bassianolide and Amebiasis

In this work, a survey of sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, for amoebae and scuticociliatidia infections was carried out to evaluate their effects on the aquaculture of this fish species. The study was conducted in two different fish farms, one using seawater and the other brackish water. Infection with parasitic amoebae was found to be fairly high (prevalence: 43-73%), being more frequent in sea bass from the brackish water system. Although it was never found to cause outbreaks of disease or mortality in the surveyed fish, amoebic gill disease (AGD) histopathological signs, i.e., hyperplasia, secondary lamellae fusion and cavity formation (interlamellar vesicles), were observed in fish manifesting no macroscopic lesions. Furthermore, some evidence was found that amoebae affects the fish's general state of health and growth rate. These results indicate that cautious and detailed surveys to detect this sort of infection, and thus carefully plan its control, are fully justified. Compared with amoebic infection, the prevalence of scuticociliatosis was found to be low (7-13%). No outbreaks of disease or mortality were ever recorded, even when scuticociliatidia was present in turbot raised in the same water system, leading to serious outbreaks of disease and mortalities in that species. This suggests that sea bass is far more resistant than turbot to such infections, and if this is the case, the former fish may be a good farming alternative when scuticociliatidia is present.

Topics: Amebiasis; Amoeba; Animals; Aquaculture; Bass; Fish Diseases; Gills; Portugal; Prevalence; Seawater; Statistics, Nonparametric; Virulence

Although amoebic gill disease (AGD) has emerged as one of the most severe health problems in the fish industry, proof of the identity of AGD agents from various localities is still missing. Six strains of amoebae designated until recently as Paramoeba species (the agents of AGD) were studied in cultures by light and electron microscopy. Although they were isolated from gills of different hosts (Dicentrarchus labrax and Scophthalmus maximus) and from distant localities, their morphology was identical. The strains differed from Paramoeba eilhardi, the type species of the genus, in that they lacked the boat-shaped microscales on the cell surface but could be safely identified as belonging to the genus Neoparamoeba Page, 1987. Transmission electron microscopy revealed the presence of a symbiotic organism, Perkinsiella amoebae Hollande, 1980, in all strains under study. The only difference among the strains examined was found in the size of trophozoites, which could be attributed to the different origins of the strains, but until more refined diagnostic methods are available, in addition to N. pemaquidensis, the closely related species N. aestuarina also has to be taken into consideration as the agent of AGD.

Topics: Amebiasis; Amoeba; Animals; Bass; Fish Diseases; Flatfishes; Gills; Histocytochemistry; Microscopy, Electron