budesonide--formoterol-fumarate-drug-combination and Pulmonary-Disease--Chronic-Obstructive

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory diseases that remain uncontrolled in many patients, despite the wide range of therapeutic options available. This review analyzes the available clinical evidence on 3 budesonide/formoterol DPI devices, Spiromax. The effectiveness of dry powder inhalers (DPI) depends largely on the device and the patient's inhaler technique. Equally important are the patient's perception of the inhaler and adherence. Given the high burden of these diseases, it is important that efforts be made to select the best DPI for each patient and to analyze the impact of these variables to help improve the health and quality of life of our patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the present knowledge about PROs, inhaler handling errors, and asthma and COPD control achieved by Spiromax

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life

The claimed functional basis for ICSs in asthma and COPD is airway selectivity, attained by inhaling a potent, lipophilic compound with long local dissolution/absorption time. The development has been empirically based, resulting in five widely used ICSs. Among them, budesonide (BUD) deviates by being less lipophilic, leading to a more rapid systemic uptake with plasma peaks with some systemic anti-inflammatory activity. By this, BUD fits less well into the current pharmacological dogma of optimal ICS profile. In this review we compared the physicochemical, pharmacological and clinical properties of BUD, fluticasone propionate (FP) and fluticasone furoate (FF), representing different levels of lipophilicity, airway and systemic kinetics, focusing on their long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations, in line with current GINA and GOLD recommendations. We are aware of the differences between formoterol (FORM) and the not rapid acting LABAs such as e.g. salmeterol and vilanterol but our comparisons are based on currently available combination products. A beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/FORM combination is also commented upon. Based on clinical comparisons in asthma and COPD, we conclude that the BUD/formoterol (BUD/FORM) combination is as effective and safe as the FP and FF combinations, and is in some cases even better as it can be used as "maintenance plus reliever therapy" (MART) in asthma and as maintenance in COPD. This is difficult to explain by current views of required ICS's/LABAs pharmacokinetic profiles. We propose that BUD achieves its efficacy by a combination of airway and systemic activity. The airway activity is dominating. The systemic activity contributes by plasma peaks, which are high enough for supportive anti-inflammatory actions at the blood and bone marrow levels but not sufficiently long to trigger a similar level of systemic adverse effects. This may be due to BUD's capacity to exploit a systemic differentiation mechanism as programmed for cortisol's various actions. This differentiation prospect can be reached only for an ICS with short plasma half-life. Here we present an alternative mode for an ICS to reach combined efficacy and safety, based on a poorly investigated and exploited physiological mechanism. A preference of this mode is broader versatility, due to that its straighter dose-response should allow a better adaptation to disease fluctuations, and that its rapid activity enables use as "anti-inflammatory reliever".

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Dry Powder Inhalers; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

BACKGROUND The 2018 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease publication suggested that the combination of bronchodilator therapy of inhaled glucocorticoid/long-acting β₂ adrenoceptor agonist is more effective in improving pulmonary function and health status in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations than the individual components; however, it is not known whether this also the case for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol in the maintenance and relief therapy of patients with stable COPD. MATERIAL AND METHODS An electronic search of the literature in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was undertaken to identify published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ≥12 weeks duration comparing the budesonide/formoterol, with budesonide, formoterol, or placebo in the treatment of patients with stable COPD. The identified RCTs were reviewed. The mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the results. RESULTS Seven high quality studies with RCTs met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Compared with budesonide alone, the combination therapy of budesonide/formoterol showed significant improvement in the following spirometric indices: pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.34; P=0.000). In addition, versus formoterol alone, budesonide/formoterol was associated with a significant increase in pre-dose FEV₁ (SMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.17; P=0.000). A similar pattern was also evident in the comparison to placebo, where budesonide/formoterol yielded greater increase in pre-dose FEV₁ (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.30; P=0.000). Moreover, compared with other controls, the combination of budesonide-formoterol significantly improved morning peak expiratory flow and evening peak expiratory flow, significantly reduced the total score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS For stable COPD patients, compared with controls (monocomponents or placebo), budesonide/formoterol improved pulmonary function and health status. Future larger long-term RCTs are warranted to assess the beneficial clinical efficacy of budesonide/formoterol in COPD patients.

Topics: Aged; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Function Tests

The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative risks of budesonide/formoterol, versus placebo or monotherapies, for the treatment of patients with stable COPD.. We undertook a systematic search of the literature in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing budesonide/formoterol with control regimens for the treatment of patients with stable COPD and at least 12 weeks of follow-up, meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies were reviewed, and OR with corresponding 95% CI was used to pool the results.. A total of eight studies involving 9,254 patients met the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, combination therapy with budesonide/formoterol was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse effects including oral candidiasis (OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 1.95-4.91) and dysphonia (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.40-5.44), but not pneumonia (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.64-1.37) or bronchitis (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.95-1.95). A similar pattern was also evident for the comparison of formoterol with budesonide/formoterol, with increased occurrence of oral candidiasis (OR: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.33-5.58) and dysphonia (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.95-8.76); however, there were no significant differences in pneumonia (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.98-1.74) or bronchitis (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83-1.31). In contrast, compared with budesonide, combined budesonide/formoterol was associated with similar risks of adverse effects, including pneumonia (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.60-2.39), bronchitis (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.41-2.20), oral candidiasis (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.41-1.53), and dysphonia (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.40-2.47).. Combination therapy does not cause more adverse events, including pneumonia and bronchitis, than control (placebo, formoterol, or budesonide) treatment in patients with stable COPD, while there were higher risks of oral candidiasis and dysphonia compared with the non-inhaled corticosteroid group (placebo, formoterol).

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

In the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchodilators such as long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long acting β agonist(LABA) play key roles for improving respiratory function and symptoms, and reducing risk of exacerbation. However, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a key medicine for bronchial asthma, is limitedly used in COPD treatment. Japanese Respiratory Society recommends to use ICS for severe COPD patients who have been frequently exacerbated, because previous clinical studies indicated that ICS reduces exacerbation in moderate to severe COPD patients. Asthma sometimes overlaps with COPD, and symptoms of those patients are not well controlled by the bronchodilation therapy alone. Therefore, ICS/LABA or ICS/LAMA should be prescribed to those overlapped patients. Concentration of exhaled nitrogen oxide and percentage of peripheral eosinophil may be good biomarkers for discriminating the COPD patients who have good response to ICS treatment.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Asthma; Biomarkers; Breath Tests; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eosinophils; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nitrogen Oxides; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide

Fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) 100/25 mcg is a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA) treatment approved in the United States, Canada and Europe for the long-term maintenance therapy of COPD. We report data from mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) of once-daily FF/VI against established twice-daily ICS/LABA combination therapies on clinical efficacy outcomes.. Data from 33 parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ICS/LABAs, of ≥8 weeks' duration in patients ≥12 years of age with COPD, identified by systematic review, were analysed using covariate-adjusted Bayesian hierarchical models for three efficacy outcomes. Lung function, assessed by change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), was the outcome of primary interest (n = 28 studies). Secondary objectives were assessment of annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations (n = 15) and patient-reported health status, measured by change from baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total score (n = 20). Overall, 25 different treatments were included in the MTC; we report findings, including probabilities of non-inferiority, for comparisons of once-daily FF/VI 100/25 mcg with twice-daily fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) 500/50 mcg and budesonide (BUD)/formoterol (FORM) 400/12 mcg.. For FEV1, FF/VI 100/25 mcg demonstrated >99% probability of non-inferiority to FP/SAL 500/50 mcg and BUD/FORM 400/12 mcg using a 50 mL margin. For annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, FF/VI 100/25 mcg demonstrated 73% and 77% probability of non-inferiority to FP/SAL 500/50 mcg and BUD/FORM 400/12 mcg, respectively, using a 10% rate ratio margin. For SGRQ Total score, the corresponding probabilities of non-inferiority were 99% and 98%, respectively, on a 2-unit margin. Significant covariate effects were identified: increased age was associated with deterioration in FEV1 and reduced exacerbation frequency; shorter study duration was associated with reduced exacerbation frequency.. FF/VI 100/25 mcg was comparable with corresponding doses of FP/SAL and BUD/FORM on lung function and health status outcomes. Non-inferiority on moderate/severe exacerbation rate was not demonstrated to the same degree of confidence, though observed rates were similar. Model limitations include a weak treatment network for the exacerbation analysis and variability across the included studies. Our data support previous RCT findings suggesting that the efficacy of FF/VI 100/25 mcg on lung function and health status in COPD is comparable with twice-daily ICS/LABAs.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Androstadienes; Bayes Theorem; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Chlorobenzenes; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly heterogeneous, progressive inflammatory disease that imposes considerable economic and healthcare burdens on society, with the disease predicted to remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in the future. Current pharmacological treatment can improve symptoms of the disease, but not progression. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend that patients with moderate COPD should use one or more long-acting bronchodilators (e.g. a long-acting β(2)-agonist) as required and, for those with severe and very severe disease who are experiencing repeated COPD exacerbations, an inhaled corticosteroid should be added as required. Budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® (Symbicort® Turbuhaler®) is a dry powder inhaler (DPI) that combines these two classes of drugs in a single inhaler, thereby making administration easier and more convenient. Budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® (delivered dose 320 μg/9 μg) is recommended for the symptomatic treatment of adult patients with severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50% of predicted value) and a history of repeated exacerbations, who have significant symptoms despite regular therapy with long-acting bronchodilators. This article reviews the pharmacological properties and clinical use of budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® in adult patients with moderate to severe COPD. Budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® (320 μg/9 μg twice daily) was effective and well tolerated in adult patients with moderate to severe COPD participating in large, multicentre trials of up to 12 months' duration. Budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® improved lung function, exacerbation rates, COPD symptom scores and health status from baseline to a significantly greater extent than placebo and, in general, than the individual monotherapies in these trials. Moreover, as reflected in the faster onset of action of formoterol than salmeterol, budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® was more effective than salmeterol/fluticasone propionate DPI at improving the patient's ability to perform morning activities in a short-term study. In the 12-week CLIMB trial, adding budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® to inhaled tiotropium bromide therapy was significantly more effective than adding placebo to tiotropium bromide therapy. Thus, inhaled budesonide/formoterol, either alone or as add-on therapy to other medications, continues to be a useful option for the management of COP

