buprenorphine and HIV-Infections

People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately burdened by HIV. The United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued guidelines for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) indication. We know little about PrEP for people receiving medication for OUD. The objective of this study is to report PrEP indication, awareness, and uptake in patients engaged in outpatient OUD treatment with buprenorphine.. Adult patients (n = 137) receiving buprenorphine for OUD at an outpatient substance use disorder treatment clinic completed a cross-sectional survey between July and September 2019. The study determined PrEP indication by 2017 CDC criteria. PrEP awareness and uptake were self-reported. The study assessed statistical differences in PrEP indicators by Pearson's χ. Nearly three-quarters (73.7%, n = 101) of the study sample met CDC criteria for PrEP-indication based on past-year risk behaviors. Ninety-five percent of these participants reported inconsistent condom use, 21.0% engaged in commercial sex, 9.0% shared injection equipment, 8.9% reported a recent bacterial STI, and 4.0% had an HIV+ sexual partner. Of PrEP indicated participants (n = 101), 19 had heard of PrEP prior to the survey, but only 1 participant reported past-year PrEP use.. Among a clinical population of people receiving buprenorphine for OUD, HIV risk behaviors were common, yet PrEP awareness and uptake were low. People engaged in treatment for OUD remain at high risk for HIV and are a priority population for PrEP. In light of the current opioid crisis, more research is needed to guide the integration of comprehensive HIV prevention into outpatient opioid treatment centers.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Cross-Sectional Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Sex Work

People infected with HIV through injection drug use are more likely to experience progression to AIDS, death due to AIDS, and all-cause mortality even when controlling for access to care and antiretroviral therapy. While high-risk behavior and concurrent infections most certainly are contributors, chronic immune activation, downstream metabolic comorbidities may play an important role.. Altered intestinal integrity plays a major role in HIV-related immune activation and microbial translocation markers are heightened in active heroin users. Additionally, greater injection frequency drives systemic inflammation and is associated with HIV viral rebound. Finally, important systemic inflammation markers have been linked with frailty and mortality in people who inject drugs with and without concurrent HIV infection. Heroin use may work synergistically with HIV infection to cause greater immune activation than either factor alone. Further research is needed to understand the impact on downstream metabolic comorbidities including cardiovascular disease. Medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder with methadone or buprenorphine may ameliorate some of this risk; however, there is presently limited research in humans, including in non-HIV populations, describing changes in immune activation on these treatments which is of paramount importance for those with HIV infection.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Cardiovascular Diseases; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Methadone; Opioid Epidemic; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Recent HIV outbreaks have occurred as a result of the current US opioid epidemic. Providing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone is essential to achieving optimal HIV treatment outcomes including viral suppression and retention in treatment. This review describes the pharmacology of MOUD with specific attention to interactions with antiretroviral therapy, and to the effect of MOUD on HIV treatment outcomes.. Methadone and buprenorphine both improve HIV viral suppression, adherence to antiretroviral therapy, and overall mortality for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Extended-release naltrexone has been most extensively studied in persons with HIV leaving incarcerated settings, and improves HIV viral suppression in that context. Strategies that integrate MOUD and HIV treatment are crucial to optimize viral suppression. The differing pharmacokinetic and delivery characteristics of these MOUD offer diverse options. Given the chronic and relapsing nature of both HIV and OUD, long-term approaches are required.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Naltrexone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Treatment Outcome

HIV-1 enters the CNS within two weeks after peripheral infection and results in chronic neuroinflammation that leads to HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in more than 50% of infected people. HIV enters the CNS by transmigration of infected monocytes across the blood brain barrier. Intravenous drug abuse is a major risk factor for HIV-1 infection, and opioids have been shown to alter the progression and severity of HAND. Methadone and buprenorphine are opioid derivates that are used as opioid maintenance therapies. They are commonly used to treat opioid dependency in HIV infected substance abusers, but their effects on monocyte migration relevant to the development of cognitive impairment are not well characterized.. Here, we will discuss the effects of opioids and opioid maintenance therapies on the inflammatory functions of monocytes and macrophages that are related to the development of neuroinflammation in the context of HIV infection.

Topics: AIDS Dementia Complex; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood-Brain Barrier; Buprenorphine; Cell Movement; HIV Infections; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Methadone; Monocytes; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people who inject drugs (PWID) frequently encounter barriers accessing and remaining on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Some studies have suggested that opioid substitution therapy (OST) could facilitate PWID's engagement with HIV services. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of concurrent OST use on ART-related outcomes among HIV-infected PWID.. We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Social Policy and Practice databases for studies between 1996 to November 2014 documenting the impact of OST, compared to no OST, on ART outcomes. Outcomes considered were coverage and recruitment onto ART, adherence, viral suppression, attrition from ART, and mortality. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects modeling, and heterogeneity assessed using Cochran Q test and I(2) statistic.. We identified 4685 articles, and 32 studies conducted in North America, Europe, Indonesia, and China were included. OST was associated with a 69% increase in recruitment onto ART (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.15), a 54% increase in ART coverage (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17-2.03), a 2-fold increase in adherence (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.41-3.26), and a 23% decrease in the odds of attrition (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, .63-.95). OST was associated with a 45% increase in odds of viral suppression (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73), but there was limited evidence from 6 studies for OST decreasing mortality for PWID on ART (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, .65-1.25).. These findings support the use of OST, and its integration with HIV services, to improve the HIV treatment and care continuum among HIV-infected PWID.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Infections; Humans; Medication Adherence; Methadone; Odds Ratio; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Publication Bias; Substance-Related Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Evidence-Based Medicine; Harm Reduction; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Medication Adherence; Methadone; Needle Sharing; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Factors; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Tuberculosis; Unsafe Sex

Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is expanding but when used concurrently, problematic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions may occur. Articles published from 1966 to 2012 in Medline were reviewed using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, HCV, HCV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, highly active antiretroviral therapy, drug interactions, methadone and buprenorphine. In addition, a review of abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings was conducted; selected reports were reviewed as well. The metabolism of both opioid and antiretroviral therapies, description of their known interactions and clinical implications and management of these interactions were reviewed. Important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions affecting either methadone or HIV medications have been demonstrated within each class of antiretroviral agents. Drug interactions between methadone, buprenorphine and HIV medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. Clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Receptors, Opioid

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Diffusion of Innovation; HIV Infections; Humans; Physician's Role; Primary Prevention; Substance-Related Disorders

Pregnancy in substance-abusing women with HIV/AIDS presents a complex clinical challenge. Opioid-dependent women need treatment with opioid therapy during pregnancy to protect the health of mother and developing fetus. However, opioid therapies, methadone and buprenorphine, may have drug interactions with some HIV medications that can have adverse effects leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes. Further, many opioid-dependent individuals have problems with other forms of substance abuse, for example, cocaine abuse, that could also contribute to poor clinical outcomes in a pregnant woman. Physiological changes, including increased plasma volume and increased hepatic and renal blood flow, occur in the pregnant woman as the pregnancy progresses and may alter medication needs with the potential to exacerbate drug interactions, although there is sparse literature on this issue. Knowledge of possible drug interactions between opioids, other abused substances such as cocaine, HIV therapeutics, and other frequently required medications such as antibiotics and anticonvulsants is important to assuring the best possible outcomes in the pregnant woman with opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Cocaine; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Substance-Related Disorders

The diversion, misuse, and non-medically supervised use of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone by opioid users are reviewed. Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone are used globally as opioid analgesics and in the treatment of opioid dependency. Diversion of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone represents a complex medical and social issue, and has been widely documented in various geographical regions throughout the world. We first discuss the clinical properties of buprenorphine and its abuse potential. Second, we discuss its diversion and illicit use on an international level, as well as motivations for those activities. Third, we examine the medical risks and benefits of buprenorphine's non-medically supervised use and misuse. These risks and benefits include the effect of buprenorphine's use on HIV risk and the risk of its concomitant use with other medications and drugs of abuse. Finally, we discuss the implications of diversion, misuse, and non-medically supervised use (including potential measures to address issues of diversion); and potential areas for further research.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Overdose; HIV Infections; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Motivation; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking

Injecting drug users are vulnerable to infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and other blood borne viruses as a result of collective use of injecting equipment as well as sexual behaviour. To assess the effect of oral substitution treatment for opioid dependent injecting drug users on risk behaviours and rates of HIV infections. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO to May 2011. We also searched reference lists of articles, reviews and conference abstracts. Studies were required to consider the incidence of risk behaviours, or the incidence of HIV infection related to substitution treatment of opioid dependence. All types of original studies were considered. Two authors independently assessed each study for inclusion. Two authors independently extracted key information from each of the included studies. Any differences were resolved by discussion or by referral to a third author.. Thirty-eight studies, involving some 12,400 participants, were included. The majority were descriptive studies, or randomisation processes did not relate to the data extracted, and most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias. Studies consistently show that oral substitution treatment for opioid-dependent injecting drug users with methadone or buprenorphine is associated with statistically significant reductions in illicit opioid use, injecting use and sharing of injecting equipment. It is also associated with reductions in the proportion of injecting drug users reporting multiple sex partners or exchanges of sex for drugs or money, but has little effect on condom use. It appears that the reductions in risk behaviours related to drug use do translate into reductions in cases of HIV infection. However, because of the high risk of bias and variability in several aspects of the studies, combined totals were not calculated.. Oral substitution treatment for injecting opioid users reduces drug-related behaviours with a high risk of HIV transmission, but has less effect on sex-related risk behaviours. The lack of data from randomised controlled studies limits the strength of the evidence presented in this review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk-Taking; Sexual Behavior; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

To review systematically the evidence on opioid substitution treatment (OST) in prisons in reducing injecting-related human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviours.. Systematic review in accordance with guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. Electronic databases were searched to identify studies of prison-based opioid substitution treatment programmes that included assessment of effects of prison OST on injecting drug use, sharing of needles and syringes and HIV incidence. Published data were used to calculate risk ratios for outcomes of interest. Risk ratios were not pooled due to the low number of studies and differences in study designs.. Five studies were included in the review. Poor follow-up rates were reported in two studies, and representativeness of the sample was uncertain in the remaining three studies. Compared to inmates in control conditions, for treated inmates the risk of injecting drug use was reduced by 55-75% and risk of needle and syringe sharing was reduced by 47-73%. No study reported a direct effect of prison OST on HIV incidence.. There may be a role for OST in preventing HIV transmission in prisons, but methodologically rigorous research addressing this question specifically is required. OST should be implemented in prisons as part of comprehensive HIV prevention programmes that also provide condoms and sterile injecting and tattooing equipment.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Needle Sharing; Prisons; Risk-Taking; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Previous reviews have examined the existence of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for injecting drug users (IDUs) worldwide, but they did not quantify the scale of coverage. We undertook a systematic review to estimate national, regional, and global coverage of HIV services in IDUs.. We did a systematic search of peer-reviewed (Medline, BioMed Central), internet, and grey-literature databases for data published in 2004 or later. A multistage process of data requests and verification was undertaken, involving UN agencies and national experts. National data were obtained for the extent of provision of the following core interventions for IDUs: needle and syringe programmes (NSPs), opioid substitution therapy (OST) and other drug treatment, HIV testing and counselling, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and condom programmes. We calculated national, regional, and global coverage of NSPs, OST, and ART on the basis of available estimates of IDU population sizes.. By 2009, NSPs had been implemented in 82 countries and OST in 70 countries; both interventions were available in 66 countries. Regional and national coverage varied substantially. Australasia (202 needle-syringes per IDU per year) had by far the greatest rate of needle-syringe distribution; Latin America and the Caribbean (0.3 needle-syringes per IDU per year), Middle East and north Africa (0.5 needle-syringes per IDU per year), and sub-Saharan Africa (0.1 needle-syringes per IDU per year) had the lowest rates. OST coverage varied from less than or equal to one recipient per 100 IDUs in central Asia, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa, to very high levels in western Europe (61 recipients per 100 IDUs). The number of IDUs receiving ART varied from less than one per 100 HIV-positive IDUs (Chile, Kenya, Pakistan, Russia, and Uzbekistan) to more than 100 per 100 HIV-positive IDUs in six European countries. Worldwide, an estimated two needle-syringes (range 1-4) were distributed per IDU per month, there were eight recipients (6-12) of OST per 100 IDUs, and four IDUs (range 2-18) received ART per 100 HIV-positive IDUs.. Worldwide coverage of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services in IDU populations is very low. There is an urgent need to improve coverage of these services in this at-risk population.. UN Office on Drugs and Crime; Australian National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales; and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Topics: Africa; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Europe; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Middle East; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle-Exchange Programs; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

While street drugs appear unlikely to alter the metabolism of antiretroviral (ARV) medications, several ARVs may induce or inhibit metabolism of various street drugs. However, research on these interactions is limited. Case reports have documented life-threatening overdoses of ecstasy and gamma-hydroxybutyrate after starting ritonavir, an ARV that inhibits several metabolic enzymes. For opioid addiction, methadone or buprenorphine are the treatments of choice. Because a number of ARVs decrease or increase methadone levels, patients should be monitored for methadone withdrawal or toxicity when they start or stop ARVs. Most ARVs do not cause buprenorphine withdrawal or toxicity, even if they alter buprenorphine levels, with rare exceptions to date including atazanavir/ritonavir associated with significant increases in buprenorphine and adverse events related to sedation and mental status changes in some cases. There are newer medications yet to be studied with methadone or buprenorphine. Further, there are many frequently used medications in treatment of complications of HIV disease that have not been studied. There is need for continuing research to define these drug interactions and their clinical significance.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Ritonavir

We review evidence for effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and coverage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for injecting drug users (IDUs) infected with HIV, with particular attention to low-income and middle-income countries. In these countries, nearly half (47%) of all IDUs infected with HIV are in five nations--China, Vietnam, Russia, Ukraine, and Malaysia. In all five countries, IDU access to ART is disproportionately low, and systemic and structural obstacles restrict treatment access. IDUs are 67% of cumulative HIV cases in these countries, but only 25% of those receiving ART. Integration of ART with opioid substitution and tuberculosis treatment, increased peer engagement in treatment delivery, and reform of harmful policies--including police use of drug-user registries, detention of drug users in centres offering no evidence-based treatment, and imprisonment for possession of drugs for personal use--are needed to improve ART coverage of IDUs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Developing Countries; Drug Costs; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Income; Malaysia; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Narration; Prisoners; Prisons; Russia; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine; Vietnam

Research conducted during the first 20 years of the AIDS epidemic provided a solid foundation of data supporting methadone treatment as HIV prevention. Drug users in methadone treatment were consistently found to reduce the frequency of drug use, risk behaviors, and infections. These data have been consistent over time and across cultural settings and have been used to promote the expansion of drug treatment as a prevention intervention. More recently, data have emerged suggesting the prevention potential of medication-assisted treatments other than methadone (buprenorphine/naloxone and naltrexone). Still, with a few notable exceptions, global drug treatment coverage for opiate injectors remains remarkably low and only a few treatment interventions for stimulant use have shown efficacy in reducing HIV risk. Importantly, more recent data provide support for the role of drug treatment programs in improving access and adherence to antiretroviral treatment and that injection drug users in substance abuse treatment are more likely to achieve sustained viral suppression. While important challenges remain in maximizing its impact, the scientific literature provides strong evidence of the efficacy of drug treatment as an HIV prevention strategy.

Topics: Alcoholism; Buprenorphine; Clinical Protocols; Drug Users; Health Promotion; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Naltrexone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Risk Reduction Behavior; Risk-Taking; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance-Related Disorders

Drug use continues to be a major factor fueling the global epidemic of HIV infection. This article reviews the current literature on the ability of drug treatment programs to reduce HIV transmission among injection and noninjection drug users. Most data come from research on the treatment of opiate dependence and provide strong evidence on the effectiveness of medication-assisted treatment for reducing the frequency of drug use, risk behaviors, and HIV infections. This has been a consistent finding since the epidemic began among diverse populations and cultural settings. Use of medications other than methadone (such as buprenorphine/naloxone and naltrexone) has increased in recent years with promising data on their effectiveness as HIV prevention and as new treatment options for communities heavily affected by opiate use and HIV infection. However, few treatment interventions for stimulant abuse and dependence have shown efficacy in reducing HIV risk. The cumulative literature provides strong support of drug treatment programs for improving access and adherence to antiretroviral treatment. Drug users in substance abuse treatment are significantly more likely to achieve sustained viral suppression, making viral transmission less likely. Although there are challenges to implementing drug treatment programs for maximum impact, the scientific literature leaves no doubt about the effectiveness of drug treatment as an HIV prevention strategy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Guideline Adherence; HIV Infections; Humans; Naltrexone; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sexual Behavior

Opioid substitution treatment (OST) is an effective treatment for heroin dependence. The World Health Organization has recommended that OST be implemented in prisons because of its role in reducing drug injection and associated problems such as HIV transmission. The aim of this paper was to examine the extent to which OST has been implemented in prisons internationally.. Literature review.. As of January 2008, OST had been implemented in prisons in at least 29 countries or territories. For 20 of those countries, the proportion of all prisoners in OST could be calculated, with results ranging from less than 1% to over 14%. At least 37 countries offer OST in community settings, but not prisons.. This study has identified an increase in the international implementation of OST in prisons. However, there remain large numbers of prisoners who are unable to access OST, even in countries that provide such programs. This raises issues of equivalence of care for prisoners and HIV prevention in prisons.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; International Cooperation; Methadone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Patient Care; Prisoners; Prisons

To enquire as to how applicable are the latest developments in pharmacotherapy of substance use disorders (SUDs) to patients in developing countries. We review the latest literature regarding the magnitude of the problem in developing countries. We then present a review of recent developments in pharmacotherapy of SUDs, especially from developing countries. Finally, we discuss the barriers that prevent patients in developing countries from benefiting from these developments.. The problem of SUDs is increasing in developing countries and there is a severe shortage of manpower to manage it. Disulfiram, naltrexone and acamprosate are useful in treating alcohol dependence, and likewise methadone and buprenorphine in treating opioid dependence. Strategies of matching patients to medications and combining the medications have shown promise. There is a parallel benefit of reduction in the risk of HIV spread among injecting drug users. However, many barriers prevent an average patient with SUD from benefiting from these developments.. Medication treatment can improve the outcome of SUDs. Research in this field is catching up in developing countries. However, due to issues of availability, affordability, manpower and governmental policies, a large number of patients in these countries are unable to benefit from recent developments. Urgent efforts are required to fill this gap between research and practice.

Topics: Acamprosate; Alcohol Deterrents; Alcoholism; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Developing Countries; Disulfiram; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Prevalence; Public Policy; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance-Related Disorders; Taurine

In the era of highly effective anti-retroviral therapy (ART), data show a significant difference in treatment outcomes between injecting drug users (IDUs) and non-IDUs. Factors that may contribute to suboptimal treatment outcomes in IDUs include delayed access to ART, competing comorbid diseases, psychosocial barriers and poor long-term adherence to ART. This review describes and compares several studies on adherence to ART and its correlates in HIV-infected individuals in general, then IDUs and finally those IDUs on opioid substitution treatment (OST). It highlights how ongoing drug use or OST can modify the pattern of these correlates. The aim is to extend all the experience acquired from these studies in order to optimise both access to care and adherence in those countries where HIV infection is mainly driven by IDUs and where ART and OST are only starting to be scaled up. The role of OST in fostering access to care and adherence to ART together with the promising results achieved to date using modified directly observed therapy (DOT) programs for patients taking methadone, allow us to emphasize the efficacy of a comprehensive care model which integrates substance dependence treatment, psychiatric treatment, social services, and medical treatment. The review concludes by suggesting areas of future research targeted at improving the understanding of both the role of perceived toxicity and patient-provider relationship for patients on ART and OST.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS are 2 of the most serious yet treatable diseases worldwide. Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV treatment is expanding but when concurrently used, problematic pharmacokinetic drug interactions can occur.. We reviewed English, Spanish, French, and Italian language articles from 1966 to 2005 in Medline using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, HAART, drug interactions, methadone, and buprenorphine. Additionally, we reviewed abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings. Selected references from these articles were reviewed as well.. Clinical case series and carefully controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies have been conducted between methadone and most approved antiretroviral therapies. Important pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been demonstrated within each class of agents, affecting either methadone or antiretroviral agents. Few studies, however, have been conducted with buprenorphine. The metabolism of both therapies, description of the known interactions, and clinical implications and management of these interactions are reviewed.. Certain interactions between methadone and antiretroviral medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. To optimize care, clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone

Historically, China has had extraordinarily high rates of opiate dependence. These rates declined drastically following the 1949 revolution; however, opiate abuse has re-emerged in the late 1980's and has spread quickly since then.. To describe the current situation of opiate addiction and treatments in China and make some suggestions.. A descriptive study based on literature searched from Medline and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (1996 to 2004) and hand-picked references.. The number of registered addicts in 2004 was 1.14 million (more than 75% of them heroin addicts), but the actual number is probably far higher. Opiate abuse contributes substantially to the spread of HIV/AIDS in China, with intravenous drug use the most prevalent route of transmission (51.2%). Currently, the main treatments for opiate dependence in China include short-term detoxification with opiate agonists or non-opiate agents, such as clonidine or lofexidine; Chinese herbal medicine and traditional non-medication treatments are also used. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has not been officially approved by the Chinese government for widespread implementation, but some pilot studies are currently underway.. China faces substantial drug abuse problems that appear to be worsening with time. Opiate dependence is a major threat to the public health and social security of China because of its devastating medical effects, its impact on risk for HIV/AIDS and criminal behaviors, low rates of recovery and high rates of relapse. There is an urgent need to implement MMT and other modern treatments for opiate dependence more widely in China.

