benazepril and Albuminuria

benazepril has been researched along with Albuminuria* in 18 studies

Trials

14 trial(s) available for benazepril and Albuminuria

ArticleYear
Preventing microalbuminuria with benazepril, valsartan, and benazepril-valsartan combination therapy in diabetic patients with high-normal albuminuria: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study.
    PLoS medicine, 2021, Volume: 18, Issue:7

    Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients. We assessed whether combined therapy with the 2 medications may prevent microalbuminuria better than ACE inhibitor or ARB monotherapy.. VARIETY was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial evaluating whether, at similar blood pressure (BP) control, combined therapy with benazepril (10 mg/day) and valsartan (160 mg/day) would prevent microalbuminuria more effectively than benazepril (20 mg/day) or valsartan (320 mg/day) monotherapy in 612 type 2 diabetic patients with high-normal albuminuria included between July 2007 and April 2013 by the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS and 8 diabetology or nephrology units in Italy. Time to progression to microalbuminuria was the primary outcome. Analyses were intention to treat. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. During a median [interquartile range, IQR] follow-up of 66 [42 to 83] months, 53 patients (27.0%) on combination therapy, 57 (28.1%) on benazepril, and 64 (31.8%) on valsartan reached microalbuminuria. Using an accelerated failure time model, the estimated acceleration factors were 1.410 (95% CI: 0.806 to 2.467, P = 0.229) for benazepril compared to combination therapy, 0.799 (95% CI: 0.422 to 1.514, P = 0.492) for benazepril compared to valsartan, and 1.665 (95% CI: 1.007 to 2.746, P = 0.047) for valsartan compared to combination therapy. Between-group differences in estimated acceleration factors were nonsignificant after adjustment for predefined confounders. BP control was similar across groups. All treatments were safe and tolerated well, with a slight excess of hyperkalemia and hypotension in the combination therapy group. The main study limitation was the lower than expected albuminuria at inclusion.. Risk/benefit profile of study treatments was similar. Dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade is not recommended as compared to benazepril or valsartan monotherapy for prevention of microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients.. EudraCT 2006-005954-62; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00503152.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzazepines; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Valsartan

2021
Addition of aliskiren to Angiotensin receptor blocker improves ambulatory blood pressure profile and cardiorenal function better than addition of benazepril in chronic kidney disease.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2013, Jul-24, Volume: 14, Issue:8

    An altered ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) profile is related to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiorenal syndrome. In this study, we examined the effects of aliskiren, when added to angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, on ambulatory BP and cardiorenal function in CKD. Thirty-six hypertensive CKD patients were randomly assigned to the aliskiren add-on group (n = 18) or the benazepril add-on group (n = 18). Ambulatory BP and cardiorenal function parameters were measured at baseline and 24 weeks after treatment. Compared with the benazepril group, nighttime systolic BP variability in the aliskiren group was lower after treatment. Albuminuria was decreased in the aliskiren group, but not in the benazepril group. In addition, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was significantly lower in the aliskiren group than in the benazepril group after treatment. In the aliskiren group, multivariate linear regression analysis showed an association between changes in albuminuria and changes in nighttime systolic BP. Furthermore, there were associations between changes in LVMI and changes in daytime HR variability, as well as between changes in LVMI and changes in plasma aldosterone concentration. These results suggest that aliskiren add-on therapy may be beneficial for suppression of renal deterioration and pathological cardiac remodeling through an improvement that is effected in ambulatory BP and HR profiles.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amides; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Cardio-Renal Syndrome; Female; Fumarates; Heart Function Tests; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Oxidative Stress; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

2013
Optimized project of traditional Chinese medicine in treating chronic kidney disease stage 3: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2012, Feb-15, Volume: 139, Issue:3

    Stage 3 is the key phase of chronic kidney disease. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used for the treatment of chronic kidney disease. But a large sample trial is desirable.. A total of 578 Chinese patients with primary glomerulonephritis in CKD stage 3 were randomly assigned to three groups: patients received TCM (TCM group), benazepril (Ben group), TCM combined with benazepril (TCM+Ben group). Patients were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the time to the composite of 50% increased of serum creatinine, end stage renal disease or death.. eGFR in the TCM and the TCM+Ben group were improved (week 24 vs. baseline, P<0.05) while eGFR in the Ben group was decreased (week 24 vs. baseline, P>0.05). 24h urinary protein excretion (UP) and urinary albumin/creatinine (UAlb/Cr) were decreased in the TCM+Ben (week 24 vs. baseline, P<0.05) and the Ben group (week 24 vs. baseline, P>0.05). UP and UAlb/Cr were increased in the TCM group to week 12, then were stable (week 24 vs. baseline, P<0.05). The hemoglobin in the TCM group was also improved (week 24 vs. baseline, P<0.05). The accumulative survival rate in the TCM+Ben group was higher than that in the TCM group and the Ben group (P=0.044). Side effects in the TCM group were the lowest in these groups (P<0.05). The patients with dry cough in the TCM+Ben group and the Ben group were increased as compared with the TCM group (P<0.05). Hyperkalemia happened less frequently in the TCM group as compared with the other two groups (P=0.052).. For the patients with CKD stage 3, TCM can improve eGFR and hemoglobin with lower side effects. Benazepril significantly decreased the proteinuria. Chinese medicine integrated with benazepril can ameliorate renal function and decrease proteinuria synergistically.

    Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Benzazepines; Cough; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glomerulonephritis; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Middle Aged; Phytotherapy; Proteinuria; Severity of Illness Index

2012
Comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of two fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents, amlodipine/benazepril versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a 16-week, multicenter, rando
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Hypertension is a prevalent condition that is closely associated with chronic complications in patients with diabetes. Fixed-dose combination therapy is currently recommended for the treatment of hypertension due to the advantage of reducing the pill burden. However, the effects of combination therapy may be diverse because of the different components.. We examined blood pressure reduction and metabolic alterations after amlodipine/benazepril and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension and microalbuminuria.. This randomized, double-blind, parallel comparison, noninferiority clinical trial included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension and microalbuminuria detected within the past year. After a 2-week, placebo run-in period, patients were assigned to treatment with amlodipine/benazepril or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide for 16 weeks. The primary end point was mean change in diastolic blood pressure. The prespecified boundary for noninferiority was 3.5 mm Hg of the mean change in diastolic blood pressure between treatments (amlodipine/benazepril minus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide). If the upper limit of the 95% CI fell within 3.5 mm Hg, amlodipine/benazepril would be considered noninferior to valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide.. Of the 226 patients assessed for eligibility, 169 satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were assigned to a treatment group; 83 patients (54.2% male, mean age of 60.5 [10.0] years) in the amlodipine/benazepril group and 84 patients (64.3% male, mean age of 59.0 [10.6] years) in the valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide group received at least 1 dose of study medication and were included in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population, amlodipine/benazepril (n = 74) was noninferior to valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (n = 78) with regard to the mean change in diastolic blood pressure (difference, -0.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.5 to 1.6). The mean change in systolic blood pressure was not significantly different (2.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.2 to 6.0) between study groups (P = 0.195) in the per-protocol population. However, data from the intention-to-treat population suggest that patients in the amlodipine/benazepril group may have better metabolic outcomes than those in the valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide group; specifically, a preservation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (5.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) [95% CI, 1.9 to 9.6]; P = 0.004) and improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin (-0.5% [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.2]; P < 0.001), fasting triglycerides (-0.4 mmol/L [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.2]; P = 0.002), HDL-C (0.07 mmol/L [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.12]; P = 0.022), and uric acid (-57.5 μmol/L [95% CI, -74.8 to -40.3]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in adverse effects between groups, with the exception of more respiratory disorders in the amlodipine/benazepril group than in the valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide group (17 vs 5; P = 0 .006).. The study results suggest that amlodipine/benazepril is noninferior to valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide with regard to blood pressure reduction and that this combination exerts beneficial effects on renal function, glucose control, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels compared with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. However, respiratory adverse events (particularly coughing) were more frequently reported in the amlodipine/benazepril group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01375322.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Taiwan; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uric Acid; Valine; Valsartan

2012
Renal outcomes with different fixed-dose combination therapies in patients with hypertension at high risk for cardiovascular events (ACCOMPLISH): a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2010, Apr-03, Volume: 375, Issue:9721

