bq-123 and Pain

Oral ulcer is the most common oral disease and leads to pain during meals and speaking, reducing the quality of life of patients. Recent evidence using animal models suggests that oral ulcers induce cyclooxygenase-dependent spontaneous pain and cyclooxygenase-independent mechanical allodynia. Endothelin-1 is upregulated in oral mucosal inflammation, although it has not been shown to induce pain in oral ulcers. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of endothelin-1 signaling with oral ulcer-induced pain using our proprietary assay system in conscious rats. Endothelin-1 was significantly upregulated in oral ulcers experimentally induced by topical acetic acid treatment, while endothelin-1 production was suppressed by antibacterial pretreatment. Spontaneous nociceptive behavior in oral ulcer model rats was inhibited by swab applications of BQ-788 (ET

Topics: Acetanilides; Anilides; Animals; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds; Caproates; Cinnamates; Disease Models, Animal; Endothelin-1; Male; Oligopeptides; Oral Ulcer; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Purines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; TRPV Cation Channels

The peptide endothelin-1 (ET1), which was originally identified as a vasoconstrictor, has emerged as a critical regulator of a number of painful conditions, including inflammatory pain and tumor-associated pain. There is considerable pharmacological evidence supporting a role for endothelin A receptors (ET(A)) in mediating ET1-induced pro-algesic functions. ET(A) receptors are expressed in small-diameter nociceptive neurons, but also found in a variety of other cell types in peripheral tissues, including immune cells, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, which have the potential to modulate nociception. To elucidate the functional contribution of ET(A) receptors expressed in sensory neurons towards the functions of the ET1 axis in pathological pain states, we undertook a conditional gene deletion approach to selectively deplete expression of ET(A) in sensory nerves, preserving expression in non-neural peripheral tissues; the expression of ET(B) remained unchanged. Behavioural and pharmacological experiments showed that only late nociceptive hypersensitivity caused by ET1 is abrogated upon a loss of ET(A) receptors on nociceptors and further suggest that ET1-induced early nociceptive hypersensitivity involves activation of ET(A) as well as ET(B) receptors in non-neural peripheral cells. Furthermore, in the context of alleviation of cancer pain and chronic inflammatory pain by ET(A) receptor antagonists, we observed in corresponding mouse models that the contribution of ET(A) receptors expressed in nociceptors is most significant. These results help understand the role of ET(A) receptors in complex biological processes and peripheral cell-cell interactions involved in inflammatory and tumor-associated pain.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Carcinoma; Disease Models, Animal; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Ganglia, Spinal; Hyperalgesia; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; NAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Nociceptors; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptor, Endothelin A; RNA, Messenger; Sensory Receptor Cells; Sodium Channels; Time Factors; Tubulin

A profound tachyphylaxis of the acute nocifensive flinching (pain) response to subcutaneous injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1) into the hind paw footpad is shown by the reduced response to a second injection. Flinching from the second injection was 20% +/- 5%, 57% +/- 18%, 79% +/- 35%, and 100% +/- 17% of that from the first injection (both 200 micromol/L, 2 nmol) at respective intervals of 24, 30, 48, and 72 h. Inhibition of afferent impulses by local anesthesia of the sciatic nerve, reducing initial flinching to 6%-13% of control, did not affect the tachyphylaxis for the second injection at 24 h. There was no cross-desensitization between formalin and ET-1 injected sequentially into the same paw. Suppression of descending inhibitory effects from endogenous opiates by naloxone (5-8 mg/kg, i.p.), given 30 min before the second ET-1 injection, did not prevent tachyphylaxis. Diffuse effects caused by an initial subcutaneous ET-1 injection into the tail or forepaw resulted in sensitization of the response to ET-1 in the hind paw, rather than tachyphylaxis. In contrast, selective inhibition of local ETA receptors during the initial administration of ET-1, by the antagonist BQ-123 (3.2 mmol/L), reduced tachyphylaxis of nocifensive flinching. Therefore, prolonged pain tachyphylaxis is not due to reduced responsiveness of the CNS, but rather depends on the functional sensitivity or availability of peripheral ET(A) receptors.

Topics: Anesthetics; Animals; Central Nervous System; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Foot; Formaldehyde; Hindlimb; Hyperalgesia; Male; Naloxone; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptides, Cyclic; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sciatic Nerve; Tachyphylaxis; Time Factors; Touch

In this study, we investigated the role of the peripheral endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentration in a cancer pain model. To test the hypothesis that the concentration of ET-1 in the tumor microenvironment is important in determining the level of cancer pain we used two cancer pain mouse models that differed significantly in production of ET-1. The two mouse cancer models were produced by injection of cells derived from a human oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma into the hind paw of female mice. Pain, as indicated by reduction in withdrawal thresholds in response to mechanical stimulation, was significantly greater in the SCC group than the melanoma group. The peripheral concentration of ET-1 within the cancer microenvironment was significantly greater in the SCC group. Intra-tumor expression of both ET-1 mRNA and ET-1 protein were significantly higher in the SCC model compared to the melanoma model. ET receptor antagonism was effective as an analgesic for cancer pain in the SCC model only. To address the potential confounding factor of tumor volume we evaluated the contribution of tumor volume to cancer pain in the two models. The mean volumes of the tumors in the melanoma group were significantly greater than the tumors in the SCC group. In both groups, the pain level correlated with tumor volume, but the correlation was stronger in the melanoma group. We conclude that ET-1 concentration is a determinant of the level of pain in a cancer pain mouse model and it is a more important factor than tumor volume in producing cancer pain. These results suggest that future treatment regimens for cancer pain directed at ET-1 receptor antagonism show promise and may be tumor type specific.

Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Female; Hyperalgesia; Melanoma, Experimental; Mice; Mice, Nude; Mouth Neoplasms; Neoplasm Proteins; Organ Specificity; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptor, Endothelin A; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Neoplasm; Transplantation, Heterologous; Tumor Burden

We investigated whether endothelin (ET) would be involved in skin cancer pain in mice. Orthotopic inoculation of B16-BL6 melanoma cells into the plantar region of the hind paw produced marked mechanical allodynia in C57BL/6 mice. Intraplantar injections of the ET(A)-receptor antagonist BQ-123 (0.3 - 3 nmol/site), but not the ET(B)-receptor antagonist BQ-788 (1 and 3 nmol/site), inhibited mechanical allodynia in mice with grown melanoma. In naive mice, an intraplantar injection of tumor extract (1 and 3 mg/site), which was prepared from the grown melanoma in the paw, produced mechanical allodynia, which was inhibited by BQ-123 and BQ-788 at doses of 3 and 10 nmol/site. An intraplantar injection of ET-1 (1 and 10 pmol/site) elicited licking behavior, which was increased in the melanoma-bearing hind paw. BQ-123 (3 and 10 nmol/site) inhibited licking induced by ET-1 (10 pmol/site). The level of mRNA of ET(A), but not ET(B), receptor, was significantly increased in the dorsal root ganglia on the inoculated side. Cultured B16-BL6 cells contained ET, and the melanoma mass increased the concentration of ET as it grew bigger. These results suggest that ET-1 and ET(A) receptor are at least partly involved in the induction of pain induced by melanoma cell inoculation.

Topics: Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cell Line, Tumor; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin B Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Ganglia, Spinal; Male; Melanoma, Experimental; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasm Transplantation; Oligopeptides; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; RNA, Messenger

In this study we investigated the role of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its peripheral receptor (ET-A) in carcinoma-induced pain in a mouse cancer pain model. Tumors were induced in the hind paw of female mice by local injection of cells derived from a human oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Significant pain, as indicated by reduction in withdrawal thresholds in response to mechanical stimulation, began at four days after SCC inoculation and lasted to 28 days, the last day of measurement. Intra-tumor expression of both ET-1 mRNA and ET-1 protein were significantly upregulated compared to normal tissue, and local administration of the ET-A receptor selective antagonist, BQ-123 (100 microM) significantly elevated withdrawal thresholds, indicating the induction of an antinociceptive effect. These findings support the suggestion that ET-1 and ET-A receptors contribute to the severity of carcinoma-induced soft tissue cancer pain.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Cell Line, Tumor; Culture Media; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Mice; Mice, Nude; Morphine; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Peptides, Cyclic; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Topics: Animals; Antigens; Bosentan; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelins; Hyperalgesia; Hypersensitivity; Indicators and Reagents; Male; Mice; Oligopeptides; Ovalbumin; p-Methoxy-N-methylphenethylamine; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Sulfonamides; Viper Venoms

The participation of the endothelin system on nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the knee-joint was investigated. Intra-articular (i.a.) carrageenan (300 microg) caused long-lasting nociceptive effects (i.e., increases in paw elevation time [PET]), which were potentiated by endothelin-1 (dual endothelin ETA/ETB receptor agonist) and inhibited by sarafotoxin S6c (endothelin ETB receptor agonist; both at 30 pmol, i.a., 24 h beforehand). Priming the naive joint with carrageenan augmented nociceptive responses to a second carrageenan challenge, 72 h later. Carrageenan-induced priming, but not nociception, was potentiated by local BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a., 15 min before priming; endothelin ETB receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyl-tryptophanil-D-norleucine), but BQ-123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist; cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) was ineffective. Sarafotoxin S6c markedly suppressed carrageenan-induced priming to nociception triggered by carrageenan, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, and BQ-788 prevented this action. Thus, selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists inhibit carrageenan-induced nociception and priming in the naive joint. This priming effect of carrageenan to nociception evoked by subsequent inflammatory insults is limited by an endothelin ETB receptor-operated mechanism.

Topics: Animals; Carrageenan; Endothelin B Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Joint Capsule; Knee Joint; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptides, Cyclic; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Endothelin B

Several neurotransmitter mechanisms have been proposed as playing a role in the development of morphine tolerance. We provide evidence for the first time that endothelin antagonists can restore morphine analgesia in morphine-tolerant rats and prevent the development of tolerance to morphine. Studies were carried out in rats and mice treated with implanted placebo or implanted morphine pellet. The maximal tail-flick latency in morphine pellet + vehicle-treated rats (7.54 seconds) was significantly lower when compared with placebo pellet + vehicle-treated rats (10 seconds), indicating that tolerance developed to the analgesic effect of morphine. BQ123 potentiated tail-flick latency by 30.0% in placebo-tolerant rats and 94.5% in morphine-tolerant rats compared with respective controls. BMS182874 potentiated tail-flick latency by 30.2% in placebo-tolerant rats and 66.7% in morphine-tolerant rats. The enhanced analgesic effect of morphine after treatment with endothelin antagonists could be blocked by naloxone, indicating an opiate-mediated effect; but naloxone binding to brain membranes was not affected by BQ123. Guanosine triphosphate binding was stimulated by morphine and endothelin-1 in non-tolerant mice and not in morphine-tolerant mice; however, guanosine triphosphate binding was stimulated by BQ123 in morphine-tolerant mice and was unaffected in non-tolerant mice. These results suggest that uncoupling of G-protein occurs in morphine tolerance and endothelin antagonist restores the coupling of G-protein to its receptors. A combination use of endothelin antagonist and opiates could provide a novel approach in improving analgesia and eliminating tolerance.

Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Dansyl Compounds; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Injections, Intraventricular; Male; Mice; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Peptides, Cyclic; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Sulfur Radioisotopes; Time Factors

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) in the central nervous system has been suggested to produce suppressive effects on pain transmission. We investigated the manner by which ET-1 exerts this action. ET-1 administered intracerebroventricularly produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in a thermal pain test that utilized a spinal reflex to determine nociceptive thresholds. This suggested that the antinociceptive effect of ET-1 involved a descending pain inhibitory system. The antinociceptive effect was blocked by an ETA receptor antagonist but not by an ETB receptor antagonist, indicating that the action was mediated through the ETA receptor. Antagonists of opioid receptors, serotonin receptors, alpha-2 adrenergic receptors, oxytocin receptors, and dopamine receptors did not block the antinociceptive effect of ET-1. Thus, major descending inhibitory systems were probably not involved. The antinociceptive effect was blocked by intracerebroventricular administration of an alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist. This indicated that the antinociceptive effect involved the activation of a supraspinal noradrenergic pathway, which in turn may activate a still unknown descending pain inhibitory system.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Brain; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin B Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Injections, Intraventricular; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neural Inhibition; Neural Pathways; Oligopeptides; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Prazosin; Reaction Time; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1; Yohimbine

Neurobehavioral and neurophysiological actions of the peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) were investigated after subcutaneous plantar hindpaw injections in adult male Sprague Dawley rats. Hindpaw flinching developed within minutes after ET-1 (8-16 nmol) injection, peaked at 30 min, lasted for 60 min, and was strongly inhibited by the endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (3.2 m). In separate experiments, impulse activity of single, physiologically characterized sensory C-, Adelta-, and Abeta-fibers was recorded from the sciatic nerve in anesthetized rats after subcutaneous injections of endothelin-1 (1-20 nmol), alone or together with BQ-123 (3.2 m), into the plantar hindpaw receptive fields of these units. All nociceptive C-fibers (31 of 33 C-fibers studied) were excited by ET-1 (1-20 nmol) in a dose-dependent manner. For doses of 16-20 nmol, the mean latency for afferent activation after injection of ET-1 was 3.16 +/- 0.31 min, and the mean and maximum response frequency were 2.02 +/- 0.48 impulses (imp)/sec and 14.0 +/- 3.2 imp/sec, respectively. All 10 nociceptive Adelta-fibers (of 12 Adelta-fibers studied) also responded to 1-20 nmol of ET-1 in a dose-dependent manner with a mean latency of 3.5 +/- 0.12 min and mean response frequency of 3.3 +/- 2.3 imp/sec. In contrast, most Abeta-fibers (9 of 12) did not respond to ET-1. BQ-123, when coinjected with ET-1, blocked ET-1-induced activation in all C- and Adelta-fibers tested. These data demonstrate that subcutaneous administration of ET-1 to the rat plantar hindpaw produces pain-like behavior and selective excitation of nociceptive fibers through activation of ET(A) receptors.

Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Hindlimb; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Nerve Fibers; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated; Neurons, Afferent; Nociceptors; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptides, Cyclic; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reaction Time; Receptor, Endothelin A; Sciatic Nerve

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) induces endothelin-A (ETA) receptor-mediated pain and selective excitation of nociceptors. Here we studied ET-1-induced changes in intracellular calcium (Ca2+in) in Fura-2 loaded mouse neuroblastoma-rat dorsal root ganglion hybrid cells (ND7/104). ET-1 (1-400 nM) induced concentration-dependent, transient increases in Ca2+in, probably of intracellular source. Responses to repeated application declined with increasing ET-1 concentration, implying receptor desensitization. Treatment of cells with the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the response that was 20% of ET-1 alone (IC50 = 20 nM, KI = 7 nM). No inhibition of the calcium response was observed with the selective ETB antagonist, BQ-788 (10-1000 nM). These results demonstrate that ET-1 induces dose- and ETA receptor-dependent release of Ca2+in in nociceptor-like neurons, and permit further examination of the pathways that underlie ET-1-induced pain signaling.

Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium; Calcium Channels; Calcium Signaling; Cell Line, Transformed; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Fluorescent Dyes; Fluorometry; Fura-2; Ganglia, Spinal; Intracellular Fluid; Mice; Models, Biological; Neuroblastoma; Neurons, Afferent; Nociceptors; Oligopeptides; Pain; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Rats; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptors, Endothelin

Endothelins (ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3) or endothelin precursors (big-ET-1[1-38], big-ET-2[1-37] or big-ET-3[1-41]) injected i.p. in mice have previously been shown to elicit a characteristic nociceptive behavioral response. In this study, we investigated the endothelin receptor type (ETA or ETB) that mediates this behavioral response. Mice were injected i.p. with ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, big-ET-1[1-38], big-ET-2[1-37], big-ET-3[1-41], sarafotoxin S6a, sarafotoxin S6b, sarafotoxin S6c, ET-1 with Ala substitutions for Cys3 and Cys11 or His-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp, and quantal dose-response curves were obtained for each of the compounds (except the latter). Co-administration of enzyme inhibitors with the big-endothelins was used to establish the requisite conversion to endothelins and big-ET-1[22-38], big-ET-2[22-37] and ET-3[22-41] amide, and the ETA-selective antagonist cyclo[-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp-] was used to determine receptor specificity. The ED50 values were 2.9, 3.3 and 23.9 micrograms/kg i.p. for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3, respectively, 0.6, 0.6 and 13.1 micrograms/kg i.p. for sarafotoxin S6a, sarafotoxin S6b and sarafotoxin S6c, respectively, and 5.3 micrograms/kg i.p. for ET-1 with Ala substitutions for Cys3 and Cys11. Big-ET-1[22-38], big-ET-2[22-37], big-ET-3[22-41] amide and ET-C produced less than 25% effect up to 2000 micrograms/kg. The big-ET-1-induced effects were blocked by the enzyme inhibitors phosphoramidon and thiorphan (ID50 = 0.9 mg/kg) but not by ubenimex (bestatin), captopril or perindopril. Cyclo[-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp-] blocked ET-1- and ET-2-induced effects but not ET-3-, ACh- or phenyl-p-quinone-induced effects. These results suggest that endothelin-induced nociceptive behavioral response in mice can be mediated via both ET receptor types, ETA and ETB. Further, the ET-1 carboxy-terminal hexapeptide is insufficient to produce the effect, and the Cys3-Cys11 disulfide bridge of ET-1 is not required.

Topics: Animals; Endothelins; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Pain; Peptide Fragments; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; Receptors, Endothelin; Viper Venoms