bryostatin-1 and Sarcoma

bryostatin-1 has been researched along with Sarcoma* in 3 studies

Trials

3 trial(s) available for bryostatin-1 and Sarcoma

ArticleYear
A phase I study of temsirolimus and bryostatin-1 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma.
    The oncologist, 2014, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1, is approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Bryostatin-1 inhibits protein kinase C, a downstream effector of mTOR complex 2. We observed antitumor effects with the combination of temsirolimus and bryostatin-1 in RCC cell lines. METHODS. Four cohorts of patients received weekly bryostatin-1 (20 μg/m²) with temsirolimus (10, 15, 25, or 37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles.. Thirty patients received a total of 138 cycles across four dose levels. Twenty-five patients had RCC (17 clear cell, 7 papillary, and 1 unclassified). Two sarcoma patients with prior cytotoxic therapy experienced dose-limiting toxicity at 15 mg of temsirolimus (grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia). Subsequently, patients with prior cytotoxic therapy were excluded. Two additional dose-limiting toxicities were noted with 37.5 mg of temsirolimus (grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 creatinine elevation). Consequently, the maximum tolerated dose was defined as temsirolimus at 25 mg and bryostatin-1 at 20 μg/m² every 28 days. Of the 25 RCC patients, 3 patients had partial responses that lasted for 14 months, 28 months, and ≥ 80 months, respectively. Partial responses were seen in both clear cell and papillary histology.. This combination of 37.5 mg of temsirolimus with 20 μg/m² of bryostatin-1 was reasonably safe and well tolerated. Durable responses were observed in 3 of 25 patients with RCC.

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bryostatins; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1; Multiprotein Complexes; Protein Kinase C; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Sarcoma; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome

2014
Phase II studies of bryostatin-1 in patients with advanced sarcoma and advanced head and neck cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2001, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Bryostatin 1 is a marine derived macrolactone with antineoplastic activity modulated through protein kinase C, and with good activity in in vitro and in vivo models. There are few drugs that offer palliation for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and head and neck cancer, and drugs with new mechanisms of action warrant detailed disease specific study.. Two phase II studies for patients with incurable soft tissue sarcoma (12), or head and neck cancer (12) were conducted. Patients were treated with bryostatin, 120 mg/m2/72 hours every 2 weeks for 3 cycles prior to re-evaluation. Most patients had received prior chemotherapy.. No patients had objective responses to therapy. Six patients had brief periods of disease stabilization. Toxicity was generally mild, with myalgia being prominent (n=8). Hyponatremia, not previously described, occurred in 5 patients. The mechanism of this toxicity was unclear.. Bryosytatin 1 given as a single agent for advanced adult soft tissue sarcoma and head and neck cancer is inactive. Myalgia and hyponatremia were the predominant toxicities.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Bryostatins; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Lactones; Macrolides; Male; Middle Aged; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome

2001
A phase I study of intravenous bryostatin 1 in patients with advanced cancer.
    British journal of cancer, 1993, Volume: 68, Issue:2

    Bryostatin 1 is a novel antitumour agent derived from Bugula neritina of the marine phylum Ectoprocta. Nineteen patients with advanced solid tumours were entered into a phase I study to evaluate the toxicity and biological effects of bryostatin 1. Bryostatin 1 was given as a one hour intravenous infusion at the beginning of each 2 week treatment cycle. A maximum of three treatment cycles were given. Doses were escalated in steps from 5 to 65 micrograms m-2 in successive patient groups. The maximum tolerated dose was 50 micrograms m-2. Myalgia was the dose limiting toxicity and was of WHO grade 3 in all three patients treated at 65 micrograms m-2. Flu-like symptoms were common but were of maximum WHO grade 2. Hypotension, of maximum WHO grade 1, occurred in six patients treated at doses up to and including 20 micrograms m-2 and may not have been attributable to treatment with bryostatin 1. Cellulitis and thrombophlebitis occurred at the bryostatin 1 infusion site of patients treated at all dose levels up to 50 micrograms m-2, attributable to the 60% ethanol diluent in the bryostatin 1 infusion. Subsequent patients treated at 50 and 65 micrograms m-2 received treatment with an intravenous normal saline flush and they did not develop these complications. Significant decreases of the platelet count and total leucocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were seen in the first 24 h after treatment at the dose of 65 micrograms m-2. Immediate decreases in haemoglobin of up to 1.9g dl-1 were also noted in patients treated with 65 micrograms m-2, in the absence of clinical evidence of bleeding or haemodynamic compromise. No effect was observed on the incidence of haemopoietic progenitor cells in the marrow. Some patients' neutrophils demonstrated enhanced superoxide radical formation in response to in vitro stimulation with opsonised zymosan (a bacterial polysaccharide) but in the absence of this additional stimulus, no bryostatin 1 effect was observed. Lymphocyte natural killing activity was decreased 2 h after treatment with bryostatin 1, but the effect was not consistently seen 24 h or 7 days later. With the dose schedule examined no antitumour effects were observed. We recommend that bryostatin 1 is used at a dose of 35 to 50 micrograms m-2 two weekly in phase II studies in patients with malignancies including lymphoma, leukaemia, melanoma or hypernephroma, for which pre-clinical investigations suggest antitumour activity.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow; Bryostatins; Colonic Neoplasms; Colony-Forming Units Assay; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Killer Cells, Natural; Lactones; Leukocytes; Macrolides; Mesothelioma; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutrophils; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phagocytosis; Sarcoma

1993