    The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed that initial antihypertensive therapy with benazepril plus amlodipine was superior to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effects of these drug combinations on progression of chronic kidney disease.. ACCOMPLISH was a double-blind, randomised trial undertaken in five countries (USA, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland). 11 506 patients with hypertension who were at high risk for cardiovascular events were randomly assigned via a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to receive benazepril (20 mg) plus amlodipine (5 mg; n=5744) or benazepril (20 mg) plus hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg; n=5762), orally once daily. Drug doses were force-titrated for patients to attain recommended blood pressure goals. Progression of chronic kidney disease, a prespecified endpoint, was defined as doubling of serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or need for dialysis). Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00170950.. The trial was terminated early (mean follow-up 2.9 years [SD 0.4]) because of superior efficacy of benazepril plus amlodipine compared with benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide. At trial completion, vital status was not known for 143 (1%) patients who were lost to follow-up (benazepril plus amlodipine, n=70; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, n=73). All randomised patients were included in the ITT analysis. There were 113 (2.0%) events of chronic kidney disease progression in the benazepril plus amlodipine group compared with 215 (3.7%) in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group (HR 0.52, 0.41-0.65, p<0.0001). The most frequent adverse event in patients with chronic kidney disease was peripheral oedema (benazepril plus amlodipine, 189 of 561, 33.7%; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, 85 of 532, 16.0%). In patients with chronic kidney disease, angio-oedema was more frequent in the benazepril plus amlodipine group than in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group. In patients without chronic kidney disease, dizziness, hypokalaemia, and hypotension were more frequent in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group than in the benazepril plus amlodipine group.. Initial antihypertensive treatment with benazepril plus amlodipine should be considered in preference to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide since it slows progression of nephropathy to a greater extent.. Novartis.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Creatinine; Disease Progression; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

2010
[Effect of combined therapy with bailing capsule and benazepril on urinary albumin excretion rate and C-reactive protein in patients with early diabetic nephropathy].
    Zhongguo Zhong xi yi jie he za zhi Zhongguo Zhongxiyi jiehe zazhi = Chinese journal of integrated traditional and Western medicine, 2009, Volume: 29, Issue:9

    To observe the effect of combined therapy with Bailing Capsule (BC) and benazepril on the levels of urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for exploring its protective effect on early diabetic nephropathy.. Sixty patients with early diabetic nephropathy were randomly assigned to the control group treated by benazepril alone, and the treated group treated by BC and benazepril, and the treatment lasted for 16 weeks. The changes of UAER and CRP levels were measured to estimate the protective effect of the combined therapy.. Levels of 24h urinary protein, UAER, CRP were (0.85 +/- 0.32) g/24 h, (83.34 +/- 38.27) microg/min, (2.67 +/- 1.72) mg/L before treatment in the control group, and (0.43 +/- 0.17) g/24 h, (71.22 +/- 31.12) microg/min, (1.05 +/- 0.78) mg/L after treatment and they were (0.87 +/- 0.31) g/24 h, (81.59 +/- 35.69) microg/min, (2.55 +/- 1.66) mg/L before treatment in treated group, and (0.25 +/- 0.29) g/24 h, (57.32 +/- 31.11) microg/min, (0.49 +/- 0.38) mg/L after treatment respectively, all of them decreased after treatment in both groups, showing significant differences as compared with those before treatment (P<0.05, P< 0.01), and the reduction in the treated group was more significant (P<0.01); meanwhile, levels of serum creatinine, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c had somewhat decrease, showing no statistical difference with those before treatment (P >0.05).. Combined use of BC and benazepril could significantly lower the UAER and CRP levels in patients with early diabetic nephropathy to alleviate the renal impairment, showing an effect better than that of using benazepril alone.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuminuria; Benzazepines; C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phytotherapy

2009
Effects of calcium channel blockers on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:10

    Diabetic nephropathy management should include the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin receptor blocker with additional antihypertensive medications to reduce proteinuria and cardiovascular events. Some studies suggest that adding a nondihydropyridine rather than a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) may more effectively lower proteinuria. We hypothesized that a trandolapril/verapamil SR (T/V) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was superior to a benazepril/amlodipine (B/A) FDC for reducing albuminuria in 304 hypertensive diabetic nephropathy patients when treated for 36 weeks. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the primary end point; adjusted percentage change in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), which increased (mean T/V, 29.29%; mean B/A, 8.49%; difference, 20.80%; P=.34); or in change in absolute UACR, which decreased (mean [g/g] T/V, -0.11; mean [g/g] B/A, -0.08; difference -0.03; P=.78). There were significant reductions in log UACR (mean change in T/V, -0.28; P<.01; mean change in B/A, -0.31; P<.001) and diastolic blood pressure in both groups and in systolic blood pressure in the B/A group. T/V was not superior to B/A for reducing UACR. Both ACEI/CCB FDCs may reduce albuminuria; in the case of T/V, this appears to be independent of systolic blood pressure reduction in patients who had previously been treated and had baseline blood pressure levels of 142/77 mm Hg.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Treatment Outcome; Verapamil

2008
Effects of different ACE inhibitor combinations on albuminuria: results of the GUARD study.
    Kidney international, 2008, Volume: 73, Issue:11

    Clinical practice guidelines recommend blockers of the renin-angiotensin system alone or in combination with other agents to reduce blood pressure and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, however, may lower blood pressure but not albuminuria in these patients. Here we tested the hypothesis that combining an ACE inhibitor with either a thiazide diuretic or a calcium channel blocker will cause similar reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetics. We conducted a double blind randomized controlled trial on 332 hypertensive, albuminuric type 2 diabetic patients treated with benazepril with either amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for 1 year. The trial employed a non-inferiority design. Both combinations significantly reduced the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and sitting blood pressure of the entire cohort. The percentage of patients progressing to overt proteinuria was similar for both groups. When we examined patients who had only microalbuminuria and hypertension we found that a larger percentage of the diuretic and ACE inhibitor normalized their albuminuria. We conclude that initial treatment using benzaepril with a diuretic resulted in a greater reduction in albuminuria compared to the group of ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker. In contrast, blood pressure reduction, particularly the diastolic component, favored the combination with amilodipine. The dissociation between reductions in blood pressure and albuminuria may be related to factors other than blood pressure.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diuretics; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

2008
Rationale and design of a study comparing two fixed-dose combination regimens to reduce albuminuria in patients with type II diabetes and hypertension.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2005, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The early stage of nephropathy is manifested by the presence of low levels of urinary albumin (microalbuminuria or urinary albumin excretion >or=30 and <299 mg/day). Albuminuria is a marker for development of nephropathy in type II diabetes and for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of antihypertensive agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system to reduce the risk and slow down the progression of renal disease. A new clinical trial, GUARD (Gauging Albuminuria Reduction With Lotrel in Diabetic Patients With Hypertension), is designed to compare the change in urinary albumin to creatinine ratio after 1 year of initial treatment with either amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl or benazepril HCl/hydrochlorothiazide. Other objectives include a comparison of the proportion of patients who progress to overt diabetic nephropathy and the safety of these two combination therapies in these high-risk patients.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diuretics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Renin-Angiotensin System; Research Design; Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

2005
Effect of fixed-dose ACE-inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy vs. ACE-inhibitor monotherapy on arterial compliance in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Preventive cardiology, 2005,Spring, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Assessment of vascular compliance may be a useful measurement of the clinical effects of antihypertensive treatment. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are known to improve vascular elasticity. A study was performed to test the hypothesis that combined therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker would have additive benefits on vascular compliance at similar levels of blood pressure (BP), as compared with monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor. This 12-week, double-blind study was a substudy of a larger clinical hypertension study conducted in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Subjects (N = 20) were randomized to either a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl or to enalapril monotherapy. BP, heart rate, large- and small-vessel compliance, systemic vascular resistance, and urinary microalbumin excretion were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Both treatments were similarly effective in lowering BP, reducing systemic vascular resistance, and decreasing urinary microalbumin excretion. Improvement in large-vessel compliance was significantly greater among subjects who received ACE-inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy (52%) as compared with those who received ACE-inhibitor monotherapy (32%; p < 0.05). No significant change in small-vessel compliance was observed with either treatment. Greater improvement in large-vessel compliance with combination therapy was independent of BP lowering.

    Topics: Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuresis; Vascular Resistance

2005
Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.
    Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2003, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Albuminuria and hypertension are predictors of poor renal and cardiovascular outcome in diabetic patients. This study tested whether dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with both an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I) and an Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to either drug alone in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). A randomized double-blind crossover trial was performed with 8-wk treatment with placebo, 20 mg of benazepril once daily, 80 mg of valsartan once daily, and the combination of 20 mg of benazepril and 80 mg of valsartan. Twenty type I diabetic patients with DN were included. At the end of each treatment period, albuminuria, 24-h BP, and GFR were measured. Eighteen patients completed the study. Placebo values were: albuminuria [mean (95% CI)], 701 (490 to 1002) mg/24 h; BP [mean (SEM)], 144 (4)/79 (2) mmHg, and GFR [mean (SEM)], 82 (7) ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Treatment with benazepril, valsartan, or dual blockade significantly reduced albuminuria and BP compared with placebo. Benazepril and valsartan were equally effective. Dual blockade induced an additional reduction in albuminuria of 43 % (29 to 54 %) compared with any type of monotherapy, and a reduction in systolic BP of 6 (0 to 13) mmHg and 7 (1 to 14) mmHg (versus benazepril and valsartan, respectively) and a reduction of 7 (4 to 10) mmHg diastolic compared with both monotherapies. GFR was reversibly reduced on dual blockade compared with monotherapy and placebo. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, dual blockade of the RAS may offer additional renal and cardiovascular protection in type I diabetic patients with DN.

    Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Nephropathies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan

2003
Impact of an ACE inhibitor and calcium antagonist on microalbuminuria and lipid subfractions in type 2 diabetes: a randomised, multi-centre pilot study.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2002, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Microalbuminuria (MA) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and lipid abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) reduce MA and are neutral on total cholesterol and triglycerides. The effect of ACE inhibitors and CCBs on lipid subfractions such as Lp(a), apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B, and others, however, is unclear. The current study tests the hypothesis that a fixed-dose combination of an ACE inhibitor, benazepril (B) with the dihydropyridine CCB, amlodipine (A), will further reduce arterial pressure and reduce atherogenic lipid fractions compared to either agent alone.. A multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group design was used to study 27 participants with type 2 diabetes. Measurements for total cholesterol, high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL), triglycerides, apo A1, apo B, Lp(a), MA, arterial pressure and creatinine clearance were obtained at baseline and at 12-week intervals during the 36 week study.. Arterial pressure was significantly reduced at 36 weeks in all three groups (P = 0.0078 for A, P = 0.0039 for B, and P = 0.0313 for A+B). MA was lowered in all groups with relatively greater reductions in the B (P < 0.05) and A+B groups (P < 0.03) vs A. An increase in mean HDL-cholesterol from baseline was noted in the B and A+B groups; P < 0.05), but not in the A group. A trend was also observed between the rise in HDL-cholesterol and the reduction in MA in the B and A+B groups. Additionally, only the B group exhibited a decrease in the median value of Lp(a) (P < 0.05).. These data support the concept that ACE inhibition with B reduces the atherogenic profile by decreasing Lp(a) and increasing HDL-cholesterol, the latter being correlated with reductions in MA. While A+B exhibited similar trends in lipid subfractions and MA as B, this group had the greatest reduction in systolic blood pressure of the three groups. Thus, use of A+B offers the benefits of a decreased atherogenic profile with a higher probably of achieving goal blood pressure as recommended by national guidelines.

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Apolipoproteins; Apoprotein(a); Benzazepines; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dihydropyridines; Female; Humans; Lipoprotein(a); Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Triglycerides

2002
Cilnidipine is as effective as benazepril for control of blood pressure and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2001, Volume: 24, Issue:4

    To investigate the beneficial effects of cilnidipine, a calcium channel blocker that shows high selectivity for N-type receptors, on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency, we compared the efficacy of cilnidipine to that of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with known renal protective effects, in a one-year trial evaluating hypertensive control, serum creatinine, and albuminuria in a cohort of patients. Given the seeming importance of the etiology of chronic renal insufficiency in determining drug efficacy, we limited our study to 20 patients with a single common condition, benign nephrosclerosis. The average age of the patients was 62+/-4 years old. The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year revealed a similar reduction with cilnidipine and benazepril. Both cilnidipine and benazepril induced similar reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year. The baseline levels of serum creatinine were 1.40+/-0.2 mg/dl and urinary excretion of albumin was 168+/-10 mg daily. The levels of serum creatinine were not significantly changed throughout the study in either group, although the levels of urinary excretion of albumin were significantly decreased in both groups. There were no significant differences in either of these values between the two groups. In conclusion, both cilnidipine and benazepril equally and effectively reduced blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis in a one-year trial.

    Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cohort Studies; Creatinine; Dihydropyridines; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrosclerosis; Proteinuria

2001
Effects of benazepril and nicardipine on microalbuminuria in normotensive and hypertensive patients with diabetes.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 1996, Volume: 60, Issue:4

    Diabetic nephropathy is the most frequent cause of chronic renal failure. The onset of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus, which seems to be related to blood pressure and the control of glycemia, is predictive of the development of true proteinuria. This multicenter, single-blind, randomized study examined the effects of benazepril and nicardipine on overnight microalbuminuria in 57 normotensive and 46 hypertensive diabetic patients. At the end of a 3-month placebo run-in period, the patients were stratified on the basis of the presence or absence of arterial hypertension and, within each stratum, randomized to receive one daily tablet of 10 mg benazepril or one tablet of 20 mg nicardipine twice daily for 6 months. Renal hemodynamics was investigated in 25 patients. Both drugs decreased overnight microalbuminuria throughout the study period, but benazepril was more effective than nicardipine (p = 0.025); in the patients with hypertension, both drugs led to a similar marked reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This study shows that benazepril was more effective than nicardipine in reducing overnight microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus, independently of their antihypertensive properties.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuminuria; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Nicardipine; Single-Blind Method

1996

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for benazepril and Albuminuria

ArticleYear
A multidrug, antiproteinuric approach to alport syndrome: a ten-year cohort study.
    Nephron, 2015, Volume: 130, Issue:1

    Combined ACE inhibitor, angiotensin-receptor-blocker, non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel-blocker, and statin therapy (Remission Clinic) reduced proteinuria and halted progression in non-diabetic nephropathies, but their efficacy in Alport syndrome (AS) nephropathy is unknown.. From February 2004 to September 2007, we included nine albuminuric AS adults with creatinine clearance >20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in a single-center, open-label, prospective, off-on-off academic study. After the 1-month wash-out from RAS inhibition (Run-in), patients entered the 4-month, add-on, treatment period with benazepril (10-20 mg/day), valsartan (80-160 mg/day), diltiazem (60-120 mg/day), and fluvastatin (40-80 mg/day) followed by the 1-month wash-out (Recovery). The primary outcome was albuminuria at month 4. After recovery, patients were kept on the Remission Clinic protocol and followed until July 2014 (Extension).. The median (IQR) albuminuria progressively declined from 657.7 (292.7-1,089.6) μg/min at baseline to 71.4 (21.7-504.9) μg/min at treatment end (p = 0.009) and raised to 404.3 (167.9-446.8) μg/min after recovery. Albumin and IgG fractional clearances significantly (p ≤ 0.005) decreased from 66.9 (53.6-80.8) to 9.4 (4.6-26.0) and from 5.1 (3.0-8.4) to 1.1 (0.6-3.2), and then recovered toward baseline. Blood pressure and lipids significantly decreased on treatment, without changes in inulin-measured GFR or para-aminohippuric-measured RPF. After recovery, one patient refused to enter the extension, one with severe renal insufficiency at baseline reached ESRD, and seven retained normal serum creatinine until the end of the study. At the final visit, three were microalbuminuric and one was normoalbuminuric. Treatment was well tolerated.. The Remission Clinic approach safely ameliorated albuminuria, blood pressure, lipids, and glomerular selectivity in AS patients and halted long-term progression in those without renal insufficiency to start with.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzazepines; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cohort Studies; Diltiazem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated; Female; Fluvastatin; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Indoles; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Nephritis, Hereditary; Prospective Studies; Proteinuria; Valsartan

2015
Combined therapy of rhein and benazepril on the treatment of diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2007, Volume: 115, Issue:9

    Rhein and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) have been reported to prevent the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN). We further explore the unknown ability to induce renal-protection of rhein and ACEI combined therapy in DN compared with the therapeutic effects of single treatment of them by using db/db mouse of type 2 diabetes model.. db/db and db/m mice, 8 weeks of age, were divided into five groups according to the following treatments: (A) db/m, given saline treatment; (B) db/db, given saline treatment; (C) db/db, given rhein treatment (150 mg/kg/day); (D) db/db, given benazepril treatment (10 mg/kg/day); (E) db/db, given rhein (150 mg/kg/day) with benazepril (10 mg/kg/day). Body weight, plasma glucose, plasma lipid and 24 h urinary albumin excretion levels were measured every 4 weeks. Morphometry of renal tissue and immunohistology of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta) and fibronectin were determined for all groups at the end of the treatment.. It was found that after treatment urinary albumin excretion was reduced after 4 weeks treatment in group E and after 8 weeks treatment in groups C and D, when compared to group B (p<0.05). Plasma creatinine levels dropped significantly for group E, compared with the diabetic control group by the end of the treatment period. Furthermore, after the treatment body weight, plasma glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride and low density lipoprotein all decreased in groups C and E compared to group B (p<0.05). Histological morphometric analysis revealed that the whole glomerular area and extracellular matrix area was significantly reduced in groups C, D and E compared to group B, at 20 weeks of age, an effect most pronounced in group E. Using immunohistochemistry, the expression of fibronectin and TGF-beta1 in groups C, D and E was found to have decreased compared to group B, after 12 weeks treatment, again the effect being more pronounced in group E.. There appeared to be a similar renal protective effect of rhein compared with benazepril in diabetic nephropathy. A combined therapy may offer a more beneficial complementary effect on kidney injury in db/db mice, as reflected by urinary albumin excretion, renal function and histological changes. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach that combines rhein with ACEI provides a more effective therapy for DN than does either agent alone.

    Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Anthraquinones; Benzazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fibronectins; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct; Immunohistochemistry; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Random Allocation; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Triglycerides

2007
Combined AGE inhibition and ACEi decreases the progression of established diabetic nephropathy in B6 db/db mice.
    Kidney international, 2006, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    The accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGE) is a key factor in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Pyridoxamine inhibits AGE formation and protects against type I DN. Herein we tested: (1) whether C57BL6 db/db mice as a model of established type II DN resembled patients treated with drugs which inhibit angiotensin II action; (2) whether pyridoxamine was effective as a single therapy; and (3) whether pyridoxamine would add to the benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi) by enalapril. In first set of experiments mice were treated with ACEi (benazepril) and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (valsartan) combination for 16 weeks after the onset of diabetes. In second group, mice with established DN were treated with pyridoxamine for 8 weeks. In a third set, mice with established DN were treated with pyridoxamine and enalapril combination for 16 weeks. Benazepril and valsartan combination partially prevented the development and progression of DN. Pyridoxamine treatment, as single therapy, decreased the progression of albuminuria and glomerular lesions. The combination of pyridoxamine with enalapril reduced both mortality and the progression of DN. In conclusion, (1) C57 BL6 db/db mice are a model of progressive type II DN; (2) The combination of pyridoxamine with enalapril decreased progression of type 2 DN and overall mortality. Thus, pyridoxamine could be a valuable adjunct to the current treatment of established type II DN.

    Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Collagen Type IV; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Female; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Obese; Pyridoxamine; Tetrazoles; Valine; Valsartan; Vitamin B Complex

2006
Renal functional reserve in patients with essential hypertension: effect of inhibition of the renin--angiotensin system.
    Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 1990, Volume: 78, Issue:6

    1. Urinary albumin excretion and the effect of an acute oral protein load (a meat meal) on glomerular filtration rate ('renal functional reserve') were evaluated in 15 essential hypertensive patients with preserved renal function and compared with 12 normal subjects. 2. Seven patients had microalbuminuria (greater than 30 mg/day) that was not correlated with blood pressure values. 3. After an oral protein load, an average increase of 20% in glomerular filtration rate (from 91 +/- 19 to 110 +/- 27 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 was found in the hypertensive patients. This change was not statistically different from that observed in normal controls (from 102 +/- 7 to 124 +/- 9 ml min-1 1.73 m-2). The glomerular response in hypertensive patients was independent of age, duration of hypertension, blood pressure, plasma renin activity, urinary albumin excretion and retinal vascular alterations. 4. All patients were re-evaluated after 6 weeks treatment with a new orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, benazepril. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were lowered in all the patients, but the drug did not affect the glomerular response to acute protein ingestion or the magnitude of urinary albumin excretion. 5. The findings of a normal 'renal functional reserve' and a lack of change in both urinary albumin excretion and the glomerular response after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition cast doubt on the existence of increased intraglomerular pressure in hypertensive patients.

    Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Renin-Angiotensin System

1990