azilsartan and Hypertension

Arterial hypertension is a disease that still affects a major part of the population worldwide, and leads to fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions. From the CDC statistical analysis, as regarding to United States, 1 of every 3 adults has high blood pressure, and οnly about half (54%) of them have it under control. Furthermore, all that leads to a nation cost about $46 billion each year. Efforts to find new ways to regulate arterial hypertension are therefore imperative. In our days, a lot of references have been made to the use of a new therapeutic combination, that of azilsartan - an innovative ARB, in combination with chlorthalidone. Ιn fact, it is a combination now prescribed in a number of countries. A significant number of trials shows both azilsartan vs popular antihypertensive drugs, as well as chlorthalidone vs chlorothiazide, to present a better antihypertensive effect. This effect is even greater when the two substances are combined. In this article, we will try to present the latest findings concerning the efficacy, safety and clinical utility of this combination, as well as its adverse events, in comparison with other widely used therapeutic options.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Arterial Pressure; Benzimidazoles; Chlorthalidone; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Treatment Outcome

We have reviewed the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) in various animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, cardiac function, hypertrophy and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and renal function and morphology. Those of azilsartan and telmisartan have been included comprehensively whereas those of other ARBs have been included systematically but without intention of completeness. ARBs as a class lower blood pressure in established hypertension and prevent hypertension development in all applicable animal models except those with a markedly suppressed renin-angiotensin system; blood pressure lowering even persists for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment. This translates into a reduced mortality, particularly in models exhibiting marked hypertension. The retrieved data on vascular, cardiac and renal function and morphology as well as on glucose and lipid metabolism are discussed to address three main questions: 1. Can ARB effects on blood vessels, heart, kidney and metabolic function be explained by blood pressure lowering alone or are they additionally directly related to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system? 2. Are they shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, e.g. angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors? 3. Are some effects specific for one or more compounds within the ARB class? Taken together these data profile ARBs as a drug class with unique properties that have beneficial effects far beyond those on blood pressure reduction and, in some cases distinct from those of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The clinical relevance of angiotensin receptor-independent effects of some ARBs remains to be determined.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Antihypertensive Agents; Atherosclerosis; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Culture Techniques; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelium, Vascular; Gene Knockout Techniques; Glucose; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Lipid Metabolism; Metabolic Diseases; Oxadiazoles; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke; Telmisartan

Early phase studies of novel interventions for hypertension, such as renal sympathetic denervation, are sometimes single-armed (uncontrolled). We explored the wisdom of this by quantifying the blood pressure fall in the placebo arms of contemporary trials of hypertension. We searched Medline up to June 2014 and identified blinded, randomized trials of hypertension therapy in which the control arm received placebo medication or a sham (placebo) procedure. For nonresistant hypertension, we have identified all such trials of drugs licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2000 (5 drugs). This US Food and Drug Administration-related restriction was not applied to resistant hypertension trials. This produced 7451 patients, who were allocated to a blinded control from 52 trials of nonresistant hypertension and 694 patients from 8 trials of resistant hypertension (3 drugs and 2 interventions). Systolic blood pressure fell by 5.92 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 5.14-6.71; P<0.0001) in the nonresistant cohort and by 8.76 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 4.83-12.70; P<0.0001) in the resistant cohort. Using metaregression, the falls were larger in trials that did not use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as an inclusion criterion (z=2.84; P=0.0045), in those with higher baseline blood pressures (z=-0.3; P=0.0001), and in those where the patients were prescribed a continuous background of antihypertensives (z=-2.72; P=0.0065). The nontrivial magnitude of these apparent blood pressure reductions with perfectly ineffective intervention (placebo) illustrates that efficacy explorations of novel therapies for hypertension, once safety is established, should be performed with a randomized, appropriately controlled, and blinded design.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzopyrans; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Control Groups; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Eplerenone; Ethanolamines; Fumarates; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Kidney; Nebivolol; Oxadiazoles; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Research Design; Spironolactone; Sympathectomy; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Although there have been a number of azilsartan trials, no meta-analysis of the findings has been conducted to date. We performed the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of azilsartan therapy for the reduction of blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from the beginning of the records through March 2013 using web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID). Eligible studies were prospective randomized controlled trials of azilsartan (including azilsartan medoxomil) vs. any control therapy that reported clinic or 24-h mean BP as an outcome. For each study, data for the changes from baseline to final clinic systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in both the azilsartan group and the control group were used to generate mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of 27 potentially relevant articles screened initially, 7 reports of randomized trials of azilsartan or azilsartan medoxomil therapy enrolling a total of 6152 patients with hypertension were identified and included. Pooled analysis suggested a significant reduction in BP changes among patients randomized to 40 mg of azilsartan vs. control therapy (clinic SBP: -4.20 mm Hg; 95% CI: -6.05 to -2.35 mm Hg; P<0.00001; clinic DBP: -2.58 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.69 to -1.48 mm Hg; P<0.00001; 24-h mean SBP: -3.33 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.74 to -1.93 mm Hg; P<0.00001; 24-h mean DBP: -2.12 mm Hg; 95% CI: -2.74 to -1.49 mm Hg; P<0.00001). In conclusion, azilsartan therapy appears to provide a greater reduction in BP than control therapy in patients with hypertension.

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

The article is a review of published data on the efficacy and tolerability of a new representative of the class of angiotensin receptor blockers II (BRA) azilsartana registered for use in the Russian Federation in 2014. It is found that this drug has the advantage in comparison with several other members of the class BRA (valsartan, olmesartan, candesartan) and an ACE inhibitor ramipril in the form of more powerful antihypertensive effect.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Azilsartan medoxomil is the newest angiotensin receptor blocker marketed for the treatment of arterial hypertension. The aim of this article was to review the available evidence about this drug alone or combined with other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of hypertensive population.. For this purpose, a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The MEDLINE and EMBASE search included both medical subject headings (MeSHs) and keywords including azilsartan or azilsartan medoxomil or angiotensin receptor blockers or renin angiotensin system or chlorthalidone and hypertension. References of the retrieved articles were also screened for additional studies. There were no language restrictions.. Azilsartan medoxomil has a potent and persistent ability to inhibit binding of angiotensin II to AT1 receptors, which may play a role in its superior blood pressure (BP) -lowering efficacy compared with other drugs, including ramipril, candesartan, valsartan or olmesartan, without an increase of side effects. Chlortalidone is a diuretic which significantly differs from other classic thiazides and has largely demonstrated clinical benefits in outcome trials. The fixed-dose combination of azilsartan and chlorthalidone has been shown to be more effective than other potent combinations of angiotensin receptor blockers plus hydrochlorothiazide, with a good tolerability profile.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chlorthalidone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles

Azilsartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker (ARB), was recently approved by regulatory authorities for treatment of hypertension and is the 8th ARB to join the clinical market. This article discusses the medical reasons for introducing a new AT(1) receptor blocker and reviews the experimental and clinical studies that have compared the functional properties of azilsartan to those of other ARBs. The main question addressed is: Does azilsartan have distinguishing features that should motivate choosing it over any of the other sartans for use in clinical practice? Based on studies conducted to date in hypertensive patients without serious comorbidities, azilsartan appears to be characterized by a superior ability to control 24-hour systolic blood pressure (BP) relative to other widely used ARBs including valsartan, olmesartan, and candesartan, and presumably others as well (eg, losartan). Compared to these other ARBs, azilsartan may increase the BP target control and response rate by an absolute value of 8%-10%. Greater antihypertensive effects of azilsartan might be due in part to its unusually potent and persistent ability to inhibit binding of angiotensin II to AT(1) receptors. Preclinical studies have indicated that azilsartan may also have potentially beneficial effects on cellular mechanisms of cardiometabolic disease and insulin sensitizing activity that could involve more than just blockade of AT(1) receptors and/or reduction in BP. However, the clinical relevance of these additional actions is unknown. Given that the general ability of antihypertensive drugs to protect against target organ damage is largely mediated by their ability to decrease BP, the enhanced antihypertensive effects of azilsartan should serve to justify clinical interest in this ARB relative to other molecules in the class that have a lower capacity to reduce BP.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Appropriate control of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients still represents the major therapeutic goal in the treatment of hypertension. Despite the growing attention and wide range of antihypertensive agents available in the clinical scenario, the target of BP below the advised thresholds of 140/90 mmHg is, unfortunately, often unreached. For this reason, the search for new antihypertensive agents is still ongoing. Azilsartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin receptor blocker that has been recently introduced in the clinical arena, represents the eighth angiotensin receptor blocker currently available for BP control. The aim of this paper is to describe the efficacy and safety profile of this new compound, reviewing available data obtained from both pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Drug Interactions; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Hypertension; Insulin Resistance; Obesity; Oxadiazoles

Azilsartan-chlorthalidone fixed combination is a new drug in the management of hypertension. Azilsartan has been shown to have greater blood pressure-lowering effects than other angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), and the debate regarding the superiority of chlorthalidone over hydrochlorothiazide has been ongoing for years. The combination is unique because it is the first to partner an ARB with this, possibly more effective, diuretic. This review will address trials involving both components of this drug, as well as phase III trials involving the fixed-combination product. The article will also discuss the benefit of combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension.

Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Chlorthalidone; Diuretics; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Azilsartan is a new ARB with the specific and potent angiotensin II receptor binding-inhibitory effect and more continuous angiotensin II antagonistic and antihypertensive actions in pre-clinical studies compared with other ARBs. The controlled clinical study in Japanese hypertensive patients indicates that once-daily azilsartan dose provides more potent 24-hour sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety. Azilsartan was confirmed to improve more potently the insulin-resistance in SHR and type 2 diabetic mice and suppress more prominently the urinary albumin excretion in type 2 diabetic fatty rats than other ARBs. Thus, azilsartan is a unique antihypertensive agent with the profile of more beneficial pharmacological activity, and could provide higher rates of hypertension control over 24-hour following once daily administration.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Azilsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker indicated for the treatment of adult hypertension. A previous single-dose study suggested that azilsartan may also be a promising agent for paediatric hypertension. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of azilsartan in children have not been established.. We conducted a phase 3, single-arm, open-label, prospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azilsartan in pediatric patients with hypertension. Twenty-seven patients aged 6-15 years were treated with once-daily azilsartan for 52 weeks. The starting dose was 2.5 mg for patients weighing < 50 kg (N = 22) and 5 mg for patients weighing ≥ 50 kg (N = 5), with doses titrated up to a maximum of 20 and 40 mg, respectively.. Azilsartan showed acceptable tolerability at doses up to 20 mg in patients weighing < 50 kg and 40 mg in those weighing ≥ 50 kg. Most drug-related adverse events (AEs) were mild, with one patient (3.7%) experiencing a severe and serious drug-related AE (acute kidney injury). One patient (3.7%) had a mild increase in serum creatinine level, which resolved after treatment discontinuation. The blood pressure-lowering effect of azilsartan was observed as early as Week 2. Overall, approximately half of the patients achieved their target blood pressure at the end of azilsartan treatment.. Our study suggests that azilsartan has an acceptable safety profile in hypertensive patients aged 6-15 years. Azilsartan may be a promising agent for treating paediatric hypertension.

Topics: Adolescent; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Child; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies

Globally, women and men over the age of 25 years suffer from hypertension, the need for new treatment strategies to treat hypertension is due to the multi-faceted nature of the disease. Lack of optimal blood pressure control can lead to multiple complications. Therefore, this phase 3 study was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of potential product azilsartan hydrochloride for reduction in blood pressure in Indian patients with essential hypertension.. This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, comparative, parallel study of 303 participants over six weeks of treatment period with either azilsartan 40 mg or azilsartan 80 mg or telmisartan 40 mg in adult patients with essential hypertension. The primary endpoint was the change in mean trough sitting clinic systolic blood pressure (scSBP) from baseline to week 6. The secondary endpoints were the change in mean trough sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure (scDBP) from baseline and change in the 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP)and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline.. The change in mean trough scSBP from baseline to week 6 was -27.2 ± 9.99, -28.2 ± 10.06 and -26.7 ± 9.72 (Per Patient (PP) Population) and -27.2 ± 9.93, -28.3 ± 10.01 and -26.7 ± 9.67 (Intent to Treat (ITT) Population) in the azilsartan 40mg, 80mg and telmisartan 40mg groups respectively. The lower limit of 95% CI of difference in change in mean systolic blood pressure was -2.35(Azilsartan 40mg) and 1.32 (Azilsartan 80mg) is less than the non-inferiority margin (i.e. 2.67). The change in mean trough scDBP from baseline to week 6 was -13.1 ± 8.46, -12.9 ± 7.20, and -13.0 ± 7.96 (PP) and -13.1 ± 8.42, -12.9 ± 7.16 and -13.0 ± 7.92 (ITT) in Azilsartna 40 mg, Azilsartan 80 mg and Telmisartan 40 mg respectively. The reduction in trough scDBP in Azilsartan 40 mg (p=0.9461: PP; p=0.9330: ITT) and Azilsartan 80 mg (p=0.9090: PP; p=0.9158: ITT) was not statistically significant compared to Telmisartan 40 mg. The difference in fall in the trough scSBP, scDBP and ambulatory SBP and DBP was similar between the groups from baseline to week 6 (P >0.05). Headache and dizziness were the most frequent treatmentrelated treatment-emergent adverse events.. Azilsartan is an effective blood pressure lowering drug and well tolerated and was non- inferior to telmisartan in its safety and efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; India; Male; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Based on non-clinical data, it is expected that azilsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, will help improve insulin resistance in addition to its hypotensive action. The present study is aimed to explore the effect of azilsartan compared to telmisartan on insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients in the clinical setting.. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group exploratory study was conducted in Japan. We randomized adult patients (≥20 years old) with grade I or II essential hypertension and coexisting type 2 diabetes (1:1) to receive either oral azilsartan (20 mg/day;17 patients) or telmisartan (40 mg/day;16 patients) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the homeostasis model assessment ratio of insulin resistance (HOMA-R) from the baseline at the end of the treatment period. We also evaluated its safety and efficacy on other diabetes-related variables and blood pressure.. The mean changes in HOMA-R at the end of treatment were 0.22 (95% CI, -1.09-1.52) in the azilsartan group and -0.23 (95% CI, -0.72-0.27) in the telmisartan group. We found no clinically remarkable changes between the groups in diabetes-related variables such as fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c (NGSP), HOMA-β, or 1,5-anhydroglucitol. Reductions in clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed at week 4 and the reduced levels were maintained throughout the treatment period in both groups. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed. Only one drug-related TEAE (mild decrease in blood pressure) was reported in one patient in the azilsartan group.. Neither azilsartan nor telmisartan had any clinically remarkable effects on insulin resistance parameters when administered for 12 weeks to patients with grade I or II essential hypertension and coexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus. Azilsartan (20 mg/day) and telmisartan (40 mg/day) exerted comparable antihypertensive effects.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02079805.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Telmisartan

Previous studies suggest that the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized not only by high ventricular stiffness, but also by vascular stiffness. Azilsartan has higher vascular affinity compared with other angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which were proven to have no beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF in earlier clinical trials. We aimed to test the hypothesis that azilsartan may improve left ventricular diastolic function in HFpEF patients with hypertension in this trial.. The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Diastolic Function in Patients Suffering from Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: J-TASTE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, and assessor(s)-blinded, active controlled using candesartan, parallel-group clinical trial, to compare changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction between HFpEF patients with hypertension who have received candesartan or azilsartan for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in early diastolic wave height/early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e') assessed by echocardiography from the baseline to the end of the study (48 weeks). A total of 190 patients will be recruited into the study.. The design of the J-TASTE trial will provide data on whether differences between the effects of the two tested drugs on LV diastolic function exist in HFpEF patients with hypertension and will improve understanding of the pathophysiological role of vascular stiffness on diastolic function.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diastole; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oxadiazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Stiffness; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Young Adult

Many patients still have high blood pressure (BP) after treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Essential Hypertension; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Male; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The authors assessed the effects of switching from a conventional angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to azilsartan on blood pressure (BP) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Key eligibility criteria were uncontrolled hypertension treated for ≥ 1 month with an ARB, excluding azilsartan, that did not reach the target BP. We recruited 147 patients (64 males and 83 females; mean ± standard deviation age 73 ± 15 years). Azilsartan reduced both systolic and diastolic BP significantly, from 151 ± 16/82 ± 12 to 134 ± 17/73 ± 12 mm Hg, 3 months after switching. Although scores on the comprehensive QOL scale, the EuroQoL 5 dimensions (EQ5D), and the simplified menopausal index (SMI) did not change, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score improved significantly, and there was a significant association between the change in the GDS score and systolic BP lowering (r = 0.2554, P = 0.030). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) improved significantly only in the female subgroup. Besides sufficient BP lowering activity, anti-hypertensive treatment with azilsartan may have a favorable impact on depression in geriatric patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind dose-ranging study. Hypertensive adults (n=555) received one of five doses of azilsartan (AZL; 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg), olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) 20 mg, or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was change in trough clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at week 8. Compared with placebo, all AZL doses (except 2.5 mg) provided statistically and clinically significant reductions in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) based on both clinic blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). AZL 40 mg was statistically superior vs OLM. Clinic BP was associated with a pronounced placebo effect (-6 mm Hg), whereas this was negligible with ABPM (±0.5 mm Hg). Adverse event frequency was similar in the AZL and placebo groups. Based on these and other findings, subsequent trials investigated the commercial AZL medoxomil tablet at doses 20 to 80 mg/d using 24-hour ABPM.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure Determination; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Double Bind Interaction; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Olmesartan Medoxomil; Oxadiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Olmesartan and azilsartan, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), are expected to decrease blood pressure more than the other ARBs. We conducted randomized-controlled trials to compare the practical efficacy of olmesartan with azilsartan.. Eighty-four patients treated with the conventional ARBs for more than 3 months were assigned randomly to receive either 20 mg of olmesartan (olmesartan medoxomil, OL group) or 20 mg of azilsartan (azilsartan, not azilsartan medoxomil, AZ group) once daily for 16 weeks. The practical efficacy on blood pressure was compared between the OL and AZ groups.. Office blood pressure of both groups decreased significantly (OL group: 152/86-141/79 mmHg, P<0.05, AZ group: 149/83-135/75 mmHg; P<0.05). Diastolic home blood pressure in the AZ group decreased significantly (79±9-74±7 mmHg; P<0.05), but not in the OL group (79±11-75±10 mmHg; P=0.068). However, there were no significant differences between the groups. The dosage of olmesartan and azilsartan increased significantly and slightly for 16 weeks (OL group: 20.3-23.1 mg; P<0.05, AZ group: 20.5-23.2 mg; P<0.05), without a significant difference between groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in renal function, lipid profiles, brain natriuretic peptide, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, and urinary L-type fatty acid-binding protein between the two groups.. Both olmesartan and azilsartan equally reduced blood pressures. Both olmesartan and azilsartan showed a renoprotective effect and were well tolerated without any major adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Overseas guidelines to manage hypertension recommend selecting different drugs depending on age, but no studies have investigated the relationship between drug selection and age- and sex-related differences, although such information may help to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality. The Azilsartan Circadian and Sleep Pressure--the First Study (ACS1) trial was a multicentered, randomized, open-label, two-parallel group study comparing the effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (azilsartan) and a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine). The present study is a post hoc analysis of ACS1 to investigate age- and sex-related differences in the antihypertensive effects between azilsartan and amlodipine. Azilsartan significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure in male patients younger than 60 years compared with amlodipine, but amlodipine significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in female patients 60 years and older compared with azilsartan. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes will demonstrate whether a diastolic blood pressure-lowering effect with azilsartan is significantly effective in male patients younger than 60 years.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Calcium Channel Blockers; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Sex Characteristics; Treatment Outcome

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been widely used to treat hypertension and large-scale clinical studies have shown various benefits. In this study, we compared olmesartan with azilsartan, the newest ARB.. The subjects were outpatients who were clinically stable after cardiac surgery. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either azilsartan or olmesartan for 1 year and were switched to the other drug for the following 1 year. The primary endpoints were the levels of plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone.. Home blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and additional antihypertensive medication was administered to 12 patients (20 episodes) in the azilsartan group versus 4 patients (4 episodes) in the olmesartan group, with the number being significantly higher in the azilsartan group. After 1 year of treatment, both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Left ventricular mass index was also significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group.. This study showed that olmesartan reduces angiotensin II and aldosterone levels more effectively than azilsartan. Accordingly, it may be effective in patients with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity after cardiac surgery or patients with severe cardiac hypertrophy.

Topics: Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Substitution; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Imidazoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Remodeling

Sleep blood pressure (BP), which is partly determined by salt sensitivity and intake, is an important cardiovascular risk in hypertensives. However, there have been no studies on age-related differences in the sleep BP-lowering effect between angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers in Asians. Azilsartan Circadian and Sleep Pressure-the 1st Study was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-parallel-group study conducted to compare the efficacy of 8-week oral treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (azilsartan 20 mg) or a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine 5 mg) on sleep BP as evaluated by ambulatory BP monitoring. Among the overall population, amlodipine treatment achieved significantly greater reduction in sleep BP, awake BP, and 24-hour BP than azilsartan treatment. BP reduction by amlodipine was particularly pronounced in elderly hypertensive patients aged ≥60 years old. Among patients ≥60 years old, the amlodipine group had numerically, but not significantly, higher control rate of sleep BP compared with the azilsartan group. Similar results were found for awake BP and 24-hour BP. These results suggest a greater BP reduction/control by amlodipine compared with azilsartan and that reduction/control of BP by amlodipine was also more effective in the elderly population. As recommended in the American Society of Hypertension/The international Society of Hypertension and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for differentiating treatment according to age, amlodipine should be one of the options for starting treatment in the elderly population. CLINICAL TRIAL URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01762501 CLINICAL TRIAL ID: NCT01762501.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Sleep; Treatment Outcome

We investigated whether 10 mg per day of azilsartan, one-half of the normal dosage, would be non-inferior to 8 mg per day of candesartan cilexetil for controlling blood pressure in Japanese patients with hypertension. In this open-label, randomized, crossover trial, 309 hypertensive Japanese adults treated with 8-mg candesartan cilexetil were randomized into two arms and received either 10-mg azilsartan or 8-mg candesartan cilexetil in a crossover manner. The primary efficacy outcome was systolic blood pressure, and the margin of non-inferiority was set to be 2.5 mm Hg. The participants were 67±11 years old, and 180 (58%) were male. The baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were 127.1±13.2 and 69.7±11.2 mm Hg, respectively. During the study period, the difference in systolic blood pressure between the treatments with 10-mg azilsartan and 8-mg candesartan cilexetil was -1.7 mm Hg, with the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from -3.2 to -0.2 mm Hg. The upper boundary of the 95% CI was below the margin of 2.5 mm Hg, confirming the non-inferiority of 10-mg azilsartan to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil. The difference also reached significance (P=0.037). The corresponding difference in diastolic blood pressure was -1.4 (95% CI: -2.4 to -0.4) mm Hg (P=0.006). Treatment with 10-mg azilsartan was similar to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil in its association with rare adverse events. In conclusion, 10-mg azilsartan was non-inferior to 8-mg candesartan cilexetil for controlling systolic blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive patients already being treated with 8-mg candesartan cilexetil.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend using drugs with different mechanisms of action in antihypertensive regimens that include simple single-pill fixed-dose combination (FDC) products.. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the FDC of azilsartan (AZI) and amlodipine besylate (AML) with those of AZI monotherapy and AML monotherapy in Japanese patients with grade 1 to 2 essential hypertension.. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. After receiving placebo during a 4-week run-in period in a single-blind manner, patients were randomized to receive 1 of the following 5 treatments for 8 weeks: FDC containing AZI 20 mg and AML 5 mg (AZI/AML 20/5 mg), FDC containing AZI 20 mg and AML 2.5 mg (AZI/AML 20/2.5 mg), AZI 20 mg, AML 5 mg, or AML 2.5 mg once daily in a fasting or fed state. The primary end point was the change from baseline (week 0) in the seated trough diastolic blood pressure at week 8 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]), and the secondary end point was the change from baseline in the seated trough systolic blood pressure at week 8 (LOCF). Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and physical examination findings.. Of the 800 patients who provided informed consent, 603 were randomized to receive AZI/AML 20/5 mg (150 patients), AZI/AML 20/2.5 mg (151 patients), AZI 20 mg (151 patients), AML 5 mg (75 patients), or AML 2.5 mg (76 patients). The mean baseline systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 160.7/100.3 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in seated blood pressure at week 8 (LOCF) was -35.3/-22.3 mm Hg in the AZI/AML 20/5 mg group and -31.4/-19.2 mm Hg in the AZI/AML 20/2.5 mg group, indicating a reduction significantly greater than that in corresponding monotherapy groups (-21.5/-13.9 mm Hg in the AZI 20 mg group, -26.4/-15.5 mm Hg in the AML 5 mg group, and -19.3/-11.6 mm Hg in the AML 2.5 mg group; p < 0.0001 for all contrast tests). No remarkable difference was found in the incidences of adverse events, vital signs, and physical examination findings among the treatment groups.. This study found that the FDC of AZI/AML 20/5 mg and 20/2.5 mg exhibited greater antihypertensive effects compared with each monotherapy. The FDC of AZI/AML had a similar safety profile to that of each monotherapy and was tolerable to Japanese patients with grade 1 to 2 essential hypertension.. Japic CTI-111606.

Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles

The ACS1 (Azilsartan Circadian and Sleep Pressure - the first study) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, two parallel-group study carried out to investigate the efficacy of an 8-week oral treatment with azilsartan 20 mg in comparison with amlodipine 5 mg.. The patients with stage I or II primary hypertension will be randomly assigned to either an azilsartan group (n=350) or an amlodipine group (n=350). The primary endpoint is a change in nocturnal systolic blood pressure (BP) as measured by ambulatory BP monitoring at the end of follow-up relative to the baseline level during the run-in period. In addition, we will carry out the same analysis after dividing four different nocturnal BP dipping statuses (extreme-dippers, dippers, nondipper, and risers).. The findings of this study will help in establishing an appropriate antihypertensive treatment for hypertensive patients with a disrupted circadian BP rhythm.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Circadian Rhythm; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Sleep

Morning blood pressure (BP) surge is reported as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and end-organ damage independent of the 24-h BP level. Controlling morning BP surge is therefore important to help prevent onset of cardiovascular disease. We compared the efficacy of azilsartan and candesartan in controlling morning systolic BP (SBP) surges by analyzing relevant ambulatory BP monitoring data in patients with/without baseline BP surges. As part of a 16-week randomized, double-blind study of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily) and candesartan (8-12 mg once daily) in Japanese patients with essential hypertension, an exploratory analysis was carried out using ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline and week 14. The effects of study drugs on morning BP surges, including sleep trough surge (early morning SBP minus the lowest night-time SBP) and prewaking surge (early morning SBP minus SBP before awakening), were evaluated. Patients with sleep trough surge of at least 35 mmHg were defined by the presence of a morning BP surge (the 'surge group'). Sleep trough surge and prewaking surge data were available at both baseline and week 14 in 548 patients, 147 of whom (azilsartan 76; candesartan 71) had a baseline morning BP surge. In surge group patients, azilsartan significantly reduced both the sleep trough surge and the prewaking surge at week 14 compared with candesartan (least squares means of the between-group differences -5.8 mmHg, P=0.0395; and -5.7 mmHg, P=0.0228, respectively). Once-daily azilsartan improved sleep trough surge and prewaking surge to a greater extent than candesartan in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Arterial hypertension is highly prevalent but poorly controlled. Blood pressure (BP) reduction substantially reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent randomized, double-blind clinical trials demonstrated that azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) is more effective in reducing BP than the ubiquitary ACE inhibitor ramipril. Therefore, we aimed to test whether these can be verified under clinical practice conditions.. The "Treatment with Azilsartan Compared to ACE-Inhibitors in Anti-Hypertensive Therapy" (EARLY) registry is a prospective, observational, national, multicenter registry with a follow-up of up to 12 months. It will include up to 5000 patients on AZM or ACE-inhibitor monotherapy in a ratio of 7 to 3. A subgroup of patients will undergo 24-hour BP monitoring. EARLY has two co-primary objectives: 1) Description of the safety profile of azilsartan and 2) achievement of BP targets based on recent national and international guidelines for patients treated with azilsartan in comparison to those treated with ACE-inhibitors. The most important secondary endpoints are the determination of persistence with treatment and the documentation of cardiovascular and renal events. Recruitment commenced in January 2012 and will be completed by February 2013.. The data obtained will supplement previous results from randomized controlled trials to document the potential value of utilizing azilsartan medoxomil in comparison to ACE-inhibitor treatment for target BP achievement in clinical practice.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Registries; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Abnormal variations in night-time hypertension such as "non-dipping" type (< 10% decrease in nocturnal systolic blood pressure [SBP] from daytime SBP) are a risk factor for cardiovascular events independent of 24-h BP.. As part of a randomized, double-blind study of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily) and candesartan (8-12 mg once daily) in Japanese patients with essential hypertension, an exploratory analysis was performed using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at baseline and Week 14. Effects of study drugs on nocturnal BP variations according to patients' nocturnal SBP dipping status were evaluated.. ABPM data were available for 273 patients treated with azilsartan and 275 with candesartan. In the dipping group (≥ 10% decrease from daytime SBP), azilsartan produced a greater reduction from baseline in daytime than in night-time SBP (- 14.1 and - 10.9 mmHg, respectively), and the change in daytime SBP was significantly greater with azilsartan than with candesartan (p = 0.0077). In the non-dipping group, azilsartan produced a greater reduction from baseline in night-time than in daytime SBP (- 20.2 and - 9.9 mmHg, respectively), and reductions in both night-time SBP (p = 0.02) and daytime SBP (p = 0.0042) were significantly greater with azilsartan than with candesartan.. Once-daily azilsartan improved non-dipping night-time SBP to a greater extent than candesartan in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Circadian Rhythm; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, with that of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan; 8-12 mg once daily by forced titration) in 622 Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension. Efficacy was evaluated by clinic-measured sitting BP, and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at week 14. Participants (mean age: 57 years, 61% males) had a mean baseline sitting BP of 159.8/100.4 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP at week 16 (primary endpoint) was -12.4 mm Hg in the azilsartan group and -9.8 mm Hg in the candesartan group, demonstrating a statistically significant greater reduction with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -2.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.08 to -1.22 mm Hg, P=0.0003). The week 16 (secondary endpoint) mean change from baseline in sitting systolic BP was -21.8 mm Hg and -17.5 mm Hg, respectively, a significant decrease with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -4.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.53 to -2.20 mm Hg, P<0.0001). On ABPM, the week 14 mean changes from baseline in diastolic and systolic BP were also significantly greater with azilsartan over a 24-h period, and during the daytime, night-time and early morning. Safety and tolerability were similar among the two groups. These data demonstrate that once-daily azilsartan provides a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Severity of Illness Index; Tetrazoles

Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a unique angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) under development for the treatment of hypertension. To compare this ARB with another in the class, the authors studied the effects of AZL-M and valsartan (VAL) in 984 patients with primary hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study using ambulatory and clinic blood pressure (BP) measurements. The primary end point was change from baseline in 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic BP following 24 weeks of treatment. Hierarchical analysis testing for noninferiority was followed by superiority testing of AZL-M (80 mg then 40 mg) vs VAL. The mean age of participants was 58 years, 52% were men, and 15% were black. Baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was similar (approximately 145.6 mm Hg) in each group. AZL-M 40 mg and 80 mg lowered 24-hour mean systolic BP (-14.9 mm Hg and -15.3 mm Hg, respectively) more than VAL 320 mg (-11.3 mm Hg; P<.001 for 40-mg and 80-mg comparisons vs VAL). Clinic systolic BP reductions were consistent with the ambulatory results (-14.9 mm Hg for AZL-M 40 mg and -16.9 mm Hg for AZL-M 80 mg vs -11.6 mm Hg for VAL; P=.015 and P<.001, respectively). The reductions in 24-hour mean and clinic diastolic BPs were also greater with both doses of AZL-M than with VAL (P≤.001 for all comparisons). Small, reversible changes in serum creatinine occurred more often with AZL-M than with VAL; otherwise, safety and tolerability parameters were similar among the three groups. These data demonstrate that AZL-M across the effective dose range had superior efficacy to VAL at its maximal recommended dose without any meaningful increase in adverse events. These findings suggest that AZL-M could provide higher rates of hypertension control compared with other ARBs in the class.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biological Availability; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Sex Factors; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Valsartan

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in 23 hemodialysis patients with hypertension (mean age 70 years; male 69.6%) after switching from azilsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. Both at baseline and 3 months after the start of sacubitril/valsartan treatment, home blood pressure (BP), BP values during hemodialysis, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level were measured. The mean dosage of azilsartan was 30 ± 10 mg/day at baseline and that of sacubitril/valsartan after 3 months of treatment was 204 ± 64 mg/day. After 3 months, significant reductions in mean morning home BP (155 ± 17/80 ± 12 to 147 ± 16/76 ± 11 mmHg), mean nighttime home systolic BP (153 ± 19 to 144 ± 16 mmHg), and median (IQRs) NT-proBNP level [8124 (2620-13 394) to 6271 (1570-9591) pg/mL] were observed (all P < .05), whereas BP values during hemodialysis did not change significantly. In hemodialysis patients, except for hypotension, sacubitril/valsartan was generally well tolerated, effectively controlled out-of-office BP, and improved NT-proBNP.

Topics: Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with increased bone loss due to excessive activity of the local renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Angiotensinogen/Angiotensin (ANG) II/Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) axis is considered as the core axis regulating RAS activity. Azilsartan is an FDA-approved selective AT1R antagonist that is used to treat hypertension. This study aimed to determine whether azilsartan affects formation of osteoclast, resorption of bone, and the expression of cytokines linked with osteoclastogenesis during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-triggered inflammation. Azilsartan-treated calvariae exhibited significantly lower bone resorption and osteoclastogenesis than those treated with LPS alone.. These findings imply that azilsartan prevents LPS-triggered TNF-α production in macrophages, which in turn prevents LPS-Triggered osteoclast formation and bone resorption

Topics: Animals; Bone Resorption; Hypertension; Inflammation; Lipopolysaccharides; Macrophages; Mice; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Osteogenesis; RNA, Messenger; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Regional differences in the profile and treatment strategies of patients with cardiometabolic diseases have been studied in several different countries. The Cardio-Vascular and metabolic treatments in Canada: Assessment of REal-life therapeutic value (CV-CARE) registry was designed to evaluate patient profiles and medical management of cardiometabolic diseases in routine clinical care settings across Canada. Primary objectives were to (1) evaluate regional variability of patient profiles with cardiometabolic disease(s) and (2) assess treatment differences of patients treated for type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypercholesterolemia (HCh), and hypertension (HTN) across Canada.. CV-CARE is a multi-center, observational, prospective registry that enrolled Canadian patients treated with metformin-extended release (MetER) for T2D, colesevelam (C) for HCh, azilsartan (AZI) for mild-to-moderate essential HTN and azilsartan/chlorthalidone (AZI/CHL) for severe, essential HTN. Patient characteristics and treatments were assessed at baseline.. The registry enrolled 6960 patients, with a total of 4194 patients making up the primary analysis population [MetER (n=995); C (n=1639); AZI (n=1364); AZI/CHL (n=498)]. First-line use of MetER was more common in British Columbia (BC; 45.5%) compared to Ontario (ON; 29.8%), and Quebec (QC; 12.9%). C treatment for HCh was used as monotherapy most readily in BC (68.7%) compared with QC (59.7%) and ON (35.8%). Dual action of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A1c reduction was the predominant reason for C add-on therapy (46.8%), with highest usage seen in ON (62.9%). AZI treatment for HTN was most frequently used in BC (43.8%), and AZI/CHL was most commonly used in ON (12.0%). First-line use of AZI was more common in QC (50%) vs. ON (34.9%) and BC (24.1%). The primary reason for switching to AZI and AZI/CHL from prior treatment was lack of efficacy across provinces.. This is the first regional description of the CV-CARE cohort. Significant variations in both baseline profile and treatments were observed which could have an impact on long-term outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Canada; Chlorthalidone; Colesevelam Hydrochloride; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles

The CV-CARE registry provides RWE in Canadian routine clinical practice.. In a real-world Canadian setting, MetER, C, AZI, AZI/CHL, and TXC show improvement of the cardiometabolic profile of T2D, HCh, and HTN patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Canada; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorthalidone; Colesevelam Hydrochloride; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Registries; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chlorthalidone; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Olmesartan Medoxomil; Oxadiazoles; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Tetrazoles

We examined whether the stimulation of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor increases the expression of the cardiac (pro)renin receptor ((P)RR) and its downstream signals and whether the blockade of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor by azilsartan decreases the expression of the cardiac (P)RR and its signaling in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) with a high-salt intake. Rats received normal-salt (0.9%) chow, high-salt (8.9%) chow, normal-salt chow with 1 mg/day of azilsartan, and high-salt chow with 1 mg/day of azilsartan from 6 to 12 weeks of age. Rats with normal-salt chow were administered 100 ng/kg/min of angiotensin II by osmotic minipump from 6 to 12 weeks of age. A high-salt diet and angiotensin II significantly increased the systolic blood pressure; overexpressed cardiac (P)RR, phosphorylated (p)-ERK1/2, p-p38MAPK, p-HSP27, and TGF-ß1; enhanced cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis, cardiomyocyte size, interventricular septum (IVS) thickness, and left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension; and decreased LV fractional shortening. Azilsartan decreased systolic blood pressure, cardiac expressions of (P)RR, p-ERK1/2, p-p38MAPK, p-HSP27, and TGF-ß1, cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis, cardiomyocyte size, and LV diastolic dimension, and improved LV fractional shortening. In conclusion, azilsartan attenuates cardiac damage caused by high salt intake through the downregulation of the cardiac (pro)renin receptor and its downstream signals in SHRs.

Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Down-Regulation; Heart; Hypertension; Myocardium; Oxadiazoles; Phosphorylation; Prorenin Receptor; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Receptors, Cell Surface; Signal Transduction; Sodium Chloride, Dietary; Transforming Growth Factor beta1

The increasing popularity of noninferiority trials reflects the ongoing efforts to replace existing treatments (reference treatments) with new treatments (experimental treatments) that retain a substantial fraction of the effect of the reference treatments. The adoption of any new treatment has to be vindicated by a demonstration of benefits that outweigh a possible clinically insignificant reduction in the reference treatment efficacy. Statistical methods have been developed to analyze data collected from noninferiority trials. However, these methods focus on cases with only one reference treatment. In this paper, we provide the statistical inferential procedures for situations with multiple reference treatments. The computation of the corresponding critical values for simultaneous testings of noninferiority of several new treatments to multiple reference treatments in the presence of a placebo is provided. Furthermore, for a prespecified level of test power, a technique to determine the optimal sample size before the onset of a noninferiority trial is derived. A clinical example is given to illustrate our proposed procedure.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Oxadiazoles; Reference Standards; Research Design; Sample Size; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

The number of elderly patients with hypertension has been steadily increasing. However, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of the new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) azilsartan in elderly patients with hypertension. We investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of azilsartan in this population.. The study population comprised 56 ambulatory patients with essential hypertension. We evaluated the reduction in blood pressure and safety after 12 weeks of treatment with azilsartan in 29 hypertensive patients ≥65 years of age (aged group) in comparison with the findings in 27 patients <65 years of age (non-aged group).. Systolic blood pressure in the aged group declined significantly from 155 ± 18 mmHg at baseline to 138 ± 11 mmHg after 12 weeks of treatment with azilsartan, and that in the non-aged group also declined significantly from 152 ± 20 mmHg at baseline to 142 ± 13 mmHg after 12 weeks of treatment with azilsartan. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of change in blood pressures from pre-treatment to post-treatment with azilsartan between the non-aged and aged groups. There were no changes in clinical laboratory findings, including serum levels of creatinine, potassium, lipids, and other metabolic variables, after 12 weeks of treatment with azilsartan in both groups.. Our findings suggest that azilsartan is effective in lowering blood pressure in elderly patients and may be safe. Therefore, azilsartan could be a valuable option for treating hypertension in elderly and non-elderly patients.

Topics: Aged; Ambulatory Care; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Oxadiazoles; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Registries

Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M), has been demonstrated to be more effective than the other sartans currently in use; however, there is insufficient information available comparing it with ACE-inhibitors. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZL-M with that of ACE-inhibitors in a real life clinical setting.. The EARLY registry is a prospective, observational, national, multicentre registry with a follow-up period of 12 months. There were two principal objectives: 1) documentation of the achievement of target BP values set according to recent national and international guidelines, and 2) description of the safety profile of AZL-M.. A total of 3 849 patients with essential arterial hypertension were recruited from primary care offices in Germany. Patients who initiated monotherapy at baseline comprising either AZL-M or an ACE-inhibitor were included at a ratio of seven to three. Results demonstrated that a blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the AZL-M group (61.1 %) compared with the ACE-inhibitor group (56.4 %; p < 0.05; OR, 1.21; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.42), with this finding maintained after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. AZL-M appeared to have an equivalent safety profile to the ACE-inhibitors, with a similar incidence of adverse events in the two patient groups (p = 0.73).. These data add to the results of previous randomized controlled clinical trials suggesting that, compared with other agents that target the renin-angiotensin system, AZL-M provides statistically significant albeit small improvements in blood pressure control.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Arterial Pressure; Benzimidazoles; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Germany; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Oxadiazoles; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Registries; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to examine the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect and the time to attain the maximal antihypertensive effect (stabilization time) of several angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) based on home BP measurements.. We surveyed consecutive newly diagnosed, untreated patients with hypertension who started the treatment with a mid-level dose of one of seven ARBs (losartan 50 mg, telmisartan 40 mg, candesartan 8 mg, olmesartan 20 mg, valsartan 80 mg, irbesartan 100 mg, or azilsartan 20 mg). All study participants measured home BP in the morning for at least 1 week during an untreated period and 4 weeks during the treatment period.. Age, the proportion of men, and baseline home BP levels did not differ significantly between groups (total n = 232; age, 62.2 years; 50.9% men; home SBP/DBP, 151.6/90.0 mmHg). Significant differences in the BP-lowering effect and the stabilization time between ARBs were observed (P ≤ 0.02). The extent of BP-lowering effects of azilsartan 20 mg was significantly greater than that of valsartan 80 mg or irbesartan 100 mg (15.3 vs. 7.9 or 8.2 mmHg, respectively P ≤ 0.03). The stabilization time of losartan for home SBP was significantly longer than that of valsartan, irbesartan, or azilsartan (22.8 vs. 7.1, 4.7, or 7.1 days, respectively, P ≤ 0.01).. The maximum effect and the stabilization time differed among ARBs used at the mid-level dose in Japan. An ARB should be chosen based on its desired characteristics.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Irbesartan; Losartan; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Self Care; Telmisartan; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Valsartan

Abnormal elevation of blood pressure in early morning (rest-to-active phase) is suggested to cause cardiovascular events. We investigated whether azilsartan (AZL), a novel potent angiotensin receptor blocker, suppresses blood pressure elevation from the light-rest to dark-active phase in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). AZL has a sustained depressor effect around the rest-to-active phase in SHRs to a greater extent than candesartan (CAN), despite their similar depressor effects for over 24 h. AZL did not cause sympathoexcitation. These results suggest that AZL has a more sustained depressor effect than CAN around the rest-to-active phase in SHRs, and might have advantages for early morning hypertension.

Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Hypertension; Male; Oxadiazoles; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rest; Tetrazoles

Activation of angiotensin (ANG) II type 1 receptors (AT1R) promotes vasoconstriction, inflammation, and renal dysfunction. In this study, we addressed the ability of azilsartan (AZL), a new AT1R antagonist, to modulate levels of plasma ANG-(1-7) and renal epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE).. Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with ANG II (125 ng/min) or vehicle (VEH). AZL (3 mg/kg/day) or VEH was administered starting 1 day prior to ANG II or VEH infusion. On day 10, plasma was obtained for measurement of ANG-(1-7) and kidneys for isolation of microvessels for EET and 20-HETE determination and histological evaluation.. Mean 24-hour blood pressure (BP) was not different between VEH and AZL treatment groups, whereas the BP elevation with ANG II infusion (121 ± 5 mm Hg) was completely normalized with AZL cotreatment (86 ± 3 mm Hg). The ANG II-induced renal damage was attenuated and cardiac hypertrophy prevented with AZL cotreatment. Plasma ANG-(1-7) levels (pg/ml) were increased with AZL treatment (219 ± 22) and AZL + ANG II infusion (264 ± 93) compared to VEH controls (74.62 ± 8). AZL treatment increased the ratio of EETs to their dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (DHET) metabolites and reduced 20-HETE levels.. Treatment with AZL completely antagonized the elevation of BP induced by ANG II, prevented cardiac hypertrophy, attenuated renal damage, and increased ANG-(1-7) and EET/DHET ratio while diminishing 20-HETE levels. Increased ANG-(1-7) and EETs levels may emerge as novel therapeutic mechanisms contributing to the antihypertensive and antihypertrophic actions of AZL treatment and their relative role compared to AT1R blockade may depend on the etiology of the hypertension.

Topics: Angiotensin I; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Disease Models, Animal; Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic Acids; Hypertension; Hypertension, Renovascular; Male; Oxadiazoles; Peptide Fragments; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Vasoconstriction

For patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are usually the first-line therapies. There is, however, no real-life data regarding the relative clinical effectiveness and tolerability of either drug class. The prospective registry, Treatment With Azilsartan Compared to ACE Inhibitors in Antihypertensive Therapy (EARLY), was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the ARB azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) vs ACE inhibitors in real-world patients. Of the 1153 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension who were included in the registry, 789 were prescribed AZL-M and 364 were prescribed an ACE inhibitor. After multivariate adjustment, AZL-M was found to provide superior blood pressure reduction and better target blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) achievement. The proportion of patients with adverse events was not statistically different between groups. The authors conclude that in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, AZL-M provides superior blood pressure control with a similar safety profile compared with ACE inhibitors.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Oxadiazoles; Prospective Studies; Ramipril; Registries

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles

Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypertension; Oxadiazoles; Tetrazoles; Valsartan

Advantages of the new angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) include once daily dosing, an absence of significant adverse reactions, well tolerated side effect profile and cost effectiveness. A growing realization is their beneficial pleotropic effects. Antihypertensive agents are widely used to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events partly beyond that of blood pressure-lowering. The RAAS, and its primary mediator Ang II, also have a direct influence on the progression of the atherosclerotic process via effects on endothelial function, inflammation, fibrinolytic balance, and plaque stability. For patients at high cardiovascular risk based on the results of the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies, telmisartan is indicated for cardiovascular prevention. Studies have shown that olmesartan medoxomil treatment may slow the progression of atherosclerosis and postpone albuminuria thereby potentially improving CV outcomes.

Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atherosclerosis; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Olmesartan Medoxomil; Oxadiazoles; Telmisartan; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Hypertension often coexists with insulin resistance. However, most metabolic effects of the antihypertensive agents have been investigated in nomotensive animals, in which different conclusions may arise. We investigated the metabolic effects of the new angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker azilsartan using the obese Koletsky rats superimposed on the background of the spontaneously hypertensive rats.. Male Koletsky rats were treated with azilsartan (2 mg/kg/day) over 3 weeks. Blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff. Blood biochemical and hormonal parameters were determined by enzymatic or ELISA methods. Gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR.. In Koletsky rats, azilsartan treatment lowered blood pressure, basal plasma insulin concentration and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index, and inhibited over-increase of plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during oral glucose tolerance test. These effects were accompanied by decreases in both food intake and body weight (BW) increase. Although two treatments showed the same effect on BW gain, insulin sensitivity was higher after azilsartan treatment than pair-feeding. Azilsartan neither affected plasma concentrations of triglyceride and free fatty acids, nor increased adipose mRNA levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ and its target genes such as adiponectin, aP2. In addition, azilsartan downregulated 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression.. These results show the insulin-sensitizing effect of azilsartan in obese Koletsky rats. This effect is independent of decreases in food intake and BW increase or of the activation of adipose PPARγ. Our findings indicate the possible usefulness of azilsartan in the treatment of metabolic syndrome.

Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Hypertension; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Obesity; Oxadiazoles; Polymerase Chain Reaction; PPAR gamma; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR