Page last updated: 2024-10-16

bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic

bromide has been researched along with Airflow Obstruction, Chronic in 8 studies

Bromides: Salts of hydrobromic acid, HBr, with the bromine atom in the 1- oxidation state. (From McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Population pharmacokinetic methods were used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate (FF), umeclidinium (UMEC), and vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered as a fixed-dose combination via a single closed inhaler."2.94Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. ( Birk, R; Farrell, C; Hayes, S; Lipson, DA; Mehta, R; Okour, M, 2020)
"Thirteen COPD patients were randomly assigned to receive a 2-week course of TW and normal saline inhalation in a cross-over, single-blind study design."2.75Effects of inhalation of thermal water on exhaled breath condensate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Ferrazzoni, S; Guarnieri, G; Lalli, A; Maestrelli, P; Scarpa, MC, 2010)
"People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have poor quality of life, reduced survival, and accelerated decline in lung function, especially associated with acute exacerbations, leading to high healthcare costs."2.55Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). ( Htet, A; Moe, S; Ni, H, 2017)
"The 1st group included 22 COPD patients with a content of eosinophils in the peripheral blood of 300 cells/ml, the 2nd group included 24 COPD patients with no signs of eosinophilic inflammation in the peripheral blood."1.72[Experience of using a triple fixed combination in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. ( Bolotova, EV; Dudnikova, AV; Shulzhenko, LV, 2022)
"In both groups, CHD and COPD were treated by the generally accepted standards, Group I patients were additionally given IBB at a water temperature of 37 degrees C; the concentration of iodine and bromine was 10-15 and 30-40 m/I, respectively; the duration was 10-15 min for 2 consecutive days, followed by a rest day or every second day; the course comprised 10-12 sessions."1.36[The clinical efficiency and safety of iodide-bromine balneotherapy in patients with coronary heart disease concurrent with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. ( Zunnunov, ZR, 2010)

Research

Studies (8)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (12.50)29.6817
2010's4 (50.00)24.3611
2020's3 (37.50)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Bolotova, EV1
Dudnikova, AV1
Shulzhenko, LV1
Yang, S1
Lee, LA1
Sule, N1
Fowler, A1
Peachey, G1
Ni, H1
Htet, A1
Moe, S1
Mehta, R1
Farrell, C1
Hayes, S1
Birk, R1
Okour, M1
Lipson, DA1
Matera, MG1
Rogliani, P1
Rinaldi, B1
Cazzola, M1
Guarnieri, G2
Ferrazzoni, S1
Scarpa, MC1
Lalli, A1
Maestrelli, P2
Zunnunov, ZR1
Pellegrini, M1
Fanin, D1
Nowicki, Y1
Bordin, A1
Faggian, D1
Plebani, M1
Saetta, M1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combination of FF/VI, Administered Once-daily Via a Dry Powde[NCT02924688]Phase 32,436 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-13Completed
A Phase IIIB, 24-week Randomised, Double-blind Study to Compare 'Closed' Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) With 'Open' Triple Therapy (FF/VI + UMEC), in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)[NCT02729051]Phase 31,055 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-29Completed
A Phase III, 24 Week, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study (With an Extension to 52 Weeks in a Subset of Subjects) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI Administered Once Da[NCT02345161]Phase 31,811 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-23Completed
A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-d[NCT02164513]Phase 310,355 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Annualized Rate of Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbations

A moderate asthma exacerbation is considered to be a deterioration in asthma symptoms or in lung function, or increased rescue bronchodilator use lasting for at least 2 days or more, but not be severe enough to warrant systemic corticosteroid use (or a doubling or more of the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose, if applicable) for 3 days or more and/or hospitalization. It is an event that, when recognized, should result in a temporary change in treatment, to prevent it from becoming severe. A severe asthma exacerbation is defined as the deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets,suspension or injection), or an increase from a stable maintenance dose (For participants receiving maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose for at least 3 days is required), for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency department visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per year (Mean)
FF/VI0.70
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)0.68
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)0.61

Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) Total Score at Week 24

The ACQ-7 consists of 7 attributes of asthma control, of which 6 to be self-completed by participant in a 6-item questionnaire, enquire about frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week on: nocturnal awakening, symptoms on waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze, and rescue medication use. The seventh attribute measures the lung function, which was included via pre-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted value. All 7 items of ACQ have response on 0-6 ordinal scale (0=no impairment/limitation, 6=total impairment/limitation). The total score is calculated as the average of all non-missing item responses, ranges from 0 to 6. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose,Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at Week 24 minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-0.678
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-0.734
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-0.767

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic FEV1 at 3 Hours Post Study Treatment at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 (recorded at 3 hours post dose) minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and 3 hours post dose at Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0.132
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.220
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.243
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.168
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.256
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.286

Mean Change From Baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score Over Weeks 21 to 24 (Inclusive) of the Treatment Period

The E-RS in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) consists of 11 items. E-RS captures information related to respiratory symptoms, i.e. breathlessness, cough, sputum production, chest congestion and chest tightness. The E-RS was completed daily and data was derived by 4-weekly intervals, requiring at least 50% of data to be present during a period. 7 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extreme) and 4 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extreme). The E-RS total score was calculated by taking sum of all the items. The E-RS total score has a scoring range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe respiratory symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was the mean value of 14 days prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-baseline value (mean of daily E-RS total scores during Week 21 to 24 ) minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (14 days prior to randomization) and Weeks 21 to 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-2.47
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-2.60
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-2.89

Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24

Pulse Rate was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionBeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg-1.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.2
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg-1.0
FF/VI 200/25 mcg-0.7
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg-1.3
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg-0.5

Mean Change From Baseline in Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24

The SGRQ had 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure quality of life (QoL) of participants with airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. The questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant with a recall over the past 3 months. SGRQ total score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100. SGRQ total score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health. A change of 4 points is considered a clinically relevant change. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI-11.39
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg)-10.29
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg)-11.69

Mean Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on treatment is defined as the highest FEV1 value obtained prior to the morning dose of investigational product. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error, who did not receive the study drug. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. Mixed Model Repeated Measures(MMRM) was used. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

InterventionLiters (Least Squares Mean)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0.024
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.120
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0.134
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.076
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.157
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.168

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Twelve-lead ECGs were performed during the study using an automated ECG machine. All ECG measurements were made with the participant in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. The number of participants with worst case post-Baseline abnormal ECG findings were reported. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FF/VI 100/25 mcg115
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg118
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg109
FF/VI 200/25 mcg109
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg106
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg108

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 24

Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0.60.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg1.11.3
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0.80.2
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0.90.8
FF/VI 100/25 mcg1.60.4
FF/VI 200/25 mcg0.20.4

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Values

Blood samples were collected for assessment of clinical chemistry parameters, which included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, protein, sodium and urea. Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albumin, lowAlbumin, highALT, lowALT, highAST, lowAST, highALP, lowALP, highDirect bilirubin, lowDirect bilirubin, highBilirubin, lowBilirubin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highCreatinine, lowCreatinine, highGlucose, lowGlucose, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highProtein, lowProtein, highSodium, lowSodium, highUrea, lowUrea, high
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg060290270150101291262711713130177417
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0502401401000057104981170111533753
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg03027023116020174860912667121375311
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg0103001601201013376487736192137113
FF/VI 100/25 mcg2104102912101094454715742153056313
FF/VI 200/25 mcg1202802101202015711636776793254311

Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Values

Blood samples were collected for assessment of hematology parameters, which included Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Platelets, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) and Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV). Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Basophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Basophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Eosinophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Eosinophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Lymphocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Lymphocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Monocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Monocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Neutrophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Neutrophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396Erythrocytes, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Erythrocytes, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hematocrit, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hematocrit, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hemoglobin, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Hemoglobin, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397Leukocytes, low, n=391,390,391,389,391,396Leukocytes, high, n=391,390,391,389,391,396Platelets, low, n=391,388,389,391,388,396Platelets, high, n=391,388,389,391,388,396MCH, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCH, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCV, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397MCV, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg0027841156811020162128524713122921647322241
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg0025102131574161511131650408142031924221025
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg0032851365171215211720493710122651941251926
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg00287810663493422172649341384042125321437
FF/VI 100/25 mcg0126111132607142114242160321493841740182029
FF/VI 200/25 mcg00318487642101915122047401793142134171529

Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Common (>=3%) Non-SAE

Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function, or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE. Number of participants with any SAE and common (>=3%) non-SAEs are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Common non-SAESAE
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg15018
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg13523
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg12723
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg12221
FF/VI 100/25 mcg13625
FF/VI 200/25 mcg12221

Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score at Week 24

SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on HRQoL of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Analysis was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of Baseline SGRQ Total score, stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), visit, geographical region, treatment, visit by treatment and visit by Baseline interaction. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25-5.841
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5-4.935

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. It was measured using centralized spirometry. FEV1 values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population was used which comprised of all participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, who do not have a full protocol deviation considered to impact efficacy. Data following a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation or pneumonia was excluded from analysis due to the potential impact of the exacerbation or the medications used to treat it. Participants with partial protocol deviations considered to impact efficacy were included in the mPP Population but had their data excluded from analysis from the time of deviation onwards. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/250.113
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.50.095

Percentage of Responders Based on the Saint (St) George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 24

SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Response was defined as an SGRQ total score of >=4 units below Baseline. Non response was defined as a SGRQ total score <4 units below Baseline or a missing SGRQ total score with no subsequent on treatment scores. ITT Population comprised of randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. A participant screened or run-in failure and also randomized was considered to be randomized in error. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/2550
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.551

Percentage of Responders Based on Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 24

The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. A participant was considered as a responder if the on-treatment TDI focal score was at least 1 unit at that visit. Non-response was defined as a TDI focal score of less than 1 unit or a missing TDI focal score with no subsequent non-missing on-treatment scores. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/2556
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.556

TDI Focal Score at Week 24

The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnoea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/252.029
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.51.892

Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation

COPD exacerbations were identified based on the investigator's clinical judgment. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics were considered as moderate exacerbation. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with in-subject hospitalization was considered as severe exacerbation. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) is from a Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe exacerbations, prior year), smoking status (screening), stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), geographical region and percent predicted FEV1 at Baseline. Median and inter-quartile range (first and third quartile) have been presented. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Up to 25 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25NA
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5NA

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24

A single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionBeats per minute (Bpm) (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.1
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.2

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 52

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionBpm (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.2
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.0

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24

Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionBpm (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.5
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.8

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52

Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 52 were summarized and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionBpm (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.7
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.9

Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) at Week 24

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionMsec (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.5
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.7

Change From Baseline in QTcB at Week 52

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 52. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMsec (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.9
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg2.2

Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; SGRQ) Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 24

The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-6.6
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-4.3

Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD; SGRQ Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 52

The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-4.6
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.9

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. ITT Population comprised of all randomized subjects excluding those who were randomized in error. Only participants with analyzable data at the given time point were analyzed. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionLiters (L) (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.142
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.029

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 52

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 52 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Extension Population: all participants in the ITT Population who were enrolled into the subset of participants with extension to 52 weeks. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionLiters (L) (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.126
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.053

Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 24

Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as part of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg)0.0
Budesonide/Formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg)-0.1

Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 52

Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as aprt of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of days (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.0
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.3

Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 24

The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.22
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.34

Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 52

The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.20
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.36

Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Extension Part of the Study

All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray AND at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated WBC (>10,000/mm3 or >15 percent immature forms) orr Hypoxemia (HbO2 saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg4
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg4

Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Treatment Period

All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray and at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated white blood cells (WBC) (>10,000/millimeter [mm^3] or >15 percent immature forms) or Hypoxemia (hemoglobin/oxygen [HbO2] saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg20
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg7

Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Week 24

The 24-hour holter measurements were obtained at Screening and 24 hours prior to Week 24 (Visits 1 and 6). The number of participants with clinically significant change (abnormal) were reported. Holter Monitoring Population: all participants in the ITT Population who had at least one holter monitoring evaluation. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Overall Study Arm180
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg165

Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Extension Part of the Study

To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1

Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Treatment Period

To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg4
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg6

Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 24

The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Week 4 and Week 24. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2.29
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.72

Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 52

The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Weeks 4, 24 and 52. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.74
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.39

Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)-RS Scores up to Week 24

The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1-4, n=870,859Week 5-8, n=851,830Week 9-12, n=841,813Week 13-16, n=831,802Week 17-20, n=828,788Week 21-24, n=825,783Breathlessness score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Breathlessness score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Breathlessness score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Breathlessness score, Week 13-16, n=831, 802Breathlessness score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Breathlessness score, Week 21-24, n=825,783Cough, sputum score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Cough, sputum score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Cough, sputum score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Cough, sputum score, Week 13-16, n=831,802Cough, sputum score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Cough, sputum score, Week 21-24, n=825,783Chest score, Week 1-4, n=870,859Chest score, Week 5-8, n=851,830Chest score, Week 9-12, n=841,813Chest score, Week 13-16, n=831,802Chest score, Week 17-20, n=828,788Chest score, Week 21-24, n=825,783
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.50-0.77-1.05-1.09-1.02-0.96-0.20-0.26-0.34-0.36-0.31-0.30-0.24-0.39-0.50-0.53-0.53-0.50-0.06-0.12-0.20-0.20-0.17-0.17
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.45-2.00-2.23-2.42-2.43-2.31-0.71-0.95-1.03-1.11-1.10-1.07-0.41-0.59-0.67-0.74-0.77-0.72-0.33-0.46-0.54-0.58-0.57-0.53

Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean EXACT-RS Scores up to Week 52

The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1-4, n=205, 213Week 5-8, n=203, 208Week 9-12, n=201, 206Week 13-16, n=201, 204Week 17-20, n=201, 199Week 21-24, n=202, 197Week 25-28, n=194, 186Week 29-32, n=192, 181Week 33-36, n=187, 180Week 37-40, n=185, 177Week 41-44, n=180, 174Week 45-48, n=180, 173EXACT-RS Scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Breathlessness scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Breathlessness scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Breathlessness scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Breathlessness scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Breathlessness scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Breathlessness scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Breathlessness scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Breathlessness scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Breathlessness scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Breathlessness scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Breathlessness scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Breathlessness scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Breathlessness scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Cough and sputum scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Cough and sputum scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Cough and sputum scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Cough and sputum scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Cough and sputum scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Cough and sputum scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Cough and sputum scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Cough and sputum scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Cough and sputum scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Cough and sputum scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Cough and sputum scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Cough and sputum scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Cough and sputum scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171Chest scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213Chest scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208Chest scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206Chest scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204Chest scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199Chest scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197Chest scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186Chest scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181Chest scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180Chest scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177Chest scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174Chest scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173Chest scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.72-0.90-1.21-1.52-1.53-1.52-1.16-0.90-0.62-1.11-0.81-0.64-0.61-0.31-0.32-0.44-0.57-0.50-0.50-0.38-0.26-0.14-0.37-0.24-0.11-0.08-0.32-0.44-0.52-0.62-0.73-0.71-0.57-0.48-0.40-0.54-0.41-0.39-0.44-0.09-0.13-0.24-0.31-0.29-0.30-0.21-0.16-0.08-0.20-0.16-0.13-0.08
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.24-1.97-2.18-2.53-2.64-2.63-2.48-2.33-2.12-2.34-2.30-2.17-2.03-0.64-0.93-1.05-1.19-1.17-1.13-1.14-1.11-1.08-1.13-1.06-0.97-0.96-0.34-0.59-0.63-0.73-0.83-0.83-0.73-0.68-0.56-0.65-0.66-0.66-0.61-0.27-0.46-0.51-0.61-0.67-0.68-0.63-0.55-0.48-0.57-0.58-0.57-0.49

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Aminotransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionInternational units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
Week 24, ALT, n=838,785Maximum post BL, ALT, n=887,864Week 24, AST, n=835,785Maximum post BL, AST, n=887,866Week 24, ALP, n=839,787Maximum post BL, ALP, n=888,866Week 24, GGT, n=839,787Maximum post BL, GGT, n=888,866Week 24, Creatine Kinase, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg3.85.54.05.6-2.80.80.54.7-3.420.6
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.43.01.13.21.14.33.47.5-3.920.6

Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). The maximum post BL values have been presented. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 24, Albumin, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Albumin, n=888,866Week 24, Protein, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Protein, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.50.2-1.00.1
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.70.1-0.60.4

Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 52, Albumin, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Albumin, n=207,214Week 52, Protein, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Protein, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.70.2-1.60.0
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.80.4-1.10.6

Change From Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, and Creatine Kinase at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionInternational units per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
Week 52, ALT, n=181,173Maximum post BL, ALT, n=207,212Week 52, AST, n=180,174Maximum post BL, AST, n=207,214Week 52, ALP, n=181,174Maximum post BL, ALP, n=207,214Week 52, GGT, n=181,174Maximum post BL, GGT, n=207,214Week 52, Creatine Kinase, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg1.34.50.83.7-2.71.20.28.916.746.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.75.41.75.51.76.70.27.76.139.9

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 24

Hematology laboratory assessments included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a repeat test). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Intervention10^9 cells/Liter(L) (Mean)
Week 24, Basophils, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=876,853Week 24, Eosinophils, n=817, 761Maxmium post BL, Eosinophils, n=876,853Category title 5. Week 24, Monocytes, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=876,853Week 24, Neutrophils, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=876,853Week 24, Leukocytes, n=819,761Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=877,853Week 24, Platelets, n=810,759Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=871,846Week 24, Lymphocytes, n=817,761Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=876,853
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0010.005-0.0150.0190.0040.0480.1420.6490.110.64-0.710.2-0.0230.150
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0010.005-0.0080.034-0.0060.0400.0710.4810.060.52-0.710.80.0020.187

Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 52

Hematology laboratory assessments included Basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes,neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
Week 52, Basophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=205,212Week 52, Eosinophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Eosinophils, n=205,212Week 52, Monocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=205,212Week 52, Neutrophils, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=205,212Week 52, Leukocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=205,212Week 52, Platelets, n=170,166Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=203,210Week 52, Lymphocytes, n=168,166Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=202,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.0030.010-0.0110.0570.0280.072-0.1630.835-0.170.87-2.713.9-0.0270.295
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.0020.0110.0020.0740.0250.0750.2460.9230.330.97-1.813.60.0600.325

Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Week 24, Bilirubin, n=839,786Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=888,865Week 24, Creatinine, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=888,866Week 24, Urate, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Urate, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.11.21.143.991.721.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.21.11.054.122.823.7

Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 of the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (Mean)
Week 52, Bilirubin, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=207,214Week 52, Creatinine, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=207,214Week 52, Urate, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Urate, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.12.31.286.003.940.0
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.32.02.956.993.642.0

Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) and PR Interval at Week 24

A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF, n=840,787PR, n=812,766
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.60.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2.5-0.1

Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 24

Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
Intervention10^12 cells/L (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.040.04
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.020.06

Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 52

Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Intervention10^12 cells/L (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.000.07
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.020.11

Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 24, Calcium, n=835,785Maximum post BL, Calcium, n=887,866Week 24, Chloride, n=838,787Maximum post BL, Chloride, n=888,866Week 24, CO2, n=835,785Maximum post BL, CO2, n=835,785Week 24, Glucose, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Glucose, n=887,866Week 24, Potassium, n=834,785Maximum post BL, Potassium, n=887,866Week 24, Phosphate, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Phosphate, n=888,866Week 24, Sodium, n=837,787Maximum post BL, Sodium, n=888,866Week 24, Urea, n=839,787Maximum post BL, Urea, n=888,866
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0140.012-0.70.6-0.00.5-0.000.37-0.030.13-0.0290.043-0.20.70.040.64
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0160.013-0.40.9-0.60.00.120.530.040.18-0.0280.039-0.30.60.080.68

Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, CO2, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, magnesium, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMmol/L (Mean)
Week 52, Calcium, n=180,174Maximum post BL,Calcium, n=207,214Week 52, Chloride, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Chloride, n=207,214Week 52, CO2, n=180,174Maximum post BL,CO2, n=207,214Week 52, Glucose, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Glucose, n=207,214Week 52, Potassium, n=180,174Maximum post BL,Potassium, n=207,214Week 52, Phosphate, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Phosphate, n=207,214Week 52, Sodium, n=181,174Maximum post BL,Sodium, n=207,214Week 52, Urea, n=181,174Maximum post BL, Urea, n=207,214
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.0400.008-0.21.3-1.00.30.220.63-0.100.200.0050.110-0.11.10.121.08
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.0330.026-0.11.4-1.2-0.20.310.92-0.020.29-0.0030.109-0.21.10.161.06

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionFraction of 1 (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.00240.0123
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg0.00240.0115

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionFraction of 1 (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-0.00560.0149
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.00560.0153

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionGrams per liter (g/L) (Mean)
Week 24, n=822,769Maximum post BL, n=880,857
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.01.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-0.91.5

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 52

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventiong/L (Mean)
Week 52, n=174,170Maximum post BL, n=206,212
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-2.51.9
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-2.52.2

Change From Baseline in QTcF and PR Interval at Week 52

Single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionMsec (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF, n=181,169PR, n=174,160
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg2.41.4
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg1.41.6

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 24

Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were collected taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg-1.1-0.5
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.0-0.3

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 52

Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 52 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg0.30.4
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg-1.3-0.4

Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Treatment Period

Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, Candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Oral candidiasisCandida infectionOral fungal infectionOropharyngeal candidiasis
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg4430
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg2122

Number of Participants Reporting an AESI of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Extension Part of the Study

Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Candida infectionOral fungal infection
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg32
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg00

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Treatment Period

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg33951
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg35449

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment AE/SAEs in the Extension Part of the Study

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg12228
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg10021

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Cardiovascular (CV) Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Treatment Period

Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction]. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any MACE, Narrow definitionAny MACE, Broad definition
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg711
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg412

Number of Participants With Any On-treatment CV Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Extension Part of the Study

Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction] (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any MACE, Narrow definitionAny MACE, Broad definition
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg25
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg57

Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI

The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations which occurred during treatment was assessed. Moderate exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Analysis performed using a generalized linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution. ITT population was used which comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI0.91
FF/VI1.07
UMEC/VI1.21

Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Participants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter

The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, for participants with blood eosinophil count >=150 cells per microliter , has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non-missing eosinophil, at Baseline were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI0.95
UMEC/VI1.39

Annual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI

The annual rate of severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, has been reported. Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (<=1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening) were used. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionExacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI0.13
FF/VI0.15
UMEC/VI0.19

Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI

SGRQ is a disease specific-questionnaire, designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). SGRQ contains 14 questions with total of 40 items grouped into three domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts). The overall summary score along with scores for the individual domains of symptoms, activity and impacts were assessed. Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by sum of maximum weights for items in SGRQ. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. A decrease in score indicates improvement in HRQoL and higher score implies worse quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionScores on SGRQ scale (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI-5.5
FF/VI-3.7

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI

FEV1 was defined as the amount of air a person exhales in one second. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value of FEV1 at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline for trough FEV1 was defined as Day 1 (Pre-dose). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed using a Repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (Screening), geographical region, visit, Baseline, Baseline by visit and treatment group by visit interactions. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionLiter (Least Squares Mean)
FF/UMEC/VI0.094
FF/VI-0.003

Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI

This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (<=1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening), have been reported. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If <25% (and <50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,,
InterventionDays (Number)
First quartile time to onsetMedian time to onset
FF/UMEC/VI112NA
FF/VI81NA
UMEC/VI73306

Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at Baseline

This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations for participants with blood eosinophil count >=150 cells per microliter, at Baseline has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non missing eosinophils at Baseline were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If <25% (and <50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

,
InterventionDays (Number)
First quartile time to onsetMedian time to onset
FF/UMEC/VI107NA
UMEC/VI55253

Reviews

2 reviews available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic

ArticleYear
Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017, Jun-20, Volume: 6

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bromides; Disease Progression; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Hospitalizat

2017
Umeclidinium bromide + vilanterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Expert review of clinical pharmacology, 2015, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-B

2015

Trials

4 trials available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic

ArticleYear
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium Bromide, and Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma, Using Data from a Phase IIIA Study (CAPTAIN).
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021, Volume: 60, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chlorobenzenes; Doubl

2021
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro

2020
Effects of inhalation of thermal water on exhaled breath condensate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2010, Volume: 79, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Fluids; Breath Tests; Bromides; Cross-Over

2010
Effect of inhalation of thermal water on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Respiratory medicine, 2005, Volume: 99, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Bromides; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Exercise Test; Female;

2005

Other Studies

2 other studies available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic

ArticleYear
[Experience of using a triple fixed combination in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
    Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2022, Mar-15, Volume: 94, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug C

2022
[The clinical efficiency and safety of iodide-bromine balneotherapy in patients with coronary heart disease concurrent with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
    Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2010, Volume: 82, Issue:1

    Topics: Baths; Bromides; Coronary Disease; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human

2010