bromide has been researched along with Airflow Obstruction, Chronic in 8 studies
Bromides: Salts of hydrobromic acid, HBr, with the bromine atom in the 1- oxidation state. (From McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed)
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Population pharmacokinetic methods were used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate (FF), umeclidinium (UMEC), and vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered as a fixed-dose combination via a single closed inhaler." | 2.94 | Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. ( Birk, R; Farrell, C; Hayes, S; Lipson, DA; Mehta, R; Okour, M, 2020) |
"Thirteen COPD patients were randomly assigned to receive a 2-week course of TW and normal saline inhalation in a cross-over, single-blind study design." | 2.75 | Effects of inhalation of thermal water on exhaled breath condensate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ( Ferrazzoni, S; Guarnieri, G; Lalli, A; Maestrelli, P; Scarpa, MC, 2010) |
"People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have poor quality of life, reduced survival, and accelerated decline in lung function, especially associated with acute exacerbations, leading to high healthcare costs." | 2.55 | Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). ( Htet, A; Moe, S; Ni, H, 2017) |
"The 1st group included 22 COPD patients with a content of eosinophils in the peripheral blood of 300 cells/ml, the 2nd group included 24 COPD patients with no signs of eosinophilic inflammation in the peripheral blood." | 1.72 | [Experience of using a triple fixed combination in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. ( Bolotova, EV; Dudnikova, AV; Shulzhenko, LV, 2022) |
"In both groups, CHD and COPD were treated by the generally accepted standards, Group I patients were additionally given IBB at a water temperature of 37 degrees C; the concentration of iodine and bromine was 10-15 and 30-40 m/I, respectively; the duration was 10-15 min for 2 consecutive days, followed by a rest day or every second day; the course comprised 10-12 sessions." | 1.36 | [The clinical efficiency and safety of iodide-bromine balneotherapy in patients with coronary heart disease concurrent with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. ( Zunnunov, ZR, 2010) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (12.50) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (50.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (37.50) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Bolotova, EV | 1 |
Dudnikova, AV | 1 |
Shulzhenko, LV | 1 |
Yang, S | 1 |
Lee, LA | 1 |
Sule, N | 1 |
Fowler, A | 1 |
Peachey, G | 1 |
Ni, H | 1 |
Htet, A | 1 |
Moe, S | 1 |
Mehta, R | 1 |
Farrell, C | 1 |
Hayes, S | 1 |
Birk, R | 1 |
Okour, M | 1 |
Lipson, DA | 1 |
Matera, MG | 1 |
Rogliani, P | 1 |
Rinaldi, B | 1 |
Cazzola, M | 1 |
Guarnieri, G | 2 |
Ferrazzoni, S | 1 |
Scarpa, MC | 1 |
Lalli, A | 1 |
Maestrelli, P | 2 |
Zunnunov, ZR | 1 |
Pellegrini, M | 1 |
Fanin, D | 1 |
Nowicki, Y | 1 |
Bordin, A | 1 |
Faggian, D | 1 |
Plebani, M | 1 |
Saetta, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combination of FF/VI, Administered Once-daily Via a Dry Powde[NCT02924688] | Phase 3 | 2,436 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-10-13 | Completed | ||
A Phase IIIB, 24-week Randomised, Double-blind Study to Compare 'Closed' Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) With 'Open' Triple Therapy (FF/VI + UMEC), in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)[NCT02729051] | Phase 3 | 1,055 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-06-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, 24 Week, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study (With an Extension to 52 Weeks in a Subset of Subjects) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI Administered Once Da[NCT02345161] | Phase 3 | 1,811 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-01-23 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-d[NCT02164513] | Phase 3 | 10,355 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-06-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
A moderate asthma exacerbation is considered to be a deterioration in asthma symptoms or in lung function, or increased rescue bronchodilator use lasting for at least 2 days or more, but not be severe enough to warrant systemic corticosteroid use (or a doubling or more of the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose, if applicable) for 3 days or more and/or hospitalization. It is an event that, when recognized, should result in a temporary change in treatment, to prevent it from becoming severe. A severe asthma exacerbation is defined as the deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets,suspension or injection), or an increase from a stable maintenance dose (For participants receiving maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose for at least 3 days is required), for at least 3 days or an inpatient hospitalization or emergency department visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Exacerbations per year (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI | 0.70 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg) | 0.68 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg) | 0.61 |
The ACQ-7 consists of 7 attributes of asthma control, of which 6 to be self-completed by participant in a 6-item questionnaire, enquire about frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week on: nocturnal awakening, symptoms on waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze, and rescue medication use. The seventh attribute measures the lung function, which was included via pre-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted value. All 7 items of ACQ have response on 0-6 ordinal scale (0=no impairment/limitation, 6=total impairment/limitation). The total score is calculated as the average of all non-missing item responses, ranges from 0 to 6. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose,Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at Week 24 minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI | -0.678 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg) | -0.734 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg) | -0.767 |