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Metered Dose Inhalers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease of the lung caused primarily by exposure to cigarette smoke. Clinically, it presents with progressive cough, sputum production, dyspnea, reduced exercise capacity, and diminished quality of life. Physiologically, it is characterized by the presence of partially reversible expiratory airflow limitation and hyperinflation. Pathologically, COPD is a multicomponent disease characterized by bronchial submucosal mucous gland hypertrophy, bronchiolar mucosal hyperplasia, increased luminal inflammatory mucus, airway wall inflammation and scarring, and alveolar wall damage and destruction. Management of COPD involves both pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. Bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids are recommended medications for management of COPD especially in more severe disease. Combination therapies containing these medications are now available for the chronic management of stable COPD. The US Food and Drug Administration, recently, approved the combination of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg; Symbicort™, AstraZeneca, Sweden) delivered via a pressurized meter dose inhaler for maintenance management of stable COPD. The combination also is delivered via dry powder inhaler (Symbicort™ and Turbuhaler™, AstraZeneca, Sweden) but is not approved for use in the United States. In this review, we evaluate available data of the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Animals; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Evidence-Based Medicine; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Metered Dose Inhalers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; United States

The budesonide-formoterol dry powder inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler 160/ 4.5-640/18 microg/day) contains the long-acting beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist formoterol and the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide. Two large, 12-month trials examined the effect of budesonide-formoterol 160/4.5 microg twice daily in COPD patients who met these criteria. The studies were identical, except one in which the patients had received oral prednisolone 30 mg/ day and had inhaled formoterol 4.5 microg twice daily for 2 weeks before randomization. In terms of the FEV1, budesonide-formoterol produced an effect greater than that of both budesonide alone and formoterol alone reported in previous studies. The combination was generally more effective than either of the components in terms of peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and exacerbations. These advantages of the combination over those of either budesonide alone or formoterol alone were quite consistent. Improving lung function and decreasing symptoms significantly, budesonide-formoterol combination therapy provides significant clinical improvements in COPD, despite the limited reversibility of impaired lung function in the disease.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Humans; Powders; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Seretide (fluticasone + salmeterol--Allen & Hanburys) and Symbicort (budesonide + formoterol--AstraZeneca) inhalers have recently been licensed in the UK for the symptomatic treatment of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of repeated exacerbations. Advertising for Seretide depicts a man and states that the drug "has improved his ability to breathe and reduced his risk of exacerbations", while promotional claims for Symbicort include benefits in "reducing symptoms" and "improving quality of life". Here we assess the place of these fixed-dose combination inhalers containing a corticosteroid and a long-acting beta 2 agonist in the management of patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanolamines; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the bronchial tree, characterised by reversible obturation, bronchial mucosal inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. In the treatment of asthma, most important is avoidance of provoking allergens and regular anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids. For patients, very important is quick relief from asthma symptoms, this is why they prefer fast and long acting beta 2-agonists as a symptomatic treatment. Optimal control of asthma symptoms can be achieved with combination treatment consisting of inhaled glucocorticosteroid and beta 2-agonist. Budesonide is a corticosteroid that treats the underlying airway inflammation in asthma; formoterol is a fast and long-acting beta 2-agonist that prevents and reverses airway obstruction. Thus budesonide and formoterol have complementary effects, treating two different components of asthma. Clinical studies show that in the treatment of asthma Symbicort is more effective than double dose GCS, due to the budesonide/formoterol synergy. It is at least as effective, well tolerated and safe as its mono-products in corresponding doses given via separate inhalers. More convenient treatment represents an important benefit for patients with asthma. Symbicort is recommended for regular treatment and could also be used "as needed" due to the rapid onset of the bronchodilatory effect of formoterol.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol effectively reduces exacerbations in asthma. We aimed to investigate its efficacy compared with fixed-dose fluticasone/salmeterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. Patients with COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the previous 2 years were randomly assigned to open-label MART (Spiromax budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg 2 inhalations twice daily+1 prn) or fixed-dose therapy (Diskus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination (FSC) 500/50 µg 1 inhalation twice daily+salbutamol 100 µg prn) for 1 year. The primary outcome was rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, defined by treatment with oral prednisolone and/or antibiotics.. In total, 195 patients were randomised (MART Bud/Form n=103; fixed-dose FSC n=92). No significant difference was seen between MART and FSC therapy in exacerbation rates (1.32 vs 1.32 /year, respectively, rate ratio 1.05 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.39); p=0.741). No differences in lung function parameters or health status were observed. Total ICS dose was significantly lower with MART than FSC therapy (budesonide-equivalent 928 µg/day vs 1747 µg/day, respectively, p<0.05). Similar proportions of patients reported adverse events (MART Bud/Form: 73% vs fixed-dose FSC: 68%, p=0.408) and pneumonias (MART: 5% vs FSC: 1%, p=0.216).. This first study of MART in COPD found that budesonide/formoterol MART might be similarly effective to fluticasone/salmeterol fixed-dose therapy in moderate to severe patients with COPD, at a lower daily ICS dosage. Further evidence is needed about long-term safety.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Treatment Outcome

Clinically Important Deterioration (CID) is a novel composite measure to assess treatment effect in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the performance and utility of CID in assessing the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD.. This post-hoc analysis of four budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) studies comprised 3576 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbation. Analysis of time to first CID event (exacerbation, deterioration in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV. The proportion of patients with ≥1 CID in the four studies ranged between 63 and 77% and 69-84% with BUD/FORM and FORM, respectively, with an average 25% reduced risk of CID with BUD/FORM. All components contributed to the CID event rate. Experiencing a CID during the first 3 months was associated with poorer outcomes (lung function, quality of life, symptoms and reliever use) and increased risk of later CID events. The effect of BUD/FORM versus FORM in reducing CID risk was positively associated with the blood eosinophil count.. Our findings suggest that BUD/FORM offers protective effects for CID events compared with FORM alone, with the magnitude of the effect dependent on patients' eosinophil levels. CID may be an important tool for evaluation of treatment effect in a complex, multifaceted, and progressive disease like COPD, and a valuable tool to allow for shorter and smaller future outcome predictive trials in early drug development.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophils; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Factors

Studies suggest that acute decreases in lung hyperinflation at rest improves cardiac function and increases lung vascular perfusion from decompression of a compromised heart. In those studies, changes in resting oxygen uptake induced by medications, an alternative explanation for compensatory increased cardiac function, were not explored.. This double-blind, multicenter, double-crossover study enrolled adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, resting hyperinflation, and > 10% improvement in inspiratory capacity after 2 inhalations of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg. Metabolic, cardiac, and ventilatory function were measured 60 min pre-/post-dose at each visit. Primary endpoint was change in resting oxygen uptake for budesonide/formoterol versus placebo.. Fifty-one patients (median age: 63 years) received treatment. Compared with placebo, budesonide/formoterol significantly increased resting oxygen uptake (mean change from baseline: 1.25 vs 11.37 mL/min; P = 0.007) as well as tidal volume and minute ventilation. This occurred despite improvements in the inspiratory capacity, forced vital capacity, and expiratory volume in 1 s. No significant treatment differences were seen for oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and resting dyspnea. There was a numerical increase in oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake/heart rate). Correlations between inspiratory capacity and oxygen pulse were weak.. Budesonide/formoterol treatment in resting hyperinflated patients with COPD results in significant deflation. The increase in oxygen uptake and minute ventilation at lower lung volumes, without changes in heart rate and with minimal improvement in oxygen pulse, suggests increased oxygen demand as a contributor to increased cardiac function.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02533505.

Topics: Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cardiorespiratory Fitness; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Inspiratory Capacity; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Function Tests

Long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) has been associated with increased risk of bone and ocular comorbidities. We evaluated the effects of the triple fixed-dose combination budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, on bone mineral density (BMD) and ocular safety in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. In this extension study, a subset of patients from the 24-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind KRONOS study (NCT02497001) continued treatment (BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 μg, budesonide/formoterol fumarate [BFF] MDI 320/9.6 μg or glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate [GFF] MDI 18/9.6 μg, as a non-steroidal comparator) for an additional 28 weeks. Primary endpoints were percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD and change from baseline in lens opacities classification system III posterior subcapsular cataract (P) score, both at Week 52. Adverse events were also assessed.. In total, 456 patients were included in the safety population (53.1% male, mean age 62.8 years). Changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD (least squares mean [LSM] range - 0.12 to 0.38%) and P score (LSM range 0.02-0.15) were small for all treatments. Both BGF MDI and BFF MDI were non-inferior to GFF MDI using margins of -2% (BMD) and 0.5 units (P score). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)  was generally similar among groups. Rates of confirmed pneumonia were low overall (2.4%) and highest in the GFF MDI group (3.4%), followed by BGF MDI (2.1%) and BFF MDI (1.1%). There were no cumulative adverse effects of treatment over time as the incidence and types of TEAEs, were generally similar in the first 24 weeks of the study and after Week 24.. In patients with COPD, both ICS-containing therapies were non-inferior to GFF MDI for the primary BMD and ophthalmological endpoints. Changes from baseline in all three treatment groups over 52 weeks were small and not clinically meaningful. All treatments were well tolerated with no new or unexpected safety findings.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02536508. Registered 27 August 2015.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Bone Density; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cataract; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lens, Crystalline; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Directly recorded patient experience of symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can complement lung function and exacerbation rate data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical studies. The FULFIL study recorded daily symptoms and activity limitation together with additional patient-reported outcomes of dyspnea and HRQoL, as part of the prespecified analyses. FULFIL co-primary endpoint data have been previously reported.. FF/UMEC/VI showed greater reductions from baseline in 4-weekly mean E-RS: COPD total and all subscale scores compared with BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at each time period. FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated greater improvements from baseline at weeks 4 and 24 in SGRQ domain scores and TDI focal score compared with BUD/FOR. At weeks 4 and 24, improvements greater than the minimal clinically important difference from baseline were observed in CAT score with FF/UMEC/VI, but not BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.003).. These findings demonstrate sustained daily symptom and HRQoL benefits of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR. The inclusion of the CAT may provide data that are readily generalizable to everyday clinical practice.. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02345161.. GSK.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Female; Fluticasone; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Surveys and Questionnaires

Prevention of exacerbations is a primary goal for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapy. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the effect of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) versus formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) on reducing COPD exacerbations.. 1219 patients aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-very-severe COPD (per lung function) and a history of ≥1 COPD exacerbation received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 μg twice daily (BID) during a 4-week run-in. Patients were then randomized 1:1 to receive budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 μg BID (n = 606) or formoterol DPI 9 μg BID (n = 613) for 26 weeks. Exacerbations were identified using predefined criteria for symptom worsening and treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalization. The primary endpoint was annual rate of exacerbations.. Budesonide/formoterol pMDI resulted in a 24% reduction in annual rate of exacerbations (0.85 vs 1.12; rate ratio: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.92]; P = 0.006), and a significant risk reduction for time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.96]; P = 0.016) versus formoterol DPI. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs; ≥3%) in budesonide/formoterol and formoterol groups were COPD (4.5% vs 8.6%) and nasopharyngitis (5.0% vs 5.2%). Pneumonia AEs were reported in 0.5% and 1.0% of budesonide/formoterol-treated and formoterol-treated patients, respectively.. Budesonide/formoterol pMDI is an effective treatment option for reducing exacerbation rates in COPD patients with moderate-to-very-severe airflow limitation and history of exacerbations. No increase in pneumonia was observed with budesonide/formoterol; safety data were consistent with its established profile.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Dry Powder Inhalers; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

The results of our study demonstrate that a pharmacist-managed PTDM clinic can significantly affect glycemic control in SOT recipients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Compounding; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; United States

Large clinical trials have confirmed the long-term efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β. Post hoc analysis of 3-month post-randomization outcomes, including exacerbation rates, dropouts, symptoms, reliever use, and lung function, from three studies with similar inclusion criteria of moderate-to-very-severe COPD. Patients (n=1,571) were treated with budesonide/formoterol (B/F) 320/9 μg or placebo, twice daily; in one study, tiotropium 18 μg once daily was also given.. Over the first 3 months of treatment, fewer patients randomized to B/F experienced exacerbations versus the placebo group (111 and 196 patients with ≥1 exacerbation, respectively). This was true in each COPD severity group. Compared with placebo, B/F treatment led to significantly lower 3-month exacerbation rates in the moderate and severe COPD severity groups (46% and 57% reduction, respectively), with a nonsignificant reduction (29%) in very severe COPD. Fewer dropouts occurred among patients treated with B/F versus placebo, this effect being greater with increasing COPD severity. B/F was associated with improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s, morning peak expiratory flow rate, total reliever use, and total symptom score versus placebo.. Treatment with B/F decreased exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD within 3 months of commencing treatment. This effect was paralleled by improved lung function, less reliever medication use, and fewer symptoms, irrespective of disease severity.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Disease Progression; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Triple combination therapy with tiotropium plus budesonide/formoterol has improved lung function and reduced exacerbation risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Western countries, but no such data exist for East Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium compared with tiotropium alone in East Asian patients with severe/very severe COPD.. This 12-week, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre, open-label study was conducted in East Asia. After a 14-day run-in period during which patients received tiotropium 18 μg once daily, patients were randomized to tiotropium (18 μg once daily) + budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg 2 inhalations twice daily) or tiotropium alone (18 μg once daily). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) to the mean of values measured at Weeks 1, 6 and 12.. Pre-dose FEV1 significantly increased from baseline with tiotropium plus budesonide/formoterol (n = 287) versus tiotropium alone (n = 291) (5.0% vs 0.6%; treatment difference: 4.4% (95% CI: 1.9-6.9), P = 0.0004). Triple therapy also reduced the COPD exacerbation rate by 40.7% (P = 0.0032) and prolonged time to first exacerbation (38.6% risk reduction, P = 0.0167) versus tiotropium alone and markedly improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Incidence of adverse events was 26% for both groups.. In East Asian patients with severe/very severe COPD, adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium was associated with significant improvements in FEV1 and HRQoL and lower COPD exacerbation rates. Treatment was generally well tolerated.. NCT01397890 at Clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Aged; Asia, Eastern; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Symptom Flare Up; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide/formoterol (BF) is available in two delivery systems, the dry powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler and a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) for use in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Spiromax DPI was recently developed as an alternative to Turbuhaler DPI. In the present study, we examined whether there is a difference in the onset of bronchodilatation between BF 320/9 μg delivered by Spiromax and BF 320/9 μg delivered by Turbuhaler in 16 outpatients with stable moderate-to-severe COPD. Our results confirm the rapid onset of action of formoterol when combined with budesonide in patients with COPD and indicate that the onset of bronchodilation induced by BF Spiromax is faster than that elicited by BF Turbuhaler. Furthermore, they show that BF fixed-dose combination does not induce a decrease in SpO2 or an increase in heart rate in patients with COPD, irrespective of the DPI used to deliver this combination. Given the evidence that both inhalers have an equal safety profile, BF Spiromax offers to prescribers and COPD patients an effective alternative to BF Turbuhaler depending also on their preference, availability and cost.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Dry Powder Inhalers; Female; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index

Roflumilast, a once-daily, selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, reduces the risk of COPD exacerbations in patients with severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations. The RE(2)SPOND study is examining whether roflumilast, when added to an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) fixed-dose combination (FDC), further reduces exacerbations. The methodology is described herein.. In this Phase IV, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, participants were randomized 1:1 (stratified by long-acting muscarinic antagonist use) to receive roflumilast or placebo, plus ICS/LABA FDC, for 52 weeks. Eligible participants had severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis, had two or more moderate-severe exacerbations within 12 months, and were receiving ICS/LABA FDC for ≥3 months. The primary efficacy measure is the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations per participant per year. The secondary efficacy outcomes include mean change in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over 52 weeks, rate of severe exacerbations, and rate of moderate, severe, or antibiotic-treated exacerbations. Additional assessments include spirometry, rescue medication use, the COPD assessment test, daily symptoms using the EXACT-Respiratory symptoms (E-RS) questionnaire, all-cause and COPD-related hospitalizations, and safety and pharmacokinetic measures.. Across 17 countries, 2,354 participants were randomized from September 2011 to October 2014. Enrollment goal was met in October 2014, and study completion occurred in June 2016.. This study will further characterize the effects of roflumilast added to ICS/LABA on exacerbation rates, lung function, and health of severe-very severe COPD participants at risk of further exacerbations. The results will determine the clinical benefits of roflumilast combined with standard-of-care inhaled COPD treatment.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aminopyridines; Benzamides; Bronchitis, Chronic; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Research Design; Severity of Illness Index; Spirometry; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combinations (ICS/LABA) have emerged as first line therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with exacerbation history. No randomized clinical trial has compared exacerbation rates among COPD patients receiving budesonide/formoterol combination (BFC) and fluticasone/salmeterol combination (FSC) to date, and only limited comparative data are available. This study compared the real-world effectiveness of approved BFC and FSC treatments among matched cohorts of COPD patients in a large US managed care setting.. COPD patients (≥40 years) naive to ICS/LABA who initiated BFC or FSC treatments between 03/01/2009-03/31/2012 were identified in a geographically diverse US managed care database and followed for 12 months; index date was defined as first prescription fill date. Patients with a cancer diagnosis or chronic (≥180 days) oral corticosteroid (OCS) use within 12 months prior to index were excluded. Patients were matched 1-to-1 on demographic and pre-initiation clinical characteristics using propensity scores from a random forest model. The primary efficacy outcome was COPD exacerbation rate, and secondary efficacy outcomes included exacerbation rates by event type and healthcare resource utilization. Pneumonia objectives included rates of any diagnosis of pneumonia and pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization.. Matching of the identified 3,788 BFC and 6,439 FSC patients resulted in 3,697 patients in each group. Matched patients were well balanced on age (mean=64 years), gender (BFC: 52% female; FSC: 54%), prior COPD-related medication use, healthcare utilization, and comorbid conditions. During follow-up, no significant difference was seen between BFC and FSC patients for number of COPD-related exacerbations overall (rate ratio [RR]=1.02, 95% CI=[0.96,1.09], p=0.56) or by event type: COPD-related hospitalizations (RR=0.96), COPD-related ED visits (RR=1.11), and COPD-related office/outpatient visits with OCS and/or antibiotic use (RR=1.01). The proportion of patients diagnosed with pneumonia during the post-index period was similar for patients in each group (BFC =17.3%, FSC =19.0%, odds ratio=0.92 [0.81,1.04], p=0.19), and no difference was detected for pneumonia-related healthcare utilization by place of service.. This study demonstrated no difference in COPD-related exacerbations or pneumonia events between BFC and FSC treatment groups for patients new to ICS/LABA treatment in a real-world setting.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01921127 .

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Retrospective Studies; United States

Spiromax® is a novel dry-powder inhaler containing formulations of budesonide plus formoterol (BF). The device is intended to provide dose equivalence with enhanced user-friendliness compared to BF Turbuhaler® in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study was performed to compare inhalation parameters with empty versions of the two devices, and to investigate the effects of enhanced training designed to encourage faster inhalation.. This randomised, open-label, cross-over study included children with asthma (n = 23), adolescents with asthma (n = 27), adults with asthma (n = 50), adults with COPD (n = 50) and healthy adult volunteers (n = 50). Inhalation manoeuvres were recorded with each device after training with the patient information leaflet (PIL) and after enhanced training using an In-Check Dial device.. After PIL training, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), maximum change in pressure (∆P) and the inhalation volume (IV) were significantly higher with Spiromax than with the Turbuhaler device (p values were at least <0.05 in all patient groups). After enhanced training, numerically or significantly higher values for PIF, ∆P, IV and acceleration remained with Spiromax versus Turbuhaler, except for ∆P in COPD patients. After PIL training, one adult asthma patient and one COPD patient inhaled <30 L/min through the Spiromax compared to one adult asthma patient and five COPD patients with the Turbuhaler. All patients achieved PIF values of at least 30 L/min after enhanced training.. The two inhalers have similar resistance so inhalation flows and pressure changes would be expected to be similar. The higher flow-related values noted for Spiromax versus Turbuhaler after PIL training suggest that Spiromax might have human factor advantages in real-world use. After enhanced training, the flow-related differences between devices persisted; increased flow rates were achieved with both devices, and all patients achieved the minimal flow required for adequate drug delivery. Enhanced training could be useful, especially in COPD patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Dry Powder Inhalers; Equipment Design; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Inhalation; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Young Adult

Effects of β(2)-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB2) polymorphism on therapeutic responses to long-acting β(2)-adrenergic agonists have not been evaluated in long-term COPD trials. We aimed to investigate the effects of the ADRB2 Gly16Arg polymorphism on response to formoterol alone or in combination with the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide in patients with COPD.. Patients ≥ 40 years of age with moderate to very severe COPD from the 12-month trial I (NCT00206167) or the 6-month trial II (NCT00206154) were randomly assigned to bid budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 320/9 μg or 160/9 μg, budesonide pMDI 320 μg + formoterol dry powder inhaler 9 μg (trial II), budesonide pMDI 320 μg (trial II), formoterol dry powder inhaler 9 μg, or placebo. The effect of Gly16Arg on predose FEV(1) and 1-h postdose FEV(1), exacerbations, diary variables, and adverse events were analyzed.. No significant interaction between genotype and treatment response was observed for predose (P ≥ .197) or postdose FEV(1) (P ≥ .125) in either pharmacogenetic study (n = 2,866). The number of COPD exacerbations per patient-treatment year was low and similar across genotypes for the active treatment groups (both studies). Percentages of patients with adverse events were similar across Gly16Arg genotype groups for each treatment.. Therapeutic response and tolerability to long-term treatment with formoterol alone or in combination with budesonide was not modified by ADRB2 Gly16Arg genotype in two large independent pharmacogenetic studies in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Tolerance; Ethanolamines; Female; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2; Treatment Outcome

A new diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often made during the evaluation of patients requiring a surgical intervention for lung cancer. Based on initial impaired lung function, these untreated patients are often considered not fit for lung surgery. There is limited information on the short-term effectiveness of preoperative pharmacologic treatment strategies in patients with newly diagnosed COPD before lung surgery.. A prospective randomized study was conducted comparing 1-week-treatment periods of tiotropium/formoterol/budenoside (GR1) with tiotropium/formoterol (GR2) in conjunction with smoking cessation and chest physiotherapy. No patients had been previously treated for COPD. The primary end point was body plethysmography (forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and airway resistance (RAW)) at the end of each treatment period. Secondary end points were improvement of ≥ 10% in FEV1 (% predicted) and improvement of the severity of COPD after the 1-week treatment, as well as the rate of pulmonary complications after surgery.. A total of 46 patients were randomized in GR1 (n=24) and GR2 (n=22). Both groups were comparable with regard to age, height, weight, smoking history, baseline body plethysmography (FVC, FEV1, and RAW), and the severity of COPD according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) staging, respectively. However, the short-term effects of the treatment with regard to FEV1 (2.0 l vs 1.7 l; p=0.031) and increase of FEV1 (0.31 l vs 0.10 l; p=0.02) were better in GR1. More patients in GR1 had an improvement of ≥ 10% in FEV1 (p=0.004) and improvement of the severity of COPD (p=0.012) after the 1-week treatment. Fewer pulmonary complications (11.1% vs 42.9%, p=0.04) were observed in GR1 after surgery.. Both therapies resulted in an improvement of lung function. There is benefit from adding inhalative budenoside to tiotropium and formoterol in terms of an improvement in FEV1 and the severity of COPD. These beneficial results might lead to less pulmonary complications in the postoperative period.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Airway Resistance; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epidemiologic Methods; Ethanolamines; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Plethysmography, Whole Body; Pneumonectomy; Preoperative Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Scopolamine Derivatives; Smoking Cessation; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Lowest receptor occupancy for a drug occurs at trough prior to the next dose. Previous studies have focused on the effects of triple therapy at peak dose intervals using forced expiratory maneuvers. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) and body plethysmography (PLETH) are more sensitive than spirometry to assess inhaled therapies in COPD.. Nineteen patients with COPD (FEV(1)/FVC ratio < 0.7; FEV(1) < 60%) completed a double-blind randomized crossover trial of tiotropium 18 microg/d or placebo for 2 weeks each, with a 1-week washout. Prior to this procedure, there was a nonrandomized 4 week run-in of budesonide/formoterol 200/6 2 puffs bid, which continued throughout the study. Spirometry, IOS, and PLETH were performed both before pre- and post-budesonide/formoterol run-in and at trough following the first and last dose of tiotropium (ie, 24 h posttiotropium and 12 h post-budesonide/formoterol).. Mean +/- SEM for age and FEV(1) were 65 +/- 2 years and 42 +/- 2%, respectively. Following initial budesonide/formoterol, there were no significant changes in spirometry; however, all measures of IOS and PLETH deteriorated (P < .01 for all outcomes). Compared with placebo, tiotropium was additive to budesonide/formoterol after single and chronic dosing measured by FEV(1) (P < .001 and P = .014, respectively) and forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase (P = .001; P= .026), whereas specific airway resistance, reactance, resonant frequency, and area under the reactance curve showed additive benefits at a single dose only.. Budesonide/formoterol caused an unexpected worsening of IOS and PLETH outcomes compared with a washed-out baseline in the nonplacebo-controlled run-in. This finding was not observed with spirometry. Subsequent addition of tiotropium improved lung function with all techniques after a single dose and for spirometry after chronic dosing. These paradoxical findings may reflect beta2-adrenoceptor downregulation and muscarinic 3 receptor cross talk. Placebo-controlled studies are required to explore this result.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Biological Availability; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanolamines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oscillometry; Plethysmography, Whole Body; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Data on the onset of action of COPD medications are lacking. This study compared the onset of bronchodilation following different inhaled therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and reversible airway obstruction.. In this double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study, 90 patients (aged >or=40 years; FEV(1) 30-70% predicted) were randomized to a single dose (two inhalations) of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 25/250 microg, salbutamol 100 microg or placebo (via pressurized metered-dose inhalers) on four visits. The primary end-point was change in FEV(1) 5 min after drug inhalation; secondary end-points included inspiratory capacity (IC) and perception of onset of effect.. Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved FEV(1) at 5 min compared with placebo (P < 0.0001) and salmeterol/fluticasone (P = 0.0001). Significant differences were first observed at 3 min. Onset of effect was similar with budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol. Improvements in FEV(1) following active treatments were superior to placebo after 180 min (all P < 0.0001); both combinations were better than salbutamol at maintaining FEV(1) improvements (P

