bc-264 and Pain

bc-264 has been researched along with Pain* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for bc-264 and Pain

ArticleYear
Cholecystokinin-A but not cholecystokinin-B receptor stimulation induces endogenous opioid-dependent antinociceptive effects in the hot plate test in mice.
    Neuroscience letters, 1993, Oct-01, Volume: 160, Issue:2

    The effects of intracerebroventricular administration of the cholecystokinin (CCK) analogue, BDNL, and the selective CCK-B agonist, BC 264, were determined using the hot plate test in mice. BDNL (0.2 nmol and 0.5 nmol) increased the jump and the paw lick latencies. These effects were blocked by the CCK-A antagonist MK-329 (0.02 mg/kg), supporting the involvement of CCK-A receptors in CCK-induced analgesia. In contrast, the selective CCK-B agonist BC 264 produced, at one dose (2.5 nmol), a slight decrease in the lick latency that was only antagonized by the CCK-B antagonist. Naloxone, but not naltrindole, antagonized BDNL-induced analgesia. The results suggest that activation of CCK-A receptors by BDNL leads to antinociceptive responses indirectly mediated by stimulation of mu-opioid receptors by endogenous enkephalins.

    Topics: Animals; Benzodiazepinones; Cerebral Ventricles; Cholecystokinin; Devazepide; Hot Temperature; Injections, Intraventricular; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Naloxone; Pain; Peptide Fragments; Phenylurea Compounds; Receptors, Cholecystokinin; Sincalide

1993
Modulation of opioid antinociception by CCK at the supraspinal level: evidence of regulatory mechanisms between CCK and enkephalin systems in the control of pain.
    British journal of pharmacology, 1993, Volume: 109, Issue:4

    1. Much evidence in the literature supports the idea that cholecystokinin (CCK) interacts with opioids in pain mechanisms. In this work, we have investigated the supraspinal interactions between enkephalins and CCK, using the hot plate test in mice. 2. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of BDNL (a mixed CCKA/CCKB agonist) induced dose-dependent antinociceptive responses on both paw lick and jump responses. In contrast, using the same test, the i.c.v. injection of BC 264 (a selective CCKB agonist) induced a hyperalgesic effect, which was restricted to paw licking and occurred only at a high dose of 2.5 nmol. 3. In addition, i.c.v. administration of BDNL potentiated the antinociceptive effects of the mixed inhibitor of enkephalin degrading enzymes, RB 101 and of the mu-agonist, DAMGO, while BC 264 reduced these effects. 4. Furthermore, at a dose where it interacts selectively with delta-opioid receptors, the opioid agonist BUBU reversed the hyperalgesic responses of BC 264 (2.5 nmol) but was unable to modify the effects induced by BDNL. 5. Taken together, these results suggest the existence of regulatory mechanisms between CCK and enkephalin systems in the control of pain. These regulatory loops could enhance the antinociceptive effects of morphine allowing the opiate doses used to be reduced and thus, possibly, the side-effects to be minimized.

    Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Analgesics; Animals; Cholecystokinin; Disulfides; Endorphins; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Enkephalins; Injections, Intraventricular; Male; Mice; Molecular Sequence Data; Oligopeptides; Pain; Pain Measurement; Peptide Fragments; Phenylalanine; Sincalide; Spinal Cord

1993