Topics: Buprenorphine; China; Clonidine; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Sympatholytics

Injecting drug use is a common mode of transmission among persons with HIV/AIDS. Many HIV-infected patients meet diagnostic criteria for opioid dependence, a chronic and relapsing brain disorder. Most HIV providers, however, receive little training in substance use disorders. Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) has a stabilizing effect on opioid-dependent patients and is associated with greater acceptance of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, higher ARV adherence, and greater engagement in HIV-related health care. Although methadone maintenance has been the OAT gold standard, methadone is available for the treatment of opioid dependence only in strictly regulated narcotic treatment programs. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist approved for the office-based treatment of opioid dependence in 2002, may result in better health and substance use treatment outcomes for patients with HIV disease.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Drug abuse and infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, but, because of medical, social, and legal factors, opiate addiction/dependence is a major obstacle to successful treatment of disease--for example, treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) with highly active antiretroviral therapy. In an effort to improve the opportunity for treatment of drug abuse and HIV infection, the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research, in collaboration with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other agencies, presented a workshop entitled "Buprenorphine in the Primary HIV Care Setting." Participants reviewed and discussed current issues, such as the introduction of and sources for the provision of buprenorphine in HIV primary care settings and strategies for integrating treatment of HIV-infected drug abusers, all of which are covered in this supplement.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Services Research; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Primary Prevention; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; United States

Untreated opioid dependence is a major obstacle to the successful treatment and prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. In this review, we examine the interwoven epidemics of HIV infection and opioid dependence and the emerging role of buprenorphine in improving HIV treatment outcomes among infected individuals, as well as its role in primary and secondary prevention. This article addresses some of the emerging issues about integrating buprenorphine treatment into HIV clinical care settings and the various strategies that must be considered. Specifically, it addresses the role of buprenorphine in improving HIV treatment outcomes through engagement in care, access to antiretroviral therapy and preventive therapies for opportunistic infections, and the potential benefits of and pitfalls in integrating buprenorphine into HIV clinical care settings. We discuss the key research questions regarding buprenorphine in the area of improving HIV treatment outcomes and prevention, including a review of published studies of buprenorphine and antiretroviral treatment and currently ongoing studies, and provide insight into and models for integrating buprenorphine into HIV clinical care settings. Dialogue among practitioners and policy makers in the HIV care and substance abuse communities will facilitate an effective expansion of buprenorphine and ensure that these beneficial outcomes are achieved.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Substance Abuse Detection; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; United States

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HIV Prevention Strategic Plan Through 2005 advocated for increasing the proportion of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and in need of substance abuse treatment who are successfully linked to services for these 2 conditions. There is evidence that integrating care for HIV infection and substance abuse optimizes outcomes for patients with both disorders. Buprenorphine, a recently approved medication for the treatment of opioid dependence in physicians' offices, provides the opportunity to integrate the treatment of HIV infection and substance abuse in one clinical setting, yet little information exists on the models of care that will most successfully facilitate this integration. To promote the uptake of this type of integrated care, the current review provides a description of 4 recently implemented models for combining buprenorphine treatment with HIV primary care: (1) an on-site addiction/HIV specialist treatment model; (2) a HIV primary care physician model; (3) a nonphysician health professional model; and (4) a community outreach model.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Health Resources; Health Services Needs and Demand; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Selection; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Risk Assessment; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

The confluence of the heroin injection epidemic and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection epidemic has increased the call for expanded access to effective treatments for both conditions. Buprenorphine and methadone are now listed on the World Health Organization's Model Essential Drugs List. In France, which has the most extensive experience, buprenorphine has been associated with a dramatic decrease in deaths due to overdose, and buprenorphine diversion appears to be associated with inadequate dosage, social vulnerability, and prescriptions from multiple providers. Other treatment models (in the United States, Australia, Germany, and Italy) and buprenorphine use in specific populations are also reviewed in the present article. In countries experiencing a dual epidemic of heroin use and HIV infection, such as former states of the Soviet Union and other eastern European and Asian countries, access to buprenorphine and methadone may be one potential tool for reducing the spread of HIV infection among injection drug users and for better engaging them in medical care.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Patient Selection; Quality of Health Care; Risk Assessment; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome; World Health Organization

Buprenorphine is used for the treatment of opioid dependence. As the number of persons receiving buprenorphine treatment and antiretroviral therapy continues to grow, so too does the existence and clinical impact of drug interactions between buprenorphine and medications for treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Awareness that such interactions exist may deter some patients and physicians from initiating potentially lifesaving therapy or lead to complications among patients whose treatment is already under way. Complications include nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy and the development of viral resistance. Illicit drug use is a frequent consequence of adverse drug effects experienced by injection drug users. The occurrence of unrecognized drug interactions can lead to unsuccessful therapy for HIV infection and the treatment of substance dependence. The present review is organized to provide a working background of buprenorphine pharmacology. Review of the current state of knowledge regarding specific interactions between buprenorphine and antiretrovirals is followed by a review of the clinical applicability of these interactions.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Refusal

Treatment for substance abuse and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection historically have come from different providers, often in separate locations, and have been reimbursed through separate funding streams. We describe policy and financing challenges faced by health care providers seeking to integrate buprenorphine, a new treatment for opioid dependence, into HIV primary care. Regulatory challenges include licensing and training restrictions imposed by the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 and confidentiality regulations for alcohol and drug treatment records. Potential responses include the development of local training programs and electronic medical records. Addressing the complexity of funding sources for integrated care will require administrative support, up-front investments, and federal and state leadership. A policy and financing research agenda should address evidence gaps in the rationales for regulatory restrictions and should include cost-effectiveness studies that quantify the "value for money" of investments in integrated care to improve health outcomes for HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Financing, Government; Health Care Costs; Health Policy; Health Resources; HIV Infections; Humans; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Quality of Health Care; United States

To examine the role of expanded access to opioid agonist treatment as a means to decrease international HIV transmission.. Review of the English language literature via Medline.. Estimates of prevalence rates for injection drug use, HIV infection and treatment effect sizes for changes in opioid use, opioid injection, needle-sharing, injection-related HIV risk behavior and cost.. An estimated 12.6 million injection drug users internationally accounted for 10% of the 4.2 million new HIV infections in 2003. Ninety-three of the 136 countries (68%) that report injection drug use identify HIV infection related to this behavior. Observational studies of methadone treatment demonstrate decreases in opioid use, opioid injection, needle-sharing and lower rates of HIV prevalence and incidence. The effectiveness of buprenorphine in demonstrating similar findings is expected, although implementations and research are still emerging. The cost-effectiveness of opioid agonist treatment has been established. The barriers to international adoption of opioid agonist treatment, despite the research evidence and international guidelines, are discussed.. Untreated opioid dependence leads to HIV transmission, on an international level. Opioid agonist treatments are associated with reductions in the frequency of opioid use, fewer injections and injection-related HIV risk behaviors and lower rates of HIV prevalence and incidence. Despite international recommendations, treatment for opioid-dependent injection drug users with methadone and buprenorphine is limited. Research, implementation efforts and political strategies to expand access to opioid agonist treatment are needed in order to combat the spread of HIV, especially in the developing world.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Evaluation; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

In the United States, approximately 25% of the 40,000 new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections each year are secondary to injection drug use. Worldwide, there are an estimated 12.6 million injection drug users, and 10% of HIV infections (420,000 infections in 2003) are associated with this practice. Buprenorphine is a new medication used to treat opioid dependence that shows promise for reducing the rate of HIV transmission and improving the care of opioid-dependent patients with HIV infection. Although buprenorphine faces fewer clinical and regulatory barriers than does methadone, the optimal strategy for integration of office-based treatment of opioid dependence and HIV disease is an area of ongoing research. This review addresses the introduction of buprenorphine, in terms of public health, policy, and clinical implications for HIV-infected patients and for HIV care providers.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Substance-Related Disorders

Pharmacotherapy for substance abuse is a rapidly evolving field comprising both old and new effective treatments for substance use. Opiate agonist therapy has been shown to diminish and often eliminate opiate use. This behavior change has resulted in the reduced transmission of many infections, including HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and an enhanced quality of life. For the past 35 years, the provision of opioid agonist therapy has been limited to opioid treatment programmes. Opioid treatment programmes treat approximately 200,000 of the estimated million opiate-addicted individuals in the United States. With the need to increase the number of treatment opportunities available for opioid-dependent patients, Congress passed the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000, which allows for the treatment of opioid dependence using buprenorphine by a properly licensed physician, including HIV primary care physicians. The integration of buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction into HIV primary care thus provides a new treatment paradigm to address substance abuse in patients with HIV and HCV infections.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

The occurrence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and hepatitis C is common in injection drug users, most of whom are opioid dependent. Methadone pharmacotherapy has been the most widely used treatment for opioid addiction in this population. Methadone has significant, adverse drug-drug interactions with many antiretroviral therapeutic agents that can contribute to nonadherence and poor clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. The present article summarizes current knowledge about interactions between methadone and antiretroviral medications. Buprenorphine is the newest agent available for the treatment of opioid dependence and may have fewer adverse interactions with antiretroviral agents. Buprenorphine has a significant pharmacokinetic interaction with efavirenz but no pharmacodynamic interaction; therefore, simultaneous administration of these drugs is not associated with opioid withdrawal, as has been observed with methadone. This promising finding may simplify the treatment of opioid-dependent patients with HIV disease and should also improve clinical outcomes for persons coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Drug Evaluation; Drug Interactions; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Protease Inhibitors; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Buprenorphine; Codeine; Female; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; HIV Seroprevalence; Humans; Incidence; Male; Methadone; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Self Medication; Sex Work; Sexual Behavior; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

People living with HIV and opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionally affected by adverse socio-structural exposures negatively affecting health, which have shown inconsistent associations with uptake of medications for OUD (MOUD). This study aimed to determine whether social determinants of health (SDOH) were associated with MOUD uptake and trajectories of substance use in a clinical trial of people seeking treatment.. Data are from a 2018 to 2019 randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of different MOUD to achieve viral suppression among people living with HIV and OUD. SDOH were defined by variables mapping to Healthy People 2030 domains: education (Education Access and Quality), income (Economic Stability), homelessness (Neighborhood and Built Environment), criminal justice involvement (Social and Community Context), and recent SUD care (Health Care Access and Quality). Associations between SDOH and MOUD initiation were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models, and SDOH and substance use over time with generalized estimating equation models.. Participants (N = 114) averaged 47 years old, 63% were male, 56% were Black, and 12% Hispanic. Participants reported an average of 2.3 out of 5 positive SDOH indicators (SD = 1.2). Stable housing was the most commonly reported SDOH (61%), followed by no recent criminal justice involvement (59%), having a high-school level education or greater (56%), income stability (45%), and recent SUD care (13%). Each additional favorable SDOH was associated with a 25% increase in the likelihood of MOUD initiation during the study period [adjusted HR = 1.25, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.55),. Positive social determinants of health, in aggregate, may increase the likelihood of MOUD treatment initiation among people living with HIV and OUD.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Social Determinants of Health

In Vietnam, access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) for people living with HIV has rapidly expanded, but MOUD use over time remains low. We sought to assess factors associated with days of MOUD treatment exposure.. From 2015 to 2019, patients with OUD in six Northern Vietnamese HIV clinics were randomized to receive HIV clinic-based buprenorphine (BUP/NX) or referral for methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and followed for 12 months. All MOUD doses were directly observed and abstracted from dosing logs. The primary outcome was days of MOUD treatment exposure (buprenorphine or methadone) received over 12 months. Negative binomial regression modelled associations with days of MOUD exposure.. Of 281 participants, 264 (94%) were eligible for analysis. Participants were primarily male (97%), unmarried (61%), employed (54%), and previously arrested (83%). Participants had a mean 187 (SD 150) days of MOUD exposure with 134 (51%) having at least 180 days, and 35 (13.2%) having at least 360 days of MOUD exposure. Age (IRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.55), income (IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.001), and methadone (IRR 1.88, 95% CI 1.51-2.42) were associated with MOUD exposure in multivariate models. Multivariate models predicted 127 (95% CL 109-147) days of MOUD exposure for HIV clinic based-buprenorphine vs 243 (95% CL 205-288) for MMT.. MOUD treatment exposure was suboptimal among patients with HIV and OUD in Northern Vietnam and was influenced by several factors. Interventions to support populations at risk of lower MOUD exposure as well programs administering MOUD should be considered in countries seeking to expand access to MOUD.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Vietnam

Despite dramatic increases in opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose deaths, the U.S. has been unable to consistently deliver OUD treatment to those who need it. Syringe services programs (SSPs) can engage an out-of-treatment population of people with OUD that has elevated overdose risk. Buprenorphine treatment is safe and effective, and US regulations allow for prescribing from diverse locations, including SSPs. This study's objective is to test buprenorphine treatment initiation at SSPs. We hypothesize that offering onsite buprenorphine treatment initiation will improve OUD treatment engagement without reducing buprenorphine treatment effectiveness or safety.. We will recruit 250 out-of-treatment SSP participants with OUD in a large urban area. Participants will be randomized to onsite buprenorphine treatment initiation or enhanced referral. Over 2 weeks, participants in the onsite treatment arm will see a buprenorphine provider twice at the SSP, receive weekly medication packs, and then their care will be transferred to a community health center for treatment continuation. In the control arm, within one week, participants will receive an appointment at the same community health center as in the intervention arm for buprenorphine initiation and continuation. Participants will be assessed with urine drug tests, questionnaires, and medical record review. The primary outcome will be engagement in buprenorphine treatment at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include buprenorphine diversion, opioid-free urine drug tests, and intervention cost-effectiveness.. Our study will contribute to the growing literature on SSPs as a conduit to OUD treatment. SSPs hold promise to deliver needed care to people with OUD.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Harm Reduction; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders

Opioid use disorder (OUD) and injection drug use (IDU) place justice-involved individuals at increased risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methadone and buprenorphine have been associated with reduced opioid IDU; however, the effect of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on this behavior is incompletely studied.. This study examined injection opioid use and shared injection equipment behavior from a completed double-blind placebo-controlled trial of XR-NTX among 88 justice-involved participants with HIV and OUD. Changes in participants' self-reported daily injection opioid use and shared injection equipment was evaluated pre-incarceration, during incarceration, and monthly post-release for 6 months. The study also assessed differences in time to first opioid injection post-release. The research team performed intention to treat and "as treated" (high treatment versus low treatment) analyses.. Fifty-eight of 88 participants (69.5 %) endorsed IDU and 26 (29.5 %) reported sharing injection equipment in the 30 days pre-incarceration; 2 participants (2.2 %) reported IDU during incarceration; 19 (21.6 %) reported IDU one month post-release from prison or jail. Fifty-four (61.4 %) participants had an HIV RNA below 200 copies/mL and 62 (70.5 %) were baseline HCV antibody positive. The 6-month follow-up rate was 49.5 % and 50.5 % for those who received XR-NTX and placebo, respectively, which was not significantly different (p = 0.822). Participants in the XR-NTX and placebo groups had similar low mean opioid injection use post-release and time to first injection opioid use in the Intention-to-treat analysis. In the as-treated analysis, participants in the high treatment group had significantly lower mean proportion of days injecting opioids (13.8 % high treatment versus 22.8 % low treatment, p = 0.02) by month 1, which persisted up to 5 months post-release (0 % high treatment vs 24.3 % low treatment, p < 0.001) and experienced a longer time to first opioid injection post-release (143.8 days high treatment vs 67.4 days low treatment, p < 0.001).. Injection opioid use was low during incarceration and remained low post-release in this justice-involved population. Retention on XR-NTX was associated with reduced intravenous opioid use, which has important implications for reducing transmission of HIV and HCV.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Methadone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; RNA; Social Justice

Associations between fentanyl use and initiation and retention on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are poorly understood.. Data were from a multisite clinical trial comparing extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) with treatment as usual (TAU; buprenorphine or methadone) to achieve HIV viral suppression among people with OUD and uncontrolled HIV disease. The exposure of interest was fentanyl use, as measured by urine drug screening. Outcomes were time to MOUD initiation, defined as date of first injection of XR-NTX, buprenorphine prescription, or methadone administration; MOUD persistence, the total number of injections, prescriptions, or administrations received over 24 weeks; and MOUD retention, having an injection, prescription, or administration during weeks 20-24.. Participants (N = 111) averaged 47 years old and 62% were male. Just over half (57%) were Black and 13% were Hispanic. Sixty-four percent of participants tested positive for fentanyl at baseline. Participants with baseline fentanyl positivity were 11 times less likely to initiate XR-NTX than those negative for fentanyl (aHR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.24, p < .001), but there was no evidence that fentanyl use impacted the likelihood of TAU initiation (aHR = 1.50, 0.67-3.36, p = .323). Baseline fentanyl use was not associated with persistence or retention on any MOUD.. Fentanyl use was a substantial barrier to XR-NTX initiation for the treatment of OUD in persons with uncontrolled HIV infection. There was no evidence that fentanyl use impacted partial/full agonist initiation and, once initiated, retention on any MOUD.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Fentanyl; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders

UNAIDS recommends integrating methadone or buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder with HIV care to improve HIV outcomes, but buprenorphine adoption remains limited in many countries. We aimed to assess whether HIV clinic-based buprenorphine plus naloxone treatment for opioid use disorder was non-inferior to referral for methadone maintenance therapy in achieving HIV viral suppression in Vietnam.. In an open-label, non-inferiority trial (BRAVO), we randomly assigned people with HIV and opioid use disorder (1:1) by computer-generated random number sequence, in blocks of ten and stratified by site, to receive HIV clinic-based buprenorphine plus naloxone treatment or referral for methadone maintenance therapy in six HIV clinics in Vietnam. The primary outcome was HIV viral suppression at 12 months (HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies per mL on PCR) by intention to treat (absolute risk difference [RD] margin ≤13%), compared by use of generalised estimating equations. Research staff actively queried treatment-emergent adverse events during quarterly study visits and passively collected adverse events reported during HIV clinic visits. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01936857, and is completed.. Between July 27, 2015, and Feb 12, 2018, we enrolled 281 patients. At baseline, 272 (97%) participants were male, mean age was 38·3 years (SD 6·1), and mean CD4 count was 405 cells per μL (SD 224). Viral suppression improved between baseline and 12 months for both HIV clinic-based buprenorphine plus naloxone (from 97 [69%] of 140 patients to 74 [81%] of 91 patients) and referral for methadone maintenance therapy (from 92 [66%] of 140 to 99 [93%] of 107). Buprenorphine plus naloxone did not demonstrate non-inferiority to methadone maintenance therapy in achieving viral suppression at 12 months (RD -0·11, 95% CI -0·20 to -0·02). Retention on medication at 12 months was lower for buprenorphine plus naloxone than for methadone maintenance therapy (40% vs 65%; RD -0·53, 95% CI -0·75 to -0·31). Participants assigned to buprenorphine plus naloxone more frequently experienced serious adverse events (ten [7%] of 141 vs four of 140 [3%] assigned to methadone maintenance therapy) and deaths (seven of 141 [5%] vs three of 141 [2%]). Serious adverse events and deaths typically occurred in people no longer taking ART or opioid use disorder medications.. Although integrated buprenorphine and HIV care may potentially increase access to treatment for opioid use disorder, scale-up in middle-income countries might require enhanced support for buprenorphine adherence to improve HIV viral suppression. The strength of our study as a multisite randomised trial was offset by low retention of patients on buprenorphine.. National Institute on Drug Abuse (US National Institutes of Health).

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance; Random Allocation; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Vietnam; Viral Load

Understanding the role of opiate dependency treatment in risky sexual behavior could help optimize interventions for people who inject drugs (PWID).. We evaluated whether long-term medication-assisted treatment (LT-MAT) of opiate dependency with buprenorphine/naloxone influenced risky sexual behavior among HIV-uninfected PWID and identified predictors of risky sexual behavior.. We used data from HPTN 058, a randomized controlled trial of LT-MAT vs. short-term medication-assisted treatment among PWID in China and Thailand. We evaluated associations between randomized opiate dependency treatment group and self-reported risky sexual behaviors within the past month: condomless sex with primary partner, condomless sex with nonprimary partner, multiple partners, and more than 3 sexual acts. We used generalized estimating equations to conduct intention-to-treat, as-treated, and exploratory analyses of these associations.. Of 1250 participants included in the analysis, 92% were male, with median age of 34 years (interquartile range 28-39). At baseline, referring to the past month, 36% of participants reported condomless sex with primary partner, 4% reported condomless sex with nonprimary partner, 6% reported multiple sex partners, and 30% reported more than 3 sexual acts. Risky sexual behaviors did not differ significantly between treatment groups at any point. Significant predictors (P < 0.05) of condomless sex with nonprimary partner were history of incarceration and noninjection drug use. Number of needle-sharing partners, noninjection drug use, and higher income were predictors for multiple sexual partners.. LT-MAT did not significantly modify risky sexual behavior among HIV-uninfected PWID. Interventions that reduce sexual risk should target PWID with history of incarceration, alcohol use, and needle sharing.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; China; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Naloxone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking; Sexual Behavior; Thailand; Young Adult

There is a critical need to reduce infectious disease transmission among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Here we examine the ability of a novel, automated educational intervention, delivered via iPad in a single visit, to improve human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) knowledge among adults with OUD.. Participants were 25 adults enrolled in a 12-week trial evaluating the efficacy of an Interim Buprenorphine Treatment for reducing illicit opioid use and other risk behaviors during delays to opioid treatment. Participants completed baseline HIV and HCV knowledge assessments with corrective feedback. They then completed an interactive HIV flipbook and HCV video followed by a second administration of the knowledge assessments. The knowledge assessments were repeated at post-intake Weeks 4 and 12.. At baseline, participants answered 69% and 65% of items correctly on the HIV and HCV assessments, respectively. The educational intervention was associated with significant increases in knowledge (86% and 86% correct on the HIV and HCV assessments, respectively; p's<.001). These improvements persisted throughout the study, with scores at Week 4 and 12 significantly greater than baseline (p's<.001).. This HIV+Hepatitis Education intervention was associated with significant and sustained improvements in knowledge of HIV + HCV transmission and risk behaviors in this vulnerable group of individuals with OUD. Given the continuing opioid epidemic, efforts are urgently needed to reduce HIV and HCV contraction and transmission among individuals with OUD. Mobile health educational interventions may offer a time- and cost-effective approach for addressing these risks.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Education as Topic; Pilot Projects; Risk-Taking; Telemedicine

Injection opioid use plays a significant role in the transmission of HIV infection in many communities and several regions of the world. Access to evidence-based treatments for opioid use disorders is extremely limited.. HIV Prevention Trials Network 058 (HPTN 058) was a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the impact of 2 medication-assisted treatment (MAT) strategies on HIV incidence or death among opioid-dependent people who inject drugs (PWID). HIV-negative opioid-dependent PWID were recruited from 4 communities in Thailand and China with historically high prevalence of HIV among PWID. A total of 1251 participants were randomly assigned to either (1) a 1-year intervention consisting of 2 opportunities for a 15-day detoxification with buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) combined with up to 21 sessions of behavioral drug and risk counseling [short-term medication-assisted treatment (ST-MAT)] or (2) thrice-weekly dosing for 48 weeks with BUP/NX and up to 21 counseling sessions [long-term medication-assisted treatment (LT-MAT)] followed by dose tapering. All participants were followed for 52 weeks after treatment completion to assess durability of impact.. Although the study was stopped early due to lower than expected occurrence of the primary end points, sufficient data were available to assess the impact of the interventions on drug use and injection-related risk behavior. At week 26, 22% of ST-MAT participants had negative urinalyses for opioids compared with 57% in the LT-MAT (P < 0.001). Differences disappeared in the year after treatment: at week 78, 35% in ST-MAT and 32% in the LT-MAT had negative urinalyses. Injection-related risk behaviors were significantly reduced in both groups after randomization.. Participants receiving BUP/NX 3 times weekly were more likely to reduce opioid injection while on active treatment. Both treatment strategies were considered safe and associated with reductions in injection-related risk behavior. These data support the use of thrice-weekly BUP/NX as a way to reduce exposure to HIV risk. Continued access to BUP/NX may be required to sustain reductions in opioid use.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; China; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Male; Naloxone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Opioid-dependent patients often use the emergency department (ED) for medical care.. To test the efficacy of 3 interventions for opioid dependence: (1) screening and referral to treatment (referral); (2) screening, brief intervention, and facilitated referral to community-based treatment services (brief intervention); and (3) screening, brief intervention, ED-initiated treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone, and referral to primary care for 10-week follow-up (buprenorphine).. A randomized clinical trial involving 329 opioid-dependent patients who were treated at an urban teaching hospital ED from April 7, 2009, through June 25, 2013.. After screening, 104 patients were randomized to the referral group, 111 to the brief intervention group, and 114 to the buprenorphine treatment group.. Enrollment in and receiving addiction treatment 30 days after randomization was the primary outcome. Self-reported days of illicit opioid use, urine testing for illicit opioids, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, and use of addiction treatment services were the secondary outcomes.. Seventy-eight percent of patients in the buprenorphine group (89 of 114 [95% CI, 70%-85%]) vs 37% in the referral group (38 of 102 [95% CI, 28%-47%]) and 45% in the brief intervention group (50 of 111 [95% CI, 36%-54%]) were engaged in addiction treatment on the 30th day after randomization (P < .001). The buprenorphine group reduced the number of days of illicit opioid use per week from 5.4 days (95% CI, 5.1-5.7) to 0.9 days (95% CI, 0.5-1.3) vs a reduction from 5.4 days (95% CI, 5.1-5.7) to 2.3 days (95% CI, 1.7-3.0) in the referral group and from 5.6 days (95% CI, 5.3-5.9) to 2.4 days (95% CI, 1.8-3.0) in the brief intervention group (P < .001 for both time and intervention effects; P = .02 for the interaction effect). The rates of urine samples that tested negative for opioids did not differ statistically across groups, with 53.8% (95% CI, 42%-65%) in the referral group, 42.9% (95% CI, 31%-55%) in the brief intervention group, and 57.6% (95% CI, 47%-68%) in the buprenorphine group (P = .17). There were no statistically significant differences in HIV risk across groups (P = .66). Eleven percent of patients in the buprenorphine group (95% CI, 6%-19%) used inpatient addiction treatment services, whereas 37% in the referral group (95% CI, 27%-48%) and 35% in the brief intervention group (95% CI, 25%-37%) used inpatient addiction treatment services (P < .001).. Among opioid-dependent patients, ED-initiated buprenorphine treatment vs brief intervention and referral significantly increased engagement in addiction treatment, reduced self-reported illicit opioid use, and decreased use of inpatient addiction treatment services but did not significantly decrease the rates of urine samples that tested positive for opioids or of HIV risk. These findings require replication in other centers before widespread adoption.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00913770.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Health Services; HIV Infections; Hospitals, Teaching; Hospitals, Urban; Humans; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Referral and Consultation; Risk; Young Adult

Compare HIV injecting and sex risk in patients being treated with methadone (MET) or buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP).. Secondary analysis from a study of liver enzyme changes in patients randomized to MET or BUP who completed 24 weeks of treatment and had 4 or more blood draws. The initial 1:1 randomization was changed to 2:1 (BUP:MET) after 18 months due to higher dropout in BUP. The Risk Behavior Survey measured HIV risk before 30 days at baseline and weeks 12 and 24.. Among 529 patients randomized to MET, 391 (74%) were completers; among 740 randomized to BUP, 340 (46%) were completers; 700 completed the Risk Behavior Survey. There were significant reductions in injecting risk (P < 0.0008) with no differences between groups in mean number of times reported injecting heroin, speedball, other opiates, and number of injections; or percent who shared needles; did not clean shared needles with bleach; shared cookers; or engaged in front/back loading of syringes. The percent having multiple sex partners decreased equally in both groups (P < 0.03). For males on BUP, the sex risk composite increased; for males on MET, the sex risk decreased resulting in significant group differences over time (P < 0.03). For females, there was a significant reduction in sex risk (P < 0.02) with no group differences.. Among MET and BUP patients who remained in treatment, HIV injecting risk was equally and markedly reduced; however, MET retained more patients. Sex risk was equally and significantly reduced among females in both treatment conditions, but it increased for males on BUP and decreased for males on MET.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Reduction Behavior; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Unsafe Sex

Determine the extent to which buprenorphine injectors continue treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone or methadone, and the impact of these treatments on substance use and HIV risk in the Republic of Georgia.. Randomized controlled 12-week trial of daily-observed methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone followed by a dose taper, referral to ongoing treatment, and follow-up at week 20 at the Uranti Clinic in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia. Eighty consenting treatment-seeking individuals (40/group) aged 25 and above who met ICD-10 criteria for opioid dependence with physiologic features and reported injecting buprenorphine 10 or more times in the past 30 days. Opioid use according to urine tests and self-reports, treatment retention, and HIV risk behavior as determined by the Risk Assessment Battery.. Mean age of participants was 33.7 (SD5.7), 4 were female, mean history of opioid injection use was 5.8 years (SD4.6), none were HIV+ at intake or at the 12-week assessment and 73.4% were HCV+. Sixty-eight participants (85%) completed the 12-week medication phase (33 from methadone and 35 from buprenorphine/naloxone group); 37 (46%) were in treatment at the 20-week follow-up (21 from methadone and 16 from the buprenorphine/naloxone group). In both study arms, treatment resulted in a marked reduction in unprescribed buprenorphine, other opioid use, and HIV injecting risk behavior with no clinically significant differences between the two treatment arms.. Daily observed methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone are effective treatments for non-medical buprenorphine and other opioid use in the Republic of Georgia and likely to be useful for preventing HIV infection.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; Georgia (Republic); Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Narcotics; Needle Sharing; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking; Substance Abuse Detection; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome

This study examined associations between substance use behaviors and self-reported health among hospitalized heroin users. Of the 112 participants, 53 (47%) reported good or better health. In multivariable logistic regression models, each day of heroin use in the last month was associated with an 8% lower odds of reporting health as good or better (OR=.92; 95% CI 0.87, 0.97, p<.05). Cocaine, cannabis, cigarettes, alcohol use, unintentional overdose, nor injection drug use was associated with health status.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Diagnostic Self Evaluation; Female; Health Status; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Self Report; Urban Health

The high rates of HIV and Hepatitis C (HCV) infection among opioid abusers is a serious public health problem, and efforts to enhance knowledge regarding risks for HIV/hepatitis infection in this population are important. Abuse of prescription opioids (POs), in particular, has increased substantially in the past decade and is associated with increasing rates of injection drug use and HCV infection.. This study describes the effects of a brief HIV/HCV educational intervention delivered in the context of a larger randomized, double-blind clinical trial evaluating the relative efficacy of 1-, 2-, and 4-week outpatient buprenorphine tapers and subsequent oral naltrexone maintenance for treating PO dependence. HIV- and HCV-related knowledge and risk behaviors were characterized pre- and post-intervention in 54 primary PO abusers.. The educational intervention was associated with significant improvements in HIV (p<.001) and HCV (p<.001) knowledge. Significant improvements (p<.001) were observed on all three domains of the HIV questionnaire (i.e., general knowledge, sexual risk behaviors, drug risk behaviors) and on 21 and 11 individual items on the HIV and HCV questionnaires, respectively. Self-reported likelihood of using a condom also increased significantly (p<.05) from pre- to post-intervention. No additional changes in self-reported risk behaviors were observed.. These results suggest that a brief, easy-to-administer intervention is associated with substantial gains in HIV and HCV knowledge among PO abusers and represents the necessary first step toward the dissemination of a structured prevention HIV and HCV intervention for PO abusers.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Buprenorphine; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Health Education; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prescription Drug Misuse; Risk Assessment; Risk-Taking; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Surveys and Questionnaires; Unsafe Sex; Young Adult

Buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) is not licenced for use in China or Thailand and there was little clinical experience with this drug combination in these countries at the inception of HIV Prevention Trial Network (HPTN) 058, a randomized trial comparing risk reduction counselling combined with either short-term or long-term medication assisted treatment with BUP/NX to prevent HIV infection and death amongst opioid-dependent injectors.. We conducted a safety phase that included the first 50 subjects enrolled at each of the three initial study sites (N=150). Clinical and laboratory assessments were conducted at baseline and weekly for the first 4 weeks. Changes in laboratory parameters were estimated with random effects models.. BUP/NX was well tolerated by study subjects and opioid withdrawal scores decreased substantially during the 3-day induction. Two participants experienced grade 3 clinical adverse events, which were categorized as probably not related to the study drug. Grade 2 or 3 increases in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) occurred in 25 (17%) subjects. The magnitude of ALT increase over 4-week follow-up was strongly associated with baseline ALT elevation.. In Chinese and Thai opioid-dependent injectors, we found BUP/NX to be effective in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms and safe during short-term use. ALT increases were observed over 4-week-follow-up, which are consistent with reports from Western populations. Long-term safety and efficacy evaluations are indicated.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; China; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Models, Statistical; Naloxone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Thailand; Time Factors

Untreated opioid dependence adversely affects HIV outcomes. Integrating buprenorphine/naloxone into HIV treatment settings is feasible; however, the optimal level of counseling has not been established. We conducted a 12-week randomized clinical trial of physician management (PM) versus PM plus enhanced medical management (EMM) in 47 subjects. At 12 weeks, there were no differences between the two groups in percentage of opioid negative urines (63.6% PM vs. 69.0% PM+EMM, p=.5), maximum duration of continuous abstinence (4.9 weeks PM vs. 5.2 weeks PM+EMM, p=.8) or retention (80% PM vs. 59% PM+EMM, p=.1). The percentage of subjects with detectable HIV viral loads decreased from 58% at baseline to 40% at 12 weeks across both groups (p=.02 for time) with no between group differences (p=.84 and p=.27 for the interaction). Providing more extensive counseling beyond PM is feasible in an HIV clinic, but we are unable to detect an improvement in outcomes associated with these services.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Counseling; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Psychotherapy, Brief; Substance Abuse Detection; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Having opioid dependence and HIV infection are associated with poor HIV-related treatment outcomes.. HIV-infected, opioid-dependent subjects (N = 295) recruited from 10 clinical sites initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) and were assessed at baseline and quarterly for 12 months. Primary outcomes included receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-1 RNA suppression, and mean changes in CD4 lymphocyte count. Analyses were stratified for the 119 subjects not on ART at baseline. Generalized estimating equations were deployed to examine time-dependent correlates for each outcome.. At baseline, subjects on ART (N = 176) were more likely than those not on ART (N = 119) to be older, heterosexual, have lower alcohol addiction severity scores, and lower HIV-1 RNA levels; they were less likely to be homeless and report sexual risk behaviors. Subjects initiating BUP/NX (N = 295) were significantly more likely to initiate or remain on ART and improve CD4 counts over time compared with baseline; however, these improvements were not significantly improved by longer retention on BUP/NX. Retention on BUP/NX for three or more quarters was, however, significantly associated with increased likelihood of initiating ART (β = 1.34 [1.18, 1.53]) and achieve viral suppression (β = 1.25 [1.10, 1.42]) for the 64 of 119 (54%) subjects not on ART at baseline compared with the 55 subjects not retained on BUP/NX. In longitudinal analyses, being on ART was positively associated with increasing time of observation from baseline and higher mental health quality of life scores (β = 1.25 [1.06, 1.46]) and negatively associated with being homo- or bisexual (β = 0.55 [0.35, 0.97]), homeless (β = 0.58 [0.34, 0.98]), and increasing levels of alcohol addiction severity (β = 0.17 [0.03, 0.88]). The strongest correlate of achieving viral suppression was being on ART (β = 10.27 [5.79, 18.23]). Female gender (β = 1.91 [1.07, 3.41]), Hispanic ethnicity (β = 2.82 [1.44, 5.49]), and increased general health quality of life (β = 1.02 [1.00,1.04]) were also independently correlated with viral suppression. Improvements in CD4 lymphocyte count were significantly associated with being on ART and increased over time.. Initiating BUP/NX in HIV clinical care settings is feasible and correlated with initiation of ART and improved CD4 lymphocyte counts. Longer retention on BPN/NX was not associated with improved prescription of ART, viral suppression, or CD4 lymphocyte counts for the overall sample in which the majority was already prescribed ART at baseline. Among those retained on BUP/NX, HIV treatment outcomes did not worsen and were sustained. Increasing time on BUP/NX, however, was especially important for improving HIV treatment outcomes for those not on ART at baseline, the group at highest risk for clinical deterioration. Retaining subjects on BUP/NX is an important goal for sustaining HIV treatment outcomes for those on ART and improving them for those who are not. Comorbid substance use disorders (especially alcohol), mental health problems, and quality-of-life indicators independently contributed to HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected persons with opioid dependence, suggesting the need for multidisciplinary treatment strategies for this population.

Topics: Alcoholism; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Factors; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

Buprenorphine/naloxone allows the integration of opioid dependence and HIV treatment.. We conducted a prospective study in HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients to investigate the impact of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment on drug use. Self-report and chart review assessments were conducted every 3 months (quarters 1-4) for 1 year. Outcomes were buprenorphine/naloxone treatment retention, drug use, and addiction treatment processes.. Among 303 patients enrolled between July 2005 and December 2007, retention in buprenorphine/naloxone treatment was 74%, 67%, 59%, and 49% during Quarters 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Past 30-day illicit opioid use decreased from 84% of patients at baseline to 42% in retained patients over the year. Patients were 52% less likely to use illicit opioids for each quarter in treatment (Odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.72). Buprenorphine/naloxone doses and office visits approximated guidelines published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Urine toxicology monitoring was less frequent than recommended.. Buprenorphine/naloxone provided in HIV treatment settings can decrease opioid use. Strategies are needed to improve retention and address ongoing drug use in this treatment population.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Odds Ratio; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Substance abuse is associated with poor medical and quality-of-life outcomes among HIV-infected individuals. Although drug treatment may reduce these negative consequences, for many patients, options are limited. Buprenorphine/naloxone, an opioid agonist treatment that can be prescribed in the United States in office-based settings, can be used to expand treatment capacity and integrate substance abuse services into HIV care. Recognizing this potential, the US Health Resources and Services Administration funded the development and implementation of demonstration projects that integrated HIV care and buprenorphine/naloxone treatment at 10 sites across the country. An Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center provided programmatic and clinical support as well as oversight for an evaluation that examined the processes for and outcomes of integrated care. The evaluation included patient-level self-report and chart abstractions as well as provider and site level data collected through surveys and in-depth interviews. Although multisite demonstrations pose implementation and evaluation challenges, our experience demonstrates that these can, in part, be addressed through ongoing communication and technical assistance as well as a comprehensive evaluation design that incorporates multiple research methods and data sources. Although limitations to evaluation findings persist, they may be balanced by the scope and "real-world" context of the initiative.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pilot Projects; United States

HIV-infected prisoners fare poorly after release. Though rarely available, opioid agonist therapy (OAT) may be one way to improve HIV and substance abuse treatment outcomes after release. Of the 69 HIV-infected prisoners enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of directly administered antiretroviral therapy, 48 (70%) met DSM-IV criteria for opioid dependence. Of these, 30 (62.5%) selected OAT, either as methadone (N = 7, 14.5%) or buprenorphine/naloxone (BPN/NLX; N = 23, 48.0%). Twelve-week HIV and substance abuse treatment outcomes are reported as a sub-study for those selecting BPN/NLX. Retention was high: 21 (91%) completed BPN/NLX induction and 17 (74%) remained on BPN/NLX after 12 weeks. Compared with baseline, the proportion with a non-detectable viral load (61% vs 63% log(10) copies/mL) and mean CD4 count (367 vs 344 cells/mL) was unchanged at 12 weeks. Opiate-negative urine testing remained 83% for the 21 who completed induction. Using means from 10-point Likert scales, opioid craving was reduced from 6.0 to 1.8 within 3 days of BPN/NLX induction and satisfaction remained high at 9.5 throughout the 12 weeks. Adverse events were few and mild. BPN/NLX therapy was acceptable, safe and effective for both HIV and opioid treatment outcomes among released HIV-infected prisoners. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to affirm its benefit in this highly vulnerable population.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Prisoners; Substance-Related Disorders

To assess baseline rates of and changes in HIV drug and sexual risk behavior as a function of gender and treatment in opioid-dependent youth.. One hundred fifty participants were randomly assigned to extended buprenorphine/naloxone therapy (BUP) for 12 weeks or detoxification for 2 weeks; all received drug counseling for 12 weeks. HIV risk was assessed at baseline and 4-week, 8-week, and 12-week follow-ups. Behavioral change was examined using generalized estimating equations.. Baseline rates of past-month HIV risk for females/males were 51%/45% for injection drug use (IDU) (ns), 77%/35% for injection risk (P < 0.001), 82%/74% for sexual activity (ns), 14%/24% for multiple partners (ns), and 68%/65% for unprotected intercourse (ns). IDU decreased over time (P < 0.001), with greater decreases in BUP versus detoxification (P < 0.001) and females versus males in BUP (P < 0.05). Injection risk did not change for persistent injectors. Sexual activity decreased in both genders and conditions (P < 0.01), but sexual risk did not.. Overall, IDU and sexual activity decreased markedly, particularly in BUP patients and females, but injection and sexual risk behaviors persisted. Although extended BUP seems to have favorable effects on HIV risk behavior in opioid-dependent youth, risk reduction counseling may be necessary to extend its benefits.

Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Risk Assessment; Risk-Taking; Sexual Behavior; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance-Related Disorders; Young Adult

Opioid dependence is common in HIV clinics. Buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP) is an effective treatment of opioid dependence that may be used in routine medical settings.. To compare clinic-based treatment with BUP (clinic-based BUP) with case management and referral to an opioid treatment program (referred treatment).. Single-center, 12-month randomized trial. Participants and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00130819). HIV clinic in Baltimore, Maryland.. 93 HIV-infected, opioid-dependent participants who were not receiving opioid agonist therapy and were not dependent on alcohol or benzodiazepines.. Clinic-based BUP included BUP induction and dose titration, urine drug testing, and individual counseling. Referred treatment included case management and referral to an opioid-treatment program.. Initiation and long-term receipt of opioid agonist therapy, urine drug test results, visit attendance with primary HIV care providers, use of antiretroviral therapy, and changes in HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts.. The average estimated participation in opioid agonist therapy was 74% (95% CI, 61% to 84%) for clinic-based BUP and 41% (CI, 29% to 53%) for referred treatment (P < 0.001). Positive test results for opioids and cocaine were significantly less frequent in clinic-based BUP than in referred treatment, and study participants receiving clinic-based BUP attended significantly more HIV primary care visits than those receiving referred treatment. Use of antiretroviral therapy and changes in HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts did not differ between the 2 groups.. This was a small single-center study, follow-up was only moderate, and the study groups were unbalanced in terms of recent drug injections at baseline.. Management of HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients with a clinic-based BUP strategy facilitates access to opioid agonist therapy and improves outcomes of substance abuse treatment.. Health Resources and Services Administration Special Projects of National Significance program.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Baltimore; Buprenorphine; Community Health Services; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Referral and Consultation; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Treatment Outcome

Buprenorphine has rarely been administered as an opioid agonist maintenance therapy in a correctional setting. This study introduced buprenorphine maintenance in a large urban jail, Rikers Island in New York City. Heroin-dependent men not enrolled in community methadone treatment and sentenced to 10-90 days in jail (N=116) were voluntarily randomly assigned either to buprenorphine or methadone maintenance, the latter being the standard of care for eligible inmates at Rikers. Buprenorphine and methadone maintenance completion rates in jail were equally high, but the buprenorphine group reported for their designated post-release treatment in the community significantly more often than did the methadone group (48% vs. 14%, p<.001). Consistent with this result, prior to release from Rikers, buprenorphine patients stated an intention to continue treatment after release more often than did methadone patients (93% vs. 44%, p<.001). Buprenorphine patients were also less likely than methadone patients to withdraw voluntarily from medication while in jail (3% vs. 16%, p<.05). There were no post-release differences between the buprenorphine and methadone groups in self-reported relapse to illicit opioid use, self-reported re-arrests, self-reported severity of crime or re-incarceration in jail. After initiating opioid agonist treatment in jail, continuing buprenorphine maintenance in the community appears to be more acceptable to offenders than continuing methadone maintenance.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Buprenorphine; Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry); Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Methadone; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Selection; Prisons; Recurrence; Socioeconomic Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence often require opioid replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic interactions between HIV therapy and opioid dependence treatment medications can occur. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) therapy sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of open-label, twice daily tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r). Twelve subjects were enrolled and 10 completed the study. Prior to starting TPV/r, the geometric mean BUP AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 43.9 ng h/mL and 5.61 ng/mL, respectively. After achieving steady-state with TPV/r (> or = 7 days), these values were similar at 43.7 ng h/mL and 4.84 ng/mL, respectively. Similar analyses for norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated a reduction in geometric mean for AUC(0-24h) [68.7-14.7 ng h/mL; ratio=0.21 (90% CI 0.19-0.25)] and C(max) [4.75-0.94 ng/mL; ratio=0.20 (90% CI 0.17-0.23)]. The last measurable NLX concentration (C(last)) in the concentration-time profile, never measured in previous BUP/NLX interaction studies with antiretroviral medications, was decreased by 20%. Despite these pharmacokinetic effects on BUP metabolites and NLX, no clinical opioid withdrawal symptoms were noted. TPV steady-state AUC(0-12h) and C(max) decreased 19% and 25%, respectively, and C(min) was relatively unchanged when compared to historical control subjects receiving TPV/r alone. No dosage modification of BUP/NLX is required when co-administered with TPV/r. Though mechanistically unclear, it is likely that decreased plasma RTV levels while on BUP/NLX contributed substantially to the decrease in TPV levels. BUP/NLX and TPV/r should therefore be used cautiously to avoid decreased efficacy of TPV in patients taking these agents concomitantly.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Expansion of access to effective treatments for heroin dependence is a worldwide health priority that will also reduce HIV transmission. We compared the efficacy of naltrexone, buprenorphine, and no additional treatment, in patients receiving detoxification and subsequent drug counselling, for maintenance of heroin abstinence, prevention of relapse, and reduction of HIV risk behaviours.. 126 detoxified heroin-dependent patients, from an outpatient research clinic and detoxification programme in Malaysia, were randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation sequence to 24 weeks of manual-guided drug counselling and maintenance with naltrexone (n=43), buprenorphine (n=44), or placebo (n=39). Medications were administered on a double-blind and double-dummy basis. Primary outcomes, assessed by urine testing three times per week, were days to first heroin use, days to heroin relapse (three consecutive opioid-positive urine tests), maximum consecutive days of heroin abstinence, and reductions in HIV risk behaviours over 6 months. The study was terminated after 22 months of enrolment because buprenorphine was shown to have greater efficacy in an interim safety analysis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00383045.. We observed consistent, linear contrasts in days to first heroin use (p=0.0009), days to heroin relapse (p=0.009), and maximum consecutive days abstinent (p=0.0007), with all results best for buprenorphine and worst for placebo. Buprenorphine was associated with greater time to first heroin use than were naltrexone (hazard ratio 1.87 [95% CI 1.21-2.88]) or placebo (2.02 [1.29-3.16]). With buprenorphine, we also recorded significantly greater time to heroin relapse (2.17 [1.38-3.42]), and maximum consecutive days abstinent than with placebo (mean days 59 [95% CI 43-76] vs 24 [13-35]; p=0.003); however, for these outcomes, differences between buprenorphine and naltrexone were not significant. Differences between naltrexone and placebo were not significant for any outcomes. HIV risk behaviours were significantly reduced from baseline across all three treatments (p=0.003), but the reductions did not differ significantly between the three groups.. Our findings lend support to the widespread dissemination of maintenance treatment with buprenorphine as an effective public-health approach to reduce problems associated with heroin dependence.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Counseling; Double-Blind Method; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; Malaysia; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk-Taking; Treatment Outcome

Methadone treatment reduces human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, but the effects of primary-care-based buprenorphine/naloxone on HIV risk are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether primary-care-based buprenorphine/naloxone was associated with decreased HIV risk behavior. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 166 opioid-dependent persons (129 men and 37 women) receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment in a primary care clinic. We compared baseline and 12- and 24-week overall, drug-related, and sex-related HIV risk behaviors using the AIDS/HIV Risk Inventory (ARI). Buprenorphine/naloxone treatment was associated with significant reductions in overall and drug-related ARI scores from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks. Intravenous drug use in the past 3 months was endorsed by 37%, 12%, and 7% of patients at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively (p< .001). Sex while you or your partner were "high" was endorsed by 64%, 13%, and 15% of patients at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively (p< .001). Inconsistent condom use during sex with a steady partner was high at baseline and did not change over time. We conclude that primary-care-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment is associated with decreased drug-related HIV risk, but additional efforts may be needed to address sex-related HIV risk when present.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Risk-Taking; Sexual Behavior

This pilot randomized clinical trial evaluated whether the efficacy of office-based buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT), provided with limited counseling or oversight of medication adherence is improved by the addition of individual drug counseling and abstinence-contingent take-home doses of buprenorphine. After a 2-week buprenorphine and stabilization period, heroin dependent individuals (n=24) in Muar, Malaysia were randomly assigned to Standard Services BMT (physician administered advice and support, and weekly, non-contingent medication pick-up) or Enhanced Services (nurse-delivered manual-guided behavioral drug and HIV risk reduction counseling (BDRC) and abstinence-contingent take-home buprenorphine (ACB), 7 day supply maximum). Outcomes included retention, proportion of opioid-negative urine tests, self-reported drug use, and self-reported HIV risk behaviors. 12/12 (100%) of Enhanced Services and 11/12 (92%) of Standard Services participants completed the entire protocol. The proportion of opioid-negative urine tests increased significantly over time for both groups (p<0.001), and the reductions were significantly greater in the Enhanced Services group (p<0.05); Enhanced Services group achieved higher overall proportions of opiate negative urine toxicology tests (87% vs. 69%, p=0.04) and longer periods of consecutive abstinence from opiates (10.3 weeks vs. 7.8 weeks, p=0.154). Both groups significantly reduced HIV risk behaviors during treatment (p<0.05), but the difference between Enhanced and Standard Services (26% vs. 17% reductions from the baseline levels, respectively) was not statistically significant (p=0.9). Manual-guided behavioral drug and HIV risk reduction counseling and abstinence-contingent take-home buprenorphine appear promising for adding to the efficacy of office-based BMT provided with limited drug counseling and medication oversight.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Buprenorphine; Counseling; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Home Care Services; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pilot Projects; Risk Reduction Behavior

The efficacies of three opioid substitution medications for reducing HIV risk behaviors in opioid-dependent patients were assessed in a randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing levomethadyl acetate [corrected] (LAAM), buprenorphine (BUP), and methadone (METH). Individually optimized flexible dosing was used for each group, with weekly possible doses of 255-391 mg of LAAM, 56-112 mg of BUP, and 420-700 mg of METH. An interview regarding specific HIV risk behaviors, including injecting, equipment sharing, and sexual activity, yielded data for pretreatment and four in-study time points for 137 subjects. Declines in risk behaviors during treatment were evident in all groups for most measures of injecting and equipment sharing. Only the METH group showed consistent declines in measures of sexual behaviors. These results demonstrate that all three medications can be highly effective in decreasing HIV risk behaviors when the dose is optimized. Reductions in sexual behaviors for the METH group are consistent with known METH side effects.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Methadyl Acetate; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking

Untreated opioid dependence adversely affects the care of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, is available for maintenance treatment of opioid dependence in HIV specialty settings. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of integrating buprenorphine, along with 2 levels of counseling, into HIV clinical care.. HIV-positive, opioid-dependent patients were enrolled in a 12-week pilot study and randomized to receive daily buprenorphine/naloxone treatment along with either brief physician management or physician management combined with nurse-administered drug counseling and adherence management. Primary outcomes included treatment retention; illicit drug use, assessed by urine toxicology test and self-report; CD4 lymphocyte counts; and log(10) HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels.. Of the 16 patients who received at least 1 dose of buprenorphine, 13 (81%) completed 12 weeks of treatment. The proportion of opioid-positive weekly urine test results decreased from 100% at baseline to 32% (month 1), 20% (month 2), and 16% (month 3). Only 4 patients reported any opioid use (in the prior 7 days) during the 12-week study. CD4 lymphocyte counts remained stable over the course of the study. The mean log(10) HIV-1 RNA level (+/- standard deviation) declined significantly, from 3.66+/-1.06 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at baseline to 3.0+/-0.57 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at month 3 (P<.05). No significant differences based on counseling intervention were detected. All 13 patients who completed the study continued to receive treatment in an extension phase of at least 0-15 months' duration.. We conclude that it is feasible to integrate buprenorphine into HIV clinical care for the treatment of opioid dependence. Patients experienced good treatment retention and reductions in their opioid use. HIV biological markers remained stable or improved during buprenorphine/naloxone treatment.

Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pilot Projects; Probability; Reference Values; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

The prevalence of heroin and other opioid use has markedly increased among adolescents in the last decade; however, virtually no research has been conducted to identify effective treatments for this population.. To evaluate the relative efficacy of 2 pharmacotherapies, the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine hydrochloride and the centrally active alpha(2)-adrenergic blocker clonidine hydrochloride, in the detoxification of opioid-dependent adolescents.. A double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-groups randomized controlled trial conducted in a university-based research clinic from October 2001 to December 2003. Patients were a volunteer sample of 36 adolescents who met DSM-IV criteria for opioid dependence (ages 13-18 years eligible).. Participants were randomly assigned to a 28-day, outpatient, medication-assisted withdrawal treatment with either buprenorphine or clonidine. Both medications were provided along with thrice weekly behavioral counseling and incentives contingent on opiate abstinence. Postdetoxification, all participants were offered the opportunity for continued treatment with the opiate antagonist, naltrexone hydrochloride.. Treatment retention, opiate abstinence, and human immunodeficiency virus risk behavior, along with measures of withdrawal and medication effects.. A significantly greater percentage of adolescents who received buprenorphine were retained in treatment (72%) relative to those who received clonidine (39%) (P<.05). For those in the buprenorphine group, a significantly higher percentage of scheduled urine test results were opiate negative (64% vs 32%; P = .01). Participants in both groups reported relief of withdrawal symptoms and drug-related human immunodeficiency virus risk behavior. Those in the buprenorphine condition generally reported more positive effects of the medication. No evidence of opioid intoxication or psychomotor impairment was observed. Sixty-one percent of participants in the buprenorphine condition and 5% of those in the clonidine group initiated treatment with naltrexone.. Combining buprenorphine with behavioral interventions is significantly more efficacious in the treatment of opioid-dependent adolescents relative to combining clonidine and behavioral interventions.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Behavior Therapy; Buprenorphine; Clonidine; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Psychomotor Performance; Risk-Taking; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Treatment Outcome

With the growing role of intravenous drug use in the transmission of HIV infection, HIV-infected patients frequently present with comorbid opioid dependence. Yet, few empirical evaluations of the efficacy and consequences of opioid detoxification medications in medically ill HIV-infected patients have been reported. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we evaluated the impact of three medications on the signs and symptoms of withdrawal and on the pain severity in heroin-dependent HIV-infected patients (N=55) hospitalized for medical reasons on an inpatient AIDS service. Patients received a 3-day pharmacologic taper with intramuscular buprenorphine (n=21), oral clonidine (n=16), or oral methadone (n=18), followed by a clonidine transdermal patch on the fourth day. Observed and self-reported measures of opioid withdrawal and pain were taken 1-3 times daily for up to 4 days. Opiate administration used as medically indicated for pain was also recorded. Observer- and subject-rated opiate withdrawal scores decreased significantly following the first dose of medication and overall during treatment. Among all 55 subjects, self-reported and observer-reported pain decreased after treatment (on average observer-rated opioid withdrawal scale (OOWS) scores declined 5.6 units and short opioid withdrawal scale (SOWS) declined 4.8 units, P<0.001, for both) with no indication of increased pain during medication taper. There were no significant differences of pain decline and other measures of withdrawal between the three treatment groups. During the intervention period, supplemental opiates were administered as medically indicated for pain to 45% of the patients; only 34% of men versus 62% of women received morphine (P<0.05). These findings suggest buprenorphine, clonidine, and methadone regimens each decrease opioid withdrawal in medically ill HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adult; Buprenorphine; Clonidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Hospitalization; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Pain Measurement; Receptors, Opioid; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Treatment Outcome

Care for opioid users changed greatly in France in 1996 when general practitioners (GP) were allowed to prescribe high-dose sublingual buprenorphine (Subutex((R))) for maintenance treatment of major opioid dependence. In order to evaluate treatment benefits, a prospective epidemiological 2-year follow-up was initiated in May 1996 with the participation of 105 French GPs.. A cohort of outpatient opioid users who started high-dose sublingual buprenorphine maintenance therapy at study onset or who had recently started were included in a prospective epidemiological study by GPs involved in management of drug abusers. Patients were followed for 2 years with collection of standardized information at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The main evaluation criteria were follow-up by the same GP throughout the study and retention in the care system 2 years later. For patients who fulfilled these criteria, secondary end points were analyzed: information about buprenophine prescription, social status, and hepatitis B and C and HIV seroconversions.. The 101 GPs included 919 patients and 909 were analyzed 2 years later. At study onset, a majority of the patients (70.6%) were taking an ongoing maintenance treatment, 10.5% had previously received such a treatment and the treatment was initiated for 18.8%. At the end of the study, 508 patients (55.9%) were still being followed by the same GP and 101 (11.1%) were followed by another healthcare provider (another GP, hospital or specialized center). No information about the care giver was available for 82 patients (9%). Among the other patients, 123 (13.5%) were lost to follow-up, 24 (2.6%) had moved, 23 (2.6%) were incarcerated, 11 (1.2%) had successfully discontinued drug usage and 7 (0.8%) had died. Other reasons for unsuccessful follow-up by the same GP were mainly (for 6 patients each): relapse, switch to methadone, no medical information, non-compliance with scheduled controls. Among the patients followed by the same GP, declaration of heroin and drug intake significantly decreased (p<0.001), and social status (GAF scale) and TMSP evaluation significantly improved (p<0.001). The social situation (housing condition and work) also improved significantly (p<0.001). The rate of buprenorphine treatment was 84% with longer and less fractionated prescriptions. The HBV, HBC and HIV seroconversion rates were low in this high-risk population (2.7%, 4.1% and 0.8% respectively).. This two-year follow-up of 909 opioid users showed that nearly 70% of the patient remained within the healthcare system, mainly with the same GP or more rarely with another practitioner. Among the 508 patients still followed by the same GP, maintenance treatment with high-dose buprenorphine was observed in more than 80% of the patients. These patients had a significantly improved social status, a significant decrease in drug intake and a significant improvement in their social adaptation and severity of drug abuse.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Buprenorphine; Drug Prescriptions; Employment; Family Practice; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Housing; Humans; Male; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Socioeconomic Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) in a cohort of French patients infected by HIV through injection drug use (IDU), and the impact on adherence of buprenorphine ambulatory drug maintenance treatment (DMT) which has been widely introduced since 1996.. Adherence assessment at first visit after initiation of HAART in the MANIF2000 cohort study.. Patient's face-to-face and self-administered questionnaires. Univariate and logistic regression adjusted odds ratios (OR) to compare characteristics of non-adherent versus adherent patients.. Of the 164 patients, 34.8% took less than 80% of the prescribed HAART doses during the previous week. Decrease in viral load titres after initiation of HAART was significantly lower among non-adherent patients. After adjustment by logistic regression, non-adherence was associated with younger age, alcohol consumption, frequency of negative life-events during the prior 6 months and active drug use. However, IDU in buprenorphine DMT reached higher levels of adherence (78.1%) than ex-IDU (65.5%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.. Prescription of buprenorphine DMT may increase adherence to HAART among HIV-infected opiate-dependent patients. Reducing the negative impact of stressful life-events through psychosocial interventions should be considered, even for those who have stopped using drugs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Narcotics; Patient Compliance; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Surveys and Questionnaires

India is facing overlapping opioid injection and HIV epidemics among people who inject drugs (PWID) in several cities. Integrated Care Centers (ICCs) provide single-venue HIV and substance use services to PWID. We evaluated PWID engagement in daily observed buprenorphine treatment at 7 ICCs to inform interventions.. We analyzed 1-year follow-up data for PWID initiating buprenorphine between 1 January - 31 December 2018, evaluating receipt frequency, treatment interruptions (no buprenorphine receipt for 60 consecutive days with subsequent re-engagement), and drop-out (no buprenorphine receipt for 60 consecutive days without re-engagement). Using descriptive statistics, we explored differences between ICCs in the opioid-endemic Northeast region and ICCs in the emerging opioid epidemic North/Central region. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to determine predictors of treatment drop-out by 6 months.. 1312 PWID initiated buprenorphine (76% North/Central ICCs vs. 24% Northeast ICCs). 31% of PWID in North/Central, and 25% in Northeast ICCs experienced ≥ 1 treatment interruption in 1 year. Over 6 months, 48% of PWID in North/Central vs. 60% in Northeast ICCs received buprenorphine ≤ 2 times/week (p < 0.0001). A third of PWID in North/Central vs. half in Northeast ICCs experienced treatment drop-out by 6 months (p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, living in Northeast cities was associated with increased odds of drop-out while counseling receipt was associated with decreased odds.. Retention among PWID initiating buprenorphine at ICCs was comparable to global reports. However, regional heterogeneity in retention, and low daily buprenorphine receipt suggest patient-centered interventions adapted to regional contexts are urgently needed.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Drug Users; HIV Infections; Humans; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

As the opioid crisis continues to escalate, the management of patients with opioid use disorder has crossed over to the care of patients with chronic infectious diseases, specifically HIV, HBV, and HCV, typically managed in the primary care setting. Consensus guidelines recommend testing for HIV and hepatitis in persons who inject drugs at least annually, but high-risk sexual activity may put other patients at risk as well. Significant barriers to robust care of these patient populations include low rates of HIV and hepatitis testing, limited access to methadone treatment programs, lack of widespread knowledge of how to prescribe office-based opioid treatment, and ongoing stigma surrounding prescribing of HIV treatment and prophylaxis medications. Clinical pharmacists across ambulatory, infectious diseases, and opioid stewardship specialties have the opportunity to play a key role in the implementation and support of harm reduction and medication for opioid use disorder services in the outpatient setting. The goal of this article is to discuss the rationale and evidence for these services and provide a framework for implementation.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Drug Users; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

We use a novel, longitudinal approach to describe average time spent in opioid use disorder (OUD) cascade of care stages for people with HIV (PWH) and with OUD, incorporating four definitions of treatment retention. Using this approach, we describe the impact of cocaine or hazardous alcohol use on time spent retained on buprenorphine.. We followed PWH with OUD enrolled in the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort from their first buprenorphine treatment episode between 2013 and 2020. We estimated 4-year restricted mean time spent on buprenorphine below buprenorphine retention threshold, on buprenorphine above retention threshold, off buprenorphine and in HIV care, loss to follow-up, and death. Retention definitions were based on retention threshold (180 vs 90 days) and allowable treatment gap (7 vs 30 days). Differences in 2-year restricted mean time spent retained on buprenorphine were estimated for patients with and without cocaine or hazardous alcohol use.. The study sample (N = 179) was 63% male, 82% non-Hispanic Black, and mean age was 53 (SD 8) years. Patients spent on average 13.9 months (95% CI 11.4, 16.4) on buprenorphine over 4 years. There were differences in time spent retained on buprenorphine based on the retention definition, ranging from 6.5 months (95% CI 4.6, 8.5) to 9.6 months (95% CI 7.4, 11.8). Patients with cocaine use spent fewer months retained on buprenorphine. There were no differences for patients with hazardous alcohol use.. PWH with OUD spend relatively little time receiving buprenorphine in their HIV primary care clinic. Concurrent cocaine use at buprenorphine initiation negatively impact time on buprenorphine.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Cocaine; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opioid-Related Disorders

Expansion of opioid use disorder treatment is needed, particularly in rural communities.. To evaluate technology-assisted buprenorphine (TAB) efficacy (1) over a longer period than previously examined, (2) with the addition of overdose education, and (3) among individuals residing in rural communities.. Two parallel, 24-week randomized clinical trials were conducted at the University of Vermont between February 1, 2018, and June 30, 2022. Participants were adults with untreated opioid use disorder from nonrural (trial 1) or rural (trial 2) communities. These trials are part of a programmatic effort to develop TAB protocols to improve treatment availability in underserved areas.. Within each trial, 50 participants were randomized to TAB or control conditions. Participants in the TAB group completed bimonthly visits to ingest medication and receive take-home doses via a computerized device. They received nightly calls via an interactive voice response (IVR) system, IVR-generated random call-backs, and iPad-delivered HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and overdose education. Control participants received community resource guides and assistance with contacting resources. All participants received harm reduction supplies and completed monthly assessments.. The primary outcome was biochemically verified illicit opioid abstinence across monthly assessments. Secondary outcomes included self-reported opioid use in both groups and abstinence at bimonthly and random call-back visits, treatment adherence, satisfaction, and changes in HIV, HCV, and overdose knowledge among TAB participants.. Fifty individuals (mean [SD] age, 40.6 [13.1] years; 28 [56.0%] male) participated in trial 1, and 50 (mean [SD] age, 40.3 [10.8] years; 30 [60.0%] male) participated in trial 2. Participants in the TAB group achieved significantly greater illicit opioid abstinence vs controls at all time points in both trial 1 (85.3% [128 of 150]; 95% CI, 70.7%-93.3%; vs 24.0% [36 of 150]; 95% CI, 13.6%-38.8%) and trial 2 (88.0% [132 of 150]; 95% CI, 72.1%-95.4%; vs 21.3% [32 of 150]; 95% CI, 11.4%-36.5%). High abstinence rates were also observed at TAB participants' bimonthly dosing visits (83.0% [95% CI, 67.0%-92.0%] for trial 1 and 88.0% [95% CI, 71.0%-95.0%] for trial 2). Treatment adherence was favorable and similar between trials (with rates of approximately 99% for buprenorphine administration, 93% for daily IVR calls, and 92% for random call-backs), and 183 of 187 urine samples (97.9%) tested negative for illicit opioids at random call-backs. iPad-delivered education was associated with significant and sustained increases in HIV, HCV, and overdose knowledge.. In these randomized clinical trials of TAB treatment, demonstration of efficacy was extended to a longer duration than previously examined and to patients residing in rural communities.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03420313.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opioid-Related Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rural Population

The harms of opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV infection disproportionately impact marginalized populations, especially people experiencing homelessness and people who inject drugs (PWID). Mobile OUD service delivery models are emerging to increase access and reduce barriers to OUD care. While there is growing interest in these models, there is limited research about the services they provide, how they operate, and what barriers they face. We characterize the capacity, barriers, and sustainment of mobile OUD care services in a large city with a high incidence of OUD and HIV.. From May to August 2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews with leadership from all seven mobile OUD care units (MOCU) providing a medication for OUD or other substance use disorder services in Philadelphia. We surveyed leaders about their unit's services, staffing, operating location, funding sources, and linkages to care. Leaders were asked to describe their clinical approach, treatment process, and the barriers and facilitators to their operations. Interview recordings were coded using rapid qualitative analysis.. MOCUs are run by small, multidisciplinary teams, typically composed of a clinician, one or two case managers, and a peer recovery specialist or outreach worker. MOCUs provide a range of services, including medications for OUD, wound care, medical services, case management, and screening for infectious diseases. No units provide methadone, but all units provide naloxone, six write prescriptions for buprenorphine, and one unit dispenses buprenorphine. The most frequently reported barriers include practical challenges of working on a MOCU (e.g. lack of space, safety), lack of community support, and patients with substantial medical and psychosocial needs. Interviewees reported concerns about funding and specifically as it relates to providing their staff with adequate pay. The most frequently reported facilitators include positive relationships with the community, collaboration with other entities (e.g. local nonprofits, the police department, universities), and having non-clinical staff (e.g. outreach workers, peer recovery specialists) on the unit.. MOCUs provide life-saving services and engage marginalized individuals with OUD. These findings highlight the challenges and complexities of caring for PWID and demonstrate a need to strengthen collaborations between MOCU providers and the treatment system. Policymakers should consider programmatic funding for permanent mobile OUD care services.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid Epidemic; Opioid-Related Disorders; Philadelphia; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Rural, poor, persons with HIV (PWH) and substance use are among the most vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 and related health service disruptions. The objective of the study was to evaluate the health outcomes and utilization of PWH at an Outpatient-based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) Clinic.. We evaluated a clinic-based cohort at the University of Alabama at Birmingham HIV clinic from November 2018 to May 2021. We compared HIV outcomes of OBOT patients, who are highly vulnerable, to the overall clinic. We stratified OBOT patients according to comorbid stimulant use disorder and compared clinic utilization and viral load suppression in the 6 months before and after the safer at home mandate (May 2020) in Alabama.. Of 3857 PWH, 57 were referred to OBOT, 48 attended, 45 were initiated on buprenorphine, and 35 had a VL< 200 in the last 6 months. Relative to the overall HIV clinic, OBOT patients were significantly less likely to remain VL suppressed (90% vs 78%, p = 0.01). More patients were suppressed after OBOT linkage (81%) than prior (73%). For those referred before May 2020, there was no change in viral suppression before and after the safer at home order (75%). Although new OBOT referrals did not increase during the pandemic, the number of visits attended per month did increase from a median of 3-4 per patient.. Unlike many PWH who faced access barriers, PWH receiving care at OBOT did not fall out of care but increased healthcare utilization and maintained viral suppression despite the public health emergency.

Topics: Buprenorphine; COVID-19; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2

Cognitive dysfunction is disproportionately prevalent among persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Specific domains of cognitive dysfunction (attention, executive functioning, memory, and information processing) may significantly impede treatment outcomes among patients on medication for OUD (MOUD). This limits patient's ability to learn, retain, and apply information conveyed in behavioral intervention sessions. Evidence-based accommodation strategies have been integrated into behavioral interventions for other patient populations with similar cognitive profiles as persons with OUD; however, the feasibility and efficacy of these strategies have not yet been tested among patients on MOUD in a drug treatment setting.. We conducted a series of focus groups with 25 key informants (10 drug treatment providers and 15 patients on MOUD) in a drug treatment program in New Haven, CT. Using an inductive approach, we examined how cognitive dysfunction impedes participant's ability to retain, recall, and utilize HIV prevention information in the context of drug treatment.. Two main themes capture the overall responses of the key informants: (1) cognitive dysfunction issues and (2) accommodation strategy suggestions. Subthemes of accommodation strategies involved suggestions about particular evidence-based strategies that should be integrated into behavioral interventions for persons on MOUD. Specific accommodation strategies included: use of a written agenda, mindfulness meditation, multi-modal presentation of information, hands-on demonstrations, and a formal closure/summary of sessions.. Accommodation strategies to compensate for cognitive dysfunction were endorsed by both treatment providers and patients on MOUD. These accommodation strategies have the potential to enhance the efficacy of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV transmission among persons on MOUD as well as addiction severity, and overdose.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Vietnam

HIV clinicians are uniquely positioned to treat their patients with opioid use disorder using buprenorphine to prevent overdose death. The Prescribe to Save Lives (PtSL) study aimed to increase HIV clinicians' buprenorphine prescribing via an overdose prevention intervention.. The quasi-experimental stepped-wedge study enrolled 22 Ryan White-funded HIV clinics and delivered a peer-to-peer training to clinicians with follow-up academic detailing that included overdose prevention education and introduced buprenorphine prescribing. Site-aggregated electronic medical record (EMR) data measured with the change in X-waivered clinicians and patients prescribed buprenorphine. Clinicians completed surveys preintervention and at 6- and 12-month postintervention that assessed buprenorphine training, prescribing, and attitudes. Analyses applied generalized estimating equation models, adjusting for time and clustering of repeated measures among individuals and sites.. Nineteen sites provided EMR prescribing data, and 122 clinicians returned surveys. Of the total patients with HIV across all sites, EMR data showed 0.38% were prescribed buprenorphine pre-intervention and 0.52% were prescribed buprenorphine postintervention. The intervention increased completion of a buprenorphine training course (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.38 to 4.68, P = 0.003) and obtaining an X-waiver (adjusted odds ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 3.95, P = 0.02). There were nonsignificant increases at the clinic level, as well.. Although the PtSL intervention resulted in increases in buprenorphine training and prescriber certification, there was no meaningful increase in buprenorphine prescribing. Engaging and teaching HIV clinicians about overdose and naloxone rescue may facilitate training in buprenorphine prescribing but will not result in more treatment with buprenorphine without additional interventions.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Overdose; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Practice Patterns, Physicians'

Given substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with HIV are highly prevalent, integrating SUD services within HIV service settings is needed to help end the HIV epidemic. In this study, we assessed the setting-intervention fit (SIF) of 9 evidence-based SUD interventions: acamprosate, disulfiram, oral naltrexone, injectable naltrexone, oral buprenorphine, injectable buprenorphine, contingency management, motivational interviewing, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).. Clinical and nonclinical HIV service organizations (HSOs) in the United States.. In May 2020, a stakeholder-engaged real-time Delphi was completed with 202 HSOs. HSO respondents rated the extent to which each SUD intervention was fundable, implementable, retainable, sustainable, scalable, and timely for their HSO, and these 6 items were summed into an SIF score (possible range of 0-18).. Motivational interviewing had the highest average SIF score (11.42), with SIF scores above the midpoint (9.5) for clinical (11.51) and nonclinical HSOs (11.36). For nonclinical HSOs, none of the other interventions were above the midpoint. For clinical HSOs, the average SIF scores were above the midpoint for CBT (10.97) and oral buprenorphine (9.51). Multivariate regression analyses, which controlled for characteristics of the HSO respondent, revealed geographic region of the United States and whether the HSO currently offered any substance use services as 2 of the best predictors of SIF scores.. Notwithstanding the need to improve the SIF for the other evidence-based SUD interventions, motivational interviewing, CBT, and oral buprenorphine are currently the evidence-based SUD interventions with greatest perceived fit for integration within HSOs in the United States.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Delphi Technique; Evidence-Based Medicine; HIV Infections; Humans; Naltrexone; Substance-Related Disorders; United States

Although Africa has long borne the brunt of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, until recently, the continent has been considered largely free of illicit drug use and injection drug use in particular. In Uganda, the number of people who use or inject drugs (PWUD and PWID, respectively) has increased, and PWID are a key population at high risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, harm reduction practices, including providing clean injection equipment and medication-assisted treatment (MAT), have only recently been piloted in the country. This project aims to integrate buprenorphine into a harm reduction drop-in center (DIC).. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide our preparations to integrate buprenorphine into existing practices at a harm reduction DIC. We conducted key informant interviews with members of a community advisory board and DIC staff to document this process, its successes, and its failures.. Results indicate that criminalization of drug use and stigmatization of PWUD challenged efforts to provide buprenorphine treatment in less regulated community settings.. DIC staff and their commitment to harm reduction and advocacy facilitated the process of obtaining necessary approvals.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Harm Reduction; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance-Related Disorders; Uganda

Thirty-eight million people worldwide are living with HIV, PWH, a major public health problem. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) revolutionized HIV treatment and significantly increased the lifespan of PWH. However, approximately 15-50% of PWH develop HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HIV-NCI), a spectrum of cognitive deficits, that negatively impact quality of life. Many PWH also have opioid use disorder (OUD), and studies in animal models of HIV infection as well as in PWH suggest that OUD can contribute to HIV-NCI. The synthetic opioid agonist, buprenorphine, treats OUD but its effects on HIV-NCI are unclear. We reported that human mature inflammatory monocytes express the opioid receptors MOR and KOR, and that buprenorphine reduces important steps in monocyte transmigration. Monocytes also serve as HIV reservoirs despite effective ART, enter the brain, and contribute to HIV brain disease. Using EcoHIV infected mice, an established model of HIV infection and HIV-NCI, we previously showed that pretreatment of mice prior to EcoHIV infection reduces mouse monocyte entry into the brain and prevents NCI. Here we show that buprenorphine treatment of EcoHIV infected mice with already established chronic NCI completely reverses the disease. Disease reversal was associated with a significant reduction in brain inflammatory monocytes and reversal of dendritic injury in the cortex and hippocampus. These results suggest that HIV-NCI persistence may require a continuing influx of inflammatory monocytes into the brain. Thus, we recommend buprenorphine as a potential therapy for mitigation of HIV brain disease in PWH with or without OUD.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Brain Diseases; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Mice; Opioid-Related Disorders; Quality of Life; Receptors, Opioid

Buprenorphine is widely used in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). There are few pharmacokinetic models of buprenorphine across diverse populations. Population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) allows for covariates to be included in pharmacokinetic studies, thereby opening the potential to evaluate the effect of comorbidities, medications, and other factors on buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. This pilot study used POPPK to explore buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in patients with and without HIV receiving buprenorphine for OUD.. Plasma buprenorphine levels were measured in 54 patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD just prior to and 2-5 h following regular buprenorphine dosing. A linear one-compartment POPPK model with first-order estimation was used to evaluate buprenorphine clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Covariates included weight and HIV status.. All HIV+ patients reported complete past-month adherence to taking antiretroviral therapy that included either efavirenz or nevirapine. Buprenorphine CL/F was 76% higher in HIV+ patients (n = 17) than HIV- patients (n = 37). Buprenorphine V/F was 41% higher in the HIV+ patients.. POPPK can be used to model buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in a real-world clinical population. While interactions between ART and buprenorphine alter buprenorphine CL/F, we also found alteration in V/F. Proportionate changes in CL/F and V/F might indicate a primary effect on bioavailability (F) rather than two separate effects. These findings indicate reduced buprenorphine bioavailability in patients with HIV.

Topics: Biological Availability; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Nevirapine; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pilot Projects

A recent surge in HIV outbreaks, driven by the opioid and stimulant use crises, has destabilized our progress toward targets set forth by Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America for the high-priority community of people who inject drugs (PWID), particularly Black PWID.. In order to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of using a mobile syringe services program (SSP) for comprehensive HIV prevention via PrEP and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), our mixed methods approach included a quantitative assessment and semi-structured qualitative interviews with Black PWID (n = 30) in Miami-Dade County who were actively engaged in mobile syringe services.. Participants felt that delivery of MOUD and PrEP at a mobile SSP would be both feasible and acceptable, helping to address transportation, cost, and stigma barriers common within traditional healthcare settings. Participants preferred staff who are compassionate and nonjudgmental and have lived experience.. A mobile harm reduction setting could be an effective venue for delivering comprehensive HIV prevention services to Black PWID, a community that experiences significant barriers to care via marginalization and racism in a fragmented healthcare system.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Users; Feasibility Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Syringes

Non-prescribed opioid use is illegal in Vietnam. People who are apprehended for use of non-prescribed opioids may be arrested and incarcerated or sent to compulsory rehabilitation centers. For those on medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), incarceration in either setting may disrupt treatment. This study estimates the effects of incarceration and compulsory rehabilitation on MOUD and HIV treatment outcomes in Vietnam.. Data are from a clinical trial testing the effects of MOUD on HIV viral suppression in six Vietnamese HIV clinics. Participants were assessed quarterly for 12 months. We assessed the associations between incarceration or compulsory rehabilitation during months 0-9 and study outcomes of receipt of MOUD, HIV clinic engagement, and antiretroviral therapy prescription during months 9-12, among those who were released by month 9 of the study, using logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial models.. At nine months, 25 of 258 participants (9.7%) were incarcerated or sent to compulsory rehabilitation at least once and completed the month 9 assessment. Of those, 19 (76.0%) did not receive MOUD in months 9 through 12. Both incarceration and compulsory rehabilitation were negatively associated with subsequent receipt of MOUD (aOR = 0.05, 95% CI = (0.01, 0.24); 0.14 (0.04, 0.50), respectively) and HIV clinic engagement (aOR = 0.13, 95% CI = (0.03, 0.71); 0.09 (0.02, 0.39), respectively). In the final three months of the study, participants who were incarcerated had 42.5 fewer days of MOUD (95% CI = 23.1, 61.9), and participants in compulsory rehabilitation had 46.1 fewer days of MOUD (95% CI = 33.8, 58.4) than those not incarcerated or in compulsory rehabilitation.. Our findings suggest that both incarceration and compulsory rehabilitation disrupt MOUD and HIV treatment among people with HIV and Opioid Use Disorder in Vietnam. Prioritization of evidence-based strategies to support engagement in care for people who use drugs could potentially expand HIV and Opioid Use Disorder treatment access and curb substance use more effectively than reliance on incarceration or compulsory rehabilitation.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Vietnam

Persons with HIV (PWH) and opioid use disorder (OUD) can have poor health outcomes. We assessed whether intensity of behavioral treatment for OUD (BOUD) with and without medication for OUD (MOUD) is associated with improved HIV clinical outcomes.. We used Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) data from 2008 to 2017 to identify PWH and OUD with ≥1 BOUD episode. We assessed BOUD intensity and ≥6 months of MOUD (methadone or buprenorphine) receipt during the 12 months after BOUD initiation. Linear regression models assessed the association of BOUD intensity and MOUD receipt with pre-post changes in log viral load (VL), CD4 cell count, VACS Index 2.0, antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation, and ART adherence.. Among 2419 PWH who initiated BOUD, we identified five distinct BOUD intensity trajectories: single visit (39% of sample); low-intensity, not sustained (37%); high-intensity, not sustained (9%); low-intensity, sustained (11%); and high-intensity, sustained (5%). MOUD receipt was low (17%). Among 709 PWH not on ART at the start of BOUD, ART initiation increased with increased BOUD intensity (p < 0.01). Among 1401 PWH on ART at the start of BOUD, ART adherence improved more in higher-intensity BOUD groups (p < 0.01). VL, CD4 count and VACS Index 2.0 did not differ by BOUD or ≥6 months of MOUD treatment.. Among PWH and OUD who initiated BOUD, higher intensity BOUD was associated with improved ART initiation and adherence, but neither BOUD alone nor BOUD plus ≥6 months MOUD was associated with improvements in VL, CD4 count or VACS Index 2.0.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders

Approximately 15-40% of people living with HIV develop HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, HAND, despite successful antiretroviral therapy. There are no therapies to treat these disorders. HIV enters the CNS early after infection, in part by transmigration of infected monocytes. Currently, there is a major opioid epidemic in the United States. Opioid use disorder in the context of HIV infection is important because studies show that opioids exacerbate HIV-mediated neuroinflammation that may contribute to more severe cognitive deficits. Buprenorphine is an opioid derivate commonly prescribed for opiate agonist treatment. We used the EcoHIV mouse model to study the effects of buprenorphine on cognitive impairment and to correlate these with monocyte migration into the CNS. We show that buprenorphine treatment prior to mouse EcoHIV infection prevents the development of cognitive impairment, in part, by decreased accumulation of monocytes in the brain. We propose that buprenorphine has a novel therapeutic benefit of limiting the development of neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected opioid abusers as well as in nonabusers, in addition to decreasing the use of harmful opioids. Buprenorphine may also be used in combination with HIV prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis because of its safety profile.

Topics: AIDS Dementia Complex; Animals; Antigens, Ly; Brain; Buprenorphine; Chronic Disease; Cognitive Dysfunction; Disease Models, Animal; HIV Infections; Inflammation; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Monocytes; Phenotype; Viral Load

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders

Using a mobile research facility, we enrolled 141 opioid users from a neighborhood of Philadelphia, an urban epicenter of the opioid epidemic. Nearly all (95.6%) met DSM-5 criteria for severe opioid use disorder. The prevalence of HIV infection (8.5%) was more than seven times that found in the general population of the city. Eight of the HIV-positive participants (67.0%) reported receiving antiretroviral treatment but almost all of them had unsuppressed virus (87.5%). The majority of participants (57.4%) reported symptoms consistent with major depressive disorder. Severe economic distress (60.3%) and homelessness were common (57%). Polysubstance use was nearly universal, 72.1% had experienced multiple overdoses and prior medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment episodes (79.9%), but few currently engaged in addiction care. The prevalence, multiplicity and severity of chronic health and socioeconomic problems highlight consequences of the current opioid epidemic and underscore the urgent need to develop integrated models of treatment.. Utilizando un Centro de Investigación Móvil, inscribimos a 141 usuarios de opioides del vecindario de Filadelfia, un epicentro urbano de la epidemia de opioides. Casi todos (95,6%) cumplieron con los criterios del DSM-5 para el trastorno del uso severo del consumo de opioides. La prevalencia de la infección de VIH (8,5%) fue másﹶ de 7 veces superior a las encontrada en la población general de la ciudad. Ocho de los participantes con VIH positivo (67,0%) reportaron haber recibido tratamiento antirretroviral pero casi todos tuvieron virus no suprimido (87,5%). La mayoría de los participantes (57,4%) informaron síntomas compatibles con el Desorden Depresivo Mayor. La angustia severa por lo económico (60,3%) y las personas sin hogar fueron comunes (57%). El uso de múltiples sustancias fue casi universal, el 721% había experimentado múltiples sobredosis y previos medicamentos para el tratamiento del trastorno por consumo de opioides (MOUD) (79,9%), pero muy pocos estaban comprometidos con la atención a las adicciones. La prevalencia, la multiplicidad y la seriedad de los problemas de salud crónica y los problemas socioeconómicos destacan las consecuencias de la actual epidemia de opioides y subrayan la urgente necesidad de desarrollar nuevos modelos de tratamiento integrados.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Alkaloids; Opioid Epidemic; Opioid-Related Disorders; Philadelphia

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Maintenance; Methadone; Naloxone; Nitriles; Opioid-Related Disorders; Referral and Consultation; Vietnam

Hepatitis C and HIV are associated with opioid use disorders (OUD) and injection drug use. Medications for OUD can prevent the spread of HCV and HIV.. To describe the prevalence of documented OUD, as well as receipt of office-based medication treatment, among primary care patients with HCV or HIV.. Retrospective observational cohort study using electronic health record and insurance data.. Adults ≥ 18 years with ≥ 2 visits to primary care during the study (2014-2016) at 6 healthcare systems across five states (CO, CA, OR, WA, and MN).. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of OUD; the secondary outcome was OUD treatment with buprenorphine or oral/injectable naltrexone. Prevalence of OUD and OUD treatment was calculated across four groups: HCV only; HIV only; HCV and HIV; and neither HCV nor HIV. In addition, adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of OUD treatment associated with HCV and HIV (separately) were estimated, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and site.. The sample included 1,368,604 persons, of whom 10,042 had HCV, 5821 HIV, and 422 both. The prevalence of diagnosed OUD varied across groups: 11.9% (95% CI: 11.3%, 12.5%) for those with HCV; 1.6% (1.3%, 2.0%) for those with HIV; 8.8% (6.2%, 11.9%) for those with both; and 0.92% (0.91%, 0.94%) among those with neither. Among those with diagnosed OUD, the prevalence of OUD medication treatment was 20.9%, 16.0%, 10.8%, and 22.3%, for those with HCV, HIV, both, and neither, respectively. HCV was not associated with OUD treatment (AOR = 1.03; 0.88, 1.21), whereas patients with HIV had a lower probability of OUD treatment (AOR = 0.43; 0.26, 0.72).. Among patients receiving primary care, those diagnosed with HCV and HIV were more likely to have documented OUD than those without. Patients with HIV were less likely to have documented medication treatment for OUD.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prevalence; Primary Health Care; Retrospective Studies

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and buprenorphine decrease HIV acquisition. Between November, 2016 and July, 2017, we surveyed persons (N = 200) at a drug detoxification center to assess their interest in PrEP and in buprenorphine, and to examine factors associated with such interests. Over the previous 6 months, 58% (117/200) injected drugs, 87% (173/200) used opioids, 50% (85/171) had condomless sex. Only 22% (26/117) of persons who injected drugs were aware of PrEP, yet 74% (86/116) and 72% (84/116) were interested in oral or injectable PrEP, respectively. Thirty-eight percent (47/125) of persons not receiving buprenorphine or methadone expressed interest in buprenorphine. After multivariable adjustment, Latinx ethnicity was associated with interest in PrEP (aOR 3.80; 95% CI 1.37-10.53), while male gender (aOR 2.76; 95% CI 1.21-6.34) was associated with interest in buprenorphine. Opportunities exist to implement PrEP and buprenorphine within drug detoxification centers.Clinical trial registration NCT02869776. Clinicaltrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02869776?term=Sabrina+Assoumou&cond=HIV+HCV&rank=1 .

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Homosexuality, Male; Humans; Male; Opioid Epidemic; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

Opioid use is prevalent among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PLWH) and adversely affects HIV outcomes. We assessed the effect of buprenorphine (BUP) initiation on subsequent HIV viral loads.. We identified PLWH from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort who initiated BUP between 2002 and 2017. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to estimate the prevalence of viral suppression (<200 copies/mL) before and after BUP initiation. We matched individuals who initiated BUP with controls based on viral load measurement dates and used prior event rate ratio (PERR) methods to estimate the effect of BUP initiation on viral suppression. PERR methods account for unmeasured confounders.. We identified 279 PLWH who initiated BUP. After BUP initiation, PLWH were more likely to be virally suppressed (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.37). After matching PLWH who initiated BUP to controls and accounting for measured and unmeasured confounders, BUP initiation increased viral suppression for both those on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at baseline (PERR PR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.18) and those not on ART at baseline (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10-1.61).. Our results indicate that the initiation of BUP results in an increase in the probability of being virally suppressed after accounting for both measured and unmeasured confounders. Persons with opioid use disorder should initiate BUP to not only treat substance use but also to increase viral suppression allowing for treatment as prevention.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Viral Load

In 2017 alone, 783 000 children aged 12-17 years misused opioids with 14 000 using heroin. Opioid misuse and opioid use disorder (OUD) in adolescents and young adults are significant barriers to ending the HIV epidemic. To address these synergistic scourges requires dedicated practitioners and improved access to life-saving evidence-based treatment. Adolescents and young adults make up over one in five new HIV diagnoses even though they are less likely to be tested or know they are infected. Adolescents and young adults living with HIV are less likely to be retained in care or achieve virological suppression. OUD further leads to increased rates of risky behaviours (like sex without condoms), deceased retention in HIV care and decreased rates of viral suppression in this vulnerable population. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are recommended for adolescents and young adults with severe OUD and help retain youth in HIV treatment and decrease risk of death. However, due to stigma and lack of experience prescribing MOUD in adolescents, MOUD is often perceived as a last line option. MOUD remains difficult to access for adolescents with a shortage of providers and decreased options for treatment as compared to adults. Addiction treatment is infection prevention, and integrated addiction and HIV services are recommended to improve health outcomes. A multipronged approach including patient education, provider training and policy changes to improve access to treatment and harm reduction are urgently needed confront the drug use epidemic in youth.

Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Child; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; United States; Young Adult

medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine is now widely prescribed to treat addiction to heroin and other illicit opioids. There is some evidence that illicit opioids enhance HIV-1 replication and accelerate AIDS pathogenesis, but the effect of buprenorphine is unknown.. we obtained peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers and cultured them in the presence of morphine, buprenorphine, or methadone. We infected the cells with a replication-competent CCR5-tropic HIV-1 reporter virus encoding a secreted nanoluciferase gene, and measured infection by luciferase activity in the supernatants over time. We also surveyed opioid receptor expression in PBMC, genital epithelial cells and other leukocytes by qPCR and western blotting. Reactivation from latency was assessed in J-Lat 11.1 and U1 cell lines.. we did not detect expression of classical opioid receptors in leukocytes, but did find nociception/orphanin FQ receptor (NOP) expression in blood and vaginal lymphocytes as well as genital epithelial cells. In PBMCs, we found that at physiological doses, morphine, and methadone had a variable or no effect on HIV infection, but buprenorphine treatment significantly increased HIV-1 infectivity (median: 8.797-fold increase with 20 nM buprenorphine, eight experiments, range: 3.570-691.9,. our results suggest that buprenorphine, in contrast to morphine or methadone, increases the in vitro susceptibility of leukocytes to HIV-1 infection but has no effect on in vitro HIV reactivation. These findings contribute to our understanding how opioids, including those used for MAT, affect HIV infection and reactivation, and can help to inform the choice of MAT for people living with HIV or who are at risk of HIV infection.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Methadone; Morphine; Nociceptin Receptor; Receptors, Opioid; Virus Activation; Virus Latency; Virus Replication

This paper investigates the prevalence and predictors for opioid use disorder (OUD) pharmacotherapy utilization for Medicaid-insured patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in New York.. We identified patients with HIV and OUD in 2014 in the New York State Medicaid claims data (n = 5621). The claims were used to identify individual client medication for addiction treatment (MAT) utilization, demographic information, and other medical and psychiatric health conditions. The logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the potential predictors of MAT service utilization among people with HIV and OUD.. Of 5621 identified patients with HIV and OUD, 3647 (65%) received some type of MAT. Eighty-seven percent of treated patients received methadone while 10% received buprenorphine and 3% utilized both the therapies.. A substantial number of patients with HIV and OUD did not receive MAT. Findings suggest that there are opportunities to improve OUD care for patients with HIV and OUD, particularly among the younger generation, blacks, individuals living outside of New York City, and among those with serious psychiatric conditions. This initial study suggests that an additional research is needed to better understand how the gap in care affects this population. (Am J Addict 2020;29:151-154).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Drug Utilization; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Medicaid; Methadone; Middle Aged; New York; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; United States

Little is known about patient characteristics that contribute to initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) and achieving viral suppression among HIV people with opioid use disorder in Vietnam. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate associations between participant characteristics and the critical steps in the HIV care continuum of ART initiation and HIV viral suppression among people with opioid use disorder and HIV in Vietnam.. We assessed baseline participant characteristics, ART status, and HIV viral suppression (HIV RNA PCR < 200 copies/mL) enrolled in a clinical trial of HIV clinic-based buprenorphine versus referral for methadone among people with opioid use disorder in Vietnam. We developed logistic regression models to identify characteristics associated with ART status and HIV viral suppression.. Among 283 study participants, 191 (67.5%) were prescribed ART at baseline, and 168 of those on ART (90%) were virally suppressed. Years since HIV diagnosis (aOR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19) and being married (aOR = 2.83, 95% CI 1.51, 5.34) were associated with an increased likelihood of current prescription for ART at baseline. Greater depression symptoms were negatively associated with receipt of ART (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = (0.94, 0.9963)). In the HIV suppression model, once adjusting for all included covariates, only receipt of ART was associated with viral suppression (aOR = 25.9, 95% CI = (12.5, 53.8). In bivariate analyses, methamphetamine was negatively correlated with ART prescription (p = 0.07) and viral suppression (p = 0.08).. While fewer than 90% of participants had received ART, 90% of those on ART had achieved HIV viral suppression at baseline, suggesting that interventions to improve uptake of ART in Vietnam are essential for achieving UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals in people who use heroin in Vietnam. Social determinants of health associated with ART and HIV viral suppression suggest that social support may be a key to facilitating both of these steps in the HIV care continuum.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Continuity of Patient Care; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vietnam; Viral Load

Syringe services programs (SSPs) are able to offer wrap-around services for people who inject drugs (PWID) and improve health outcomes.. A 47-year-old man screened positive for a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) at an SSP and was referred to a weekly on-site student-run wound care clinic. He was evaluated by first- and third-year medical students, and volunteer attending physicians determined that the infection was too severe to be managed on site. Students escorted the patient to the emergency department, where he was diagnosed with a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus arm abscess as well as acute HIV infection.. Student-run wound care clinics at SSPs, in conjunction with ongoing harm reduction measures, screenings, and treatment services, provide a safety-net of care for PWID and help mitigate the harms of injection drug use.

Topics: Abscess; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Buprenorphine; Doxycycline; Harm Reduction; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Middle Aged; Needle-Exchange Programs; Opioid-Related Disorders; Soft Tissue Infections; Staphylococcal Infections; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Vancomycin

Neurocognitive dysfunction with buprenorphine has mixed evidence, with many confounding factors. We compared the neurocognitive functions in patients with opioid dependence on buprenorphine maintenance (Index Group; IG) with those on naltrexone (NG), opioid-dependent in early detoxification (OD), and healthy control (CG).. The four groups were matched for age, sex, and years of education. Except for the healthy control group (CG; n = 30), the two other comparison groups had twenty participants each. Subjects with other substance use disorders, HIV infection, head injury, epilepsy, and severe mental illness were excluded. Cognitive tests consisted of Trail Making Tests (TMT-A & B), Digit Vigilance test (DVT), verbal and visual N-Back Test (NBT), Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS).. IG performed significantly worse in TMT-B, DVT, verbal NBT, and WCST (non-perseverative error) than CG. When IQ was controlled for, significance persisted in TMT-B, a marker of poor cognitive flexibility. The OD showed significantly poorer performance than NG and CG in the TMT-A & B, visual and verbal NBT, DVT, and RAVLT. When compared to the IG, the performance of the OD was significantly poor in the TMT-A & B. IG performed worse than NG in TMT-B, and NG performed poorer (than CG) in RAVLT.. Patients on medication-assisted treatment had significant cognitive impairment limited to fewer cognitive domains, however, the extent and severity were highest in the group with active opioid dependence.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Control Groups; HIV Infections; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Opioid-Related Disorders

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an effective method of addiction treatment and HIV prevention. However, globally, people who inject drugs (PWID) have insufficient OAT uptake. To expand OAT access and uptake, policymakers, program developers and healthcare providers should be aware of barriers to and facilitators of OAT uptake among PWID.. As a part of the HPTN 074 study, which assessed the feasibility of an intervention to facilitate HIV treatment and OAT in PWID living with HIV in Indonesia, Ukraine, and Vietnam, we conducted in-depth interviews with 37 HIV-positive PWID and 25 healthcare providers to explore barriers to and facilitators of OAT uptake. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and coded in NVivo for analysis. We developed matrices to identify emergent themes and patterns.. Despite some reported country-specific factors, PWID and healthcare providers at all geographic locations reported similar barriers to OAT initiation, such as complicated procedures to initiate OAT, problematic clinic access, lack of information on OAT, misconceptions about methadone, financial burden, and stigma toward PWID. However, while PWID reported fear of drug interaction (OAT and antiretroviral therapy), providers perceived that PWID prioritized drug use over caring for their health and hence were less motivated to take up ART and OAT. Motivation for a life change and social support were reported to be facilitators.. These results highlight a need for support for PWID to initiate and retain in drug treatment. To expand OAT in all three countries, it is necessary to facilitate access and ensure low-threshold, financially affordable OAT programs for PWID, accompanied with supporting interventions. PWID attitudes and beliefs about OAT indicate the need for informational campaigns to counter misinformation and stigma associated with addiction and OAT (especially methadone).

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Overdose; Female; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Indonesia; Interviews as Topic; Male; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine; Vietnam

The purpose of this paper is to examine the current provision of opioid substitution therapy (OST) during and immediately following release from detention in prisons in England and Wales.. A group of experts was convened to comment on current practices and to make recommendations for improving OST management in prison. Current practices were previously assessed using an online survey and a focus group with experience of OST in prison (Webster, 2017).. Disruption to the management of addiction and reduced treatment choice for OST adversely influences adequate provision of OST in prison. A key concern was the routine diversion of opiate substitutes to other prisoners. The new controlled drug formulations were considered a positive development to ensure streamlined and efficient OST administration. The following patient populations were identified as having concerns beyond their opioid use, and therefore require additional considerations in prison: older people with comorbidities and complex treatment needs; women who have experienced trauma and have childcare issues; and those with existing mental health needs requiring effective understanding and treatment in prison.. Integration of clinical and psychosocial services would enable a joint care plan to be tailored for each individual with opioid dependence and include options for detoxification or maintenance treatment. This would better enable those struggling with opioid use to make informed choices concerning their care during incarceration and for the period immediately following their release. Improvements in coordination of OST would facilitate inclusion of strategies to further streamline this process for the benefit of prisoners and prison staff.

Topics: Age Factors; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Continuity of Patient Care; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; England; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methadone; Naltrexone; Narcotics; Needle Sharing; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prisons; Quality Improvement; Social Work; Wales

HIV-infected persons are more likely to have chronic pain, receive opioid analgesic treatment, receive higher doses of opioids, and to have substance use disorders and mental illness compared with the general population, putting them at increased risk for opioid use disorder. Management of opioid use in HIV-infected individuals can be complex, and the limited data on opioid treatment in this population are conflicting with regard to its effect on HIV outcomes. Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder improves HIV outcomes and other outcomes. This article summarizes a presentation by Chinazo O. Cunningham, MD, MS at the IAS-USA continuing education program, Improving the Management of HIV Disease, held in Atlanta, Georgia, in March 2017.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Chronic Pain; HIV Infections; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pain Management

The HIV treatment cascade is a crucial tool to guide HIV prevention and treatment strategies. The extent to which opioid agonist treatments (OATs) such as methadone and buprenorphine influence this cascade was examined in a nationwide study of people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine.. Cross-sectional stratified survey of PWID followed by HIV and hepatitis C virus testing in 5 Ukrainian cities.. Opioid-dependent PWID (N = 1613) were sampled from January 2014 to March 2015. Analysis was confined to 520 participants with HIV, with 184 (35.4%) prescribed OAT. Weighted logistic regression models were used to assess independent factors associated with the 5 steps in the HIV treatment cascade.. Compared with PWID not on OAT (N = 336), participants who prescribed OAT (N = 184) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed (91% vs. 71%), linked (81% vs. 52%), and retained (69% vs. 35%) in HIV care, and prescribed (56% vs. 31%) and optimally (>95% of doses) adherent to antiretroviral therapy (41% vs. 22%). Receiving OAT contributed most as an independent factor with every step of the cascade. Other steps in the HIV treatment cascade were influenced by age, depression, and geographical variability.. OAT remains an essential and effective strategy to not only treat patients with opioid use disorder, but also a crucial strategy to engage PWID in care to meet UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. Geographical differences suggest local structural impediments. With low OAT coverage prescribed for 2.9% of the estimated 347,000 PWID in Ukraine, OAT expansion requires strategic interventions that target the individual, clinical care settings, policies, and funding.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Cities; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome; Ukraine; Young Adult

This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) and methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) vs no opioid substitution therapy (OST) for the treatment of opioid use disorder, from the UK National Health Service (NHS)/personal social services (PSS) and societal perspectives over 1 year.. Cost-effectiveness of OST vs no OST was evaluated by first replicating and then expanding an existing UK health technology assessment model. The expanded model included the impact of OST on infection rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.. Versus no OST, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for BMT and MMT were £13,923 and £14,206 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively, from a NHS/PSS perspective. When total costs (NHS/PSS and societal) are considered, there are substantial savings associated with adopting OST; these savings are in excess of £14,032 for BMT vs no OST and £17,174 for MMT vs no OST over 1 year. This is primarily driven by a reduction in victim costs. OST treatment also impacted other aspects of criminality and healthcare resource use.. The model's 1-year timeframe means long-term costs and benefits, and the influence of changes over time are not captured.. OST can be considered cost-effective vs no OST from the UK NHS/PSS perspective, with a cost per QALY well below the UK's willingness-to-pay threshold. There were only small differences between BMT and MMT. The availability of two or more cost-effective options is beneficial to retaining patients in OST programs. From a societal perspective, OST is estimated to save over £14,032 and £17,174 per year for BMT and MMT vs no OST, respectively, due to savings in victim costs. Further work is required to fully quantify the clinical and health economic impacts of different OST formulations and their societal impact over the long-term.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Crime; Health Services; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Markov Chains; Methadone; Models, Economic; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; United Kingdom

Opioid agonist treatments (OAT) are widely-used, evidence-based strategies for treating opioid dependence and reducing HIV transmission. The positive benefits of OAT are strongly correlated with time spent in treatment, making retention a key indicator for program quality. This study assessed patient retention and associated factors in Ukraine, where OAT was first introduced in 2004.. Data from clinical records of 2916 patients enrolled in OAT at thirteen sites from 2005 to 2012 were entered into an electronic monitoring system. Survival analysis methods were used to determine the probability of retention and its correlates.. Twelve-month retention was 65.8%, improving from 27.7% in 2005, to 70.9% in 2011. In multivariable analyses, the correlates of retention were receiving medium and high doses of medication (compared to low doses, dropout aHR=0.57 for both medium and high doses), having not been tested for HIV and tuberculosis (compared to not being tested, dropout aHR=4.44 and 3.34, respectively), and among those who were tested-a negative TB test result (compared to receiving a positive test result, dropout aHR=0.67).. Retention in Ukrainian OAT programs, especially in recent years, is comparable to other countries. The results confirm the importance of adequate OAT dosing (≥60mg of methadone, ≥8mg of buprenorphine). Higher dosing, however, will require interventions that address negative attitudes toward OAT by patients and providers. Interruption of OAT, in the case developing tuberculosis, should incorporate continuity of OAT for TB patients through integrated care delivery systems.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Multivariate Analysis; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance; Patient Dropouts; Retrospective Studies; Tuberculosis; Ukraine

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major risk factor in the acquisition and transmission of HIV. Clinical practice guidelines call for the integration of HIV services in OUD treatment. This mixed methods study describes the integration of HIV services in buprenorphine treatment and examines whether HIV services vary by prescribers' medical specialty and across practice settings.. Data were obtained via qualitative interviews with buprenorphine experts (n = 21) and mailed surveys from US buprenorphine prescribers (n = 1174). Survey measures asked about screening for HIV risk behaviors at intake, offering HIV education, recommending all new patients receive HIV testing, and availability of on-site HIV testing. Prescribers' medical specialty, practice settings, caseload demographics, and physician demographics were measured. Multivariate models of HIV services were estimated, while accounting for the nesting of physicians within states.. Qualitative interviews revealed that physicians often use injection behaviors as the primary indicator for whether a patient should be tested for HIV. Interviews revealed that HIV-related services were often viewed as beyond the scope of practice among general psychiatrists. Surveys indicated that prescribers screened for an average of 3.2 of 5 HIV risk behaviors (SD = 1.6) at intake. About 62.0% of prescribers delivered HIV education to patients and 53.2% recommended HIV testing to all new patients, but only 32.3% offered on-site HIV testing. Addiction specialists and psychiatrists screened for significantly more HIV risk behaviors than physicians in other specialties. Addiction specialists and psychiatrists were significantly less likely than other physicians to offer on-site testing. Physicians in individual medical practice were significantly less likely to recommend HIV testing and to offer onsite testing than physicians in other settings.. Buprenorphine treatment providers have not uniformly integrated HIV-related screening, education, and testing services for patients. Differences by medical specialty and practice setting suggest an opportunity for targeting efforts to increase implementation.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Female; Health Personnel; Health Services; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Medicine; Middle Aged; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Education as Topic; Risk-Taking

Opioid agonist therapies (OAT) like methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment remain markedly under-scaled in Ukraine despite adequate funding. Clinicians and administrators were assembled as part of an implementation science strategy to scale-up OAT using the Network for Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) approach.. Nominal Group Technique (NGT), a key ingredient of the NIATx toolkit, was directed by three trained coaches within a learning collaborative of 18 OAT clinicians and administrators to identify barriers to increase OAT capacity at the regional "oblast" level, develop solutions, and prioritize local change projects. NGT findings were supplemented from detailed notes collected during the NGT discussion.. The top three identified barriers included: (1) Strict regulations and inflexible policies dictating distribution and dispensing of OAT; (2) No systematic approach to assessing OAT needs on regional or local level; and (3) Limited funding and financing mechanisms combined with a lack of local/regional control over funding for OAT treatment services.. NGT provides a rapid strategy for individuals at multiple levels to work collaboratively to identify and address structural barriers to OAT scale-up. This technique creates a transparent process to address and prioritize complex issues. Targeting these priorities allowed leaders at the regional and national level to advocate collectively for approaches to minimize obstacles and create policies to improve OAT services.

Topics: Budgets; Buprenorphine; Drug Users; Health Policy; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Ukraine's HIV epidemic is concentrated among people who inject drugs (PWID), however, coverage with opioid agonist therapies (OATs) available mostly at specialty addiction clinics is extremely low. OAT integrated into primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) provides an opportunity for integrating comprehensive healthcare services and scaling up OAT.. A pilot study of PHC-based integrated care for drug users conducted in two Ukrainian cities between 2014 and 2016 included three sub-studies: 1) cross-sectional treatment site preference assessment among current OAT patients (N=755); 2) observational cohort of 107 PWID who continued the standard of care versus transition of stabilized and newly enrolled PWID into PHC-based integrated care; and 3) pre/post analysis of attitudes toward PWID and HIV patients by PHC staff (N=26).. Among 755 OAT patients, 53.5% preferred receiving OAT at PHCs, which was independently correlated with convenience, trust in physician, and treatment with methadone (vs. buprenorphine). In 107 PWID observed over 6 months, retention in treatment was high: 89% in PWID continuing OAT in specialty addiction treatment settings (standard of care) vs 94% in PWID transitioning to PHCs; and 80% among PWID newly initiating OAT in PHCs. Overall, satisfaction with treatment, subjective self-perception of well-being, and trust in physician significantly increased in patients prescribed OAT in PHCs. Among PHC staff, attitudes towards PWID and HIV patients significantly improved over time.. OAT can be successfully integrated into primary care in low and middle-income countries and improves outcomes in both patients and clinicians while potentially scaling-up OAT for PWID.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Health Services Research; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Dropouts; Patient Satisfaction; Pilot Projects; Primary Health Care; Quality of Life; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Rapid HIV testing (RHT) greatly increases the proportion of clients who learn their test results. However, existing studies have not examined the adoption and implementation of RHT in programs treating persons with substance use disorders, one of the population groups at higher risk for HIV infection.. We examined 196 opioid treatment programs (OTPs) using data from the 2011 National Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey (NDATSS). We used logistic regressions to identify client and organizational characteristics of OTPs associated with availability of on-site RHT. We then used zero-inflated negative binomial regressions to measure the association between the availability of RHT on-site and the number of clients tested for HIV.. Only 31.6% of OTPs offered on-site rapid HIV testing to their clients. Rapid HIV testing was more commonly available on-site in larger, publicly owned and better-staffed OTPs. On the other hand, on-site rapid HIV testing was less common in OTPs that prescribed only buprenorphine as a method of opioid dependence treatment. The availability of rapid HIV testing on-site reduced the likelihood that an OTP did not test any of its clients during the prior year. But on-site availability rapid HIV testing was not otherwise associated with an increased number of clients tested for HIV at an OTP.. New strategies are needed to a) promote the adoption of rapid HIV testing on-site in substance use disorder treatment programs and b) encourage substance use disorder treatment providers to offer rapid HIV testing to their clients when it is available.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Mass Screening; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

Individuals with HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) infection, alcohol use disorder, or who are prescribed potentially hepatotoxic medications may be at increased risk for buprenorphine (BUP) associated hepatotoxicity.. We examined a cohort of HIV-infected and uninfected patients receiving an initial BUP prescription between 2003 and 2012. We compared changes in alanine and aspartate aminotransferases (ALT and AST) and total bilirubin (TB) stratified by HIV status. We identified cases of liver enzyme elevation (LEE), TB elevation (TBE), and conducted chart review to assess for cases of drug induced liver injury (DILI) and death. We examined associations between age, sex, race, HIV-infection, HCV-infection, alcohol use disorder, and prescription of other potentially heptatotoxic medications with the composite endpoint of LEE, TBE, and DILI.. Of 666 patients prescribed BUP, 36% were HIV-infected, 98% were male, 60% had RNA-confirmed HCV infection, 50% had a recent diagnosis of alcohol use disorder, and 64% were prescribed other potentially hepatotoxic medications. No clinically significant changes were observed in median ALT, AST and TB and these changes did not differ between HIV-infected and uninfected patients. Compared with uninfected patients, HIV-infected (OR 7.3, 95% CI 2.1-26.1, p=0.002), HCV-infected (OR 4.9 95% CI 1.6-15.2, p=0.007) or HIV/HCV co-infected patients (OR 6.9, 95%CI 2.1-22.2, p=0.001) were more likely to have the composite endpoint of LEE, TB elevation or DILI, in analyses that excluded 60 patients with evidence of pre-existing liver injury. 31 patients had LEE, 14/187 HIV-infected and 17/340 uninfected (p=0.25); 11 had TBE, including 9/186 HIV-infected and 2/329 uninfected (p=0.002); 8 experienced DILI, 4/202 HIV-infected and 4/204 uninfected (p=0.45). There were no significant associations with alcohol use disorder or prescription of other potentially hepatotoxic medications after adjustment for HIV/HCV status.. Liver enzymes and TB are rarely elevated in HIV-infected and uninfected patients receiving BUP. Risk of hepatotoxicity was greater in individuals infected with HIV, HCV, or HIV/HCV co-infection, who may benefit from increased monitoring.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Buprenorphine; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cohort Studies; Coinfection; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Factors

Ukraine has the highest HIV burden of any European country with much of the current HIV epidemic concentrated among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) and their sexual partners. Opiate substitution therapy (OST) is limited in Ukraine and expansion of OST is urgently needed to help stem the tide of the HIV epidemic.. We accessed publicly available data in Ukraine in order to explore geographic variability with respect to prevalence of HIV, PWIDs and OST programmes.. The regions of Ukraine with the largest number of opioid dependent persons (the south and eastern portions of the country) correspond to the regions with the highest HIV prevalence and HIV incidence. The number of opioid PWIDs per 100,000 population as well as the number of all OST treatment slots per 100,000 varied significantly across the three HIV prevalence categories. Overall, the proportion of individuals receiving either methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) or buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) was quite low: average across categories: 7.3% and 0.4%, respectively. Additionally, less than half of OST patients receiving MMT or BMT were HIV positive patients.. There is significant geographic variability in both numbers of HIV positive individuals and numbers of PWIDs across Ukraine, however, there may be a more concentrated epidemic among PWIDs in many regions of the country. Scale up of addiction treatment for PWID, especially OST, can have a significant impact on preventing injection related morbidity, such as HIV and HCV infection. Ukraine can learn from the mistakes other nations have made in denying critical treatment opportunities to PWID.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Prevalence; Sexual Partners; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Cocaine decreases methadone and buprenorphine plasma concentrations. HIV infection and/or antiretroviral medication use may impact these relationships. We sought to determine the association between recent cocaine use and methadone and buprenorphine concentrations in HIV-infected and uninfected subjects in clinical care. R- and S-methadone or buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were assessed at 0.5, 1, 2, and 24 hours after dosing in subjects with confirmed cocaine use and abstinence. We compared methadone and buprenorphine concentrations for cocaine use vs. abstinence, by HIV status in 16 subjects receiving methadone (6 HIV-infected) and 17 receiving buprenorphine (8 HIV-infected). With recent cocaine use, peak R-methadone (244 vs. 297 ng/mL, p = 0.03) and peak S-methadone (285 vs. 339 ng/mL); p = 0.03 concentrations were lower in HIV-uninfected subjects only. Peak buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were unchanged regardless of cocaine use or HIV status. Cocaine may decrease methadone concentrations in HIV-uninfected subjects. HIV infection or its treatment may attenuate cocaine's effect on methadone.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Cocaine; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Stereoisomerism; Time Factors

Opioids are among the most effective and commonly used analgesics in clinical practice for severe pain. However, the use of opioid medications is clinically limited by several adverse properties including dependence. While opioid dependence is a complex health condition, the treatment of HIV-infected individuals with opioid dependence presents additional challenges. The goal of this study was to examine the physical dependence to buprenorphine in the context of HIV.. Young adult male rats (Sprague-Dawley) were pretreated with HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein 120 (gp120) injected into the periaqueductal gray area (PAG) and we examined the impact on physical dependence to opioid.. It was found that the physical dependence to methadone occurred earlier than that to buprenorphine, and that gp120 did not enhance or precipitate the buprenorphine withdrawal.. The results suggest that buprenorphine could be the better therapeutic option to manage opioid dependence in HIV.

Topics: Animals; Buprenorphine; HIV Envelope Protein gp120; HIV Infections; Male; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pain; Periaqueductal Gray; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Patients with opioid use disorders on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) have lower pain tolerance compared to controls. While chronic viral infections such as HCV and HIV have been associated with chronic pain in this population, no studies have examined their impact on pain sensitivity.. We recruited 106 adults (41 uninfected controls; 40 HCV mono-infected; and 25 HCV/HIV co-infected) on buprenorphine or methadone to assess whether HCV infection (with or without HIV) was associated with increased experimental pain sensitivity and self-reported pain. The primary outcome was cold pain tolerance assessed by cold-pressor test. Secondary outcomes were cold pain thresholds, wind-up ratios to repetitive mechanical stimulation (i.e., temporal summation) and acute and chronic pain. Multivariable regression models evaluated associations between viral infection status and outcomes, adjusting for other factors.. No significant differences were detected across groups for primary or secondary outcomes. Adjusted mean cold pain tolerance was 25.7 (uninfected controls) vs. 26.8 (HCV mono-infection) vs. 25.3 (HCV/HIV co-infection) seconds (global p-value=0.93). Current pain appeared more prevalent among HCV mono-infected (93%) compared to HCV/HIV co-infected participants (76%) and uninfected controls (80%), as did chronic pain (77% vs. 64% vs. 61%, respectively). However, differences were not statistically significant in multivariable models.. This study did not detect an association between HCV infection and increased sensitivity to pain among adults with and without HIV who were treated with buprenorphine or methadone for opioid use disorders. Results reinforce that pain and hyperalgesia are common problems in this population.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Case-Control Studies; Coinfection; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pain Threshold

This article reviews research conducted in Baltimore over the past 15 years, examining the following: (1) What factors differentiate heroin-addicted individuals who enter methadone treatment from those who do not? (2) How difficult is gaining access to methadone treatment? (3) What are effective ways to overcome barriers to treatment entry? (4) Why do so many methadone patients drop out of treatment prematurely? (5) What are the added benefits of counseling when coupled with methadone or buprenorphine treatment? (6) Does increasing access to treatment have an impact on overdose deaths? Specific recommendations are made for policymakers concerned with addressing heroin addiction.

Topics: Baltimore; Buprenorphine; Counseling; Criminal Behavior; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Needs and Demand; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Risk Factors; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

To improve outcomes for people with substance dependence and HIV infection or at risk for HIV infection, patients were enrolled in a primary care-based addiction treatment program from 2008-2012 that included a comprehensive substance use assessment, individual and group counseling, addiction pharmacotherapy and case management. We examined whether predisposing characteristics (depression, housing status, polysubstance use) and an enabling resource (buprenorphine treatment) were associated with engagement in the program and persistent substance dependence at 6 months. At program enrollment 61% were HIV-infected, 53% reported heroin use, 46% reported alcohol use, 37% reported cocaine use, and 28% reported marijuana use in the past 30 days, 72% reported depression, 19% were homeless, and 53% had polysubstance use. Within 6-months 60% had been treated with buprenorphine. Engagement (defined as 2 visits in first 14 days and 2 additional visits in next 30 days) occurred in 64%; 49% had substance dependence at 6-months. Receipt of buprenorphine treatment was associated with engagement (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 8.32 95% CI: 4.13-16.77). Self-reported depression at baseline was associated with substance dependence at 6-months (AOR 3.30 95% CI: 1.65-6.61). Neither housing status nor polysubstance use was associated with engagement or substance dependence. The FAST PATH program successfully engaged and treated patients in a primary care-based addiction treatment program. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, was a major driver of addiction treatment engagement. Given depression's association with adverse outcomes in this clinical population, including mental health treatment as part of integrated care holds potential to improve addiction treatment outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Depression; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Ill-Housed Persons; Male; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Patient Compliance; Primary Health Care; Risk; Substance-Related Disorders; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Buprenorphine; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

To identify the extent to which clients in a national sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) received HIV testing in 2005 and 2011; to examine relationships between state laws for informed consent and pretest counseling and rates of HIV testing among OTP clients.. Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of OTPs in 2005 (n = 171) and 2011 (n = 200).. Random-effects logit and interval regression analyses were used to examine changes in HIV testing rates and the relationship of state laws to HIV testing among OTPs.. Data on OTP provision of HIV testing were collected in phone surveys from OTP managers; data also were collected on state laws for HIV testing.. The percentage of OTPs offering HIV testing decreased significantly from 93 percent in 2005 to 64 percent in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of clients tested decreased from an average of 41 percent in 2005 to 17 percent in 2011. OTPs located in states whose laws do not require pretest counseling and that use opt-out consent were more likely to provide HIV testing and to test higher percentages of clients.. The results show the need to increase HIV testing among OTP clients; the results also underscore the beneficial possibilities of dropping pretest counseling as a requirement for HIV testing and of using the opt-out approach to informed consent for testing.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Data Collection; Female; Health Services Research; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

The benefits of integrating primary care and substance use disorder treatment are well known, yet true integration is difficult. We developed and evaluated a team-based model of integrated care within the primary care setting for HIV-infected substance users and substance users at risk for contracting HIV. Qualitative data were gathered via focus groups and satisfaction surveys to assess patients' views of the program, evaluate key elements for success, and provide recommendations for other programs. Key themes related to preferences for the convenience and efficiency of integrated care; support for a team-based model of care; a feeling that the program requirements offered needed structure; the importance of counseling and education; and how provision of concrete services improved overall well-being and quality of life. For patients who received buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid dependence, this was viewed as a major benefit. Our results support other studies that theorize integrated care could be of significant value for hard-to-reach populations and indicate that having a clinical team dedicated to providing substance use disorder treatment, HIV risk reduction, and case management services integrated into primary care clinics has the potential to greatly enhance the ability to serve a challenging population with unmet treatment needs.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Counseling; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Female; Focus Groups; Health Services Needs and Demand; HIV Infections; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Satisfaction; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Qualitative Research; Quality of Life; Substance-Related Disorders; Young Adult

Opioid dependence is a major risk factor for HIV infection, however, the impact of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment on HIV risk behaviors among HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients is unknown.. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 303 HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients initiating buprenorphine/naloxone treatment. Outcomes included self-reported past 90-day needle-sharing and non-condom use. We assessed trends over the 12 months using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Using generalized estimating equations, after multiple imputation, we determined factors independently associated with needle-sharing and non-condom use, including time-updated variables. We then conducted a mediation analysis to determine whether substance use explained the relationship between time since treatment initiation and needle-sharing.. Needle-sharing decreased from baseline to the fourth quarter following initiation of buprenorphine/naloxone (9% vs. 3%, p<0.001), while non-condom use did not (23% vs. 21%, p=0.10). HIV risk behaviors did not vary based on the presence of a detectable HIV-1 RNA viral load. Patients who were homeless and used heroin, cocaine/amphetamines or marijuana were more likely to report needle-sharing. Heroin use fully mediated the relationship between time since treatment initiation and needle-sharing. Women, patients who identified as being gay/lesbian/bisexual, those married or living with a partner and who reported heroin or alcohol use were more likely to report non-condom use. Older patients were less likely to report non-condom use.. While buprenorphine/naloxone is associated with decreased needle-sharing among HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients, sexual risk behaviors persist regardless of viral load. Targeted interventions to address HIV risk behaviors among HIV-infected opioid-dependent populations receiving buprenorphine/naloxone are needed.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle Sharing; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking; Unsafe Sex

Evaluation of State Opioid Substitution Treatment OST (methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone- Addnok-N) program in Georgia and optimization of the routine measurement instrument. Patients were recruited from 4 Tbilisi and 5 regional State Programs in May-October 2013. 2 structured self-questionnaires (one - anonymous for sensitive questions) were developed for patients to assess demographics, retention in treatment, mean drug dose, HIV and Hepatitis C and B status, illicit drug and alcohol use, social activities, crime involvement, health status, HIV risk behavior, treatment compliance and satisfaction. 608 patients (7 females) were surveyed (512 - on Methadone, 96 - on buprenorphine/naloxone). 337 (1 female) patients completed an anonymous questionnaire. Mean age - 39.43±8.7 (21-65 years). 10 (1.64%) respondents were HIV positive; 448 (73.68%) - HCV+ and 24 (3.95%) - HBV+; average methadone dose - 39.27±22.2mg; buprenorphine/naloxone - 7.4±3.6 mg; 64 (40%) of employed began working while in program; 365 (60%) have been in treatment for less than 1 year, and 146 (24%) - for 1-3 years vs. 258 (51%) out of 506 patients surveyed in 2011. 494 (81.2%) reported improvement of social status and 508 (83.5%) - of health status. 305 (90.5%) out of 337 reported no- and 30 (8.9%) - reduction of criminal activity. 467 (76.81%) patients attended individual and 200 (32.9%)-group psychotherapy sessions with various frequencies. The common adverse events: sleep disturbances - 48.84%; weakness - 50.82%; mood disturbances - 42.44%, and heaviness - 36.35%. 257 (46%) reported using of alcohol; 16 - opioids; 29 - sedative/hypnotics; 8 - marijuana and 1 - ATS past 30 days; 55 - drug injection and 11 - sharing of any injection equipment past 6 months. State OST program is effective in Georgia in terms of reduction of illegal drug use, injection risk behavior and criminal activity, and on the other hand - improving of social activity and general health. Treatment retention is less as compared with 2011 survey.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alcoholism; Buprenorphine; Female; Georgia (Republic); Government Programs; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Patient Compliance; Patient Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

Topics: Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Reduction Behavior

Topics: Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Reduction Behavior

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Users; Health Services; Health Services Research; HIV Infections; Humans; Needle-Exchange Programs; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Pakistan; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Ukraine has made progress in introducing opioid substitution therapy since 2004, but the coverage of these services remains inadequate while injecting drug use continues to drive the country's HIV epidemic. Gary Humphreys reports.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Interactions between HIV and opioid-dependence therapies are known to occur. We sought to determine if such interactions occurred between buprenorphine/naloxone and elvitegravir boosted with cobicistat.. We performed a within-subject open-labeled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study in 17 HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 2 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone therapy. Subjects underwent baseline and steady state evaluation of the effect of elvitegravir 150 mg once daily boosted with 150 mg once daily of cobicistat (EVG/COBI) on buprenorphine/naloxone parameters. Safety was monitored throughout the study.. Compared with baseline values, buprenorphine mean AUCtau (69.0 versus 95.6 hr*ng/mL) and mean Cmax (8.4 versus 9.3 ng/mL) increased significantly in the presence of EVG/COBI. Compared with baseline values, norbuprenorphine mean AUCtau (103.4 versus 163.4 hr*ng/mL) and mean Cmax (6.9 versus 9 ng/mL) also increased significantly after achieving steady state EVG/COBI. Naloxone mean AUCtau (0.57 versus 0.45 hr*ng/mL) and mean Cmax (0.25 versus 0.16 ng/mL) decreased after the addition of EVG/COBI. The AUCtau, Cmax and Ctau of EVG and cobicistat did not significantly differ from historical controls. Opioid withdrawal or overdose was not observed among subjects in this study.. The addition of EVG/COBI to stabilized patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone modestly increased buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels without affecting the opioid pharmacodynamics.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Area Under Curve; Buprenorphine; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Quinolones; Thiazoles

Despite the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for annual HIV testing of at-risk populations, including those with substance use disorders, there are no data on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing practices of buprenorphine-prescribing physicians.. To describe HIV testing practices among buprenorphine-prescribing physicians.. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians enrolled in a national system to support buprenorphine prescribing between July and August 2008. The electronic survey included questions on demographics; clinical training and experience; clinical practice; patient characteristics; and physician screening practices, including HIV testing.. Only 46% of 382 respondent physicians conducted HIV testing. On univariate analysis, physicians who conducted HIV testing were more likely to report addiction specialty training (33% vs 19%, P = 0.001), practicing in addiction settings (28% vs 16%, P = 0.006), and having treated more than 50 patients with buprenorphine (50% vs 31%, P < 0.0001) than those who did not. Compared with physicians who did not conduct HIV testing, physicians who conducted HIV testing had a lower proportion of buprenorphine patients who were white (75% vs 82%, P = 0.01) or dependent upon prescription opioids (57% vs 70%, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, physicians who conducted HIV testing were more likely to have treated more than 50 patients with buprenorphine (odds ratio = 1.777, 95% CI 1.011-3.124) and had fewer patients dependent upon prescription opioids (odds ratio = 0.986 95% CI 0.975-0.998) than physicians who did not.. Interventions to increase HIV testing among physicians prescribing buprenorphine are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; AIDS Serodiagnosis; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Risk-Taking; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; Utilization Review; Young Adult

This article explores the burgeoning advocacy movement for methadone and buprenorphine treatment by patients, parents, and doctors in Ukraine, and their efforts to remake a system that infantilizes and controls patients into one where patients have a voice in their treatment. Through a review of gray literature and in-depth interviews with 28 patient-advocates and doctors in five Ukrainian cities between October 2009 and July 2010, this piece chronicles the emergence of opiate substitution treatment in Ukraine, describes successes toward patient-friendly treatment, and explores the institutionalized barriers that have pushed the patients to become advocates for their own treatment.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Drug Users; Female; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Advocacy; Patient Participation; Police; Self Efficacy; Ukraine; Urban Population

Buprenorphine is associated with enhanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment outcomes including increased antiretroviral therapy initiation rates, adherence, and CD4 cell counts among HIV-infected opioid-dependent individuals. Buprenorphine facilitates hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in opioid-dependent patients with HCV monoinfection. Less is known about buprenorphine's role in HIV/HCV coinfection.. We conducted a retrospective chart review to evaluate HCV care for HIV-infected buprenorphine patients in the first 4 years of buprenorphine's integration into a Rhode Island HIV clinic.. Sixty-one patients initiated buprenorphine. All had HCV antibody testing; 57 (93%) were antibody-positive. All antibody-positive patients underwent HCV RNA testing; 48 (84%) were RNA-positive. Of these, 15 (31%) were not referred to HCV care. Among chronically infected patients, 3 received HCV treatment after buprenorphine; all had cirrhosis and none achieved viral eradication. At buprenorphine induction, most patients had inadequately controlled HIV infection, with detectable HIV RNA (59%) or CD4 cell count less than or equal to 350/μL (38%).. Buprenorphine has shown limited success to date as a bridge to HCV treatment within an HIV clinic. Buprenorphine's stabilization of opioid dependence and HIV disease may permit the use of HCV therapy over time.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotics; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Retrospective Studies; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