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Airway Obstruction; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Spirometry; Time Factors

The efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler compared with placebo, budesonide and formoterol were evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a 12-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 812 adults (mean age 64 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 36% predicted normal), patients received two inhalations twice daily of either budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) 160/4.5 microg (delivered dose), budesonide 200 microg (metered dose), formoterol 4.5 microg or placebo. Severe exacerbations and FEV1 (primary variables), peak expiratory flow (PEF), COPD symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL), mild exacerbations, use of reliever beta2-agonist and safety variables were recorded. Budesonide/formoterol reduced the mean number of severe exacerbations per patient per year by 24% versus placebo and 23% versus formoterol. FEV1 increased by 15% versus placebo and 9% versus budesonide. Morning PEF improved significantly on day 1 versus placebo and budesonide; after 1 week, morning PEF was improved versus placebo, budesonide and formoterol. Improvements in morning and evening PEF versus comparators were maintained over 12 months. Budesonide/formoterol decreased all symptom scores and use of reliever beta2-agonists significantly versus placebo and budesonide, and improved HRQL versus placebo. All treatments were well tolerated. These results suggest a role for budesonide/formoterol in the long-term management of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Time Factors

To investigate the clinical efficacy of combining budesonide formoterol with tiotropium bromide for treating asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (AOCS).. The data of 104 patients with AOCS admitted to our hospital from December 2019 to December 2020 were assessed, randomly and divided into an experimental group (comprising 52 patients, receiving drug combination therapy) and a conventional group (comprising 52 patients, receiving drug therapy alone). Patients' clinical efficacy, pulmonary function, fractioned exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), immune function, endothelial function, serum lipid peroxidation injury indexes, adverse reactions, and quality of life scores were compared.. Prior to treatment, no significant differences were observed in various pulmonary function indicators, FeNO, immune function, endothelial function, and lipid peroxidation injury indexes between the two groups (. The combination of budesonide formoterol to tiotropium bromide in treating asthma-COPD overlap syndrome may significantly improve pulmonary function, endothelial function, and immune status of patients and encourage the recovery of serum lipid peroxidation injury; therefore, this may deserve widespread adoption and application.

Topics: Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the lung manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We assessed whether inhaled tiotropium add-on to the combination regimen including budesonide/formoterol improve pulmonary function and the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) scores in patients with BOS.. Post-HSCT patients diagnosed as BOS in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Patients defined as BOS and treated with budesonide/formoterol/tiotropium combination therapy after budesonide/formoterol therapy from January 2011 to June 2019 were enrolled.. Total of 86 patients were evaluated. After tiotropium add-on, the absolute FEV1 increased significantly from 1.47 ± 0.49 to 1.53 ± 0.57 L (p = 0.023) and the % predicted FEV1 from 45.0 ± 12.8 to 46.8 ± 14.5% (p = 0.031). The % predicted DLCO increased significantly after tiotropium add-on (from 61.6 ± 16.7 to 64.3 ± 16.3%, p = 0.028). Among 56 patients with complete CAT scores, no significant change was present in total CAT scores. In all, 30 of the 72 patients (41.7%) evidenced FEV1 increases > 100 mL, and 20 of 56 patients (35.7%) had CAT score decreases of ≥ 2 points. When the FEV1 and CAT scores were combined, the overall response rate to tiotropium add-on was 56.2% (41/73). The response group evidenced a significantly greater FVC increase, and a significant decrease in the RV/TLC ratio compared to the no-response group.. Inhaled tiotropium add-on to combination budesonide/formoterol significantly improved lung function, but not respiratory symptoms, in patients with post-HSCT BOS.

Topics: Bronchiolitis Obliterans; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Retrospective Studies; Tiotropium Bromide

A heavy financial burden is imposed on patients suffering from chronic diseases due to medicine out-of-pocket payments.. This study focuses on assessing the affordability of medications used for chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis (CF) in Iran, specifically on the category R medicines listed in the 2017 Iran drug list (IDL) that are used for the treatment of these diseases, based on the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) drug code.. The affordability of medicines in mono and combination therapy approaches was assessed in CRDs using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Accordingly, if out-of-pocket payment for 30-days of pharmacotherapy exceeds one day for the lowest-paid unskilled government worker (LPGW), it's considered non-affordable.. Based on the monotherapy approach, our finding demonstrates that all generic medicines of category R were affordable. However, branded drugs such as Symbicort®, Pulmicort Respules®, Flusalmex®, Seretide®, Fluticort Plus®, Seroflo®, and Salmeflo® cost between 1.2 and 2.5 days' wage of LPGW and considered unaffordable despite 70% insurance coverage. Moreover, based on the affordability ratio in the combination therapy approach, all medicines used in asthma, COPD, and CF patients with mild respiratory problems are affordable except omalizumab (inj), which is non-affordable due to its high price and no insurance coverage.. Results showed that the existing insurance coverage does not protect households from hardship, so more considerations are needed such as different insurance schedules and patient support programs.

Topics: Asthma; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Costs and Cost Analysis; Cystic Fibrosis; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a health problem that results in death, commonly due to the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Here, by utilizing a mouse model of intratracheal elastase-induced emphysema that presents three different phases of COPD, we sought to observe whether budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate (BGF) triple therapy could prevent COPD-PH in addition to ameliorating COPD progression.. We utilized intratracheal elastase-induced emphysema mouse model and performed experiments in three phases illustrating COPD progression: inflammatory (1 day post-elastase), emphysema (3 weeks post-elastase) and PH (4 weeks post-elastase), while treatments of BGF and controls (vehicle, one-drug, and two-drug combinations) were started in prior to elastase instillation (inflammatory phase), at day 7 (emphysema), or at day 14 (PH phase). Phenotype analyses were performed in each phase. In vitro, A549 cells or isolated mouse lung endothelial cells (MLEC) were treated with TNFα with/without BGF treatment to analyze NFκB signaling and cytokine expression changes.. We observed significant reductions in the proinflammatory phenotype observed in the lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) 1 day after elastase administration in mice treated with BGF compared with that in mice administered elastase alone (BALF neutrophil percentage, p = 0.0011 for PBS/Vehicle vs. PBS/Elastase, p = 0.0161 for PBS/Elastase vs. BGF). In contrast, only BGF treatment significantly ameliorated the elastase-induced emphysematous lung structure and desaturation after three weeks of elastase instillation (mean linear intercept, p = 0.0156 for PBS/Vehicle vs. PBS/Elastase, p = 0.0274 for PBS/Elastase vs. BGF). Furthermore, BGF treatment prevented COPD-PH development, as shown by improvements in the hemodynamic and histological phenotypes four weeks after elastase treatment (right ventricular systolic pressure, p = 0.0062 for PBS/Vehicle vs. PBS/Elastase, p = 0.027 for PBS/Elastase vs. BGF). Molecularly, BGF acts by inhibiting NFκB-p65 phosphorylation and subsequently decreasing the mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines in both alveolar epithelial and pulmonary endothelial cells.. Our results collectively showed that BGF treatment could prevent PH in addition to ameliorating COPD progression via the inhibition of inflammatory NFκB signaling.

