azilsartan and Hypertrophy--Left-Ventricular

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been widely used to treat hypertension and large-scale clinical studies have shown various benefits. In this study, we compared olmesartan with azilsartan, the newest ARB.. The subjects were outpatients who were clinically stable after cardiac surgery. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either azilsartan or olmesartan for 1 year and were switched to the other drug for the following 1 year. The primary endpoints were the levels of plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone.. Home blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and additional antihypertensive medication was administered to 12 patients (20 episodes) in the azilsartan group versus 4 patients (4 episodes) in the olmesartan group, with the number being significantly higher in the azilsartan group. After 1 year of treatment, both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Left ventricular mass index was also significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group.. This study showed that olmesartan reduces angiotensin II and aldosterone levels more effectively than azilsartan. Accordingly, it may be effective in patients with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity after cardiac surgery or patients with severe cardiac hypertrophy.

Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Substitution; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Imidazoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Remodeling

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and most patients with hypertension are administered antihypertensive drugs. However, not all patients achieve normal blood pressure levels. The new angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Osaka, Japan) has been reported to have a strong hypotensive effect. Our study investigated the efficacy of azilsartan compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers. This study included 17 hypertensive patients on HD, who had been administered angiotensin receptor blockers, except for azilsartan, for more than 6 months before enrolling, and after enrollment, they were switched to azilsartan. Blood tests, Holter electrocardiogram, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and echocardiography were performed at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. The blood pressure from baseline to 6 months had significantly decreased (24-h systolic blood pressure from 150.9 ± 16.2 mm Hg to 131.3 ± 21.7 mm Hg, P = 0.008), awakening time systolic blood pressure from 152.1 ± 16.9 mm Hg to 131.7 ± 23.2 mm Hg, P = 0.01, sleep-time systolic blood pressure from 148.1 ± 19.7 mm Hg to 130.0 ± 20.1 mm Hg, P = 0.005). There was a significant reduction in serum noradrenaline levels as well as left ventricular mass index after switching to azilsartan (from 550.1 ± 282.9 pg/mL, to 351.7 ± 152.3 pg/mL, P = 0.002; from 117.0 ± 26.4 g/m(2) to 111.3 ± 23.9 g/m(2), P = 0.01, respectively). Azilsartan had a significantly stronger hypotensive effect than other angiotensin receptor blockers. Thus, the switch to azilsartan might improve prognosis of hemodialysis patients. We suggest that the strong anti-hypertensive effect of azilsartan originated from a combination of primary angiotensin receptor blocker class-effect and a stronger suppression of sympathetic nervous system.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Male; Middle Aged; Norepinephrine; Oxadiazoles; Renal Dialysis; Sympathetic Nervous System