HIV-infected prisoners lose viral suppression within the 12 weeks after release to the community. This prospective study evaluates the use of buprenorphine/naloxone (BPN/NLX) as a method to reduce relapse to opioid use and sustain viral suppression among released HIV-infected prisoners meeting criteria for opioid dependence (OD).. From 2005-2010, 94 subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for OD were recruited from a 24-week prospective trial of directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAART) for released HIV-infected prisoners; 50 (53%) selected BPN/NLX and were eligible to receive it for 6 months; the remaining 44 (47%) selected no BPN/NLX therapy. Maximum viral suppression (MVS), defined as HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL, was compared for the BPN/NLX and non-BPN/NLX (N = 44) groups.. The two groups were similar, except the BPN/NLX group was significantly more likely to be Hispanic (56.0% v 20.4%), from Hartford (74.4% v 47.7%) and have higher mean global health quality of life indicator scores (54.18 v 51.40). MVS after 24 weeks of being released was statistically correlated with 24-week retention on BPN/NLX [AOR = 5.37 (1.15, 25.1)], having MVS at the time of prison-release [AOR = 10.5 (3.21, 34.1)] and negatively with being Black [AOR = 0.13 (0.03, 0.68)]. Receiving DAART or methadone did not correlate with MVS.. In recognition that OD is a chronic relapsing disease, strategies that initiate and retain HIV-infected prisoners with OD on BPN/NLX is an important strategy for improving HIV treatment outcomes as a community transition strategy.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prisoners; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders

This study was part of a national, multisite demonstration project evaluating the impact of integrated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment and HIV care. The goals of this study were to describe the baseline demographic, clinical, and substance use characteristics of the participants and to explore HIV transmission risk behaviors in this group.. Nine sites across the United States participated. Data obtained by interview and chart review included demographic information, medical history, substance use, and risk behaviors.We performed a descriptive analysis of patient characteristics at entry and used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with 1) unprotected anal or vaginal sex; and 2) needle-sharing within the previous 90 days.. Three hundred eighty-six individuals were included in the study: 303 (78.5%) received buprenorphine/naloxone; 41 (10.6%) received methadone; and 42 (10.9%) received another form of treatment. The analysis of risk behaviors was limited to those in the buprenorphine group (n = 303). Among those reporting vaginal or anal sex in the previous 90 days, 24% had sex without a condom. Factors significantly associated with unprotected sex were: having a partner; female gender; and alcohol use in previous 30 days. A total of 8.9% of participants shared needles in the previous 90 days. Factors significantly associated with needle-sharing were: amphetamine use; marijuana use; homelessness; and anxiety.. Addressing transmission risk behaviors is an important secondary HIV prevention strategy. In addition to treatment for opioid dependence, addressing other substance use, social issues, particularly housing, and mental health may have important implications for reducing HIV transmission in HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle Sharing; Odds Ratio; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking; Unsafe Sex

A Health Resources and Services Administration-Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration collaboration was established to improve health outcomes for opiate-dependent HIV-infected patients through promotion of integrated models of HIV primary care and substance abuse treatment. The collaboration comprised 10 demonstration sites coordinated by a technical assistance/evaluation center that worked to refine planned interventions, address state-of-the-art treatment and policy issues relating to the use of buprenorphine opioid abuse treatment in HIV primary care settings, conduct local and multisite evaluations, and disseminate program findings. This article describes the goals and objectives of the collaborative as well as the interagency interactions and steps taken to establish the collaborative.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; United States

Opioid dependence and HIV infection are associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nx) provided in HIV care settings may improve HRQOL.. We surveyed 289 HIV-infected opioid-dependent persons treated with clinic-based bup/nx about HRQOL using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) administered at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. We used normalized SF-12 scores, which correspond to a mean HRQOL of 50 for the general US population (SD 10, possible range 0-100). We compared mean normalized mental and physical composite and component scores in quarters 1, 2, 3, and 4 with baseline scores using generalized estimating equation models. We assessed the effect of clinic-based bup/nx prescription on HRQOL composite scores using mixed effects regression with site as random effect and time as repeated effect.. Baseline normalized SF-12 scores were lower than the general US population for all HRQOL domains. Average composite mental HRQOL improved from 38.3 (SE 12.5) to 43.4 (SE 13.2) [β 1.13 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.54)] and composite physical HRQOL remained unchanged [β 0.21 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.57)] over 12 months follow-up. Continued bup/nx treatment across all 4 quarters was associated with improvements in both physical [β 2.38 (95% CI: 0.63 to 4.12)] and mental [β 2.51 (95% CI: 0.42 to 4.60)] HRQOL after adjusting for other contributors to HRQOL.. Clinic-based bup/nx maintenance therapy is potentially effective in ameliorating some of the adverse effects of opioid dependence on HRQOL for HIV-infected populations.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Quality of Life

Research has shown that buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nx) is a safe and effective treatment for opioid dependence. Few reports, however, describe the patient perspective on bup/nx treatment and its integration into HIV care settings.. We conducted qualitative interviews with 33 patients to further investigate patient satisfaction and experience with bup/nx treatment and integrated care. Interviews focused on drug use/cessation history; attitudes toward and satisfaction with bup/nx treatment; and perspectives on integrated bup/nx treatment and HIV care.. Patients were overwhelmingly satisfied with the pharmacologic effects and treatment outcomes of bup/nx, including effectiveness in blocking cravings and controlling opioid use; decreased fear of withdrawal and/or missing doses; and an overall improvement in quality of life. Patients also described being more engaged with both their substance abuse treatment and HIV care, including greater ability to manage their own treatment, keep, appointments, and adhere to antiretroviral medication regimes. Counseling was seen by some patients as an important component of bup/nx treatment. Nearly all were positive about their experience with integrated care, appreciative of an improved drug treatment environment, convenience, and quality of care.. Findings suggest that patients report bup/nx to be a viable treatment and many prefer it to other opioid replacement therapies.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Counseling; Data Collection; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Satisfaction

The safety of buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nx) in HIV-infected patients has not been established. Prior reports raise concern about hepatotoxicity and interactions with atazanavir.. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 303 opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients initiating bup/nx treatment. We assessed changes in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) over time. We compared bup/nx doses in patients receiving the antiretroviral atazanavir to those not receiving atazanavir. We conducted surveillance for pharmacodynamic interactions.. Median AST [37.0 vs. 37.0 units/liter (U/L) respective interquartile ranges (IQRs) 26-53 and 26-59] and ALT (33.0 vs. 33.0 U/L, respective IQRs 19-50 and 18-50) values did not change over time among 141 patients comparing pre-bup/nx exposure with post-bup/nx exposure measures. During bup/nx exposure, 207 subjects demonstrated no significant change in median AST (36.0 vs. 35.0 U/L, respective IQRs 25-57 and 25-61) and ALT (29.0 vs. 31.0 U/L, respective IQRs 19-50 and 18-50) values collected a median of 6 months apart. Analyses restricted to patients with hepatitis C and HIV co-infection yielded similar results, except a small but significant decrease in first to last AST, during treatment with bup/nx (P = 0.048). Mean bup/nx dose, ranging 16.0-17.8 mg, did not differ over time or with co-administration of atazanavir. No pharmacodynamic interactions were noted.. Buprenorphine/naloxone did not produce measurable hepatic toxicity or pharmacodynamic interaction with atazanavir in HIV-infected opioid-dependent patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Oligopeptides; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines

Cocaine use is common in opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients, but its impact on treatment outcomes in these patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone is not known.. We conducted a prospective study in 299 patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone who provided baseline cocaine data and a subset of 266 patients who remained in treatment for greater than or equal to one quarter. Assessments were conducted at baseline and quarterly for 1 year. We evaluated the association between baseline and in-treatment cocaine use on buprenorphine/naloxone retention, illicit opioid use, antiretroviral adherence, CD4 counts, HIV RNA, and risk behaviors.. Sixty-six percent (197 of 299) of patients reported baseline cocaine use and 65% (173 of 266) of patients with follow-up data reported in-treatment cocaine use. Baseline and in-treatment cocaine use did not impact buprenorphine/naloxone retention, antiretroviral adherence, CD4 lymphocytes, or HIV risk behaviors. However, baseline cocaine use was associated with a 14.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-24.2) times greater likelihood of subsequent cocaine use (95% CI, 9.0-24.2), a 1.4 (95% CI, 1.02-2.00) times greater likelihood of subsequent opioid use, and higher log10 HIV RNA (P < 0.016) over time. In-treatment cocaine use was associated with a 1.4 (95% CI, 1.01-2.00) times greater likelihood of concurrent opioid use.. Given cocaine use negatively impacts opioid and HIV treatment outcomes, interventions to address cocaine use in HIV-infected patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle Sharing; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Unsafe Sex

Replication of effective practices requires detailed descriptions of implementation processes, barriers and facilitators, and lessons learned. The experiences of physicians leading the Buprenorphine HIV Evaluation and Support initiative provides valuable information for other HIV providers seeking to integrate medication-assisted treatment services into HIV clinical care.. Evaluation staff conduced site visits to the 10 funded Buprenorphine HIV Evaluation and Support programs to better understand buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nx) integration practices; services offered; staffing; provider experiences with and perceptions of bup/nx; perceived barriers, facilitators, and sustainability; and recommendations regarding replication of integrated care program components. Interviews with site principal investigators conducted during the last year of program implementation were transcribed, coded, and analyzed according to both pre-identified and emerging themes.. Integrated bup/nx and HIV treatment was successfully introduced to community and hospital-based clinics under the direction of infectious disease, psychiatry, and general internal medicine physicians. All but 1 of the principal investigators interviewed were highly satisfied with integrated HIV and bup/nx treatment, and all anticipated continued provision of the service. Multiple prescribers were necessary to ensure sufficient coverage and a bup/nx coordinator (eg, nurse, counselor) was seen as essential to the provision of quality care. Ongoing challenges included multisubstance use and mental health issues among patients; limited adoption of bup/nx treatment among colleagues; and the necessity of incorporating new procedures, including urine toxicology testing into established practice.. Findings suggest that integrated bup/nx treatment and HIV care is acceptable to providers and feasible in a variety of practice settings.

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Health Resources; Health Services Needs and Demand; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; United States

Opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients are less likely to receive HIV quality of care indicators (QIs) compared with nondependent patients. Buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance therapy (bup/nx) could affect the quality of HIV care for opioid-dependent patients.. We abstracted 16 QIs from medical records at nine HIV clinics 12 months before and after initiation of bup/nx versus other treatment for opioid dependence. Summary quality scores (number of QIs received/number eligible × 100) were calculated. We compared change in QIs and summary quality scores in patients receiving bup/nx versus other participants.. One hundred ninety-four of 268 participants (72%) received bup/nx and 74 (28%) received other treatment. Mean summary quality scores increased over 12 months for participants receiving bup/nx (45.6% to 51.6%, P < 0.001) but not other treatment (48.6% to 47.8%, P = 0.788). Bup/nx participants experienced improvements in six of 16 HIV QIs versus three of 16 QIs in other participants. Improvements were mostly in preventive and monitoring care domains. In multivariable analysis, bup/nx was associated with improved summary quality score (β 8.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-15.0).. In this observational cohort study, HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence received approximately half of HIV QIs at baseline. Buprenorphine treatment was associated with improvement in HIV QIs at 12 months. Integration of bup/nx into HIV clinics may increase receipt of high-quality HIV care. Further research is required to assess the effect of improved quality of HIV care on clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Cohort Studies; Female; Guideline Adherence; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Health Care

Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers have long recognized the potential benefits of providing integrated substance abuse and medical care services, particularly for special populations such as people living with HIV/AIDS. Buprenorphine, an office-based pharmacological treatment for opioid dependence, offers new opportunities for integrating drug treatment into HIV care settings. However, the historical separation between the drug treatment and medical care systems has resulted in a host of policy barriers. The Buprenorphine and HIV Care Evaluation and Support initiative, a multisite demonstration project to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating buprenorphine/naloxone into HIV care settings, provided an opportunity to evaluate if and how policy barriers affect efforts to integrate HIV care and addiction treatment. We found that financing issues, workforce and training issues, and the operational consequences of some conceptual differences between HIV care and addiction treatment are barriers to the full integration of buprenorphine into HIV care. We recommend changes to financing and reimbursement policies, programs to strengthen the addiction treatment skills of physicians, and cross training between the fields of addiction, medicine, drug treatment, and HIV medicine. By addressing some of the policy barriers to integration, this promising new treatment can help the thousands of people living with HIV/AIDS who are also opioid dependent.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Health Policy; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opiate Substitution Treatment; United States

Implementing integrated HIV and buprenorphine/naloxone treatment requires cost estimates to plan and obtain funding.. We identified costs incurred at HIV clinical sites participating in a cross-site evaluation of integrated care that followed patients for 1 year. Costs include labor, overhead, and urine toxicology analyses (clinic perspective), buprenorphine/naloxone (payer perspective) and patient time and transportation (patient perspective). Sites provided resource utilization quarterly, and providers estimated time required for each activity. With site as the unit of analysis, results are reported as median (range) of average site costs in 2008 US dollars.. The median number of monthly provider encounters for integrated care patients was 3.2 (1.5-13.3) compared with 1.7 (1.1-4.2) for similar patients not in integrated care, but integrated care patients had fewer physician encounters. Median monthly clinic costs per integrated care patient were $136 ($67-$677) for labor and overhead and $8 ($2-$23) for toxicology analyses, $22 higher than clinic costs for patients not in integrated care. Median monthly costs for buprenorphine/naloxone were $209 ($165-$272), and monthly patient costs in integrated care were $11 ($1-$54) higher.. Integrated HIV and buprenorphine/naloxone treatment requires different resources, including costs that are not third-party reimbursed. Implementing integrated care will require funding for training and for new staff such as buprenorphine coordinators, in addition to reimbursement for buprenorphine/naloxone. Further research is needed to identify potential cost offsets outside of the clinic setting.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders

By recounting the making of the office that contributed to the implementation of the harm reduction policy in Taiwan, this paper aims to answer two questions: Who and what assembled to make this policy possible? Which conceptual tool works best to understand what this policy-making was all about?. The research was designed as a multi-sited qualitative study whose materials were collected through archival research, in-depth interviews, and direct field observation. The data were analysed on the basis of the constructivist version of grounded theory.. Formulating the office as an assemblage with heterogeneous components and shifting territories, the present work endeavours to show how it was constituted by way of guanxi, or webs of social relationship that blur the boundary between the private and the public, the governmental and the social.. This "studying up" approach is hoped to elicit more research on the office in which harm reduction policies are made into the backdrop of drug users on the street.

Topics: Administrative Personnel; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Drug and Narcotic Control; Drug Users; Government Regulation; Harm Reduction; Health Policy; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Methadone; Naloxone; Needle-Exchange Programs; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Policy Making; Private Sector; Qualitative Research; Social Behavior; Speech; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Taiwan

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Opioid-Related Disorders

Opioid substitution therapy (OST) in the Ukraine was not provided until 2004. Methadone maintenance therapy only became available in May 2008. Injecting drug users in Ukraine are predominantly injecting self-made opioid solution ('Shirka'). A feasibility study on buprenorphine and methadone maintenance treatment was conducted in 2008.. A total of 331 opioid dependent patients were given buprenorphine (n=191) or methadone (n=140) as a substitute, and a survey of substance use, HIV transmission risks, and legal and social status was conducted at baseline and at six months follow-up.. Illegal substance use, illegal activities, incomes and HIV related transmission risks were highly reduced, whereas employment rates and psychiatric problems improved. Retention was comparatively high among the patients in buprenorphine (84.8%) and in methadone maintenance treatment (85.0%) after six months of treatment.. These data show the successful implementation of OST in the Ukraine among drug users who were predominantly injectors of self-made opioid solutions. Continuing scale-up of OST in the Ukraine is therefore both feasible and highly recommended.

Topics: Adult; Behavior, Addictive; Buprenorphine; Employment; Feasibility Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk-Taking; Treatment Outcome; Ukraine

The control of blood-borne infections including HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) amongst injecting drug users (IDUs) is a challenge for health authorities in Iran. Hence, more reliable estimates of the levels of blood-borne infections and their associated factors are critically needed.. Active IDUs were recruited using peer-driven sampling in a bio-behavioural survey in 2008. Over 8 weeks, data were collected from adults living in a city in Isfahan Province who had injected drugs in the past month. Participants provided a whole blood sample and answered questions on sexual and drug-related risk characteristics. Participants were provided post-test counselling and a non-monetary incentive for their participation. Excluding two inactive cases, the initial recruits resulted in 2-8 waves of recruitment.. Overall, 118 IDUs including three females participated. The estimated population proportions of HIV, hepatitis B, and HCV infections were 0.7% (95% CI, 0.6-2.3), 0.7% (95% CI, 0.1-2.1), and 59.4% (95% CI, 47.4-68.7), respectively. Responses indicated that 31% (95% CI, 20-44.5) of the IDUs ever shared a needle/syringe for drug injection, and 77% (95% CI, 65-84) had ever injected an addictive solution marketed widely as Temgesic. Multivariate analyses revealed that the high prevalence of HCV infection amongst IDUs is associated with the lifetime duration of drug injection (AOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34) and with having injected Temgesic (AOR, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.52-14.69).. Our experience in Iran indicates that IDUs can be recruited effectively in a bio-behavioural survey through peer-driven sampling and using only a single primary incentive. The high prevalence of HCV associated with injecting Temgesic is important evidence for harm-reduction policies in Iran.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Data Collection; Female; Harm Reduction; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Iran; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Needle Sharing; Prevalence; Risk-Taking; Sexual Behavior; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Young Adult

Topics: Buprenorphine; Female; Harm Reduction; HIV Infections; Humans; Law Enforcement; Male; Methadone; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Police; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance; Risk-Taking; Treatment Outcome

This study was conducted to examine the pharmacokinetic interactions between buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV-seronegative subjects chronically maintained on BUP/NLX.. This study was an open labeled pharmacokinetic study in twelve HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of BUP/NLX therapy. Subjects sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of once-daily LPV/r (800/200 mg).. Compared to baseline values, BUP AUC0-24h (46.8 vs. 46.2 ng*hr/mL) and Cmax (6.54 vs. 5.88 ng/mL) did not differ significantly after achieving steady-state LPV/r. Similar analyses of norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated no significant difference in norBUP AUC0-24 hours (73.7 vs. 52.7 ng x h/mL); however, Cmax (5.29 vs. 3.11 ng/mL) levels were statistically different (P < 0.05) after LPV/r administration. Naloxone concentrations were similarly unchanged for AUC0-24 hours (0.421 vs. 0.374 ng x hr/mL) and Cmax (0.186 vs. 0.186 ng/mL). Using standardized measures, no objective opioid withdrawal was observed. The AUC0-24 hours and Cmin of LPV in this study did not significantly differ from historical controls (159.6 vs. 171.3 microg x hr/mL) and (2.3 vs. 1.3 microg/mL).. The addition of LPV/r to stabilized patients receiving BUP/NLX did not affect buprenorphine pharmacokinetics but did increase the clearance of norbuprenorphine. Pharmacodynamic responses indicate that the altered norbuprenorphine clearance did not lead to opioid withdrawal. Buprenorphine/naloxone and LPV/r can be safely coadministered without need for dosage modification.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between methadone and buprenorphine treatment and self-reported symptoms in HIV-infected opioid dependent individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).. Longitudinal study.. The French MANIF2000 cohort was used to compare self-reported symptoms in buprenorphine and methadone patients also receiving ART.. We selected individuals receiving ART and OAT (342 visits among 106 patients).. Symptoms were self-reported using a list of 14 symptoms (e.g. nausea, fatigue, fever) perceived during the previous 4 weeks, including three painful symptoms (abdominal or muscular pain, headaches). A two-step Heckman approach enabled us to account for the non-random assignment of OAT: a probit model identified predictors of starting either buprenorphine or methadone. A Poisson regression based on generalized estimating equations (GEE) was then used to identify predictors of the number of symptoms while adjusting for the non-random assignment of OAT.. The median (interquartile range) number of symptoms was 4 (1-6) and 2 (1-6) among buprenorphine and methadone patients, respectively. After adjustment for non-random assignment of OAT type, depressive and opioid withdrawal symptoms, anxiolytics consumption and daily cannabis use, methadone patients were more likely to report a lower number of symptoms than those receiving buprenorphine.. Methadone patients on ART report fewer symptoms than buprenorphine patients on ART under current treatment conditions in France. Further experimental research is still needed to identify an OAT-ART strategy which would minimize the burden of self-reported symptoms and potential interactions, while assuring sustainability and response to both treatments.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Attitude to Health; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Depression; Female; France; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medication Adherence; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pain; Self Report; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Treatment Outcome

Buprenorphine is an effective long-term opioid agonist treatment. As the only pharmacological treatment for opioid dependence readily available in office-based settings, buprenorphine may facilitate a historic shift in addiction treatment from treatment facilities to general medical practices. Although many patients have benefited from the availability of buprenorphine in the United States, almost half of current prescribers are addiction specialists suggesting that buprenorphine treatment has not yet fully penetrated general practice settings. We examined factors affecting willingness to offer buprenorphine treatment among physicians with different levels of prescribing experience. Based on their prescribing practices, physicians were classified as experienced, novice, or as a nonprescriber and asked to assess the extent to which a list of factors impacted their prescription of buprenorphine. Several factors affected willingness to prescribe buprenorphine for all physicians: staff training; access to counseling and alternate treatment; visit time; buprenorphine availability; and pain medications concerns. Compared with other physicians, experienced prescribers were less concerned about induction logistics and access to expert consultation, clinical guidelines, and mental health services. They were more concerned with reimbursement. These data provide important insight into physician concerns about buprenorphine and have implications for practice, education, and policy change that may effectively support widespread adoption of buprenorphine.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Drug Utilization; Female; Health Care Surveys; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Physicians; Prescriptions; Socioeconomic Factors; Specialization

The positive impact of opioid substitution treatment (OST) on opioid-dependent individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is well documented, especially with regard to adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We used the data from a 5-year longitudinal study of the MANIF 2000 cohort of individuals infected with HIV (as a result of injection drug use) and receiving HAART to investigate the predictors of long-term virological success. Design. Data were collected every 6 months from outpatient hospital services delivering HIV care in France. We selected all patients who were receiving HAART for at least 6 months (baseline visit) and who had indications for OST (ie, still dependent on opioids). We selected a total of 113 patients, accounting for a total of 562 visits for all the analyses.. Long-term virological success was defined as an undetectable viral load after at least 6 months on HAART. Retention in OST was defined as the time interval between the last initiation or reinitiation of OST during HAART follow-up and any given visit on OST. A mixed logistic model was used to identify predictors of long-term virological success.. At baseline, 53 patients were receiving buprenorphine, 28 patients were receiving methadone, and 32 patients were not on OST. The median duration of OST was 25 months (range, 3-42 months). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for significant predictors of long-term virological success such as adherence to HAART and early virological response, retention in OST was associated with long-term virological success (odds ratio, 1.20 per 6-month increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32).. Our study presents important evidence of the positive impact of retention in OST on HIV outcomes. Increasing access to OST based on a comprehensive model of care for HIV-infected patients who have indications for OST may foster adherence and ensure long-term response to HAART.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Narcotics; Patient Compliance; Treatment Outcome

Assessing social risks has proven difficult for IRBs. We undertook a novel effort to empirically investigate social risks before an HIV prevention trial among drug users in Thailand and China. The assessment investigated whether law, policies and enforcement strategies would place research subjects at significantly elevated risk of arrest, incarceration, physical harm, breach of confidentiality, or loss of access to health care relative to drug users not participating in the research. The study validated the investigator's concern that drug users were subject to serious social risks in the site localities, but also suggested that participation in research posed little or no marginal increase in risk and might even have a protective effect. Our experience shows that it is feasible to inform IRB deliberations with actual data on social risks, but also raises the question of whether and when such research is an appropriate use of scare research resources.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; China; Confidentiality; Conflict of Interest; Counseling; Ethics Committees, Research; Ethics, Research; Female; Financing, Government; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; Human Rights; Humans; Informed Consent; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Research Subjects; Risk Assessment; Risk Reduction Behavior; Social Environment; Thailand; United States; Vulnerable Populations