Topics: Animals; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Emphysema; Endothelial Cells; Formoterol Fumarate; Fumarates; Glycopyrrolate; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Mice; NF-kappa B; Pancreatic Elastase; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Emphysema

This is a retrospective, descriptive study of linked primary and secondary healthcare data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, Hospital Episode Statistics). Patients with COPD were indexed on first prescription of fixed-dose, single-device ICS/LABA (June 2015-December 2018). Demographics, clinical characteristics, prescribed treatments, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were assessed over 12 months pre-index. Incident users (indexed on first ever prescription) could be non-triple users (no concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist at index); a subset were initial maintenance therapy (IMT) users (no history of pre-index maintenance therapy).. Overall, 13 451 incident users (non-triple users: 7448, 55.4%; IMT users: 5162, 38.4%) were indexed on beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (6122, 45.5%), budesonide/formoterol (2703, 20.1%) or Other ICS/LABA combinations (4626, 34.4%). Overall, 20.8% of incident users had comorbid asthma and 42.6% had ≥1 moderate-to-severe acute exacerbation of COPD pre-index. Baseline characteristics were similar across indexed therapies. At 3 months pre-index, 45.3% and 35.4% of non-triple and IMT users were receiving maintenance treatment. HCRU and direct healthcare costs were similar across indexed treatments. Prescribing patterns varied regionally.. Patient characteristics, prior treatments, prior COPD-related HCRU and direct healthcare costs were similar across single-device ICS/LABAs in primary care in England. A high proportion of patients were not receiving any respiratory medication pre-index, indicating that prescribing in primary care in England is more closely aligned with national guidelines than global treatment strategies. Comorbid asthma may have influenced prescribing decisions. Less than half of users had preindex exacerbations, suggesting that ICS/LABA is not being prescribed principally based on exacerbation history.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Asthma; Beclomethasone; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Primary Health Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol (BUD/GLY/FOR) versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA, respectively, in patients with moderate to severe COPD, from the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.. A lifetime Markov model with monthly cycle length was developed with baseline and treatment effect data from ETHOS clinical trial, together with utility values from literature and Spanish healthcare resource costs (€, 2021). A 3% annual discount rate was used for costs and benefits. The model comprised ten health states: nine forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)-related, which were divided by three levels of severity: moderate (FEV1 ≥50% and <80%); severe (FEV1 ≥30% and <50%) and very severe (FEV1 <30%) and a death state. Each FEV1-health state was divided into no exacerbation, moderate exacerbation, and severe exacerbations. An expert panel validated data and assumptions. Outcomes were measured as incremental cost per exacerbation avoided, per life year (LY) gained, and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ICUR). One-way (OWSA), scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.. According to this cost-effectiveness analysis based on a Markov model, BUD/GLY/FOR was associated with a lower totals exacerbation per patient (12.80) compared to LAMA/LABA (13.36) and ICS/LABA (13.23) and higher LYs (10.32 vs 10.14 and 10.06, respectively) and QALYs (7.55 vs 7.41 and 7.32, respectively). The incremental costs were €850.95, and €2422.26, respectively, per exacerbation avoided, €2733.38 and €4111.15, respectively, per LY gained and €3461.19 and €4545.24 per QALY gained. OWSA showed that the model was most sensitive to the costs of treatments following discontinuation, but the ICUR remained below the cost-effectiveness threshold of €25,000 per QALY gained. In the PSA, the probability of BUD/GLY/FOR being cost-effective was 91.32% vs LAMA/LABA and 99.29% vs ICS/LABA.. BUD/GLY/FOR is a cost-effective treatment strategy for Spanish NHS patients with COPD compared to dual therapies.

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Formoterol Fumarate; Fumarates; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Spain

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Patient Preference; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Despite multiple available fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of inhaled long-acting β. Can comparative effectiveness and safety of LABA plus LAMA (LABA/LAMA) and LABA plus ICS (LABA/ICS) FDCs vary by different individual components of the dual combinations in COPD?. We conducted a new user, propensity score-inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort study to compare the effectiveness and safety of two frequently used LABA/LAMA FDCs (indacaterol plus glycopyrronium [IND/GLY] and vilanterol plus umeclidinium [VI/UMEC]) vs three commonly prescribed LABA/ICS FDCs (salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate [SAL/FP], formoterol fumarate plus budesonide [FF/BUD], and formoterol fumarate plus beclomethasone dipropionate [FF/BDP]) using the Taiwanese nationwide health care claims from 2014 through 2017. The primary effectiveness outcome was the annual moderate to severe exacerbation rate, and safety outcomes included risks of severe pneumonia and cardiovascular disease requiring hospitalization. Weighted generalized linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively.. Patients with COPD initiating IND/GLY and VI/UMEC showed an 11% (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.98) and 20% (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90) reduced annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations, respectively, than those initiating SAL/FP, but showed a similar rate as those initiating FF/BUD or FF/BDP. Both LABA/LAMA FDCs, compared with SAL/FP and VI/UMEC vs FF/BDP, were associated with a 27% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.90) to 42% (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.70) reduced pneumonia risk. Cardiovascular risk was comparable in five groups. An intraclass difference existed in rates of moderate to severe COPD exacerbation and risks of pneumonia among LABA/ICS FDCs, but not between LABA/LAMA FDCs.. Both LABA/LAMAs vs SAL/FP are associated with a lower exacerbation rate and pneumonia risk, but exhibit similar effectiveness and safety outcomes compared with FF/BDP or FF/BUD, suggesting that comparative effects may differ by individual components of the dual therapies in COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Beclomethasone; Benzyl Alcohols; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Chlorobenzenes; Cohort Studies; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pneumonia; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines

Previous studies have found suboptimal control of symptom burden to be widespread among patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Phase IV SPRINT study was conducted in 10 countries in Europe to assess asthma disease control and COPD symptom burden in patients treated with a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta agonists (LABAs). SPRINT included 1101 patients with asthma and 560 with COPD; all were receiving treatment with an FDC of ICS/LABA, delivered via various inhalers. Data were obtained over a 3-month period, during a single routine physician's office visit. Asthma control was defined as Asthma Control Test (ACT) score >19. COPD symptom burden was assessed by COPD Assessment Test (CAT), with a CAT score <10 defining low COPD symptom burden. Among patients using any ICS/LABA FDC, 62% of patients with asthma had achieved disease control (ACT score >19) and 16% of patients with COPD had low symptom burden (CAT score <10).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Europe; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the incidence of active tuberculosis (TB) among COPD patients using fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol, and to identify any differences between these two groups of patients.. The study enrolled COPD patients from Taiwan NHIRD who received treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol for > 90 days between 2004 and 2011. The incidence of active TB was the primary outcome.. Among the intention-to-treat population prior to matching, the incidence rates of active TB were 0.94 and 0.61% in the fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol groups, respectively. After matching, the fluticasone/salmeterol group had significantly higher rates of active TB (adjusted HR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.17-1.70) compared with the budesonide/formoterol group. The significant difference between these two groups remained after a competing risk analysis (HR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.21-1.74). Following propensity score matching, the fluticasone/salmeterol group had significantly higher rates of active TB compared with the budesonide/formoterol group (adjusted HR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.14-1.85). A similar trend was observed after a competing risk analysis (HR, 1.44, 95% CI, 1.19-1.75). A higher risk of active TB was observed in the fluticasone/salmeterol group compared with the budesonide/formoterol group across all subgroups, but some differences did not reach statistical significance.. Fluticasone/salmeterol carried a higher risk of active TB compared with budesonide/formoterol among COPD patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Propensity Score; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Factors; Taiwan; Tuberculosis

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Europe; Female; Humans; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index

This study aimed to compare the effect of budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol on the risk and outcomes of sepsis in COPD patients. We conducted this study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We included COPD patients prescribed with budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol between 2004 and 2011. Outcomes including sepsis and mortality were measured. 10,267 COPD patients who received fluticasone/salmeterol and 6,844 patients who received budesonide/formoterol were enrolled into this study and then subsequence were adjusted by propensity score weighting. The incidence of sepsis was 5.74 and 4.99 per 100 person-years for the patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol, respectively. Fluticasone/salmeterol was associated with higher risk of sepsis (aHR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.07-1.24) and septic shock (aHR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.01-1.29) than budesonide/formoterol. Besides, fluticasone/salmeterol was associated with higher risk of death (aHR, 1.090; 95%CI, 1.01-1.18) than budesonide/formoterol. Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had a significant higher risk of sepsis related respiratory organ dysfunction, lower respiratory tract infection, genitourinary tract infection, bacteremia and skin infection. In conclusion, long-term treatment with budesonide/formoterol was associated with lower rates of sepsis and deaths than fluticasone/salmeterol in patients with COPD.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Sepsis

Use of inhaled corticosteroids and long acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapy has been shown to decrease the frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this population, adherence to treatment is associated with better disease control and lower risk of COPD-related exacerbations in the future. Using a treatment with a more convenient regimen or easier-to-use device could improve patient adherence, improve disease control, decrease the frequency of exacerbations and minimize the COPD-related economic burden. Real-world information on the impact on healthcare costs and exacerbation risk of initiating once-daily or twice daily ICS/LABA in this patient population is limited. The objective of this study was to assess COPD-related healthcare costs, adherence, and exacerbations in COPD patients initiating treatment with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 (FF/VI) or budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 (BUD/F) using a large managed care database in the US.. This was a retrospective cohort study among COPD patients initiating FF/VI or BUD/F between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2016. The analysis used the Optum Research Database (ORD) which contains patients from commercial and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plans. The study included new initiators of ICS/LABA as either FF/VI or BUD/F for COPD, ≥40 years of age at index, ≥15 months of continuous enrollment (12 months pre-index and ≥3 months post-index). New users of FF/VI or BUD/F were matched on baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM) methods. Multivariate models including ordinary least squares regression, Lin's regression, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess differences between the cohorts on outcomes of interest.. A total of 18,652 subjects met all inclusion and exclusion criteria with 5044 initiating FF/VI and 13,608 initiating BUD/F. Of these, 9026 subjects were matched at a 1:1 ratio (4513 patients in each cohort) and were included in the final analyses. Proportion of days covered (PDC), was significantly better for FF/VI (mean PDC [SD]: FF/VI: 0.46 [0.31], BUD/F: 0.41 [0.29], p < 0.001) while FF/VI was associated with a 9% lower risk (adj. hazard ratio (HR): 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96) of having a moderate or severe COPD-related exacerbation. However, COPD-related healthcare costs were not significantly different, $11,521 vs $10,986, p = 0.41 for FF/VI and BUD/F, respectively.. Patients initiating once-daily FF/VI were more adherent, and were associated with a lower risk of subsequent COPD-related exacerbations compared with twice-daily BUD/F, however this was not associated with a significant difference in costs. (GSK Study HO1617333/206702).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Chlorobenzenes; Cost of Illness; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Adherence and Compliance

