azlocillin has been researched along with Gram-Negative-Bacterial-Infections* in 3 studies
2 trial(s) available for azlocillin and Gram-Negative-Bacterial-Infections
Article | Year |
---|---|
A randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus netilmicin plus azlocillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients.
Topics: Azlocillin; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies | 1991 |
Clinical efficacy and in vitro activity of the ciprofloxacin-azlocillin combination (ratio 1:10) against gram-negative bacteria from non-neutropenic haematologic patients.
The authors report treatment of eighteen haematologic patients (twelve male, six female, age between 21 and 78 years), suffering from upper respiratory tract (ten patients) and/or lower urinary tract (eight patients) infections caused by Gram-negative germs, with a combination of ciprofloxacin-azlocillin in the ratio 1:10. Before treatment, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) and Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) index of Gram-negative isolates from patients for the ciprofloxacin-azlocillin combination were evaluated. The in vitro experiments revealed a synergistic activity of the combination for 85% of isolates, while at the same concentration ciprofloxacin alone was 100% effective, and azlocillin alone was 50% effective. The combination was administered to patients as follows: ciprofloxacin: 750 mg "per os" every 12 h; azlocillin 5 g intravenously every 8 h for a therapeutic cycle of 8 days. Seventeen of the eighteen patients that were treated with the combination showed complete eradication of the causative pathogen, sixteen of the eighteen patients recovered fully, whereas the other two showed significant improvements. The tolerability of the combination was excellent in seventeen patients and only one patient developed symptoms of mild gastric intolerance. The results presented here warrant further interest in studies of this antibiotic combination. Topics: Adult; Aged; Azlocillin; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Prospective Studies | 1991 |
1 other study(ies) available for azlocillin and Gram-Negative-Bacterial-Infections
Article | Year |
---|---|
In vitro evaluation of newer beta-lactam antibiotics against gram negative bacilli isolated from neutropenic patients.
The in-vitro susceptibility pattern to newer beta lactams namely Ticer/Clav, Azlocillin, Piperacillin and Imipenem was determined with 50 clinical strains isolated from neutropenic patients with strains isolated from neutropenic patients with sepsis, with an objective of evolving a strategy for empirical antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenic patients. The MIC90 value for Imipenem for the Gram negative bacilli tested, other than Pseudomonas was < 0.25 mcg/ml therapy revealing a high degree of susceptibility, while for Ps. aeruginosa and related species MIC50 and MIV90 values were 2.0 and 64.0 micrograms/ml respectively. A comparatively lower degree of susceptibility was found among Gram negative bacilli included in the study to ticar/clavu, azlocillin and piperacillin indicating a moderate degree of resistance to these antibiotics. The data from this study suggests that (i) Ureidopenicillins with an aminoglycoside should be effective therapy for proven Pseudomonas and other Gram negative sepsis in febrile neutropenic patients. (ii) Imipenem would be the antibiotic of choice in Gram negative bacterial sepsis in febrile neutropenic patients where the organism is resistant to cephalosporins and ureidopenicillins. Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azlocillin; Clavulanic Acid; Clavulanic Acids; Drug Evaluation; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Imipenem; Neutropenia; Piperacillin; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sepsis; Ticarcillin | 1994 |