binimetinib and Neoplasm-Metastasis

BRAF V600E mutations are associated with 8-10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) and carry a poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options. In contrast to metastatic melanoma, BRAF inhibition alone or in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors has shown little utility in the treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. This is secondary to upstream activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway and other escape mechanisms. Combining RAF and MEK inhibitors with inhibition of the EGFR pathway through an anti-EGFR receptor antibody (cetuximab) led to the BEACON clinical trial (binimetinib, encorafenib and cetuximab). Trial patients had undergone at least one prior line of chemotherapy. The trial met all its endpoints and is now included in NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines. Herein we provide updates in treatment options for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, focusing on the practice-changing BEACON-triplet regimen, the first chemotherapy-free combination regimen for mCRC. This combination is being explored frontline in the ANCHOR clinical trial.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cetuximab; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Sulfonamides

Encorafenib (Braftovi™), a BRAF inhibitor, and binimetinib (Mektovi

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Approval; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Molecular Structure; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; United States

Although combination BRAF and MEK inhibitors are highly effective for the 40-50% of cutaneous metastatic melanomas harboring BRAFV600 mutations, targeted agents have been ineffective for BRAFV600wild-type (wt) metastatic melanomas. The SU2C Genomics-Enabled Medicine for Melanoma Trial utilized a Simon two-stage optimal design to assess whether comprehensive genomic profiling improves selection of molecular-based therapies for BRAFV600wt metastatic melanoma patients who had progressed on standard-of-care therapy, which may include immunotherapy. Of the response-evaluable patients, binimetinib was selected for 20 patients randomized to the genomics-enabled arm, and nine were treated on the alternate treatment arm. Response rates for 27 patients treated with targeted recommendations included one (4%) partial response, 18 (67%) with stable disease, and eight (30%) with progressive disease. Post-trial genomic and protein pathway activation mapping identified additional drug classes that may be considered for future studies. Our results highlight the complexity and heterogeneity of metastatic melanomas, as well as how the lack of response in this trial may be associated with limitations including monotherapy drug selection and the dearth of available single and combination molecularly-driven therapies to treat BRAFV600wt metastatic melanomas.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzimidazoles; Female; Genomics; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms

Background The MAPK pathway plays a central role in regulation of several cellular processes, and its dysregulation is a hallmark of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Binimetinib (MEK162), a potent, selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with advanced BTC. Patients and Methods An expansion cohort study in patients who received ≤1 line of therapy for advanced BTC was conducted after determination of the maximum tolerated dose in this Phase 1 trial. Patients received binimetinib 60 mg twice daily. The primary objectives were to characterize the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of binimetinib in advanced BTC. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical efficacy, changes in weight and lean body mass, and pharmacodynamic effects. Tumor samples were assessed for mutations in relevant genes. Results Twenty-eight patients received binimetinib. Common adverse events (AEs) were mild, with rash (82%) and nausea (54%) being most common. Two patients experienced grade 4 AEs, one generalized edema and the other pulmonary embolism. The pharmacokinetics in this patient population were consistent with those previously reported (Bendell JC et al., Br J Cancer 2017;116:575-583). Twelve patients (43%) experienced stable disease and two had objective responses (1 complete response, 1 partial response) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and stable metabolic disease by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Most patients (18/25; 72%) did not have KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3KCA, or PTEN mutations, nor was there correlation between mutation status and response. The average non-fluid weight gain was 1.3% for lean muscle and 4.7% for adipose tissue. Conclusion Binimetinib was well tolerated and showed promising evidence of activity in patients with BTC. Correlative studies suggested the potential for binimetinib to promote muscle gain in patients with BTC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; DNA Mutational Analysis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscles; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Organ Size; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Subcutaneous Fat; Treatment Outcome

Sixty percent of patients with stage IV melanoma may develop brain metastases, which result in significantly increased morbidity and a poor overall prognosis. Phase 3 studies of melanoma usually exclude patients with untreated brain metastases; therefore, clinical data for intracranial responses to treatments are limited.. A multicenter, retrospective case series investigation of consecutive BRAF-mutant patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) treated with a combination of BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and MEK inhibitor binimetinib was conducted to evaluate the antitumor response. Assessments included the intracranial, extracranial, and global objective response rates (according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1); the clinical benefit rate; the time to response; the duration of response; and safety.. A total of 24 patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant MBMs treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib in 3 centers in the United States were included. Patients had received a median of 2.5 prior lines of treatment, and 88% had prior treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The intracranial objective response rate was 33%, and the clinical benefit rate was 63%. The median time to a response was 6 weeks, and the median duration of response was 22 weeks. Among the 21 patients with MBMs and prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, the intracranial objective response rate was 24%, and the clinical benefit rate was 57%. Similar outcomes were observed for extracranial and global responses. The safety profile for encorafenib plus binimetinib was similar to that observed in patients with melanoma without brain metastases.. Combination therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib elicited intracranial activity in patients with BRAF-mutant MBMs, including patients previously treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted and ongoing.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Brain Neoplasms; Carbamates; Female; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Sulfonamides

More effective treatments are needed for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). Our patient, who suffers from metastatic LGSOC, had received all established treatments. Sequencing analysis revealed an activating BRAF mutation. Therefore, combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which is the gold standard in malignant melanoma, was initiated. After eight months of therapy, the response was assessed as complete and the treatment is still, 3.5 years after initiation, of benefit. To our knowledge, no complete response on combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment of low-grade serous ovarian cancer has previously been reported.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Bevacizumab; CA-125 Antigen; Carbamates; Carboplatin; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Disease Progression; Everolimus; Female; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Imidazoles; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Medroxyprogesterone; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Oximes; Paclitaxel; Progression-Free Survival; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Recurrence; Sulfonamides; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

B7-H3 (CD276) belongs to the B7 family of immunoregulatory proteins and has been implicated in cancer progression and metastasis. In this study, we found that metastatic melanoma cells with knockdown expression of B7-H3 showed modest decrease in proliferation and glycolytic capacity and were more sensitive to dacarbazine (DTIC) chemotherapy and small-molecule inhibitors targeting MAP kinase (MAPK) and AKT/mTOR pathways: vemurafenib (PLX4032; BRAF inhibitor), binimetinib (MEK-162; MEK inhibitor), everolimus (RAD001; mTOR inhibitor), and triciribidine (API-2; AKT inhibitor). Similar effects were observed in melanoma cells in the presence of an inhibitory B7-H3 monoclonal antibody, while the opposite was seen in B7-H3-overexpressing cells. Further, combining B7-H3 inhibition with small-molecule inhibitors resulted in significantly increased antiproliferative effect in melanoma cells, as well as in BRAF

Topics: B7 Antigens; Benzimidazoles; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dacarbazine; Everolimus; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Glycolysis; Humans; Indoles; Melanoma; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Recently, treatment with MEK inhibitors has been shown to be an effective treatment option for metastatic melanoma. Treatment efficacy is dependent on inhibition of MAPK-related melanoma proliferation. However, targeting of MEK can be accompanied by a time-dependent and reversible serous retinopathy of unknown origin.We analyzed the molecular mechanism by which the MEK inhibitor binimetinib may lead to retinopathy, using neuroretina and cell models of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).Binimetinib inhibited the MAPK pathway while discontinuation of treatment resulted in reactivation. However, cell proliferation was not inhibited correspondingly during binimetinib treatment of ARPE19 cells. Remarkably, post-mitotic neuroretinal tissue displayed a strong MAPK activation that was lost after binimetinib treatment.We propose that binimetinib-associated retinopathy is correlated with inhibition of the MAPK pathway in multiple retinal components. Retinal cells are able to regain the activation after binimetinib treatment, mimicking the reversibility of the retinopathy. As most retinal cells are nonregenerating, other mechanisms than stimulation of proliferation must be involved.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Neoplasm Metastasis; Retinal Diseases; Retinal Pigment Epithelium

Gain of function mutations in B-RAF and N-RAS occur frequently in melanoma, leading to mitogen activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation, and this pathway is the target of drugs in development. Our purpose was to study clinical characteristics of patients with mutations in this pathway and to determine activity of inhibitors of B-RAF and MEK in short term cultures grown from tumors of some of these patients.. Clinical and pathologic data were collected retrospectively on melanoma patients tested for B-RAF and N-RAS mutations at the Yale Cancer Center and associations with survival were determined. We studied in vitro activity of the pan-RAF inhibitor, RAF265, and the MEK inhibitor, MEK162, in 22 melanoma short term cultures. We further characterized the effect of MEK inhibition on apoptosis and growth of melanoma cultures.. In a cohort of 144 metastatic melanoma patients we found that patients with N-RAS mutant melanoma had a worse prognosis. These patients were more likely to have brain metastases at the time of presentation with metastatic disease than their N-RAS-wild-type counterparts. All N-RAS mutant melanoma cultures tested in our study (n = 7) were sensitive to MEK inhibition 162. Exposure to MEK162 reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and induced apoptosis. Clonogenic survival was significantly reduced in sensitive melanoma cell cultures.. The prognosis of patients with melanoma expressing constitutively active N-RAS is poor, consistent with studies performed at other institutions. N-RAS mutant melanoma cultures appear to be particularly sensitive to MEK162, supporting ongoing clinical trials with MEK162 in N-RAS mutated melanoma.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Blotting, Western; Female; Genes, ras; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Proportional Hazards Models; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Tumor Cells, Cultured