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 (recorded at 3 hours post dose) minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and 3 hours post dose at Week 24
Intervention | Liters (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 0.132 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.220 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 0.243 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 0.168 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.256 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 0.286 |
The E-RS in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) consists of 11 items. E-RS captures information related to respiratory symptoms, i.e. breathlessness, cough, sputum production, chest congestion and chest tightness. The E-RS was completed daily and data was derived by 4-weekly intervals, requiring at least 50% of data to be present during a period. 7 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extreme) and 4 items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extreme). The E-RS total score was calculated by taking sum of all the items. The E-RS total score has a scoring range of 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe respiratory symptoms. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was the mean value of 14 days prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-baseline value (mean of daily E-RS total scores during Week 21 to 24 ) minus Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (14 days prior to randomization) and Weeks 21 to 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI | -2.47 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg) | -2.60 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg) | -2.89 |
Pulse Rate was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24
Intervention | Beats per minute (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | -1.1 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.2 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | -1.0 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | -0.7 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | -1.3 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | -0.5 |
The SGRQ had 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure quality of life (QoL) of participants with airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. The questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant with a recall over the past 3 months. SGRQ total score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100. SGRQ total score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health. A change of 4 points is considered a clinically relevant change. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Baseline value was at randomization visit (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI | -11.39 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 31.25 mcg) | -10.29 |
FF/UMEC/VI (UMEC 62.5 mcg) | -11.69 |
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 on treatment is defined as the highest FEV1 value obtained prior to the morning dose of investigational product. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable pre-dose FEV1 prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error, who did not receive the study drug. Treatment policy estimand was assessed, including all on- and post-treatment data. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. Mixed Model Repeated Measures(MMRM) was used. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24
Intervention | Liters (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 0.024 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.120 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 0.134 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 0.076 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.157 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 0.168 |
Twelve-lead ECGs were performed during the study using an automated ECG machine. All ECG measurements were made with the participant in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. The number of participants with worst case post-Baseline abnormal ECG findings were reported. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 115 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 118 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 109 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 109 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 106 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 108 |
Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was measured in the sitting position after approximately 5 minutes rest. Baseline value is the last acceptable/borderline acceptable value prior to randomized treatment start date (pre-dose at Day 1). Change from Baseline value is the value at the clinic visit minus the Baseline value. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in ITT Population without missing covariate information, with Baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-dose at Day 1) and Week 24
Intervention | Millimeter of mercury (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SBP | DBP | |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.6 | 0.1 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 1.1 | 1.3 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0.8 | 0.2 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 0.9 | 0.8 |
