binaltorphimine and Pain

Previous work has demonstrated that 3 pharmacologically and neuroanatomically distinct analgesia systems can be sequentially activated by increasing numbers of transcutaneous tail-shock. To date, the categorization of the early (after 2 tail-shocks) and late (after 80-100 tail-shocks) analgesias as opiate-mediated has been based on the ability of systemic naltrexone and morphine tolerance to block these effects. In contrast, the analgesia observed after 5-40 tail-shocks is unaffected by these manipulations, leading to its categorization as non-opiate. The preceding companion paper and the present work were aimed at identifying the neuroanatomical loci at which opiates exert their analgesic effects in this tail-shock paradigm and, further, to identify which opiate receptor subtypes are involved. The 8 experiments included in the present paper examined the effect of microinjecting either naltrexone (a relatively non-selective opiate receptor antagonist), binaltorphimine (kappa receptor antagonist), Cys2-Tyr3-Orn5-Pen7-amide (CTOP) (mu receptor antagonist), or naltrindole (delta receptor antagonist) either into the third ventricle or over the frontal cortex. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that the late (80-100 shock) opiate analgesia is mediated by delta opiate receptors located within subcortical structures rostral to the 4th ventricle. No evidence for supraspinal opiate involvement in the early (2 shock) opiate analgesia was found.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cerebral Ventricles; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electroshock; Indoles; Injections, Intraventricular; Injections, Spinal; Male; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, delta; Spinal Cord

Previous work has demonstrated that 3 pharmacologically and neuroanatomically distinct analgesia systems can be sequentially activated by increasing numbers of transcutaneous tail-shock. To date, the categorization of the early (after 2 tail-shocks) and late (after 80-100 tail-shocks) analgesias as opiate-mediated has been based on the ability of systemic naltrexone and morphine tolerance to block these effects. In contrast, the analgesia observed after 5-40 tail-shocks is unaffected by these manipulations, leading to its categorization as non-opiate. The present work and the following companion paper were aimed at identifying the neuroanatomical loci at which endogenous opiates exert their analgesic effects in this tail-shock paradigm and, further, to identify which opiate receptor subtypes are involved. The 3 experiments included in the present paper focus on the role of spinal opiates in tail-shock induced analgesia. The first experiment demonstrates that the tail-shock parameters used do not directly activate pain suppressive circuitry within the spinal cord, but rather activate centrifugal pain modulation circuitry originating within the brain. The last two experiments examine the effect of intrathecal microinjection of either naltrexone (a relatively non-selective opiate receptor antagonist), binaltorphimine (kappa receptor antagonist), Cys2-Tyr3-Orn5-Pen7-amide (CTOP) (mu receptor antagonist), or naltrindole (delta receptor antagonist). Taken together, these latter 2 experiments demonstrate that both the early (after 2 shocks) and late (after 80-100 shocks) opiate analgesias are mediated by kappa opiate receptors within the spinal cord.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electroshock; Indoles; Injections, Spinal; Male; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Somatostatin; Spinal Cord

The modulatory effects of intrathecally (i.t.) administered dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-13) on morphine antinociception have been studied previously in rats by other investigators. However, both potentiating and attenuating effects have been reported. In this study, the modulatory effects of i.t. administered dynorphin A(1-17) as well as the smaller fragment, dynorphin A(1-8), were studied in mice. In addition, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, and naltrindole (NTI), a highly selective delta opioid receptor antagonist, were used to characterize the possible involvement of spinal kappa and delta opioid receptors in the modulatory effects of the dynorphins. Dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8) administered i.t. at doses that did not alter tail-flick latencies, were both able to antagonize in a dose-dependent manner, the antinociceptive action of s.c. administered morphine sulfate. The antinociceptive ED50 of morphine sulfate was increased 3.9- and 5.3-fold by 0.4 nmol/mouse of dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8), respectively. Injections of 0.4 and 0.8 nmol/mouse of nor-BNI i.t., but not its inactive enantiomer (+)-1-nor-BNI, inhibited dose-dependently the antagonistic effects of the dynorphins. These doses of nor-BNI alone did not affect the antinociceptive action of morphine sulfate. Intrathecal administration of 5 nmol/mouse of NTI also did not affect the modulatory effects of dynorphins. These observations that dynorphins exert their antagonistic effects on morphine-induced antinociception stereoselectively through spinal kappa opioid receptors may suggest a coupling between spinal kappa and mu opioid receptors.

Topics: Animals; Dynorphins; Indoles; Male; Mice; Morphinans; Morphine; Naltrexone; Pain; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, delta; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Spine; Stereoisomerism