azathioprine has been researched along with Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous, Subacute in 16 studies
Azathioprine: An immunosuppressive agent used in combination with cyclophosphamide and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. According to the Fourth Annual Report on Carcinogens (NTP 85-002, 1985), this substance has been listed as a known carcinogen. (Merck Index, 11th ed)
azathioprine : A thiopurine that is 6-mercaptopurine in which the mercapto hydrogen is replaced by a 1-methyl-4-nitroimidazol-5-yl group. It is a prodrug for mercaptopurine and is used as an immunosuppressant, prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory conditions and after organ transplantation and also for treatment of Crohn's didease and MS.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Chloroquine may increase complete clinical response at 12 months' follow-up compared with placebo (absence of skin lesions) (risk ratio (RR) 1." | 2.72 | Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. ( Bennett, C; Chen, S; Hannon, CW; Lima, HC; McCourt, C, 2021) |
"Azathioprine sodium has been reported to be effective therapy for chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) but rarely for chronic cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LV)." | 2.67 | Azathioprine. An effective, corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus or with recalcitrant cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. ( Burruss, JB; Callen, JP; Holtman, J; Spencer, LV, 1991) |
"Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is a rare cutaneous manifestation of SLE presenting as tense vesiculobullous eruptions in a photosensitive distribution." | 1.91 | Successful treatment of bullous lupus with corticosteroids and belimumab: A case report. ( Bansal, P; Fibeger, E; Keshavamurthy, C; Virata, A, 2023) |
"Lupus profundus, often known as lupus panniculitis, is a rare form of persistent cutaneous lupus erythematosus." | 1.72 | Intravenous immunoglobulin in the management of refractory lupus profundus. ( Abdulla, FA; Elarabi, M; Namas, R, 2022) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 3 (18.75) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 4 (25.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 6 (37.50) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (18.75) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Keshavamurthy, C | 1 |
Fibeger, E | 1 |
Virata, A | 1 |
Bansal, P | 1 |
Namas, R | 1 |
Abdulla, FA | 1 |
Elarabi, M | 1 |
Hannon, CW | 1 |
McCourt, C | 1 |
Lima, HC | 1 |
Chen, S | 1 |
Bennett, C | 1 |
Xuan, D | 1 |
Yu, Y | 1 |
Shao, L | 1 |
Wang, J | 1 |
Zhang, W | 1 |
Zou, H | 1 |
Renner, R | 1 |
Sticherling, M | 1 |
Cisneros, CG | 1 |
Romiti, R | 1 |
Santi, CG | 1 |
Aoki, V | 1 |
Valente, NY | 1 |
Nico, MM | 1 |
Raptopoulou, A | 1 |
Linardakis, C | 1 |
Sidiropoulos, P | 1 |
Kritikos, HD | 1 |
Boumpas, DT | 1 |
Knott, HM | 1 |
Martínez, JD | 1 |
Kuhn, A | 1 |
Ruland, V | 1 |
Bonsmann, G | 1 |
Richmond, BW | 1 |
Cole, MB | 1 |
Dash, A | 1 |
Eyler, A | 1 |
Boomershine, CS | 1 |
Roy-Peaud, F | 1 |
Paccalin, M | 1 |
Le Moal, G | 1 |
Landron, C | 1 |
Juhel, L | 1 |
Roblot, P | 1 |
Becq-Giraudon, B | 1 |
Heath, M | 1 |
Raugi, GJ | 1 |
Wenzel, J | 1 |
Bieber, T | 1 |
Uerlich, M | 1 |
Tüting, T | 1 |
Callen, JP | 3 |
Cohen, LM | 1 |
Tyring, SK | 1 |
Rády, P | 1 |
Spencer, LV | 1 |
Burruss, JB | 1 |
Holtman, J | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of R333 6% Ointment Administered Topically to Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients With Active Cut[NCT01597050] | Phase 2 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-08-31 | Completed | ||
A PHASE 2, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CC-220 IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS[NCT03161483] | Phase 2 | 289 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-08-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind. Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Acute Severe SLE Flares Excluding Renal or Neurological Systems[NCT00111306] | Phase 3 | 510 participants | Interventional | 2005-06-30 | Terminated | ||
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of LymphoStat-B™ Antibody (Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody) in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT00071487] | Phase 2 | 449 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-10-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 1b Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity of Multiple Ascending Subcutaneous Doses of Efavaleukin Alfa in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythem[NCT03451422] | Phase 1 | 35 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-10 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of A 623 Administration in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT01162681] | Phase 2 | 547 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single IV Dose of MEDI-545, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against Interferon Alpha Subtypes, in Patients With Systemic Lup[NCT00299819] | Phase 1 | 45 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-03-31 | Completed | ||
Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of TAB08 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Not Adequately Controlled With Current Concomitant Therapy[NCT02711813] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-03-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Administrative reasons) | ||
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986165 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT03252587] | Phase 2 | 363 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-09-21 | Completed | ||
Potential Effect of Anti-infection by Low-dose IL-2 in Treatment of SLE[NCT02932137] | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-05-05 | Completed | |||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Ustekinumab in Chinese Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT04060888] | Phase 3 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-07-14 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Pre-planned IA (global study) showed lack of efficacy in this indication. No new safety signals observed, findings consistent with known profile.) | ||
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Azathioprine for the Induction and Maintenance of Remission of the Extra-renal Lupus Manifestations[NCT01112215] | Phase 4 | 240 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-range Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ALX-0061 Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02437890] | Phase 2 | 312 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Persistently Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Despite Moderate Dose Corticosteroids[NCT02953821] | Phase 4 | 172 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-12-16 | Completed | ||
Clarification of Abatacept Effects in SLE With Integrated Biologic and Clinical Approaches (The ABC Study)[NCT02270957] | Phase 2 | 66 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase1/2, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of One 12 Week Treatment Cycle of Epratuzumab in Japanese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Subjects With Moderate to Severe Di[NCT01449071] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 20 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-10-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2b, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sifalimumab in Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT01283139] | Phase 2 | 834 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-03-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lulizumab Pegol vs. Placebo on a Background of Limited Standard of Care in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosu[NCT02265744] | Phase 2 | 730 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-11-13 | Completed | ||
A Phase IIb Multi-Center, Open-label, Follow-up Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Epratuzumab in Serologically-positive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With Active Disease Who Participated in Study SL0007[NCT00660881] | Phase 2 | 210 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-05-31 | Completed | ||
Using the Cholinergic Anit-Inflammatory Pathway to Treat Systemic Lupus Musculoskeletal Pain[NCT02822989] | 18 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2017-11-01 | Enrolling by invitation | |||
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Neutralization of the Interferon Gene Signature and the Clinical Efficacy of IFNα-Kinoid in Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02665364] | Phase 2 | 185 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-09-23 | Terminated (stopped due to Reorganization proceedings of the sponsor) | ||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous LY2127399 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT01205438] | Phase 3 | 1,124 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2b Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rozibafusp Alfa (AMG 570) in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) With Inadequate Response to Standard of Care (SOC) Therapy[NCT04058028] | Phase 2 | 244 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-02-19 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Blisibimod Administration in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With or Without Nephritis[NCT02514967] | Phase 3 | 3 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Terminated (stopped due to Study halted prematurely and will not resume. Subjects were seen until February 2017) | ||
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 104-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Administered in Combination With Rituximab to Adult Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT03312907] | Phase 3 | 292 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-03-01 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2a, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of RSLV-132 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT02660944] | Phase 2 | 64 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-01-03 | Completed | ||
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of M2951 in Subjects With SLE[NCT02975336] | Phase 2 | 469 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-01-04 | Terminated (stopped due to Study is completed; primary analysis completed.) | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Twice-daily Application of Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g for 6 Weeks in Subjects With Active Discoid Lupus Erythematosus.[NCT03958955] | Phase 2 | 27 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-07-09 | Terminated (stopped due to Terminated due to recruitment challenges.) | ||
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006) Administered Subcutaneously (SC) to Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT01484496] | Phase 3 | 839 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-11-16 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study of Baricitinib in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT03616964] | Phase 3 | 778 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-08-02 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Blisibimod Administration in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With or Without Nephritis[NCT02074020] | Phase 3 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-12-31 | Withdrawn | ||
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02446912] | Phase 3 | 460 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-09 | Completed | ||
Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) With N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (SNAC)[NCT00775476] | Phase 2 | 290 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-03-31 | Recruiting | ||
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02446899] | Phase 3 | 373 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-07-09 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel- Group, Phase 2 Study of Baricitinib in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)[NCT02708095] | Phase 2 | 314 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-03-24 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Ustekinumab in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT03517722] | Phase 3 | 516 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-16 | Terminated (stopped due to Study terminated early as a result of the outcome of the pre-planned Interim Analysis) | ||
A Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Elsubrutinib and Upadacitinib Given Alone or in Combination (ABBV-599 Combination) in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT03978520] | Phase 2 | 341 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-07-25 | Completed | ||
A 2-Part Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of BIIB059 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Active Skin Manifestations and in Subjects With Active Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus With o[NCT02847598] | Phase 2 | 264 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-10-20 | Completed | ||
A Phase IIb Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose and Dose Regimen-ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Epratuzumab in Serologically-positive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients With Active Disease[NCT00624351] | Phase 2 | 227 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-Center Study of Epratuzumab in Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.[NCT00383214] | Phase 3 | 54 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-05-31 | Terminated | ||
A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Repeated Dose, Multicentre Phase IIa Proof-of-Concept Study With BT063 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02554019] | Phase 2 | 36 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-09-28 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of Ustekinumab in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02349061] | Phase 2 | 102 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-15 | Completed | ||
A Multi-center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Belimumab, a Human Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody, Plus Standard Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT01649765] | Phase 2 | 93 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-07 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Pilot, Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenetics of CC-220 In Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02185040] | Phase 2 | 42 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-09-16 | Completed | ||
A Two-part Study Exploring the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Acthar in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients With a History of Persistently Active Disease[NCT01753401] | Phase 4 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-01-31 | Completed | ||
GSK1550188 A 52 Week Study of Belimumab Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Located in Northeast Asia[NCT01345253] | Phase 3 | 709 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-05-23 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double Blind, Baseline Controlled Study Using Placebo as Reference for Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus in the Presence of Active L[NCT01551069] | Phase 3 | 103 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-03-31 | Completed | ||
Dipyridamole Assessment for Flare Reduction in SLE[NCT01781611] | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-28 | Terminated (stopped due to Slow recruitment) | |||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study of Baricitinib in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT03616912] | Phase 3 | 830 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-08-02 | Terminated (stopped due to Study terminated due to insufficient evidence to support a positive benefit: risk profile in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.) | ||
A Phase II Pilot-Study With Low-dose hrIL-2 for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT02465580] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2015-06-30 | Recruiting | ||
A PHASE 2B, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RANGING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF PF-06700841 IN PARTICIPANTS WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE)[NCT03845517] | Phase 2 | 350 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-04-18 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus[NCT01438489] | Phase 2 | 626 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-01-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Percentage of patients who achieved at least a 50% decrease from baseline in the total combined Erythema and Scaling score of all treated lesions at Week 4. A decrease is an improvement in measurement of erythema and scaling of the lesions. (NCT01597050)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4
Intervention | percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|---|
Drug: R932333 | 22.2 |
Placebo | 27.8 |
"The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means not at all, and 4 means very much. The total FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52. Note: Data presented is Adjusted mean data." (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 3.8 |
0.15 mg QD | 2.7 |
0.30 mg QD | 3.1 |
0.45 mg QD | 5.2 |
The PGA uses a visual analog scale with scores between 0 and 3 to indicate worsening of disease. The scoring is as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | -0.803 |
0.15 mg QD | -0.805 |
0.30 mg QD | -0.819 |
0.45 mg QD | -0.883 |
"Joint tenderness and swelling will be noted as present or absent, with no quantitation of severity using a 28- joint count. Note: Data presented is Adjusted mean data." (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | swollen joints (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | -6.7 |
0.15 mg QD | -6.0 |
0.30 mg QD | -6.0 |
0.45 mg QD | -6.6 |
"Joint tenderness and swelling will be noted as present or absent, with no quantitation of severity using a 28- joint count. Note: Data presented is Adjusted mean data." (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | tender joints (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | -7.9 |
0.15 mg QD | -6.8 |
0.30 mg QD | -6.7 |
0.45 mg QD | -7.6 |
The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of three doses of CC-220 (0.45 mg once per day [QD], 0.3 mg QD or 0.15 mg QD) compared to placebo, for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using the SLE Responder Index at Week 24 Composite endpoint SRI(4), defined by the following criteria: - Reduction from Baseline of ≥ 4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) 2K score and - No new one or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or new (excludes A to B) 2 or more BILAG B items compared to Baseline using BILAG 2004 Index and - No worsening from Baseline defined by an increase of < 0.30 points from Baseline on a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-3 (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Number of participants (Number) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 29 |
0.15 mg QD | 20 |
0.30 mg QD | 33 |
0.45 mg QD | 44 |
The CLASI Activity Score ranges from 0 to 70. To generate the activity score erythema is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/hemorrhagic) and scale/hypertrophy are scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous/hypertrophic). Both the erythema and scale/hypertrophy scores are assessed in 13 different anatomical locations. In addition, the presence of mucous membrane lesions is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 1 (lesion or ulceration), the occurrence of recent hair loss is captured (1=yes; 0=no) and non-scarring alopecia is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (focal or patchy in more than one quadrant). To calculate the activity score, all scores for erythema, scale/hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions and alopecia are added together. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Number of participants (Number) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 8 |
0.15 mg QD | 8 |
0.30 mg QD | 8 |
0.45 mg QD | 13 |
The BILAG 2004 is a composite index that is based on the Classic BILAG index. It is a clinical measure of lupus disease activity. This tool assesses the changing severity of clinical manifestations of SLE using an ordinal scale scoring system that contain 9 systems (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal and hematological). Activity in each organ system is scored as: A=most active disease; B=intermediate activity; C=mild, stable disease; D=previous involvement, currently inactive; E=no previous activity. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Number of participants (Number) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 65 |
0.15 mg QD | 38 |
0.30 mg QD | 59 |
0.45 mg QD | 70 |
The SLEDAI 2K score measures disease activity through assessment of 24 lupus manifestations using a weighted score of 1 to 8 points. A manifestation is recorded if it is present over the previous 30 days regardless of severity or whether it has improved or worsened. A SLEDAI 2K score of 3 to 4 points is representative of active disease and a decrease of 1 to 2 points is considered clinically meaningful. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Number of participants (Number) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 30 |
0.15 mg QD | 20 |
0.30 mg QD | 35 |
0.45 mg QD | 45 |
Percent change from Baseline in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose in subjects with prednisone or equivalent ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline Note: Data presented is Adjusted mean data. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percent change from baseline (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | -7.9 |
0.15 mg QD | -5.1 |
0.30 mg QD | -3.8 |
0.45 mg QD | -1.4 |
The PGA uses a visual analog scale with scores between 0 and 3 to indicate worsening of disease. The scoring is as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, and 3 = severe disease. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 78.3 |
0.15 mg QD | 90.5 |
0.30 mg QD | 73.2 |
0.45 mg QD | 85.2 |
Standardized total oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose. (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Through Week 24
Intervention | mg (Mean) |
---|---|
PBO QD | 1139.7 |
0.15 mg QD | 1101.9 |
0.30 mg QD | 1071.8 |
0.45 mg QD | 1105.5 |
Number of participants who experienced a TEAE during the course of the study (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: from first dose to 28 days post-last dose through Week 24 (placebo-controlled phase), approximately 28 weeks total
Intervention | Number of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Any Drug-related TEAE | Any Serious TEAE | Any Severe TEAE | Any TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption | Any TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal | Any TEAE Leading to Death | |
0.15 mg QD | 31 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
0.30 mg QD | 64 | 36 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 0 |
0.45 mg QD | 63 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 23 | 4 | 0 |
PBO QD | 54 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 15 | 6 | 1 |
- The percentage of participants with a prednisone or equivalent dose of ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline whose prednisone or equivalent dose has been reduced to ≤ 7.5 mg/day by Week 16 and maintained through Week 24 with no flares between Week 16 and Week 24 - The percentage of participants with a prednisone or equivalent dose of ≥ 10 mg/day at Baseline whose prednisone or equivalent dose has been reduced to < 10 mg/day by Week 16 and maintained through Week 24 with no flares between Week 16 and Week 24 (NCT03161483)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24, <= 7.5 mg/day | Week 24, < 10 mg/day | |
0.15 mg QD | 0.0 | 0.0 |
0.30 mg QD | 3.3 | 3.3 |
0.45 mg QD | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PBO QD | 3.2 | 6.5 |
The BILAG index is a clinical measure of lupus disease activity. BILAG uses a single score for each of the 8 organ domains; range is from severe to no disease (A to E). The global BILAG score is the sum of the numerical scores in the 8 domains assigning A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0.The normalized AUC was created as the ratio of the area under the global BILAG score curve divided by baseline score. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 4 to 8 weeks through Week 52
Intervention | ratio score*days (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | 315.4 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 310.6 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 300.4 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 302.7 |
SELENA SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105; scores > 20 are rare. The normalized AUC was created as the ratio of the area under the SELENA SLEDAI score curve divided by baseline score. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 4 to 8 weeks through Week 52
Intervention | ratio score*days (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | 317.3 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 288.7 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 320.3 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 286.9 |
The BILAG index is a clinical measure of lupus disease activity. BILAG uses a single score for each of the 8 organ domains; range is from severe to no disease (A to E). The global BILAG score is the sum of the numerical scores in the 8 domains assigning A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | -19.1 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | -20.8 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | -26.5 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | -22.0 |
SELENA SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105; scores > 20 are rare. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | -17.2 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | -23.3 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | -11.3 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | -23.7 |
SELENA SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105; scores > 20 are rare (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | -20.6 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | -29.7 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | -23.9 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | -27.9 |
Percentage of patients whose average prednisone dose has been reduced by ≥ 50% and/or has been reduced to ≤ 7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40 through 52 in patients receiving greater than 7.5 mg/day at baseline. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 40 to 52
Intervention | percentatge of particpants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | 27.1 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 20.0 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 31.4 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 44.7 |
"The SLE Flare Index categorized SLE flare as mild or moderate or severe based on 5 variables: 1) change in SELENA SLEDAI score from the most recent assessment to current, 2) change in signs or symptoms of disease activity, 3) change in prednisone dosage, 4) use of new medications for disease activity or hospitalization, and 5) change in Physician's Global Assessment score, a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 3 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe)." (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: 0 to 52 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | 83 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 68 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 61 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 70 |
SLE flare indicates an increase in SLE disease activity. An SLE flare was a type A or B SLE flare (as defined using BILAG) compared with the previous visit. (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: 0 to 52 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus SOC | 78 |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 63 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 84 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 62 |
Includes AEs reported in patients from the first dose of study agent throughout the study up to the Week 76/exit visit or 8 weeks following the last dose of study agent for patients who withdrew from this study or decided not to participate in the optional continuation protocol (LBSL99/NCT00583362). (NCT00071487)
Timeframe: Up to 84 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Percent of patients with at least 1 AE | Percent of patients with at least 1 SAE | Percent of patients with an AE resulting in death | |
Belimumab 1 mg/kg Plus SOC | 97.4 | 18.4 | 0.9 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg Plus SOC | 97.3 | 16.2 | 0.9 |
Belimumab 4 mg/kg Plus SOC | 96.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
Open-Label Extension Period: All Active | 96.2 | 9.6 | 0 |
Placebo Plus SOC | 97.3 | 19.5 | 0 |
A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) starting on or after the first dose of investigational product through to the safety follow-up visit. Any clinically significant changes in physical examinations, vital signs, and clinical laboratory test results were recorded as AEs. (NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of study, maximum of 18 weeks (12-week double-blind treatment, 6-week safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7 |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 5 |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 5 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 7 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 3 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 4 |
(NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, Day 85 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 92, 99, 113 and 127
Intervention | hour*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
First dose (Day 1) | Last dose (Day 85) | |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 538 | 773 |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 915 | 1120 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 1560 | 542 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 1960 | 3260 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 3770 | 3010 |
(NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, Day 85 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 92, 99, 113 and 127
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
First dose (Day 1) | Last dose (Day 85) | |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 7.92 | 9.24 |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 13.0 | 18.9 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 25.7 | 10.0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 30.7 | 56.5 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 44.3 | 51.6 |
Number of participants who tested positive for developing anti-AMG 592 or anti-IL-2 binding antibodies at 1 or more post-baseline time points, with a negative or no result at baseline, are reported. (NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of study, maximum of 18 weeks (12-week double-blind treatment, 6-week safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Binding anti-AMG 592 antibody | |
Placebo | 0 |
Number of participants who tested positive for developing anti-AMG 592 or anti-IL-2 binding antibodies at 1 or more post-baseline time points, with a negative or no result at baseline, are reported. (NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of study, maximum of 18 weeks (12-week double-blind treatment, 6-week safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Binding anti-AMG 592 antibody | Binding anti-IL-2 antibody | |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 3 | 2 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 6 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 2 | 1 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 4 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 3 | 1 |
Number of participants who tested positive for developing anti-AMG 592 or anti-IL-2 neutralizing antibodies at 1 or more post-baseline time points, with a negative or no result at baseline, are reported. (NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of study, maximum of 18 weeks (12-week double-blind treatment, 6-week safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Neutralizing anti-AMG 592 antibody | |
Placebo | 0 |
Number of participants who tested positive for developing anti-AMG 592 or anti-IL-2 neutralizing antibodies at 1 or more post-baseline time points, with a negative or no result at baseline, are reported. (NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of study, maximum of 18 weeks (12-week double-blind treatment, 6-week safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Neutralizing anti-AMG 592 antibody | Neutralizing anti-IL-2 antibody | |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 0 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 2 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 1 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 0 | 0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 2 | 0 |
(NCT03451422)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, Day 85 (pre-dose) and 6 to 72 hours post-dose, and Days 92, 99, 113 and 127
Intervention | hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
First dose (Day 1) | Last dose (Day 85) | |
AMG 592 Cohort 1 | 24.0 | 25.2 |
AMG 592 Cohort 2 | 47.6 | 26.2 |
AMG 592 Cohort 3 | 24.1 | 18.0 |
AMG 592 Cohort 4 | 24.6 | 24.1 |
AMG 592 Cohort 5 | 17.8 | 16.7 |
"BICLA responder is defined as a patient whose disease course fulfills all of the following:~Improvement in all organ systems with activity graded as BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or B (moderate disease activity) at baseline~No new organ system with activity graded as BILAG A; no more than 1 new organ system with activity graded as BILAG B~No increase from baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus SLEDAI-2K score (≤ 0 points for change from baseline score)~No increase ≥ 10% in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on a 3-point visual analog scale from no disease activity to severe disease activity~No discontinuation of investigational product or use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 23 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 43 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 33 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 32 |
"LLDAS is defined as follows:~SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity measured as maintaining a D (no disease activity but suggests the system had previously been affected) or E (no current or previous disease activity) score in BILAG Gastrointestinal Body System~No new lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment measured as no new or worsening individual BILAG parameters~Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity ≤ 1 on a 3-point visual analog scale from no disease activity to severe disease activity~A current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose ≤ 7.5 mg daily~Well-tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 12 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 33 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 22 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 23 |
"SRI(4) responder is defined as a patient whose disease course fulfills all of the following:~A 4-point or greater reduction from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score~No new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease activity) and not more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) organ domain grade~No worsening from baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale by more than 0.3 points on a 3-point visual analog scale from no disease activity to severe disease activity" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At week 32
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 31 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 53 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 46 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 40 |
"SRI(4) responder is defined as a patient whose disease course fulfills all of the following:~A 4-point or greater reduction from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score~No new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease activity) or not more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) organ domain grade~No worsening from baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale by more than 0.3 points on a 3-point visual analog scale from no disease activity to severe disease activity" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 31 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 52 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 44 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 42 |
Number of participants with a Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score ≥ 10 at baseline who achieve a CLASI response, defined as a decrease of ≥ 50% from baseline CLASI activity score (ranges from 0-70, where a higher score is associated with high disease activity). CLASI assesses by body surface area; points are given for presence of erythema, scale, hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and physician-observed alopecia (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 16 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 14 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 18 |
Percent change from baseline in anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) levels. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 52
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 276.26 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 16.51 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | -31.79 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | -19.32 |
Percent change from baseline in anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) levels. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 32
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 21.36 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | -15.24 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | -11.31 |
BMS-986165 12 mg | -24.17 |
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for the following treatments: BMS-986165 and its active metabolite BMT-153261. Geometric coefficient of variation was not calculated and the arithmetic coefficient of variation (% CV) is being reported. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 hours post dose on week 12
Intervention | NG/ML (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
BMS-986165 | Metabolite BMT-153261 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 96.249 | 11.748 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 38.033 | 6.358 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 76.400 | 12.133 |
Time of maximum observed plasma concentration (Tmax) for the following treatments: BMS-986165 and its active metabolite BMT-153261. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 10 hours post dose on week 12
Intervention | Hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
BMS-986165 | Metabolite BMT-153261 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 2.0000 | 3.7330 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 2.0000 | 4.0000 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 2.0000 | 4.0000 |
Trough observed plasma concentration (Ctrough) for the following treatments: BMS-986165 and its active metabolite BMT-153261. Geometric coefficient of variation was not calculated and the arithmetic coefficient of variation (% CV) is being reported. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 hours post dose on week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48
Intervention | NG/ML (Geometric Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMS-986165 week 2 | BMS-986165 week 4 | BMS-986165 week 8 | BMS-986165 week 12 | BMS-986165 week 24 | BMS-986165 week 32 | BMS-986165 week 48 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 2 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 4 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 8 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 12 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 24 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 32 | Metabolite BMT-153261 week 48 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 30.8135 | 20.1182 | 26.7961 | 22.1237 | 21.8720 | 24.5060 | 15.9576 | 8.7920 | 7.2703 | 8.1451 | 7.4071 | 6.6608 | 6.8734 | 5.8602 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 14.3737 | 14.6095 | 13.0328 | 10.7517 | 10.2546 | 8.5293 | 6.8493 | 4.2667 | 5.0886 | 4.1293 | 3.7325 | 3.3669 | 2.9759 | 2.8708 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 29.2909 | 22.9170 | 12.9587 | 28.7751 | 13.9273 | 15.5285 | 21.7890 | 8.4841 | 7.7803 | 5.2290 | 9.3281 | 5.2229 | 5.2925 | 6.8838 |
"Change from baseline in the following 40-joint count: phalangeal joints of the hand, second through fifth metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand, and individual metatarsophalangeal joints of the feet, Bilateral first metacarpophalangeal joints and shoulders. Each of 40 joints count is evaluated based upon the presence or absence of:~Tender joint count (0 to 40)~Swollen joint count (0 to 40)~Tender and swollen joint count (0 to 40) A larger joint count indicates more severe disease." (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 48
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Tender | Swollen | Tender + Swollen | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | -12.3 | -9.9 | -9.7 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | -12.2 | -8.5 | -8.2 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | -11.7 | -8.8 | -8.5 |
Placebo | -11.2 | -8.3 | -8.2 |
Number of participants with abnormalities in electrocardiograms (ECGs) assessed by QTcF, PR interval, and QRS interval (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to up to week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline: QTcF 450 to < 480 | Baseline: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Baseline: QTcF >= 500 | Baseline: PR Interval >= 200 | Baseline: QRS Interval >=200 | Week 4: QTcF 450 to < 480 | Week 4: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Week4: QTcF >= 500 | Week 4: PR Interval >= 200 | Week 4: QRS Interval: >= 200 | Week 8: QTcF 450 to < 480 | Week 8: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Week 8: QTcF >=500 | Week 8: PR Interval >= 200 | Week 8 QRS Interval >=200 | Week 12: QTcF 450 to < 480 | Week 12: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Week 12: QTcF >= 500 | Week 12: PR Interval >= 200 | Week 12: QRS Interval >=200 | Week 32: QTcF 450 to < 480 | Week 32: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Week 32: QTcF >=500 | Week 32: PR Interval >= 200 | Week 32: QRS Interval >= 200 | Week 48: QTcF: 450 to < 480 | Week 48: QTcF 480 to < 500 | Week 48: QTcF >=500 | Week 48: PR Interval: >= 200 | Week 48: QRS Interval: >= 200 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Placebo | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Number of participants with abnormalities in vital signs including heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (Up to 52 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 2: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 2: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 2: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 2: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 2: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 4: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 4: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 4: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 4: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 4: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 4: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 8: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 8: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 8: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 8: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 8: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 8: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 12: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 12: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 12: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 12: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 12: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 12: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 16: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 16: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 16: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 16: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 16: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 16: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 20: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 20: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 20: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 20: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 20: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 20: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 24: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 24: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 24: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 24: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 24: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 24: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 28: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 28: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 28: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 28: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 28: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 28: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 32: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 32: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 32: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 32: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 32: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 32: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 36: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 36: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 36: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 36: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 36: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 36: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 40: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 40: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 40: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 40: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 40: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 40: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 44: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 44: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 44: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 44: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 44: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 44: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 48: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 48: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 48: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 48: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 48: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 48: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | Week 52: Heart Rate: Value > 100 and change from baseline > 30 | Week 52: Heart Rate: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -15 | Week 52: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value > 140 and change from baseline > 20 | Week 52: Systolic Blood Pressure: Value < 90 and change from baseline < -20 | Week 52: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value > 90 and change from baseline > 10 | Week 52: Diastolic Blood Pressure: Value < 55 and change from baseline < -10 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of participants with any grade adverse events (AEs) and any grade serious adverse events (SAEs). An adverse event (AE) including SAEs is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants that do not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (Up to 52 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 75 | 7 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 85 | 7 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 81 | 8 |
Placebo | 79 | 11 |
"Global systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical response in participants based on interferon-regulated gene (IRG) status (high versus low IRG signature). IRG-high vs. IRG-low was determined using a 5-interferon (IFN) gene set during the sample collected at screening period. SRI(4) responder is defined as a patient whose disease course fulfills all of the following:~A 4-point or greater reduction from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score~No new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease activity) or not more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) organ domain grade~No worsening from baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Scale by more than 0.3 points on a 3-point visual analog scale from no disease activity to severe disease activity" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: At week 32
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
IFN Low | IFN High | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 5 | 35 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 7 | 46 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 11 | 35 |
Placebo | 10 | 21 |
"Number of participants with laboratory abnormalities in specific liver tests based on US conventional units. The potential drug-induced liver injury is defined by the presence of all of the following:~Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) elevation > 3× Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)~Total bilirubin > 2× ULN, without initial findings of cholestasis (elevated serum alkaline phosphatase)~No other immediately apparent possible causes of AST or AST elevation and hyperbilirubinemia, including, but not limited to, viral hepatitis, preexisting chronic or acute liver disease, or the administration of other drug(s) known to be hepatotoxic" (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (Up to 52 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
ALT or AST > 3XULN | ALT or AST > 5XULN | Total Bilirubin > 2XULN | ALT or AST > 3XULN and Total Bilirubin > 2XULN on the same day | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Percent change from baseline in complement proteins C3 and C4 levels. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 32
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
C3 | C4 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 10.84 | 25.13 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 5.78 | 12.32 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 12.42 | 16.71 |
Placebo | -0.58 | -3.27 |
Percent change from baseline in complement proteins C3 and C4 levels. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 52
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
C3 | C4 | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | 14.74 | 20.43 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | 5.33 | 3.57 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | 7.60 | 24.96 |
Placebo | 3.57 | 84.52 |
Percent change from baseline in interferon-regulated gene (IRG) expression levels. IRG-high vs. IRG-low was determined using a 5-interferon (IFN) gene set during the sample collected at screening period. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 44
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
IFN High | IFN Low | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | -47.5561 | -41.7645 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | -39.7478 | -18.0641 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | -55.5691 | -36.4510 |
Placebo | -0.8130 | 4.7381 |
Percent change from baseline in interferon-regulated gene (IRG) expression levels. IRG-high vs. IRG-low was determined using a 5-interferon (IFN) gene set during the sample collected at screening period. Baseline values are defined as the last measurement before the first dose. (NCT03252587)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 32
Intervention | Percent Change from Baseline (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
IFN High | IFN Low | |
BMS-986165 12 mg | -61.0515 | -42.9701 |
BMS-986165 3 mg | -40.7944 | -27.4897 |
BMS-986165 6 mg | -54.6988 | -42.8107 |
Placebo | -4.3993 | -2.6555 |
"The primary endpoint was evaluated by determining if there was a dose-response relationship between the mBICLA response rate at Week 24 and the dose administered, using the Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod) methodology. The existence of several candidate parametric models was assumed and multiple comparison techniques were used to choose the model(s) most likely to represent the true underlying dose-response curve. The selected model could further be used to guide the choice of adequate doses.~mBICLA responders were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria:~BILAG-2004 normal improvement: all A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D, and all B scores improved to C or D.~No worsening in disease activity: no new BILAG-2004 A scores and ≤ 1 new increase to B.~No worsening of total mSLEDAI-2K score from Baseline.~No significant deterioration (< 10% worsening from Baseline) in PGA.~No treatment failure (including the premature" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 visit
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 29 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 28 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 24 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 24 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 23 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: From first administration of ALX-0061 up to and including follow-up
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 32 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 16 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 18 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 31 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 38 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | unit(s) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 103.0 | 56.7 | 68.4 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 98.9 | 73.6 | 73.5 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 82.4 | 41.1 | 41.9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 109.6 | 107.0 | 113.1 |
Placebo | 101.1 | 95.8 | 102.2 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | IU/mL (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 68.92 | 14.98 | 9.13 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 52.88 | 46.99 | 74.21 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 73.34 | 23.25 | 15.53 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 145.87 | 68.27 | 59.48 |
Placebo | 132.90 | 81.36 | 81.80 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | nmol/L (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 66.32 | 3.83 | 4.41 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 38.89 | 26.08 | 23.20 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 32.23 | 3.20 | 4.02 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 49.05 | 47.22 | 37.65 |
Placebo | 43.58 | 59.43 | 30.70 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 105.8 | 75.3 | 83.2 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 101.9 | 82.0 | 79.0 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 98.6 | 71.8 | 72.3 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 100.2 | 95.7 | 93.2 |
Placebo | 102.3 | 101.7 | 95.8 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 18.7 | 8.7 | 9.8 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 15.9 | 10.6 | 10.5 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 16.3 | 7.9 | 8.1 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 17.8 | 17.4 | 17.3 |
Placebo | 17.3 | 17.5 | 16.3 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 3.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 3.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Placebo | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24, and Week 48
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 42.14 | 668.57 | 650.73 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 38.10 | 603.51 | 610.86 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 36.92 | 634.49 | 659.79 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 37.63 | 198.26 | 224.66 |
Placebo | 42.22 | 39.70 | 39.41 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | µg/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 18.1 | 17.9 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 2.05 | 2.17 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 30.7 | 36.1 |
ALX-0061 75 mg 4qw | 0.118 | 0.155 |
"The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) is a comprehensive composite clinical index that has been developed based on the principle of a physician's intention to treat using a nominal consensus approach. In the index, the nine systems (not organs) considered are: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, ophthalmic and hematological. Disease activity in each of the nine systems is categorized into five levels: grades A (= severe disease activity requiring systemic high dose oral corticosteroids, i.v. pulse corticosteroids, etc.) to E (= system never involved).~BILAG total score is derived by assigning the following value to each grade and summing the sores over all organ systems:~A = 12, B = 8, C = 1, D/E = 0. The total score ranges from 0-108, with 108 representing high disease activity in all 9 systems requiring high doses of corticosteroids, starting/increasing immunosuppressive drugs, etc." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 17.4 | 7.2 | 6.0 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 15.2 | 7.0 | 5.2 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 17.3 | 7.4 | 6.2 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 17.9 | 5.7 | 4.0 |
Placebo | 17.4 | 6.8 | 6.0 |
Twenty-eight joints are assessed for swollenness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of swollenness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are swollen). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -4.8 | -5.1 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -4.9 | -4.7 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -4.5 | -4.5 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -5.0 | -5.4 |
Placebo | -4.8 | -5.0 |
Twenty-eight joints are assessed for tenderness (a score of 1 for a joint denotes a presence of tenderness). The sum is derived to create a total score (ranging from 0 to 28; where the highest score indicate all 28 joints are tender). Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline TJC28 Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change denotes and improvement. (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -5.8 | -6.6 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -6.4 | -6.4 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -5.5 | -6.5 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -6.8 | -7.4 |
Placebo | -6.8 | -6.6 |
"CLASI Damage is scored based on dyspigmentation and scarring. Evaluation of dyspigmentation and scarring is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (dyspigmentation: 0=absent, 1=present; scarring: 0=absent, 1=scarring, 2=severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis). Subjects are also asked whether dyspigmentation due to SLE lesions usually remains visible for >12 months, which is considered permanent and results in doubling of the dyspigmentation score. Scarring alopecia is scored as follows: 0=absent, 3=1 quadrant, 4=2 quadrants, 5=3 quadrants, 6=affects the whole skull. Total score ranges from 0-56, with higher scores indicating more damaged skin.~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Damage Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -0.1 | -0.4 | -0.3 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -0.4 | -0.1 | -0.7 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 0.1 | -0.4 | -0.1 |
Placebo | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline eGFR and geographic region as covariates (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -0.90 | -1.47 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -1.72 | 4.66 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -8.91 | -8.08 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 4.83 | 2.47 |
Placebo | -1.63 | -6.00 |
"CLASI Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and nonscarring alopecia. Evaluation of erythema and scale/hyperkeratosis is based on a table: rows represent anatomical areas and columns represent major clinical symptoms. The extent of involvement for each of the skin symptoms is documented for each anatomic area (erythema: 0=absent, 1=pink, 2=red, 3=dark red; scale: 0=absent, 1=scale, 2=verrucous/hypertrophic). Mucous membrane involvement and acute hair loss are scored based on the presence (=1) or absence (=0).~Nonscarring alopecia is scored as 0=absent, 1=diffuse/non-inflammatory, 2=focal or patchy in 1 quadrant, 3=focal or patchy in >1 quadrant. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline CLASI Activity Score and geographic region as covariates. Negative change = improvement" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -1.6 | -1.3 | -2.1 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -1.4 | -1.6 | -2.5 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -1.3 | -1.8 | -3.0 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -1.9 | -2.1 | -3.0 |
Placebo | -2.4 | -1.1 | -1.3 |
"The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 0.45 | -1.07 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -0.56 | -0.07 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -1.18 | -2.02 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -0.99 | -0.58 |
Placebo | 0.08 | 1.50 |
The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 is a 1-page weighted score for 24 items (seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, visual disturbance, cranial nerve disorder, lupus headache, cerebrovascular accident, vasculitis, arthritis, myositis, urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers, pleurisy, pericarditis, low complement, etc). The manifestations felt to be most commonly contributing to disease activity are included and scored based on the presence (= 1 multiplied by weight) or absence (= 0) within 30 days prior to the evaluation. The total score ranges from 0-105 (= sum of individual scores), with 105 being higher disease activity. mSLEDAI-2K derives from the standard index by omitting low complement. Mean changes from baseline were derived from an ANCOVA model with treatment as factor and baseline mSLEDAI-2K Score and geographic region as covariates. A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement. (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -4.3 | -4.9 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -3.8 | -4.3 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -3.6 | -4.9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -4.6 | -5.2 |
Placebo | -4.0 | -4.5 |
"The subject makes a mark between 0 (very good) and 100 mm (very bad) on the VAS to indicate how the subject is doing, while considering all the ways SLE affects him/her.~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline Patient's Global Assessment and geographic region as covariates.~A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -20.1 | -27.2 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -14.9 | -22.1 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -16.0 | -25.9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -13.5 | -21.5 |
Placebo | -12.4 | -15.1 |
"The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) consists of 36 items that can be summarized into 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), and mental health. Two summary measures, the physical component summary and the mental component summary, can be derived based on these domain scores. Each score is directly transformed into a 0-100 score on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline SF-36 Score and geographic region as covariates. A positive change denotes an improvement." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 4.67 | 8.62 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 6.77 | 8.67 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 5.01 | 8.85 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 4.56 | 6.97 |
Placebo | 4.71 | 3.73 |
"The physician makes a mark between 0 (no disease) and 100 mm (severe disease) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate disease activity (independent of the subject's self-assessment).~Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline PGA score and geographic region as covariates.~A negative change from baseline reflects an improvement." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -23.5 | -30.1 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -26.2 | -30.2 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -22.7 | -30.5 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -28.4 | -32.9 |
Placebo | -25.2 | -28.3 |
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline proteinuria and geographic region as covariates (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | g/mol (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -3.02 | -0.49 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 1.03 | -1.62 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 0.16 | -1.21 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 1.77 | 3.83 |
Placebo | 6.17 | 4.89 |
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline serum creatinine and geographic region as covariates (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | umol/L (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -3.98 | -4.04 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | -1.50 | -6.26 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -0.86 | -1.24 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -3.29 | -1.87 |
Placebo | -1.25 | 1.19 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline to Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 7 | 9 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 6 | 10 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 6 | 9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 6 | 6 |
Placebo | 8 | 8 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline to Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 2 | 4 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 2 | 4 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 1 | 2 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 1 | 4 |
Number and percentage of subjects who discontinued Prednisone (or equivalent) by Week 48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: Up to and including Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
BILAG-2004-defined Flare | mSFI-defined Flare | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 1 | 1 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 1 | 2 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 0 | 0 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 |
Number and percentage of subjects whose prednisone equivalent dose was >7.5 mg/day at baseline and reduced to ≤7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40-48 without experiencing a BILAG-2004-defined or mSFI-defined severe flare after the first prednisone equivalent dose decrease. (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: Between Week 40 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
BILAG-2004-defined Flare | mSFI-defined Flare | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 1 | 1 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 5 | 4 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 3 | 4 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 2 | 2 |
Placebo | 3 | 3 |
Enhanced improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D and no worsening between consecutive visits from baseline up to the considered visit Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 6 | 6 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 11 | 7 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 13 | 7 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 16 | 10 |
Placebo | 7 | 5 |
"Normal Improvement: all A scores at baseline improved to B/C/D, and all B scores improved to C or D.~Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 25 | 22 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 28 | 29 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 24 | 25 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 29 | 34 |
Placebo | 31 | 34 |
"An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.~Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 21 | 18 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 18 | 18 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 25 | 22 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 24 | 27 |
Placebo | 25 | 26 |
"An improvement is defined as an A score at Baseline improved to B/C/D, or a B score improved to C or D.~Only subjects with non-missing BILAG-2004 who had at least one A or B score at Baseline were assessed for this endpoint" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 36 | 33 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 36 | 35 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 33 | 31 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 39 | 38 |
Placebo | 41 | 40 |
Number and percentage of mBICLA responders at Week 24 and Week 48 (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 24 | 19 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 22 | 22 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 22 | 22 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 28 | 32 |
Placebo | 28 | 28 |
"The composite index mSRI-4 enables quantification of decrease and increase in disease activity in a broad spectrum of manifestations thereby offering a comprehensive assessment of SLE disease status. mSRI combines advantages from 3 validated measurement tools. The mSRI-4 criteria for response are:~modified SLE disease activity index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K): ≥ 4 point reduction (covers global disease improvement),~British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004): no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B (covers organ-specific disease improvement),~Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (is used as validity and safety net for items that were not addressed by the other two indices): < 10% increase from Baseline (no worsening) When all 3 criteria are met, the subject is a mSRI-4 responder at that time point.~Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 33 | 26 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 30 | 29 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 29 | 33 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 39 | 36 |
Placebo | 37 | 34 |
"The mSRI-5 criteria for response are:~mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 5 point reduction~BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score~PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 5 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.~Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 20 | 16 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 19 | 18 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 16 | 22 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 24 | 28 |
Placebo | 17 | 20 |
"The mSRI-6 criteria for response are:~mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 6 point reduction~BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score~PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 6 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.~Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation" (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 19 | 16 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 19 | 16 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 15 | 22 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 23 | 28 |
Placebo | 16 | 20 |
"The mSRI-7 criteria for response are:~mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 7 point reduction~BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score~PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 7 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.~Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 12 | 8 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 8 | 7 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 7 | 9 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 8 | 14 |
Placebo | 9 | 12 |
"The mSRI-8 criteria for response are:~mSLEDAI-2K: ≥ 8 point reduction~BILAG-2004: no new A domain score and no more than 1 new increase to B domain score~PGA: no worsening (< 10% increase from Baseline) Only subjects with Baseline mSLEDAI-2K ≥ 8 were considered for the derivation of that endpoint.~Subjects who were treatment failures or discontinued from treatment were considered non-responder after treatment failure/discontinuation." (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 10 | 7 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 8 | 7 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 7 | 8 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 7 | 14 |
Placebo | 9 | 11 |
(NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 16 | 16 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 19 | 23 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 16 | 19 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 24 | 27 |
Placebo | 15 | 20 |
Defined as non-protocol allowed increase in steroid dose, start i.v. or i.m. steroids, or start or increase of immunosuppressant (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline to Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 2 | 6 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 4 | 9 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 3 | 6 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 0 | 1 |
Placebo | 2 | 5 |
Efficacy Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis) - Active Urine Sediment Number of subjects who were urine sediment negative at Baseline, but positive at Week 24 and Week 48, respectively. (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | 0 | 0 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 0 | 0 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | 0 | 0 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 1 | 0 |
Mean changes from baseline were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as factor and baseline prednisone equivalent total daily dose and geographic region as covariates (NCT02437890)
Timeframe: At Week 24 and Week 48
Intervention | percentage (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 24 | Week 48 | |
ALX-0061 150 mg q2w | -1.40 | -2.32 |
ALX-0061 150 mg q4w | 0.25 | -1.03 |
ALX-0061 225 mg q2w | -3.46 | -1.73 |
ALX-0061 75 mg q4w | -0.80 | -3.22 |
Placebo | 3.87 | 6.93 |
Among some adults, having a period of SLE symptoms-called flares-may happen every so often, sometimes even years apart, and go away at other times-called remission. The SFI categorizes SLE flares as mild, moderate or severe. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 16
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo Gel | 3 |
Acthar Gel | 0 |
"BILAG records disease activity occurring over the past 4 weeks, and is used to determine whether different course of treatment is required. The BILAG-2004 index covers 97 signs/symptoms across 9 organ systems. Each question is answered as 0-not present, 1-improving, 2-same, 3-worse, or 4-new.~The BILAG-2004 index categorizes disease activity in each organ system into five different levels from A to E. Grade A represents very active disease, Grade B represents moderate disease activity, Grade C indicates mild stable disease, and grade D implies no disease activity, but suggests the organ system had previously been affected. Grade E indicates no current or previous disease activity. A score is applied to each grade of each organ system using coding scheme of A=12, B=8, C=1, and D/E=0 and is summarized as a total score ranging 0-108. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity." (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 16 | Week 24 | |
Acthar Gel | 18.0 | 7.7 | 6.9 |
Placebo Gel | 18.2 | 9.7 | 8.0 |
The CLASI total activity score reflects ongoing inflammation that can be treated, with points given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Mild, moderate, and severe disease correspond with CLASI activity score ranges of 0 to 9, 10 to 20, and 21 to 70, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity, lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Acthar Gel | 7.9 | 5.6 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.4 |
Placebo Gel | 7.1 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 3.8 |
The 28 Joint Count includes assessment of swelling and tenderness in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints and knees. The investigator counts how many of the 28 joints are swollen or tender at the given week. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: at Baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Intervention | Joints (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Acthar Gel | 8.2 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
Placebo Gel | 7.2 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
The SLEDAI-2K is a modified version of a composite score based on the presence or absence of clinical signs, clinical symptoms, and immunologic laboratory results taken within 10 days of the evaluations. Each of the descriptors has a weighted score and the total score of SLEDAI-2K is the sum of all 24 descriptor scores. The total SLEDAI-2K score falls between 0 and 105, with higher scores representing higher disease activity. Decrease from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 16, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 16 | Week 24 | |
Acthar Gel | 41 | 44 |
Placebo Gel | 40 | 46 |
(NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Week 20, Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Week 20 | Week 24 | |
Acthar Gel | 3 | 4 |
Placebo Gel | 5 | 6 |
PGA is a 100 mm visual analogue scale where higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Lower scores indicate improvement. (NCT02953821)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Week 16 | Week 24 | |
Acthar Gel | 60.6 | 30.2 | 25.5 |
Placebo Gel | 58.8 | 33.2 | 26.9 |
The SLEDAI is a discontinuous scoring system that weights disease activity not by severity of individual symptoms but by the weighting of organs. This makes it less robust for comparing one group of patients to another, but it is quite useful to gave numbers of patients with improvement, since to lower the score a rigorous improvement must be documented (NCT02270957)
Timeframe: Comparison of Baseline to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Abatacept | 9 |
Placebo | 8 |
"The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index is a scoring system for progress of disease activity over the prior month with a scoring system that rates each organ system as A or severe, B or moderate, C or mild vs no activity in the past month. To meet the BICLA endpoint requires all baseline severe features (BILAG A) improving to moderate (BILAG B), mild or resolved, and all baseline BILAG B features improving to mild or resolved without increase in any other feature on either the BILAG or a different measure called the SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index). Furthermore there must be no increase in Physician's Global Assessment or any rescue medications after the month 2 visit. Only those meeting all of these criteria meet the primary endpoint." (NCT02270957)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Abatacept | 8 |
Placebo | 8 |
Comparing the endpoint date at six months to Baseline, there must be a 4 point decreased in SLEDAI score (SLEDAI is defined as the SLE Disease Activity Index). The SLEDAI is a discontinuous scale in which each type of sign or symptom of active SLE is assigned a fixed number of points. Although the scale includes possible signs or symptoms adding up to more than 100 points it is rare for any (even very severe) patient to ever have a total score > 20. To meet the SLE Responder Index endpoint, There must also be no worsening of BILAG (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (described in the primary endpoint section) and no worsening of PGA (a visual analogue scale reflecting physicians global assessment) by more than 10% of the scale. To meet this endpoint there must also be no new or increased medication initiated after Baseline other than the steroid rescues up to Month 2. (NCT02270957)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Abatacept | 9 |
Placebo | 8 |
The 12-lead ECG data were summarized and evaluated. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings as assessed by cardiologist were recorded and reported as TEAEs. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 56
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 0 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 1 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 0 |
SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >=4 points (with increased DNA binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in BILAG-2004 (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline). (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 42.0 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 57.5 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 50.0 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 57.5 |
SRI (4) responder is defined as: 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) disease activity score of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points (with increased deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] binding item of SLEDAI-2K score based on the ANA Multi-Lyte® ANA-II Plus Test System); 2) no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening is defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale) and 3) no worsening in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) (worsening is defined as at least 1 new 'A' score or 2 new 'B' scores on the BILAG-2004 compared with baseline). (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 45.4 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 58.3 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 56.5 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 59.8 |
Laboratory investigations included hematology, serum chemistries and urinalysis parameters. Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in these laboratory investigations recorded as TEAEs were reported. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 61
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anaemia | White blood cell count increased | Neutrophil count increased | Iron deficiency anaemia | Haemoglobin decreased | Lymphocyte count decreased | White blood cell count decreased | Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia | Eosinophilia | Haematocrit increased | Haemoglobin increased | Leukopenia | Lymphopenia | Neutropenia | Neutrophil count decreased | Platelet count increased | Red blood cell count decreased | Thrombocytopenia | Platelet count decreased | Monocyte count increased | Hypokalaemia | Alanine aminotransferase increased | Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Hypertriglyceridaemia | Dyslipidaemia | Hepatic enzyme increased | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Blood creatinine increased | Blood glucose increased | Hyperglycaemia | Transaminases increased | Blood potassium decreased | Low density lipoprotein increased | Blood albumin decreased | Blood alkaline phosphatase decreased | Blood calcium increased | Blood cholesterol increased | Blood homocysteine increased | Liver function test abnormal | Hyperlipidaemia | Hypoalbuminaemia | Hypoglycaemia | Blood bilirubin increased | Hypocalcaemia | Blood triglycerides increased | Hyperbilirubinaemia | Hypertransaminasaemia | |
Placebo | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, weight and respiratory rate. Vital signs abnormalities recorded as TEAEs were reported. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 61
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyrexia | Hypertension | Weight increased | Blood pressure increased | Chills | Hypertensive crisis | Orthostatic hypotension | Weight decreased | Hypotension | |
Placebo | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of investigational product or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of investigational product, for the period extending until the end of participant participation in the study. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Week 74
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
TEAE | TESAE | |
Placebo | 94 | 19 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 93 | 21 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 97 | 16 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 97 | 22 |
Percentage of participants on >=10 mg/day oral corticosteroids (OCS) at baseline who were able to taper it to <=7.5 mg/day by Day 365 were recorded. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Reduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: Yes | Reduce OCS to <=7.5 mg/day: No | |
Placebo | 6.5 | 93.5 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 6.2 | 93.8 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 8.2 | 91.8 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 9.4 | 90.6 |
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Achieved > 3-point improvement: Yes | Achieved > 3-point improvement: No | |
Placebo | 30.5 | 69.5 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 35.6 | 64.4 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 38.1 | 61.9 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 42.2 | 57.8 |
The CLASI consists of two scores, the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. Damage is scored in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring, including scarring alopecia. The percentage of participants with a CLASI activity score >=10 at baseline who achieved a clinically significant (>=4-point) reduction at Day 365 were reported. (NCT01283139)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Achieved >=4-point reduction: Yes | Achieved >=4-point reduction: No | |
Placebo | 48.6 | 51.4 |
Sifalimumab 1,200 mg | 73.1 | 26.9 |
Sifalimumab 200 Milligram (mg) | 72.7 | 27.3 |
Sifalimumab 600 mg | 57.6 | 42.4 |
Mean Change from Baseline Over Time; Measured by Disease Activity Score 28: A single score on a continuous scale (0-9.4). The level of RA disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28 <=3.2),moderate (3.2 < DAS28 <=5.1), or as high disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1) (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At baseline, Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | -4.63 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -4.63 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -4.75 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | -4.42 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | -3.84 |
Pharmacokinetics of BMS-931699 derived from serum concentration versus time data; Ctrough = Trough level serum concentration of BMS-931699 at time point specified Pharmacokinetic Population: defined as all subjects who receive any study medication and have any available concentration-time data. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Day 169
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 2040 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 640.8 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 207.1 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 62.2 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 0 |
"The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) is a measure of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) response. BICLA is defined as: British Isle Lupus Assessment Group improvement, defined as BILAG As at Baseline improved to B/C/D, and BILAG Bs at baseline improved to C/D, and no BILAG worsening in other BILAG organ systems such that there are no new BILAG As or greater than 1 new BILAG B; and no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline (defined as no increase in SLEDAI total score); and no worsening in the physician's global assessment (MDGA) of disease activity (no worsening is defined as less than 10% worsening, equivalent to a 10mm increase on a 100mm visual analog scale [VAS]) compared to Baseline." (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 59.4 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 63.2 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 57.4 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 58.6 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 59.2 |
Mean change from baseline, CLASI = Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. Scores can range from 0 to 70 with higher scores denoting greater disease activity or damage. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 39.3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 46.9 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 34.5 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 36.1 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 42.4 |
"BICLA is defined as: British Isle Lupus Assessment Group improvement, defined as BILAG As at Baseline improved to B/C/D, and BILAG Bs at baseline improved to C/D, and no BILAG worsening in other BILAG organ systems such that there are no new BILAG As or greater than 1 new BILAG B; and no worsening in the SLEDAI-2K total score compared to Baseline (defined as no increase in SLEDAI total score); and no worsening in the physician's global assessment (MDGA) of disease activity (no worsening is defined as less than 10% worsening, equivalent to a 10mm increase on a 100mm visual analog scale [VAS]) compared to Baseline; No changes in concomitant medications according to the following criteria: No increase of or addition of a new immunosuppressant agent (azathioprine,mycophenolic acid/mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, anti-malarial, leflunomide) over baseline levels; No increase in corticosteroid dose above baseline level outside of those allowed per protocol." (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 69.6 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 64.7 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 57.4 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 57.1 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 54.9 |
RESPIRATION RATE (RESP) (PER MIN) RESP > 16 OR RESP CHANGE FROM BASELINE > 10 (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 82.4 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 85.5 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 75.0 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 70.0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 81.7 |
TEMPERATURE (TEMP) (C) TEMP > 38.3 OR TEMP CHANGE FROM BASELINE > 1.6 (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1.5 |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1.4 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 1.4 |
Overall British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 score, BILAG Scores: A=Severe disease activity, B=Moderate disease activity, C=Mild disease, D=Inactive disease but previously affected, E=System never involved.The categories are converted to a numeric score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) and treated as a continuous variable. Higher score= more severe disease activity. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At baseline, Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
BILAG-2004 Score Day 85 | BILAG-2004 Score Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | -8.66 | -9.73 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -8.83 | -10.46 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | -10.31 | -11.50 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -7.07 | -8.98 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | -7.94 | -9.78 |
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured by asking the physician to assess the participant's current arthritis disease activity by placing a vertical line on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At baseline, Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
MDGA score Day 85 | MDGA score Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | -20.55 | -26.71 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -23.87 | -26.87 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | -28.77 | -29.30 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -21.00 | -28.68 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | -23.83 | -25.28 |
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, SLEDAI; Version 2000, also known as SLEDAI-2K. The SLEDAI-2K score is a weighted, cumulative index of lupus disease activity. SLEDAI-2K is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At baseline, Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Score (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
SLEDAI-2K Score Day 85 | SLEDAI-2K Score Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | -4.02 | -4.82 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -3.24 | -4.17 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | -3.61 | -4.88 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -3.17 | -3.98 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | -3.29 | -4.15 |
Percent of participants requiring use of corticosteroids and mmunosuppressants use over time (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to one day prior to the first dose of long-term extension period or up to 42 days post last short-term dose date, which ever is earlier
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corticosteroids: Oral | Corticosteroids: Oral inhalation | Immunosuppressant | Immunosuppressant Azathioprine | Immunosuppressant Methotrexate | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 84.3 | 0 | 51.4 | 28.6 | 24.3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 82.4 | 0 | 63.2 | 29.4 | 35.3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 89.9 | 0 | 46.4 | 23.2 | 26.1 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 86.8 | 1.5 | 38.2 | 14.7 | 25.0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 94.4 | 0 | 59.2 | 33.8 | 26.8 |
Mean change from baseline, CLASI = Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index. Scores can range from 0 to 70 with higher scores denoting greater disease activity or damage. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 85 | Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | -1.82 | -2.94 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -3.20 | -3.78 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | -2.31 | -3.17 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | -1.69 | -2.47 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | -3.11 | -3.57 |
IMMUNE ACTIVATION MARKERS:C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) CRP MG/L H > 1.5×ULN; CRP, HIGH SENSITIVITY MG/L H > 1.5×ULN; (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Low | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) High | |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 18 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 19 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 22 |
IMMUNE ACTIVATION MARKERS:C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) CRP MG/L H > 1.5×ULN; CRP, HIGH SENSITIVITY MG/L H > 1.5×ULN; (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Low | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) High | CRP, High Sensitivity Low | CRP, High Senstivity High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 18 | NA | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 22 | NA | 1 |
GLUCOSE TESTS:GLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.3×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.3×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN GLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.8×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; PROTEIN TESTS:ALBUMIN G/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN PROTEIN, TOTAL G/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN PROTEIN, TOTAL G/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glucose, Fasting serum, Low | Glucose, Fasting Serum, High | Albumin, Low | Albumin, High | Protein, Total, Low | Protein, Total, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OTHER CHEMISTRY TESTING LIPID TESTS: CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN TRIGLYCERIDES, FASTING MMOL/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN PANCREATIC TESTS: AMYLASE, TOTAL U/L H > 1.5×ULN; LIPASE, TOTAL (TURBIDIMETRIC ASSAY) U/L H > 1.5×ULN; LIPASE, TOTAL (COLORIMETRIC ASSAY) U/L H > 1.5×ULN; ENDOCRINE TESTS:CORTISOL, AM NMOL/L L < 138 THYROID STIMULATING HORMONE (TSH) TSH MU/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cholesterol, Total (TC) Low | Cholesterol, Total (TC) High | Triglycerides, Fasting Low | Triglycerides, Fasting High | Amylase, Total Low | Amylase, Total High | Lipase, Total (Colorimetric Assay) Low | Lipase, Total (Colorimetric Assay) High | Lipase, Total (Turbidimetric Assay) Low | Lipase, Total (Turbidimetric Assay) High | Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Low | Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, High | |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 12 | NA | 12 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 0 |
OTHER CHEMISTRY TESTING LIPID TESTS: CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN TRIGLYCERIDES, FASTING MMOL/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN PANCREATIC TESTS: AMYLASE, TOTAL U/L H > 1.5×ULN; LIPASE, TOTAL (TURBIDIMETRIC ASSAY) U/L H > 1.5×ULN; LIPASE, TOTAL (COLORIMETRIC ASSAY) U/L H > 1.5×ULN; ENDOCRINE TESTS:CORTISOL, AM NMOL/L L < 138 THYROID STIMULATING HORMONE (TSH) TSH MU/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cholesterol, Total (TC) Low | Cholesterol, Total (TC) High | Triglycerides, Fasting Low | Triglycerides, Fasting High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 10 | NA | 10 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 4 | NA | 13 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 5 | NA | 12 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 8 | NA | 8 |
OTHER CHEMISTRY TESTING CARDIAC TESTS: CREATINE KINASE (CK) CK U/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; TROPONIN-I, CARDIAC SPECIFIC UG/L H > ULN; METABOLITE TESTS:URIC ACID URIC MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; CHEM TEST, MULTI INDICATIONS : LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD) LD U/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Creatine Kinase Low | Creatine Kinase High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 5 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 5 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 1 |
OTHER CHEMISTRY TESTING CARDIAC TESTS: CREATINE KINASE (CK) CK U/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; TROPONIN-I, CARDIAC SPECIFIC UG/L H > ULN; METABOLITE TESTS:URIC ACID URIC MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; CHEM TEST, MULTI INDICATIONS : LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD) LD U/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creatine Kinase Low | Creatine Kinase High | TROPONIN-I, CARDIAC SPECIFIC Low | TROPONIN-I, CARDIAC SPECIFIC High | Uric Acid, Low | Uric Acid, High | Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) low | Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) high | |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 3 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 |
QUALITATIVE URINE CHEMISTRY: BLOOD, URINE N/A H >= 2 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR >= 2 IF PRE-RX < 1 OR >= 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX >= 1 GLUCOSE, URINE N/A H >= 1 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR >= 1 IF PRE-RX < 1 OR >= 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX >= 1 PROTEIN, URINE UNKNOWN H >= 2 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR >= 2 IF PRE-RX < 1 OR >= 2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX >= 1 URINALYSIS II URINE WBC + RBC ; RBC, URINE HPF H >= 2 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR >= 2 IF PRE-RX < 2 OR >= 4 IF PRE-RX >= 2 WBC, URINE HPF H >= 2 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR >= 2 IF PRE-RX < 2 OR >= 4 IF PRE-RX >= 2 (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blood, Urine, Low | Blood, Urine, High | Glucose, Urine, Low | Glucose, Urine, High | Protein, Urine, Low | Protein, Urine, High | RBC, Urine, Low | RBC, Urine, High | WBC, Urine, Low | WBC, Urine, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 21 | NA | 0 | NA | 7 | NA | 17 | NA | 31 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 21 | NA | 2 | NA | 7 | NA | 19 | NA | 29 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 18 | NA | 2 | NA | 7 | NA | 18 | NA | 28 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 20 | NA | 0 | NA | 13 | NA | 13 | NA | 31 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 20 | NA | 1 | NA | 10 | NA | 18 | NA | 25 |
CALCIUM, TOTAL MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; CALCIUM, TOTAL MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; CHLORIDE, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; CHLORIDE, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Calcium, Total, Low | Calcium, Total, High | Chloride, Serum, Low | Chloride, Serum, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BICARBONATE MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; BICARBONATE MMOL/L L < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.8×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; POTASSIUM, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; POTASSIUM, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; MAGNESIUM, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN MAGNESIUM, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Potassium, Serum, Low | Potassium, Serum, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1 | 1 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 1 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 1 | 0 |
BICARBONATE MMOL/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; BICARBONATE MMOL/L L < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.8×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.8×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; POTASSIUM, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; POTASSIUM, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN; MAGNESIUM, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.1×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN MAGNESIUM, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.9×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bicarbonate, Low | Bicarbonate, High | Magnesium, Serum, Low | Magnesium, Serum, High | Potassium, Serum, Low | Potassium, Serum, High | |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
SODIUM, SERUM MMOL/L H > 1.05×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.05×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.05×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN SODIUM, SERUM MMOL/L L < 0.95×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.95×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.95×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC PHOS MMOL/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC PHOS MMOL/L L < 0.85×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.85×LLN IF PRE-RX >=LLN OR < 0.85×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sodium, Serum Low | Sodium, Serum High | Phosphorus, Inorganic, Low | Phosphorus, Inorganic, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Although there are no identified risks for BMS-931699, BMS has developed a list of events of special interest for the BMS-931699 program based on the known biologic class effects, the mechanism of action of BMS-931699, overall potential consequences of mmunosuppression, and preliminary data from unblinded clinical trials. Event categories of special interest for this study may include, but are not limited to: Infections, Autoimmunity, Malignancies, Injection-related reactions (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: On or after the first dose date of short-term study medication and up to 42 days post last short-term dose date or up to the day prior to the first dose of long-term extension period, whichever is earlier
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serious Adverse Events | Related SAEs | Related Adverse Events | AEs of Malignancies | AEs of Infections and Infestations | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | Adverse Events of Autoimmunity | Most Common Adverse Events | Adverse Events of Local Injection Reactions | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 8 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 59 | 3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 41 | 5 | 0 | 56 | 8 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 5 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 38 | 8 | 4 | 59 | 10 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 9 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 35 | 9 | 0 | 60 | 10 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 6 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 62 | 4 |
LIVER FUNCTION TESTS:ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) ALP U/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) ALT U/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) AST U/L H > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.25×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN; BILIRUBIN, DIRECT UMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) GGT U/L H > 1.15×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.15×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN BILIRUBIN, TOTAL UMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.25×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine Aminotransferase Low | Alanine Aminotransferase High | Alkaline Phosphatase Low | Alkaline Phosphatase High | Aspartate Aminotransferase Low | Aspartate Aminotransferase High | Bilirubin, Direct Low | Bilirubin Direct, High | Bilirubin Total, Low | Bilirubin Total, High | G-Glutamyl Transferase, Low | G-Glutamyl Transferase, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 9 | NA | 5 | NA | 8 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 15 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 17 | NA | 3 | NA | 13 | NA | 13 | NA | 0 | NA | 14 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 12 | NA | 2 | NA | 10 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 18 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 6 | NA | 2 | NA | 11 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 16 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 8 | NA | 8 | NA | 10 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | 13 |
HEMATOLOGY I: ERYTHROCYTE/PLATELET ATTRIBUTES HEMOGLOBIN G/L L < 0.85×PRE-RX; HEMATOCRIT VOL L < 0.85×PRE-RX; PLATELET COUNT X10*9 C/L H > 1.5×ULN (ULN = Upper Limit of Normal) IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN PLATELET COUNT X10*9 C/L L < 0.85×LLN (LLN = Lower Limit of Normal) IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.85×LLN IF PRE-RX >= LLN OR < 0.85×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN; ERYTHROCYTES RBC X10*12 C/L L < 0.85×PRE-RX HEMATOLOGY II QUANTITATIVE WBC : LEUKOCYTES X10*9 C/L H > 1.2×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.2×ULN IF LLN <= PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.5×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN OR > ULN IF PRE-RX < LLN; LEUKOCYTES WBC X10*9 C/L L < 0.9×LLN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 0.9×LLN IF LLN <= PRE-RX <= ULN OR < 0.85×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < LLN OR < LLN IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Erythrocytes Low | Erythrocytes High | Hematocrit Low | Hematocrit High | Hemoglobin Low | Hemoglobin High | Platelet count low | Platelet count high | Quantitative WBC: Leukocytes low | Quantitative WBC: Leukocytes high | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 3 | NA | 5 | NA | 4 | NA | 1 | 1 | 16 | 3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 4 | NA | 10 | NA | 4 | NA | 1 | 0 | 18 | 1 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 4 | NA | 6 | NA | 4 | NA | 1 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 6 | NA | 5 | NA | 5 | NA | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 5 | NA | 8 | NA | 5 | NA | 2 | 0 | 16 | 1 |
WBC DIFFERENTIAL COUNT: BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 0.4; BLASTS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 0; EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) EOSA X10*9 C/L H > 0.75; LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 7.5; LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L L < 0.75; MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 2; NEUTROPHILS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L L < 1.5 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 1.5 IF PRE-RX >= 1.5 OR < 0.85×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < 1.5; COAGULATION activated Partial thromboplastin time (APTT) SEC H > 1.5×ULN; INTL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) INR FRACTION H > 1.5×ULN PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) PT SEC H > 1.5×ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basophils (Absolute) Low | Basophils (Absolute) High | Eosinophils (Absolute) Low | Eosinophils (Absolute) High | Lymphocytes (Absolute) Low | Lymphocytes (Absolute) High | Monocytes (Absolute) High | Monocytes (Absolute) Low | Neutrophils (Absolute) Low | Neutrophils (Absolute) High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 0 | NA | 2 | 25 | 0 | NA | 0 | 7 | NA |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 0 | NA | 3 | 21 | 0 | NA | 0 | 10 | NA |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | 24 | 0 | NA | 0 | 5 | NA |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | 25 | 0 | NA | 0 | 4 | NA |
WBC DIFFERENTIAL COUNT: BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 0.4; BLASTS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 0; EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) EOSA X10*9 C/L H > 0.75; LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 7.5; LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L L < 0.75; MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L H > 2; NEUTROPHILS (ABSOLUTE) X10*9 C/L L < 1.5 IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR < 1.5 IF PRE-RX >= 1.5 OR < 0.85×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX < 1.5; COAGULATION activated Partial thromboplastin time (APTT) SEC H > 1.5×ULN; INTL NORMALIZED RATIO (INR) INR FRACTION H > 1.5×ULN PROTHROMBIN TIME (PT) PT SEC H > 1.5×ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basophils (Absolute) Low | Basophils (Absolute) High | Blasts (Absolute) Low | Blasts (Absolute) High | Eosinophils (Absolute) Low | Eosinophils (Absolute) High | Lymphocytes (Absolute) Low | Lymphocytes (Absolute) High | Monocytes (Absolute) High | Monocytes (Absolute) Low | Neutrophils (Absolute) Low | Neutrophils (Absolute) High | |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 | 29 | 0 | NA | 0 | 8 | NA |
KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS:BLOOD UREA NITROGEN MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN CREATININE UMOL/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.33×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, CALC. ML/S/M*2 L < 0.8×PRE-RX; UREA UREA MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Blood Urea Nitrogen, Low | Blood Urea Nitrogen, High | Creatinine, Low | Creatinine, High | |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | NA | 10 | NA | 1 |
KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS:BLOOD UREA NITROGEN MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN CREATININE UMOL/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.33×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, CALC. ML/S/M*2 L < 0.8×PRE-RX; UREA UREA MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blood Urea Nitrogen, Low | Blood Urea Nitrogen, High | Creatinine, Low | Creatinine, High | Urea, Low | Urea, High | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 14 | NA | 2 | NA | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 11 | NA | 0 | NA | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | NA | 9 | NA | 2 | NA | 0 |
KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS:BLOOD UREA NITROGEN MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN CREATININE UMOL/L H > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.5×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.33×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, CALC. ML/S/M*2 L < 0.8×PRE-RX; UREA UREA MMOL/L H > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX IS MISSING OR > 1.1×ULN IF PRE-RX <= ULN OR > 1.2×PRE-RX IF PRE-RX > ULN (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of study medication in short-term or long-term extension period
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blood Urea Nitrogen, Low | Blood Urea Nitrogen, High | Creatinine, Low | Creatinine, High | GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, CALC. Low | GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE, CALC. High | Urea, Low | Urea, High | |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | NA | 3 | NA | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 0 |
QTc (corrected QT) Fridericia, PR Interval, QRS Interval and Change from baseline in QTCF (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days post last dose of short-term double-blind study medication or up to the day prior to the start of long-term extension period, whichever is earlier.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTC Fredericia (msec) <= 450 | QTC Fredericia (msec) 450< To <= 480 | QTC Fredericia (msec) 480 < to <= 500 | QTC Fredericia (msec) > 500 | PR Interval (msec) <= 200 | PR Interval (msec) > 200 | QRS Interval (msec) <= 120 | QRS Interval (msec) > 120 | Change from baseline in QTCF (msec) <= 30 | Change from baseline in QTCF (msec) 30 To <= 60 | Change from baseline in QTCF (msec) > 60 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 56 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 66 | 4 | 67 | 3 | 55 | 2 | 3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 58 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 68 | 0 | 67 | 1 | 59 | 7 | 2 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 56 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 69 | 0 | 68 | 1 | 66 | 2 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 58 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 64 | 4 | 66 | 2 | 54 | 7 | 3 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 65 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 68 | 3 | 70 | 1 | 62 | 5 | 0 |
"SRI is the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index. An SRI(4) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 4 points AND (a)no worsening in the physician's global assessment (MDGA) of disease activity (no worsening is defined as less than 10% worsening, equivalent to a 10mm increase on a 100mm visual analog scale [VAS]) compared to Baseline) AND (b) no new BILAG-2004 Index A organ system score AND (c)no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system scores.~An SRI(5) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 5 points AND (a) AND (b) AND (c).~An SRI(6) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 6 points AND (a) AND (b) AND (c) The outcomes are better in increasing order from SRI(4) to SRI(5) to SRI(6)" (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
SRI (4) | SRI (5) | SRI (6) | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 44.3 | 31.4 | 31.4 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 48.5 | 29.4 | 26.5 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 55.1 | 37.7 | 37.7 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 39.7 | 27.9 | 27.9 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 49.3 | 33.8 | 33.8 |
"SRI is the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index. An SRI(4) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 4 points AND (a)no worsening in the physician's global assessment (MDGA) of disease activity (no worsening is defined as less than 10% worsening, equivalent to a 10mm increase on a 100mm visual analog scale [VAS]) compared to Baseline) AND (b) no new BILAG-2004 Index A organ system score AND (c)no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system scores.~An SRI(5) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 5 points AND (a) AND (b) AND (c).~An SRI(6) Response is defined as a reduction in Day 1 SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of ≥ 6 points AND (a) AND (b) AND (c) The outcomes are better in increasing order from SRI(4) to SRI(5) to SRI(6)" (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
SRI (4) | SRI (5) | SRI (6) | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 47.1 | 31.4 | 31.4 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 48.5 | 32.4 | 30.9 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 49.3 | 29.0 | 29.0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 41.2 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 43.7 | 28.2 | 26.8 |
Immunogenicity defined as positive for anti-drug antibodies post-baseline measurement if baseline missing or negative. If baseline is positive, then immunogenicity is defined as a positive post-baseline measurement with titer value 4 times greater than baseline. (A) all subjects with a laboratory reported positive antibody responses to BMS-931699 during the short-term double-blind treatment period are included. Overall: At least one positive sample relative to baseline during short-term double-blind and follow-up period. (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
% with Neutralizing activity | % with Neutralizing activity (Baseline) | % with Neutralizing activity (Overall) | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 34.1 | 0 | 34.1 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 41.2 | 5.9 | 35.3 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 23.1 | 0 | 23.1 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 64.7 | 0 | 64.7 |
SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (SYSBP) (MMHG); SYSBP > 140 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE > 20 OR SYSBP < 90 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE < -20; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (DIABP) > 90 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE > 10 OR DIABP < 55 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE < -10; (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MMHG) SITTING | SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MMHG) STANDING | SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MMHG) SUPINE | DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MM HG) SITTING | DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MM HG) STANDING | DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (MM HG) SUPINE | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 10.0 | 11.4 | 0 | 17.1 | 21.4 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 11.6 | 14.5 | 0 | 26.1 | 18.8 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 17.6 | 14.7 | 0 | 17.6 | 27.9 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 10.3 | 8.8 | 1 | 11.8 | 25.0 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 15.5 | 20.0 | 0 | 9.9 | 20.0 | 0 |
HEART RATE (HR) Beats per min (BPM): HR > 100 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE > 30 OR HR < 55 AND CHANGE FROM BASELINE < -15 (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HEART RATE (BPM) SITTING | HEART RATE (BPM) STANDING | HEART RATE (BPM) SUPINE | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 2.9 | 7.1 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 2.9 | 4.3 | 0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 5.9 | 5.9 | 0 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 2.9 | 7.4 | 0 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 0 |
Serum biomarkers C3, C4, anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and other autoantibodies were measured from blood serum samples collected on Day 85 and Day 169 (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C3, Baseline | C3, Day 85 | C3, Day 169 | C4, Baseline | C4, Day 85 | C4, Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1.028 | 1.083 | 1.077 | 0.202 | 0.215 | 0.207 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 1.029 | 1.014 | 1.010 | 0.185 | 0.195 | 0.185 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 1.068 | 1.037 | 1.045 | 0.201 | 0.206 | 0.212 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0.990 | 1.030 | 1.027 | 0.177 | 0.190 | 0.187 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 0.991 | 0.986 | 0.992 | 0.183 | 0.179 | 0.184 |
Serum biomarkers C3, C4, anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and other autoantibodies were measured from blood serum samples collected on Day 85 and Day 169. No anti-dsDNA data was available for this report (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline Negative Day 85 Negative | Baseline Negative Day 85 Positive | Baseline Positive Day 85 Negative | Baseline Positive Day 85 Positive | Baseline Negative Day 169 Negative | Baseline Negative Day 169 Positive | Baseline Positive Day 169 Negative | Baseline Positive Day 169 Positive | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 50.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 98.0 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 4.3 | 95.7 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 57.1 | 42.9 | 3.4 | 96.6 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 2.0 | 98.0 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 62.5 | 37.5 | 11.3 | 88.7 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 9.3 | 90.7 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 100.0 | 0 | 1.8 | 98.2 | 100.0 | 0 | 5.8 | 94.2 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 1.8 | 98.2 |
Percent CD4+ Receptor Occupancy and percent CD8+ Receptor Occupancy (NCT02265744)
Timeframe: At Day 85 and Day 169
Intervention | Percentage (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%CD4+ RO Baseline | %CD4+ RO Day 85 | %CD4+ RO Day 169 | %CD8+ RO Baseline | %CD8+ RO Day 85 | %CD8+ RO Day 169 | |
Experimental: 1.25mg SCBMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 37.155 | 44.115 | 0 | 32.516 | 40.989 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 83.244 | 77.210 | 0 | 81.730 | 74.726 |
Experimental: 12.5mg SC BMS-931699 Weekly | 0 | 95.722 | 92.390 | 0 | 95.831 | 92.043 |
Experimental: 5mg SC Injection BMS-931699 Every Other Week | 0 | 70.520 | 74.286 | 0 | 68.960 | 69.850 |
Placebo Comparator: 0mg SC Weekly BMS-931699 | 0 | 0.350 | 0.334 | 0 | 0.160 | 0.235 |
"British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 index, it categorizes disease activity into 5 different levels from A to E, with Grade A representing very active disease and Grade E indicating no current or previous disease activity. Scoring was based on a total of 101 items, grouped into 9 organ/systems and the summation of the numerical values for the nine-system scores was given by the following formula: Numerical global score = A*12 + B*8 + C*1, where A, B and C represent the number of Grades A, B and C respectively at each assessment. Grades D and E are considered as 0 (Chee-Seng Yee et al, 2010). The minimum score is 0 with no predefined maximum. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.~The BILAG global score change from baseline to Last Available Value (LVA) week 24 and week 36 were presented analyzed." (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | -11.43 |
Placebo | -10.76 |
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) was specifically developed to assess the cutaneous manifestations of SLE. It measures both disease activity and permanent damage (e.g. dyspigmentation and scarring) over the entire body surface. CLASI total activity score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | -3.22 |
Placebo | -2.85 |
mean daily dose of corticosteroid (CS) (prednisone equivalent) (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At W36
Intervention | mg/day (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 5.42 |
Placebo | 7.06 |
"British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:~All BILAG A scores at baseline improve to B/C/D and all BILAG B scores improve to C/D at W36, and~No BILAG worsening in other body systems: no new BILAG A or ≥ 2 new BILAG B scores at W36, and~No worsening in SLEDAI-2K total score at W36 compared with baseline, and~No deterioration in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (< 10% worsening) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 100 mm at W36 compared with baseline, and~No addition or increased dose level of anti-malarial drugs or immunosuppressive drugs or CS* between W24 and W36 (*≤5 mg prednisolone or equivalent /day at W24 and no increase until W36)." (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 35 |
Placebo | 29 |
Subjects who had the following criteria defined as : SRI-4 plus CS ≤5mg/day -excluding IFN-K subjects without positive anti-IFN-alpha neutralizing antibodies (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 40 |
Placebo | 30 |
participant who had the following criteria defined as : SRI-4 plus CS ≤7.5mg/day -excluding IFN-K Patients without positive anti-IFN-alpha neutralizing antibodies (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 43 |
Placebo | 33 |
"SRI-4 plus CS ≤ 5mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at Week 36:~reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and~no new BILAG A at week 36, and~no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and~no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus corticosteroids (CS) ≤5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36" (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 43 |
Placebo | 30 |
"SRI (4) plus CS ≤ 7.5 mg/day responder was defined as a participant who had the following criteria at week 36:~reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and~no new BILAG A at week 36, and~no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and~no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline plus CS ≤7.5mg equivalent prednisolone per day at week 36" (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 46 |
Placebo | 33 |
"Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was conceptually defined as 'a state which, if sustained, is associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety'. Subsequently defined using consensus methodology, LLDAS is attained if all the following items are met:~SLEDAI-2K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity~No new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment~SELENA-SLEDAI physician global assessment (PGA, scale 0-3) ≤1~Current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose ≤7.5 mg daily~Well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs" (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 45 |
Placebo | 25 |
"SLE Responder Index (SRI); SRI-4 responder was defined as a subject who had the following criteria at week 36:~reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI at week 36 compared with baseline, and~no new BILAG A at week 36, and~no more than 1 new BILAG B at week 36, and~no deterioration in PGA (<10% worsening) on 100-mm VAS compared with baseline" (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: W36 (9 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 57 |
Placebo | 54 |
Individual serum antibody neutralizing capacity against recombinant IFN-alpha2b was measured by reporter gene assay using Interferon Sensitive Response Element (ISRE) reporter. (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: At week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 72 |
Placebo | 0 |
Number of participants who reported any treatment-related adverse events until month 9 (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: 9 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
IFN-K | 75 |
Placebo | 71 |
The biological endpoint aimed at evaluating the neutralization of the IFN gene signature following treatment with IFN-K compared to placebo, as measured by the % change from baseline of the expression of IFN-induced genes. (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: Baseline and Last Available Value (LVA) between week 24 and week 36
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | -31.04 |
Placebo | -0.44 |
Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLEDAI, is a slightly modified version of the SLEDAI. This is a weighted index in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) for each of nine organ systems are given a weighted score and summed up if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The maximum theoretical score for the SELENA SLEDAI is 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously) with 0 indicating inactive disease. (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36
Intervention | SELENA SLEDAI Score (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | -5.48 |
Placebo | -5.54 |
Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLICC/ACR-DI) captures permanent changes which have occurred in patients with SLE, regardless of causality. The questionnaire contains 41 items covering 12 different organ systems. The score of items ranges from 1 to 3 and the total score from 0 to 47. By definition score 0 corresponds to diagnostics and damage over time can only be stable or increase, theoretically to a maximum of 47 points. (NCT02665364)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
IFN-K | -0.09 |
Placebo | -0.17 |
A participants-reported scale that measures the severity of fatigue based on the worst fatigue experienced during the past 24-hours. The severity scores ranged from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (fatigue as severe as you can imagine). (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | -0.7 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | -0.5 |
Placebo | -0.5 |
PGA is a single-item clinician rated assessment of the participant's current level of disease activity measured on a continuous 100-millimeter (mm) visual analytic scale with benchmarks of 0, 1, 2, and 3 from left to right corresponding to no, mild, moderate, and severe SLE disease activity. Scores are presented from 0 to 100. No worsening defined as increase of ≤ 0.30 points from Baseline. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | -21.2 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | -19.2 |
Placebo | -15.1 |
Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment - SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score is a weighted, cumulative index of lupus disease activity. SELENA-SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | -5.1 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | -4.8 |
Placebo | -3.7 |
Anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA) is a lab analyte used to assist in the diagnosis of SLE. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | International Units (IU) (Mean) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | -27.7 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | -26.4 |
Placebo | -7.0 |
The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) instrument assesses global disease activity across 9 organ system domains. BILAG flare is assessed for each of the 9 organ domains using BILAG2004 index flare rules; A is a severe flare and B is a moderate flare. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 134 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 144 |
Placebo | 160 |
A participant achieves corticosteroid sparing effects (quiescent disease) if they have met the following criteria during Weeks 24 through 52; able to decrease their dose of prednisone or equivalent to 7.5 mg/day or less, have quiescent disease (BILAG C score or better in all nine systems), and no BILAG A or B flares in the previous three months, without an increase in either antimalarials or immunosuppressants on or prior to the visit. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 21.2 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 14.7 |
Placebo | 11.5 |
"Percentage of participants with a ≥ 5 point reduction from baseline in SELENA SLEDAI score, and no worsening (increase of < 0.30 points from baseline) in PGA, and no new BILAG A or no more than 1 new BILAG B organ domain flare compared with baseline. (Primary outcome modified to use BILAG flare instead of BILAG disease score)~SELENA SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105. PGA is a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). BILAG flare is assessed for each of the 9 organ domains; A is a severe flare and B is a moderate flare. Participants who were unable to comply with allowed concomitant medications requirements were considered non-responders, as were participants who dropped out or were missing Week 52 data." (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 38.7 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 34.8 |
Placebo | 27.7 |
"Percentage of participants with a ≥ 5 point reduction from baseline in SELENA SLEDAI score, and no worsening (increase of < 0.30 points from baseline) in PGA, and no new BILAG A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with baseline.~SELENA SLEDAI is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105; scores > 20 are rare. PGA is a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). BILAG uses a single score for each of the 9 organ domains; range is from severe (A) to no disease (E). Participants who were unable to comply with allowed concomitant medications requirements were considered non-responders, as were participants who dropped out or were missing Week 52 data." (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 38.5 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 34.8 |
Placebo | 27.7 |
An increase in corticosteroids at a visit was defined as a change from baseline greater than 2.5 mg/day in dose or prednisone or equivalent using average daily dose of corticosteroids taken since the previous scheduled visit. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 4.7 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 6.2 |
Placebo | 5.9 |
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a single-item clinician rated assessment of the participant's current level of disease activity measured on a continuous 100-mm visual analytic scale with benchmarks of 0, 1, 2, and 3 from left to right corresponding to no, mild, moderate, and severe SLE disease activity. Scores are presented from 0 to 100.No worsening defined as increase of ≤ 0.30 points from Baseline. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 32.8 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 37.8 |
Placebo | 42.8 |
SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score is a weighted, cumulative index of lupus disease activity. SLEDAI-2K is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | 52 Weeks | |
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 10.3 | -4.9 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 10.4 | -4.7 |
Placebo | 9.8 | -3.6 |
The LupusQoL is a disease-specific, 34-item, self-report questionnaire designed to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of participants with SLE within 8 domains.Responses are based on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 (all of the time) to 4 (never). A LupusQoL score for each domain is reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better HRQoL. (NCT01205438)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Health | Emotional Health | Body Image | Pain | Planning | Fatigue | Intimate Relationships | Burden to Others | |
LY2127399 Every 2 Weeks | 69.0 | 72.7 | 73.6 | 68.5 | 71.0 | 65.5 | 68.4 | 62.6 |
LY2127399 Every 4 Weeks | 66.2 | 72.3 | 72.8 | 67.5 | 70.7 | 62.4 | 66.1 | 63.7 |
Placebo | 70.7 | 74.0 | 73.1 | 71.4 | 73.2 | 69.3 | 72.4 | 69.2 |
Clinical remission was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. The duration of clinical remission (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a clinical remission responder at all visits and was calculated as the first visit of clinical remission minus last visit of clinical remission plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 31.0 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 73.0 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 176.0 |
Duration of disease control was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. The duration of disease control (PI assessed) was the longest period between 2 visits that the participant was a disease control responder at all visits and calculated as the first visit of disease control minus last visit of disease control plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 49.5 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 116.0 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 116.0 |
Percentage of participants with a state of CLR (PI assessed) at Week 104 was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores) achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day, sustained for at least 24 weeks(from Week 80 to Week 104). Sustained CLR is longest period a participant maintains CLR without a break, calculated as last consecutive CLR date minus first consecutive CLR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: From Week 80 to Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 2.8 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 2.1 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 4.3 |
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic [dsDNA] and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day at Week 64. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Week 64
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 5.6 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 6.3 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 10.6 |
Percentage of participants with a state of CR (Principal Investigator [PI] assessed) was defined as percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K=0 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day,sustained for at least 24 weeks. Sustained CR was longest period a participant maintains CR without break calculated as last consecutive CR date minus first consecutive CR date plus 1. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores indicates increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of CR sustained for at least 24 weeks at any visit during Week 52 to Week 104 were reported. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Week 52 to Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 2.8 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 0 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 6.4 |
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 104. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 6.9 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 11.1 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 21.3 |
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (Independent blinded assessor [IBA]) was defined as the percentage of participants with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000(SLEDAI-2K)score less than or equal to(<=)2 achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day at Week 52. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in previous 10 days,consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 16.7 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 19.4 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 25.5 |
Clinical remission sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K score=0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. Time to CLR (PI assessed) was defined as first visit of sustained CLR until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained CLR was longest period a participant maintained clinical remission without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | NA |
Belimumab + Rituximab | NA |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | NA |
Disease control sustained for at least 24 weeks and maintained through Week 104 was defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. Time to disease control (PI assessed) was defined as the first visit of sustained disease control until Week 104 on or before Week 80 minus treatment start date (Day 1) plus 1. Sustained disease control was longest period a participant maintained disease control without a break. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K , ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms),higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | NA |
Belimumab + Rituximab | NA |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | NA |
Time to first SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first flare was measured by modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 168.0 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 170.0 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 168.0 |
Time to first severe SLE flare was the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event. Time to first severe flare was defined as event date minus treatment start date plus 1. Time to first severe flare was measured by Modified SLE flare index which identifies whether a participant had experienced a mild/moderate or severe flare. Analysis of first severe flare was performed on the modified SLE Flare index that excludes severe flares that were triggered only by an increase is SLEDAI-2K score to greater than 12. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Belimumab + Placebo | 372.0 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 379.0 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 730.0 |
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The higher score for the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses from all questions (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Week 64;n=62, 117, 36 | Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 4.2 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 5.7 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 4.6 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 7.1 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 2.9 | 3.1 |
LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health related qualify of life (HRQOL) instrument with 34 questions across 8 domains:Physical health(8 items),Pain(3 items),Planning(3 items),Intimate relationship(2 items),Burden to others(3 items),Emotional health(6 items),Body image(5 items),Fatigue(4 items). Questions were related to participants experience in prior 4 weeks.A 5-point Likert response format was used, ranging from 0(all of the time) to 4(never) for each question. Individual domain scores were reported which were calculated by taking sum of responses to all items within each domain. Individual domain scores range:Physical health(0-32),Pain(0-12),Planning(0-12),Intimate relationship(0-8),Burden to others(0-12),Emotional health(0-24),Body image(0-20),Fatigue(0-16). Higher score indicates better HRQOL. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical health; Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Physical health; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Physical health; Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Physical health; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Physical health; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Physical health; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Physical health; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Physical health; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | Pain; Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Pain; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Pain; Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Pain; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Pain; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Pain; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Pain; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Pain; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | Planning; Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Planning; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Planning; Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Planning; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Planning; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Planning; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Planning; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Planning; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | Intimate relationship; Week 8; n=51, 110, 36 | Intimate relationship; Week 12; n=52, 106, 36 | Intimate relationship; Week 26; n=48, 86, 30 | Intimate relationship; Week 40; n=50, 94, 30 | Intimate relationship; Week 52; n=51, 91, 30 | Intimate relationship; Week 64; n=47, 90, 25 | Intimate relationship; Week 72; n=42, 83, 21 | Intimate relationship; Week 104; n=40, 85,27 | Burden to others; Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Burden to others; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Burden to others; Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Burden to others; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Burden to others; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Burden to others; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Burden to others; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Burden to others; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | Emotional health; Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Emotional health; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Emotional health; Week 26; n=61,115, 40 | Emotional health; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Emotional health; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Emotional health; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Emotional health; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Emotional health; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | Body image; Week 8; n=60, 114, 37 | Body image; Week 12; n=58, 118, 39 | Body image; Week 26; n=56, 96, 33 | Body image; Week 40; n=54, 103, 35 | Body image; Week 52; n=55, 101, 33 | Body image; Week 64; n=52, 98, 27 | Body image; Week 72; n=44, 93, 25 | Body image; Week 104; n=48, 94, 28 | Fatigue; Week 8; n=66,132, 44 | Fatigue; Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Fatigue; Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Fatigue; Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Fatigue; Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Fatigue; Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Fatigue; Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Fatigue; Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 5.8 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 12.3 | 13.9 | 10.2 | 13.1 | 13.8 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 12.1 | -1.2 | -2.6 | -1.3 | 4.3 | 4.7 | -4.5 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 8.7 | 13.9 | 16.5 | 14.4 | 17.1 | 18.9 | 5.2 | 8.1 | 7.7 | 9.7 | 10.2 | 8.1 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 8.9 | 7.9 | 6.0 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 11.9 | 14.2 | 10.5 | 12.1 | 9.4 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 6.0 | 5.8 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 11.4 | 13.0 | 17.2 | 18.0 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 17.0 | 19.0 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 9.9 | 12.2 | 12.6 | 14.5 | 11.4 | 14.2 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 8.9 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 11.0 | 8.6 | 11.2 | 6.8 | 8.4 | 10.5 | 12.6 | 14.9 | 17.0 | 14.4 | 15.0 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 7.8 | 9.3 | 6.2 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 10.1 | 9.0 | 8.2 | 9.1 | 11.3 | 8.7 | 11.4 | 9.2 | 7.0 | 11.4 | 10.3 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 13.1 | 14.3 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 6.3 | 6.4 | 11.6 | 8.2 | 11.6 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.2 | 10.4 | 6.1 | 13.1 | 12.6 | 15.7 | 13.2 | 11.9 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 7.8 | 12.1 | 10.7 | 14.0 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 14.2 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 12.5 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 10.6 | 6.4 | 7.5 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 12.3 | 11.1 | 12.7 | 11.6 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 11.4 | 8.1 | 6.6 | 10.5 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 10.3 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 10.4 | 11.9 | 11.3 | 16.6 | 10.8 | 11.6 | 9.7 |
The Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity is a single-item, participant reported scale developed for the assessment of the participant's overall rating of their disease activity due to SLE. The scale measures disease activity ranging from 0 (Very Well) to 10 (Very Poor) and the higher score indicates severe disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Week 40; n=63, 123, 43 | Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | -0.96 | -0.69 | -0.95 | -1.77 | -1.74 | -1.41 | -1.46 | -1.61 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | -1.06 | -1.07 | -1.50 | -1.60 | -1.82 | -1.96 | -1.81 | -2.00 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | -0.91 | -1.57 | -1.57 | -1.67 | -1.84 | -1.96 | -1.43 | -1.98 |
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) was a physician-reported visual analogue scale that provides an overall measure of the participant's current disease activity. Physician's Global Assessment was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). The PGA score was then rescaled for reporting by multiplying the collected score by 3 divided by 10. Hence, the PGA score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4; n=72, 142, 45 | Week 8; n=66, 135, 44 | Week 12; n=66, 137, 44 | Week 16; n=68, 132, 44 | Week 20; n=66, 130, 44 | Week 24; n=62, 130, 43 | Week 26; n=62, 120, 40 | Week 28; n=63, 127, 43 | Week 32; n=62, 124, 43 | Week 36; n=64, 126, 43 | Week 40; n=63, 126, 43 | Week 44; n=63, 124, 43 | Week 48; n=59, 121, 40 | Week 52; n=64, 122, 41 | Week 60; n=61, 120, 37 | Week 64; n=62, 120, 36 | Week 72; n=58, 110, 33 | Week 80; n=57, 112, 37 | Week 88; n=59, 109, 36 | Week 96; n=54, 109, 35 | Week 104; n=55, 114, 36 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | -0.285 | -0.535 | -0.592 | -0.619 | -0.697 | -0.770 | -0.786 | -0.781 | -0.851 | -0.916 | -0.893 | -0.800 | -0.885 | -0.947 | -0.836 | -0.876 | -0.928 | -0.949 | -1.060 | -1.016 | -1.052 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | -0.247 | -0.520 | -0.660 | -0.717 | -0.787 | -0.766 | -0.811 | -0.817 | -0.864 | -0.927 | -0.925 | -0.905 | -0.928 | -0.938 | -0.848 | -0.943 | -0.944 | -0.954 | -0.993 | -0.994 | -1.074 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | -0.303 | -0.585 | -0.654 | -0.759 | -0.786 | -0.965 | -0.929 | -0.980 | -1.005 | -0.917 | -0.993 | -0.970 | -0.956 | -1.004 | -1.206 | -1.095 | -1.047 | -1.138 | -1.140 | -1.214 | -1.085 |
The SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in the preceding 10 days. Weighted scores for central nervous system (CNS) (7 items) was 8; for vascular (1 item) was 8; for Musculoskeletal (2 items) was 4; for Renal (4 items) was 4; for Mucocutaneous (3 items) was 2; for Cardiovascular and Respiratory (2 items) was 2; for Immunologic (2 items) was 2;for Constitutional (1 item) was 1 and for Hematologic (2 items) was 1. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4; n=69, 137, 43 | Week 8; n=63, 132, 43 | Week 12; n=63, 131, 43 | Week 16; n=65, 129, 43 | Week 20; n=63, 127, 44 | Week 24; n=61, 128, 43 | Week 26; n=61, 118, 40 | Week 28; n=62, 125, 43 | Week 32; n=61, 125, 43 | Week 36; n=61, 125, 43 | Week 40; n=62, 125, 43 | Week 44; n=62, 122, 43 | Week 48; n=59, 122, 40 | Week 52; n=62, 119, 39 | Week 60; n=57, 114, 37 | Week 64; n=60, 117, 36 | Week 72; n=49, 103, 30 | Week 80; n=46, 102, 36 | Week 88; n=49, 101, 34 | Week 96; n=49, 100, 34 | Week 104; n=50, 104, 34 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | -1.4 | -3.2 | -2.8 | -3.4 | -3.8 | -4.0 | -4.1 | -3.7 | -4.7 | -5.0 | -4.6 | -4.7 | -4.5 | -5.3 | -5.0 | -5.1 | -5.2 | -5.4 | -5.3 | -5.6 | -5.1 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | -0.8 | -2.9 | -3.6 | -4.4 | -5.0 | -5.0 | -5.4 | -5.1 | -5.7 | -5.6 | -5.8 | -6.1 | -6.2 | -6.1 | -5.8 | -6.2 | -6.6 | -6.5 | -6.5 | -7.0 | -7.2 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | -1.3 | -2.9 | -2.9 | -4.1 | -3.8 | -5.0 | -5.0 | -5.2 | -5.3 | -5.0 | -5.0 | -5.2 | -5.3 | -5.6 | -6.0 | -5.5 | -5.3 | -6.0 | -6.1 | -6.1 | -6.3 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. AESIs were Malignant Neoplasms, Post-Injection Systemic Reactions (PISR), All Infections of Special Interest (Opportunistic Infections (OI), Herpes Zoster (HZ), Tuberculosis (TB), and Sepsis), Depression (including mood disorders and anxiety)/suicide/self-injury and Deaths. Data for number of participants with AESIs has been summarized. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Malignant Neoplasms | PISR | All Infections of Special Interest | Depression/suicide/self-injury | Deaths | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 1 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 1 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 1 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 2 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Data for number of participants with SAE and non-SAE (>=5 %) has been summarized. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Up to Week 111 (including 8 weeks of safety follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
SAE | non-SAE | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 10 | 48 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 32 | 109 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 15 | 53 |
Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) SLEDAI-2K <=4, with no activity in major organ systems (renal, CNS, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever) and no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity; (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; (3) PGA (scale 0-3), <=1; (4) current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose <=7.5 mg daily; and (5) well tolerated standard maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biological agents, excluding investigational drugs. Percentage of participants that met the LLDAS response criteria were reported. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 26 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | Week 60 | Week 64 | Week 72 | Week 80 | Week 88 | Week 96 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 0 | 9.7 | 8.3 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 12.5 | 22.2 | 20.8 | 29.2 | 30.6 | 22.2 | 30.6 | 26.4 | 27.8 | 26.4 | 20.8 | 22.2 | 18.1 | 23.6 | 20.8 | 20.8 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 2.1 | 1.4 | 9.7 | 16.7 | 25.7 | 22.2 | 25.7 | 25.0 | 31.9 | 34.0 | 33.3 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 34.0 | 23.6 | 30.6 | 31.3 | 26.4 | 24.3 | 30.6 | 32.6 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 2.1 | 10.6 | 6.4 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 36.2 | 34.0 | 34.0 | 36.2 | 29.8 | 38.3 | 31.9 | 31.9 | 29.8 | 36.2 | 31.9 | 31.9 | 34.0 | 29.8 | 36.2 | 38.3 |
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission (IBA) was defined as percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days, consisting 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 64, 80 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 64 | Week 80 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 5.6 | 4.2 | 1.4 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 6.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 10.6 | 12.8 | 6.4 |
Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission was defined as the percentage of participants with a clinical SLEDAI-2K score =0 (does not include anti-dsDNA and complement activity scores), achieved without immunosuppressants (which was allowed in Belimumab+ Standard therapy arm only) and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. The clinical SLEDAI-2K score was sum of 22 out of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K and ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 101 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of clinical remission using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 60 | Week 64 | Week 72 | Week 80 | Week 88 | Week 96 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 3.5 | 5.6 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 10.6 | 10.6 | 14.9 | 14.9 | 14.9 | 12.8 | 6.4 |
Percentage of participants with a state of complete remission (PI assessed) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score =0, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of 0 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in the previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within for each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 60 | Week 64 | Week 72 | Week 80 | Week 88 | Week 96 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 5.6 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 8.5 | 4.3 | 6.4 | 4.3 |
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control (IBA) was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day. SLEDAI-2K was a weighted, cumulative index for measuring SLE disease activity in previous 10 days which consisted of 24 individual items in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment for each item within each of 9 organ systems were given a weighted score (1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity) and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. The SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from the SLEDAI-2K which ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 80 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 26 | Week 40 | Week 52 | Week 64 | Week 80 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 8.3 | 16.7 | 13.9 | 16.7 | 11.1 | 6.9 | 6.9 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 12.5 | 21.5 | 20.8 | 19.4 | 18.1 | 13.2 | 11.1 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 21.3 | 25.5 | 23.4 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 27.7 | 21.3 |
Percentage of participants with a state of disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a SLEDAI-2K score <=2, achieved without immunosuppressants and with corticosteroids at a prednisone equivalent dose of <=5 mg/day, using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2K consisted of 24 individual items within each of 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score (1 to 8, higher score indicates increased activity) and summed if present at the time of visit or in preceding 10 days. SLEDAI-2K score was the sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms), higher scores representing increased disease activity. Percentage of participants with a state of disease control using the PI assessment of SLEDAI-2K were summarized. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 26 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | Week 60 | Week 64 | Week 72 | Week 80 | Week 88 | Week 96 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 2.8 | 13.9 | 11.1 | 15.3 | 13.9 | 18.1 | 15.3 | 11.1 | 15.3 | 19.4 | 16.7 | 18.1 | 18.1 | 19.4 | 18.1 | 11.1 | 9.7 | 8.3 | 11.1 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 3.5 | 9.0 | 12.5 | 22.2 | 24.3 | 25.0 | 25.7 | 25.7 | 28.5 | 27.8 | 24.3 | 26.4 | 26.4 | 20.1 | 20.8 | 18.1 | 12.5 | 13.2 | 9.7 | 12.5 | 11.8 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 8.5 | 21.3 | 19.1 | 29.8 | 31.9 | 34.0 | 25.5 | 36.2 | 31.9 | 27.7 | 23.4 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 23.4 | 27.7 | 23.4 | 31.9 | 21.3 | 31.9 | 23.4 |
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item questionnaire completed by the participant, which provides a measure of fatigue/quality of life, with a 7-day recall period. The participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions, the greater the fatigue. The total score was the sum of the responses (inverted for reversed items) multiplied by 13, then divided by the number of questions answered, ranging from 0 (worse fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue) where a higher score indicates an improvement in the participant's health status and decrease in the score indicates worse fatigue/quality of life. A participant was considered to had an improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference if they had >=4 points improvement in their FACIT-Fatigue Scale score from Baseline. Percentage of participants with improvement in FACIT-Fatigue scale score exceeding the MCID (>=4 points) were summarized. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 12, 26, 40, 52, 64, 72 and 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 8; n=66, 132, 44 | Week 12; n=66, 133, 44 | Week 26; n=61, 115, 40 | Week 40; n=63, 122, 43 | Week 52; n=64, 120, 41 | Week 64; n=62, 117, 36 | Week 72; n=59, 107, 33 | Week 104; n=55, 111, 36 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 47.0 | 56.1 | 47.5 | 54.0 | 60.9 | 51.6 | 57.6 | 56.4 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 51.5 | 50.4 | 56.5 | 54.1 | 58.3 | 59.8 | 57.0 | 62.2 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 59.1 | 52.3 | 45.0 | 53.5 | 56.1 | 52.8 | 42.4 | 44.4 |
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. An improvement was defined as a decrease(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Data for following organ systems was reported: CNS total, Vascular total, Musculoskeletal total, Renal total, Mucocutaneous total, Cardiovascular (Cardio) and Respiratory (Resp) total, Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Total; Week 4; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 8; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 12; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 16; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 20; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 24; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 26; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 28; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 32; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 36; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 40; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 44; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 48; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 52; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 60; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 64; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 72; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 80; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 88; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 96; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 104; n=2,3,2 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 4; n= 57, 110, 34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 8; n=57,110, 34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 12; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 16; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 20; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 24; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total;; Week 26; n=57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 28; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 32; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 36; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 40; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 44; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 48; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 52; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 60; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 64; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 72; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 80; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 88; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 96; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 104; n= 57,110,34 | Renal Total; Week 4; n= 14,23,8 | Renal Total; Week 8; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 12; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 16; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 20; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 24; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 26; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 28; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 32; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 36; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 40; n=14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 44; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 48; n=14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 52; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 60; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 64; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 72; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 80; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 88; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 96; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 104; n= 14, 23, 8 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 4; n= 59, 126,43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 8; n= 59,126,43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 12; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 16; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 20; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 24; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 26; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 28; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 32; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 36; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 40; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 44; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 48; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 52; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 60; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 64; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 72; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 80; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 88; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 96; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 104; n= 59, 126, 43 | Immunologic Total; Week 4; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 8; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 12; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 16; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 20; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 24; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 26; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 28; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 32; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 36; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 40; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 44; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 48; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 52; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 60; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 64; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 72; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 80; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 88; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 96; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 104; n=48, 104, 34 | Hematologic Total; Week 4; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 8; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 12; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 16; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 20; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 24; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 26; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 28; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 32; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 36; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 40; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 44; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 48; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 52; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 60; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 64; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 72; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 80; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 88; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 96; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 104; n= 8, 19, 3 | |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 23.5 | 50.0 | 47.1 | 67.6 | 64.7 | 70.6 | 73.5 | 76.5 | 76.5 | 76.5 | 73.5 | 76.5 | 73.5 | 73.5 | 67.6 | 67.6 | 58.8 | 76.5 | 67.6 | 70.6 | 67.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 37.5 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 37.5 | 50.0 | 32.6 | 51.2 | 55.8 | 67.4 | 69.8 | 69.8 | 65.1 | 69.8 | 74.4 | 69.8 | 67.4 | 69.8 | 69.8 | 69.8 | 67.4 | 62.8 | 58.1 | 62.8 | 67.4 | 62.7 | 60.5 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 11.8 | 23.5 | 20.6 | 11.8 | 20.6 | 23.5 | 17.6 | 23.5 | 38.2 | 29.4 | 26.5 | 20.6 | 26.5 | 17.6 | 23.5 | 14.7 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 0 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at the time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. An improvement was defined as a decrease(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Data for following organ systems was reported: CNS total, Vascular total, Musculoskeletal total, Renal total, Mucocutaneous total, Cardiovascular (Cardio) and Respiratory (Resp) total, Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Total; Week 4; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 8; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 12; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 16; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 20; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 24; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 26; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 28; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 32; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 36; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 40; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 44; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 48; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 52; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 60; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 64; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 72; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 80; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 88; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 96; n= 2,3,2 | CNS Total; Week 104; n=2,3,2 | Vascular Total; Week 4; n= 6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 8; n= 6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 12; n= 6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 16; n= 6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 20; n=6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 24; n= 6,11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 26; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 28; n= 6, 11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 32; n= 6,11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 36; n= 6, 11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 40; n= 6, 11,0 | Vascular Total; Week 44; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 48; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 52; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 60; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 64; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 72; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 80; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 88; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 96; n= 6, 11, 0 | Vascular Total; Week 104; n= 6, 11, 0 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 4; n= 57, 110, 34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 8; n=57,110, 34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 12; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 16; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 20; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 24; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total;; Week 26; n=57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 28; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 32; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 36; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 40; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 44; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 48; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 52; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 60; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 64; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 72; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 80; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 88; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 96; n= 57,110,34 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 104; n= 57,110,34 | Renal Total; Week 4; n= 14,23,8 | Renal Total; Week 8; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 12; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 16; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 20; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 24; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 26; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 28; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 32; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 36; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 40; n=14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 44; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 48; n=14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 52; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 60; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 64; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 72; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 80; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 88; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 96; n= 14, 23, 8 | Renal Total; Week 104; n= 14, 23, 8 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 4; n= 59, 126,43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 8; n= 59,126,43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 12; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 16; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 20; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 24; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 26; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 28; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 32; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 36; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 40; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 44; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 48; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 52; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 60; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 64; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 72; n=59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 80; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 88; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 96; n= 59, 126, 43 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 104; n= 59, 126, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 4; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 8; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 12; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 16; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 20; n= 3,7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 24; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 26; n=3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 28; n= 3,7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 32; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 36; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 40; n=3,7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 44; n= 3,7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 48; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 52; n= 3, 7, 0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 60; n= 3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 64; n=3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 72; n= 3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 80; n=3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 88; n= 3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 96; n= 3,7,0 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 104; n= 3,7,0 | Immunologic Total; Week 4; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 8; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 12; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 16; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 20; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 24; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 26; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 28; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 32; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 36; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 40; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 44; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 48; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 52; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 60; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 64; n= 48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 72; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 80; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 88; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 96; n=48, 104, 34 | Immunologic Total; Week 104; n=48, 104, 34 | Hematologic Total; Week 4; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 8; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 12; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 16; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 20; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 24; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 26; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 28; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 32; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 36; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 40; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 44; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 48; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 52; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 60; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 64; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 72; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 80; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 88; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 96; n= 8, 19, 3 | Hematologic Total; Week 104; n= 8, 19, 3 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 50.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 22.8 | 40.4 | 36.8 | 42.1 | 47.4 | 42.1 | 43.9 | 49.1 | 54.4 | 61.4 | 54.4 | 50.9 | 57.9 | 59.6 | 54.4 | 56.1 | 47.4 | 47.4 | 57.9 | 50.9 | 47.4 | 21.4 | 50.0 | 28.6 | 35.7 | 57.1 | 35.7 | 28.6 | 21.4 | 35.7 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 42.9 | 64.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 35.7 | 35.7 | 30.5 | 54.2 | 55.9 | 57.6 | 50.8 | 59.3 | 59.3 | 62.7 | 62.7 | 66.1 | 62.7 | 61.0 | 50.8 | 64.4 | 55.9 | 64.4 | 57.6 | 62.7 | 59.3 | 52.5 | 61.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 100 | 100 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 12.5 | 16.7 | 22.9 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 22.9 | 18.8 | 18.8 | 25.0 | 20.8 | 14.6 | 25.0 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 25.0 | 20.8 | 29.2 | 22.9 | 31.3 | 20.8 | 27.1 | 50.0 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 75.0 | 87.5 | 62.5 | 75.0 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 37.5 | 75.0 | 50.0 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 33.3 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 9.1 | 36.4 | 54.5 | 54.5 | 72.7 | 72.7 | 63.6 | 72.7 | 72.7 | 63.6 | 72.7 | 72.7 | 63.6 | 63.6 | 63.6 | 90.9 | 81.8 | 72.7 | 45.5 | 63.6 | 72.7 | 13.6 | 40.0 | 44.5 | 56.4 | 58.2 | 54.5 | 46.4 | 53.6 | 63.6 | 61.8 | 58.2 | 60.0 | 60.9 | 59.1 | 54.5 | 55.5 | 58.2 | 58.2 | 59.1 | 60.9 | 64.5 | 30.4 | 43.5 | 52.2 | 52.2 | 60.9 | 60.9 | 65.2 | 56.5 | 65.2 | 65.2 | 69.6 | 69.6 | 69.6 | 69.6 | 65.2 | 69.6 | 65.2 | 65.2 | 73.9 | 78.3 | 69.6 | 28.6 | 45.2 | 57.1 | 58.7 | 62.7 | 61.9 | 60.3 | 62.7 | 65.1 | 65.9 | 66.7 | 61.1 | 66.7 | 64.3 | 65.1 | 65.9 | 60.3 | 61.9 | 62.7 | 62.7 | 69.0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 10.6 | 17.3 | 24.0 | 30.8 | 36.5 | 34.6 | 39.4 | 34.6 | 40.4 | 41.3 | 44.2 | 39.4 | 41.3 | 37.5 | 45.2 | 43.3 | 36.5 | 31.7 | 29.8 | 33.7 | 40.4 | 42.1 | 63.2 | 52.6 | 63.2 | 57.9 | 52.6 | 36.8 | 57.9 | 57.9 | 63.2 | 52.6 | 57.9 | 63.2 | 52.6 | 57.9 | 68.4 | 47.4 | 52.6 | 57.9 | 52.6 | 63.2 |
SLEDAI-2K assessments consisted of 24 individual items with 9 organ systems. Each item was given a weighted score(1 to 8 with higher score indicating increased activity)and summed if present at time of analysis. SLEDAI-2K score was sum of all 24 individual items from SLEDAI-2K, ranges from 0(no symptoms) to 105(presence of all defined symptoms). Higher scores indicates increased disease activity. A worsening was defined as an increase(compared to Baseline) in SLEDAI-2K score within same organ system at a post-Baseline visit. Baseline value was latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage of participants with SLEDAI-2K organ worsening for following organ systems were reported;CNS total,Vascular total,Musculoskeletal total,Renal total,Mucocutaneous total,Cardio and Resp total,Immunologic total and Hematologic total. Constitutional organ system was removed from analysis and its one item (fever)moved to hematologic organ system. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 26, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Total; Week 4; n= 69, 136, 43 | CNS Total; Week 8; n= 64,132, 42 | CNS Total; Week 12; n= 65, 134, 42 | CNS Total; Week 16; n= 65, 130, 42 | CNS Total; Week 20; n= 63, 128, 42 | CNS Total; Week 24; n= 61, 127, 41 | CNS Total; Week 26; n=61, 116, 38 | CNS Total; Week 28; n=62, 124, 41 | CNS Total; Week 32; n= 61, 124, 41 | CNS Total; Week 36; n=61, 124, 41 | CNS Total; Week 40; n=61, 123, 41 | CNS Total; Week 44; n= 61, 121, 41 | CNS Total; Week 48; n= 58, 120,39 | CNS Total; Week 52; n= 62, 120, 38 | CNS Total; Week 60; n=59, 117, 35 | CNS Total; Week 64; n=60, 117, 34 | CNS Total; Week 72; n= 56, 109, 31 | CNS Total; Week 80; n=55, 111, 35 | CNS Total; Week 88; n= 57, 107, 34 | CNS Total; Week 96; n=52, 107, 33 | CNS Total; Week 104; n= 53, 112, 34 | Vascular Total;Week 4; n= 65, 128, 45 | Vascular Total;Week 8; n= 61, 124, 44 | Vascular Total; Week 12; n= 62, 126, 44 | Vascular Total; Week 16; n=62, 122, 44 | Vascular Total; Week 20; n=60, 120, 44 | Vascular Total; Week 24; n= 59, 119, 43 | Vascular Total; Week 26; n=58, 109, 40 | Vascular Total;Week 28; n= 61, 116, 43 | Vascular Total;Week 32; n=59, 116, 43 | Vascular Total;Week 36; n= 59, 116, 43 | Vascular Total;Week 40; n=59, 115, 43 | Vascular Total;Week 44; n= 59, 113, 43 | Vascular Total;Week 48; n= 57, 112, 40 | Vascular Total;Week 52; n=60, 112, 40 | Vascular Total;Week 60; n= 58, 109, 37 | Vascular Total;Week 64; n=59, 109, 36 | Vascular Total;Week 72; n=55, 101, 33 | Vascular Total;Week 80; n= 54, 104, 37 | Vascular Total;Week 88; n=56, 102, 36 | Vascular Total;Week 96; n=51, 101, 35 | Vascular Total;Week 104; n=53, 105, 36 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 4; n=15, 33, 12 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 8; n= 15, 33, 12 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 12; n= 15, 33, 12 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 16; n= 15, 32, 12 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 20; n= 15, 32, 12 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 24; n= 15, 31, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 26; n= 15, 31, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 28; n= 14, 31, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 32; n= 15, 30, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 36; n= 14, 30, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 40; n=15, 30, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 44; n=15, 29, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 48; n= 14, 30, 10 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 52; n= 15, 30, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 60; n= 14, 28, 11 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 64; n=14, 29, 10 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 72; n= 14, 27, 10 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 80; n= 13, 26, 9 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 88; n= 13, 25, 9 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 96; n= 12, 26, 9 | Musculoskeletal Total; Week 104; n= 13, 27, 9 | Renal Total; Week 4; n= 57, 117, 36 | Renal Total; Week 8; n=51, 110, 36 | Renal Total; Week 12; n=53, 115, 35 | Renal Total; Week 16; n=53, 112, 35 | Renal Total; Week 20; n= 49, 108, 36 | Renal Total; Week 24; n= 49, 111, 35 | Renal Total; Week 26; n= 49, 99, 33 | Renal Total; Week 28; n= 50, 106, 36 | Renal Total; Week 32; n= 50,107, 36 | Renal Total; Week 36; n= 50, 107, 36 | Renal Total; Week 40; n= 47, 106, 34 | Renal Total; Week 44; n= 49, 103, 35 | Renal Total; Week 48; n= 47, 101, 32 | Renal Total; Week 52; n= 49, 103, 32 | Renal Total; Week 60; n=47, 96, 30 | Renal Total; Week 64; n= 50, 99, 29 | Renal Total; Week 72; n= 40, 89, 26 | Renal Total; Week 80; n= 41, 90, 29 | Renal Total; Week 88; n= 44, 85, 29 | Renal Total; Week 96; n= 43, 85, 29 | Renal Total; Week 104; n= 44, 90, 30 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 4; n= 13, 18, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 8; n= 12, 18, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 12; n= 12, 18, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 16; n= 12, 18, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 20; n= 12, 18, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 24; n= 11, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 26; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 28; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 32; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 36; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 40; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 44; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 48; n=10, 16, 3 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 52; n= 10, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 60; n= 9, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 64; n= 10, 16, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 72; n=10, 16, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 80; n= 9, 17, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 88; n= 9, 16, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 96; n= 9, 15, 4 | Mucocutaneous Total; Week 104; n= 9, 17, 4 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 4; n= 68, 132, 45 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 8; n= 63, 128, 44 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 12; n= 64, 130, 44 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 16; n= 64, 126, 44 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 20; n= 63, 124, 44 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 24; n= 60, 123, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 26; n=59, 112, 40 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 28; n= 61, 120, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 32; n= 60, 120, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 36; n= 60, 120, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 40; n=60, 119, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 44; n= 60, 117, 43 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 48; n= 57, 116, 40 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 52; n=61, 116, 40 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 60; n= 58, 114, 37 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 64; n= 59, 114, 36 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 72; n= 55, 106, 33 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 80; n= 54, 107, 37 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 88; n= 56, 104, 36 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 96; n=51, 104, 35 | Cardio and Resp Total; Week 104; n= 52, 109, 36 | Immunologic Total; Week 4; n=23, 37, 13 | Immunologic Total; Week 8; n=20, 37, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 12; n=21, 37,12 | Immunologic Total; Week 16; n= 21, 35, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 20; n= 19, 35, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 24; n= 18, 35, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 26; n= 18, 30, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 28; n= 19, 35, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 32; n= 19, 33, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 36; n= 19, 34, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 40; n= 19, 33, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 44; n= 18, 33, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 48; n= 18, 33, 11 | Immunologic Total; Week 52; n= 19, 32, 12 | Immunologic Total; Week 60; n= 18, 32, 10 | Immunologic Total; Week 64; n= 19, 33, 10 | Immunologic Total; Week 72; n= 17, 28, 9 | Immunologic Total; Week 80; n= 18, 29, 11 | Immunologic Total; Week 88; n= 19, 29, 11 | Immunologic Total; Week 96; n= 16, 30, 11 | Immunologic Total; Week 104; n= 17, 28, 12 | Hematologic Total; Week 4; n= 59, 115, 40 | Hematologic Total; Week 8; n= 52, 109, 38 | Hematologic Total; Week 12; n= 55, 110, 38 | Hematologic Total; Week 16; n=54, 107, 34 | Hematologic Total; Week 20; n= 54, 108, 40 | Hematologic Total; Week 24; n= 53, 111, 37 | Hematologic Total; Week 26; n= 53, 101, 37 | Hematologic Total; Week 28; n= 52, 106, 39 | Hematologic Total; Week 32; n=52, 110, 38 | Hematologic Total; Week 36; n= 53, 109, 40 | Hematologic Total; Week 40; n= 51, 108, 37 | Hematologic Total; Week 44; n=53, 107, 38 | Hematologic Total; Week 48; n=51, 105, 35 | Hematologic Total; Week 52; n= 53, 103, 37 | Hematologic Total; Week 60; n=53, 101, 35 | Hematologic Total; Week 64; n=54, 98, 32 | Hematologic Total; Week 72; n= 47,96, 29 | Hematologic Total; Week 80; n= 45, 94, 35 | Hematologic Total; Week 88; n= 46, 88, 32 | Hematologic Total; Week 96; n= 45, 90, 32 | Hematologic Total; Week 104; n= 46, 94, 32 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.4 | 0 | 0 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 10.6 | 8.2 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 14.6 | 13.6 | 4.7 | 6.8 | 15.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 0 | 25.0 | 18.2 | 20.0 | 0 | 10.0 | 0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | 17.4 | 20.0 | 23.8 | 9.5 | 15.8 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 15.8 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 21.1 | 22.2 | 22.2 | 21.1 | 16.7 | 21.1 | 23.5 | 5.6 | 10.5 | 12.5 | 11.8 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 0 | 5.7 | 0 | 7.5 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 9.4 | 11.1 | 10.6 | 0 | 10.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 1.8 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 0 | 3.4 | 11.1 | 0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 0 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 0 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 11.8 | 0 | 6.3 | 5.9 | 11.8 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0 | 6.3 | 0 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 10.8 | 8.1 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 8.6 | 12.1 | 8.8 | 6.1 | 0 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 13.3 | 17.9 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 6.4 | 10.2 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 9.1 | 4.4 | 6.4 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 2.9 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 0 | 2.9 | 6.3 | 3.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.0 | 0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | 0 | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 16.7 | 8.3 | 16.7 | 8.3 | 0 | 27.3 | 8.3 | 0 | 20.0 | 11.1 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 16.7 | 5.0 | 0 | 10.5 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 10.8 | 5.1 | 7.9 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 0 | 2.7 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 3.4 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 6.3 |
The SLICC-ACR Damage Index measures irreversible (not related to active inflammation) changes occurring since the diagnosis of SLE ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. The questionnaire contains 39 items covering 12 different organ systems which were scored on a numerical scale between 0 (no damage) to 7 (increasing disease damage). Individual ranges for organ systems were; ocular: 0-2, neuropsychiatric: 0-6, renal: 0-3, pulmonary: 0-5, cardiovascular:0-6, peripheral vascular: 0-5, gastrointestinal:0-5, musculoskeletal: 0-6, skin: 0-3, endocrine (diabetes): 0-1, gonadal:0-1 and malignancies: 0-2. The SLICC-ACR score was calculated by taking sum of the individual scores for 12 organ systems which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 45 (increasing disease damage) where higher score indicates increasing disease damage severity. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. (NCT03312907)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 52 and Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 52 | Week 104 | |
Belimumab + Placebo | 1.4 | 5.6 |
Belimumab + Rituximab | 2.1 | 5.6 |
Belimumab + Standard Therapy | 2.1 | 6.4 |
"Mean change from baseline (from baseline to Day 85; or baseline to Day 169) in CLASI activity scores (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF] post censoring values).~The CLASI is a single-page tool that separately quantifies disease activity and damage. For the activity score, points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. The total score represents the sum of the individual scores and ranges from 0 to 70. Higher scores are awarded for more severe manifestations." (NCT02660944)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 29, 57, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, 155, 169
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 85 | Day 169 | |
Placebo | -6.5 | -5.7 |
RSLV-132 | -6.2 | -6.2 |
Percentage of participants achieving a 50% improvement in CLASI activity score at Day 85 and Day 169 (LOCF post censoring due to use of exclusionary medications) (NCT02660944)
Timeframe: Baseline and Days 29, 57, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, 155, 169
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Day 85 | Day 169 All Participants | Day 169 Participants with Severe CLASI >/=21 | Day 169 Participants with Severe SLEDAI >/=9 | |
Placebo | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
RSLV-132 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 4 |
Percentage of participants with a BICLA response on Day 169. This is a composite responder index incorporating the BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K and PGA responses. The BILAG-2004 index, an organ-based transitional activity instrument, provides disease activity scorings across nine organ systems (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatry, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal and hematological) on an ordinal scale (A to E) based on the physician's intention-to-treat premise. Grade A represents the most active and Grade E the least active disease. The PGA is measured on a 0 to 100 mm scale with score 0 to be No Disease Activity and score 100 to be the most Severe Disease Activity. (NCT02660944)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 169
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Day 169 All Participants | Day 169 Participants with Severe CLASI >/=21 | Day 169 Participants with Severe SLEDAI >/=9 | |
Placebo | 4 | 1 | 1 |
RSLV-132 | 10 | 5 | 4 |
Percentage of participants with an Systemic Lupus Erythematous Responder Index (SRI) 4 response on Day 169. This is a composite responder index incorporating the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004, SLEDAI-2K and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) responses. The BILAG-2004 index, an organ-based transitional activity instrument, provides disease activity scorings across nine organ systems (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatry, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal and hematological) on an ordinal scale (A to E) based on the physician's intention-to-treat premise. Grade A represents the most active and Grade E the least active disease. The Physician's Global Assessment is measured on a 0 to 100 mm scale with score 0 to be No Disease Activity and score 100 to be the most Severe Disease Activity. (NCT02660944)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 169
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Day 169 All participants | Day 169 Participants with Severe CLASI >/=21 | Day 169 Participants with Severe SLEDAI >/=9 | |
Placebo | 7 | 1 | 4 |
RSLV-132 | 11 | 7 | 8 |
A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG 2004 assessment. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52
Intervention | Annualized flare rate ratio (Number) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0.15 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.23 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0.13 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0.19 |
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 2 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 3 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -7 |
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | -5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 65 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 87 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 67 |
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | -14 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -19 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -14 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -52 |
Change from baseline in Total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 7 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -70 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -75 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -48 |
Cumulative Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Dose was calculated at Week 52. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Milligrams (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 2267.66 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 2209.46 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 2137.70 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 2205.56 |
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 161 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 184 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 204 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 151 |
Mean total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 150 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 236 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 296 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 229 |
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 169 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 167 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 180 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 119 |
Mean absolute total B cell count were assessed. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte populations using four-color fluorescence activated cell sorting was performed for the analysis of B cell counts. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 56
Intervention | Cells per microliter (Mean) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 164 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 129 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 156 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 104 |
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well(0)-very poor(100). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 21 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 25 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 22 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 25 |
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 43 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 45 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 43 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 41 |
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 18 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 19 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 23 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 15 |
A participant has a flare-free status if no flare has been reported during the 52-week treatment period. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 52, without having a flare are counted as not being flare free at Week 52. A flare was defined as either 1 or more new BILAG-2004 A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B (moderate disease activity) items compared to the previous visit. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: up to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 41 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 35 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 37 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 33 |
BILAG A or 2B flare is defined as at least one BILAG A grade or two BILAG B grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment period. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 19 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 23 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 20 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 21 |
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, weight and height. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 |
12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in 12-lead ECG findings were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 |
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and coagulation. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 |
Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). Clinical SLEDAI-2K score is equal to the SLEDAI-2K score from electronic case report form (eCRF) excluding the components 'Increased Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Binding' and 'Low Complement'. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 42 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 50 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 52 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 41 |
Low disease activity is defined as SLEDAI-2K score <=2. SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 26 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 32 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 39 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 28 |
Lupus low disease activity state will be measured as: SLEDAI-2K <= 4; No activity in any major organ systems (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, fever); No new features of disease activity compared with the previous assessment; Prednisone-equivalent <= 7.5 milligram per day; Unchanged background immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 29 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 32 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 35 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 29 |
BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: [1] At least one gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry (example: all A (severe disease) scores falling to B (moderate), C (mild), or D (no activity) and all B scores falling to C or D; [2] No new BILAG A or more than one new BILAG B scores; [3] No worsening of total SLEDAI-2K score from baseline; [4] No significant deterioration (=<10%) in physician's global assessment and [5] No treatment failure (initiation of non-protocol treatment). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 30 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 29 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 33 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 24 |
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 52 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 64 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 60 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 55 |
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score, no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and no treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 28 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 38 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 29 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 34 |
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale =from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 22 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 27 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 30 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 24 |
SRI-6 response was defined as >= 6-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no new BILAG A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) and treatment failure. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 (no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system :A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from 0(very well) to 100(very poor). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | 17 |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 25 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 23 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 23 |
BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. A Moderate to Severe (BILAG A or 2B) flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (severe disease activity) grade or two BILAG B (moderate disease activity) grade in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52 week treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | NA |
BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. Time to first severe flare, where a severe flare is defined as at least one BILAG A (Severe disease activity) score in any organ system due to items that are new or worse, compared to the BILAG evaluation at the previous visit, during the 52-Week Treatment. It was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
DBPC Period: Placebo | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | NA |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | NA |
BILAG 2004 disease activity Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system based on alphabetic score: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. BILAG evaluated by scoring each of a list of signs and symptoms as: improving (1); same (2); worse (3); new (4); not present (0); not done (ND). Total BILAG score is sum of scores of 9 domains where A=12, B=8, C=1, D=0, and E=0. Total score ranges from 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -4 | -5 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -8 | -8 | -8 | -8 | -9 | -8 | -9 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -4 | -6 | -6 | -6 | -6 | -6 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -7 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -3 | -6 | -6 | -6 | -7 | -8 | -8 | -8 | -8 | -9 | -9 | -9 | -9 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -4 | -6 | -7 | -7 | -7 | -8 | -8 | -9 | -8 | -9 | -9 | -8 | -8 |
CLASI is an validated measurement instrument for lupus erythematosus developed for use in clinical studies that consists of separate scores for the activity of the disease (CLASI-A). The CLASI activity score is calculated on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. Severity categories based on the CLASI activity score are as follows: mild (0-9), moderate (10-20), and severe (21-70). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -1 | -1 | -1 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -4 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 | -1 | -1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 | -1 | -1 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -1 | -1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 |
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. Responses were used to generate a weighted summary index (EQ-5D index), which ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). A higher score indicates better health and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of health. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 24 | Week 32 | Week 40 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.045 | 0.064 | 0.070 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.061 | 0.078 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0.038 | 0.061 | 0.065 | 0.056 | 0.055 | 0.071 | 0.084 | 0.096 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0.036 | 0.046 | 0.055 | 0.067 | 0.086 | 0.075 | 0.090 | 0.102 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0.036 | 0.034 | 0.061 | 0.083 | 0.080 | 0.083 | 0.093 | 0.096 |
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L profile defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has five levels: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems. The responses were used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 was the worst health you can imagine and 100 was the best health you can imagine. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Intervention | Millimeter (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 24 | Week 32 | Week 40 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 10 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 24 | Week 32 | Week 40 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
The Lupus QoL assessment is a 34 item questionnaire across 8 domains that is designed to find out how systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects a participant's life. Domains include physical health, pain, planning, intimate relationships, burden to others, emotional health, body image, and fatigue. Participants indicate their responses on a 5-point Likert response format, where 4=never, 3=occasionally, 2= a good bit of the time, 1=most of the time, and 0=worst of the time. Summary scores can be calculated for all 8 domains. A LupusQoL score for each domain was reported on a 0 to 100 scale, with greater values indicating better health related QoL. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Health Week 4 | Physical Health Week 8 | Physical Health Week 12 | Physical Health Week 16 | Physical Health Week 24 | Physical Health Week 32 | Physical Health Week 40 | Physical Health Week 52 | Pain Week 4 | Pain Week 8 | Pain Week 12 | Pain Week 16 | Pain Week 24 | Pain Week 32 | Pain Week 40 | Pain Week 52 | Planning Week 4 | Planning Week 8 | Planning Week 12 | Planning Week 16 | Planning Week 24 | Planning Week 32 | Planning Week 40 | Planning Week 52 | Intimate Relationship Week 4 | Intimate Relationship Week 8 | Intimate Relationship Week 12 | Intimate Relationship Week 16 | Intimate Relationship Week 24 | Intimate Relationship Week 32 | Intimate Relationship Week 40 | Intimate Relationship Week 52 | Burden to Others Week 4 | Burden to Others Week 8 | Burden to Others Week 12 | Burden to Others Week 16 | Burden to Others Week 24 | Burden to Others Week 32 | Burden to Others Week 40 | Burden to Others Week 52 | Emotional Health Week 4 | Emotional Health Week 8 | Emotional Health Week 12 | Emotional Health Week 16 | Emotional Health Week 24 | Emotional Health Week 32 | Emotional Health Week 40 | Emotional Health Week 52 | Body Image Week 4 | Body Image Week 8 | Body Image Week 12 | Body Image Week 16 | Body Image Week 24 | Body Image Week 32 | Body Image Week 40 | Body Image Week 52 | Fatigue Week 4 | Fatigue Week 8 | Fatigue Week 12 | Fatigue Week 16 | Fatigue Week 24 | Fatigue Week 32 | Fatigue Week 40 | Fatigue Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 4.7 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 6.7 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 10.9 | 12.9 | 4.9 | 8.4 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 6.6 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 9.3 | 6.7 | 8.1 | 9.0 | 6.8 | 12.4 | 10.7 | 4.7 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 10.2 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 4.3 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 4.5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 3.5 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.9 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 5.5 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 8.7 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 8.0 | 10.5 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 8.9 | 2.2 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 5.8 | 8.4 | 12.1 | 10.5 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 6.0 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 4.0 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 9.0 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 6.7 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 4.0 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 11.6 | 9.0 | 7.3 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 13.0 | 12.8 | 15.3 | 14.9 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 11.5 | 9.9 | 11.6 | 9.9 | 4.7 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 8.4 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 11.8 | 9.6 | 12.4 | 13.0 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 7.4 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 7.6 | 8.2 | 2.5 | -1.3 | 2.3 | -0.4 | 5.8 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 4.9 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 11.0 | 11.2 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 1.9 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 7.5 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 6.7 | 11.0 | 10.2 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 9.9 | 3.4 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 8.8 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 12.0 | 7.4 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 11.8 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 16.1 | 15.3 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 11.3 | 8.9 |
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicated no disease activity and 100 represented maximum disease activity. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Intervention | Millimeter (Mean) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -8 | -14 | -18 | -20 | -21 | -24 | -26 | -26 | -26 | -27 | -28 | -29 | -31 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -9 | -14 | -18 | -19 | -20 | -21 | -24 | -26 | -26 | -25 | -26 | -28 | -27 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -9 | -13 | -19 | -21 | -24 | -25 | -26 | -26 | -29 | -30 | -30 | -32 | -33 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -8 | -13 | -18 | -21 | -23 | -24 | -26 | -26 | -26 | -27 | -28 | -29 | -29 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -0.62 | -0.02 | -0.20 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.93 | -0.03 | -0.20 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -0.72 | 0.06 | -0.18 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -0.36 | 0.00 | -0.01 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -0.06 | -0.04 | -0.05 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.40 | -0.03 | -0.07 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -0.15 | -0.01 | -0.04 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -0.51 | -0.11 | 0.00 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.11 | 0.14 | -0.23 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.57 | 0.04 | -0.25 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -0.46 | 0.19 | -0.23 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -0.21 | 0.06 | -0.01 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.02 | 0.22 | -0.25 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.69 | 0.08 | -0.28 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -0.43 | 0.24 | -0.25 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -0.15 | -0.02 | -0.04 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -0.16 | -0.04 | -0.09 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.45 | -0.03 | -0.08 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | -0.24 | 0.03 | -0.07 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -0.26 | -0.01 | 0.01 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.29 | 0.32 | -0.25 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.31 | 0.18 | -0.33 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.21 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0.41 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Change from baseline in the serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 1.06 | 0.48 | -0.15 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -0.40 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0.74 | 0.35 | -0.11 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0.74 | 0.23 | 0.01 |
The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) was based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 - 100 (100 = highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100 = highest level of physical functioning). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Component Summary Score at Week 4 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 8 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 12 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 16 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 32 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 40 | Physical Component Summary Score at Week 52 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 4 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 8 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 12 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 16 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 24 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 32 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 40 | Mental Component Summary Score at Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 3.5 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.9 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.8 |
SLEDAI-2K is an activity index that measures disease activity and records feature of active lupus as present or not present. SLEDAI-2K uses a weighted checklist to assign a numerical score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 30 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms). (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | -1 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -5 | -5 | -5 | -5 | -5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | -1 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -4 | -3 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -5 | -5 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -5 | -5 | -5 | -5 | -5 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | -1 | -2 | -3 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -5 | -4 | -4 | -5 |
Change From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent CS Daily Dose at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Intervention | Milligram (mg) (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week 10 | Week 12 | Week 14 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 32 | Week 36 | Week 40 | Week 44 | Week 48 | Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0.00 | -0.07 | -0.45 | -0.64 | -1.24 | -2.04 | -1.85 | -2.70 | -2.70 | -2.82 | -2.64 | -2.97 | -3.13 | -3.31 | -3.21 | -3.21 | -3.22 | -2.94 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0.00 | -0.13 | -0.15 | -0.70 | -1.02 | -2.50 | -1.97 | -2.76 | -2.40 | -2.53 | -2.34 | -2.46 | -2.44 | -2.37 | -2.67 | -2.56 | -2.62 | -2.63 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.04 | -0.59 | -1.09 | -1.56 | -1.73 | -1.87 | -2.47 | -2.64 | -2.61 | -3.07 | -3.18 | -3.18 | -3.24 | -3.27 | -3.37 | -3.09 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.01 | -1.07 | -0.57 | -1.43 | -1.26 | -2.00 | -1.67 | -1.94 | -1.99 | -2.23 | -2.45 | -2.42 | -2.08 | -2.42 | -2.38 | -1.70 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 12. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG: | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 12.92 | 2.73 | 1.05 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 12.38 | 2.68 | 1.02 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 13.64 | 2.88 | 0.95 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14.91 | 2.72 | 1.11 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 2. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 2
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13.75 | 2.75 | 1.22 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 12.81 | 2.66 | 1.18 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 14.37 | 2.78 | 1.09 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14.56 | 2.62 | 1.12 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 24. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13.75 | 2.89 | 1.01 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 12.86 | 2.78 | 0.98 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 13.79 | 2.98 | 0.89 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 15.01 | 2.79 | 1.07 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 36. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 36
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13.54 | 2.89 | 1.01 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 12.65 | 2.86 | 0.95 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 13.67 | 3.01 | 0.85 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14.81 | 2.72 | 1.06 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 4. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13.60 | 2.73 | 1.18 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 12.73 | 2.64 | 1.16 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 14.21 | 2.82 | 1.06 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14.92 | 2.71 | 1.12 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 52 (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13.90 | 2.95 | 0.94 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 13.01 | 2.95 | 0.96 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 14.32 | 3.17 | 0.82 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 15.21 | 2.82 | 1.08 |
Mean absolute value of serum levels of IgG, IgA, IgM were assessed at Week 56 (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 56
Intervention | gram per liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgG | IgA | IgM | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 14.25 | 3.01 | 1.01 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 13.12 | 3.03 | 1.31 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 14.25 | 2.89 | 0.95 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14.82 | 2.95 | 1.11 |
Number of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in Prednisone-equivalent Corticosteroid (CS) Daily Dose by > 0 to 25%, >25% to 50%, >50% to 100% or an Increase at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52 were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 1 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 2 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 4 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 6 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 8 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 10 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 12 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 14 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 16 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 20 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 24 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 28 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 32 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 36 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 40 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 44 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 48 | Reduction of dose by >0-25% Week 52 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 1 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 2 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 4 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 6 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 8 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 10 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 12 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 14 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 16 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 20 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 24 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 28 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 32 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 36 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 40 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 44 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 48 | Reduction of dose by >25- 50% Week 52 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 1 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 2 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 4 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 6 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 8 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 10 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 12 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 14 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 16 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 20 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 24 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 28 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 32 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 36 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 40 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 44 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 48 | Reduction of dose by >50-100% Week 52 | Increased from Baseline Week 1 | Increased from Baseline Week 2 | Increased from Baseline Week 4 | Increased from Baseline Week 6 | Increased from Baseline Week 8 | Increased from Baseline Week 10 | Increased from Baseline Week 12 | Increased from Baseline Week 14 | Increased from Baseline Week 16 | Increased from Baseline Week 20 | Increased from Baseline Week 24 | Increased from Baseline Week 28 | Increased from Baseline Week 32 | Increased from Baseline Week 36 | Increased from Baseline Week 40 | Increased from Baseline Week 44 | Increased from Baseline Week 48 | Increased from Baseline Week 52 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 8 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 16 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs: events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment/that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 56 weeks. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Any TEAEs | Any serious TEAE | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 103 | 13 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 99 | 9 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 100 | 11 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 96 | 10 |
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | |
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 80 | 77 | 29 | 1 | 1 |
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 76 | 78 | 21 | 2 | 0 |
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 79 | 72 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
DBPC Period: Placebo | 76 | 63 | 24 | 1 | 0 |
The PGIC is a self-rated scale that asks the participant to describe the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life (QoL) related to the participants painful condition on the following scale: 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in the PGIC categories of any improvement (that is PGIC scale score 1, 2 or 3), no change (that is PGIC scale score 4) and any worsening (that is PGIC scale score 5, 6 or 7) are reported. (NCT02975336)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 472538922 | Week 472538923 | Week 472538925 | Week 472538924 | Week 872538923 | Week 872538924 | Week 872538922 | Week 872538925 | Week 1272538922 | Week 1272538923 | Week 1272538924 | Week 1272538925 | Week 1672538922 | Week 1672538923 | Week 1672538925 | Week 1672538924 | Week 2472538922 | Week 2472538923 | Week 2472538924 | Week 2472538925 | Week 3272538922 | Week 3272538923 | Week 3272538925 | Week 3272538924 | Week 4072538922 | Week 4072538923 | Week 4072538925 | Week 4072538924 | Week 5272538922 | Week 5272538923 | Week 5272538924 | Week 5272538925 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Missing | Any Improvement | No Change | Any Worsening | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 50 mg BID | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: Placebo | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 25 mg QD | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DBPC Period: M2951 75 mg QD | 3 |
The erythema score is lesion-specific and based on the CLASI and the RCLASI which are validated scoring systems to assess disease activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The severity of the erythema is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The severity is scored from low to high with 0=absent and 3=dark red, purple/violaceous/crusted/haemorrhagic. (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 6
Intervention | scores on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 1.5 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 1.5 |
Number of AEs from baseline to Week 6 (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 6
Intervention | AEs (Number) |
---|---|
All Subjects | 8 |
The number of lesion-specific, treatment-related AEs per target lesion will be compared for active and vehicle treatment. Lesion-specific AEs are defined as lesional/perilesional AEs (i.e. AE location within the treatment area and/or ≤2 cm from the border of a target lesion). (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 6
Intervention | AEs (Number) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 2 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 0 |
The erythema score is lesion-specific and based on the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) and the Revised CLASI (RCLASI) which are validated scoring systems to assess disease activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The severity of the erythema is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The severity is scored from low to high with 0=absent and 3=dark red, purple/violaceous/crusted/haemorrhagic. (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 6
Intervention | lesions (Number) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 5 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 5 |
The IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global disease and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). In this trial, the IGA was a lesion-specific assessment and was evaluated separately for each of the 2 target lesions. (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 6
Intervention | lesions (Number) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 3 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 6 |
Number of subjects with AEs from baseline to Week 6 (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 6
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
All Subjects | 8 |
The IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global disease and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). In this trial, the IGA was a lesion-specific assessment and was evaluated separately for each of the 2 target lesions. (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 6
Intervention | lesions (Number) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 3 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 6 |
The skin disease activity scores are based on the CLASI and the RCLASI which are validated scoring systems to assess disease activity and damage in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The total skin disease activity score is defined as the sum of the scores for 3 clinical signs (erythema, scaling/hyperkeratosis, oedema/infiltration) for each target lesion. For the total score and the individual clinical signs, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Erythema is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red, purple/violaceous/crusted/haemorrhagic). Hyperkeratosis/scaling is scored on a 3-point scale from 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous hyperkeratosis). Oedema/infiltration is scored on a 3-point scale from 0 (absent) to 2 (palpable and visible). The total skin disease activity score can therefore range from 0 to 7. (NCT03958955)
Timeframe: Week 6
Intervention | scores on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g | 2.5 |
Delgocitinib Cream Vehicle | 2.5 |
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from Baseline in safety of estrogen in lupus national assessment (SELENA) systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score, no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from Baseline) in physician's global assessment (PGA) and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group of SLE clinics (BILAG) A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model for the comparison between belimumab and placebo with covariates treatment group, Baseline SELENA SLEDAI score (<=9 vs. >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and race (black vs. other). (NCT01484496)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of par. (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo SC | 48.4 |
Belimumab 200 mg SC | 61.4 |
For the analysis of steroid use, all steroid dosages were converted to a prednisone equivalent in mg. The average daily prednisone dose was calculated taking into account all steroids taken intravenously, intramuscularly, SC, intradermally and orally for both SLE and non-SLE reasons. A responder was defined as having a prednisone reduction by >=25% from Baseline to <=7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40 through 52. At Baseline, the average daily prednisone dose was the sum of all prednisone doses over 7 consecutive days up to, but not including Day 0, divided by 7. For this analysis, the average prednisone dose was the total prednisone dose during weeks 40 through 52 divided by the number of days during Weeks 40 through 52. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with covariates treatment group, Baseline prednisone dose, Baseline SELENA SLEDAI score, (<=9 vs >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and race (black vs. other). (NCT01484496)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0, prior to dosing), Weeks 40 through Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of par. (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo SC | 11.9 |
Belimumab 200 mg SC | 18.2 |
Time to first severe SLE flare is defined as the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event (event date - treatment start date +1). Analyses of severe SLE flare was performed on modified SELENA SLEDAI SLE flare index that excludes severe flares that were triggered only by an increase in SELENA SLEDAI score to >12 (since this may only represent a modest increase in disease activity). Only post-baseline severe flares were considered. (NCT01484496)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0, prior to dosing) to Week 52
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo SC | 118 |
Belimumab 200 mg SC | 171 |
FACIT-Fatigue score calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status. Least Squares (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >= 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South, America/Mexico, Europe, Asia Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.26 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 6.90 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 6.96 |
The number of swollen joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South America/Mexico, Europe, Asia and Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | swollen joint count (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -4.79 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -5.10 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -5.31 |
The number of tender and painful joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South America/Mexico, Europe, Asia and Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | tender joint count (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -6.92 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -7.40 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -7.83 |
Participants assessed the worst pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The average worst daily pain score was calculated as the mean of the scores over the last 7 days prior to each assessment time point. Higher score indicated severe pain. Least Squares (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >= 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South, America/Mexico, Europe, Asia Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.37 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -1.45 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -1.44 |
"The LLDAS is a composite measure designed to identify patients achieving a state of low disease activity. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) SLEDAI-2K <=4, with no activity in major organ systems (CNS, vascular, renal, cardiorespiratory and constitutional); where no activity is defined as all items of SLEDAI-2K within these major organ systems equal to 0. (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared to previous occurred visit, where the new feature is defined as any of the SLEDAI-2K 24 items changed from 0 to greater than 0; (3) PGA (scale 0-3), <=1; (4) current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose <=7.5 mg daily." (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 23.2 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 24.0 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 25.4 |
"SRI-4 response defined as 1)greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score 2)no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and 3)no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity (worsening defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale).~SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease,B=moderate disease,C=mild stable disease,D=inactive,but previously active,E=inactive and never affected. PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 3 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe)." (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 45.6 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 47.1 |
"SRI-4 response defined as 1)greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score 2)no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and 3)no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity (worsening defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale).~SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease,B=moderate disease,C=mild stable disease,D=inactive,but previously active,E=inactive and never affected. PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 3 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe)." (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 45.6 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 46.3 |
For the analysis of steroid use, steroid dosages were converted to a prednisone equivalent in mg. A responder was defined as having a prednisone reduction by >=25% from Baseline to <=7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40 through 52. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40 through Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 31.7 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 29.8 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 34.3 |
The CLASI is a single-page tool that separately quantifies disease activity and damage. For the activity score, points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. The total score represents the sum of the individual scores and ranges from 0 to 70. Higher scores are awarded for more severe manifestations. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 66.1 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 56.9 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 58.0 |
AUCtau,ss reported for participants who received multiple doses of mg baricitinib was derived by a population pharmacokinetics approach. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Baseline): 15 minutes (min) and 60 min postdose; Week 4: 2 to 4 hours (hr) postdose; Week 8: 4 to 6 hr postdose; Week 12 and Week 16 predose
Intervention | nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 257 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 505 |
PK: Maximum Concentration of Baricitinib at steady-state (Cmax,ss) was derived by a population pharmacokinetics approach. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Baseline): 15 minutes (min) and 60 min postdose; Week 4: 2 to 4 hours (hr) postdose; Week 8: 4 to 6 hr postdose; Week 12 and Week 16 predose
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 27.0 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 54.1 |
Time to first severe flare analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group, baseline disease activity [Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) <10; SLEDAI-2K ≥10], baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; ≥10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), and region fitted as explanatory variables. Participants who did not have severe flare during the flare exposure time period were censored at the end of the flare exposure time. (NCT03616964)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | NA |
2 mg Baricitinib | NA |
4 mg Baricitinib | NA |
A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment. (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Annualized flare rate ratio (Number) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 0.62 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 0.60 |
Placebo | 0.72 |
PHQ-8 is a 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. PHQ-8 assesses symptoms of depression over the previous 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Score on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | -2.1 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | -2.7 |
Placebo | -1.7 |
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 80 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 161 |
Placebo | 145 |
"An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor/Sponsor's delegate. An AESI may be serious or nonserious. The events of interest are serious infections, including non opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, TB (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-SLE), and MACE (including stroke, MI, or cardiovascular death).~AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 11 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 23 |
Placebo | 18 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS) No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 35 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 65 |
Placebo | 74 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc allowed threshold.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 45 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 84 |
Placebo | 79 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified threshold." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 34 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 74 |
Placebo | 75 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc allowed threshold.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 40 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 83 |
Placebo | 79 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B No worsening from baseline in participants lupus disease activity. Worsening was defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 30 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 53 |
Placebo | 59 |
"SRI(4) was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in the SLEDAI-2K No new organ systems affected, defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 2 or more BILAG-2004 B items No worsening from baseline in lupus disease activity. Worsening defined as an increase of ≥0.30 points on a 3-point PGA VAS No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 40 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 71 |
Placebo | 63 |
"Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all the following criteria:~Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 17 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 42 |
Placebo | 33 |
"Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40 Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52 No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medication confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 24 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 50 |
Placebo | 33 |
"A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met:~All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus:~Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 27 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 67 |
Placebo | 49 |
"A BICLA responder was achieved if all of the following criteria was met:~All criteria related to SRI(4) (please see primary endpoint) plus:~Reduction of all baseline BILAG-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by 1 or more BILAG-2004 A or 1 or more new BILAG-2004 B item No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medications confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 35 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 83 |
Placebo | 54 |
"50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the pre-specified analysis threshold before assessment." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 15 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 24 |
Placebo | 14 |
"50% reduction in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all the following criteria:~Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline No discontinuation of investigational product and no use of restricted medications beyond the revised post-hoc analysis threshold before assessment.~Revised rules were designed to be more clinically appropriate, capture intent of protocol, minimize the risk of restricted medication confounding efficacy, and to allow appropriate quantification and interpretation of the relevant endpoints." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 16 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 25 |
Placebo | 14 |
ECGs documented the date, time, heart rate, QRS duration, PR interval, RR interval, QT, and corrected QT interval, which were calculated using the Fridericia formula. The investigator judged the overall interpretation as normal or abnormal, and if abnormal it was decided as to whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant or not clinically significant. (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
Laboratory tests were collected at central clinical laboratories and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests. Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 44 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 71 |
Placebo | 87 |
"Physical examinations included height and weight. Participants were weighed at each study visit and any medically significant changes were reported.~Physical examination values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 3 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 2 |
Placebo | 2 |
"Vital signs included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate.~Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 14 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 36 |
Placebo | 46 |
"The modified SELENA flare index was completed by the Investigator or delegated/qualified physician. Assessment of flares were scored in comparison to the participant's previous visit and should only include findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator, are due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity within that timeframe. Flare was defined as any 1 criterion present in either the Mild/Moderate Flare or Severe Flare categories.~Number of flares were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Trial (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 38 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 58 |
Placebo | 67 |
"The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior was defined as the number of participants who answered yes at any time during the treatment period (Baseline to Week 52) to one of the 10 categories:~Category 1: Wish to be dead Category 2: Non-specific active suicidal thoughts Category 3: Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act Category 4: Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan Category 5: Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent Category 6: Preparatory acts or behavior Category 7: Aborted attempt Category 8: Interrupted attempt Category 9: Actual attempt (non-fatal) Category 10: Completed suicide" (NCT02446912)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Suicidal ideation | Suicidal behaviour | |
Anifrolumab 150 mg | 1 | 0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 2 | 0 |
Placebo | 2 | 1 |
A flare was defined as either 1 or more new British Isle Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG-2004) A or 2 or more new BILAG-2004 B items compared to the previous visit. The occurrence of a new flare was checked for each available visit versus the previous available visit up to Week 52. If no new flares occurred, the number of flares was set to 0. Otherwise all flares were counted leading to the maximum number of flares of 13. The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied with 365.25 (1 year). The flare exposure time is the time up to Week 52 (date of BILAG-2004 assessment at Week 52) or up to the date of last available BILAG-2004 assessment. (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | Annualized flare rate ratio (Number) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 0.43 |
Placebo | 0.64 |
"Maintained OCS reduction was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Achieve an OCS dose of ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by Week 40~Maintain an OCS dose ≤7.5 mg/day prednisone or equivalent from Week 40 to Week 52~No discontinuation of investigational product~No use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Week 40; Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 45 |
Placebo | 25 |
"Composite endpoint BICLA was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction of all baseline British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by ≥1 new BILAG-2004 A or ≥2 new BILAG-2004 B~No worsening from baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), where worsening is defined as an increase from baseline of >0 points in SLEDAI-2K~No worsening from baseline in participants' lupus disease activity, where worsening is defined by an increase ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS)~No discontinuation of investigational product~No use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 86 |
Placebo | 57 |
"Defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Reduction of all baseline British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 A to B/C/D and baseline BILAG-2004 B to C/D, and no BILAG-2004 worsening in other organ systems, as defined by ≥1 new BILAG-2004 A or ≥2 new BILAG-2004 B~No worsening from baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), where worsening is defined as an increase from baseline to >0 points in SLEDAI-2K~No worsening from baseline in participants' lupus disease activity, where worsening is defined by an increase ≥0.30 points on a 3-point Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue scale (VAS)~No discontinuation of investigational product~No use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 72 |
Placebo | 46 |
"50% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Achieve ≥50% reduction from baseline in the number of swollen and tender joints, separately~No discontinuation of investigational product~No use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 30 |
Placebo | 34 |
"50% reduction in CLASI activity score compared to baseline was defined by meeting all of the following criteria:~Achieve ≥50% reduction of CLASI activity score at Week 12 compared to baseline~No discontinuation of investigational product~No use of restricted medications beyond the protocol allowed threshold before assessment" (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 24 |
Placebo | 10 |
"Clinical laboratory tests were analyzed in a central clinical laboratory and included hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis tests.~Laboratory values were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 72 |
Placebo | 87 |
"Vital sign measurements included oral temperature, blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, and respiratory rate.~Vital signs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 45 |
Placebo | 45 |
An AE is the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered causally related to the product. AEs were collected throughout the duration of the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE). The reported value is inclusive of serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 162 |
Placebo | 154 |
"An AESI is an adverse event (AE) of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics. An AESI may be serious or non-serious. AESI are serious infections, including non-opportunistic serious infections, opportunistic infections, anaphylaxis, malignancy, herpes zoster, tuberculosis (TB) (including latent TB), influenza, vasculitis (non-systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (including stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], or cardiovascular death).~AESIs were collected throughout the study, from baseline until end of follow-up (a maximum of 12 weeks post last dose [Week 48]), or until Week 52 for participants who enrolled onto the long term extension (LTE)." (NCT02446899)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Maximum of 60 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 29 |
Placebo | 20 |
"The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity is a single-item, patient reported scale developed for the assessment of the patient's overall rating of their disease activity due to SLE. The scale measures disease activity through a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0 (No disease activity) to 4 (Severe disease activity) at its worst over the past 7 days. LS mean was determined by MMRM model with baseline of response, region, baseline disease activity (SLEDAI-2K <10, >=10), baseline anti-dsDNA status (positive, negative), treatment, time, treatment*time (type III sum of squares)." (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.67 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -0.83 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -1.00 |
SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score is a weighted, cumulative index of lupus disease activity. SLEDAI-2K is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems; 0 indicates inactive disease and the maximum theoretical score is 105. Least Squares (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) model with baseline of response, region, baseline disease activity (SLEDAI-2K <10, >=10), baseline anti-dsDNA status (positive, negative), treatment, time, treatment*time (type III sum of squares). (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -3.82 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -4.07 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -4.39 |
Participants were defined as responder as follows using SLEDAI-2K definitions of arthritis and rash. If only arthritis is present at baseline, then arthritis must be absent at Week 24 to meet the primary endpoint. If only rash is present at baseline, then rash must be absent at Week 24 to meet the primary endpoint. If both arthritis and rash are present at baseline, then the primary endpoint is met if either arthritis, or rash, or both arthritis and rash are absent at Week 24. (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 53.3 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 58.1 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 67.3 |
SRI-4 response is defined as: 1) Reduction of ≥4 points from baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score; 2) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or no more than 1 new BILAG B disease activity scores; and 3) no worsening (defined as an increase of ≥0.3 points [10 mm] from baseline) in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. The SRI-4 is a composite index used to assess disease activity in SLE. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 to 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. PGA is a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 47.6 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 51.4 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 64.4 |
Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were obtained in week 0, week 4, week 8, week 16 and 24. AUC takes all time points post dose into account and one value is reported. (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Week (Wk) 0: 15-30 minutes (min) postdose; Wk 4: Predose, 1.5 - 4 hour (hr) postdose; Wk 8: 1 - 3 hr postdose; Wk 16: Predose
Intervention | nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 265 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 569 |
Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were obtained in week 0, week 4, week 8, week 16 and 24. Cmax takes all time points post dose into account and one value is reported. (NCT02708095)
Timeframe: Week (Wk) 0: 15-30 minutes (min) postdose; Wk 4: Predose, 1.5 - 4 hour (hr) postdose; Wk 8: 1 - 3 hr postdose; Wk 16: Predose
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 29.0 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 59.2 |
SRI-4 response:>=4-point reduction in SLEDAI-2K total score, no British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (<10 % increase)from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment(PGA).SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems,higher scores=more severe disease activity.Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10). (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 56.0 |
Ustekinumab | 43.9 |
Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as a reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to the baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to the baseline dose) so that the average daily dose was reduced to less than or equal to (<=) 7.5 milligram (mg) (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who, at baseline, were receiving oral glucocorticoids. (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 29.3 |
Ustekinumab | 44.3 |
Percentage of participants with reduction in glucocorticoid dose by Week 40, its sustenance through Week 52, and SRI 4 composite response at Week 52 were reported. Reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as reduction in average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 50% (relative to baseline dose) or reduction of average daily oral glucocorticoid dose by at least 25% (relative to baseline dose) so that average daily dose is reduced to <=7.5 mg (prednisone or equivalent). Sustained reduction of glucocorticoid dose was defined as achieving an average daily oral glucocorticoid dose reduction between Weeks 24 and 40, and sustaining that reduction through Week 52, in those participants who,at baseline,were receiving oral glucocorticoids. SRI-4 was defined as composite of at least 4-point improvement in SLEDAI-2K score of 0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms with higher scores representing increased disease activity),no worsening in BILAG and no worsening in PGA. (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 23.9 |
Ustekinumab | 30.0 |
The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in number of joints with pain and signs of inflammation at Week 52 for participants with at least 4 joints with pain and signs of inflammation at baseline were reported. (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 66.3 |
Ustekinumab | 64.7 |
SRI-4 response:>=4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no BILAG A (severe disease) and no more than 1 new BILAG B (moderate disease) domain score and no worsening (<10 % increase)from baseline in PGA.SLEDAI measures disease activity in 9 organ systems, higher scores=more severe disease activity. Each organ system measured as either absent/present within last 30 days and weighted score across systems was utilized to calculate total SLEDAI score(range:0=no symptoms to 105=presence of all defined symptoms). Improvement is defined as reduction in SLEDAI score (BILAG) Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to SLE,divided into 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. PGA assesses disease activity on visual analogue scale from very well(0)-very poor(10). (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 56 |
Ustekinumab | 45.7 |
Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% improvement in CLASI activity score at Week 52 reported in participants with a CLASI activity score of 4 or greater at baseline. The CLASI is an instrument to assess the disease activity and damage caused to the skin for cutaneous lupus erythematosus participants with or without systemic involvement. The CLASI activity score ranges from 0-70 with lower score being improved. Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss, and non-scarring alopecia. (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 55.9 |
Ustekinumab | 40.7 |
Time to flare is defined as the time (in days) post baseline when the first flare occurs. It was calculated with flare defined as either 1 or more BILAG A (severe disease activity) or 2 or more new BILAG B (moderate disease activity) domain scores relative to baseline. BILAG was defined as a measure of alterations or intensification to therapy consisting of 97 questions in 9 domains. Each domain can range from A=new domain activity, B=worse domain activity, C=same domain activity, D=improving domain activity to E=absence of domain activity. BILAG A flare was defined as at least 1 new BILAG A scores. BILAG B flare was defined as at least 2 new BILAG B scores. (NCT03517722)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | days (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Time to First BILAG Flare | Time to First BILAG A Flare | Time to First BILAG B Flare | |
Placebo to Ustekinumab | 200.4 | 201.4 | 218.1 |
Ustekinumab | 204.7 | 203.1 | 208.7 |
Participants' current use of steroid therapy was assessed at each study visit, and the amount of daily prednisone was documented. (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | mg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | -0.65 |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | -0.45 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | -0.62 |
BICLA is a composite responder index. Achievement of BICLA response is defined as improvement in all initial A and B BILAG scores, with no more than one new BILAG B score without worsening of the overall condition (no worsening in Physician's Global Assessment [PhGA], < 0.3 point increase) and no worsening of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score. (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | 42.7 |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | 54.4 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | 58.1 |
LLDAS is a state of low disease activity based on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score (SLEDAI-2K score ≤4 excluding SLEDAI-2K activity in major organ systems), absence of SLE disease activity in major organ systems and new disease activity, Physician's Global Assessment (PhGA ≤1), and concomitant medication usage (steroid dose ≤7.5 mg QD and toleration of immunosuppressive drugs at standard maintenance doses). (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | 13.3 |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | 30.9 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | 45.2 |
"SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 is defined as follows with all criteria compared to Baseline:~≥ 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score~No worsening of the overall condition (< 0.3 point increase in Physician's Global Assessment [PhGA])~No new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or more than 1 new BILAG B disease activity scores (i.e., no organ system changes from baseline B/C/D/E to A and no more than 1 organ system changes from baseline C/D/E to B). A letter score is assigned to each organ system with following indications: A = severe, B = moderate, C = mild, D = inactive with prior history, and E = inactive with no history." (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | 37.3 |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | 48.5 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | 54.8 |
"SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 is defined as follows with all criteria compared to Baseline:~≥ 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score~No worsening of the overall condition (< 0.3 point increase in Physician's Global Assessment [PhGA])~No new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A or more than 1 new BILAG B disease activity scores (i.e., no organ system changes from baseline B/C/D/E to A and no more than 1 organ system changes from baseline C/D/E to B). A letter score is assigned to each organ system with following indications: A = severe, B = moderate, C = mild, D = inactive with prior history, and E = inactive with no history." (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | 38.7 |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | 54.4 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | 56.5 |
The SELENA SLEDAI flare index defines mild/moderate or severe SLE flares using the SLEDAI score, definitions of worsening signs and symptoms, treatment changes, and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. (NCT03978520)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Events per patient-year (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mild/Moderate | Severe | Overall | |
ABBV-599 High Dose (Elsubrutinib 60 mg/Upadacitinib 30 mg) | 1.39 | 0.26 | 1.65 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib 30 mg | 1.76 | 0.10 | 1.87 |
Elsubrutinib Placebo/Upadacitinib Placebo | 2.45 | 0.36 | 2.81 |
CLASI-50 Response is defined as a 50% improvement from baseline in CLASI-A score at Week 24. The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 42.11 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 50 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 16.67 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 64.10 |
An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). The 28 Joint Count includes assessment of swelling and tenderness in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints and knees. The investigator counts how many of the 28 joints are swollen or tender at the given week. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | joints (Mean) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | -12.7 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | -9.0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -13.0 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | -14.5 |
The PGA is used to quantify disease activity and is measured using an anchored VAS. The PGA asks the Investigator to assess the participants current disease activity from a score of 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher score means severe SLE disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | -2.46 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | -2.05 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -0.12 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | -2.45 |
The SLEDAI-2K is a reliable, valid, simple, 1-page activity index that measures disease activity and records features of active lupus as present or not. It uses a weighted checklist to assign a numeric score based on the presence or absence of 24 symptoms at the time of assessment or during the previous 28 days. Each symptom present is assigned between 1 and up to 8 points based on its usual clinical importance, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 points (no symptoms) to 105 points (presence of all defined symptoms), where higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | -2.1 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | -3.0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -1.3 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | -4.4 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 1 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 5 |
An SRI-4 at Week 24 was a categorical response variable (Yes/No) incorporating the following criteria for achievement of responder status (i.e., all criteria must have been met to achieve responder status): A reduction from baseline of ≥4 points in SLEDAI-2K, No new organ system affected, as defined by no new BILAG-2004 Grade A and no more than 1 new BILAG-2004 Grade B, No worsening from baseline in participant's lupus disease activity, defined by a <1-point increase in the PGA (VAS) [on a scale of 0 to 10],No changes to protocol-specified medication rules,as follows (all criteria were required to be met): No initiation or increase of SLE standard of care therapy or other disallowed concomitant therapy; Concomitant corticosteroid dosage at Week 24 to be ≤10 mg/day;Concomitant corticosteroid dosage at Week 24 was no more than at Day 1;No increase in corticosteroid dose between Weeks 17 and 24. The percentage of participants who had responded to each of the 4 criteria was also reported. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 28.57 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 33.33 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 16.67 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 56.25 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. The percentage of participants with a >=4-point reduction from baseline in CLASI-A score are reported here. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 57.89 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 83.66 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 16.67 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 71.79 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. The percentage of participants with a >=7-point reduction from baseline in CLASI-A score are reported here. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 34.21 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 66.67 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 16.67 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 56.41 |
No new organ system affected, as defined by no new British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG)-2004 A and no more than one new BILAG-2004 B. The BILAG-2004 index categorizes disease activity in each organ system into five different levels from A to E. Grade A represents very active disease, Grade B represents moderate disease activity, Grade C indicates mild stable disease, and grade D implies no disease activity, but suggests the organ system had previously been affected. Grade E indicates no current or previous disease activity. A score is applied to each grade of each organ system using coding scheme of A=12, B=8, C=1, and D/E=0 and is summarized as a total score ranging 0-108. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Part A: Placebo | 82.14 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 100.00 |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 50.00 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 85.94 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 0 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | 0 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 5 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 4 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 5 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | -10.73 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | -38.72 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | -47.82 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | -35.25 |
The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Part B: Placebo | -15.03 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | -35.52 |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | -47.11 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | -41.66 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin titers for tetanus and diphtheria were analyzed using international units per milliliter (IU/mL). (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | IU/mL (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
C. tetani IgG Antibody: Baseline | C. tetani IgG Antibody: Change at Week 24 | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Baseline | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 2.52 | 1.07 | 0.17 | 0.07 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 3.30 | -0.70 | 0.33 | -0.07 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 1.73 | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.03 |
Part A: Placebo | 2.46 | -0.07 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin (Ig) titers for Pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae) were analyzed, including 23 types of serotypes (sero). AB = Antibody. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | milligrams per liter (mg/L) (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sero 1 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 1 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 2 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 2 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 3 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 3 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 4 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 4 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 5 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 5 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 6 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 6 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 7 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 7 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 8 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 8 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 9N IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9N IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 9V IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9V IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 10A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 10A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 11A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 11A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 12F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 12F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 14 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 14 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 15B IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 15B IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 17F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 17F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 18C IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 18C IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 19A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 19F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 20 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 20 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 22F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 22F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 23F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 23F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 33F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 33F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 2.705 | -0.565 | 4.202 | -1.975 | 1.2733 | -0.2067 | 1.317 | -0.795 | 13.507 | -7.322 | 4.458 | -3.083 | 7.0033 | -2.8917 | 2.6183 | -1.5483 | 2.810 | -0.907 | 1.5900 | -0.5750 | 14.040 | 0.100 | 4.095 | -0.782 | 2.077 | -1.220 | 8.167 | -0.798 | 4.332 | -1.607 | 11.952 | -5.898 | 2.980 | -0.915 | 50.3175 | -29.3558 | 8.353 | -3.673 | 21.8742 | -13.0942 | 5.525 | -3.657 | 0.685 | 0.190 | 5.630 | -3.740 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 1.495 | 0.475 | 1.626 | -0.011 | 1.6579 | 0.8122 | 0.429 | 0.060 | 4.442 | 0.329 | 1.957 | 0.070 | 3.0983 | 0.3053 | 1.5890 | 0.1281 | 2.337 | 0.499 | 2.2696 | 0.6701 | 7.631 | -0.384 | 2.308 | -0.276 | 0.262 | -0.072 | 5.183 | 0.597 | 3.690 | -0.341 | 4.277 | 1.330 | 2.485 | 0.054 | 14.9554 | 4.0988 | 2.609 | 1.136 | 4.0902 | 1.2437 | 1.138 | 0.087 | 1.797 | 0.125 | 1.800 | 0.066 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 3.873 | 0.055 | 5.715 | -1.648 | 2.1450 | -0.2017 | 2.602 | -1.510 | 10.693 | -4.692 | 4.462 | -2.168 | 8.5333 | -1.3283 | 3.1933 | -1.3300 | 2.710 | -1.327 | 1.8300 | -0.0767 | 17.847 | -8.062 | 3.203 | -1.615 | 2.355 | -1.648 | 13.982 | -7.027 | 6.287 | -2.262 | 11.422 | -6.123 | 3.475 | -1.172 | 35.2000 | -18.0750 | 10.857 | -6.447 | 26.7958 | -21.4475 | 5.743 | -4.000 | 1.897 | -0.150 | 6.600 | -5.042 |
Part A: Placebo | 2.017 | 0.445 | 1.562 | 0.014 | 1.2607 | -0.0886 | 0.734 | -0.025 | 4.921 | 0.813 | 3.348 | -0.448 | 6.4300 | -1.0336 | 3.1978 | 0.0925 | 1.781 | 0.217 | 1.0274 | 0.3963 | 6.443 | 0.502 | 1.768 | 0.241 | 0.852 | 0.060 | 7.910 | -0.635 | 3.926 | 0.603 | 4.817 | 0.427 | 3.229 | -0.096 | 15.2372 | 2.2418 | 4.203 | 0.651 | 5.4506 | 0.0455 | 1.563 | 0.244 | 1.401 | 0.078 | 2.610 | -0.392 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | grams per Liter (g/L) (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Immunoglobulin A (IgA): Baseline | IgA: Change at Week 24 | Immunoglobulin G (IgG): Baseline | IgG: Change at Week 24 | Immunoglobulin M (IgM): Baseline | IgM: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 4.080 | -0.057 | 17.620 | -0.790 | 1.242 | -0.150 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 3.610 | -0.433 | 15.723 | -0.468 | 1.065 | -0.050 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | grams per Liter (g/L) (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Immunoglobulin A (IgA): Baseline | IgA: Change at Week 16 | IgA: Change at Week 24 | Immunoglobulin G (IgG): Baseline | IgG: Change at Week 16 | IgG: Change at Week 24 | Immunoglobulin M (IgM): Baseline | IgM: Change at Week 16 | IgM: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 3.116 | -0.006 | 0.012 | 14.792 | 0.233 | 0.758 | 1.106 | -0.065 | -0.072 |
Part A: Placebo | 3.350 | 0.033 | -0.093 | 14.423 | 1.057 | 0.874 | 1.046 | 0.004 | -0.003 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 36
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 6 | 1 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 36 | 3 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 3 | 0 |
Part A: Placebo | 38 | 6 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, 16 and 24
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Change at Week 12 | Change at Week 16 | Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -8.39 | -6.19 | -17.92 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | -44.36 | -50.20 | -60.59 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | -29.32 | -41.76 | -58.61 |
Part A: Placebo | -36.63 | -42.55 | -45.40 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin (Ig) titers for Pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae) including 23 types of serotypes (sero), tetanus and diphtheria were analyzed. AB = Antibody (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sero 1 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 2 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 3 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 4 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 5 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 6B IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 7F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 8 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 9N IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 9V IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 10A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 11A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 12F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 14 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 15B IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 17F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 18C IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 19A IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 19F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 20 IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 22F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 23F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | Sero 33F IgG AB: Change at Week 24 | C.tetani IgG Antibody: Change at Week24 | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -10.403 | -26.089 | 16.282 | -26.435 | 2.937 | -40.573 | -27.272 | -19.919 | 2.985 | -13.591 | 11.364 | 14.976 | -41.416 | 2.213 | -5.380 | -29.346 | -30.608 | -16.275 | -20.778 | -53.328 | -27.150 | 35.862 | -47.069 | 29.887 | 77.083 |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 159.298 | 2.207 | 51.000 | 26.481 | 23.064 | 34.204 | 19.827 | 13.552 | 13.703 | 56.445 | 24.321 | 18.956 | -11.447 | 20.278 | 69.305 | 51.187 | 43.454 | 32.146 | 101.397 | 75.407 | 20.048 | 22.329 | 23.533 | -11.895 | -8.842 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 2.996 | 17.857 | 530.405 | -15.385 | 81.053 | -7.761 | 1.928 | -14.917 | 22.663 | -3.399 | 101.031 | -16.656 | -5.463 | -31.375 | 17.353 | 1.009 | -14.827 | 44.814 | 5.412 | -37.641 | 23.828 | 18.204 | -3.348 | 39.032 | -50.000 |
Part A: Placebo | 53.629 | -2.263 | -10.854 | -8.039 | 13.293 | -8.215 | -7.560 | 13.540 | 13.302 | 32.983 | 19.729 | 51.134 | -4.445 | -3.087 | 11.206 | 20.238 | 14.720 | 21.433 | 54.691 | 35.202 | 11.419 | 0.215 | 2.245 | 19.517 | 15.310 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IgA: Change at Week 24 | IgG: Change at Week 24 | IgM: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | -0.10 | -5.88 | -14.99 |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | -15.55 | -2.53 | -6.73 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IgA: Change at Week 16 | IgA: Change at Week 24 | IgG: Change at Week 16 | IgG: Change at Week 24 | IgM: Change at Week 16 | IgM: Change at Week 24 | |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | -0.53 | -0.48 | 2.63 | 6.07 | -0.73 | 0.87 |
Part A: Placebo | 1.50 | -1.51 | 7.30 | 6.86 | 0.96 | 1.86 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Part A: pre-dose on Days 1, 29, 85 and 113 and post-dose on Days 1, 8, 29, 85, 169, 197 and 253
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1: Pre-dose | Day 1: Post-dose | Day 8 | Day 29: Pre-dose | Day 29: Post-dose | Day 85: Pre-dose | Day 113: Pre-dose | Day 169 | Day 197 | Day 253 | |
Part A: BIIB059 150 mg | 0.0 | 2.1 | 17.1 | 23.7 | 25.9 | 12.7 | 11.3 | 12.8 | 4.1 | 0.4 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Part A: pre-dose on Days 1, 29, 85 and 113 and post-dose on Days 1, 8, 29, 85, 169, 197 and 253
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1: Pre-dose | Day 1: Post-dose | Day 8 | Day 29: Pre-dose | Day 29: Post-dose | Day 85: Pre-dose | Day 85: Post-dose | Day 113: Pre-dose | Day 169 | Day 197 | Day 253 | |
Part A: BIIB059 450 mg | 0.0 | 1.9 | 45.5 | 53.6 | 52.5 | 34.7 | 36.1 | 34.6 | 32.0 | 12.6 | 2.8 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Part A: pre-dose on Days 1, 29, 85 and 113 and post-dose on Days 1, 8, 29, 85, 169, 197 and 253
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1: Pre-dose | Day 1: Post-dose | Day 8 | Day 29: Pre-dose | Day 29: Post-dose | Day 85: Pre-dose | Day 113: Pre-dose | Day 169 | Day 197 | |
Part A: BIIB059 50 mg | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 0.9 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin titers for tetanus and diphtheria were analyzed. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | IU/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
C. tetani IgG Antibody: Baseline | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Baseline | |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 3.00 | 0.10 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin titers for tetanus and diphtheria were analyzed. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | IU/mL (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
C. tetani IgG Antibody: Baseline | C. tetani IgG Antibody: Change at Week 12 | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Baseline | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Change at Week 12 | |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 5.04 | 1.20 | 0.74 | 0.06 |
Part B: Placebo | 4.41 | -0.61 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin (Ig) titers for Pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae) were analyzed, including 23 types of serotypes (sero). AB = Antibody. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sero 1 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 2 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 3 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 4 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 5 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 6B IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 7F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 8 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9N IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9V IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 10A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 11A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 12F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 14 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 15B IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 17F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 18C IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 20 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 22F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 23F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 33F IgG AB: Baseline | |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 0.210 | 0.9900 | 0.400 | 0.1000 | 3.3500 | 0.3600 | 0.660 | 0.2300 | 0.1300 | 0.070 | 2.140 | 0.3500 | 0.2700 | 8.9000 | 1.430 | 17.4500 | 0.140 | 13.7700 | 2.0500 | 0.7900 | 0.6700 | 0.5600 | 0.220 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin (Ig) titers for Pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae) were analyzed, including 23 types of serotypes (sero). AB = Antibody. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sero 1 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 1 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 2 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 2 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 3 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 3 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 4 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 4 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 5 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 5 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 6B IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 6B IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 7F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 7F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 8 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 8 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 9N IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9N IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 9V IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 9V IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 10A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 10A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 11A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 11A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 12F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 12F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 14 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 14 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 15B IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 15B IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 17F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 17F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 18C IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 18C IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 19A IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 19F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 19F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 20 IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 20 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 22F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 22F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 23F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 23F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 33F IgG AB: Baseline | Sero 33F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 1.930 | 0.116 | 3.9669 | -0.4734 | 1.133 | 0.307 | 1.2376 | 0.0450 | 5.0124 | 3.4794 | 2.9210 | 0.2738 | 3.030 | 0.796 | 2.6629 | 0.5931 | 2.0848 | 0.5875 | 1.520 | -0.181 | 6.600 | 4.696 | 3.5831 | 0.6431 | 1.2424 | 0.3638 | 11.0210 | -1.0319 | 3.410 | 0.624 | 6.8752 | 1.4531 | 5.630 | 0.077 | 16.5624 | 5.3575 | 3.3800 | 1.2275 | 8.2971 | -1.6638 | 3.8002 | 1.8431 | 1.9957 | 0.2775 | 4.245 | 0.203 |
Part B: Placebo | 3.538 | 4.193 | 4.7775 | -0.4586 | 3.881 | -1.886 | 3.6185 | 0.0571 | 7.2845 | 4.4443 | 10.7965 | 0.2943 | 2.482 | 4.399 | 3.6820 | 1.5329 | 4.1090 | 3.3407 | 1.104 | -0.001 | 6.760 | 1.833 | 2.1860 | 0.6293 | 2.1680 | 1.1429 | 5.6435 | 1.3686 | 4.717 | 0.209 | 16.0005 | -2.0357 | 4.083 | 8.439 | 24.5485 | 3.4457 | 4.1040 | 2.3893 | 11.5305 | -0.2271 | 5.9930 | -1.8500 | 1.6980 | 1.9964 | 5.500 | -0.281 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IgA: Baseline | IgA: Change at Week 16 | IgG: Baseline | IgG: Change at Week 16 | IgM: Baseline | IgM: Change at Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 2.900 | -0.016 | 13.700 | -0.084 | 1.095 | -0.045 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 3.873 | -0.117 | 14.087 | -0.776 | 0.880 | -0.072 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16
Intervention | g/L (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IgA: Baseline | IgA: Change at Week 12 | IgA: Change at Week 16 | IgG: Baseline | IgG: Change at Week 12 | IgG: Change at Week 16 | IgM: Baseline | IgM: Change at Week 12 | IgM: Change at Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 3.061 | -0.304 | -0.076 | 14.874 | -1.961 | -0.064 | 0.993 | -0.028 | -0.035 |
Part B: Placebo | 3.341 | -0.029 | -0.045 | 13.480 | 0.120 | 0.450 | 0.978 | -0.009 | -0.016 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 15 | 3 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 38 | 3 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 18 | 1 |
Part B: Placebo | 22 | 3 |
Vaccine-related immunoglobulin (Ig) titers for Pneumococcus (S. pneumoniae) including 23 types of serotypes (sero), tetanus and diphtheria were analyzed. AB = Antibody. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sero 1 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 2 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 3 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 4 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 5 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 6B IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 7F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 8 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 9N IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 9V IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 10A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 11A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 12F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 14 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 15B IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 17F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 18C IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 19A IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 19F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 20 IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 22F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 23F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | Sero 33F IgG AB: Change at Week 12 | C. tetani IgG Antibody: Change at Week 12 | Diphtheria IgG Antibody: Change at Week 12 | |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 4.257 | 15.437 | 40.604 | 32.033 | 68.850 | 43.759 | 25.297 | 41.622 | 19.616 | -0.573 | 60.437 | 29.295 | 62.768 | 18.059 | 27.188 | 19.712 | 8.882 | 44.140 | 46.995 | 0.714 | 38.974 | 16.859 | 26.241 | 27.872 | 28.845 |
Part B: Placebo | 16.835 | -20.725 | -3.370 | 6.349 | 39.578 | 11.800 | 67.784 | 28.981 | 18.274 | -7.707 | 62.824 | 12.392 | 21.768 | 77.551 | 14.160 | -14.128 | 36.970 | 15.179 | 54.773 | 1.131 | -14.748 | 52.210 | 0.600 | -6.387 | 0.000 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ig A: Change at Week 16 | Ig G: Change at Week 16 | Ig M: Change at Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 0.19 | 1.05 | -1.25 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | -1.48 | -3.84 | -7.60 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16
Intervention | percent change (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ig A: Change at Week 12 | Ig A: Change at Week 16 | Ig G: Change at Week 12 | Ig G: Change at Week 16 | Ig M: Change at Week 12 | Ig M: Change at Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | -5.11 | -2.98 | -8.40 | -0.39 | -1.22 | -0.57 |
Part B: Placebo | -1.45 | -1.32 | 0.63 | 2.48 | -1.25 | -3.62 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. The percentage of participants with a >=4-point reduction from baseline in CLASI-A score are reported here. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 76.00 | 72.00 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 47.92 | 55.81 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 50.00 | 46.15 |
Part B: Placebo | 33.33 | 37.50 |
The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. The percentage of participants with a >=7-point reduction from baseline in CLASI-A score are reported here. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 40.00 | 48.00 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 33.33 | 41.86 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 38.46 | 30.77 |
Part B: Placebo | 18.18 | 21.88 |
CLASI-50 Response is defined as a 50% improvement from baseline in CLASI-A score at Weeks 12 and 16. The CLASI is a clinical tool that quantifies disease activity and damage in CLE. The activity scale (CLASI-A) includes measurements of erythema, scale and hypertrophy, and mucous membrane disease. Each part of the body is listed separately, from the scalp to the feet, in addition to sections focusing on mucous membrane involvement and alopecia. Points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. CLASI-A scores of 0-9, 10-20, and 21-70 represent disease severity of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Week 12, Week 16
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 16 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 48.00 | 44.00 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 37.50 | 46.51 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 38.46 | 38.46 |
Part B: Placebo | 12.12 | 21.88 |
(NCT02847598)
Timeframe: Part B: pre-dose on Days 1, 29, 85 and post-dose on Days 1, 29, 85, 113, 141, 169 and 197
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1: Pre-dose | Day 1: Post-dose | Day 8 | Day 29: Pre-dose | Day 29: Post-dose | Day 85: Pre-dose | Day 85: Post-dose | Day 113 | Day 141 | Day 169 | Day 197 | |
Part B: BIIB059 150 mg | 0.1 | 1.1 | 13.3 | 16.9 | 17.6 | 11.0 | 11.6 | 12.1 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
Part B: BIIB059 450 mg | 0.0 | 2.9 | 47.8 | 60.2 | 61.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 43.2 | 19.3 | 7.4 | 3.4 |
Part B: BIIB059 50 mg | 0.0 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
Number of Participants with changes in vital signs, ECGs, Safety laboratory parameters (full blood count including white differential count, clinical chemistry, thyroid hormones, urinalysis, and faecal occult blood test), Development of anti-drug antibodies against BT063 (anti-BT063), Immunological status of potential viral and bacterial infections (HBV, HCV, HIV, tetanus, diphtheria tuberculosis), EBV / CMV Serology, Premature withdrawals. (NCT02554019)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Trial Visit (Week 14)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
BT063 50 mg | 0 |
BT063 100 mg | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (Including SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation) from Baseline through End of Trial Visit (Week 14) (NCT02554019)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Trial Visit (Week 14)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects with TEAEs | Subjects with TEAEs leading to early termination | Subjects with treatment-emergent SAEs | Subjects with drug-related TEAEs | Subjects with severe TEAEs | Subjects with TEAEs leading to death | |
BT063 100 mg | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
BT063 50 mg | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Number of Participants with 50% improvement in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Sensitivity Index (CLASI) Activity score. The CLASI is an assessment over 13 body regions (scalp, ears, nose - including malar area, rest of the face, V-area neck - frontal, post. neck & shoulders, chest, abdomen, back and buttocks, arms, hands, legs, feet) and consists of 2 scores: total activity score and total damage score. Only the activity score was used in this study.~The minimum score possible on this scale is 0 and the maximum score is 70. The higher scores mean a worse outcome." (NCT02554019)
Timeframe: At week14 and week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
50% improvement in CLASI Activity score at week 14 | 50% improvement in CLASI Activity score at week 28 | |
BT063 100 mg | 5 | 4 |
BT063 50 mg | 6 | 7 |
Placebo | 3 | 3 |
Number of Participants with 50% improvement of swollen/tender joints. A total of 66/68 joints was assessed for the swollen/tender joint count. A joint that is normal (no tenderness or swelling), without signs of inflammation will be graded as 0. A joint with tenderness will be graded as 1 for tender joint count and a joint with swelling will be graded as 1 for swollen joint count. Joints suspected or known to have ischemic osteonecrosis are not to be taken into consideration. Higher scores indicate more disease activity. (NCT02554019)
Timeframe: At week14 and week 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
50% improvement in swollen joints at week 14 | 50% improvement in swollen joints at week 28 | 50% improvement in tender joints at week 14 | 50% improvement in tender joints at week 28 | |
BT063 100 mg | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
BT063 50 mg | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
Placebo | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
"Percent changes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores from baseline SLEDAI-2K score.~The SLEDAI-2K is a global index that measures SLE disease activity. It includes 24 items for the 9 organs/systems. Scores range from 0 to 105; a score of 6 is considered clinically important. The index measures disease activity within the last 10 days. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Negative percent change means reduced disease activity." (NCT02554019)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 14 and at week 28
Intervention | percentage of change (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Percent changes in SLEDAI-2K scores at week 14 | Percent changes in SLEDAI-2K scores at week 28 | |
BT063 100 mg | -18.0 | -24.4 |
BT063 50 mg | -29.3 | -28.9 |
Placebo | -18.2 | -13.5 |
Change from baseline in number of joints (active joint) with pain and signs of inflammation (tenderness, swelling or effusion) for participants with at least 2 affected joints at baseline were reported. An active joint is defined as a joint with pain and signs of inflammation (e.g., tenderness, swelling or effusion). (NCT02349061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Joints (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.8 |
Ustekinumab | -4.5 |
PGA was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0.0 to 10.0 centimeter [cm]). The scale for the physician's assessment ranges for 'no lupus activity' (0.0) to 'extremely active lupus' (10.0). (NCT02349061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.93 |
Ustekinumab | -2.17 |
The SLEDAI-2K is an established, validated SLE activity index. It is based on the presence of 24 features in 9 organ systems and measures disease activity in SLE patients in the previous 30 days. It is weighted according to the feature. Features are scored by the assessing physician if present within the last 30 days with more severe features having higher scores, and then simply added to determine the total SLEDAI 2K score, which ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity. (NCT02349061)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -3.8 |
Ustekinumab | -4.4 |
BICLA response defined as participants meeting following criteria: 1. BILAG improvement (all BILAG A scores at baseline improved to either B, C or D and all BILAG B scores at baseline improved to C or D and no worsening in disease activity defined as no new BILAG A scores and <= 1 new BILAG B score) and 2. no worsening of total SLEDAI-2K from baseline 3. < 1 cm increase in PGA and 4. no treatment failure criteria met. BILAG: assesses disease extent, severity (range: A [severe] to E [no disease]). SLEDAI-2K: assesses improvement in disease activity (range: 0 to 105; higher score = higher severity). PGA: assesses worsening in participant's general health status (0.0= 'no lupus activity' to 10.0 = 'extremely active lupus'). (NCT02349061)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 14 |
Ustekinumab | 21 |
SRI-4 response was defined as greater than or equal to 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and no worsening (less than 10 percent increase) from baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA). Composite response is defined as SRI-4 response in participants who do not meet treatment failure criteria. SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0 to 105, with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters related to SLE, divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system: A=severe disease, B=moderate disease, C=mild stable disease, D=inactive, but previously active, E=inactive and never affected. The PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale = from very well (0)-very poor (10). (NCT02349061)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 33.3 |
Ustekinumab | 61.7 |
The PK model was fitted to the observed serum concentration-time data. The AUC values reported in this table are model derived values at ss, assuming a 10 mg/kg dose administered once every 28 days. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: 28-days dosing interval at steady state
Intervention | Micrograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 3012 |
ParentGA assesses the participant's overall well-being at the moment rated on a 21-numbered circle visual analog scale (VAS; 0 - very well, 10 - very poorly). Baseline was defined as measurements at Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from value at Week 52 divided by the Baseline value X 100. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used. Eight participants had a score of zero at Baseline and therefore, could not be included in the analysis. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | -23.61 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | -53.85 |
The PedsQL is a generic quality of life scale validated for the pediatric population which consists of 23 items, encompassing 4 health domains: Physical Functioning (8 items), Emotional Functioning (5 items), Social Functioning (5 items), and School Functioning (5 items). From the raw scores of the 23 items, a total summary score and individual domain scores can be calculated. The total and domain scores are each transformed on a 0 to 100 score with higher scores indicating higher quality of life. For Physical Functioning Domain scale, score was from 0 to 100 where, 0 indicates lower quality of life and 100 indicates greater quality of life. Baseline was defined as measurements at Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from value at Week 52 divided by the Baseline Value X 100. LOCF was used. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 12.5 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 10.5 |
The PGA is a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS), anchored at 0 (none) and 3 (severe), designed for the physician to indicate the participant's overall disease activity at a particular visit as part of the validated SELENA SLEDAI index. Primary investigator or a subinvestigator scored the PGA for the participant, and same person evaluated the participant each time. Baseline was defined as measurements at Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from value at Week 52 divided by the Baseline value X 100. LOCF was used. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -48.802 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | -56.525 |
Percent change from Baseline in proteinuria was calculated. The percent change from baseline to Week 52 in 24 hour proteinuria was analyzed using summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals, without any adjustment for covariates. Baseline was defined as measurements at Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from value at Week 52 divided by the Baseline Value X 100. LOCF was used. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent Change (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.0920 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | -2.1277 |
The SELENA SLEDAI score is a weighted index for assessing SLE disease activity in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each of 9 organ system were given a weighted score and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. A SELENA SLEDAI score of 0 would suggest no lupus activity; while a score of 105 is the maximum calculable if all items were scored as being present from active lupus. A decrease of 4 points or more equates to a clinically meaningful improvement. Baseline was defined as measurements at Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from value at Week 52 divided by the Baseline value X 100. One participant had missing data at Baseline and therefore, could not be included in the analysis. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -38.0 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | -43.3 |
Sustained ParentGA response was defined as having >0.7 improvement at Weeks 44, 48, and 52 compared at Baseline. Data for percentage of participants with a sustained ParentGA response was presented. Thirteen participants had a score of <=0.7 at Baseline and therefore, could not be included in the analysis. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 33.3 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 59.1 |
Sustained SRI response was defined as having a response on the primary efficacy endpoint at Weeks 44, 48, and 52. Data for percentage of participants with a sustained SRI response was presented. Drop Outs and Treatment Failures were considered Non-Responders. Only those participants with data available at specific time point were analyzed. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 41.0 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 43.4 |
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from Baseline in safety of estrogen in lupus national assessment (SELENA) systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score, no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from Baseline) in physician's global assessment (PGA) and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group of SLE clinics (BILAG) A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model for the comparison between belimumab and placebo with covariates treatment group, Baseline SELENA SLEDAI score (<=12 vs. >=13). Percentage of participants with SRI response at Week 52 of Part A were reported. Intent-to-Treat Population comprised of all participants who were randomized and treated with at least one dose of study agent in Part A. One participant had missing data at Baseline and therefore, could not be included in the analysis. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 43.6 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 52.8 |
The pharmacokinetic (PK) population comprised all participants included in the As- Treated population for whom at least one post belimumab treatment PK sample was obtained and analyzed. The PK model was fitted to the observed serum concentration-time data. The maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) concentrations reported in this table are model derived values at ss, assuming a 10 mg/kg dose administered once every 28 days. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: 28-days dosing interval at steady state
Intervention | Micrograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cmax, ss | Cmin, ss | |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 315 | 50 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia were categorized as SAE. Number of participants with AEs and SAEs have been reported. (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Up to 60 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 42 | 9 |
Placebo | 33 | 14 |
Percentage of participants meeting PRINTO/ACR Juvenile SLE Response Evaluation criteria for improvement in juvenile SLE using two different PRINTO/ACR Juvenile SLE Response Evaluation definitions of improvement that is Definition 1: At least 50% improvement in any 2 of 5 endpoints below and no more than 1 of the remaining worsening by more than 30% and Definition 2: At least 30% improvement in 3 of 5 endpoints below and no more than 1 of the remaining worsening more than 30%. Endpoints were: 1. Percent change in Parent's Global Assessment (ParentGA) at Week 52, 2. Percent change in PGA at Week 52, 3. Percent change in SELENA SLEDAI score at Week 52, 4. Percent change in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) physical functioning domain at Week 52, 5. Percent change in 24 hour proteinuria at Week 52 (gram/24hour equivalent by spot urine protein to creatinine ratio). (NCT01649765)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Definition 1 | Definition 2 | |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 60.4 | 52.8 |
Placebo | 35.0 | 27.5 |
The area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUCt) was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.
Intervention | ng*h/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 29 | |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 11.29 | 15.55 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QOD | 10.82 | 13.34 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg QD | 38.73 | 52.65 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 34.15 | 24.85 |
Joint swelling was noted as present or absent. Forty-four joints were assessed for swelling, including the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were included in this joint count. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Joints (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Week 100 Follow-Up | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -1.2 | -1.8 | -2.6 | -2.1 | -3.9 | -3.6 | -2.6 | -4.0 | -4.2 | -3.7 | -3.6 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.3 | 1.2 | -0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.4 |
Joint tenderness was noted as present or absent. Forty-four joints were assessed for swelling, including the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were included in this joint count. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Joints (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Week 100 Follow-Up | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -0.9 | -0.9 | 0.5 | -3.9 | -5.1 | -5.9 | -5.6 | -6.2 | -7.3 | -7.0 | -4.1 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -2.5 | -2.0 | -3.7 | -3.6 | -3.8 | -3.0 | -4.4 | -6.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.4 |
The BILAG-2004 index measures clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 9 domains (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal, and hematologic). BILAG A represents the most active disease or severe disease; BILAG B represents intermediate activity or moderate disease; BILAG C represents stable mild disease; BILAG D represents organ system previously affected but now inactive; and BILAG E represents organ system never involved. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 9 domains. The theoretical range spans from 0 (no activity) to 13 active or severe disease activity BILAG. A higher score means more severe disease activity while a lower score means lower disease activity (or no disease activity for score of zero). (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Global Score Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -0.5 | 2.0 | -2.2 | -6.3 | -7.3 | -6.1 | -6.3 | -7.5 | -7.8 | -0.52 | -6.3 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 3.3 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 4.3 | -1.0 | -0.20 | -3.9 |
The CLASI Activity Score ranges from 0 to 70. To generate the activity score erythema is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/hemorrhagic) and scale/hypertrophy are scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous/hypertrophic). Both the erythema and scale/hypertrophy scores are assessed in 13 different anatomical locations. In addition, the presence of mucous membrane lesions is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 1 (lesion or ulceration), the occurrence of recent hair loss is captured (1=yes; 0=no) and nonscarring alopecia is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (focal or patchy in more than one quadrant). To calculate the CLASI activity score, all scores for erythema, scale/hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions and alopecia are added together. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. The higher the score, the greater the cutaneous disease activity. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | -0.3 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 0.0 | -1.0 | -0.9 | -2.2 | -2.2 | -2.4 | -2.6 | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
"The Fatigue VAS evaluates SLE-related fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale. The Fatigue VAS allowed the participant to indicate the degree of SLE-related fatigue by placing an X representing how they feel, along a visual analog line that extends between two extremes (e.g., from not at all tired to extremely tired) over the previous week. A decrease in the fatigue VAS indicates improvement." (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -10.0 | -4.1 | -15.9 | -13.6 | -21.1 | -29.9 | -23.0 | -22.8 | -10.3 | -9.8 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -4.0 | -3.7 | -8.0 | -4.0 | -17.2 | -12.8 | -12.6 | -25.7 | -14.0 | -20.0 |
The SELENA SLEDAI score measures SLE disease activity through assessment of 24 lupus descriptors/manifestations. Each descriptor (clinical or lab values) receives a positive score if it is present over the previous assessment period; a score of '0' indicates inactive disease while a positive score (from 1 to 8 based on the relative importance of each descriptor in the total scoring) indicates disease activity. The SELENA SLEDAI score is the sum of all 24 descriptors' scores for the assessment period. The SELENA SLEDAI score can range from '0' (no SLE disease activity) to a maximum theoretical score of 105 (maximum SLE disease activity). The higher the SELENA SLEDAI score the greater of SLE disease activity. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Week 100 Follow-Up | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 0.2 | 0.2 | -1.8 | -2.8 | -3.1 | -2.9 | -2.6 | -3.0 | -3.0 | -2.0 | -1.7 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -1.0 | -1.7 | -0.9 | -1.2 | 0.3 | -1.0 | -1.8 | -1.3 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
The pericardial/pleuritic pain scale was scored using numerical values of 1 through 10 with 1 representing 'no pain' and 10 representing 'worst possible pain'. These were self-administered by the participants and gauged the severity of their SLE pain related to pericardial and pleuritic discomfort. Any indication from participants or study assessments, aside from pain, which indicated clinically significant pericardial or pleuritic manifestations of SLE was thoroughly investigated; if clinically significant SLE related complications were found, the participants was to be discontinued from the study and entered into the Observational Follow-up Period and treated appropriately. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -1.0 | -0.8 | -1.1 | -1.0 | -0.7 | -1.4 | -1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.2 | -0.6 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
"The physician's global assessment was administered by the treating physician and was used to gauge the participants overall state of health. The instrument uses a visual analogue scale with scores between 0 and 3 to indicate worsening of disease. The scoring is as follows:~0 = none~1 = mild disease~2 = moderate disease~3 = severe disease" (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -0.08 | -0.26 | -0.15 | -0.28 | -0.30 | -0.53 | -0.37 | -0.48 | -0.57 | -0.52 | -0.21 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -0.10 | -0.17 | -0.31 | -0.20 | -0.36 | -0.26 | -0.24 | -0.23 | -0.30 | -0.20 | 0.10 |
SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Damage is defined as nonreversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. Damage is defined for 12 separate organ systems: ocular (range 0-2), neuropsychiatric (0-6), renal (0-3), pulmonary (0-5), cardiovascular (0-6), peripheral vascular (0-5), gastrointestinal (0-6), musculoskeletal (0-7), skin (0-3), endocrine (diabetes) (0-1), gonadal (0-1) and malignancies (0-2). A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 47, and increasing score indicates increasing disease damage severity. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 29 | |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 0.64 | 1.09 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QOD | 0.90 | 1.02 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg QD | 2.35 | 3.51 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 2.92 | 2.37 |
A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that began or worsened on or after the start of IP up to 28 days after the last dose of IP or IP discontinuation date, whichever was later. Each participant was counted once for each applicable category. An IP-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE that the investigator considered to be of suspected relationship to IP. The severity of each adverse event and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from mild - mild symptoms to severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) was any AE which: • Resulted in death • Was life-threatening • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect • Constituted an important medical event. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: From the start of the first dose of IP until 28 days after the last dose or study discontinuation in Part 1; median treatment duration = 12.0 weeks for the placebo, 0.3 mg QOD and 0.3 mg iberdomide QD arms, 11.9 weeks for the 0.6/0.3 ALT and 0.6 cohorts.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Any IP-related TEAE | Any Severe TEAE | Any Serious TEAE | Any Serious IP-related TEAE | Any TEAE Leading to IP Interruption | Any TEAE Leading to IP Withdrawal | Any TEAE Leading to Death | |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QOD | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg QD | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Part 1: Placebo | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that began or worsened on or after the start of IP through 28 days after the last dose of IP or IP discontinuation date, whichever was later. Each participant was counted once for each applicable category. An IP-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE that the investigator considered to be of suspected relationship to IP. The severity of each adverse event and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from mild - mild symptoms to severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) was any AE which: • Resulted in death • Was life-threatening • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect • Constituted an important medical event. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of IP in the ATEP until 28 days after the last dose in the ATEP or study discontinuation; median duration of IP was 95.86 weeks for the 0.3 mg iberdomide QD cohort and 60.64 weeks for the 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT QD cohorts.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Any IP-related TEAE | Any Severe TEAE | Any Serious TEAE | Any Serious IP-related TEAE | Any TEAE Leading to IP Interruption | Any TEAE Leading to IP Withdrawal | Any TEAE Leading to Death | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
The CLASI Activity Score ranges from 0 to 70. To generate the activity score erythema is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/hemorrhagic) and scale/hypertrophy are scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous/hypertrophic). Both the erythema and scale/hypertrophy scores are assessed in 13 different anatomical locations. In addition, the presence of mucous membrane lesions is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 1 (lesion or ulceration), the occurrence of recent hair loss is captured (1=yes; 0=no) and nonscarring alopecia is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (focal or patchy in more than one quadrant). To calculate the CLASI activity score, all scores for erythema, scale/hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions and alopecia are added together. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. The higher the score, the greater the cutaneous disease activity. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Percent Change (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Follow-Up Week 100 | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | -21.40 | -32.13 | -18.42 | 13.54 | -0.56 | -46.97 | -65.64 | -55.13 | -65.71 | -75.38 | -53.04 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | -13.35 | -18.32 | -36.46 | -44.69 | -43.98 | -46.00 | -47.51 | -40.35 | -32.46 | -26.32 | -18.82 |
The SELENA SLEDAI score measures SLE disease activity through assessment of 24 lupus descriptors/manifestations. Each descriptor (clinical or lab values) receives a positive score if it is present over the previous assessment period; a score of '0' indicates inactive disease while a positive score (from 1 to 8 based on the relative importance of each descriptor in the total scoring) indicates disease activity. The SELENA SLEDAI score is the sum of all 24 descriptors' scores for the assessment period. The SELENA SLEDAI score can range from '0' (no SLE disease activity) to a maximum theoretical score of 105 (maximum SLE disease activity). The higher the SELENA SLEDAI score the greater of SLE disease activity. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Week 100 Follow-Up | |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 83.3 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
ATEP: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 12.5 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Terminal phase half-life in plasma, calculated as [(In 2)/λz]. T1/2 half was only calculated when a reliable estimate for λz could be obtained. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.
Intervention | days (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 29 | |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 10.25 | 11.85 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QOD | 7.50 | 8.46 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg QD | 9.55 | 11.32 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 7.96 | 9.39 |
Time to Cmax, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed. (NCT02185040)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.
Intervention | days (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 29 | |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QD | 6.00 | 2.00 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.3 mg QOD | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg QD | 4.01 | 2.02 |
Part 1: Iberdomide 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT Days | 1.92 | 3.00 |
The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 0.4 |
Acthar/Acthar | 1.3 |
"The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree) to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from no fatigue to fatigue as bad as could be. Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue.~This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue)." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 4.523 |
Acthar/Acthar | 4.743 |
The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 45.272 |
Acthar/Acthar | 39.700 |
The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 43.618 |
Acthar/Acthar | 39.710 |
"Participants are counted as responders based on:~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 4 |
Acthar/Acthar | 3 |
"Participants are counted as responders based on two SLE indices: the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index amended by the SELENA group (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index.~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for the arthritis descriptor (highest possible score is 4) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash (highest possible score is 2) and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations. It has an ordinal scale scoring system by design that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems. The individual system scores were not intended to be summated into a global score." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 4 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Acthar | 4 |
"Participants are counted as responders based on:~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 4 to 0 for arthritis and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG~OR~decrease in SELENA-SLEDAI score from 2 to 0 for rash and no worsening in other organ systems based on BILAG" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Acthar | 11 |
(NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 52 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 1 |
Acthar/Acthar | 6 |
The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Week 52. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | Tender or Swollen Joints (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 1.1 |
Acthar/Acthar | 0.7 |
"SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI).~The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity." (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo/Acthar | 3 |
Acthar/Acthar | 4 |
"The BILAG is a transitional index that captures changing severity of clinical manifestations that produces an overview of disease activity across eight systems.~The 8 systems are scored on a scale from 0=not present to 4=worse, for the 4 week period before the assessment. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 32. A higher score means the symptoms are worse.~Rows: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 15.7 | 9.2 | 6.8 |
Placebo | 15.4 | 10.3 | 13.5 |
"The CLASI consists of two scores the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored on the basis of erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The CLASI score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease.~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 6.4 | 4.8 | 3.7 |
Placebo | 6.1 | 6.3 | 5.7 |
"The Krupp FSS is a scale to rate disability-related fatigue. Respondents use a scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree) to indicate their agreement with nine statements about fatigue. A visual analogue scale is also included with the scale; respondents are asked to denote the severity of their fatigue over the past 2 weeks by placing a mark on a line extending from no fatigue to fatigue as bad as could be. Higher scores on the scale are indicative of more severe fatigue.~This validated fatigue severity scale measures impact of fatigue with a 9-item questionnaire, with a 7-point Likert scale for each question. Total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 63 (worst possible fatigue).~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 5.648 | 5.298 | 5.152 |
Placebo | 5.374 | 5.379 | 5.404 |
The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement. (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 38.406 | 40.280 | 40.408 |
Placebo | 41.304 | 38.744 | 39.256 |
"The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores indicate improvement.~Rows: at Baseline, at Week 4, at Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 31.526 | 35.318 | 35.701 |
Placebo | 32.927 | 32.831 | 33.310 |
The doctor counted the number of tender or swollen joints at Baseline, at Week 4, and at Week 8 (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: at Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 (within 8 weeks)
Intervention | Tender or Swollen Joints (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
at Baseline | at Week 4 | at Week 8 | |
Acthar | 9.6 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Placebo | 6.2 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
"SLEDAI was modeled on the basis of clinician global judgment. A participant's SELENA-SLEDAI total score is the sum of all marked SLE-related descriptors on a checklist developed by the SELENA Group (also referred to as hybrid SLEDAI).~The scores of the descriptors range from 0 to 8. A total score can fall between 0 and 105, with a higher score representing a more significant degree of disease activity.~Rows: Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8" (NCT01753401)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | |
Acthar | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Placebo | 10.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
Number of days of daily prednisone dose <=7.5 mg/day and/or reduced by 50 percent over time through each scheduled visit during the blinded period were compared between belimumab and placebo using Rank ANCOVA model which was used for comparing belimumab and placebo. The independent variables in the model included treatment group, Baseline prednisone dose level, country, Baseline SELENA SLEDAI score (<=9 vs. >=10) and complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4). This analysis was perfomed on the participants who used prednisone >7.5 mg/day at Baseline. (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.0 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 0.0 |
SRI response is a composite index, defined as the percent of participants with >=4 point reduction from Baseline in safety of estrogen in lupus national assessment (SELENA) systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score and no worsening (increase of < 0.30 points from Baseline) in physicians global assessment (PGA) and no new British isles lupus assessment group (BILAG) A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline at the time of assessment (at Week 52 of the blinded period). A SELENA SLEDAI score of 0 would suggest no lupus activity; while a score of 105 is the maximum calculable if all items were scored as being present from active lupus. PGA ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity). BILAG has no range. The higher thresholds of SELENA SLEDAI improvement (i.e., SRI5, SRI6, and SRI7) indicates a higher response (SRI5 is a 5 point SELENA SLEDAI reduction, SRI6 is a 6 point reduction, and SRI7 is a 7 point reduction). (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 40.1 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 53.8 |
The SELENA SLEDAI score is a weighted index for assessing SLE disease activity in which signs and symptoms, laboratory tests and physician's assessment for each of 9 organ system were given a weighted score and summed if present at the time of the visit or in the preceding 10 days. A SELENA SLEDAI score of 0 would suggest no lupus activity; while a score of 105 is the maximum calculable if all items were scored as being present from active lupus. A decrease of 4 points or more equates to a clinically meaningful improvement. The Baseline value of a variable is defined as the value of the variable measured at Day 0 prior to dosing. In case of multiple results on Day 0 prior to dosing, the latest result was used. If a Day 0 value was not available, the last available value prior to Day 0 was used. (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 42.2 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 55.7 |
SRI7 response is defined as the percent of participants with >=7 point reduction from Baseline in SELENA SLEDAI score and no worsening (increase of < 0.30 points from Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline at the time of assessment (at Week 52 of the blinded period). A SELENA SLEDAI score of 0 would suggest no lupus activity; while a score of 105 is the maximum calculable if all items were scored as being present from active lupus. PGA ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity). BILAG has no range. The higher thresholds of SELENA SLEDAI improvement (i.e., SRI5, SRI6, and SRI7) indicates a higher response (SRI5 is a 5 point SELENA SLEDAI reduction, SRI6 is a 6 point reduction, and SRI7 is a 7 point reduction). (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 23.5 |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | 32.4 |
Time to first severe SLE flare is defined as the number of days from first treatment until the participant had an event (event date-treatement start date +1). If a participant had a severe SFI flare and received protocol restricted medication then the event date was the earliest of the first severe SFI flare date, and the treatment failure date. Analysis of severe SFI flare was performed on the modified SELENA SLEDAI SLE flare index in which the modification excluded severe flares that were triggered only by an increase in SELENA SLEDAI score to >12. Analysis was from Cox proportional hazards model for the comparison between belimumab and placebo adjusting for country, Baseline SELENA SLEDAI score (<=9 vs. >=10) and complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4). (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: 52 weeks
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | NA |
Belimumab 10 mg/kg | NA |
SRI response is a composite index, defined as the percent of participants with >=4 point reduction from Baseline in SELENA SLEDAI score and no worsening (increase of < 0.30 points from Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline at time of assessment. Excludes participants with a SELENA SLEDAI score <4 at baseline. Participants randomized to belimumab in double-blinded (DB) phase, Baseline is last available value before first belimumab dose received in DB phase. Participants randomized to placebo in DB phase, Baseline is last available value before receiving first belimumab dose in OL phase. Observed case data are presented.Year 6 Week 48 is the Exit Visit obtained by slotting the Exit Visit to Week 48. A SELENA SLEDAI score of 0 (no lupus activity) and a score of 105 (maximum). PGA ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity). BILAG has no range. (NCT01345253)
Timeframe: Weeks 24 and 48 for Years 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 24, Year 2, n=326 | Week 48, Year 2, n=299 | Week 24, Year 3, n=271 | Week 48, Year 3, n=247 | Week 24, Year 4, n=233 | Week 48, Year 4, n=194 | Week 24, Year 5, n= 156 | Week 48, Year 5, n= 82 | Week 24, Year 6, n= 36 | Week 48, Year 6, n= 5 | |
Belimumab 10mg/kg (Open-label Phase) | 66.0 | 69.6 | 72.3 | 70.9 | 71.7 | 76.8 | 81.4 | 80.5 | 86.1 | 60.0 |
This is a landmark measure of percentage of patients who meet response criteria. To meet the BICLA response measure a patient must, compared to baseline, have a decrease in all moderate or severe scores on the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index by at least one severity grade (Severe disease (BILAG A score) must drop to at least moderate (B or better) and B must drop to at least mild (C or not present). Also, there must be no increase in any other BILAG organ scores, no increase in The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, and no increase in the physician's global assessment (PGA) by more than 10% of the scale. Furthermore, there may no off protocol medication increases. Note on all scales mentioned a higher score signifies greater disease activity. Ranges on BILAG could be 0-108 but are rarely greater than 36. SLEDAI could range 0-105 but is rarely greater than 20. PGA 0-100 but rarely greater than 76. (NCT01781611)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Extended Release Dipyridamole/Aspirin | 3 |
Aspirin | 2 |
This is a landmark analysis of percentage of patients who, compared to baseline, have a 4 point drop in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). A 4 point decrease signifies a clinically significant decrease in disease activity as reported in many studies and as commonly used as a clinical endpoint in trials. SLEDAI could range 0-105 but is rarely greater than 20. (NCT01781611)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Extended Release Dipyridamole/Aspirin | 4 |
Aspirin | 2 |
This is a landmark analysis of percentage of patients who meet the following response criteria: Compared to baseline there must be a 4 point decrease in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), no increase in The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index score and no more of an increase in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) than 10% of the scale. As assessed here, there must also be no off protocol increase in medications. All scales signify worsening disease when scores increase. Ranges on BILAG could be 0-108 but are rarely greater than 36. SLEDAI could range 0-105 but is rarely greater than 20. PGA 0-100 but rarely greater than 76. (NCT01781611)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Extended Release Dipyridamole/Aspirin | 3 |
Aspirin | 2 |
FACIT-Fatigue score calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assess self reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. It uses a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse possible score) to 52 (best score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status. Least Squares (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >= 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South, America/Mexico, Europe, Asia Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.44 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 7.46 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 7.08 |
The number of swollen joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South America/Mexico, Europe, Asia and Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | swollen joint count (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -5.37 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -5.67 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -5.81 |
The number of tender and painful joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South America/Mexico, Europe, Asia and Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | tender joint count (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -7.50 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -7.26 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -7.94 |
Participants assessed their worst pain in the last 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The average worst daily pain score was calculated as the mean of the scores over the last 7 days prior to each assessment time point. Higher score indicated severe pain. Least Squares (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline disease activity (total SLEDAI-2K <10; >=10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; >= 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), region (North America, Central/South, America/Mexico, Europe, Asia Rest of World), visit (as categorical variable), baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.62 |
2 mg Baricitinib | -1.73 |
4 mg Baricitinib | -1.71 |
"The LLDAS is a composite measure designed to identify patients achieving a state of low disease activity. The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) SLEDAI-2K <=4, with no activity in major organ systems (CNS, vascular, renal, cardiorespiratory and constitutional); where no activity is defined as all items of SLEDAI-2K within these major organ systems equal to 0. (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared to previous occurred visit, where the new feature is defined as any of the SLEDAI-2K 24 items changed from 0 to greater than 0; (3) PGA (scale 0-3), <=1; (4) current prednisolone (or equivalent) dose <=7.5 mg daily." (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 26.2 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 25.7 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 29.7 |
"SRI-4 response defined as 1)greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score 2)no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and 3)no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity (worsening defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale).~SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease,B=moderate disease,C=mild stable disease,D=inactive,but previously active,E=inactive and never affected. PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 3 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe)." (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 45.9 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 56.7 |
"SRI-4 response defined as 1)greater than or equal to (>=) 4-point reduction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) total score 2)no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A and no more than 1 new BILAG B domain score and 3)no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity (worsening defined as an increase of >=0.3 from baseline on a 0-3 visual analogue scale).~SLEDAI-2K assessment consists of 24 items with total score of 0(no symptoms) to 105 (presence of all defined symptoms) with higher scores representing increased disease activity. BILAG Index: assessing clinical signs, symptoms,or laboratory parameters related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE),divided into 9 organ systems. For each organ system A=severe disease,B=moderate disease,C=mild stable disease,D=inactive,but previously active,E=inactive and never affected. PGA assess disease activity on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 3 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe)." (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 45.9 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 49.8 |
For the analysis of steroid use, steroid dosages were converted to a prednisone equivalent in mg. A responder was defined as having a prednisone reduction by >=25% from Baseline to <=7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40 through 52. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40 through Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 30.8 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 29.2 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 34.0 |
The CLASI is a single-page tool that separately quantifies disease activity and damage. For the activity score, points are given for the presence of erythema, scale, mucous membrane lesions, recent hair loss, and inflammatory alopecia. The total score represents the sum of the individual scores and ranges from 0 to 70. Higher scores are awarded for more severe manifestations. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 49.0 |
2 mg Baricitinib | 54.3 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 55.8 |
PK: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Baricitinib at Steady State (AUCτ, ss) was evaluated using population PK approach. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Baseline): 15 minutes (min) and 60 min postdose; Week 4: 2 to 4 hours (hr) postdose; Week 8: 4 to 6 hr postdose; Week 12 and Week 16 predose
Intervention | hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 256 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 502 |
Population PK: Maximum Observed Drug Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss) was evaluated using population PK approach. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Baseline): 15 minutes (min) and 60 min postdose; Week 4: 2 to 4 hours (hr) postdose; Week 8: 4 to 6 hr postdose; Week 12 and Week 16 predose
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
2 mg Baricitinib | 26.7 |
4 mg Baricitinib | 53.0 |
Time to first severe flare was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group, baseline disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2K ] <10; SLEDAI-2K ≥10), baseline corticosteroid dose (<10 mg/day; ≥10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), and region fitted as explanatory variables. Participants who did not have severe flare during the flare exposure time period were censored at the end of the flare exposure time. (NCT03616912)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | NA |
2 mg Baricitinib | NA |
4 mg Baricitinib | NA |
Any medically significant changes from the screening ECG was recorded as TEAEs. An abnormal ECG findings such as QT prolonged were reported as treatment emergent adverse events. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 0 |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 2 |
An SRI (4) responder defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index 'A' organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index 'B' organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 milligram per day (mg/day) and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 17.6 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 34.3 |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 28.8 |
An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the MDGA (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 281 through Day 365 (less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1). SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 25.5 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 51.5 |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 38.5 |
Participants on OCS >=10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent at baseline who were able to taper to <= 7.5 mg/day at Day 365 were evaluated. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 365
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 26.6 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 56.4 |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 31.7 |
Type I IFN signature in whole blood assessed by using a 4-gene diagnostic test. The blood samples collected were to be used to prospectively identify participants as IFN test-high or test-low. The results of this test were used to stratify participants. An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 169
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 13.2 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 36 |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 28.2 |
Accumulation ratio for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 337 was calculated. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 337
Intervention | Ratio (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 169 (n=81,86) | Day 337 (n=78,66) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 1.43 | 1.76 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 1.36 | 1.56 |
Accumulation ratio for trough concentration (Ctrough,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 365 was calculated. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 365
Intervention | Ratio (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 169 (n=82,86) | Day 365 (n=79,70) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 2.29 | 3.02 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 2.49 | 3.06 |
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was defined as the peak plasma level of anifrolumab, derived from plasma concentration -time data. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 1, 169 and 337
Intervention | micrograms/milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=98,104) | Day 169 (n=86,87) | Day 337 (n=83,67) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 248 | 375 | 439 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 82.8 | 110 | 127 |
The PD positive and negative gene signature was determined by comparing the expression of type I IFN-inducible genes in a 21-gene panel in study participants relative to pooled normal blood collected from healthy participants. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Days 29, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (treatment phase), on Days 365, 396, and 422 (follow up period)
Intervention | Ratio (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 29 (n= 68, 66, 73) | Day 85 (n= 63, 62, 72) | Day 141 (n= 59, 64, 68) | Day 169 (n= 56, 60, 66) | Day 253 (n= 50, 60, 61) | Day 337 (n= 49, 59, 53) | Day 365 (n= 58, 66, 68) | Day 396 (n= 56, 61, 64) | Day 422 (n= 53, 57, 55) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 82.056 | 79.350 | 88.569 | 88.126 | 86.099 | 87.811 | 81.115 | 72.291 | 37.532 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 70.194 | 72.639 | 73.662 | 77.364 | 73.972 | 79.363 | 72.796 | 11.510 | -0.836 |
Placebo | -0.753 | -5.412 | -25.411 | -17.122 | -9.908 | -13.784 | -6.428 | -22.106 | -31.777 |
Any medically significant change in laboratory evaluations were recorded as Treatment emergent adverse events. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neutrophil count increased | Leukocytosis | Leukopenia | Neutropenia | Anaemia | Iron deficiency anaemia | Lymphopenia | Microcytic anaemia | Thrombocytosis | White blood cell count increased | Monocyte count increased | Hypochromic anaemia | Hyperglycaemia | Hypokalaemia | Hepatic enzyme increased | Hypocalcaemia | Lipid metabolism disorder | Alanine aminotransferase increased | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Hyperlipidaemia | Hypertriglyceridaemia | Hyponatraemia | Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Glomerular filtration rate decreased | Transaminases increased | Dyslipidaemia | Alanine aminotransferase abnormal | Aspartate aminotransferase abnormal | Blood triglycerides abnormal | Glomerular filtration rate increased | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly (in offspring of participant). AEs may be treatment emergent (TE) [that is, occurring after initial receipt of investigational product] or non-TE. An AESI is one of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by investigator to sponsor. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
TEAEs | TESAEs | AESIs | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 90 | 18 | 15 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 84 | 16 | 10 |
Placebo | 78 | 19 | 12 |
Vital sign parameters are temperature, blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and weight. Vital signs abnormalities were reported as TEAEs. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypertension | Pyrexia | Blood pressure increased | Blood pressure decreased | Hypotension | Secondary hypertension | Weight increased | Blood pressure abnormal | Chills | Hypertensive emergency | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Anti-drug antibody responses to anifrolumab in serum were evaluated. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Days 1, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (Treatment Phase), 365, 396, and 422 (Follow-up Period)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=100,98,105) | Day 85 (n=91,93,98) | Day 141 (n=84,94,93) | Day 169 (n=81,89,92) | Day 253 (n=72,86,86) | Day 337 (n=70,87,76) | Day 365 (n=85,96,94) | Day 396 (n=78,88,90) | Day 422 (n=76,86,77) | Any Visit Post Baseline (n= 99,98,102) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 1.9 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 5.1 |
Placebo | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 3.0 |
Trough concentration (Ctrough) of anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365 were calculated. (NCT01438489)
Timeframe: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 29, 169 and 365
Intervention | microgram per milliliter (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Day 29 (n=95,99) | Day 169 (n=87,87) | Day 365 (n=83,71) | |
Anifrolumab 1000 mg | 46.8 | 110 | 154 |
Anifrolumab 300 mg | 7.95 | 18.4 | 23.6 |
8 reviews available for azathioprine and Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous, Subacute
Article | Year |
---|---|
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Age of Onset; Azathioprine; Bias; Biological Factors; Chloroquine; Cosmetic Techniques; Cyclosporine | 2021 |
Hepatitis reactivation in patients with rheumatic diseases after immunosuppressive therapy--a report of long-term follow-up of serial cases and literature review.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azathioprine; Cohort Studies; Derm | 2014 |
The different faces of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Antimalarials; Azathioprine; Biomarkers; Dapsone; Dermatologic Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug | 2009 |
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: update of therapeutic options part II.
Topics: Algorithms; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murin | 2011 |
[Association of systemic diseases and myelodysplastic syndromes. A retrospective study of 14 cases].
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azathioprine; Blood Transfusion; Cyclophosp | 2003 |
Evidence-based evaluation of immunomodulatory therapy for the cutaneous manifestations of lupus.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Antimalarials; Azathioprine; Cladrib | 2004 |
[Systemic treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus].
Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antimal | 2003 |
Treatment of cutaneous lesions in patients with lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antimalarials; Azathioprine; Combined Modality Therapy; Dapsone; Drug Thera | 1994 |
1 trial available for azathioprine and Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous, Subacute
Article | Year |
---|---|
Azathioprine. An effective, corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus or with recalcitrant cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis.
Topics: Adult; Azathioprine; Female; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Vasculitis, | 1991 |
7 other studies available for azathioprine and Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous, Subacute
Article | Year |
---|---|
Successful treatment of bullous lupus with corticosteroids and belimumab: A case report.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azathioprine; Female; Humans; Lup | 2023 |
Intravenous immunoglobulin in the management of refractory lupus profundus.
Topics: Adult; Azathioprine; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; L | 2022 |
Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A series of three patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Azathioprine; Chloroquine; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; H | 2010 |
Pulse cyclophosphamide treatment for severe refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Azathioprine; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; H | 2010 |
Innovative management of lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antimalarials; Azathioprine; C | 2010 |
A tale of two rashes.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Azathioprine; Complement C4; Cryoglobulinemia; Diagnosis, Differentia | 2011 |
Human papillomavirus type 11 in multiple squamous cell carcinomas in a patient with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Acute Disease; Azathioprine; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cocarcinogenesis; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus | 1992 |