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 1.6 | 0.4 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Blood samples were collected for assessment of clinical chemistry parameters, which included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, protein, sodium and urea. Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albumin, low | Albumin, high | ALT, low | ALT, high | AST, low | AST, high | ALP, low | ALP, high | Direct bilirubin, low | Direct bilirubin, high | Bilirubin, low | Bilirubin, high | Calcium, low | Calcium, high | Creatinine, low | Creatinine, high | Glucose, low | Glucose, high | Potassium, low | Potassium, high | Protein, low | Protein, high | Sodium, low | Sodium, high | Urea, low | Urea, high | |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 62 | 7 | 11 | 71 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 17 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 0 | 5 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 49 | 8 | 11 | 70 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0 | 3 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 60 | 9 | 12 | 66 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 0 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 64 | 8 | 7 | 73 | 6 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 13 |
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 2 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 29 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 54 | 7 | 15 | 74 | 2 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 13 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 1 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 63 | 6 | 7 | 76 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
Blood samples were collected for assessment of hematology parameters, which included Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Platelets, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) and Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV). Abnormal laboratory results are categorized as high or low with respect to their normal ranges. Participants having High and Low values from normal ranges for any parameter at any time post-baseline visits are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Basophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Eosinophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Eosinophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Lymphocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Lymphocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Monocytes, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Monocytes, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Neutrophils, low, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Neutrophils, high, n=390,390,391,389,389,396 | Erythrocytes, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Erythrocytes, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Hematocrit, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Hematocrit, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Hemoglobin, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Hemoglobin, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | Leukocytes, low, n=391,390,391,389,391,396 | Leukocytes, high, n=391,390,391,389,391,396 | Platelets, low, n=391,388,389,391,388,396 | Platelets, high, n=391,388,389,391,388,396 | MCH, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | MCH, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | MCV, low, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | MCV, high, n=391,390,392,391,391,397 | |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0 | 0 | 27 | 84 | 11 | 5 | 68 | 1 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 21 | 28 | 52 | 47 | 13 | 12 | 29 | 2 | 16 | 47 | 32 | 22 | 41 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 0 | 0 | 25 | 102 | 13 | 1 | 57 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 50 | 40 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 3 | 19 | 24 | 22 | 10 | 25 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 0 | 0 | 32 | 85 | 13 | 6 | 51 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 21 | 17 | 20 | 49 | 37 | 10 | 12 | 26 | 5 | 19 | 41 | 25 | 19 | 26 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 0 | 0 | 28 | 78 | 10 | 6 | 63 | 4 | 9 | 34 | 22 | 17 | 26 | 49 | 34 | 13 | 8 | 40 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 32 | 14 | 37 |
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 0 | 1 | 26 | 111 | 13 | 2 | 60 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 14 | 24 | 21 | 60 | 32 | 14 | 9 | 38 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 18 | 20 | 29 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 0 | 0 | 31 | 84 | 8 | 7 | 64 | 2 | 10 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 20 | 47 | 40 | 17 | 9 | 31 | 4 | 21 | 34 | 17 | 15 | 29 |
Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function, or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE. Number of participants with any SAE and common (>=3%) non-SAEs are presented. (NCT02924688)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Common non-SAE | SAE | |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/ 31.25/25 mcg | 150 | 18 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg | 135 | 23 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/ 31.25/25 mcg | 127 | 23 |
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg | 122 | 21 |
FF/VI 100/25 mcg | 136 | 25 |
FF/VI 200/25 mcg | 122 | 21 |
SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on HRQoL of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Analysis was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of Baseline SGRQ Total score, stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), visit, geographical region, treatment, visit by treatment and visit by Baseline interaction. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | -5.841 |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | -4.935 |
