avosentan and Diabetic-Nephropathies

To analyse the efficacy and safety of endothelin receptor antagonists for people with diabetic kidney disease.. Randomized controlled trials comparing endothelin receptor antagonists with placebo in people with diabetic kidney disease were identified through PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. We used a random-effect model to calculate the mean difference or risk ratio with the 95% CI.. Seven studies with a total of 4730 participants were included. Overall, endothelin receptor antagonists significantly reduced albuminuria compared with placebo (standardized mean difference -0.48, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.33). Atrasentan, in particular, effectively reduced albuminuria (standardized mean difference -0.58, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.17) and the risk of composite renal endpoints (risk ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.88), with insignificant change in the rate of congestive heart failure (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.56) and mortality (risk ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.61). In contrast, although avosentan reduced albuminuria (standardized mean difference -0.47, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.36) and the risk of composite renal endpoints (risk ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.94), it was associated with a significant increase in congestive heart failure risk (risk ratio 2.61, 95% CI 1.36 to 5.00) and an insignificant increase in mortality risk (risk ratio 1.50, 95% CI 0.81, 2.78). No significant change in efficacy or safety outcomes with bosentan was detected. Dose-response analysis indicated that 0.75 mg/day atrasentan is expected to be optimal for renoprotection, with maximal albuminuria reduction and minimal fluid retention events.. Among the endothelin receptor antagonists, atrasentan and avosentan, but not bosentan, are effective for renoprotection in people with diabetic kidney disease. Compared with other types and doses, atrasentan 0.75 mg/day is the most promising, with maximal albuminuria reduction and minimal fluid retention. Vigilant monitoring of congestive heart failure risk is needed in future clinical practice. (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020169840).

Topics: Albuminuria; Atrasentan; Bosentan; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Heart Failure; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Numerous pre-clinical studies have implicated endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal endothelin-1 production is almost universally increased in kidney disease. The pathologic effects of endothelin-1, including vasoconstriction, proteinuria, inflammation, cellular injury and fibrosis, are likely mediated by the endothelin A (ETA) receptor. ETA antagonism alone, and/or combined ETA/B blockade, reduces CKD progression. Based on the strong pre-clinical data, several clinical trials using ETA antagonists were conducted. Small trials involving acute intravenous endothelin receptor blockade suggest that ETA, but not ETB, blockade exerts protective renal and vascular effects in CKD patients. A large phase 3 trial (ASCEND) examined the effects of avosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, on renal disease progression in diabetic nephropathy. Proteinuria was reduced after 3-6 months of treatment. However the study was terminated due to increased morbidity and mortality associated with avosentan-induced fluid retention. Several phase 2 trials using avosentan at lower doses than in ASCEND, atrasentan or sitaxsentan (the latter two being highly ETA-selective) showed reductions in proteinuria on top of renin-angiotensin system blockade. Infrequent and clinically insignificant fluid retention was observed at the most effective doses. Additional trials using ETA blockers are ongoing or being planned in patients with diabetic nephropathy or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Moving forward, such studies must be conducted with careful patient selection and attention to dosing in order to minimize adverse side effects. Nonetheless, there is cause for optimism that this class of agents will ultimately prove to be effective for the treatment of CKD.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin B Receptor Antagonists; Endothelin-1; Humans; Isoxazoles; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Diabetic nephropathy constitutes a major health care challenge. In the current review we summarize the rationale and preclinical data that suggest involvement of the endothelin (ET) system in the pathogenesis of this complication of diabetes. Early clinical studies suggest that blockade of the ET system indeed may have renoprotective effects, as reflected by a strong reduction in albumin excretion. A major challenge in the clinical development of ET receptor blockades for this indication will be to tease out the protective effects from potential off-target effects. Of particular concern is the edema formation during ET receptor blockade.

Topics: Atrasentan; Clinical Trials as Topic; Creatinine; Diabetic Nephropathies; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Serum Albumin

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, and both the incidence and prevalence of diabetic nephropathy continue to increase. Currently, various treatment regimens and combinations of therapies provide only partial renoprotection. It is obvious that new approaches are desperately needed to retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Recently, a number of new agents have been described that have the potential to delay the progression of diabetic kidney disease and minimize the growing burden of end-stage renal disease. These include inhibitors and breakers of advanced glycation end products, receptor antagonists for advanced glycation end products, protein kinase C inhibitors, NADPH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) oxidase inhibitors, glycosaminoglycans, endothelin receptor antagonists, antifibrotic agents, and growth factor inhibitors. This review addresses these promising new therapeutic agents for delaying the progression of diabetic kidney disease.

Topics: Amides; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Connective Tissue Growth Factor; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Progression; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Glycosaminoglycans; Guanidines; Humans; Hydrazines; Kidney; NADPH Oxidases; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Pentoxifylline; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyridoxamine; Pyrimidines; Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products; Receptors, Immunologic; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitamin B Complex

The Avosentan on Time to Doubling of Serum Creatinine, End Stage Renal Disease or Death (ASCEND) trial tested the renoprotective effect of the endothelin receptor antagonist avosentan in patients with diabetes and nephropathy, but the study was terminated due to an excess of congestive heart failure (CHF) events in the avosentan arms, likely due to fluid retention. The aim of this study was to identify risk markers of CHF after treatment with avosentan.. In a post hoc analysis of the ASCEND trial (N=1392 participants), we assessed which baseline characteristics predicted CHF risk during avosentan treatment. Furthermore, postrandomization changes between baseline and the first available measurement of body weight and hemoglobin were examined as potential clinical indicators of fluid retention for their relationship with CHF development.. Relative to placebo, avosentan increased CHF risk (hazard ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.68 to 4.54). The avosentan-related CHF risk was higher with lower baseline cholesterol levels (P interaction=0.003) and concomitant statin use (P interaction=0.06), whereas it was lower with a lower estimated GFR (P interaction=0.04). Patients allocated to avosentan had a median body weight increase of 0.6 kg (interquartile range, 0.0 to 2.0 kg) and a median hemoglobin decrease of 1.4 g/dl (interquartile range, -2.1 to -0.7 g/dl) at the first postrandomization measurement. The body weight increase induced by avosentan was associated with CHF development (P interaction=0.04), whereas hemoglobin decrease was not (P interaction=0.64). The increase in body weight was particularly pronounced in patients with a cardiovascular disease history and in patients using statins.. In avosentan-treated patients, body weight increase, but not hemoglobin decrease, was associated with CHF development, indicating that close body weight monitoring could provide an early signal of CHF development in future trials with endothelin receptor antagonists.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Double-Blind Method; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Hemoglobins; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Endothelin; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

In the short term, the endothelin antagonist avosentan reduces proteinuria, but whether this translates to protection from progressive loss of renal function is unknown. We examined the effects of avosentan on progression of overt diabetic nephropathy in a multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned 1392 participants with type 2 diabetes to oral avosentan (25 or 50 mg) or placebo in addition to continued angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and/or angiotensin receptor blockade. The composite primary outcome was the time to doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. Secondary outcomes included changes in albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and cardiovascular outcomes. We terminated the trial prematurely after a median follow-up of 4 months (maximum 16 months) because of an excess of cardiovascular events with avosentan. We did not detect a difference in the frequency of the primary outcome between groups. Avosentan significantly reduced ACR: In patients who were treated with avosentan 25 mg/d, 50 mg/d, and placebo, the median reduction in ACR was 44.3, 49.3, and 9.7%, respectively. Adverse events led to discontinuation of trial medication significantly more often for avosentan than for placebo (19.6 and 18.2 versus 11.5% for placebo), dominated by fluid overload and congestive heart failure; death occurred in 21 (4.6%; P = 0.225), 17 (3.6%; P = 0.194), and 12 (2.6%), respectively. In conclusion, avosentan reduces albuminuria when added to standard treatment in people with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy but induces significant fluid overload and congestive heart failure.

Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Progression; Endothelins; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Proteinuria; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome; Water-Electrolyte Imbalance

Despite the first-line use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), there is still a large need to improve the prevention and progression of diabetic nephropathy and its associated cardiovascular events. Endothelin antagonists have shown anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antiproteinuric effects in experimental studies. This study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-design, dosage-range study of the effect of the endothelin-A antagonist avosentan (SPP301) on urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in patients with diabetic nephropathy. We randomly assigned 286 patients with diabetic nephropathy, macroalbuminuria (UAER 0.2 to 5.6 mg/min), and BP <180/110 mmHg to 12 wk of avosentan (5, 10, 25, and 50 mg) or placebo, in addition to standard ACEI/ARB therapy. Relative to baseline, all avosentan dosages decreased mean relative UAER (-16.3 to -29.9%) compared with placebo (35.5%). Median relative UAER decreased with all avosentan dosages (-28.7 to -44.8%) compared with placebo (12.1%). Creatinine clearance and BP were unchanged at 12 wk. The main adverse events were peripheral edema (12%), mainly with high (>/=25 mg) dosages of avosentan; significant increases in liver enzymes did not occur. Twenty-one (7.3%) patients experienced adverse events that led to withdrawal from study medication. In summary, the endothelin-A antagonist avosentan given in addition to standard ACEI/ARB treatment decreases UAER in patients with diabetic nephropathy and macroalbuminuria.

Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidines

Topics: Albuminuria; Atrasentan; Diabetic Nephropathies; Endothelins; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Proteinuria; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Renin-Angiotensin System; Treatment Outcome

There is convincing evidence that the endothelin system contributes to diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to assess the effects of the non-peptidergic endothelin receptor A (ETA) antagonist avosentan in a mouse model of accelerated diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in comparison with the ACE inhibitor, quinapril.. Apolipoprotein E (Apoe) knockout (KO) mice (n = 20 per group, five groups) were randomised to the following groups: non-diabetic controls and streptozotocin-induced diabetic animals gavaged daily for 20 weeks with placebo, avosentan (high dose: 30 mg/kg, or low dose: 10 mg/kg) or quinapril (given in drinking water, 30 mg/kg).. BP was unchanged by avosentan treatment but decreased with quinapril treatment. Diabetes-associated albuminuria was significantly attenuated by high-dose avosentan after 10 and 20 weeks of treatment. Diabetic animals showed a decreased creatinine clearance, which was normalised by avosentan treatment. In diabetic mice, high-dose avosentan treatment significantly attenuated the glomerulosclerosis index, mesangial matrix accumulation, glomerular accumulation of the matrix proteins collagen IV, and renal expression of genes encoding connective tissue growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor beta and nuclear factor kappaB (p65 subunit). Furthermore, high-dose avosentan treatment was also associated with reduced expression of the genes for ETA, ETB and angiotensin receptor 1. The renoprotective effects of avosentan were comparable or superior to those observed with quinapril. High-dose avosentan also significantly attenuated diabetes-associated aortic atherosclerosis in Apoe KO mice and reduced macrophage infiltration and aortic nitrotyrosine expression.. This study demonstrates that ETA blockade with avosentan may provide an alternate therapeutic strategy for the treatment of diabetic micro- and macrovascular complications.

Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Apolipoproteins E; Atherosclerosis; Blood Pressure; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Models, Animal; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Hyperglycemia; Hyperlipidemias; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinapril; Tetrahydroisoquinolines

Topics: Diabetic Nephropathies; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of simultaneously blocking angiotensin II synthesis and endothelin (ET)-1 activity as a multimodal intervention to implement renoprotection in overt diabetic nephropathy. Mechanisms underlying combined therapy effectiveness were addressed by investigating podocyte structure and function and glomerular barrier size-selective properties. Uninephrectomized rats made diabetic by streptozotocin received orally placebo, lisinopril (12.5 mg/l), the ET(A) receptor antagonist avosentan (30 mg/kg), or their combination from 4 (when animals had proteinuria) to 8 mo. Proteinuria, renal damage, podocyte number, nephrin expression, and glomerular size selectivity by graded-size Ficoll molecule fractional clearance were assessed. Combined therapy normalized proteinuria, provided complete protection from tubulointerstitial damage, and induced regression of glomerular lesions, while only a partial renoprotection was achieved by each drug alone. Lisinopril plus avosentan restored to normal values the number of podocytes. Single therapies only limited podocyte depletion. Defective nephrin expression of diabetes was prevented by each drug. Altered glomerular size selectivity to large macromolecules of diabetic rats was remarkably improved by lisinopril and the combined treatment. Avosentan ameliorated peritubular capillary architecture and reduced interstitial inflammation and fibrosis. The ACE inhibitor and ET(A) receptor antagonist induced regression of glomerular lesions in overt diabetic nephropathy. Regression of renal disease was conceivably the result of the synergistic effect of the ACE inhibitor of preserving glomerular permselective properties and the ET(A) antagonist in improving tubulointerstitial changes. These findings provide mechanistic insights to explain the antiproteinuric effect of this combined therapy in diabetes.

Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Capillaries; Cell Count; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists; Immunohistochemistry; Kidney; Kidney Glomerulus; Lipids; Lisinopril; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Podocytes; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger