benzofurans and Thrombocytopenia

Histone deacetylase inhibitors are members of a class of epigenetic drugs that have proven activity in T-cell malignancies, but little is known about their efficacy in B-cell lymphomas. Abexinostat is an orally available hydroxamate-containing histone deacetylase inhibitor that differs from approved inhibitors; its unique pharmacokinetic profile and oral dosing schedule, twice daily four hours apart, allows for continuous exposure at concentrations required to efficiently kill tumor cells. In this phase II study, patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia received oral abexinostat at 80 mg BID for 14 days of a 21-day cycle and continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 100 patients with B-cell malignancies and T-cell lymphomas were enrolled between October 2011 and July 2014. All patients received at least one dose of study drug. Primary reasons for discontinuation included progressive disease (56%) and adverse events (25%). Grade 3 or over adverse events and any serious adverse events were reported in 88% and 73% of patients, respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or over treatment-emergent related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (80%), neutropenia (27%), and anemia (12%). Among the 87 patients evaluable for efficacy, overall response rate was 28% (complete response 5%), with highest responses observed in patients with follicular lymphoma (overall response rate 56%), T-cell lymphoma (overall response rate 40%), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (overall response rate 31%). Further investigation of the safety and efficacy of abexinostat in follicular lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma implementing a less dose-intense week-on-week-off schedule is warranted. (

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzofurans; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetylation; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Benzofurans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epigenesis, Genetic; Fatigue; Female; Gene Expression; Histone Deacetylase 2; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Histones; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Young Adult

In the clinical development of oncology drugs, the recommended dose is usually determined using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation study design. However, this phase I design does not always adequately describe dose-toxicity relationships.. 125 patients, with either solid tumours or lymphoma, were included in the study and 1217 platelet counts were available over three treatment cycles. The data was used to build a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model using a sequential modeling approach. Model-derived Recommended Doses (MDRD) of abexinostat (a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor) were determined from simulations of different administration schedules, and the higher bound for the probability of reaching these MDRD with a 3 + 3 design were obtained.. The PKPD model developed adequately described platelet kinetics in both patient populations with the inclusion of two platelet baseline counts and a disease progression component for patients with lymphoma. Simulation results demonstrated that abexinostat administration during the first 4 days of each week in a 3-week cycle led to a higher MDRD compared to the other administration schedules tested, with a maximum probability of 40 % of reaching these MDRDs using a 3 + 3 design.. The PKPD model was able to predict thrombocytopenia following abexinostat administration in both patient populations. A model-based approach to determine the recommended dose in phase I trials is preferable due to the imprecision of the 3 + 3 design.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Thrombocytopenia

Abexinostat, an oral pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), was evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumours in two single agent phase I studies (PCYC-402 and CL1-78454-002). In PCYC-402 study testing four different administration schedules, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at 75 mg/m(2) BID (twice daily) and the recommended dose at 60 mg/m(2) BID regardless of the schedule tested. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT), consistently observed across all these schedules, was reversible thrombocytopenia. The CL1-78454-002 study was initially investigating an additional schedule of 14 days on/7 days off. While testing two first cohorts, thrombocytopenia was observed without reaching DLT. To address this issue, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was used to predict the optimal schedule allowing higher doses with minimal thrombocytopenia. Several administration schedules were simulated using this model. A 4 days on/3 days off schedule was associated with the smallest platelet decrease. Accordingly, the CL1-78454-002 study was amended. After reaching MTD1 (75 mg/m(2) BID) with the initial schedule, subsequent cohorts received abexinostat on a revised schedule of 4 days on/3 days off, starting at one dose level below MTD1 (60 mg/m(2) BID). As expected, the dose-escalation continued for two more dose levels beyond MTD1. The MTD2 reached for this optimised schedule was 105 mg/m(2) BID and the recommended dose 90 mg/m(2) BID. In conclusion, early understanding of toxicities and PK determination allowed us to build a PK/PD model of thrombocytopenia, which predicted the optimal administration schedule. This optimised schedule is currently used in the trials in solid tumours with abexinostat.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Benzofurans; Computer Simulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; France; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Platelet Count; Thrombocytopenia

Carzelesin is a cyclopropylpyrroloindole analogue which acts as a DNA-sequence-specific alkylating agent. In this phase I study, Carzelesin was given as a 4-weekly 10 min i.v. infusion to 51 patients with advanced solid tumours. Patients received a median of two courses (range 1-5) at one of nine dose levels: 24, 48, 96, 130, 150, 170, 210, 250 and 300 microg m(-2). According to NCI-CTC criteria, non-haematological toxicities (grade 1/2) included fever, nausea and vomiting, mucositis and anorexia, none of which was clearly dose related. The dose-limiting toxicity was haematological and consisted mainly of neutropenia and to a lesser extent thrombocytopenia. From the dose level 150 microg m(-2), the haematological toxicity (particularly thrombocytopenia) was delayed in onset, prolonged and cumulative in some patients. In several courses, double WBC nadirs occurred. The maximum tolerated dose for a single course was 300 microg m(-2). From the dose level 170 microg m(-2), the intended dose intensity could not be delivered to most patients receiving > 2 courses owing to cumulative haematological toxicity. The dose level with the best dose intensity for multiple courses was 150 microg m(-2). The pharmacokinetics of Carzelesin and its metabolites (U-76,073; U-76,074) have been established in 31 patients during the first course of treatment using a HPLC method. Carzelesin exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. The concentration of U-76,074 (active metabolite) extended above the lower limit of quantitation (1 ng ml(-1)) for short periods of time and only at the higher dose levels. There was no relationship between neutropenia and the AUC of the prodrug Carzelesin, but the presence of detectable plasma levels of the active metabolite U-76,074 was usually associated with a substantial decrease in ANC values.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzofurans; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Duocarmycins; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prodrugs; Thrombocytopenia

Carzelesin (U-80244), one of the synthetic DNA minor groove binding cyclopropylpyrroloindole analogues, was selected for clinical development because of its high potency, promising antitumor activity in murine solid tumors and leukemia, and significant therapeutic efficacy against colon and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. In this Phase I study, carzelesin was given daily for 5 consecutive days to (a) determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and the pattern of toxicity of this schedule; (b) define the pharmacokinetic profile of the parent, as was done for the intermediate compound U-76073 and the DNA-reactive agent U-76074; and (c) document any antitumor activity observed. Carzelesin was given as a 10-min infusion with a constant-rate infusion pump. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks or when blood counts had recovered to normal values. The starting dose of 12 microgram/m2/day was escalated by 20-30% increments until the MTD (defined as the dose leading to grade 4 hematological or grade 3 nonhematological toxicity in at least two of six patients) was reached. Pharmacokinetic studies were planned on days 1 and 5 of the first cycle in at least two patients per dose level. Plasma levels of carzelesin, U-76073, and U-76074 were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection and a detection limit of 0.5 ng/ml. Twenty-five patients were entered in the study, and 56 cycles were evaluable for hematological toxicity. Subsequent dose levels evaluated were 24, 30, 35, and 40 microgram/m2. Both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting and cumulative, with a high interpatient variability. Neutropenia occurred earlier (median time to neutrophil nadir and recovery, 15 and 29 days, respectively) than thrombocytopenia (median time to platelet nadir and recovery, 25 and >/=26 days, respectively); there were delays of treatment because of persisting thrombocytopenia in all patients treated at the MTD. At the MTD, the peak plasma concentrations of carzelesin were achieved at the end of the infusion and were higher than those found cytotoxic in vitro against tumor cell lines. Carzelesin was detectable up to a maximum of 1 h after the infusion. Smaller amounts of U-76073 were detectable for a maximum of 30 min only at the MTD, whereas U-76074 was never found. An 8-month partial remission was reported in one previously untreated patient with hepatocellular carcinoma at 40 microgram/m2. The MTD was fixed at 40 microgram/m2 daily; 35 and 30 micro

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Benzofurans; Bronchial Spasm; Drug Administration Schedule; Duocarmycins; Female; Flushing; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Tachycardia; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was developed to describe the thrombocytopenia (dose-limiting toxicity) of abexinostat, a new histone deacetylase inhibitor. An optimal administration schedule of the drug was determined using a simulation-based approach.. Early PK and PK/PD data were analysed using a sequential population modeling approach (NONMEM 7), allowing for the description of a PK profile and platelet-count decrease after abexinostat administration with various administration schedules. Simulations of platelet count with several administration schedules over 3-week treatment cycles (ASC) and over a day (ASD) were computed to define the optimal schedule that limits the depth of thrombocytopenia.. An intermediate PK/PD model accurately described the data. The administration of abexinostat during the first 4 days of each week in a 3-week cycle resulted in fewer adverse events (with no influence of ASD on platelet count profiles), and corresponded to the optimal treatment schedule. This administration schedule was clinically evaluated in a phase I clinical trial and allowed for the definition of a new maximum tolerated dose (MTD), leading to a nearly 30% higher dose-intensity than that of another previously tested schedule. Lastly, a final model was built using all of the available data.. The final model, characterizing the dose-effect and the dose-toxicity relationships, provides a useful modeling tool for clinical drug development.

Topics: Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Computer Simulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Models, Biological; Platelet Count; Thrombocytopenia

Abexinostat is a pan histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) that demonstrates efficacy in malignancy treatment. Like other HDACi, this drug induces a profound thrombocytopenia whose mechanism is only partially understood. We have analyzed its effect at doses reached in patient plasma on in vitro megakaryopoiesis derived from human CD34(+) cells. When added at day 0 in culture, abexinostat inhibited CFU-MK growth, megakaryocyte (MK) proliferation and differentiation. These effects required only a short incubation period. Decreased proliferation was due to induction of apoptosis and was not related to a defect in TPO/MPL/JAK2/STAT signaling. When added later (day 8), the compound induced a dose-dependent decrease (up to 10-fold) in proplatelet (PPT) formation. Gene profiling from MK revealed a silencing in the expression of DNA repair genes with a marked RAD51 decrease at protein level. DNA double-strand breaks were increased as attested by elevated γH2AX phosphorylation level. Moreover, ATM was phosphorylated leading to p53 stabilization and increased BAX and p21 expression. The use of a p53 shRNA rescued apoptosis, and only partially the defect in PPT formation. These results suggest that HDACi induces a thrombocytopenia by a p53-dependent mechanism along MK differentiation and a p53-dependent and -independent mechanism for PPT formation.

Topics: Acetylation; Benzofurans; Cell Growth Processes; DNA Repair; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Phosphorylation; Signal Transduction; Thrombocytopenia; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Some new alkylating agents which bind to the minor groove of DNA and have sequence-specific patterns of alkylation have shown anti-neoplastic activity in pre-clinical systems. Two of them, carzelesin and tallimustine, are now in phase II. Considering the severe dose-limiting bone marrow toxicity of both these drugs in clinical use, it was of interest to investigate the mechanism of their myelotoxicity in a detailed pre-clinical study and compare it with a conventional alkylating agent, such as melphalan. The origin and progression of the myelotoxicity of carzelesin, tallimustine and melphalan were investigated comparatively in mice, combining data on bone marrow and peripheral blood cellularity with data on the proliferative activity of bone marrow cells, obtained by in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine. Significant differences were found between the hematopoietic response to the 3 drugs, though all caused severe leukopenia. Carzelesin induced a short-term increase in myeloid proliferative activity, which prevented the high leukocytopenia on day 3 observed with the other drugs. However, when this effect was exhausted, a second nadir was seen in peripheral blood, with a new wave of cell proliferation of all lineages in the bone marrow. Reconstruction of the lymphoid lineage was slow for all 3 drugs but particularly difficult with high-dose tallimustine. In general, the hematopoietic system response to tallimustine was dampened, with no overshoots, suggesting either lasting effects or extensive cytotoxicity from the early to late precursors of all lineages.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Benzofurans; Body Weight; Bone Marrow Cells; Cell Cycle; Cell Division; Distamycins; Duocarmycins; Flow Cytometry; Indoles; Leukocyte Count; Male; Melphalan; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Neutropenia; Nitrogen Mustard Compounds; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia