bq-123 and Hyperinsulinism

Endogenous endothelin action is augmented in human obesity and type 2 diabetes and contributes to endothelial dysfunction and impairs insulin-mediated vasodilation in humans. We hypothesized that insulin resistance-associated hyperinsulinemia could preferentially drive endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction. We applied hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with higher insulin dosing in obese subjects than lean subjects (30 vs. 10 mU.m(-2).min(-1), respectively), with the goal of matching insulin's nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vascular effects. We predicted that, under these circumstances, insulin-stimulated endothelin-1 (ET-1) action (assessed with the type A endothelin receptor antagonist BQ-123) would be augmented in proportion to hyperinsulinemia. NO bioactivity was assessed using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine. Insulin-mediated vasodilation and insulin-stimulated NO bioavailability were well matched across groups by this approach. As expected, steady-state insulin levels were approximately threefold higher in obese than lean subjects (109.2 +/- 10.2 pmol/l vs. 518.4 +/- 84.0, P = 0.03). Despite this, the augmentation of insulin-mediated vasodilation by BQ-123 was not different between groups. ET-1 flux across the leg was not augmented by insulin alone but was increased with the addition of BQ-123 to insulin (P = 0.01 BQ-123 effect, P = not significant comparing groups). Endothelin antagonism augmented insulin-stimulated NO bioavailability and NOx flux, but not differently between groups and not proportional to hyperinsulinemia. These findings do not support the hypothesis that insulin resistance-associated hyperinsulinemia preferentially drives endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Female; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Insulin; Male; Muscle, Skeletal; Nitric Oxide; Obesity; omega-N-Methylarginine; Peptides, Cyclic; Vasoconstriction

Cardiovascular diseases are characterized by insulin resistance and elevated endothelin (ET)-1 levels. Furthermore, ET-1 induces insulin resistance. To elucidate this mechanism, six healthy subjects were studied during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp during infusion of (the ET-1 precursor) big ET-1 alone or after ET(A)- or ET(B)-receptor blockade. Insulin levels rose after big ET-1 with or without the ET(B) antagonist BQ-788 (P < 0.05) but were unchanged after the ET(A) antagonist BQ-123 + big ET-1. Infused glucose divided by insulin fell after big ET-1 with or without BQ-788 (P < 0.05). Insulin and infused glucose divided by insulin values were normalized by ET(A) blockade. Mean arterial blood pressure rose during big ET-1 with or without BQ-788 (P < 0.001) but was unchanged after BQ-123. Skeletal muscle, splanchnic, and renal blood flow responses to big ET-1 were abolished by BQ-123. ET-1 levels rose after big ET-1 (P < 0.01) in a similar way after BQ-123 or BQ-788, despite higher elimination capacity after ET(A) blockade. In conclusion, ET-1-induced reduction in insulin sensitivity and clearance as well as splanchnic and renal vasoconstriction are ET(A) mediated. ET(A)-receptor stimulation seems to inhibit the conversion of big ET-1 to ET-1.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Arteries; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Endothelins; Heart Rate; Hepatic Veins; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Insulin Resistance; Male; Muscle, Skeletal; Oxygen; Peptides, Cyclic; Protein Precursors; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; Receptors, Endothelin; Renal Circulation; Splanchnic Circulation

Plasma levels of circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (cICAM-1), a potential cardiovascular risk factor, are increased in diabetics. Among other factors, hyperinsulinemia has been proposed to enhance its release into the circulation. Thus, we directly examined the effects of insulin infusion on plasma levels of circulating adhesion molecules, and two other endothelial markers, i.e. von Willebrand factor (vWF) and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The study design was balanced, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, and cross-over. Twelve healthy male subjects received, on separate study days, a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (3 mU/kg x min) or placebo over 6 h. Plasma levels of cICAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, circulating E-selectin, and sTM were measured by enzyme immunoassay; vWF-Ag was measured using a STA clot analyzer. Plasma levels of these adhesion molecules and endothelial cell activation markers were not affected despite a 30-fold increase in insulin levels. Hyperinsulinemia has no adverse effect on circulating ICAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin, vWF, or sTM and therefore does not directly induce endothelial activation.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; Male; Peptides, Cyclic; Thrombomodulin; Time Factors; Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1; von Willebrand Factor

Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is a hallmark of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). In healthy individuals insulin stimulates vasodilation, which is markedly blunted in T2D; however, the mechanism(s) remain incompletely understood. Investigations in rodents indicate augmented endothelin-1 (ET-1) action as a major contributor. Human studies have been limited to young obese participants and focused exclusively on the ET-1 A (ETA) receptor. Herein, we have hypothesized that ETA receptor antagonism would improve insulin-stimulated vasodilation and glucose uptake in T2D, with further improvements observed during concurrent ETA + ET-1 B (ETB) antagonism. Arterial pressure (arterial line), leg blood flow (LBF; Doppler), and leg glucose uptake (LGU) were measured at rest, during hyperinsulinemia alone, and hyperinsulinemia with (1) femoral artery infusion of BQ-123, the selective ETA receptor antagonist (n = 10 control, n = 9 T2D) and then (2) addition of BQ-788 (selective ETB antagonist) for blockade of ETA and ETB receptors (n = 7 each). The LBF responses to hyperinsulinemia alone tended to be lower in T2D (controls: ∆161 ± 160 mL/minute; T2D: ∆58 ± 43 mL/minute, P = .08). BQ-123 during hyperinsulinemia augmented LBF to a greater extent in T2D (% change: controls: 14 ± 23%; T2D: 38 ± 21%, P = .029). LGU following BQ-123 increased similarly between groups (P = .85). Concurrent ETA + ETB antagonism did not further increase LBF or LGU in either group. Collectively, these findings suggest that during hyperinsulinemia ETA receptor activation restrains vasodilation more in T2D than controls while limiting glucose uptake similarly in both groups, with no further effect of ETB receptors (NCT04907838).

Topics: Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelin B Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Leg; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Peptides, Cyclic; Piperidines; Receptor, Endothelin A; Regional Blood Flow; Vasodilation