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (B/F) and tiotropium combination in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Chinese patients.Between January 2015 and November 2017, 113 eligible Chinese patients with COPD were included and divided into an intervention group and a control group. Sixty-three patients in the intervention group underwent B/F combined tiotropium, while 50 patients in the control group received tiotropium alone. The primary outcome was severity of dyspnea on exertion (DOE), measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) scale. The secondary outcomes included lung function, measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), quality of life, measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and adverse events. All outcomes were measured at the end of 12-week treatment.B/F and tiotropium combination showed greater efficacy in DOE (P < .01), lung function (P < .01), and quality of life (P < .01), compared with tiotropium alone at the end of 12-week treatment. In addition, adverse events in both groups were similar and tolerable.The findings suggest that B/F and tiotropium combination can be used as an effective treatment in Chinese patients with COPD.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asian People; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Respiratory Function Tests; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Walk Test

The effectiveness of inhaled therapies can be influenced by many factors, including the type of inhaler, which may have clinical implications. We report a real-world, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, non-interventional study conducted by 200 pulmonologists across 200 centers in Hungary. The effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol inhalation therapy in daily clinical practice, delivered via the Bufomix Easyhaler. Effectiveness was assessed after 12 weeks of treatment by spirometry, the Asthma Control Test, mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale. Patient satisfaction with the Bufomix Easyhaler. A total of 1498 patients with obstructive airway disease were evaluated (asthma: n = 621; COPD: n = 778; ACO: n = 99), of whom 455 (30.4%) were newly diagnosed inhaler-naïve patients and 1043 (69.6%) were switching from other inhalers. Significant improvements in lung function, disease control and health-related quality of life measures (all p ≤ 0.002) were reported after 12 weeks of Bufomix Easyhaler. Twelve weeks' treatment with the Bufomix Easyhaler. Orion Corp., Orion Pharma.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient Satisfaction; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Respiratory Tract Absorption; Treatment Outcome

When discontinuation in COPD randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is unevenly distributed between treatments (differential dropout), the capacity to demonstrate treatment effects may be reduced. We investigated the impact of the time of differential dropout on exacerbation outcomes in RCTs, in relation to study duration and COPD severity.. A post hoc analysis of 2,345 patients from three RCTs of 6- and 12-month duration was performed to compare budesonide/formoterol and formoterol in moderate, severe, and very severe COPD. Outcomes were exacerbation rate, time-to-first exacerbation, or discontinuation; patients were stratified by disease severity. Outcomes were studied by censoring data monthly from 1 to 12 months.. In patients treated with budesonide/formoterol, annualized exacerbation rates (AERs) were comparable for each study duration (rate ratio [RR] =0.6). With formoterol, the AER decreased with study duration (RR =1.20 at 1 month to RR =0.86 at 12 months). There was a treatment-related difference in exacerbation rates of 45%-48% for shorter study durations (≤4 months) and 27% for 12-month duration. This treatment-related difference in exacerbation rates was comparable for the three disease severities in studies ≤4 months (range: 39%-51%), but this difference decreased with longer study durations, especially in more severe groups (22% and 29% at 12 months). There were fewer discontinuations with budesonide/formoterol; the treatment-related difference in time-to-first discontinuation decreased by study duration (35%, 30%, 26%, and 22% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively). Numbers of differential dropouts increased with increasing disease severity, being greatest during second, third, and fourth months.. COPD severity and study duration impact exacerbation as an outcome in double-blind RCTs. This effect is most obvious in patients with severe/very severe COPD and in studies that are longer than 4 months. Early differential dropout particularly impacts study outcome, producing a "healthy survivor effect," which reduces estimations of treatment impact on exacerbations.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β. A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler. In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06.. We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Dry Powder Inhalers; Formoterol Fumarate; Germany; Glucocorticoids; Health Care Costs; Humans; Italy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Sweden

It remains unclear whether severe exacerbation and pneumonia of COPD differs between patients treated with budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of those who used budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol for COPD.. Subjects in this population-based cohort study comprised patients with COPD who were treated with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol. All patients were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. The outcomes including severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were measured.. During the study period, 11,519 COPD patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and 7,437 patients receiving budesonide/formoterol were enrolled in the study. Pairwise matching (1:1) of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol populations resulted in to two similar subgroups comprising each 7,295 patients. Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher annual rate and higher risk of severe exacerbation than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (1.2219/year vs 1.1237/year, adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10). In addition, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (12.11 per 100 person-years vs 10.65 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20). Finally, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia requiring MV than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (3.94 per 100 person-years vs 3.47 per 100 person-years, aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24). A similar trend was seen before and after propensity score matching analysis, intention-to-treat, and as-treated analysis with and without competing risk.. Based on this retrospective observational study, long-term treatment with fixed combination budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring MV than fluticasone/salmeterol in COPD patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Databases, Factual; Disease Progression; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Logistic Models; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiration, Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Equitable access to affordable medicines and diagnostic tests is an integral component of optimal clinical care of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In Uganda, we lack contemporary data about the availability, cost and affordability of medicines and diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD management.. Data on the availability, cost and affordability of 17 medicines and 2 diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD management were collected from 22 public hospitals, 23 private and 85 private pharmacies. The percentage of the available medicines and diagnostic tests, the median retail price of the lowest priced generic brand and affordability in terms of the number of days' wages it would cost the least paid public servant were analysed.. The availability of inhaled short acting beta agonists (SABA), oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), inhaled LABA-ICS combinations and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in all the study sites was 75%, 60.8%, 46.9% and 45.4% respectively. None of the study sites had inhaled long acting anti muscarinic agents (LAMA) and inhaled long acting beta agonist (LABA)-LAMA combinations. Spirometry and peak flow-metry as diagnostic tests were available in 24.4% and 6.7% of the study sites respectively. Affordability ranged from 2.2 days' wages for inhaled salbutamol to 17.1 days' wages for formoterol/budesonide inhalers and 27.8 days' wages for spirometry.. Medicines and diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD care are not widely available in Uganda and remain largely unaffordable. Strategies to improve access to affordable asthma and COPD medicines and diagnostic tests should be implemented in Uganda.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Function Tests; Spirometry; Uganda

Metabolomics is the global unbiased analysis of all the small-molecule metabolites within a biological system. Metabolic profiling of different high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) phenotypes of COPD patients before and after treatment may identify discriminatory metabolites that can serve as biomarkers and therapeutic agents.. Inhaled budesonide-formoterol therapy for both phenotype E (emphysema without bronchial wall thickening) and phenotype M (emphysema with bronchial wall thickening) was effective. However, phenotype E and phenotype M were different in response to therapy. Patients with phenotype M in response to therapeutic effects were significantly greater compared with phenotype E. Certain metabolites were identified, which were closely related to the treatment and phenotype. Metabolic changes in phenotype E or phenotype M after treatment may be involved with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), guanosine, choline, malonate, tyrosine, glycine, proline, l-alanine, l-valine, l-threonine leucine, uridine, pyruvic acid, acetone and metabolism disturbance. Metabolic differences between phenotype E and phenotype M in pretreatment and posttreatment covered glycine, d-glucose, pyruvic acid, succinate, lactate, proline, l-valine and leucine.. Bronchial wall thickening in COPD may be an indicator for predicting the better response to the treatment with bronchodilator and corticosteroid. The identification of metabolic alterations provides new insights into different HRCT phenotypes and therapeutic assessment of COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Biomarkers; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Lung; Male; Metabolomics; Middle Aged; Phenotype; Predictive Value of Tests; Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

The dose emitted from dry powder inhalers (DPI) is inhalation flow dependent and so varies with the peak inhalation flow (PIF) of a patient's inhalation maneuver (IM). Dose emission could also be affected by other IM parameters-the inhaled volume (V

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aerosols; Aged; Algorithms; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Particle Size; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Multi-dose dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are commonly used in asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) treatment. A disadvantage is their sensitivity to humidity. In real life, DPIs are periodically exposed to humid conditions, which may affect aerosol characteristics and lung deposition. This study compared DPI aerosol performance after exposure to humidity. Budesonide (BUD) inhalers (Turbuhaler; Novolizer; Easyhaler) and budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) inhalers (Turbuhaler; Spiromax; Easyhaler) were stored in 75% relative humidity (RH) at both ambient temperature and at -0 °C. Delivered dose (DD) and fine-particle dose (FPD) were tested in vitro before and after storage. BUD inhalers: Turbuhaler and Novolizer showed only small decreases (<15%) in FPD in 40 °C/75% RH, whereas FPD for Easyhaler decreased by >60% (P=0.01) after 1.5 months of storage. Easyhaler also decreased significantly after 6 months of storage in ambient/75%RH by 25% and 54% for DD and FPD, respectively, whereas only small decreases were seen for Turbuhaler and Novolizer (<15%). BUD/FORM inhalers: Turbuhaler and Spiromax DD were unchanged in 40 °C/75% RH, whereas Easyhaler showed a small decrease. FPD (budesonide) decreased for Turbuhaler, Spiromax and Easyhaler by 18%, 10% and 68% (all significant), respectively, at 40 °C/75% RH. In ambient/75%RH, DD was unchanged for all inhalers, whereas FPD (budesonide) decreased for Spiromax (7%, P=0.02) and Easyhaler (34%, (P<0.01)). There are significant differences in device performance after exposure to humid conditions. A clinically relevant decrease of more than half FPD was seen for one of the inhalers, a decrease that may affect patients' clinical outcomes. Prescriber and patient knowledge on device attributes are essential to ensure optimal drug delivery to the lungs.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Humidity; In Vitro Techniques; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

The objective of this study was to evaluate the different outcomes associated with the use of budesonide/formoterol compared to fluticasone/salmeterol in fixed combinations in patients with COPD in a "real-world" setting. The outcomes included exacerbation rates and health care costs.. An observational retrospective cohort analysis, based on administrative databases of three local health units, was conducted. Patients with at least one prescription of fixed-dose combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol), at dosages and formulations approved for COPD in Italy, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 (inclusion period), were included. Patients were followed until December 2012, death or end of treatment (follow-up period), whichever occurred first. Patients were included if they were aged ≥40 years and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Propensity score matching was performed to check for confounding effects. Number of hospitalizations for COPD and number of oral corticosteroid and antibiotic prescriptions during follow-up were analyzed using Poisson regression models. The cost analysis was conducted from the perspective of the National Health System.. Among patients with COPD, treatment with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer exacerbations and a lower, but not significant, cost of illness than the treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol. Real-world analyses are requested to ameliorate interventions to address unmet needs, optimizing treatment pathways to improve COPD-related burden and outcomes.

Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Databases, Factual; Disease Progression; Drug Costs; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Italy; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the association between inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) exposure patterns and the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, we performed a nested case-control study. Between 1998 and 2010, 51,739 patients, including 19,838 cases of pneumonia, were matched to 74,849 control subjects selected from a cohort of COPD patients using ICSs via risk-set sampling of the database constructed by the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan. After adjusting for covariates, the current use of ICSs was associated with a 25% increase in the risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] =1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.20-1.30), and there was an increase in the OR with increase in the average daily dosage. Additionally, users of fluticasone/salmeterol, fluticasone, and either fluticasone/salmeterol or fluticasone were more likely to be at a higher risk of pneumonia (OR =1.35, 95% CI =1.28-1.41; OR =1.22, 95% CI =1.10-1.35; and OR =1.33, 95% CI =1.27-1.39, respectively). In contrast, there were no statistically significant associations between the risk of pneumonia and the use of budesonide/formoterol, budesonide, or either budesonide/formoterol or budesonide. In conclusion, ICSs are significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in COPD patients. The effect is prominent for fluticasone-containing ICSs but not for budesonide-containing ICSs.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Databases, Factual; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Logistic Models; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Pneumonia; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) is associated with rapid decline in lung function, poorer health-related quality-of-life outcomes, and frequent exacerbations, compared to COPD alone. Although the numbers of patients with ACOS have increased, there is little established evidence regarding diagnostic criteria and treatment options. Thus, the aim of our study was to clarify the clinical, physiological, and radiological features of patients with ACOS.. We examined a total of 100 patients with COPD and 40 patients with ACOS, who were selected based on clinical criteria. All patients underwent baseline testing, including a COPD assessment test, pulmonary function tests, and multidetector row computed tomography imaging. Percentage of low attenuation volume, percentage of wall area, and percentage of total cross-sectional area of pulmonary vessels less than 5 mm(2) (%CSA <5) were determined using multidetector row computed tomography. ACOS patients were administered a fixed dose of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg, two inhalations; twice daily) for 12 weeks, after which the ACOS patients underwent multidetector row computed tomography to measure the same parameters.. At baseline, the ACOS patients and COPD patients had a similar degree of airflow limitation, vital capacity, and residual volume. ACOS patients had higher COPD assessment test scores, percentage of wall area, and %CSA <5 than COPD patients. Compared to baseline, budesonide/formoterol treatment significantly increased the forced expiratory volume in 1 second and decreased the degree of airway wall thickness (percentage of wall area) as well as pulmonary microvascular density (%CSA <5) in ACOS patients.. Our results suggest that ACOS is characterized by an airway lesion-dominant phenotype, in contrast to COPD. Higher %CSA <5 might be a characteristic feature of ACOS.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Phenotype; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Veins; Recovery of Function; Respiratory Function Tests; Syndrome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The use of a combination inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol (BUD/FOR) to both maintenance and quick relief therapy has been recommended as an improved method of using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β agonist therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of BUD/FOR and testing the availability of BUD/FOR for early reversibility test in patients with airway obstruction.. The study was conducted on patients who were admitted to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Samsun Medical Park Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.. A total of 44 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 48.5 ± 17.3 (range 10-75) years and the male-to-female ratio was 36:8. The pre-bronchodilator pulmonary function test results are as follows: the mean forced vital capacity, 3,025 ± 1,162 mL (76.3% ± 23.2%); mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), 1,898 ± 725 mL (59.2% ± 19.1%); mean FEV1/forced vital capacity, 62.8 ± 6.3% (range 42%-70%); mean peak expiratory flow, 3,859 ± 1,779 mL (48.0% ± 19.7%); and forced expiratory flow 25%-75%, 1,295 ± 486 mL (35.8% ± 12.3%). The reversibility was positive in 26 (59.1%) patients. The absolute change and percentage of change in FEV1 were 318 ± 228 mL and 17.7% ± 11.9%, respectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to reversibility (reversible and irreversible) and both groups were compared with changes according to spirometric results. FEV1 values were statistically different between the two groups.. The fixed combination of BUD/FOR has rapid bronchodilator effect, and they can be used for early reversibility test.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Airway Obstruction; Asthma; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Child; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Spirometry; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Turkey; Vital Capacity; Young Adult

A combination of long-acting anticholinergic agents (LAACs) and long-acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) is effective in improving lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with monotherapy. However, evidence on whether this combination increases the incidence of stroke or other cardiac events remains sparse. The objective of the present study was to investigate the incidence of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases in COPD patients treated with LAAC, LABA, or a combination of the 2.We conducted this population-based study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (1997-2008), identifying COPD patients and their prescribed medication from the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes 490-492 or 496. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases over the 11-year period after treatment with LAAC or LABA only or in combination.Of the 596 COPD patients (mean age 70 y), 196 were treated with LAAC, 318 with LABA, and 82 were treated with a combination. The overall incidence of stroke (8.53%) significantly increased in the combination group compared with LAAC (2.04%) or LABA (1.26%) only. In the Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio over the 11-year survey period for stroke in patients treated with the combination compared with LABA only was 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.99) and for LAAC, it was 0.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.02-2.32).This cohort study using a large health insurance database showed that treating patients with COPD, with a combination of LAAC and LABA, may be associated with an increased hazard of stroke compared with treatment with either agent alone. We should be particularly cautious about comedication of LAAC and LABA in patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholinergic Antagonists; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Stroke; Taiwan; Tiotropium Bromide

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Fractures, Bone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Pneumonia; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

The current study aimed to assess the impact on patient health status during an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). A total of 421 COPD patients were enrolled in a multicentre, single-arm study with a 6-month observational follow-up period. Patients received two inhalations of Symbicort 200 Turbuhaler(R) twice a day. Patients were assessed before the run-in period, at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Patients were instructed to report a change in respiratory symptoms lasting >24 h. This defined an AECOPD. In addition to the initial call, the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Control Questionnaire (CCQ), Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale and activities of daily living (ADL) were completed at 5-7 and 12-14 days. A group of 176 patients reported at least one AECOPD. Exacerbations were associated with statistically significant mean changes (worsening) in the SGRQ activity and impact domains at onset (mean +/- sd 12.1 +/- 18.1 and 14.0 +/- 15.2), during the first (9.8 +/- 19.0 and 9.4 +/- 16.6) and second weeks (3.1 +/- 15.5 and 3.3 +/- 14.7). Clinically significant deterioration in SGRQ impact scores was shown in 71% of patients following early identification, with 55 and 37% during the first and second weeks of an AECOPD, respectively. Acute exacerbation severely impacts on health status. The current study provides valuable information on the change in health status during an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that can be utilised for future trials that evaluate therapeutic intervention.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Canada; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Female; Health Status; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome