azlocillin and Fever

A prospective, randomized trial comparing monotherapy with high-dose ciprofloxacin versus a standard combination regimen of azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients was performed. One hundred and forty-six patient episodes were randomized, but ten (seven ciprofloxacin and three azlocillin/netilmicin) were considered unevaluable for efficacy, and three episodes were withdrawn due to incorrect randomization or non-neutropenia. Of the remaining 133 episodes, infections resolved without modification of therapy in 25/66 (38%) versus 28/67 (42%) of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated groups respectively (P = 0.72). Considering all randomized episodes, therapy was modified in 46/73 (63%) episodes with ciprofloxacin and 39/70 (56%) with azlocillin/netilmicin (P = 0.40). Of 73 patient episodes randomized to ciprofloxacin, 25 (34%) received oral follow-on therapy after a median of three days of intravenous therapy. Infections were microbiologically documented in 31/73 (42%) ciprofloxacin and 32/70 (46%) azlocillin/netilmicin, of which 8/27 (30%) and 14/31 (45%) of evaluable episodes resolved without modification of therapy respectively (P = 0.28). Gram-positive organisms accounted for 78% of all organisms cultured with 36% coagulase-negative staphylococci. Bacteriological eradication was recorded in 18/24 (75%) and 26/29 (90%) evaluable patient episodes treated with ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin respectively (P = 0.27). Superinfections were seen in 14% of episodes in both groups, and subsequent infections in 12% ciprofloxacin and 14% azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients. Two patients (one ciprofloxacin and one azlocillin/netilmicin) died within 48 h of randomization, and a further 13 patients (four ciprofloxacin and nine azlocillin/netilmicin) died before resolution of neutropenia. Adverse events were recorded in 9% and 15% of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients respectively, with skin rash (five ciprofloxacin and four azlocillin/netilmicin), nephrotoxicity (two azlocillin/netilmicin), abnormal liver function tests (two azlocillin/netilmicin), ototoxicity (one azlocillin/netilmicin) and nausea (one ciprofloxacin) being the major events recorded. It was concluded that monotherapy with ciprofloxacin at this dosage is a safe alternative to combination therapy with azlocillin/netilmicin, and has the advantages of twice daily administration, iv and oral presentations, no

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Azlocillin; Ciprofloxacin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Neutropenia

Topics: Azlocillin; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies

Efficacy of the cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was compared with that of the combination of the aminoglycoside, netilmicin, and the penicillin, azlocillin, in the treatment of febrile episodes in immunocompromised neutropenic children undergoing chemotherapy for neoplastic disease. During 100 separate febrile episodes, 40 strains of bacteria were isolated from the blood of 34 patients and a further 55 strains from other sites. Nine strains (four of which were staphylococci) to both netilmicin and azlocillin. There was no difference in clinical response between the two therapeutic regimens as assessed 4 and 7 days after treatment began. Ceftriaxone had the considerable practical advantages of once daily dosage without a need for blood monitoring. Ceftriaxone would appear to be effective as initial monotherapy in the treatment of bacterial infections in severely neutropenic children.

Topics: Adolescent; Agranulocytosis; Azlocillin; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Ceftriaxone; Child; Child, Preschool; Fever; Humans; Infant; Neoplasms; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

In a randomized multicentre study ciprofloxacin combined with azlocillin was compared with gentamicin and azlocillin for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. In 147 evaluable episodes in 108 patients, 80 patients received ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and 67 received gentamicin/azlocillin. The two treatment groups were comparable in terms of age, underlying diagnosis, and duration of neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 34 (42.5%) and 29 (43.3%) episodes in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and gentamicin/azlocillin groups respectively. At the end of therapy, 46 patients (57.5%) receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin showed complete resolution compared with 30 (44.7%) for the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.14). The clinical response rate for microbiologically documented episodes was 58.8% and 48.3% respectively (P = 0.45). Among the microbiologically documented infections with follow-up cultures available, 24 (92.3%) of 26 isolates from patients receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin were eradicated, in comparison with 19 (86.4%) of 22 in the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.65). There were five superinfections, all in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Significant resistance to the study drugs was not seen. Of all evaluable patients, including those subsequently withdrawn because of early modification of therapy, there were 12 deaths within the study period; six (6.8%) of these occurred in 88 patients randomized to the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group, compared with two of 80 (2.5%) in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated; one patient in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group developed convulsions, probably related to ciprofloxacin. The combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is as effective as gentamicin plus azlocillin and offers a useful alternative for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Gentamicins; Humans; Neutropenia; Remission Induction; Superinfection

In a randomized trial ceftazidime plus piperacillin or azlocillin, and netilmicin plus piperacillin or azlocillin were used as initial empirical therapy in 202 febrile neutropenic episodes. Netilmicin plus azlocillin was the most effective combination with a clinical response rate of 81% in clinically and microbiologically documented infections compared with 63% for ceftazidime plus piperacillin. All of the episodes of Gram-negative bacteraemia treated with azlocillin responded compared with 43% of those treated with piperacillin. Gram-positive organisms accounted for 52% of all bacteriologically documented infections and 40% of the febrile episodes were treated with vancomycin for presumptive or documented Gram-positive infection. Patients treated with netilmicin had significantly more nephrotoxicity than those given the double beta-lactam combinations (14.8% vs 3.5%; P less than 0.05). However, this difference was not shown in those patients who did not receive concurrent vancomycin or amphotericin. The double beta-lactam combinations were associated with more hypokalaemia (58.2% vs. 37.7%; P less than 0.05) and more colonization with yeasts (24% vs. 10.4%; P less than 0.05) but there was no evidence that their use was associated with prolongation of neutropenia. These results indicate that ceftazidime plus a ureidopenicillin would be adequate empirical therapy in situations where the concomitant use of nephrotoxic agents precludes the use of aminoglycoside containing combinations.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Penicillin G; Piperacillin; Random Allocation

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, the efficacy of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin was compared with that of a standard regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the initial empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. In addition, the efficacy of early conversion from intravenous therapy to orally administered ciprofloxacin was compared with that of continued ceftazidime plus amikacin. Seventy-one oncology patients with 79 episodes of fever and neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive initial empiric antibiotic therapy with either intravenously administered ciprofloxacin and azlocillin followed by orally administered ciprofloxacin (regimen 1, 25 episodes); ceftazidime and amikacin (regimen 2, 30 episodes); or ceftazidime and amikacin followed by oral ciprofloxacin (regimen 3, 24 episodes). Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 10 (40 percent), seven (23 percent), and nine (38 percent) episodes in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, including six, five, and four episodes of bacteremia. Patient survival was 90 to 92 percent in each regimen; however, some modification of antimicrobial therapy occurred in 65, 44, and 41 percent of surviving patients in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The rate of clearance of initial bacteremia was 67 percent (four of six) in regimen 1, 100 percent (five of five) in regimen 2 and 50 percent (two of four) in regimen 3. Patients in regimens 1 and 3 were able to convert to orally administered ciprofloxacin in 32 (65 percent) of 49 episodes after a mean of six days of intravenous therapy. Superinfections occurred in 24, 10, and 12 percent of patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and occurred similarly for patients receiving orally administered ciprofloxacin, 12 percent (four of 32), and intravenous therapy, 17 percent (eight of 47). Parenteral ciprofloxacin was generally well tolerated. One (4 percent) of 25 patients receiving regimen 1 experienced oto- or nephrotoxicity, compared with eight (15 percent) of 54 patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.15), including three patients who required premature termination of aminoglycoside therapy. Our data suggest that the combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is an effective alternative to ceftazidime and amikacin for the initial empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, is generally well tolerated, and avoids the oto- and nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycoside use. In addition, a majo

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agranulocytosis; Amikacin; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neutropenia; Random Allocation

One hundred and two patients with neutropenia (less than 1 x 10(9)/L) secondary to primary hematological disorders or chemotherapy for hematological malignancies were prospectively randomised, upon the development of fever or other signs of infection, to receive empirical antibiotic treatment with either ceftazidime (+/- flucloxacillin) (n = 52) or azlocillin plus amikacin (+/- flucloxacillin) (A&A, n = 50). The two groups were equivalent with respect to clinical and laboratory parameters prior to antibiotic therapy and flucloxacillin was added to approximately 25% of the patients in each group on the clinical suspicion of Gram positive infection. When assessed at 96 hours, the complete response rates were 59.6% for the ceftazidime treated patients and 44% for A&A treated patients. Partial response rates were 17% and 20% respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. Eight patients died whilst on the trial, three of those initially randomised to ceftazidime and five initially randomised to A&A. Moderate to severe hypokalemia was encountered significantly less often in the ceftazidime treated group (p less than 0.01), whilst other parameters of toxicity were equivalent. No primary or acquired resistance to ceftazidime was encountered. Separate analysis of those patients who did not receive flucloxacillin yielded identical results. We conclude that ceftazidime (+/- flucloxacillin) is as efficacious as azlocillin plus amikacin (+/- flucloxacillin) in the empirical antibiotic management of such patients and is associated with a lower incidence of moderate to severe hypokalemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agranulocytosis; Amikacin; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Floxacillin; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Therapeutic Equivalency

Topics: Agranulocytosis; Azlocillin; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Penicillins; Pseudomonas Infections; Staphylococcal Infections; Ticarcillin

The standard regimen used by members of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic cancer patients has been treatment with ticarcillin plus amikacin. A three-arm prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to determine whether the extended-spectrum antipseudomonal penicillin azlocillin or the extended-spectrum cephalosporin cefotaxime had more or less efficacy than the beta-lactam in the ticarcillin-plus-amikacin regimen. A total of 742 patients from 22 institutions were evaluated. Single gram-negative rod bacteremias accounted for 83 episodes, and it was among these patients that the prognosis was least satisfactory, leading to a more intensive evaluation of this patient group. In these patients the azlocillin-plus-amikacin regimen resulted in a 66% response rate, compared with a 37% response rate for patients who received cefotaxime plus amikacin (P = 0.080) and a 47% response rate for patients who received ticarcillin plus amikacin (P = 0.207). The patients with gram-negative rod bacteremias and persistently profound granulocytopenia had substantially poorer response rates (37%) than the patients with rising granulocyte counts (73%; P = 0.004). A logistic regression analysis indicated that the following factors also affected infection resolution: beta-lactam utilization in the regimen (azlocillin was better than ticarcillin or cefotaxime), resolution of profound granulocytopenia (less than 100 cells per microliter) during therapy, and susceptibility to the beta-lactam antibiotic.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Agranulocytosis; Amikacin; Azlocillin; Cefotaxime; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Kanamycin; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillins; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Regression Analysis; Sepsis; Ticarcillin

Fifty consecutive episodes of fever in neutropenic children with malignant disease or aplastic anaemia were randomized to treatment with either ceftazidime alone or a combination of azlocillin and tobramycin, pending the results of bacteriological investigation. More than 90% of organisms isolated from these episodes were sensitive to ceftazidime, which appears to be a non-toxic alternative to aminoglycosides in such circumstances.

Topics: Adolescent; Agranulocytosis; Anemia, Aplastic; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Humans; Infant; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Penicillins; Random Allocation; Tobramycin

Although the semisynthetic broad-spectrum acylureido-penicillin, azlocillin has been demonstrated to have significant antibiotic activity in leukemic patients, its role in combination therapy of febrile granulocytopenic patients with chemotherapy-treated solid tumors has not been clearly delineated. Thirty-five solid tumor patients with chemotherapy-induced absolute granulocytopenia (less than 1000 granulocytes/ml) associated with fever (greater than 38.3 degrees C) were treated on a prospective study with a combination of azlocillin 4 g intravenously (IV) every 6 hours, cephalothin 2 g IV every 6 hours, and tobramycin 80 to 100 mg IV every 8 to 12 hours. Prior chemotherapy included doxorubicin combinations in 18 patients and other combinations in 17 patients. Granulocyte counts preantibiotic therapy were greater than 100 granulocyte/ml in 14 patients, 100 to 499 in nine patients, and 500 to 1000 in 12 patients. Granulocyte nadirs were less than 100 in 20 patients, 100 to 499 in nine patients, and 500 to 1000 in six patients. Times for granulocytes to rise towards normal were 1 to 3 days in eight patients, 4 to 6 days in 18 patients, and 7 or more days in nine patients. Tobramycin levels were primarily in the peak range of 3 to 6 micrograms/ml and trough range of 0 to 1.9 micrograms/ml. The site and pathogen were identified in nine patients, the infection site clinically documented without isolated pathogen in three patients, and no site or pathogen identified in 23 patients. Of the 35 patients, 34 had good responses to the antibiotic combination (complete disappearance of fever and other evidence of infection). Serum creatinine rose 0.4 to 0.6 mg/dl in nine patients, 0.7 to 1.5 in four patients, and 1.5 in one patient (obstructive uropathy). The only other noted antibiotic-related side effect was hypokalemia. This antibiotic combination had little toxicity with marked efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azlocillin; Bacterial Infections; Cephalothin; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukopenia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Tobramycin

Nine adult patients with cystic fibrosis, nearly a quarter of the 38 patients with this disease who were treated with piperacillin (59 courses in all) during 1981-3 at the Brompton Hospital, developed a swinging pyrexia after a mean of 13.5 days' treatment with this antibiotic. The fever resolved shortly after the piperacillin treatment was stopped, as did the widespread rashes in the two patients who developed them. Three of four patients who had probable reactions to azlocillin may have been sensitised by piperacillin. As piperacillin does not appear to be any more effective than other antipseudomonal penicillins in cystic fibrosis, it is no longer used at the hospital for treating bronchopulmonary exacerbations in such patients.

Topics: Adult; Azlocillin; Carbenicillin; Cystic Fibrosis; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Piperacillin; Pseudomonas Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections

631 patients treated with azlocillin were evaluated for adverse reactions. Azlocillin doses ranged from 37-714 mg/kg/day (mean 260 mg/kg/day) and duration of treatment ranged from 1 to 276 days (mean 11.1 days). 82% of patients were treated for more than 7 days. 92 (14.6%) experienced systemic and 20 patients (3.2%) experienced local adverse reactions. Hypersensitivity, manifest by drug fever, cutaneous reactions, or eosinophilia occurred in 0.3, 1.8 and 1.1%, respectively. Hypokalemia developed in 0.5% overall and was dose and duration related. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 1.7%, diarrhea in 1.9% and leukopenia in 0.3%. Nephrotoxicity, expressed as elevated serum creatinine, was seen in 0.5%. Bleeding was seen in one group of patients that received cefamandole concomitantly. As these complications were not seen in other patients, these complications are probably due to cefamandole. In comparison with ticarcillin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, and mezlocillin, a similar number and severity of adverse reactions were seen. Although the incidence of certain adverse reactions may be underestimated due to the short duration of therapy, azlocillin appears to be exceptionally safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Azlocillin; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Drug Tolerance; Eosinophilia; Female; Fever; Humans; Hypokalemia; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillins; Thrombophlebitis