or=4 while using paracetamol 4000 mg/d for pain during the screening week. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches (patch strengths of 5, 10, and 20 microg/h, with a maximum dosage of 20 microg/h) or twice-daily prolonged-release tramadol tablets (tablet strengths of 75, 100, 150, and 200 mg, with a maximum dosage of 400 mg/d) over a 12-week open-label treatment period. Supplementary paracetamol was available as rescue medication throughout the study. The primary end point was the difference in BS-11 scores from baseline to the completion of treatment. Noninferiority was assumed if the treatment difference on the BS-11 scale was -1.5 boxes, indicating a clinically meaningful result. Secondary efficacy variables were rescue medication use, sleep disturbance and quality of sleep, and patients' and investigators' global assessments of pain relief. In addition, patient preference was assessed at the completion visit by asking patients whether, given equal pain relief, they would prefer basic treatment for OA pain with a patch applied once weekly or a tablet taken twice daily. Exploratory variables included investigators' assessments of patients' pain, stiffness, and ability to perform daily activities (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index); patients' quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D health states index and EuroQol visual analog scale); and abuse and diversion of study drug.. One hundred thirty-four patients (69 receiving 7-day buprenorphine patches and 65 receiving tramadol tablets) were randomized and received >or=1 dose of study medication. A respective 98.6% and 100% of the 2 treatment groups were white, with mean (SD) ages of 64.4 (11.1) and 64.2 (9.3) years. Both treatments were associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain from baseline to study completion. The least squares mean change from baseline in BS-11 scores in the 7-day buprenorphine patch and tramadol tablet groups was -2.26 (95% CI, -2.76 to -1.76) and -2.09 (95% CI, -2.61 to -1.58). The efficacy of 7-day buprenorphine patches was noninferior to that of prolonged-release tramadol tablets. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the 2 treatment groups: 226 AEs were reported in 61 patients (88.4%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group, and 152 AEs were reported in 51 patients (78.5%) in the tramadol group. Ten patients (14.5%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 19 (29.2%) in the tramadol tablet group withdrew from the study due to AEs. The most common AEs in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group were nausea (30.4%), constipation (18.8%), and dizziness (15.9%); the most common AEs in the tramadol tablet group were nausea (24.6%), fatigue (18.5%), and pain (12.3%). Most patients (47/67 [70.1%] in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 43/61 [70.5%] in the tramadol tablet group) reported that they would prefer a 7-day patch to a twice-daily tablet for future pain treatment.. In these patients with chronic, moderate to severe OA pain of the hip and/or knee, 7-day low-dose buprenorphine patches were an effective and well-tolerated analgesic. The buprenorphine patches were noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol tablets. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number: 2006-003233-32. Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Chronic Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain; Pain Measurement; Patient Satisfaction; Radiography; Sleep; Sweden; Tablets; Time Factors; Tramadol; Treatment Outcome | 2009 |
[Treatment of chronic osteoarthritis pain: effectivity and safety of a 7 day matrix patch with a low dose buprenorphine].
Patients with osteoarthritis often suffer from chronic pain. If pain treatment with NSAIDS and coxibes is no longer indicated, a constant and user friendly opioid analgesia can be achieved with a low dose buprenorphine patch being applicated using an interval of 7 days. The use of this matrix patch was evaluated in a multicenter observational study on 4263 patients in clinical practice. During treatment a significant decrease of mean pain intensity on a 11-point scale could be observed from 6.9 points before using the patch to 2.9 points at the end of observation. Further effects were a decrease of additional analgetic medication and an improvement of aspects of life quality, e.g. mobility and quality of sleep. Only in 4.5% of the patients adverse effects were observed, reflecting the expected range of adverse effects of opioids. Thus it could be demonstrated that the use of the transdermal patch is an effective, user friendly and safe way of chronic pain relief for osteoarthritis patients. Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Sublingual; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Measurement; Prospective Studies | 2008 |
1 other study(ies) available for buprenorphine and Osteoarthritis--Knee
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comments on the article by Conaghan et al.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Analgesics; Buprenorphine; Codeine; Female; Humans; Male; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee | 2012 |