aztreonam has been researched along with Bacterial Skin Diseases in 18 studies
Aztreonam: A monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic originally isolated from Chromobacterium violaceum. It is resistant to beta-lactamases and is used in gram-negative infections, especially of the meninges, bladder, and kidneys. It may cause a superinfection with gram-positive organisms.
aztreonam : A synthetic monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic (monobactam), used primarily to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. It inhibits mucopeptide synthesis in the bacterial cell wall, thereby blocking peptidoglycan crosslinking.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens." | 3.01 | Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET). ( Engelhardt, M; Gonzalez-Rojas, Y; Gumenchuk, I; Hamed, KA; Ionescu, D; Jones, ME; Keech, R; Kim, C; Ninov, B; Overcash, JS; Saulay, M; Simeonov, S; Smart, JI; Waters, M, 2021) |
" Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups was similar." | 2.87 | A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study. ( Cammarata, S; Cruz-Saldariagga, M; Lawrence, L; Liang, S; McManus, A; O'Riordan, W; Poromanski, I; Quintas, M; Teras, J, 2018) |
" Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events in the delafloxacin and vancomycin/aztreonam groups was similar." | 2.84 | Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study. ( Cammarata, S; Farley, B; Gardovskis, J; Lawrence, L; Ling, R; Pullman, J; Quintas, M; Sun, E, 2017) |
" Adverse events were reported in 46 (41." | 2.77 | A randomized, evaluator-blind, phase 2 study comparing the safety and efficacy of omadacycline to those of linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. ( Arbeit, RD; Draper, MP; Hait, H; Noel, GJ; Tanaka, SK, 2012) |
"Tigecycline monotherapy is a safe and effective therapy for cSSSIs in geographically distinct populations in Asia." | 2.76 | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin-aztreonam in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in patients from India and Taiwan. ( Aradhya, S; Chang, CM; Chuang, YC; Cooper, A; Dartois, N; Jouve, S; Nagari, B; Pai, V, 2011) |
" Increasing antimicrobial resistance in cSSSI has led to a need for new safe and effective therapies." | 2.75 | Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. ( Baculik, T; Corey, GR; Critchley, I; Das, AF; Friedland, HD; Talbot, GH; Thye, D; Wilcox, M; Witherell, GW, 2010) |
" Equally important is the need to provide therapy that is safe and well tolerated." | 2.75 | Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: Phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. ( Corrado, ML, 2010) |
" Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results and adverse event reporting." | 2.73 | Overview of tigecycline efficacy and safety in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections - a European perspective. ( Cooper, A; Dartois, N; Dukart, G; Gardovskis, J; Jouve, S; Kupcs, U; Pupelis, G; Teras, J; Vaasna, T, 2008) |
" Adverse events were similar, with increased nausea and vomiting in the tigecycline group and increased rash and elevated hepatic aminotransferase levels in the vancomycin-aztreonam group." | 2.71 | The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam. ( Babinchak, T; Dartois, N; Ellis-Grosse, EJ; Loh, E; Rose, G, 2005) |
" Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory analyses, and adverse event reporting." | 2.71 | Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial. ( Campos, ME; Curcio, D; Ellis-Grosse, E; Embil, JM; Loh, E; Penn, RL; Rose, G; Sacchidanand, S, 2005) |
" Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results, and adverse event reporting." | 2.71 | Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam. ( Breedt, J; Dartois, N; Ellis-Grosse, EJ; Gardovskis, J; Gioud-Paquet, M; Loh, E; Maritz, FJ; Ross, DP; Teras, J; Vaasna, T, 2005) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 4 (22.22) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 13 (72.22) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (5.56) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Overcash, JS | 1 |
Kim, C | 1 |
Keech, R | 1 |
Gumenchuk, I | 1 |
Ninov, B | 1 |
Gonzalez-Rojas, Y | 1 |
Waters, M | 1 |
Simeonov, S | 1 |
Engelhardt, M | 1 |
Saulay, M | 1 |
Ionescu, D | 1 |
Smart, JI | 1 |
Jones, ME | 1 |
Hamed, KA | 1 |
Pullman, J | 1 |
Gardovskis, J | 3 |
Farley, B | 1 |
Sun, E | 1 |
Quintas, M | 2 |
Lawrence, L | 2 |
Ling, R | 1 |
Cammarata, S | 2 |
O'Riordan, W | 1 |
McManus, A | 1 |
Teras, J | 3 |
Poromanski, I | 1 |
Cruz-Saldariagga, M | 1 |
Liang, S | 1 |
Huang, X | 1 |
Beresford, E | 1 |
Lodise, T | 1 |
Friedland, HD | 3 |
Eckmann, C | 1 |
Dryden, M | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Wilson, D | 1 |
Iaconis, JP | 1 |
Gonzalez, J | 1 |
Vaasna, T | 2 |
Kupcs, U | 1 |
Pupelis, G | 1 |
Dukart, G | 1 |
Dartois, N | 4 |
Jouve, S | 2 |
Cooper, A | 2 |
Corey, GR | 3 |
Wilcox, M | 1 |
Talbot, GH | 3 |
Baculik, T | 3 |
Witherell, GW | 2 |
Critchley, I | 1 |
Das, AF | 1 |
Thye, D | 4 |
Wilcox, MH | 2 |
Friedland, D | 2 |
Corrado, ML | 1 |
Chuang, YC | 1 |
Chang, CM | 1 |
Aradhya, S | 1 |
Nagari, B | 1 |
Pai, V | 1 |
Drusano, GL | 1 |
O'Neal, T | 1 |
Biek, D | 1 |
Eckburg, PB | 1 |
Rank, DR | 1 |
Llorens, L | 1 |
Smith, A | 1 |
Laudano, JB | 1 |
Noel, GJ | 1 |
Draper, MP | 1 |
Hait, H | 1 |
Tanaka, SK | 1 |
Arbeit, RD | 1 |
Ellis-Grosse, EJ | 2 |
Babinchak, T | 1 |
Rose, G | 2 |
Loh, E | 3 |
Sacchidanand, S | 1 |
Penn, RL | 1 |
Embil, JM | 1 |
Campos, ME | 1 |
Curcio, D | 1 |
Ellis-Grosse, E | 1 |
Breedt, J | 1 |
Maritz, FJ | 1 |
Ross, DP | 1 |
Gioud-Paquet, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Establish the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftobiprole Medocaril Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections[NCT03137173] | Phase 3 | 679 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-02-19 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections[NCT01811732] | Phase 3 | 660 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)[NCT01984684] | Phase 3 | 850 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Fosamil (600 mg Every 8 Hours) vs Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Patients With Complicated Bacterial Skin and Soft Tissu[NCT02202135] | Phase 3 | 4 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-06-30 | Terminated (stopped due to "Overall study status is changed to Terminated due to low enrollment") | ||
A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Fosamil (600 mg Every 8 Hours) Versus Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Patients With Complicated Bacterial Skin and Soft T[NCT01499277] | Phase 3 | 802 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline With Those of Vancomycin With Aztreonam to Treat Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Hospitalized Patients.[NCT00228410] | Phase 3 | 503 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-11-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infection (cSSSI)[NCT00423657] | Phase 3 | 680 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-03-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infection[NCT00424190] | Phase 3 | 698 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-02-28 | Completed | ||
Observational Prospective Multidirectional Study on the Safety of Antimicrobial Pharmacotherapy in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Children Aged 0-17[NCT04141657] | 100 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2020-02-01 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Comparison of early clinical response, including ≥ 20% reduction from baseline in the primary lesion area (based on ruler measurements), survival for ≥ 72 hours and no rescue therapy in the ITT population (NCT03137173)
Timeframe: 48-72 hours after start of study drug treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Ceftobiprole Medocaril | 306 |
Vancomycin+Aztreonam | 303 |
Comparison of investigator-assessed clinical success (based on resolution of baseline signs and symptoms of the primary infection) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population (NCT03137173)
Timeframe: 15-22 days after randomization
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Ceftobiprole Medocaril | 277 |
Vancomycin+Aztreonam | 279 |
Comparison of investigator-assessed clinical success (based on resolution of baseline signs and symptoms of the primary infection) in the ITT population (NCT03137173)
Timeframe: 15-22 days after randomization
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Ceftobiprole Medocaril | 302 |
Vancomycin+Aztreonam | 306 |
"A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis.~A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing)." (NCT01811732)
Timeframe: Study Day 14 +/- 1 day
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cure | Improved | Failure | Indeterminate | |
Delafloxacin Plus Placebo | 172 | 98 | 9 | 52 |
Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam + Placebo | 166 | 108 | 7 | 48 |
A patient was considered a responder if s/he had a ≥20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI, as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge and had none of the reasons for clinical failure; a patient was considered a non-responder (failure) if s/he had <20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge, or had major intervention such as another antibiotic or surgical intervention or died within 74 hours after initiation of study drug. (NCT01811732)
Timeframe: 48 to 72 hours after starting treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Responder | Non-Responder | |
Delafloxacin Plus Placebo | 259 | 72 |
Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam + Placebo | 266 | 63 |
Clinical cure is defined as resolution or improvement of signs and symptoms compared to baseline and no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary. Clinical failure is defined as any of the following: persistence or worsening in signs or symptoms, or requirement for concomitant antibiotic therapy, or requirement of an unplanned surgical intervention >48 hours after the first dose, or death caused by skin infection, or an AE leading to study drug discontinuation with alternative antimicrobial therapy required, or diagnosis of osteomyelitis >=8 days after the first dose. (NCT02202135)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participant (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Clinical cure | Clinical failure | Indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline | 3 | 0 | 1 |
The observed difference in the clinical relapse rates at LFU (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in CE. Clinical relapse rate at LFU is measured by comparing a patient's signs and symptoms at late follow-up to those when they were cured at TOC. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 21 to 42 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Relapse | No relapse | Indeterminate | Missing | |
Ceftaroline | 3 | 335 | 3 | 1 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 3 | 174 | 3 | 0 |
The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at EOT (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in MITT. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at EOT visit to those recorded at study baseline. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: On day of last dose of study drug (or + 1 day)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical cure | Clinical failure | Indeterminate | Missing | |
Ceftaroline | 429 | 44 | 31 | 2 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 213 | 29 | 11 | 2 |
The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at EOT (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in CE. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at EOT visit to those recorded at study baseline. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: On day of last dose of study drug (or +1 day)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Clinical cure | Clinical failure | |
Ceftaroline | 356 | 39 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 184 | 27 |
The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at TOC (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in MITT. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at TOC visit to those recorded at study baseline. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participant (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Clinical cure | Clinical failure | indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline | 396 | 58 | 52 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 202 | 34 | 19 |
The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at TOC (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in CE. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at TOC visit to those recorded at study baseline. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participant (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Clinical cure | Clinical failure | |
Ceftaroline | 342 | 53 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 180 | 31 |
The observed difference in the early success rates at 48 to 72 hours of treatment (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in MITT. Early response rate as measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at the 48-72 hour visit to those recorded at study baseline. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 48 to 72 hours after first dose of study drug
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
success | failure | Indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline | 445 | 28 | 33 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 229 | 11 | 15 |
Difference in microbiological favorable response rate at TOC in mMITT analysis set. Favorable microbiological response rate is measured by comparing TOC microbiological data to baseline microbiological data. In the absence of TOC microbiological data it is presumed from the clinical response. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participant (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Favorable | Unfavorable | Indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline | 203 | 17 | 28 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 109 | 17 | 10 |
Per-pathogen microbiological response at TOC by baseline pathogen from site of skin infection in ME analysis set (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSA - Favorable; (n=94, 57) | MSSA - Unfavorable; (n=94, 57) | MRSA - Favorable; (n=25, 15) | MRSA - Unfavorable; (n=25, 15) | Streptococcus pyogenes - Favorable; (n=15, 7) | Streptococcus pyogenes - Unfavorable; (n=15, 7) | Streptococcus agalactiae - Favorable; (n=6, 9) | Streptococcus agalactiae - Unfavorable; (n=6, 9) | Streptococcus dysgalactiae - Favorable; (n=9, 0) | Streptococcus dysgalactiae - Unfavorable; (n=9, 0) | Enterococcus faecalis - Favorable; (n=6, 5) | Enterococcus faecalis - Unfavorable; (n=6, 5) | Escherichia coli - Favorable; (n=12, 10) | Escherichia coli - Unfavorable; (n=12, 10) | Klebsiella pneumoniae - Favorable; (n=7, 4) | Klebsiella pneumoniae - Unfavorable; (n=7, 4) | Klebsiella oxytoca - Favorable; (n=4, 1) | Klebsiella oxytoca - Unfavorable; (n=4, 1) | Proteus mirabilis - Favorable; (n=7, 2) | Proteus mirabilis - Unfavorable; (n=7, 2) | Morganella morganii - Favorable; (n=4, 2) | Morganella morganii - Unfavorable; (n=4, 2) | Enterobacter cloacae - Favorable; (n=4, 5) | Enterobacter cloacae - Unfavorable; (n=4, 5) | |
Ceftaroline | 91 | 3 | 22 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 49 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Difference in microbiological favorable response rate at TOC in ME. Favourable microbiological response rate is measured by comparing TOC microbiological data to baseline microbiological data. In the absence of TOC microbiological data it is presumed from the clinical response. (NCT01499277)
Timeframe: 7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug
Intervention | Participant (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Favourable | Unfavorable | |
Ceftaroline | 167 | 14 |
Vancomycin/Aztreonam | 98 | 14 |
"Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.~Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI.~Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome" (NCT00423657)
Timeframe: 8-15 days after last dose of study drug administration
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Clinical Cure | Clinical Failure | Indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline for Injection | 291 | 25 | 26 |
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam | 289 | 28 | 21 |
"Cure: Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.~Failure: Requirement of alternative antimicrobial therapy for primary infection of cSSSI due to inadequate response, recurrence, new infection at the same site; treatment-limiting adverse event (AE); requirement for surgery due to failure of study drug; diagnosis of osteomyelitis after Study Day 8; or death caused by cSSSI.~Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome" (NCT00424190)
Timeframe: 8-15 days after the end of treatment
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Clinical Cure | Clinical Failure | Indeterminate | |
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Injection | 304 | 29 | 18 |
IV Vancomycin Plus IV Aztreonam | 297 | 21 | 29 |
15 trials available for aztreonam and Bacterial Skin Diseases
3 other studies available for aztreonam and Bacterial Skin Diseases
Article | Year |
---|---|
Ceftaroline fosamil use in hospitalized patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: Budget impact analysis from a hospital perspective.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Costs and Cost | 2013 |
[Efficacy of ceftaroline in treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections].
Topics: Aztreonam; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Randomized Controlled Tri | 2014 |
Early endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.
Topics: Aztreonam; Biomarkers; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Male; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; | 2012 |