Diversion of buprenorphine has been described in settings where it is legally prescribed and has become an increasing concern in Malaysia; it resulted in banning of buprenorphine in Singapore where unsubstantiated case reports suggested that buprenorphine injection was associated with particularly poor outcomes. We therefore conducted a case series of qualitative interviews with buprenorphine injectors in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to examine further the issues surrounding buprenorphine injection as well as the abuse of midazolam in combination with buprenorphine. Interviews with 19 men do not suggest significant adverse health consequences from buprenorphine injection alone and injectors have adapted diverted buprenorphine as a treatment modality. A subset of these injectors, however, combined buprenorphine and midazolam for euphoric effects with resultant symptoms of a possible pharmacological interaction. Prospective cohort studies, rather than hospital-derived samples, are needed to better understand the safety of buprenorphine injection.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Catchment Area, Health; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Injections, Intravenous; Malaysia; Male; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Opioid substitution treatment has been studied extensively in industrialized countries, but there are relatively few studies in developing/transitional countries. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of opioid substitution treatment (OST) in less resourced countries.. Longitudinal cohort study.. Purposively selected OST sites in Asia (China, Indonesia, Thailand), Eastern Europe (Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine), the Middle East (Iran) and Australia.. Seven hundred and twenty-six OST entrants.. Participants were interviewed at treatment entry, 3 and 6 months. Standardized instruments assessed drug use, treatment history, physical and psychological health, quality of life, criminal involvement, blood-borne virus (BBV) risk behaviours and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C.. Participants were predominantly male, aged in their early 30s and had attained similar levels of education. Seroprevalence rates for HIV were highest in Thailand (52%), followed by Indonesia (28%) and Iran (26%), and lowest in Australia (2.6%). Treatment retention at 6 months was uniformly high, averaging approximately 70%. All countries demonstrated significant and marked reductions in reported heroin and other illicit opioid use; HIV (and other BBV) exposure risk behaviours associated with injection drug users (IDU) and criminal activity, and demonstrated substantial improvement in their physical and mental health and general wellbeing over the course of the study.. OST can achieve similar outcomes consistently in a culturally diverse range of settings in low- and middle-income countries to those reported widely in high-income countries. It is associated with a substantial reduction in HIV exposure risk associated with IDU across nearly all the countries. Results support the expansion of opioid substitution treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Buprenorphine; Developing Countries; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

To date, no data exist assessing the impact of either methadone or buprenorphine on adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the long term. This study was conducted in order to evaluate whether receiving take-home methadone and buprenorphine may ensure better adherence to HAART in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through injection drug use (IDU).. Longitudinal data on adherence, opioid substitution treatment (OST) and patient behaviours starting from their first HAART prescription were collected for 276 individuals HIV-infected through drug use (n=1558 visits).. Out-patient hospital services delivering HIV care in Marseilles, Avignon, Nice and Ile de France.. At any given visit, patients were classified both according to the type of OST received and ongoing injection. Patients who reported no injection and no OST over the whole study period were considered as 'abstinent' and used as a reference category. A logit model based on generalized estimation equations (GEE) was used to identify predictors of non-adherence.. After adjustment for alcohol consumption, depression and self-reported side effects, patients ceasing injection during OST and abstinent patients exhibited comparable adherence. Patients reporting injection, on OST or not, had a twofold and threefold risk, respectively, of non-adherence compared with abstinent patients (P<0.01 linear trend). Duration on OST without injecting was associated significantly with virological success.. Both access to and effectiveness of OST contribute to sustaining adherence to HAART in HIV-infected IDUs. These results advocate strongly the need of wider use of OST in countries scaling-up HAART where HIV is driven by IDUs.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Epidemiologic Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Compliance

The availability of buprenorphine (BUP) provides an alternative approach to the treatment of opioid addiction with methadone, an agent that has many drug-drug interactions when combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, due to limited long-term pharmacokinetic studies in HIV-infected patients, the clinical use of BUP, a CYP450-3A4 substrate, will require that studies be conducted to examine safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics when these drugs are taken for chronic treatment. One clinical approach could include plasma concentration monitoring to avoid under- or overdosing BUP secondary to drug interactions with ART. The measurement of BUP and its active metabolite, norbuprenorphine (NBUP) facilitates the addition of BUP to ART in an attempt to avoid drug toxicity as described in a recent report by Bruce et al. Therefore, our objective was to validate a BUP assay and integrate its application into an ongoing antiretroviral (ARV) plasma concentration monitoring program. A chromatographic method for monitoring BUP and its active metabolite, NBUP was investigated. An assay was developed that would facilitate BUP and ARV measurement from a single 3 mL blood sample (0.75 mL plasma required) in conjunction with a previously validated multiple ARV HPLC method. The method measures BUP and NBUP over the range from 0.25 to 50 ng/mL with mass spectrometry detection. Inter- and intra-assay variation was

Topics: Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Biological Assay; Buprenorphine; Calibration; Chromatography, Liquid; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mass Spectrometry; Molecular Structure; Narcotic Antagonists; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Substance-Related Disorders; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Hospitals; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Prisoners; Prisons; Program Evaluation; Rhode Island; Risk Factors; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Illicit drug use is common among HIV-infected individuals. Buprenorphine enables physicians to simultaneously treat HIV and opioid dependence, offering opportunities to improve health outcomes. Despite this, few physicians prescribe buprenorphine.. To examine barriers to obtaining waivers to prescribe buprenorphine.. Cross-sectional survey study.. 375 physicians attending HIV educational conferences in six cities in 2006.. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed and analyzed to test whether confidence addressing drug problems and perceived barriers to prescribing buprenorphine were associated with having a buprenorphine waiver, using chi-square, t tests, and logistic regression.. 25.1% of HIV physicians had waivers to prescribe buprenorphine. In bivariate analyses, physicians with waivers versus those without waivers were less likely to be male (51.1 vs 63.7%, p < .05), more likely to be in New York (51.1 vs 29.5%, p < .01), less likely to be infectious disease specialists (25.5 vs 41.6%, p < .05), and more likely to be general internists (43.6 vs 33.5%, p < .05). Adjusting for physician characteristics, confidence addressing drug problems (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.05, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.08-3.88) and concern about lack of access to addiction experts (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.32-0.97) were significantly associated with having a buprenorphine waiver.. Among HIV physicians attending educational conferences, confidence addressing drug problems was positively associated with having a buprenorphine waiver, and concern about lack of access to addiction experts was negatively associated with it. HIV physicians are uniquely positioned to provide opioid addiction treatment in the HIV primary care setting. Understanding and remediating barriers HIV physicians face may lead to new opportunities to improve outcomes for opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug and Narcotic Control; Drug Prescriptions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opioid-Related Disorders

Opioid addiction and HIV disease frequently co-occur. Adverse drug interactions have been reported between methadone and some HIV medications, but less is known about interactions between buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist used to treat opioid dependence, and HIV therapeutics. This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine and the protease inhibitors atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir. Opioid-dependent, buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained, HIV-negative volunteers (n=10 per protease inhibitor) participated in two 24-h sessions to determine pharmacokinetics of (1) buprenorphine and (2) buprenorphine and atazanavir (400mg daily) or atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100mg daily) following administration for 5 days. Objective opiate withdrawal scale scores and mini-mental state examination were determined prior to and following antiretroviral administration to examine pharmacodynamic effects. Pharmacokinetics of atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir were compared in subjects and matched, healthy controls (n=10 per protease inhibitor) to determine effects of buprenorphine. With atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir, respectively concentrations of buprenorphine (p<0.001, p<0.001), norbuprenorphine (p=0.026, p=0.006), buprenorphine glucuronide (p=0.002, p<0.001), and norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NS, p=0.037) increased. Buprenorphine treatment did not significantly alter atazanavir or ritonavir concentrations. Three buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained participants reported increased sedation with atazanavir/ritonavir. Atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir may increase buprenorphine and buprenorphine metabolite concentrations and might require a decreased buprenorphine dose.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Atazanavir Sulfate; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Substance-Related Disorders

Injection drug use (IDU) accounts for 70 percent of HIV cases in Ukraine. Until buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) was introduced, few effective strategies aimed at achieving reduction in illicit drug use were available as a conduit to anti-retroviral therapy (ARV) among IDUs.. In October 2005, BMT was scaled-up using Global Fund resources in six regions within Ukraine. Entry criteria included opioid dependence, HIV-1 seropositivity, age >or=18 years and reported interest in BMT. All sites included a multidisciplinary team. To date, 207 patients have been initiated on BMT.. The existing infrastructure allows for further scale-up of and administration of BMT and the possibility of co-administration with ARV. The process for prescription and administration of buprenorphine and ARV is at times cumbersome and constrained by current regulations.. More IDU need BMT to improve overall health outcomes. Central to expanding access will be legislative changes to existing drug policy. Moreover, the cost of buprenorphine is prohibitively expensive. Sustainable substitution therapy in Ukraine requires lower negotiated prices for buprenorphine, the addition of methadone, or both to the existing formulary for HIV+ drug users.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; Health Services Accessibility; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle-Exchange Programs; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pilot Projects; Policy Making; Program Development; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Ukraine

Opiate dependence among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients has been associated with negative clinical outcomes, yet few affected patients receive appropriate and coordinated treatment for both conditions. The introduction of buprenorphine maintenance therapy into HIV care settings provides an opportunity for providers to integrate treatment for opiate dependence into their practices. Buprenorphine maintenance therapy has been associated with reductions in opiate use, increased social stability, improved adherence to antiretroviral therapy, and lowered rates of injection drug use. We describe the following 4 models for the integration of buprenorphine maintenance therapy into HIV care: (1) a primary care model, in which the highly active antiretroviral therapy-administering clinician also prescribes buprenorphine; (2) a model that relies on an on-site specialist in addiction medicine or psychiatry to prescribe the buprenorphine; (3) a hybrid model, in which an on-site specialist provides the induction (with or without stabilization phases) and the HIV care provider provides the maintenance phase; and (4) a drug treatment model that provides buprenorphine maintenance therapy services with HIV services in the substance abuse clinic setting. The key barriers against effective integration of buprenorphine maintenance therapy and primary HIV services are discussed, and we suggest several mechanisms to overcome such obstacles.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Narcotics; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir

Malaysia is experiencing severe problems with heroin dependence and HIV infection. This, study evaluated drug use and other HIV risk behaviors and their association with HIV and other infectious diseases in heroin-dependent subjects enrolled in a clinical trial of drug abuse treatment in Muar, Malaysia.. Baseline assessment of treatment-seeking subjects (n=177) included the Addiction Severity Index; AIDS Risk Inventory; serological tests for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C; and chest X-ray.. All of the subjects were male; 67.8% were Malays, 28.8% Chinese, and 2.3%. Indian. Subjects had a mean (SD) age of 37.2 (9.1) years and 14.4 (8.5) years of using heroin; 76.3% reported lifetime injection drug use (IDU), and 41.5% reported current IDU; 30 of 156 (19.2%) tested HIV positive, 143 of 159 (89.9%) tested hepatitis C positive, and 25 of 159 (15.7%) had radiological evidence of pulmonary tuberbulosis. Malay subjects had a significantly higher prevalence of current IDU, needle sharing (p<0.01), and HIV infection (p<0.05) compared with Chinese subjects. Lifetime IDU, needle sharing, lack of consistent condom use, and Malay ethnicity were significantly associated with HIV infection.. The high prevalence of HIV infection among heroin-dependent individuals, in Malaysia supports the important of interventions to reduce the major risk factors for HIV, including IDU, needle sharing, and unprotected sex.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Demography; Female; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; Malaysia; Male; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Prevalence; Risk-Taking

Until recently, Malaysia has lagged behind in the treatment of drug addiction and related disorders, despite experiencing severe drug problems. By the end of 2004, 234,000 heroin users or heroin-dependent individuals had been registered in the official government registry, but other estimates exceed 500,000 for heroin abusers in the country. Amphetamine-type stimulant abuse is also increasing and of considerable public and government concern. Among the population of drug users, HIV and other infectious diseases rates are very high. In the Western Pacific regions, Malaysia has the second highest HIV prevalence (after Vietnam) among adult populations (0.62%) and the highest proportion of HIV cases resulting from injection drug use (76.3%). Drug use and related disorders exert a heavy burden on the country's health care and legal systems. Historically, drug abusers were rehabilitated involuntarily in correctional, rather than health-care, facilities. This primarily criminal treatment approach had limited effectiveness which led to widespread public dissatisfaction and the recent introduction of medical treatments for addiction. Naltrexone was introduced in 1999; buprenorphine was introduced in 2001 and methadone in 2003. Agonist maintenance programmes were embraced rapidly by the medical community in Malaysia. Currently, over 30,000 opiate-dependent patients are treated with agonist maintenance treatments by more than 500 medical practitioners in Malaysia. Despite these recent advances, treatments for amphetamine-type stimulant abuse or dependence are underdeveloped, and diversion of agonist medications is an emerging concern.

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Malaysia; Mental Health Services; Naltrexone; Narcotics; Prevalence; Registries; Risk Factors; Risk-Taking; Substance-Related Disorders

To assess factors associated with higher levels of health-related quality-of-life among HIV-HCV co-infected injecting drug users and more specifically, to explore the role of injecting drug status and drug maintenance treatment on health-related quality-of-life.. The two hundred and forty participants were patients enrolled in the MANIF cohort of HIV-HCV patients infected through injecting drug use who completed a self-administered questionnaire that included a health-related quality-of-life evaluation at the 42 month follow-up. A self-administered questionnaire collected information about socio-demographic characteristics, health-related quality-of-life (as measured by SF-12), injecting drug status and drug maintenance treatment, depressive symptoms, self-reported symptoms related to HIV treatment; clinical characteristics were obtained from medical records.. Higher levels of both mental and physical health-related quality-of-life were found in patients with no depressive symptoms, abstinent from drugs and experiencing few drug related problems. Patients on drug maintenance treatment who stopped injecting drugs had better mental health-related quality-of-life than injectors but lower levels of mental health-related quality-of-life than abstinent patients. Mental health-related quality-of-life was also independently higher in patients receiving high social support. Physical health-related quality-of-life was independently higher for patients who stopped injection, whether on drug maintenance treatment or not, for patients on anti-retroviral treatment and for patients who remained in clinical stage A.. Drug maintenance treatment seems to be associated with higher health-related quality-of-life among patients HIV-HCV co-infected by drug use, but it is still necessary to help patients cope with the mental impact of drug cessation. These results underline the need to provide regular psychological support and counselling for HIV-HCV co-infected injecting drug users during the medical follow-up for HIV-disease.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Counseling; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Depression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Quality of Life; Social Support; Socioeconomic Factors; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors

This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist medication used in the treatment of opioid dependence, and the nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) efavirenz (EFV) and delavirdine (DLV). Opioid-dependent, buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative volunteers (n=10 per NNRTI) participated in 24-h sessions to determine pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and of buprenorphine with either EFV or DLV after administration of standard doses of either antiretroviral for 15 or 7 days, respectively. Opiate withdrawal symptoms, cognitive effects, and adverse events were determined before and after antiretroviral administration in opioid-dependent participants. The pharmacokinetics of NNRTIs in healthy control participants were used to determine the effect of buprenorphine on NNRTIs. EFV decreased the buprenorphine area under the concentration-time curve (P<.001). DLV increased buprenorphine concentrations (P<.001). Clinically significant consequences of these interactions were not observed. Buprenorphine did not alter antiretroviral pharmacokinetics. Adjustments of doses of either buprenorphine or EFV or DLV are not likely to be necessary when these drugs are administered for the treatment of opiate dependence and HIV disease.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; Buprenorphine; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Delavirdine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxazines; Probability; Prognosis; Reference Values; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome

On 3-4 June 2004, in Washington, DC, the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research convened experts from academia, community and private practices, US government agencies, and industry to develop recommendations for increased uptake of buprenorphine integrated into human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) primary care, with special emphasis on Ryan White CARE Act-funded programs. Workshop participants evaluated knowledge gaps requiring research; barriers to integration at the patient, clinic, and systems level; policy and financing issues; and program impacts. Recommendations were developed for training, including medical school and post-medical school training of clinical teams as well as training of patients; for improving programs and services, including integration of opioid dependence and HIV infection into chronic disease models, providing flexible access to core and support services, and monitoring and evaluation of programs; for changes in policy supportive of program and services goals; for financing buprenorphine treatment by use of existing models of integrated treatment and merging funding streams at the local level; and for addressing research gaps, including cost-effectiveness research.

Topics: Buprenorphine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; Education; Female; Financing, Government; Health Care Costs; Health Services Research; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Needs Assessment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Quality of Health Care; Research Support as Topic; United States

Few HIV physicians are trained to provide buprenorphine treatment. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess the impact of an eight-hour course on the treatment of opioid dependence on HIV physicians' preparedness to prescribe buprenorphine. 113 of 257 trained physicians (44%) provided HIV care. Post-course, the majority of both HIV physicians and non-HIV physicians (66% vs. 67%, P = .8) planned to pursue a registration to prescribe buprenorphine. The most common reason for not planning to do so was lack of experience (9% vs. 15%, P = .19). 52 of the 113 (46%) HIV physicians had concerns about prescribing buprenorphine. 30 of the 52 (58%) indicated that interactions between buprenorphine and HAART was their primary concern. Following training, most physicians feel prepared and plan to obtain a registration to prescribe buprenorphine. HIV physicians' concerns regarding interactions between buprenorphine and HAART need to be addressed in future training efforts.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Buprenorphine; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Curriculum; Drug Interactions; Drug Prescriptions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inservice Training; Male; Middle Aged; Narcotics; New York; Opioid-Related Disorders; Specialization

Topics: Buprenorphine; Health Services Accessibility; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Methadone; Narcotics; Patient Education as Topic; Peer Group; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Buprenorphine; Diffusion of Innovation; HIV Infections; Humans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders

The revelation of an acceptable rate of users still treated one year after initiation of a substitution program with high-dose buprenorphine (HDB) has contributed in the validation of the interest of the molecule in this indication. However the frequency of early drop-outs (after the first consultation), when treatment is set-up, is frequently evoked, although undocumented, by general practitioners.. During analysis of a survey on the follow-up of opiate addicts starting substitution therapy with HDB, we attempted to assess the frequency of early drop-outs and identify the contributing factors.. Among the 1085 patients included in the study and in whom induction therapy had been prescribed, 656 were assessed after 12 months' follow-up.. Age, precariousness, lack of social support and partial access to care (lack of health insurance, previous contact with the prescriber) were significantly associated with early drop-out. The consumption of psychoactive products and their administration mode, during the 30 days prior to the first consultation of those loss to follow-up, also differed from those of patients who remained within the care system.. Knowledge of the factors related to frequent early drop-out during induction of HDB substitution therapy, and bearing this in mind, would permit the organisation of more attentive management and hence reduce the drop-out rate.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Attitude to Health; Buprenorphine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Family Practice; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Health Services Accessibility; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Marital Status; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Patient Dropouts; Psychotropic Drugs; Risk Factors; Social Support

Present the evolution in the characteristics of drug addicts treated in the Addictions-Sud centre (Marseille) between 1996 and 2001, and compare the profile of patients according to the substitution therapy prescribed.. Descriptive analysis of the data collected from the inclusion questionnaire of patients seen during a hospital consultation in the centre and registered in a substitution program (n = 585 patients).. In our active file, the use of heroin and injections has decreased since 1996, whereas the consumption of cocaine and above all amphetamines and LSD has greatly increased. When treated, 60% of the patients were administered methadone and 40% BHD. (The patients included in the methadone program (n = 348) were considerably older and frequently HIV or hepatitis C-infected than those treated with BHD (n = 229)). The proportion of patients who had previously undertaken withdrawal or substitution measures, and who continued to inject drugs, was greater in the group of patients in the methadone program. The presence of depression, psychotic disorders and anxiety was noted respectively in 46, 30 and 24% of the patients treated.. Today, it is crucial that information on the treatment of drug addicts should be reinforced, so as to measure the progression of the problems encountered, specify the indications of the two substitution products currently prescribed and understand the impact they have on the psychiatric disorders and viral pathologies frequently noted in drug addicts.

Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Drug Overdose; Female; France; Hallucinogens; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Hospitals, University; Humans; Lysergic Acid Diethylamide; Male; Mental Disorders; Methadone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Public Assistance; Substance-Related Disorders; Suicide, Attempted; Surveys and Questionnaires

Sublingual buprenorphine is used as a substitution drug in heroin addicts. Although buprenorphine inhibits mitochondrial function at high concentrations in experimental animals, these effects should not occur after therapeutic sublingual doses, which give very low plasma concentrations.. We report four cases of former heroin addicts infected with hepatitis C virus and placed on substitution therapy with buprenorphine. These patients exhibited a marked increase in serum alanine amino transferase (30-, 37-, 13- and 50-times the upper limit of normal, respectively) after injecting buprenorphine intravenously and three of them also became jaundiced. Interruption of buprenorphine injections was associated with prompt recovery, even though two of these patients continued buprenorphine by the sublingual route. A fifth patient carrying the hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency viruses, developed jaundice and asterixis with panlobular liver necrosis and microvesicular steatosis after using sublingual buprenorphine and small doses of paracetamol and aspirin.. Although buprenorphine hepatitis is most uncommon even after intravenous misuse, addicts placed on buprenorphine substitution should be repeatedly warned not to use it intravenously. Higher drug concentrations could trigger hepatitis in a few intravenous users, possibly those whose mitochondrial function is already impaired by viral infections and other factors.

Topics: Administration, Sublingual; Adult; Animals; Buprenorphine; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Hepatitis C; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Narcotics

Topics: Buprenorphine; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Needle-Exchange Programs; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Injection drug users are frequently infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and receive opioid dependence pharmacotherapies and zidovudine (ZDV), the latter as a component of highly active antiretroviral therapy. We previously reported that methadone substantially increases ZDV concentrations. We now report on oral ZDV pharmacokinetics in 52 subjects receiving the opioid dependence pharmacotherapies l-alpha-acetylmethadol LAAM, buprenorphine, or naltrexone, and 17 non-opioid-treated controls. Relative to the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) of ZDV in control subjects, no statistically significant differences in ZDV AUC were observed in participants treated with LAAM (p = .75), buprenorphine (p = .37), or naltrexone (p = .34). While methadone maintenance may result in ZDV toxicity and possibly require dose adjustments, other opioid pharmacotherapies should not produce ZDV toxicity.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadyl Acetate; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Opioid-Related Disorders; Radioimmunoassay; Substance Abuse Detection; Time Factors; Zidovudine

Some HIV-infected injecting drug users (IDUs) on drug abuse maintenance treatment have access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); this raises questions about the effects of individual treatments on the efficacy of HAART. The French Cohort Study of HIV-infected IDUs - MANIF-2000 - allowed one to assess whether buprenorphine differentially impacts efficacy of HAART. Of the 103 HAART-treated patients, (excluding active IDUs and patients on methadone), 20 were on buprenorphine substitution treatment and 83 were ex-IDUs. A linear regression model used the differences in viral load titre before and after treatment initiation, as a dependent variable, and showed that buprenorphine treatment was not significantly associated with viral load trend. This was also the case when adjusting for other potential confounders, and suggests that there is no major short-term influence of buprenorphine on HIV viral load in HAART-treated patients.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Cohort Studies; Female; France; HIV Infections; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Narcotics; Statistics, Nonparametric; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Viral Load

Considering the importance to public health and the frequency with which drug addicts are imprisoned, we studied the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as drug addiction of patients admitted to the Elsau prison in Strasbourg (France).. The prospective study included all entering inmates from 1 September to 31 October 1997 (270 persons) to whom HIV, HBV and HCV blood tests were offered as well as a questionnaire on their drug addiction.. Thirty-six percent of the entering inmates were drug addicts, of whom 1% were HIV positive, 11.2% HBV positive and 30% HCV positive, compared to, respectively, 0.6, 9.9 and 6.4% for non-drug addicts. Ninety-five of the 98 patients used several drugs, including buprenorphine for 53 patients. At the beginning of this study, buprenorphine had been available in France for 9 months.. The results are to be taken seriously regarding the misuse of this product in this selected population (intravenous use, multiple drug use, dealing).

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; France; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Narcotics; Prisoners; Prospective Studies; Seroepidemiologic Studies; Substance-Related Disorders

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Arsenic Trioxide; Arsenicals; Buprenorphine; Child; Drug and Narcotic Control; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Investigational; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute; Lopinavir; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxides; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, Opioid; Ritonavir; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Drug maintenance treatment (DMT) has only been recently introduced in France (methadone programmes in March 1995, buprenorphine prescriptions in ambulatory medicine in February 1996) in relation to risk reduction policies for HIV infection among intravenous drug users (IDUs). Impact of DMT was assessed in the period of inclusion (October 1995-December 1997) of a French cohort of patients HIV infected through intravenous drug use the MANIF 2000 study). Among the 429 patients, 48.2% were ex-IDUs, 20.3% were active users not in DMT and 31.5% were in DMT. A majority (73.3%) of patients in DMT had persisted in their injection behaviours and their social and psychological characteristics were similar to those of active users not in DMT. Among the 186 active IDUs, those in DMT were more likely to have injected cocaine (42.4%) and buprenorphine or methadone (21.3%) than those who were not (respectively 27.6% and 2.4%), and 23.6% declared direct needle-sharing behaviours during the prior six months. Among younger IDUs (< or = 33 years of age) (n = 100), needle-sharing was associated with polydrug use and cocaine injection but was not significantly reduced by participation in DMT. These results suggest the need for taking into account differences between type of HIV-infected drug users and developing appropriate multidrug maintenance treatment programmes, which may imply adaptations of current dosages of methadone and buprenorphine.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Female; France; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methadone; Narcotics; Needle Sharing; Risk-Taking; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Buprenorphine; France; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methadone; Morphine; Paris; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Buprenorphine; Emergencies; Heroin Dependence; HIV Infections; Hospitalization; Humans; Methadone; Morphine; Outpatients; Patient Care Team; Substance-Related Disorders

Topics: Buprenorphine; HIV Infections; Humans; Risk Factors; Sexual Behavior; Substance-Related Disorders