bivalirudin and Peripheral-Arterial-Disease

Bivalirudin may be an effective alternative anticoagulant to heparin for use in percutaneous peripheral interventions. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin as the procedural anticoagulant agent in patients undergoing percutaneous peripheral intervention.. For this meta-analysis and systematic review, we conducted a search in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane for all the clinical studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the procedural anticoagulant in percutaneous peripheral interventions. Outcomes studied included all-cause mortality, all-bleeding, major and minor bleeding, and access site complications.. Eleven studies were included in the analysis, totaling 20,137 patients. There was a significant difference favoring bivalirudin over heparin for all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87), all-bleeding (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.78), major bleeding (risk ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96), minor bleeding (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92), and access site complications (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84). There was no significant difference in peri-procedural need for blood transfusions (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.08), myocardial infarction (risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.59-1.28), stroke (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.01), intracranial bleeding (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.29-2.02), or amputations (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.05).. Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin use for percutaneous peripheral interventions is associated with lower all-cause mortality, bleeding, and access site complications as compared to heparin. Further large randomized trials are needed to confirm the current results.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Catheterization, Peripheral; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the BRAVO-3 trial with respect to the effect of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH).. PAD is found frequently in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is reported to confer an increased risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether patients with and without PAD may demonstrate a differential response to bivalirudin versus UFH.. BRAVO-3 was a randomized multicenter trial comparing transfemoral TAVR with bivalirudin versus UFH (31 centers, n = 802). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) were a composite of major bleeding or MACE.. The total cohort included 119 patients with PAD. Vascular complications occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PAD both in-hospital (25.2 vs. 16.7%; OR 1.68) and at 30 days (29.4 vs. 17.3%; OR 1.99). No significant differences were observed regarding mortality, NACE, MACE, major bleeding or CVA with bivalirudin versus UFH among patients with or without PAD. In patients with PAD, bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of minor vascular complications at 30 days.. Patients with PAD undergoing transfemoral TAVR did not exhibit an increased risk of any major adverse events, according to the procedural anticoagulant randomization. However, patients treated with Bivalirudin had significantly higher rates of minor vascular complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Catheterization, Peripheral; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Europe; Female; Femoral Artery; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; North America; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Punctures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

Revascularization of lower extremity chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is technically challenging. The Crosser® recanalization catheter was designed to facilitate distal vessel intraluminal entry that is both rapid and safe. We present our experience with the Crosser device as primary therapy for peripheral CTOs.. Subjects undergoing evaluation for arterial insufficiency at our institution between 2008-2010 who were noted to have a CTO in the lower extremity by duplex ultrasonography and who subsequently underwent Crosser recanalization were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, ankle-brachial indices, Rutherford-Becker symptom category, and angiographic CTO parameters were collected. Primary technical success was intraluminal delivery of the guidewire into the distal vessel solely by the Crosser device. Secondary technical success was assisted delivery using the Outback LTD® re-entry device. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of dissections, thromboembolism, and perforations related to the Crosser device. Statistical analysis was performed to find independent predictors for failure to achieve Crosser recanalization.. Fifty-six subjects with 73 CTOs were enrolled. The mean Crosser use time was 17.6 ± 12.7 minutes. The overall primary and secondary technical success rates for Crosser recanalization were 76.7% and 87.7%, respectively. Technical success was highest for CTOs located in the aorto-iliac (90.0%) and tibial (95.2%) arterial segments. There were no perforations related to the Crosser device. For successful cases, the mean ABI improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (0.57 ± 0.13 to 0.89 ± 0.15, p < 0.001). The only predictors for failure were lesion length longer than 100 mm (p = 0.04) and calcification within 10 mm of the exit cap (p = 0.02).. The Crosser device is safe and shows excellent efficacy in facilitating guidewire distal lumen entry, especially for aorto-iliac and tibial occlusions. The technical success rate for the femoral and popliteal occlusions is comparable to those reported with other recanalization techniques.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon; Ankle Brachial Index; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Feasibility Studies; Female; Femoral Artery; Health Status Indicators; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Recombinant Proteins

Percutaneous peripheral interventions (PPI) are often complex procedures performed on high-risk patients with a significant thrombus burden. Although there is no approved anticoagulant for use in PPI, heparin is commonly used but is associated with several limitations. The APPROVE data provide a foundation for further study of bivalirudin in the setting of PPI.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Constriction, Pathologic; Endovascular Procedures; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Iliac Artery; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Artery Obstruction