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. It was measured using centralized spirometry. FEV1 values at Week 0, pre-dose were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated time point. Modified Per Protocol (mPP) Population was used which comprised of all participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, who do not have a full protocol deviation considered to impact efficacy. Data following a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation or pneumonia was excluded from analysis due to the potential impact of the exacerbation or the medications used to treat it. Participants with partial protocol deviations considered to impact efficacy were included in the mPP Population but had their data excluded from analysis from the time of deviation onwards. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Liter (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | 0.113 |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | 0.095 |
SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Response was defined as an SGRQ total score of >=4 units below Baseline. Non response was defined as a SGRQ total score <4 units below Baseline or a missing SGRQ total score with no subsequent on treatment scores. ITT Population comprised of randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. A participant screened or run-in failure and also randomized was considered to be randomized in error. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | 50 |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | 51 |
The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. A participant was considered as a responder if the on-treatment TDI focal score was at least 1 unit at that visit. Non-response was defined as a TDI focal score of less than 1 unit or a missing TDI focal score with no subsequent non-missing on-treatment scores. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link function. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | 56 |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | 56 |
The TDI measures changes in the participant's dyspnoea. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6. lower scores indicating more impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | 2.029 |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | 1.892 |
COPD exacerbations were identified based on the investigator's clinical judgment. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics were considered as moderate exacerbation. Worsening symptoms of COPD that required treatment with in-subject hospitalization was considered as severe exacerbation. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) is from a Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe exacerbations, prior year), smoking status (screening), stratum (number of long-acting bronchodilators per day during the run-in: 0/1 or 2), geographical region and percent predicted FEV1 at Baseline. Median and inter-quartile range (first and third quartile) have been presented. (NCT02729051)
Timeframe: Up to 25 weeks
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 | NA |
FF/VI 100/25 + UMEC 62.5 | NA |
A single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Beats per minute (Bpm) (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -1.1 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.2 |
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Bpm (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.2 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.0 |
Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Bpm (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.5 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.8 |
Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 52 were summarized and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Bpm (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.7 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.9 |
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Msec (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 1.5 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.7 |
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 52. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Msec (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.9 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 2.2 |
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -6.6 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -4.3 |
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -4.6 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.9 |
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. ITT Population comprised of all randomized subjects excluding those who were randomized in error. Only participants with analyzable data at the given time point were analyzed. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Liters (L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.142 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.029 |
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 52 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Extension Population: all participants in the ITT Population who were enrolled into the subset of participants with extension to 52 weeks. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Liters (L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.126 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.053 |
Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as part of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of days (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) | 0.0 |
Budesonide/Formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg) | -0.1 |
Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as aprt of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of days (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.0 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.3 |
The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Exacerbations per participant per year (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.22 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.34 |
The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Exacerbations per participant per year (Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.20 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.36 |
All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray AND at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated WBC (>10,000/mm3 or >15 percent immature forms) orr Hypoxemia (HbO2 saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 4 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 4 |
All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray and at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated white blood cells (WBC) (>10,000/millimeter [mm^3] or >15 percent immature forms) or Hypoxemia (hemoglobin/oxygen [HbO2] saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 20 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 7 |
The 24-hour holter measurements were obtained at Screening and 24 hours prior to Week 24 (Visits 1 and 6). The number of participants with clinically significant change (abnormal) were reported. Holter Monitoring Population: all participants in the ITT Population who had at least one holter monitoring evaluation. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Overall Study Arm | 180 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 165 |
To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 1 |
To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 4 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 6 |
The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Week 4 and Week 24. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 2.29 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 1.72 |
The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Weeks 4, 24 and 52. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 1.74 |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 1.39 |
The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1-4, n=870,859 | Week 5-8, n=851,830 | Week 9-12, n=841,813 | Week 13-16, n=831,802 | Week 17-20, n=828,788 | Week 21-24, n=825,783 | Breathlessness score, Week 1-4, n=870,859 | Breathlessness score, Week 5-8, n=851,830 | Breathlessness score, Week 9-12, n=841,813 | Breathlessness score, Week 13-16, n=831, 802 | Breathlessness score, Week 17-20, n=828,788 | Breathlessness score, Week 21-24, n=825,783 | Cough, sputum score, Week 1-4, n=870,859 | Cough, sputum score, Week 5-8, n=851,830 | Cough, sputum score, Week 9-12, n=841,813 | Cough, sputum score, Week 13-16, n=831,802 | Cough, sputum score, Week 17-20, n=828,788 | Cough, sputum score, Week 21-24, n=825,783 | Chest score, Week 1-4, n=870,859 | Chest score, Week 5-8, n=851,830 | Chest score, Week 9-12, n=841,813 | Chest score, Week 13-16, n=831,802 | Chest score, Week 17-20, n=828,788 | Chest score, Week 21-24, n=825,783 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.50 | -0.77 | -1.05 | -1.09 | -1.02 | -0.96 | -0.20 | -0.26 | -0.34 | -0.36 | -0.31 | -0.30 | -0.24 | -0.39 | -0.50 | -0.53 | -0.53 | -0.50 | -0.06 | -0.12 | -0.20 | -0.20 | -0.17 | -0.17 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -1.45 | -2.00 | -2.23 | -2.42 | -2.43 | -2.31 | -0.71 | -0.95 | -1.03 | -1.11 | -1.10 | -1.07 | -0.41 | -0.59 | -0.67 | -0.74 | -0.77 | -0.72 | -0.33 | -0.46 | -0.54 | -0.58 | -0.57 | -0.53 |
The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1-4, n=205, 213 | Week 5-8, n=203, 208 | Week 9-12, n=201, 206 | Week 13-16, n=201, 204 | Week 17-20, n=201, 199 | Week 21-24, n=202, 197 | Week 25-28, n=194, 186 | Week 29-32, n=192, 181 | Week 33-36, n=187, 180 | Week 37-40, n=185, 177 | Week 41-44, n=180, 174 | Week 45-48, n=180, 173 | EXACT-RS Scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171 | Breathlessness scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213 | Breathlessness scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208 | Breathlessness scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206 | Breathlessness scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204 | Breathlessness scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199 | Breathlessness scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197 | Breathlessness scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186 | Breathlessness scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181 | Breathlessness scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180 | Breathlessness scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177 | Breathlessness scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174 | Breathlessness scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173 | Breathlessness scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173 | Cough and sputum scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171 | Chest scores, Week 1-4, n=205, 213 | Chest scores, Week 5-8, n=203, 208 | Chest scores, Week 9-12, n=201, 206 | Chest scores, Week 13-16, n=201, 204 | Chest scores, Week 17-20, n=201, 199 | Chest scores, Week 21-24, n=202, 197 | Chest scores, Week 25-28, n=194, 186 | Chest scores, Week 29-32, n=192, 181 | Chest scores, Week 33-36, n=187, 180 | Chest scores, Week 37-40, n=185, 177 | Chest scores, Week 41-44, n=180, 174 | Chest scores, Week 45-48, n=180, 173 | Chest scores, Week 49-52, n=179, 171 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.72 | -0.90 | -1.21 | -1.52 | -1.53 | -1.52 | -1.16 | -0.90 | -0.62 | -1.11 | -0.81 | -0.64 | -0.61 | -0.31 | -0.32 | -0.44 | -0.57 | -0.50 | -0.50 | -0.38 | -0.26 | -0.14 | -0.37 | -0.24 | -0.11 | -0.08 | -0.32 | -0.44 | -0.52 | -0.62 | -0.73 | -0.71 | -0.57 | -0.48 | -0.40 | -0.54 | -0.41 | -0.39 | -0.44 | -0.09 | -0.13 | -0.24 | -0.31 | -0.29 | -0.30 | -0.21 | -0.16 | -0.08 | -0.20 | -0.16 | -0.13 | -0.08 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -1.24 | -1.97 | -2.18 | -2.53 | -2.64 | -2.63 | -2.48 | -2.33 | -2.12 | -2.34 | -2.30 | -2.17 | -2.03 | -0.64 | -0.93 | -1.05 | -1.19 | -1.17 | -1.13 | -1.14 | -1.11 | -1.08 | -1.13 | -1.06 | -0.97 | -0.96 | -0.34 | -0.59 | -0.63 | -0.73 | -0.83 | -0.83 | -0.73 | -0.68 | -0.56 | -0.65 | -0.66 | -0.66 | -0.61 | -0.27 | -0.46 | -0.51 | -0.61 | -0.67 | -0.68 | -0.63 | -0.55 | -0.48 | -0.57 | -0.58 | -0.57 | -0.49 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | International units per liter (IU/L) (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, ALT, n=838,785 | Maximum post BL, ALT, n=887,864 | Week 24, AST, n=835,785 | Maximum post BL, AST, n=887,866 | Week 24, ALP, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, ALP, n=888,866 | Week 24, GGT, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, GGT, n=888,866 | Week 24, Creatine Kinase, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=888,866 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 3.8 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 5.6 | -2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 4.7 | -3.4 | 20.6 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 1.4 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 7.5 | -3.9 | 20.6 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). The maximum post BL values have been presented. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, Albumin, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Albumin, n=888,866 | Week 24, Protein, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Protein, n=888,866 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.5 | 0.2 | -1.0 | 0.1 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.7 | 0.1 | -0.6 | 0.4 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 52, Albumin, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL,Albumin, n=207,214 | Week 52, Protein, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Protein, n=207,214 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.7 | 0.2 | -1.6 | 0.0 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.8 | 0.4 | -1.1 | 0.6 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | International units per liter (IU/L) (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 52, ALT, n=181,173 | Maximum post BL, ALT, n=207,212 | Week 52, AST, n=180,174 | Maximum post BL, AST, n=207,214 | Week 52, ALP, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, ALP, n=207,214 | Week 52, GGT, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, GGT, n=207,214 | Week 52, Creatine Kinase, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Creatine Kinase, n=207,214 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 1.3 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 3.7 | -2.7 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 8.9 | 16.7 | 46.9 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 1.7 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 0.2 | 7.7 | 6.1 | 39.9 |
Hematology laboratory assessments included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a repeat test). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | 10^9 cells/Liter(L) (Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, Basophils, n=817,761 | Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=876,853 | Week 24, Eosinophils, n=817, 761 | Maxmium post BL, Eosinophils, n=876,853 | Category title 5. Week 24, Monocytes, n=817,761 | Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=876,853 | Week 24, Neutrophils, n=817,761 | Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=876,853 | Week 24, Leukocytes, n=819,761 | Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=877,853 | Week 24, Platelets, n=810,759 | Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=871,846 | Week 24, Lymphocytes, n=817,761 | Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=876,853 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.001 | 0.005 | -0.015 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.048 | 0.142 | 0.649 | 0.11 | 0.64 | -0.7 | 10.2 | -0.023 | 0.150 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.001 | 0.005 | -0.008 | 0.034 | -0.006 | 0.040 | 0.071 | 0.481 | 0.06 | 0.52 | -0.7 | 10.8 | 0.002 | 0.187 |
Hematology laboratory assessments included Basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes,neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | 10^9 cells/L (Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 52, Basophils, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Basophils, n=205,212 | Week 52, Eosinophils, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Eosinophils, n=205,212 | Week 52, Monocytes, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Monocytes, n=205,212 | Week 52, Neutrophils, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Neutrophils, n=205,212 | Week 52, Leukocytes, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Leukocytes, n=205,212 | Week 52, Platelets, n=170,166 | Maximum post BL, Platelets, n=203,210 | Week 52, Lymphocytes, n=168,166 | Maximum post BL, Lymphocytes, n=202,212 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.003 | 0.010 | -0.011 | 0.057 | 0.028 | 0.072 | -0.163 | 0.835 | -0.17 | 0.87 | -2.7 | 13.9 | -0.027 | 0.295 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.074 | 0.025 | 0.075 | 0.246 | 0.923 | 0.33 | 0.97 | -1.8 | 13.6 | 0.060 | 0.325 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Micromoles per liter (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, Bilirubin, n=839,786 | Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=888,865 | Week 24, Creatinine, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=888,866 | Week 24, Urate, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Urate, n=888,866 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.14 | 3.99 | 1.7 | 21.9 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.2 | 1.1 | 1.05 | 4.12 | 2.8 | 23.7 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 of the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Micromoles per liter (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 52, Bilirubin, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Bilirubin, n=207,214 | Week 52, Creatinine, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Creatinine, n=207,214 | Week 52, Urate, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Urate, n=207,214 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.1 | 2.3 | 1.28 | 6.00 | 3.9 | 40.0 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.3 | 2.0 | 2.95 | 6.99 | 3.6 | 42.0 |
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Milliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
QTcF, n=840,787 | PR, n=812,766 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.6 | 0.5 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 2.5 | -0.1 |
Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | 10^12 cells/L (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24, n=822,769 | Maximum post BL, n=880,857 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.04 | 0.04 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.02 | 0.06 |
Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | 10^12 cells/L (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 52, n=174,170 | Maximum post BL, n=206,212 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.00 | 0.07 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.02 | 0.11 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, Calcium, n=835,785 | Maximum post BL, Calcium, n=887,866 | Week 24, Chloride, n=838,787 | Maximum post BL, Chloride, n=888,866 | Week 24, CO2, n=835,785 | Maximum post BL, CO2, n=835,785 | Week 24, Glucose, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Glucose, n=887,866 | Week 24, Potassium, n=834,785 | Maximum post BL, Potassium, n=887,866 | Week 24, Phosphate, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Phosphate, n=888,866 | Week 24, Sodium, n=837,787 | Maximum post BL, Sodium, n=888,866 | Week 24, Urea, n=839,787 | Maximum post BL, Urea, n=888,866 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.014 | 0.012 | -0.7 | 0.6 | -0.0 | 0.5 | -0.00 | 0.37 | -0.03 | 0.13 | -0.029 | 0.043 | -0.2 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.64 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.016 | 0.013 | -0.4 | 0.9 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.028 | 0.039 | -0.3 | 0.6 | 0.08 | 0.68 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, magnesium, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Mmol/L (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 52, Calcium, n=180,174 | Maximum post BL,Calcium, n=207,214 | Week 52, Chloride, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL,Chloride, n=207,214 | Week 52, CO2, n=180,174 | Maximum post BL,CO2, n=207,214 | Week 52, Glucose, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL,Glucose, n=207,214 | Week 52, Potassium, n=180,174 | Maximum post BL,Potassium, n=207,214 | Week 52, Phosphate, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL,Phosphate, n=207,214 | Week 52, Sodium, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL,Sodium, n=207,214 | Week 52, Urea, n=181,174 | Maximum post BL, Urea, n=207,214 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.040 | 0.008 | -0.2 | 1.3 | -1.0 | 0.3 | 0.22 | 0.63 | -0.10 | 0.20 | 0.005 | 0.110 | -0.1 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 1.08 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.033 | 0.026 | -0.1 | 1.4 | -1.2 | -0.2 | 0.31 | 0.92 | -0.02 | 0.29 | -0.003 | 0.109 | -0.2 | 1.1 | 0.16 | 1.06 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Fraction of 1 (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24, n=822,769 | Maximum post BL, n=880,857 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.0024 | 0.0123 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0.0024 | 0.0115 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Fraction of 1 (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 52, n=174,170 | Maximum post BL, n=206,212 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -0.0056 | 0.0149 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.0056 | 0.0153 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Grams per liter (g/L) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24, n=822,769 | Maximum post BL, n=880,857 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.0 | 1.5 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -0.9 | 1.5 |
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 52, n=174,170 | Maximum post BL, n=206,212 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -2.5 | 1.9 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -2.5 | 2.2 |
Single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Msec (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
QTcF, n=181,169 | PR, n=174,160 | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 2.4 | 1.4 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 1.4 | 1.6 |
Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were collected taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Millimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SBP | DBP | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | -1.1 | -0.5 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -1.0 | -0.3 |
Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 52 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SBP | DBP | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 0.3 | 0.4 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | -1.3 | -0.4 |
Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, Candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral candidiasis | Candida infection | Oral fungal infection | Oropharyngeal candidiasis | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Candida infection | Oral fungal infection | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 3 | 2 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 0 | 0 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any AE | Any SAE | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 339 | 51 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 354 | 49 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any AE | Any SAE | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 122 | 28 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 100 | 21 |
Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction]. (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any MACE, Narrow definition | Any MACE, Broad definition | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 7 | 11 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 4 | 12 |
Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction] (NCT02345161)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any MACE, Narrow definition | Any MACE, Broad definition | |
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg | 2 | 5 |
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg | 5 | 7 |
The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations which occurred during treatment was assessed. Moderate exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Analysis performed using a generalized linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution. ITT population was used which comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Exacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI | 0.91 |
FF/VI | 1.07 |
UMEC/VI | 1.21 |
The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, for participants with blood eosinophil count >=150 cells per microliter , has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non-missing eosinophil, at Baseline were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Exacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI | 0.95 |
UMEC/VI | 1.39 |
The annual rate of severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, has been reported. Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (<=1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening) were used. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Exacerbations per participant per year (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI | 0.13 |
FF/VI | 0.15 |
UMEC/VI | 0.19 |
SGRQ is a disease specific-questionnaire, designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). SGRQ contains 14 questions with total of 40 items grouped into three domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts). The overall summary score along with scores for the individual domains of symptoms, activity and impacts were assessed. Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by sum of maximum weights for items in SGRQ. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. A decrease in score indicates improvement in HRQoL and higher score implies worse quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Scores on SGRQ scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI | -5.5 |
FF/VI | -3.7 |
FEV1 was defined as the amount of air a person exhales in one second. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value of FEV1 at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline for trough FEV1 was defined as Day 1 (Pre-dose). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed using a Repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (Screening), geographical region, visit, Baseline, Baseline by visit and treatment group by visit interactions. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Liter (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
FF/UMEC/VI | 0.094 |
FF/VI | -0.003 |
This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (<=1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening), have been reported. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If <25% (and <50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Days (Number) | |
---|---|---|
First quartile time to onset | Median time to onset | |
FF/UMEC/VI | 112 | NA |
FF/VI | 81 | NA |
UMEC/VI | 73 | 306 |
This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations for participants with blood eosinophil count >=150 cells per microliter, at Baseline has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non missing eosinophils at Baseline were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If <25% (and <50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment. (NCT02164513)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Days (Number) | |
---|---|---|
First quartile time to onset | Median time to onset | |
FF/UMEC/VI | 107 | NA |
UMEC/VI | 55 | 253 |
2 reviews available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic
Article | Year |
---|---|
Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bromides; Disease Progression; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Hospitalizat | 2017 |
Umeclidinium bromide + vilanterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Topics: Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-B | 2015 |
4 trials available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic
Article | Year |
---|---|
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium Bromide, and Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma, Using Data from a Phase IIIA Study (CAPTAIN).
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chlorobenzenes; Doubl | 2021 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Anticonvulsants; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Chloro | 2020 |
Effects of inhalation of thermal water on exhaled breath condensate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Fluids; Breath Tests; Bromides; Cross-Over | 2010 |
Effect of inhalation of thermal water on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Bromides; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Exercise Test; Female; | 2005 |
2 other studies available for bromide and Airflow Obstruction, Chronic
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Experience of using a triple fixed combination in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Benzyl Alcohols; Bromides; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug C | 2022 |
[The clinical efficiency and safety of iodide-bromine balneotherapy in patients with coronary heart disease concurrent with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
Topics: Baths; Bromides; Coronary Disease; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human | 2010 |