betadex and Osteoarthritis

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most widely used agents in the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). No data are presently available on the medium-term management of this disease with an on-demand treatment regimen, which nevertheless reflects medical practice.. The aim of this study was to compare nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin and naproxen in terms of short-term (2 weeks) pain control with scheduled dosing and medium-term (5.5 months) pain control with on-demand dosing in patients with OA.. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we compared 2 weeks of scheduled treatment plus 5.5 months of on-demand treatment in patients with OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, with no important concomitant disorders. Treatment consisted of nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin (400 mg BID, orally = 100 mg nimesulide BID) or naproxen (500 mg BID). The primary outcome measures for scheduled dosing were pain on movement (measured by visual analog scale), morning stiffness score, Lequesne index, and adverse events. For on-demand dosing, the measures were the same as for scheduled dosing, plus duration of treatment and global assessment of efficacy and tolerability by patient and physician.. After 2 weeks, there was equivalent reduction from baseline in pain on movement in the 2 treatment groups (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, -41.5%; naproxen, -40.5%); the reduction was significant after 1 week (P < 0.001). The findings were also similar for the morning stiffness score and Lequesne index. There were no significant differences in mean duration of on-demand treatment (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, 163.03 days; naproxen, 166.3 days) or in mean consumption of study drug (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, 0.85 +/- 0.61 sachets/d; naproxen, 0.74 +/- 0.42 sachets/d). Withdrawal due to intolerance occurred in 8 patients given nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin and 13 patients given naproxen, with no significant difference between groups; 3 and 12 patients, respectively, withdrew due to gastrointestinal intolerance, a finding that was significantly different between groups (P < 0.01). Global assessment of efficacy by patient and physician was similar for both drugs. Assessment of tolerability significantly favored nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin on the physician assessments (P < 0.05) but was similar for the 2 drugs on the patient assessments (physicians, 46.9% vs 30.9%; patients, 43.5% vs 33.3%).. The results suggest that nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin provides similar pain relief to naproxen in the management of OA of the hip and/or knee and is associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse reactions. On-demand dosing may be an effective and well-tolerated low-dose regimen of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the maintenance of pain control in OA in the medium term.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; beta-Cyclodextrins; Cyclodextrins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naproxen; Osteoarthritis; Pain Measurement; Sulfonamides

Efficacy and safety of nimesulide as well as favourable tolerability have been tested in osteoarthritis in short term study and post-marketing survey. Here is a report which shows the superiority of nimesulide complexed with betacyclodextrin vs ninesulide tablet in osteoarthritis in a long term study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; beta-Cyclodextrins; Cyclodextrins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; India; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The clinical relevance of piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin (PBC) in the long-term treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis is reviewed. Two hundred and twenty-five patients--one hundred with rheumatoid arthritis and one hundred and twenty five with osteoarthritis--were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, controlled study versus piroxicam. Drugs were administered once-daily, for twelve weeks. The indices of efficacy (pain intensity, severity of inflammation, functional impairment evaluated at 0,2,4,8 and 12 weeks showed the good analgesic effect of piroxicam without significant differences between its two formulations. Tolerance appeared to be better in the group of patients treated with PBC than in the one treated with piroxicam. Both the incidence and severity of side effects were lower for patients treated with PBC. The majority of side effects were related to the gastrointestinal tract. The study suggests that PBC, used in the long term treatment of rheumatic diseases, improves the safety of piroxicam without affecting its efficacy. In another study, thirty patients with chronic osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to receive PBC or tenoxicam daily for eight weeks. Both drugs effectively reduced pain, inflammation, and functional limitation of the affected joints. Endoscopy revealed minor post-treatment mucosal lesions; these tended to be less severe with PBC than with tenoxicam. The clinical experience in the long-term treatment of rheumatic conditions indicates that the microencapsulation of piroxicam as piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin has provided a new drug with a superior tolerability compared to the parent compound without affecting its high efficacy on the symptoms of the primary disease.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; beta-Cyclodextrins; Cyclodextrins; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Piroxicam

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Awards and Prizes; beta-Cyclodextrins; Cyclodextrins; Drug Combinations; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Piroxicam