bimatoprost and Conjunctival-Diseases

Despite the fact that cosmetic products undergo rigorous testing to ensure they are safe for human use, some users report mild discomfort following their application. The cutaneous changes, such as allergic dermatitis, are well reported, but the ocular changes associated with eye cosmetic use are less so. Some pigmented cosmetic products may accumulate within the lacrimal system and conjunctivae over many years of use, but immediate reports of eye discomfort after application are most common. Changes to the tear film and its stability may occur shortly after application, and contact lens wearers can also be affected by lens spoliation from cosmetic products. Additionally, creams used in the prevention of skin aging are often applied around the eyes, and retinoids present in these formulations can have negative effects on meibomian gland function and may be a contributing factor to dry eye disease. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge regarding the impact of cosmetic products on the eye, ocular surface, and tear film.

Topics: Allergens; Animals; Antioxidants; Bimatoprost; Blepharitis; Conjunctiva; Conjunctival Diseases; Contact Lenses; Contraindications; Cosmetics; Dry Eye Syndromes; Eye; Eye Infections; Humans; Lacrimal Apparatus; Meibomian Glands; Mites; Retinoids; Skin; Surface-Active Agents; Tears

To conduct a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in order to evaluate the development of conjunctival hyperaemia after the use of latanoprost versus travoprost and bimatoprost, in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.. In order to identify the potentially relevant RCTs, a systematic literature retrieval was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1995-April 2007) databases The outcome measure was the appearance of conjunctival hyperaemia during the study. Statistical analyses included the calculation of odds ratio (OR) and its respective confidence interval, along with intertrial statistical heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated through a funnel plot, and a sensitivity analysis was also performed.. In total, 13 RCTs involving 2222 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma were included, five comparing latanoprost versus travoprost, seven comparing latanoprost versus bimatoprost and one comparing latanoprost versus travoprost and bimatoprost. The combined results showed that latanoprost produced lower occurrence of conjunctival hyperaemia than both travoprost (OR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.67, p<0.0001) and bimatoprost (OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.42, p<0.0001). No significant heterogeneity was found between the included RCTs. There was no evidence of publication bias. In the sensitivity analysis performed, none of the clinical trials included in this meta-analysis has an important impact in the global estimation of OR.. According to available data, the use of latanoprost is associated with a lower incidence of conjunctival hyperaemia when compared with travoprost and bimatoprost in the treatment of patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.

Topics: Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctival Diseases; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Hyperemia; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Travoprost

Bimatoprost, a synthetic prostamide analogue, is a new ocular hypotensive agent indicated for the second-line treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The drug is formulated as a 0.03% ophthalmic solution. Bimatoprost lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing aqueous humour outflow. When applied topically once daily in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma, bimatoprost 0.03% significantly reduced IOP. Mean IOP was reduced by approximately 7.5 to 9.2mm Hg 12 hours after drug administration in randomised clinical trials. The reduction in IOP was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval. Once-daily treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% was found to be significantly more effective than timolol 0.5% (administered twice daily as an ophthalmic solution or once daily as a gel-forming solution) in randomised comparative trials in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Furthermore, after 1 to 6 months' treatment, the percentage of patients reaching a target IOP of < or =17mm Hg was significantly greater in the bimatoprost-treated groups than in those receiving timolol. Bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution was found to be at least as effective as topical latanoprost 0.005% administered once daily in two clinical trials. Reductions in IOP 16 and 20 hours postdose were greater in patients treated with bimatoprost, indicating superior control of IOP at timepoints throughout the dosage interval. In patients refractory to beta-blocker therapy, treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% produced greater reductions in diurnal IOP measurements than combination therapy with topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%; approximately twice as many bimatoprost 0.03% recipients achieved an IOP of < or =16mm Hg. The most commonly reported adverse effect during clinical trials of once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% was conjunctival hyperaemia which occurred in 42 to 46% of patients treated. However, most cases were mild and only 1 to 4% of patients withdrew from treatment as a result. Overall withdrawal rates as a result of adverse events during clinical trials ranged from 2.6 to 7%. Bimatoprost has been reported to cause changes in the pigmentation of the periorbital skin, eyelashes and iris, and increase eyelash growth. The long-term consequences of these effects are unknown. Cardiopulmonary adverse effects, which have been associated with the use of beta-blockers such as timolol, were not reported in clinical trials of bimatoprost. Thus, in clinical trials o

Topics: Administration, Topical; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctival Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Lipids; Ocular Hypertension; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Treatment Outcome

There has been increased attention on the potential impact of the preservative benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the ocular surface. This study compared the ocular surface tolerability of once-daily bimatoprost 0.01% and latanoprost 0.005% (both preserved with 0.02% BAK), and travoprost 0.004% preserved with sofZia™.. A randomized, multicenter (15 sites), investigator-masked study enrolled patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who had received latanoprost monotherapy for at least 1 month. Patients were randomized to oncedaily bimatoprost (n = 56), travoprost (n = 53), or latanoprost (n = 55) monotherapy for 3 months. Follow-up visits were at weeks 1, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was physician-graded conjunctival hyperemia (scale 0 to 3) at week 12. Secondary outcomes included corneal staining (scale 0 to 3) and tear break-up time (TBUT).. There were no significant differences in mean (standard deviation [SD]) outcome measures including conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.48 [0.52], travoprost: 0.49 [0.52], latanoprost: 0.51 [0.54]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.49], travoprost: 0.25 [0.46], latanoprost: 0.24 [0.45]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [6.1], travoprost: 9.5 s [5.8], latanoprost: 9.8 s [5.0]) among subjects at latanoprost-treated baseline (P ≥ 0.664). At week 12, there were no significant differences in conjunctival hyperemia (bimatoprost: 0.42 [0.48], travoprost: 0.46 [0.44], latanoprost: 0.44 [0.57]), corneal staining (bimatoprost: 0.31 [0.45], travoprost: 0.32 [0.48], latanoprost: 0.22 [0.30]), or TBUT (bimatoprost: 9.7 s [5.7], travoprost 9.7 s [5.0], latanoprost: 9.3 s [4.0]) among the treatment groups (P ≥ 0.379). At week 1, there was a statistically significant among-group difference in mean change from baseline in hyperemia (+0.04, bimatoprost; +0.20, travoprost; 0.00, latanoprost; P = 0.018). There were no statistically significant among-group differences in mean corneal staining, mean TBUT, or change from baseline at any visit.. Despite preservative differences, there were no significant differences in objective clinical measures of ocular surface tolerability after 3 months of treatment with bimatoprost (with 0.02% BAK), travoprost (with sofZia), and latanoprost (with 0.02% BAK).

Topics: Aged; Amides; Benzalkonium Compounds; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctival Diseases; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Hyperemia; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Travoprost

Bimatoprost 0.03% has been shown to consistently reduce mean intraocular pressure (IOP) more than timolol 0.5% over 2 years. To further evaluate long-term safety and efficacy, once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% was compared with timolol 0.5% twice daily through year 4.. In this multicentre, double-masked, randomised, controlled trial, glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients (n = 152) who completed phase III bimatoprost trials through month 36 were enrolled in a study extension through month 48. Patients randomised to bimatoprost once daily (n = 78) or timolol twice daily (n = 35) continued on the same regimen for a fourth year. Patients randomised to bimatoprost twice daily had been switched to bimatoprost once daily dosing at month 24 (bimatoprost twice daily/once daily treatment group), and continued with once daily dosing through month 48 (n = 39). IOP was measured at 08:00 and 10:00 at months 39, 42, 45 and 48. Safety measures included adverse events, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity and visual field.. Baseline IOP was comparable among groups. During year 4, mean IOP reductions from baseline were 7.0 to 8.1 mm Hg with bimatoprost once daily and 6.5 to 7.9 mm Hg with bimatoprost twice daily/once daily, significantly greater than with timolol twice daily (3.8 to 5.8 mm Hg, p< or =0.035) at all measurements. Over 4 years, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 08:00 and 10:00 was 1.9 to 3.9 mm Hg (35% to 100%) greater with bimatoprost once daily than with timolol (p< or =0.013). Low IOPs were achieved by more bimatoprost than timolol patients (p< or =0.042). No safety concerns developed during long-term bimatoprost treatment; two patients in the timolol treatment group discontinued after month 36 because of adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse event in the bimatoprost treatment groups was conjunctival hyperaemia.. Bimatoprost once daily provided sustained IOP lowering greater than timolol twice daily and was well tolerated over long-term use.

Topics: Amides; Analysis of Variance; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctival Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Timolol; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity

To evaluate conjunctival hyperemia after short-term use of latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in normal adults.. Prospective, randomized, double-masked crossover active controlled comparison.. We evaluated conjunctival hyperemia by a standard photographic measure at the slit lamp and by anterior segment photographs in healthy subjects after dosing for 5 days with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost. Conjunctival hyperemia was evaluated at 24-hour trough (hour 0) and at hour 1 after dosing. Each subject was crossed over between periods after a 1-week washout interval.. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age 26 +/- 9 years) completed this study. Several comparisons were noted to be significant between groups by slit-lamp biomicroscopy: first, at hour 0 latanoprost had significantly less hyperemia than bimatoprost; second, at hour 0 latanoprost showed significantly less change than bimatoprost compared with the study baseline (visit 2); third, at hour 1 latanoprost had significantly less hyperemia than travoprost; fourth, at hour 1 latanoprost demonstrated significantly less change from baseline in hyperemia than travoprost (visit 2); fifth, at hour 1 latanoprost had less change in hyperemia than bimatoprost or travoprost between the study and the nonstudy eye (P = .03); and last, at hour 1 latanoprost showed significantly less change than bimatoprost and travoprost compared with hour 0 (P = .04). Additionally, similar grades were observed by photographs with latanoprost demonstrating the lowest levels of hyperemia. Subjects complained less about other people noticing their red eye with latanoprost than bimatoprost or travoprost (P = .048). No serious adverse events were noted.. This study suggests that latanoprost may cause significantly less short-term conjunctival hyperemia on average than bimatoprost or travoprost in healthy subjects.

Topics: Adult; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctiva; Conjunctival Diseases; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hyperemia; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Lipids; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Time Factors; Travoprost

Preservatives in glaucoma medications have been associated with ocular toxicity. We compared ocular signs and symptoms in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension treated in monotherapy with preserved or preservative-free prostaglandin analogues.. Observational cross-sectional clinical study in real life. 82 patients treated for at least 6 months with prostaglandin analogue were assessed for intraocular pressure, ocular symptoms and ocular signs including conjunctival hyperaemia, tear break-up time and tear meniscus height measured using objective and non-invasive methods (OCULUS Keratograph 5M). Patients presenting with symptoms of ocular toxicity with preserved prostaglandin analogues were switched to preservative-free latanoprost, and a second assessment was processed 6 months after.. At inclusion, 30 (36.6%) patients were treated with preservative-free latanoprost, 25 (30.5%) with preserved latanoprost, 16 (19.5%) with preserved travoprost and 11 (13.4%) with preserved bimatoprost. Patients treated with preservative-free latanoprost reported significantly less ocular symptoms upon instillation (mainly burning) and between instillations than patients treated with preserved prostaglandin analogues. The mean conjunctival hyperaemia (limbal + bulbar) was significantly lower with preservative-free latanoprost (2.08 ± 0.55) compared to preserved latanoprost (2.50 ± 0.7, p = 0.0085), preserved travoprost (2.67 ± 0.82, p = 0.0083) and preserved bimatoprost (2.68 ± 0.67, p = 0.0041). There were no relevant between-group differences in mean tear meniscus height and break-up time. Ocular symptoms and conjunctival hyperaemia improved when preserved prostaglandin analogues were switched to preservative-free latanoprost for 6 months while intraocular pressure reduction was maintained.. Overall, this study suggests a better subjective and objective ocular tolerance when patients were treated with preservative-free latanoprost than with other preserved prostaglandin analogues monotherapy. Switching to preservative-free latanoprost maintained intraocular pressure at the same level as preservative prostaglandin analogue, but improved ocular surface tolerance.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Conjunctival Diseases; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Hyperemia; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Tonometry, Ocular; Travoprost

To report the clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated with bimatoprost 0.03% therapy.. Two hundred sixty-three Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension who needed initial or additional intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering were recruited in this prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical study and were treated with bimatoprost 0.03%. Patients received bimatoprost 0.03% as initial, replacement or adjunctive IOP-lowering therapy, and follow-up visits were performed at week 1, and month 1 and 3 of the bimatoprost treatment. The efficacy outcome measure was the post-treatment IOP level. The safety outcome measures included the rate of medication-related symptoms, physical signs, reported adverse events, and the level of conjunctival hyperemia.. Among 240 patients who could be categorized by pre-existing therapies and the bimatoprost therapy regimen in the study, IOP values observed in all medication conditions showed significant IOP reduction at all study visits compared with baseline. At 3 months, 8.0 ± 3.7 mmHg (32.0%) reduction in IOP was observed in treatment-naive patients after bimatoprost monotherapy; in the patients previously on various therapy regimens, 1.9 ± 2.8 mmHg (9.5%) to 6.4 ± 6.1 mmHg (24.8%) additional IOP lowering was achieved after switching to bimatoprost monotherapy or bimatoprost combination therapy. The most common adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, mainly of trace and mild intensity.. Our results show that bimatoprost 0.03% was effective in lowering IOP with favorable safety in Chinese primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; China; Cloprostenol; Conjunctival Diseases; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Hyperemia; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Prospective Studies

To investigate the toxic-inflammatory effects of prostaglandin analogs on the ocular surface.. Twenty-three rats were divided into four groups. Bimatoprost 0.03% (I), latanoprost 0.005% (II), and travoprost 0.004% (III) were applied during 6 months; a control group (IV) received no treatment. Dysplasia and keratinization were evaluated on the ocular surface. In the subepithelial area, the number of lymphocytes and mast cells were counted morphologically, and collagen staining densities were compared subjectively in groups.. The ratio of keratinization was 3/12 and 1/10, in groups I and II. The lymphocyte cell counts were 1.4 ± 0.19, 2.2 ± 0.39, 2.27 ± 0.33, and 1.87 ± 0.35 (p > .05). The mast cell counts were 2.58 ± 0.5, 5.4 ± 1.1, 5.7 ± 0.58, and 3.0 ± 0.59. They were significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < .05). Mean collagen density scores were 1.00 ± 0.85, 2.00 ± 0.00, and 1,73 ± 0.70. Group II and III scores were higher than group I scores (p < .05).. Latanoprost and travoprost seem to have more toxic-inflammatory effects on the ocular surface than bimatoprost.

Topics: Amides; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctiva; Conjunctival Diseases; Cornea; Corneal Diseases; Disease Models, Animal; Follow-Up Studies; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Prostaglandins, Synthetic; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Travoprost

To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of automated software to analyze human bulbar hyperemia.. We enrolled 89 healthy volunteers in this study. A slit lamp was used to take pictures of the conjunctiva on the temporal side of each subject's right eye. Photographic conditions were standardized by using a single photographer. Images were transferred to software for automatic pixel value calculation in the green channel of the region of interest (ROI). We investigated optimal ROI size, mean ROI pixel frequency, percentage ROI blood vessel coverage, and data reproducibility. We also used this software to evaluate bimatoprost-induced hyperemia and hyperemia in allergic conjunctival diseases.. The optimal ROI was found to be 400 vertical pixels by 300 horizontal pixels. Mean ROI pixel frequency was 5305 and % coverage was 4.4%. We confirmed the reproducibility of the analysis by comparing two images (r (2) = 0.7, P < 0.0001). Percentage blood vessel coverage increased in images of bimatoprost-induced hyperemia and hyperemia in allergic conjunctival diseases compared to the data from healthy volunteers.. The software was simple to use and provided reproducible data. We established standard settings for the operation of the software. The use of our software will improve hyperemia evaluation, which is presently done using nonquantitative methods.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Amides; Bimatoprost; Cloprostenol; Conjunctiva; Conjunctival Diseases; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Humans; Hyperemia; Middle Aged; Pattern Recognition, Automated; Photography; Reproducibility of Results; Software; Young Adult